生态风险分析在农田肥力评价中的应用

生态风险分析属于生态学研究的热点问题之一。本文探讨了生态风险的内涵,定义了生态系统的风险：生态系统的风险是其生态因子所导致的不良事件发生的概率及其后果的严重程度。研究了农田生态系统产生的生态风险——土壤肥力退化风险,将生态风险的理论引进农田生态系统的风险评价中．建立了风险评价指标体系．构建了土壤肥力风险评价的实用数学模型,给出了一种度量土壤肥力风险的简单、合理的科学方法．并就具体实例进行了分析研究。计算结果表明,在评价地区所选的24个样区中,生态风险很大者占样区总数的12．5％,生态风险较大的占33．3％．生态风险一般的占37．5％．风险较小的占16．7％。其中风险很大和较大的一些样区,应是所论样区中土壤改良治理的重点样区。就各样区不同土壤肥力因子存在的风险也给出了定量结果。以上风险分析结果,为土壤肥力风险评价和土壤改良治理提供了定量依据。     

南宁吴圩国际机场春季鸟类鸟撞风险分析

机场的鸟类由于其所处位置的特殊性,会对飞行安全造成一定威胁.本文结合南宁吴圩国际机场的实际情况,详细记录了春季机场内出现的各种鸟类的种类、数量、活动高度、出现频率4个指标,并采用多元统计中的主成分分析法对数据进行分析.结果 表明:遇见频次和密度在贡献率最高的第1主成分中得分最高,可见这两个因子在鸟撞风险评价中起决定性作用;而鸟类个体大小和活动高度在贡献率较高的第2主成分中得分较高,所以这两个因子虽然对鸟撞风险大小有一定影响但不具主导地位.根据各种鸟类的密度和遇见频次进行聚类分析,将44种鸟进行了鸟撞风险大小划分,结果表明:乌鸫、极北柳莺等18种鸟属于风险较小的类群,占总数的40.91%;长尾缝叶莺、白腰雨燕等10种鸟属于风险一般的类群,占总数的22.73%;黑翅鸢、金腰燕等14种鸟属于风险较大的类群,占总数的31.82%;白鹭和棕背伯劳2种属于风险很大的鸟类,占总数的4.54%.分析结果为机场方面进行鸟撞防治工作提供了依据.     

合肥新桥国际机场鸟类多样性及鸟击风险评价

鸟类多样性研究对于新建机场开展鸟击防范工作具有指导意义。2012年2月到2013年1月,采用样线调查法对新建合肥新桥国际机场及其周边地区鸟类进行了调查,根据鸟类相对数量、遇见频率、生境利用率和飞行高度,对机场鸟类鸟击风险进行评价。共记录到鸟类79种,其中留鸟34种,夏候鸟21种,冬候鸟和旅鸟分别为12种和11种;食虫鸟35种,食谷鸟8种,杂食性鸟15种,肉食性鸟21种。在各类生境中以林地的鸟类密度(D=10.25ind·hm-2)和Shannon-Wiener指数(H'=2.12)最高。全年以秋季鸟类密度(D=9.23ind·hm-2)、Shannon-Wiener指数(H'=2.13)最高。新桥机场鸟击风险高的鸟类共23种,飞行区内(R≥40)12种,飞行区外(R≥40)21种;其中留鸟占60%,食虫鸟占52%。加强对留鸟和食虫鸟的管理,采取生态防治和综合防治措施,对于降低机场鸟击风险具有积极意义。     

豫北黄河故道湿地岛类自然保护区鸟类区系调查

1997－1999年对豫北黄河故道湿地鸟类自然保护区的鸟类进行了调查,共记录鸟类119种,隶属16目37科,其中留鸟32种,占总数的26．89％,冬候鸟24种,占总数的20．17％,夏候鸟30种,占总数的25．21％,旅鸟占33种,占总数的27．73％,国家一级重点保护鸟类2种,二级重点保护鸟类19种,河南省重点保护的鸟类6种。     

评估动物栖息地适宜性的两种方法比较:以大相岭山系大熊猫种群为例

采用景观因索赋值法（方法Ⅰ）和主成分分析法（方法Ⅱ）对大相岭山系大熊猫栖息地进行评价,结果表明。方法Ⅰ的结果中中等适宜、适宜等级和最适宜等级所占的面积分别为94．62、45．46和0．21km^2,分别占总面积的4．17％、2．00％和0．01％;而方法Ⅱ的结果中,中等适宜和适宜等级所占的面积分别为623．03和170.27km^2,分别占总面积的27.49％和7．51％。结合实际调查数据和景观因素,发现2种方法均能对大相岭山系大熊猫生境进行评价。但差异较大。方法Ⅰ评判因索较少。各因素所占比重较大,因索对整个评价结果影响很大,评价结果不精确,但所需人力、物力较少;方法Ⅱ所需评判因素较多,野外搜集所需资料困难,累计贡献率很难达到95％。而且需要大量的人力、物力。因此。为了减少评估误差。应将2种方法结合对动物生境进行评估。     

江西珍稀濒危植物优先保护定量研究

以江西省50种珍稀濒危植物为定量研究对象,采用以濒危系数、遗传价值系数、物种价值系数和生物学特征系数4个指标构成的珍稀濒危植物等级综合评价值的方法对上述植物优先保护顺序进行了定量研究。对50种珍稀植物进行排序的结果基本符合《中国珍稀濒危植物》和《中国植物红皮书》第1册的分析,但也有不同：属一级保护的有长柄双花木、天目木姜子和长序榆等共10种,占研究物种总数的20．00％,其中有浙江楠和华东黄杉等2渐危种;二级保护的有胡豆莲、连香树、伯乐树、银钟花等共26种,占52．00％,其中胡豆莲属于濒危种;三级的有小花木兰、观光木等12种,占24．00％,其中有4种属稀有种,8种属渐危种;此外,八角莲、野大豆等在江西可以暂不列入保护,这两者均属渐危种,占4．00％。     

重庆江北机场鸟类群落结构及鸟击防范

鸟击对民用和军用飞机的飞行安全构成严重威胁,了解和掌握机场及其周边地区的鸟类群落结构对机场开展鸟击防范工作具有重要意义。本研究于2013年6月至2014年5月,采用固定距离样线法对重庆江北机场以机场中心为圆心、半径8 km范围内的区域进行鸟类多样性调查。共记录鸟类102种,隶属于15目、40科。其中留鸟44种,夏候鸟30种,冬候鸟13种,旅鸟15种;雀形目鸟类占绝对优势,计54种,占调查鸟类物种总数的52.94%。对鸟类群落结构分析结果表明,冬季密度最大,夏季最低;秋季的多样性指数最高,夏季最低;春季的均匀度指数最高,夏季最低;夏季的优势度指数最高,秋季最低。结合鸟类的密度D值、分布系数ADC值、鸟击风险值R、相对风险比例RE以及鸟类生活习性等综合分析,与鸟击发生关系密切的鸟种为家燕(Hirundo rustica)、灰椋鸟(Sturnus cineraceus)、八哥(Acridotheres cristatellus)、黑卷尾(Dicrurus macrocercus)、金翅(Carduelis spinus)、珠颈斑鸠(Phasianus colchicus)以及人工饲养物种家鸽(Columba domestica)等,根据调查结果对重庆江北机场的鸟击防范工作提出了综合防治建议。     

云南沧源佤山机场鸟类多样性及鸟击风险评估

鸟击防范是民航机场保障航空飞行安全的重要工作。及时收集新建机场鸟情数据、开展鸟击风险评估,对机场鸟防工作有重要意义。云南沧源佤山机场在2016年末通航,2017年8月—2018年4月对其锥形面区域的鸟类进行了为期1年的调查,以掌握机场周边鸟类多样性的本底状况,并根据鸟类的数量、个体大小、遇见频次、生境利用率和飞行高度等5项指标,对每种鸟在不同季节的鸟击风险进行了评估。结果表明,佤山机场周边有野生鸟类13目46科164种,其中留鸟占73.8%。鸟类群落组成具有明显的季节性变化,物种数:春季冬季夏季秋季。基于风险等级评估方法,确定了以留鸟为主的13种高风险鸟类。根据这些鸟类的生态特征,提出了佤山机场的鸟防建议。     

太原武宿国际机场鸟类多样性特征及鸟击防控

机场周边区域鸟类的活动给飞行安全造成了潜在的风险,掌握机场鸟类的多样性特征对开展鸟击防控工作有重要的指示意义。于2018年10月—2019年8月,采用样线法与网捕法对太原武宿国际机场飞行区与净空区进行了鸟类多样性调查。共记录到鸟类75种,隶属于13目31科,其中繁殖鸟占60%,非繁殖鸟占40%。用EstimateS软件对调查范围内鸟类丰富度进行估计,ACE值(81种),ICE值(98种),表明覆盖了调查范围内鸟类中76.53%～92.59%的物种,显示了较好的调查效果。为了明确所调查鸟类对鸟击防控工作的影响,根据这些鸟种的重要值(IV)与风险系数计算其危险指数。机场全年发生严重危险的鸟种有斑嘴鸭(Anas zonorhyncha)、家燕(Hirundo rustica)、绿头鸭(Anas platyrhynchos)、喜鹊(Pica pica)、环颈雉(Phasianus colchicus)、家鸽(Columba domestica)、珠颈斑鸠(Streptopelia chinensis)等10种。6种不同生境的鸟类群落多样性聚类分析表明:受人为干扰较大的生境类型为居民点和道路绿化带,其物种多样性较低(H=1.35±0.08);另外4种生境即机场草坪、水塘-滩涂、农田及人工林地受人为干扰较小,其物种多样性(H=1.66±0.04)较高。为此,在机场的鸟击防范工作中,要针对性地开展机场周边生态环境治理,制定靶向性的防控策略来应对危险鸟类在机场区域的活动。     

豫北黄河故道湿地鸟类自然保护区鸟类区系调查

1997～1999年对豫北黄河故道湿地鸟类自然保护区的鸟类进行了调查,共记录鸟类119种,隶属16目37科。其中留鸟32种,占总数的26.89％;冬候鸟 24种,占总数的20.17％; 夏候鸟30种,占总数的25.21％; 旅鸟33种,占总数的27.73％。国家一级重点保护鸟类2种,二级重点保护鸟类19种,河南省重点保护的鸟类6种。     

Actual and perceived collision risk for bird strikes at Namibian airports

At Namibia’s two major airports, Hosea Kutako International and Eros (domestic), 117 bird strike collision incidents were recorded between 2006 and 2010. A risk assessment, which included a proposed risk weighting methodology, was conducted at Hosea Kutako and Eros airports, which estimated the probability of an accident/collision as well as the consequence of such a collision. The assessment included surveys of bird occurrence frequencies as well as pilot interviews. The results of the risk assessments were compared with actual bird strike incidences for each species, frequency of occurrence of birds and pilot perceptions of species risk, in order to find whether risk assessment and pilot perception are reliable measures of potential bird strike incidence. White-backed Vulture Gyps africanus and Helmeted Guineafowl Numida meleagris were the highest risk species at both airports. They were also, after Crowned Lapwing Vanellus coronatus, the species most often observed by pilots. Bird strike records showed that Crowned Lapwing and Helmeted Guineafowl were also the most frequently struck birds at both airports. The study illustrates how combining risk assessment, pilot perception and bird strike history can benefit bird strike minimisation plans at airports through the rapid identification of priority bird species.     

沈阳桃仙国际机场鸟类夜间迁徙规律

在鸟类迁徙季节,夜间鸟击事故频发是机场鸟击发生的一个显著特点.了解鸟类的夜间迁徙规律对于改进夜间鸟击防范措施具有重要的指导意义.本研究综合采用网捕法和声音记录法对沈阳桃仙机场夜间鸟类迁徙物种组成和迁徙规律进行研究.结果表明: 56种鸟类(占比88.9%)具有夜间迁徙习性,且以后半夜迁徙为主;鸟类夜间迁徙具有明显的时间动态和迁徙次序,春季鸟类迁徙较为集中,迁徙高峰在5月中旬,主要鸟类由鹌鹑、红尾伯劳、栗耳鹀、黑喉石鵖、普通夜鹰、黄眉柳莺等组成,秋季迁徙较为分散,迁徙高峰出现在9月下旬至10月上旬,主要由鹌鹑、灰背鸫、红喉鹨、丘鹬、矛斑蝗莺和灰头鵐等组成.对夜间迁徙鸟类的危险等级评估发现,春季严重危险物种是鹌鹑和红尾伯劳,秋季严重危险物种是鹌鹑、纵纹腹小鸮、灰背鸫和丘鹬.分别从夜间迁徙鸟类组成、迁徙动态、时间节律和物种危险等级等角度提出了相应的鸟击防范对策,为桃仙机场鸟击防范提供参考.     

An ecological approach to birdstrike risk analysis

Airports are peculiar developed habitats that, besides being extremely noisy and unappealing to some bird species, are highly attractive to others. Bird–aircraft collisions, or birdstrikes, cause losses in terms of human lives, direct monetary losses and associated costs for the civil aviation industry. In recent years, birdstrike risk assessment studies have focused on the economical aspects of the damage caused by wild animals and the hazards of wildlife–aircraft collisions, while an ecological approach, taking into account animal behaviour for the analysis of such events, has seldom been adopted. We conducted a risk analysis for birdstrikes at the Venice Marco Polo International Airport (VCE), Italy. We defined the key variables involved in these events and summarised their interactions in a single metric risk index we called the “Birdstrike Risk Index” (BRI). Our aim was to provide a tool for birdstrike risk analysis that described the risk on the basis of the actual presence of birds at airports. The application of the BRI at VCE allows relative risks across species to be defined, providing information for prioritising management actions. Furthermore, due to the seasonality of bird species presences, the application of the BRI to a long-term data series should give clues of birdstrike risk in future scenarios. This new ecological approach that we applied to a particular airport could easily be adapted for use at other airports worldwide and integrated into risk assessment procedures. The study results and the BRI tool are addressed to scientific consultants of airport safety managers.     

样线法和网捕法在机场鸟情调查中的应用比较

鸟击事件主要发生在机场范围内,对机场周边生境的鸟类组成进行调查,是制定鸟击防范对策的重要前提。国内多数机场已经开展了相关的鸟类组成调查,但是选用的调查方法却存在较大差异。以样线法和网捕法两种常用的调查方法对沈阳桃仙国际机场周边的迁徙期鸟类进行了研究,旨在比较两种调查方法在机场鸟类群落组成调查中的效果及调查的鸟类群落组成差异。结果表明：两种方法均适合机场鸟类调研,共记录到鸟类97种,网捕法记录的鸟类种数（83种vs.57种）高于样线法,网捕法单独记录的鸟类种数（40种vs.14种）也高于样线法。尽管两种方法每期（半个月）调查的物种数和目的数量无明显差别,但随调查强度（如调查次数）增加,网捕法累计记录到的鸟类种类明显高于样线法,且较晚达到渐近线。另外,两种方法调查记录的鸟类群落组成也具有显著的差别,如网捕法记录到较多鹌鹑和鸮形目等夜间迁徙或活动鸟类,而样线法可记录到鹭科和雁鸭类水鸟等。这说明两种调研方法在鸟类调查中有较好的互补性。因此,本研究认为机场鸟情调研时应该根据鸟情特点,选择合适的鸟类调研方法,综合采用多种调研方法可更有利于获得科学的鸟情信息。     

煤气炮和声波驱鸟器有效距离的评估

鸟击事故主要发生在机场区域,通过使用驱鸟设备减少机场鸟类活动是预防鸟击的主要措施之一。本研究以家鸽和红隼两种高危险鸟类作为受试对象,选择沈阳桃仙国际机场使用的煤气炮和定向声波驱鸟器,观察在设备正常运行期间鸟类位于不同距离上的行为反应,探究两种驱鸟设备的有效作用距离以及效果。结果表明: 家鸽和红隼在距离煤气炮驱鸟器10、30 m时的警戒、逃跑行为显著高于对照,而在50 m处的各种行为次数与对照没有显著差别。家鸽和红隼在距离定向声波驱鸟器50、100 m时能够显著引起警戒和逃跑行为,在300 m处仍能显著引起红隼的警戒行为。可见,煤气炮的有效驱鸟距离为30 m,定向声波的有效驱鸟距离可达300 m,即定向声波的驱鸟效果要强于煤气炮。本研究可为机场引进驱鸟设备以及合理使用提供依据。     

Investigating Vietnam��s Ornamental Bird Trade: Implications for Transmission of Zoonoses

Global wildlife trade is financially lucrative, frequently illegal and increases the risk for zoonotic disease transmission. This paper presents the first interdisciplinary study of Vietnam’s illegal wild bird trade focussing on those aspects which may contribute to the transmission of diseases such as Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1. Comparing January 2009 data with that of May 2007, we found a five-fold increase to 9,117 birds on sale in Hanoi. Ninety-five percent of Hanoian bird vendors appear unaware of trade regulations and across Vietnam vendors buy birds sourced outside of their province. Approximately 25% of the species common to Vietnam’s bird trade are known to be HPAI H5N1 susceptible. The anthropogenic movement of birds within the trade chain and the range of HPAI-susceptible species, often traded alongside poultry, increase the risk Vietnam’s bird trade presents for the transmission of pathogens such as HPAI H5N1. These results will assist in the control and monitoring of emerging zoonotic diseases and conservation of Southeast Asia’s avifauna.     

北京雾灵山自然保护区冬季鸟类物种多样性调查

采用固定调查样线法连续两年对北京雾灵山自然保护区冬季鸟类组成进行了调查,共记录鸟类7目14科44种,其中29种属于留鸟,5种为冬候鸟,7种旅鸟,3种夏候鸟;优势种以留鸟为主,表现出冬季鸟类群落的特点。古北界和东洋界的种类分别为75％和14％,在分布型上划分为7种类型。出现种类最多的生态环境是村落,鸟类种数为31种,其植被类型是低山砾石、农田林果带。调查种类中有国家一级保护鸟类1种,二级保护鸟类6种,北京市重点保护鸟类6种。通过与邻近地区相关调查比较,表明本区冬季鸟类具有较高的丰富性,并提出了有效保护鸟类多样性的对策。     

Factors associated with returns of snowy owls to airports following translocation

Human-dominated environments often include ecological traps for wildlife, such as airports that may be perceived as suitable habitat by grassland birds but reduce fitness because of collisions with aircraft. Birds of prey are often attracted to airports where collisions with aircraft (i.e., bird strikes) are usually fatal for the birds and are a significant threat to flight safety. The snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus) is known for its nomadism, exhibiting unpredictable and highly variable movements during the nonbreeding season, including being a common visitor to airports, which often have high small-mammal populations and mimic flat, open habitats used naturally by owls. Since 2009, the Federal Aviation Administration reported an average of 22 snowy owl deaths annually due to aircraft collisions throughout 55 North American airports. To aid in active management of owls at airports, we assessed relocation data of 42 telemetry-tracked snowy owls from 2000–2020 in the United States and Canada. Owls that returned to the airport after relocation (33%) frequently crisscrossed and perched near runways where they were at risk of strikes. Adult females and immature males were more likely to return than the other sex and age classes, and returns were less likely to occur as the distance between the release site and the airport increased. Owls relocated in open habitats with a greater proportion of wetland and cropland (including grasslands and pasture) land cover classes were also less likely to return. We conclude that inclusion of multiple factors to limit return rates of relocated snowy owls from airport facilities can unspring the ecological trap presented by airports to these owls.     

Ranking birdstrike risk: A case study at Huanghua International Airport, Changsha, China

Bird-aircraft collisions (birdstrikes) pose a major threat to aviation safety worldwide. The bird distribution at the airfield of Huanghua International Airport in Changsha, Hunan Province, China, was investigated between December of 2006 and December of 2008, to study birdstrike avoidance and aviation safety. A total of 60 bird species was found and their risks were assessed by a birdstrike ranking assessment system. The highest-risk species were Barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), Red-rumped swallow (H. daurica), Grey-headed lapwing (Vanellus cinereus), Pintail snipe (Gallinago stenura), Oriental skylark (Alauda gulgula), Little egret (Egretta garzetta), and Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), whereas the lowest-risk species were Black-capped kingfisher (Halcyon pileata) and White-throated kingfisher (H. smyrnensis). Through a hierarchical cluster analysis, all species were classified as four groups: (1) the extremely high-risk group with a risk level between 84% and 100%, which includes bird species ranked from the 1st to the 16th, and is the priori group in birdstrike prevention; (2) the high-risk group with a risk level between 71% and 81%, which includes bird species ranked from the 17th to the 28th, and is the sub-prior group in birdstrikes; (3) the sub-high-risk group with a risk level between 60% and 69%, which includes bird species ranked from the 29th to the 43rd, and is the concern group in birdstrike prevention; (4) the low-risk group with a risk level between 60% and 69%, which includes bird species ranked from the 44th to the 60th, and is the negligible group in birdstrike prevention. Finally, the first 16 bird species with high-risk values, which are the main focus of birdstrike prevention, were categorized as six prevention groups by a hierarchical cluster analysis. Therefore, this study provides targeted implementations for birdstrike prevention at Huanghua International Airport, Changsha.     

Ranking birdstrike risk: A case study at Huanghua International Airport, Changsha, China

Bird-aircraft collisions (birdstrikes) pose a major threat to aviation safety worldwide. The bird distribution at the airfield of Huanghua International Airport in Changsha, Hunan Province, China, was investigated between December of 2006 and December of 2008, to study birdstrike avoidance and aviation safety. A total of 60 bird species was found and their risks were assessed by a birdstrike ranking assessment system. The highest-risk species were Barn swallow (Hirundo rustica), Red-rumped swallow (H. daurica), Grey-headed lapwing (Vanellus cinereus), Pintail snipe (Gallinago stenura), Oriental skylark (Alauda gulgula), Little egret (Egretta garzetta), and Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), whereas the lowest-risk species were Black-capped kingfisher (Halcyon pileata) and White-throated kingfisher (H. smyrnensis). Through a hierarchical cluster analysis, all species were classified as four groups: (1) the extremely high-risk group with a risk level between 84% and 100%, which includes bird species ranked from the 1st to the 16th, and is the priori group in birdstrike prevention; (2) the high-risk group with a risk level between 71% and 81%, which includes bird species ranked from the 17th to the 28th, and is the sub-prior group in birdstrikes; (3) the sub-high-risk group with a risk level between 60% and 69%, which includes bird species ranked from the 29th to the 43rd, and is the concern group in birdstrike prevention; (4) the low-risk group with a risk level between 60% and 69%, which includes bird species ranked from the 44th to the 60th, and is the negligible group in birdstrike prevention. Finally, the first 16 bird species with high-risk values, which are the main focus of birdstrike prevention, were categorized as six prevention groups by a hierarchical cluster analysis. Therefore, this study provides targeted implementations for birdstrike prevention at Huanghua International Airport, Changsha.