Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase

Prometaphase in two large species of diatoms is examined, using the following techniques: (a) time-lapse cinematography of chromosome movements in vivo; (b) electron microscopy of corresponding stages: (c) reconstruction of the microtubules (MTs) in the kinetochore fiber of chromosomes attached to the spindle. In vivo, the chromosomes independently commence oscillations back and forth to one pole. The kinetochore is usually at the leading edge of such chromosome movements; a variable time later both kinetochores undergo such oscillations but toward opposite poles and soon stretch poleward to establish stable bipolar attachment. Electron microscopy of early prometaphase shows that the kinetochores usually laterally associate with MTs that have one end attached to the spindle pole. At late prometaphase, most chromosomes are fully attached to the spindle, but the kinetochores on unattached chromosomes are bare of MTs. Reconstruction of the kinetochore fiber demonstrates that most of its MTs (96%) extend past the kinetochore and are thus apparently not nucleated there. At least one MT terminates at each kinetochore analyzed. Our interpretation is that the conventional view of kinetochore function cannot apply to diatoms. The kinetochore fiber in diatoms appears to be primarily composed of MTs from the poles, in contrast to the conventional view that many MTs of the kinetochore fiber are nucleated by the kinetochore. Similarly, chromosomes appear to initially orient their kinetochores to opposite poles by moving along MTs attached to the poles, instead of orientation effected by kinetochore MTs laterally associating with other MTs in the spindle. The function of the kinetochore in diatoms and other cell types is discussed.     

Kinetochore fiber formation in animal somatic cells: dueling mechanisms come to a draw

The attachment to and movement of a chromosome on the mitotic spindle are mediated by the formation of a bundle of microtubules (MTs) that tethers the kinetochore on the chromosome to a spindle pole. The origin of these “kinetochore fibers” (K fibers) has been investigated for over 125 years. As noted in 1944 by Schrader [Mitosis, Columbia University Press, New York, 110 pp.], there are three possible ways to form a K fiber: (a) it grows from the pole until it contacts the kinetochore, (b) it grows directly from the kinetochore, or (c) it forms as a result of an interaction between the pole and the chromosome. Since Schrader's time, it has been firmly established that K fibers in centrosome-containing animal somatic cells form as kinetochores capture MTs growing from the spindle pole (route a). It is now similarly clear that in cells lacking centrosomes, including higher plants and many animal oocytes, K fibers “self-assemble” from MTs generated by the chromosomes (route b). Can animal somatic cells form K fibers in the absence of centrosomes by the “self-assembly” pathway? In 2000, the answer to this question was shown to be a resounding “yes.” With this result, the next question became whether the presence of a centrosome normally suppresses K fiber self-assembly or if this route works concurrently with centrosome-mediated K-fiber formation. This question, too, has recently been answered: observations on untreated live animal cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tagged tubulin clearly show that kinetochores can nucleate the formation of their associated MTs in a unique manner in the presence of functional centrosomes. The concurrent operation of these two “dueling” routes for forming K fibers in animal cells helps explain why the attachment of kinetochores and the maturation of K fibers occur as quickly as they do on all chromosomes within a cell.     

Kinetochore rearrangement in meiosis II requires attachment to the spindle

The distinctive behaviors of chromosomes in mitosis and meiosis depend upon differences in kinetochore position. Kinetochore position is well established except for a critical transition between meiosis I and meiosis II. We examined kinetochore position during the transition and compared it with the position of kinetochores in mitosis. Immunofluorescence staining using the 3F3/2 antibody showed that in mitosis in grasshopper cells, as in other organisms, kinetochores are positioned on opposite sides of the two sister chromatids. In meiosis I, sister kinetochores are positioned side by side. At nuclear envelope breakdown in meiosis II, sister kinetochores are still side by side, but are separated by the time all chromosomes have fully attached in metaphase II. Micromanipulation experiments reveal that this switch from side-by-side to separated sister kinetochores requires attachment to the spindle. Moreover, it is irreversible, as chromosomes detached from a metaphase II spindle retain separate kinetochores. How this critical separation of sister kinetochores occurs in meiosis is uncertain, but clearly it is not built into the chromosome before nuclear envelope breakdown, as it is in mitosis.     

The attachment of kinetochores to the pro-metaphase spindle in PtK1 cells

When late prophase PtK₁ cells are chilled to 6 ° C the nuclear envelope (NE) breaks down as in normal cells but the spindle is inhibited from forming. When these cells are subsequently warmed to 18 ° C the spindle slowly forms and pro-metaphase congression ensues. Using this approach we have been able to experimentally eliminate the influence of asynchronous NE breakdown on the formation and development of the spindle, and also to slow down (and thus increase the temporal separation of) the subsequent events which occur during the initial stages of spindle formation. Correlative light and high voltage electron microscopic studies on these cells, fixed after various times of recovery, reveal the following results: 1) the centrosomes generate microtubules (MTs) well before MTs are seen to be associated with the kinetochores; 2) as in untreated PtK₁ cells (Roos, 1973a, 1976) the order in which chromosomes attach to the forming spindle is influenced by their proximity to a centrosome-kinetochores closest to a centrosome appear stretched towards the centrosome at a time during recovery when other kinetochores, more distal to the centrosome appear unstretched and unoriented; 3) as in untreated cells (Heneen, 1970; Roos, 1976) the predominant behavior during recovery is for a chromosome to initially mono-orient and associate with the near centrosome and only later to develop a bipolar association; and 4) MTs associated with early pro-metaphase kinetochores are almost always oriented towards a centrosome. — From our results we conclude that the proximity effect and the tendency of pro-metaphase chromosomes in PtK₁ to initially mono-orient and associate with the near centrosome cannot be ascribed, as suggested by Roos (1976), to influences arising during the asynchronous breakdown of the NE. Rather, our data clearly demonstrate that a kinetochore-centrosome interaction occurs during spindle formation which cannot be attributed to transient influences. The proximity effect and the predominant tendency of PtK₁ pro-metaphase chromosomes to mono-orient to the near pole are taken to signify the existance of a centrosomal influence on the attachment and orientation of chromosomes. Two possible mechanisms for this influence, both involving a structural interaction between the centrosome and the kinetochore, are outlined.     

Kinetochore-generated pushing forces separate centrosomes during bipolar spindle assembly

In animal somatic cells, bipolar spindle formation requires separation of the centrosome-based spindle poles. Centrosome separation relies on multiple pathways, including cortical forces and antiparallel microtubule (MT) sliding, which are two activities controlled by the protein kinase aurora A. We previously found that depletion of the human kinetochore protein Mcm21R^CENP-O results in monopolar spindles, raising the question as to whether kinetochores contribute to centrosome separation. In this study, we demonstrate that kinetochores promote centrosome separation after nuclear envelope breakdown by exerting a pushing force on the kinetochore fibers (k-fibers), which are bundles of MTs that connect kinetochores to centrosomes. This force is based on poleward MT flux, which incorporates new tubulin subunits at the plus ends of k-fibers and requires stable k-fibers to drive centrosomes apart. This kinetochore-dependent force becomes essential for centrosome separation if aurora A is inhibited. We conclude that two mechanisms control centrosome separation during prometaphase: an aurora A–dependent pathway and a kinetochore-dependent pathway that relies on k-fiber–generated pushing forces.     

Kinetochore dynein generates a poleward pulling force to facilitate congression and full chromosome alignment

For proper chromosome segregation, all kinetochores must achieve bipolar microtubule （MT） attachment and subsequently align at the spindle equator before anaphase onset. The MT minus end-directed motor dynein/dynactin binds kinetoehores in prometaphase and has long been implicated in chromosome congression. Unfortunately, inactivation of dynein usually disturbs spindle organization, thus hampering evaluation of its kinetochore roles. Here we specifically eliminated kinetochore dynein/dynactin by RNAi-mediated depletion of ZW10, a protein essential for kinetochore localization of the motor. Time-lapse microscopy indicated markedly-reduced congression efficiency, though congressing chromosomes displayed similar velocities as in control cells. Moreover, cells frequently failed to achieve full chromosome alignment, despite their normal spindles. Confocal microcopy revealed that the misaligned kinetochores were monooriented or unattached and mostly lying outside the spindle, suggesting a difficulty to capture MTs from the opposite pole. Kinetoehores on monoastral spindles were dispersed farther away from the pole and exhibited only mild oscillation. Furthermore, inactivating dynein by other means generated similar phenotypes. Therefore, kinetochore dynein produces on monooriented kinetochores a poleward pulling force, which may contribute to efficient bipolar attachment by facilitating their proper microtubule captures to promote congression as well as full chromosome alignment.     

Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis

Kinetochores in rat kangaroo (PtK₂) cells in prophase of mitosis are finely fibrillar, globular bodies, 5000–8000 Å in diameter. Sister kinetochores are attached to opposite lateral faces in the primary constriction of chromosomes. No microtubules (MTs) occur in prophase nuclei. During prometaphase the ball-shaped kinetochores differentiate into trilaminar plaques. An outer kinetochore layer, less electron dense than chromatin, appears first in the fibrillar matrix. The inner layer, continuous with, but more electron dense than the chromosome, is formed later. Kinetochore-spindle MT interaction is evident at the very beginning of prometaphase. As a result, kinetochore shape is very variable, but three types of kinetochores can be distinguished by fine structure analysis. A comparison of kinetochore structure and chromosome position in the mitotic spindle yielded clues regarding initial orientation and congression. At the time the nuclear envelope (NE) breaks down chromosomes near asters orient first. Chromosomes approximately equidistant from the two spindle poles amphi-orient immediately. Chromosomes closer to one pole probably achieve mono-orientation first, then amphi-orient and congress. In normal metaphase all the chromosomes lie at or near the spindle equator and kinetochores are structurally uniform. Paraxial and para-equatorial sections revealed that they are trilaminar, roughly circular plaques of 4000–6000 Å diameter. Inner and outer layers are 400 Å, and the electron translucent middle layer which separates them is 270 Å thick. From 16 to 40 MTs are anchored in the outer layer. In cold-treated cells the kinetochores are trilaminar, but in colcemid-treated cells the inner layer is lacking. Both kinetochores and their MTs are disorganized beginning in late anaphase. In telophase the inner layer persists for some time as an electron dense patch apposed to the NE, while the outer layer disintegrates.     

Kinetochores on chromosomes enclosed within the nuclear envelope

The kinetochore plate which develops after nuclear envelope breakdown in normal cells can be seen to be formed on condensed chromosomes still enclosed in the nuclear envelope in fused multinucleate cells where some nuclei show delayed envelope breakdown caused by nuclear interaction. This suggests that neither nuclear envelope breakdown nor assembly of microtubules is directly related to the formation of the kinetochore plate. Furthermore, it can be clearly observed in these cells that the kinetochores do not have any special association with the nuclear envelope.     

Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm

Organization of kinetochore fiber microtubules (MTs) throughout mitosis in the endosperm of Haemanthus katherinae Bak. has been analysed using serial section reconstruction from electron micrographs. Accurate and complete studies have required careful analysis of individual MTs in precisely oriented serial sections through many (45) preselected cells. Kinetochore MTs (kMTs) and non-kinetochore MTs (nkMTs) intermingle within the fiber throughout division, undergoing characteristic, time- dependent, organizational changes. The number of kMTs increases progressively throughout the kinetochore during prometaphase-metaphase. Prometaphase chromosomes which were probably moving toward the pole at the time of fixation have unequally developed kinetochores associated with many nkMTs. The greatest numbers of kMTs (74-109/kinetochore), kinetochore cross-sectional area, and kMT central density all occur at metaphase. Throughout anaphase and telophase there is a decrease in the number of kMTs and, in the kinetochore cross-sectional area, an increased obliquity of kMTs and increased numbers of short MTs near the kinetochore. Delayed kinetochores possess more kMTs than do kinetochores near the poles, but fewer kMTs than chromosomes which have moved equivalent distances in other cells. The frequency of C-shaped proximal MT terminations within kinetochores is highest at early prometaphase and midtelophase, falling to zero at midanaphase. Therefore, in Haemanthus, MTs are probably lost from the periphery of the kinetochore during anaphase in a manner which is related to both time and position of the chromosome along the spindle axis. The complex, time-dependent organization of MTs in the kinetochore region strongly suggests that chromosome movement is accompanied by continual MT rearrangement and/or assembly/disassembly.     

Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle

To test the popular but unproven assumption that the metaphase-anaphase transition in vertebrate somatic cells is subject to a checkpoint that monitors chromosome (i.e., kinetochore) attachment to the spindle, we filmed mitosis in 126 PtK1 cells. We found that the time from nuclear envelope breakdown to anaphase onset is linearly related (r2 = 0.85) to the duration the cell has unattached kinetochores, and that even a single unattached kinetochore delays anaphase onset. We also found that anaphase is initiated at a relatively constant 23-min average interval after the last kinetochore attaches, regardless of how long the cell possessed unattached kinetochores. From these results we conclude that vertebrate somatic cells possess a metaphase-anaphase checkpoint control that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. We also found that some cells treated with 0.3-0.75 nM Taxol, after the last kinetochore attached to the spindle, entered anaphase and completed normal poleward chromosome motion (anaphase A) up to 3 h after the treatment--well beyond the 9-48-min range exhibited by untreated cells. The fact that spindle bipolarity and the metaphase alignment of kinetochores are maintained in these cells, and that the chromosomes move poleward during anaphase, suggests that the checkpoint monitors more than just the attachment of microtubules at sister kinetochores or the metaphase alignment of chromosomes. Our data are most consistent with the hypothesis that the checkpoint monitors an increase in tension between kinetochores and their associated microtubules as biorientation occurs.     

Timing of centrosome separation is important for accurate chromosome segregation

Spindle assembly, establishment of kinetochore attachment, and sister chromatid separation must occur during mitosis in a highly coordinated fashion to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. In most vertebrate cells, the nuclear envelope must break down to allow interaction between microtubules of the mitotic spindle and the kinetochores. It was previously shown that nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) is not coordinated with centrosome separation and that centrosome separation can be either complete at the time of NEB or can be completed after NEB. In this study, we investigated whether the timing of centrosome separation affects subsequent mitotic events such as establishment of kinetochore attachment or chromosome segregation. We used a combination of experimental and computational approaches to investigate kinetochore attachment and chromosome segregation in cells with complete versus incomplete spindle pole separation at NEB. We found that cells with incomplete spindle pole separation exhibit higher rates of kinetochore misattachments and chromosome missegregation than cells that complete centrosome separation before NEB. Moreover, our mathematical model showed that two spindle poles in close proximity do not "search" the entire cellular space, leading to formation of large numbers of syntelic attachments, which can be an intermediate stage in the formation of merotelic kinetochores.     

Role of microtubule organization in centrosome migration and mitotic spindle formation in PtK1 cells

Summary Quinacrine, an acridine derivative, has previously been shown to disrupt lateral associations between non-kinetochore microtubules (nkMTs) of opposite polarity in PtK₁ metaphase spindles such that the balance of spindle forces is significantly altered. We extended the analysis of the spatial relationship of spindle microtubules (MTs) in this study by using quinacrine to compare ATP-dependent requirements for early prometaphase centrosome separation and spindle formation. The route used for centrosome migration can take a variety of pathways in PtK₁ cells, depending on the location of the centrosomes at the time of nuclear envelope breakdown. Following quinacrine treatment centrosome separation decresased by 1.9 to 14.0 m depending on the pathway utilized. However, birefringence of the centrosomal region increased approximately 50% after quinacrine treatment. Quinacrine-treated mid-prometaphase cells, where chromosome attachment to MTs had occurred, showed a decrease in spindle length of approximately 6.0 m with only a slight increase in astral birefringence. Computer-generated reconstructions of quinacrine-treated prometaphase cells were used to confirm changes in MT reorganization. Early-prometaphase cells showed more astral MTs (aMTs) of varied length while mid-prometaphase cells showed only a few short aMTs. Late prometaphase cells again showed a large number of aMTs. Our results suggest that: (1) quinacrine treatment affects centrosome separation, (2) recruitment of nkMTs by kinetochores is quinacrine-sensitive, and (3) development of the prometaphase spindle is dependent on quinacrine-sensitive lateral interactions between nkMTs of opposite polarity. These data also suggest that lateral interactions between MTs formed during prometaphase are necessary for centrosome separation and normal spindle formation but not necessarily chromosome motion.Abbreviations aMT(s) astral microtubule(s) - DIC differential interference contrast - MT(s) microtubule(s) - kMT(s) kinetochore microtubule(s) - NEB nuclear envelope breakdown - nkMT(s) non-kinetochore microtubule(s)     

Localization of kinetochore fragments isolated from single chromatids in mitotic CHO cells

Summary Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are treated with hydroxurea followed by a caffeine treatment to form detached kinetochore fragments in the absence of sister chromatids. Detached kinetochores in mitotic CHO cells display a functional association with MTs initiated from one or both centrosomes such that these association(s) have a significant influence on the location and orientation of detached kinetochores and/or their fragments. Kinetochore fragments which are amphitelically oriented are positioned approximately midway between the two centrosomes. Thus, a kinetochore isolated from a single chromatid can capture MTs from both poles. Monotelic orientation of these fragments is more frequently observed with kinetochore fragments located an average distance of 2.5 m from the nearest centrosome, compared to an average distance of 4.4 m in amphitelically oriented fragments. In cells treated with the potent MT poison, nocodazole, kinetochore isolation also occurs and therefore is not dependent on the presence of MTs. CHO cells treated to produce isolated kinetochores or kinetochore fragments then subsequently hyperosmotically shocked show no MTs directly inserted into kinetochore lamina, similar to the response of sucrose-treated metapbase PtK₁ cells. This treatment shows circular kinetochores tangentially associated with bundles of MTs that are located an average of 1.5 m from the centrosome. Our results suggest that a single kinetochore fragment can attach to MTs initiated from one or both centrosomes and that their specific association to MT fibers defines orientation of detached kinetochores within the spindle domain.     

Changes in prometaphase chromosome motion are dependent on experimentally induced changes in kinetochore structure.

Prometaphase PtK₁ cells are treated with low concentrations of sucrose in order to analyze its effects on kinetochore structure, microtubule (MT) associations with the developing kinetochore and chromosome congression. Prometaphase cells treated with 0.15M sucrose slows chromosome congression, yet chromosomes form a metaphase configuration. However, 0.2M sucrose treatment prevents chromosome congression and affects some of the kinetochore MT linkages with the kinetochore, resulting in loss of chromosome congression. We use time lapse video microscopy and ultrastructural analysis to correlate changes in the linkages in the kinetochore MTs and the kinetochore to explain these findings. It appears hyperosmotic shock treatment can produce non-functional linkages between kinetochore MTs and kinetochores such that chromosome congression is affected. When non-functional linkages are formed, the presence of both a corona and matrix-like material is also present, proximal to the kinetochore. The role of this material and its organization at the klnetochore is discussed in its relation to generating mitotic forces.     

Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis

It is now clear that a centrosome-independent pathway for mitotic spindle assembly exists even in cells that normally possess centrosomes. The question remains, however, whether this pathway only activates when centrosome activity is compromised, or whether it contributes to spindle morphogenesis during a normal mitosis. Here, we show that many of the kinetochore fibers (K-fibers) in centrosomal Drosophila S2 cells are formed by the kinetochores. Initially, kinetochore-formed K-fibers are not oriented toward a spindle pole but, as they grow, their minus ends are captured by astral microtubules (MTs) and transported poleward through a dynein-dependent mechanism. This poleward transport results in chromosome bi-orientation and congression. Furthermore, when individual K-fibers are severed by laser microsurgery, they regrow from the kinetochore outward via MT plus-end polymerization at the kinetochore. Thus, even in the presence of centrosomes, the formation of some K-fibers is initiated by the kinetochores. However, centrosomes facilitate the proper orientation of K-fibers toward spindle poles by integrating them into a common spindle.     

Density and distribution of α-bungarotoxin-binding sites in postsynaptic structures of regenerated rat skeletal muscle

The polarity of kinetochore microtubules (MTs) has been studied in lysed PtK1 cells by polymerizing hook-shaped sheets of neurotubulin onto walls of preexisting cellular MTs in a fashion that reveals their structural polarity. Three different approaches are presented here: (a) we have screened the polarity of all MTs in a given spindle cross section taken from the region between the kinetochores and the poles, (b) we have determined the polarity of kinetochore MTs are more stable to cold-treated spindles; this approach takes advantage of the fact that kinetochore MTs are more stable to cold treatment than other spindle MTs; and (c) we have tracked bundles of kinetochore MTs from the vicinity of the pole to the outer layer of the kinetochore in cold- treated cells. In an anaphase cell, 90-95% of all MTs in an area between the kinetochores and the poles are of uniform polarity with their plus ends (i.e., fast growing ends) distal to the pole. In cold- treated cells, all bundles of kinetochore MTs show the same polarity; the plus ends of the MTs are located at the kinetochores. We therefore conclude that kinetochore MTs in both metaphase and anaphase cells have the same polarity as the aster MTs in each half-spindle. These results can be interpreted in two ways: (a) virtually all MTs are initiated at the spindle poles and some of the are "captured" by matured kinetochores using an as yet unknown mechanism to bind the plus ends of existing MTs; (b) the growth of kinetochore MTs is initiated at the kinetochore in such a way that the fast growing MT end is proximal to the kinetochore. Our data are inconsistent with previous kinetochore MT polarity determinations based on growth rate measurements in vitro. These studies used drug-treated cells from which chromosomes were isolated to serve as seeds for initiation of neurotubule polymerization. It is possible that under these conditions kinetochores will initiate MTs with a polarity opposite to the one described here.     

The Microtubule-dependent Motor Centromere–associated Protein E (CENP-E) Is an Integral Component of Kinetochore Corona Fibers That Link Centromeres to Spindle Microtubules

Centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E) is a kinesin-related microtubule motor protein that is essential for chromosome congression during mitosis. Using immunoelectron microscopy, CENP-E is shown to be an integral component of the kinetochore corona fibers that tether centromeres to the spindle. Immediately upon nuclear envelope fragmentation, an associated plus end motor trafficks cytoplasmic CENP-E toward chromosomes along astral microtubules that enter the nuclear volume. Before or concurrently with initial lateral attachment of spindle microtubules, CENP-E targets to the outermost region of the developing kinetochores. After stable attachment, throughout chromosome congression, at metaphase, and throughout anaphase A, CENP-E is a constituent of the corona fibers, extending at least 50 nm away from the kinetochore outer plate and intertwining with spindle microtubules. In congressing chromosomes, CENP-E is preferentially associated with (or accessible at) the stretched, leading kinetochore known to provide the primary power for chromosome movement. Taken together, this evidence strongly supports a model in which CENP-E functions in congression to tether kinetochores to the disassembling microtubule plus ends.     

Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly

Nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) and release of condensed chromosomes into the cytoplasm are key events in the early stages of mitosis in metazoans. NEBD involves the disassembly of all major structural elements of the nuclear envelope, including nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), and the dispersal of nuclear membrane components. The breakdown process is facilitated by microtubules of the mitotic spindle. After NEBD, engagement of spindle microtubules with chromosome-associated kinetochores leads to chromatid segregation. Several NPC subunits relocate to kinetochores after NEBD. siRNA-mediated depletion of one of these proteins, Nup358, reveals that it is essential for kinetochore function. In the absence of Nup358, chromosome congression and segregation are severely perturbed. At the same time, the assembly of other kinetochore components is strongly inhibited, leading to aberrant kinetochore structure. The implication is that Nup358 plays an essential role in integrating NEBD with kinetochore maturation and function. Mitotic arrest associated with Nup358 depletion further suggests that mitotic checkpoint complexes may remain active at nonkinetochore sites.     

Dynamic distribution of TTK in HeLa cells： insights from an ultrastructural study

Entry into mitosis is driven by signaling cascades of mitotic kinases. Our recent studies show that TTK, a kinetochore-associated protein kinase, interacts with CENP-E, a mitotic kinesin located to corona fiber of kinetochore. Using immunoelectron microscopy, here we show that TTK is present at the nuclear pore adjacent complex of interphase HeLa cells. Upon nuclear envelope fragmentation, TTK targets to the outermost region of the developing kinetochores of monoorient chromosome as well as to spindle poles. After stable attachment, throughout chromosome congression, TTK is a constituent of the corona fibers, extending up to 90 nm away from the kinetochore outer plate. Upon metaphase alignment, TTK departs from the kinetochore and migrates toward the centrosomes. Taken together, this evidence strongly supports a model in which TTK functions in spindle checkpoint signaling cascades at both kinetochore and centrosome.     

Microtubule depolymerization can drive poleward chromosome motion in fission yeast

Prometaphase kinetochores interact with spindle microtubules (MTs) to establish chromosome bi-orientation. Before becoming bi-oriented, chromosomes frequently exhibit poleward movements (P-movements), which are commonly attributed to minus end-directed, MT-dependent motors. In fission yeast there are three such motors: dynein and two kinesin-14s, Pkl1p and Klp2p. None of these enzymes is essential for viability, and even the triple deletion grows well. This might be due to the fact that yeasts kinetochores are normally juxtapolar at mitosis onset, removing the need for poleward chromosome movement during prometaphase. Anaphase P-movement might also be dispensable in a spindle that elongates significantly. To test this supposition, we have analyzed kinetochore dynamics in cells whose kinetochore-pole connections have been dispersed. In cells recovering from this condition, the maximum rate of poleward kinetochore movement was unaffected by the deletion of any or all of these motors, strongly suggesting that other factors, like MT depolymerization, can cause such movements in vivo. However, Klp2p, which localizes to kinetochores, contributed to the effectiveness of P-movement by promoting the shortening of kinetochore fibers.