A reevaluation of new histone deposition on replicating chromatin

In this study, we have density-labeled newly replicated DNA in hepatoma tissue culture cells and separated the newly replicated nucleoprotein from bulk material using density gradient centrifugation. These experiments indicate that only newly synthesized histones H3 and H4 deposit specifically on newly replicated DNA. Histones H2A and H2B show a partial preference and histone H1 shows no preference for deposition on new DNA. These experiments also indicate that for a whole cell cycle, the non-H1 histones remain associated with the same DNA upon which they were initially deposited. However, when that region is replicated during the next cell cycle, the histones distribute equally to both daughter strands. An increase or decrease in the level of histone modification (acetylation) induced by sodium butyrate treatment does not alter the in vivo stability of the histone-DNA interactions. Experiments which involved labeling SV40 minichromosomes with [3H]lysine confirm our observations that only newly synthesized histone H3 and H4 are selectively depend on replicated DNA.     

Assembly of newly replicated chromatin.

Mild staphylococcal nuclease digestions under isotonic conditions release fragments of a 200 Å diameter fiber from nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster tissue culture cells. These soluble fragments have high sedimentation coefficients (30–100S) and show tightly packed nucleosomes in the electron microscope. Under the same conditions, newly replicated chromatin is released as more slowly sedimenting fragments (14S). Within 20 min after DNA replication, the nascent chromatin gradually matures into compact supranucleosomal structures which are indistinguishable from bulk chromatin on the isokinetic sucrose gradients.We have used this fractionation technique to examine the question of the fate and assembly of the new histones. After short pulses with either ³⁵S-methionine or ³H-lysine, the radioactive histones do not co-sediment with the bulk chromatin but appear instead in the fractions where the newly replicated DNA is found. Furthermore, the various nascent histones appear in different fractions on the gradient: histones H3 and H4 in 10–15S structures, histones H2A and H2B in 15–50S structures and histone H1 in 30–100S structures. These results, together with the analysis of pulse and pulse-chase experiments of both nascent DNA and histones, strongly suggest that histones H3 and H4 are deposited first on the nascent DNA (during or slightly after the DNA is replicated), histones H2A and H2B are deposited next (2–10 min later) and histone H1 is deposited last (10–20 min after DNA replication). A high turnover 20,000 dalton protein is also associated with the newly replicated chromatin.     

The sites of deposition of newly synthesized histone.

The chromosomal fragments produced by nuclease digestion of freshly replicated chromatin migrate more rapidly relative to bulk chromatin when analyzed in nucleoprotein gels. The cause of the anomalous migration has been studied and the evidence indicates that rather than reflecting a shorter nucleosomal repeat in vivo that it may be a consequence of nucleosome sliding during the digestion itself. The distinct electrophoretic characteristics of nucleosomal material containing newly replicated DNA have enabled us to examine their histone composition by two dimensional electrophoresis. We find that nucleosomes containing new DNA also contain newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. In contrast more than 50% of newly synthesized H2A and H2B, and essentially all of new H1, are deposited at sites on the bulk chromatin distinct from that material containing newly replicated DNA. In addition we show that newly synthesized histones H3 and H4 are bound unusually weakly when they first become associated with the chromatin.     

Temporal association of the herpes simplex virus genome with histone proteins during a lytic infection

Previous work has determined that there are nucleosomes on the herpes simplex virus (HSV) genome during a lytic infection but that they are not arranged in an equally spaced array like in cellular DNA. However, like in cellular DNA, the promoter regions of several viral genes have been shown to be associated with nucleosomes containing modified histone proteins that are generally found associated with actively transcribed genes. Furthermore, it has been found that the association of modified histones with the HSV genome can be detected at the earliest times postinfection (1 h postinfection) and increases up to 3 h postinfection. However from 3 h to 6 h postinfection (the late phase of the replication cycle), the association decreases. In this study we have examined histone association with promoter regions of all kinetic classes of genes. This was done over the time course of an infection in Sy5y cells using sucrose gradient sedimentation, bromodeoxyuridine labeling, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, Western blot analysis, trypsin and DNase digestion, and quantitative real-time PCR. Because no histones were detected inside HSV type 1 capsids, the viral genome probably starts to associate with histones after being transported from infecting virions into the host nucleus. Promoter regions of all gene classes (immediate early, early, and late) bind with histone proteins at the start of viral gene expression. However, after viral DNA replication initiates, histones appear not to associate with newly synthesized viral genomes.     

Changes in the histones of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus at fertilization

Both sperm and eggs of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus contain specific histones in place of some of the histones found during later development. Whether these specific histones are lost upon fertilization or are retained is not known. Therefore, we have examined the histones present in the zygote nucleus to determine the fate of the gamete histones. Nuclei of zygotes which have completed DNA replication in preparation for the first mitosis were isolated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. Histones were extracted from the isolated nuclei, and were analyzed by acid-urea and SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses, and by two-dimensional electrophoresis in which both gel electrophoresis systems were combined. Electrophoretic patterns of the zygote histones were compared with those of sperm, unfertilized eggs and embryos. The results show that the zygote histone pattern is identical with the unfertilized egg histone pattern. Neither the sperm histones H1, H2A, or H2B, nor the embryonic H1, H2A, or H2B, are present in the zygote pattern. The egg and the zygote do contain a unique H2A and H2B, but not an H1. After fertilization, sperm specific histones are not present on the DNA. Egg histones become associated with both the sperm DNA and the newly replicated DNA. The association of the embryonic histones with the DNA, therefore, occurs sometime later in development.     

Distribution of the core histones H2A.H2B.H3 and H4 during cell replication.

The distribution of newly synthesized core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 relative to the DNA strand synthesized in the same generation has been examined in replicating Chinese Hamster ovary cells. Cells are grown for one generation in [14C]-lysine and thymidine, and then for one generation in [3H]-lysine and 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrUdRib) and a further generation in unlabeled lysine and thymidine. This protocol produces equal amounts of unifilarly substituted and unsubstituted DNA. Monomer nucleosomes isolated from chromatin containing these two types of DNA can be distinguished by crosslinking with formaldehyde and banding to equilibrium in CsCl density gradients. The results indicate that the core histones are equally distributed between the two types of DNA. These findings are discussed in terms of current models for chromatin replication; they do not support any long term association of newly replicated histones with either the leading or lagging side of the replication fork.     

Polyoma Viral DNA Replicated as a Nucleoprotein Complex in Close Association with the Host Cell Chromatin

Polyoma viral DNA is shown to be replicated in close association with the mouse cell chromatin. Two virus-specific nucleoprotein complexes, designated complex A and B, can be dissociated from the isolated chromatin by gentle homogenization in 0.5 M NaCl. Complex A contains only replicating polyoma (Py) DNA whereas complex B contains only mature Py DNA I. The results show, furthermore, that complex A, containing viral DNA in different stages of replication, and complex B are both nucleoproteins with the same buoyant density. The data presently available suggest that newly synthesized stretches of Py DNA are immediately complexed with mouse cell histones and that complex B becomes the "core" of progeny Py virions. These results suggested that Py-induced replication of the mouse cell chromatin may be necessary to provide replicating Py DNA with histones.     

Core histones H2B and H4 are mobilized during infection with herpes simplex virus 1

The infecting genomes of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) are assembled into unstable nucleosomes soon after nuclear entry. The source of the histones that bind to these genomes has yet to be addressed. However, infection inhibits histone synthesis. The histones that bind to HSV-1 genomes are therefore most likely those previously bound in cellular chromatin. In order for preexisting cellular histones to associate with HSV-1 genomes, however, they must first disassociate from cellular chromatin. Consistently, we have shown that linker histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection. Chromatinization of HSV-1 genomes would also require the association of core histones. We therefore evaluated the mobility of the core histones H2B and H4 as measures of the mobilization of H2A-H2B dimers and the more stable H3-H4 core tetramer. H2B and H4 were mobilized during infection. Their mobilization increased the levels of H2B and H4 in the free pools and decreased the rate of H2B fast chromatin exchange. The histones in the free pools would then be available to bind to HSV-1 genomes. The mobilization of H2B occurred independently from HSV-1 protein expression or DNA replication although expression of HSV-1 immediate-early (IE) or early (E) proteins enhanced it. The mobilization of core histones H2B and H4 supports a model in which the histones that associate with HSV-1 genomes are those that were previously bound in cellular chromatin. Moreover, this mobilization is consistent with the assembly of H2A-H2B and H3-H4 dimers into unstable nucleosomes with HSV-1 genomes.     

Preferential association of newly synthesized histones with replicating SV40 DNA.

The assembly of newly synthesized histones into nucleosomes during replication of SV40 minichromosomes in vivo was studied. Infected cells were labeled with 35S-methionine for a time shorter than that required to complete a round of viral DNA replication. Mature and replicating SV40 minichromosomes were extracted and separated by zonal sedimentation, and their histone content was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS and acidic urea). We show that the pulse-labeled histones associate preferentially with the replicating DNA.     

Histone synthesis and deposition in the G1 and S phases of hepatoma tissue culture cells

Hepatoma tissue culture cells were synchronized in G1 and in S phase in order to examine the level of synthesis of different histone types and to determine the rate, timing, and location of their deposition onto DNA. We observe a basal level of synthesis in G1 (5% of that seen in S phase) for H2A.1, H2A.2, H3.2, H2B, and H4. The minor histone variants X and Z are synthesized at 30% of the rate observed in S cells. The rate of synthesis of the ubiquinated histones uH2A.1,2 is not as depressed in G1 cells as seen for H2A.1 and H2A.2. Histones synthesized in G1 are not deposited on the DNA of these cells at equivalent rates. Thus, histones H3.2 and H4 are not deposited significantly until S phase begins, at which time deposition occurs selectively on newly synthesized DNA. The deposition of H2A.1, H2A.2, H2B, X, and Z proceeds in G1; however, it occurs to a 2-4-fold lower extent than seen for the deposition of H1, HMG 14, and HMG 17. The deposition of all histones synthesized in S phase occurs rapidly, but there are variations in the sites of deposition. Thus, newly synthesized H3.1, H3.2, and H4 deposit primarily on newly replicated DNA whereas H2A.1, H2A.2, uH2A.1, 2, and H2B deposit only partially on new DNA (30%) and mostly on old. H1, HMG 14, and HMG 17 are deposited in an apparently fully random manner over the chromatin. To interpret these observations, we propose a model which includes a measure of histone exchange on the chromatin fiber. The model emphasizes the dynamics of histone-histone and histone-DNA interactions in regions of active genes and at replication forks.     

The Differential Mobilization of Histones H3.1 and H3.3 by Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Relates Histone Dynamics to the Assembly of Viral Chromatin

During lytic infections, HSV-1 genomes are assembled into unstable nucleosomes. The histones required for HSV-1 chromatin assembly, however, are in the cellular chromatin. We have shown that linker (H1) and core (H2B and H4) histones are mobilized during HSV-1 infection, and proposed that the mobilized histones are available for assembly into viral chromatin. However, the actual relevance of histone mobilization remained unknown. We now show that canonical H3.1 and variant H3.3 are also mobilized during HSV-1 infection. Mobilization required no HSV-1 protein expression, although immediate early or early proteins enhanced it. We used the previously known differential association of H3.3 and H3.1 with HSV-1 DNA to test the relevance of histone mobilization. H3.3 binds to HSV-1 genomes first, whereas H3.1 only binds after HSV-1 DNA replication initiates. Consistently, H3.3 and H3.1 were differentially mobilized. H3.1 mobilization decreased with HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 mobilization was largely unaffected by it. These results support a model in which previously mobilized H3.1 is immobilized by assembly into viral chromatin during HSV-1 DNA replication, whereas H3.3 is mobilized and assembled into HSV-1 chromatin throughout infection. The differential mobilizations of H3.3 and H3.1 are consistent with their differential assembly into viral chromatin. These data therefore relate nuclear histone dynamics to the composition of viral chromatin and provide the first evidence that histone mobilization relates to viral chromatin assembly.     

Stepwise assembly of chromatin during DNA replication in vitro.

A cell free system that supports replication-dependent chromatin assembly has been used to determine the mechanism of histone deposition during DNA replication. CAF-I, a human cell nuclear factor, promotes chromatin assembly on replicating SV40 DNA in the presence of a crude cytosol replication extract. Biochemical fractionation of the cytosol extract has allowed separation of the chromatin assembly reaction into two steps. During the first step, CAF-I targets the deposition of newly synthesized histones H3 and H4 to the replicating DNA. This reaction is dependent upon and coupled with DNA replication, and utilizes the newly synthesized forms of histones H3 and H4, which unlike bulk histone found in chromatin, do not bind to DNA by themselves. The H3/H4-replicated DNA complex is a stable intermediate which exhibits a micrococcal nuclease resistant structure and can be isolated by sucrose gradient sedimentation. In the second step, this replicated precursor is converted to mature chromatin by the addition of histones H2A and H2B in a reaction that can occur after DNA replication. The requirement for CAF-I in at least the first step of the reaction suggests a level of cellular control for this fundamental process.     

Fate of newly synthesized histones shortly after interruption of DNA replication

The synthesis and association of histones with chromatin were studied using MH-134SC cells in suspension culture. Cultures containing approximately equal numbers of cells were pulse-labeled with [3H]lysine at various times after the interruption of DNA synthesis with hydroxyurea. Each culture was mixed with a fixed volume of a culture generally labeled with [14C]lysine at the time of harvesting. Acid-soluble proteins extracted from different subcellular fractions of cells labeled under various conditions were compared by electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gels containing acetic acid and urea. All types of chromatin histones were labeled nearly equally as [14C]marker histones by a 15 min pulse under normal conditions, except that a considerable portion of pulse-labeled H4 was in highly acetylated forms. Addition of hydroxyurea at the start of the pulse markedly reduced the labeling of H3 and H4, but affected the labeling of the other histones only slightly. When DNA synthesis was inhibited before the start of the pulse, labeling of all histones decreased significantly. The addition of hydroxyurea was found to cause transient accumulation of newly synthesized proteins in the cytoplasmic soluble fraction; these were characterized as H3 and H4 from their metabolic properties and their electrophoretic mobilities on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. The results suggest that association of newly synthesized H3 and H4 histones is closely coupled with ongoing DNA replication. The implications of the results for the mechanism of formation of new nucleosomes are discussed.