肿瘤标志物联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用

目的:探讨肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖链抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖链抗原15-3(CA15-3)联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用价值。方法:检测87例乳腺癌患者,55例乳腺良性肿瘤患者和35例健康人血清中CEA、CA19-9、CA153等肿瘤标志物的水平及3种标志物不同组合对乳腺癌的阳性检出率。结果:乳腺癌患者3种肿瘤标志物显著高于正常对照组及乳腺良性肿瘤组(P<0.01)。3项标志物不同组合对不同分期乳腺癌检出的敏感性均高于单项标志物。其中CEA+CA199+CA153组合的检出敏感性较其他组合均高,特别是对早期患者检出率明显提高。结论:CEA+CA199+CA153联合检测能提高乳腺癌的早期诊断率。     

HIF-1α、CEA和CA724水平检测诊断早期胃癌

为了探讨HIF-1α、CEA和CA724水平检测在诊断早期胃癌中的效果,本研究分别采用免疫组化法检测胃癌组、良性疾病组和正常组受检者的HIF-1α表达,采用化学发光微粒子免疫法检测受试者血清CEA和CA724水平,并分析单一肿瘤标志物检测及联合检测的灵敏性、特异性和准确性。研究结果表明:胃癌组HIF-1α、CEA和CA724的阳性率依次为81.50%、66.50%和63.00%,均显著高于良性疾病组和正常组(p0.05)。良性疾病组和正常组的HIF-1α、CEA和CA724的阳性率无统计学显著性(p0.05)。HIF-1α、CEA和CA724这3个检测指标联合诊断胃癌的灵敏性(85.30%)、特异性(90.10%)和准确性(87.70%)均显著高于单独诊断(p0.05)。在胃癌早期诊断中,采用单一肿瘤标志物容易造成误诊和漏诊,而采用多项肿瘤标志物联合检测胃癌可有效提高诊断的灵敏性、特异性和准确性。     

肿瘤标志物联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用

目的：探讨肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖链抗原19-9（CA19-9）、糖链抗原15-3（CA15-3）联合检测在乳腺癌早期诊断中的应用价值。方法：检测87例乳腺癌患者,55例乳腺良性肿瘤患者和35例健康人血清中CEA、CA19-9、CA153等肿瘤标志物的水平及3种标志物不同组合对乳腺癌的阳性检出率。结果：乳腺癌患者3种肿瘤标志物显著高于正常对照组及乳腺良性肿瘤组（P〈0.01）。3项标志物不同组合对不同分期乳腺癌检出的敏感性均高于单项标志物。其中CEA＋CA199＋CA153组合的检出敏感性较其他组合均高,特别是对早期患者检出率明显提高。结论：CEA＋CA199＋CA153联合检测能提高乳腺癌的早期诊断率。     

血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测在乳腺癌诊断中的价值

目的:探讨血清多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统在乳腺癌诊断中的临床价值。方法:临床确诊的乳腺癌患者307例为乳腺癌组,非乳腺癌的其他恶性肿瘤患者495例为对照组。应用多肿瘤标志物蛋白芯片检测系统检测12种肿瘤标志物水平,评价血清肿瘤标志物的在乳腺癌组与对照组之间的差异。结果:CA153,CEA,Free-PSA这三项指标为诊断乳腺癌的独立相关因素(P<0.05),比较三项指标ROC曲线下面积可见,CA153对于鉴别乳腺癌准确性更高,其敏感性、特异性分别为78.92和56.14,女性乳腺癌患者Free-PSA可见明显升高,对乳腺癌有特殊提示意义,手术前后标志物CA199、CA242、Ferrin、CA125水平差异有统计学意义。结论:在临床常用的肿瘤标记物中,CA153,CEA,Free_PSA水平的升高与乳腺癌发生独立相关,其中CA153具有更高的诊断准确性,Free_PSA水平升高对乳腺癌的诊断有特别提示意义。     

血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA199及CA153联合检测对肺癌的诊断价值

目的：评价血清CEA、CA199及CA153联合检测对肺癌诊断及分期的临床价值。方法：用化学发光分析法测定144例不同类型及分期的肺癌患者、92例肺良性疾病患者及76例健康体检者血清CEA、CA199及CA153水平的变化。结果：肺癌组血清CEA、CA199及CA153水平均高于正常对照组及肺良性疾病患者,有显著性差异,且TNM分期越晚,其水平越高;3项肿瘤标志联合检测可提高敏感性及准确性。结论：CEA、CA199及CA153联合检测可以为肺癌的诊断及分期提供有价值的实验室依据。     

胰腺癌患者血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平变化及联合诊断的ROC曲线分析

目的:探讨胰腺癌患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原242(CA242)、糖类抗原199(CA199)水平变化,并分析上述指标对胰腺癌的联合诊断价值,为胰腺癌的临床诊断提供参考。方法:选择2014年2月至2018年2月我院收治的186例胰腺癌患者(胰腺癌组)、89例胰腺炎患者(胰腺炎组)作为研究对象,并取同期来我院检查的268例健康人作为对照组。比较三组受试者的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平变化,对比分析血清CEA、CA242、CA199的单一以及联合诊断的准确度、特异度以及灵敏度,并绘制ROC曲线以分析上述指标的诊断价值。结果:三组受试者血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。且胰腺炎组和胰腺癌组的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平明显高于对照组,胰腺癌组患者的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平明显高于胰腺炎组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,CEA诊断价值最大,CA199诊断价值最小。CEA是胰腺癌单项肿瘤标志物中敏感度最高的,为85.48%;特异度最高的为CA242(96.72%);三项肿瘤标志物联合诊断的准确度增加至92.27%,敏感度增加至95.16%,特异度相比略有下降。结论:与单一肿瘤标记物诊断胰腺癌相比,CEA、CA242、CA199联合诊断的敏感度和准确度均明显升高,可以明显改善胰腺癌的漏诊率,提高患者的生存率,具有较好的临床应用价值。     

肺癌抗原标志物联合检测的临床应用

目的探讨肺癌抗原标志物联合检测的最佳组合。方法随机抽取200例确诊为原发性肺癌的患者,测定患者血液中多种肿瘤抗原标志物的水平,并进行统计学分析。结果检测的多项肿瘤标志物中CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1和CA125的阳性率相对较高;血清各标志物的表达与临床分期有关。结论联合检测CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1和CA125能提高肺癌患者的临床诊断准确率。     

CA125、CA199、CEA 联合检测在妇科肿瘤临床诊断中的应用价值

目的：探讨CA125、CA199、CEA联合检测在妇科肿瘤临床诊断中的应用价值。方法：选择妇科恶性肿瘤组65例、妇科良性肿瘤组55例、健康对照组70例,采用自动荧光磁微粒酶免分析法检测血清中CA199、CA125的含量,采用光激化学发光法检测血清中CEA的含量。结果：妇科恶性肿瘤组血清中CA125、CA199、CEA的水平明显高于妇科良性肿瘤组及对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;妇科良性肿瘤组血清中CA125、CA199、CEA的水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）;CA125、CA199、CEA联合检测对早期妇科肿瘤诊断的阳性率较单独检测高,差异有统计学意义（P〈O．05）;良性组、恶性组联合检测ROC曲线下面积大于单项检测曲线下面积。结论：联合检测可提高对妇科肿瘤早期诊断的阳性率,对妇科良恶性的诊断及鉴别诊断有重要价值。     

血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌辅助诊断中的应用

目的探讨血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中的临床价值。方法收集40例健康人、45例肺部良性疾病患者和90例肺癌患者,采用电化学发光分析检测患者血清中肿瘤标志物细胞角蛋白19(CYFRA21-1)、鳞状细胞癌相关抗原(SCC)和癌胚抗原(CEA),以及胃泌素释放肽前体(pro-GRP)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的含量。结果健康人组和肺部良性疾病患者组血清NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA水平较肺癌患者组水平低,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。NSE和pro-GRP在小细胞肺癌患者中的水平均明显高于其他类型的肺癌患者(P0.01),CYFRA21-1和SCC在鳞癌患者中的含量比其他类型肺癌患者高(P0.01)。联合检测此5种血清肿瘤标志物敏感性高于单独的肿瘤标志物(P0.01)。结论联合检测NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA可以提高肺癌诊断的灵敏度。     

血清PTH及肿瘤标志物在类风湿关节炎患者合并骨质疏松症诊断价值分析

摘要 目的：研究血清甲状旁腺激素（PTH）和肿瘤标志物对类风湿性关节炎合并骨质疏松症（RAOP）的诊断价值。方法：选取2019年1月-2021年12月在我院就诊的60例RAOP患者为研究对象,并选取同期在我院就诊的类风湿性关节炎（RA）患者作为对照。比较两组患者血清PTH、甲胎蛋白（AFP）、癌胚抗原（CEA）、癌抗原125（CA125）、癌抗原199（CA199）和癌抗原724（CA724）。通过pearsonr相关系数分析各指标的相关性,通过Logistic回归分析RAOP的影响因素和通过受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析各指标对RAOP的诊断价值。结果：（1）RAOP患者血清PTH、CA125和CA199水平均显著高于RA患者（P<0.05）,而血清CA724水平显著低于RA患者（P<0.05）,并且血清AFP和CEA水平与RA患者比较无差异（P>0.05）;（2）RAOP患者血清PTH与血清PTH水平与血清CA125和CA199水平呈正相关（P<0.05）,与血清CA724水平呈负相关（P<0.05）,与血清AFP和CEA水平不相关（P>0.05）;（3）Logistic回归分析显示：血清PTH、CA125、CA199、CA724是影响类风湿性关节炎合并骨质疏松症的独立影响因素（P<0.05）;（4）ROC曲线分析显示：血清PTH、CA125、CA199对RAOP具有诊断价值,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为90.00%和86.97%、80.36 %和78.97 %、75.62 %和75.12 %。结论：血清PTH、CA125和CA199在RAOP患者含量升高,是影响RAOP的独立危险因素,可作为诊断RAOP的指标。     

肿瘤标志物CEA、CA199对结直肠癌TNM分期的预判价值

目的:探讨肿瘤标志物CEA、CA199浓度变化在结直肠癌TNM分期中的预判价值。方法:回顾我院2010年1月~2013年10月收治的经手术治疗的结、直肠癌患者(共96例)的有关资料,分析其术前CEA、CA199浓度水平与术后病理确定TNM分期结果的相互关系,进行相应的统计学检测。结果:结直肠癌Ⅰ~Ⅳ期CEA浓度依次为4.28±1.78、6.92±2.01、23.99±6.49和362.64±158.80 ng/mL,CA199浓度依次为12.58±2.98、13.37±2.62、36.84±10.33和238.71±103.69 U/mL,肿瘤标志物CEA、CA199的浓度随TNM分期升级而增高,通过Kruskal-Wallis秩检验分析及Spearman秩相关分析,表明CEA、CA199的血清浓度与TNM分期明显相关(P0.01)。结论:CEA、CA199血清浓度与TNM分期呈正相关,而年龄与CEA、CA199在各期中的浓度无明显相关性。因此,应用CEA、CA199的血清学测定在一定程度上具有预判结直肠癌TNM分期的价值。     

Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population

Serum tumor biomarker carbohydrate antigen 724 (CA724) is noticeable for gastric cancer. Correlation between CA724 and gastric cancer was investigated based on Chinese population. Chinese Biomedical Database, Chinese Journal Full-text Database and PubMed were searched. Gastric cancer patients were proven by biopsy, and control included health volunteers or benign gastric diseases. Participants received at least one test of CA724, CA125, CA153, CA199, CA242 or CEA. Meta-analysis, summary ROC (SROC) and post hoc analysis were performed by RevMan 5.0 and SPSS 11.5. Totally, 33 eligible studies were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed CA724 had the highest odds ratio 32.86 compared to control, orderly followed by CA242, CA199, CEA, CA125 and CA153. Accumulated accuracy rate of CA724 was 77 %, superior to others. In SROC analysis, specificity of all studies was above 0.70, but sensitivity of few studies was above 0.70; CA724 was selected as the preferable single test, followed by CA242, CA199, CEA, CA125 and CA153. If threshold of both specificity and sensitivity up to 0.70, CA153 was unacceptable; if up to 0.80, only CA724 and CA242 were considerable. In CA724-combined patterns, CA724+CEA+CA199 combination performed best by increasing sensitivity to 0.74 without impairing specificity, while CA724 + CA199 pattern was not a proper combination. CA724 was the most correlative serum tumor biomarker for gastric cancer in Chinese population. Sensitivity of serum CA724 is limited, but CA724+CEA+CA199 combination is considerable to improve sensitivity without impairing specificity.     

The correlation between pre-operative serum tumor markers and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative treatment

Abstract

Background: There was few study concentrated on the correlation between the evaluated tumor markers and lymph node metastasis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the correlation between the CA724, CA242, CA199, CEA and the lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer and assess the prognostic value of them in different N stage patients.

Methods: We analyzed the correlation between serum level of CA724, CA242, CA199, CEA and lymph node metastasis in 1501 gastric cancer patients.

Results: Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer was related with tumor location, Bormann type, tumor size, histological type, depth of invasion and TNM stage (p?<?0.05). The values of CA724, CA242, CA199 and CEA were positively correlated with the metastatic lymph node counts and the N stage (p?<?0.05). The later the N stage was, the levels of CA724, CA242 and CA199 were higher. The later the N stage was, the positive rates of tumor markers were higher (p?<?0.05). In comparing with single tumor markers, the positive rates of tumor markers combination were higher. The combination of CA724?+?CA242?+?CA199?+?CEA had highest positive rate. The higher CEA level related to N1 stage patients while higher CA199 was related with poor prognosis for N1 stage patients. For N0 and N2 stage patients, evaluation of CA724 indicated poorer prognosis. For N1 and N2 stage gastric patients, the patients with increased CA242 inclined to have shorter survival time.

Conclusions: The tumor makers CA724, CA242, CA199 and CEA were evaluated significantly in the gastric patients with later N stage. The combination of these four tumor markers maybe prefer diagnostic index of gastric cancer and its lymph node metastasis. These tumor markers can be a possible indicator of poorer prognosis in different N stage patients.     

Assessment of the value of preoperative serum levels of CA 242 and CEA in the staging and postoperative survival of colorectal adenocarcinoma patients

INTRODUCTION: CEA is the most frequently used tumor marker in colorectal cancer. There may be an improvement in its efficacy when used in association with CA 242. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative serum levels of the tumor markers CA 242 and CEA in the staging and postoperative follow-up of colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of a series of 134 patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas 90 underwent radical surgery and 44 palliative surgery. The control group consisted of 22 organ donors. The cutoff serum levels utilized were 5 ng/mL for CEA and 20 U/mL for CA 242. The mortality during follow-up was recorded in order to determine the duration of survival. The data were submitted to statistical analysis using diagnostic tests, the chi-square test, survival analysis (Kaplan and Meier) and ROC curves. A significance level of p < or = 0.05 was applied. RESULTS: The sensitivity of CEA in Dukes' stages A, B, C and D was 27.8%, 32.4%, 32.1% and 66.7%, respectively. The sensitivity of CA 242 was 11.1%, 16.2%, 30.8% and 50%. When both markers were combined, the sensitivity was 33.3%, 48.6%, 40.7% and 72.5%. In the group of patients who underwent radical surgery the mean survival was 60.47 months for those with high preoperative CEA levels, 52.22 months for those with high preoperative CA 242 levels, and 44.80 months for those with elevated levels of both markers. There was a statistically significant difference in survival between patients undergoing radical surgery with elevated CA 242 levels, especially when CEA was also elevated, and patients without elevated CA 242. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum levels of CA 242 showed less efficacy than CEA levels for the staging of colorectal adenocarcinoma patients. Elevated preoperative serum levels of CA 242 alone were related to poor survival, especially in association with high levels of CEA.     

多种血清肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床意义分析

目的:探讨CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测对肺癌的诊、诊断的敏感度以及特异性。方法:对我院收治的确诊为肺癌的患者选取120例作为A组,同期选择肺部良性病变患者61例作为B组,以及50例健康体检患者作为C组,将三组研究对象分别进行CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的检测。结果:A组患者CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的血清中含量明显高于B组以及C组(P<0.05);五种标记物联合检测的敏感度明显高于单一标志物的敏感度(P<0.05),但其特异性有明显的降低(P<0.05)。结论:采用CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测,对肺癌的早期诊断以及治疗预后有较好的指导作用。