Influenza vaccination,pneumococcal vaccination and risk of acute myocardial infarction: matched case–control study

Background

Previous studies have shown an association between acute myocardial infarction and preceding respiratory infection. Contradictory evidence exists on the influence of influenza vaccination and pneumococcal vaccination in preventing cardiovascular disease. We aimed to investigate the possible association of influenza vaccination and pneumococcal vaccination with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

We used a matched case–control design with data from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database. Cases were patients who were at least 40 years of age at diagnosis of first acute myocardial infarction recorded from Nov.1, 2001, to May 31, 2007, and were matched for sex, general practice, age and calendar time (i.e., month corresponding to index date of acute myocardial infarction), with up to four controls each. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for vaccination target groups, cardiovascular risk factors, treatment medications and attendances at a general practice.

Results

We included 78 706 patients, of whom 16 012 were cases and 62 694 were matched controls. Influenza vaccination had been received in the previous year by 8472 cases (52.9%) and 32 081 controls (51.2%) and was associated with a 19% reduction in the rate of acute myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–0.85). Early seasonal influenza vaccination was associated with a lower rate of acute myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75–0.83) than vaccination after mid-November (adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79–0.97). Pneumococcal vaccination was not associated with a reduction in the rate of acute myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91–1.02).

Interpretation

Influenza vaccination but not pneumococcal vaccination is associated with a reduced rate of first acute myocardial infarction. This association and the potential benefit of early seasonal vaccination need to be considered in future experimental studies.Winter peaks in incidence of acute myocardial infarction have been linked to climate,¹ metabolic factors² and infection.³ Because known risk factors do not fully account for cases of acute myocardial infarction, current interest is focused on the putative link with respiratory infection. Significant increases in acute myocardial infarction occur during peak winter incidence of pneumonia, influenza and influenza-like syndrome,⁴ particularly during years dominated by epidemic rather than nonepidemic influenza A. This association supports the notion that the increase is caused by influenza rather than cold weather.⁵Acute myocardial infarction may increase susceptibility to respiratory illness,⁶ but the association between acute myocardial infarction and respiratory infection occurring within four weeks prior to the acute myocardial infarction^7,8 supports infection as a cause of acute myocardial infarction. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, the favoured hypothesis is that infection triggers plaque rupture.⁹ Although several observational studies, as well as two randomized controlled trials,^10,11 suggest a positive effect of influenza vaccine in preventing acute myocardial infarction, they provide insufficient and conflicting evidence.¹²The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between influenza or pneumococcal vaccination and acute myocardial infarction.     

The effect of a charted history of depression on emergency department triage and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Background

Patients with acute myocardial infarction may have worse outcomes if they also have a history of depression. The early management of acute myocardial infarction is known to influence outcomes, and patients with a coexisting history of depression may be treated differently in the emergency department than those without one. Our goal was to determine whether having a charted history of depression was associated with a lower-priority emergency department triage score and worse performance on quality-of-care indices.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort analysis involving patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 96 acute care hospitals in the province of Ontario from April 2004 to March 2005. We calculated the adjusted odds of low-priority triage (Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale score of 3, 4 or 5) for patients with acute myocardial infarction who had a charted history of depression. We compared these odds with those for patients having a charted history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Secondary outcome measures were the odds of meeting benchmark door-to-electrocardiogram, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times.

Results

Of 6784 patients with acute myocardial infarction, 680 (10.0%) had a past medical history of depression documented in their chart. Of these patients, 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35.3%–42.9%) were assigned a low-priority triage score, as compared with 32.7% (95% CI 31.5%–33.9%) of those without a charted history of depression. The adjusted odds of receiving a low-priority triage score with a charted history of depression were 1.26 (p = 0.01) versus 0.88 (p = 0.23) with asthma and 1.12 (p = 0.24) with COPD. For patients with a charted history of depression, the median door-to-electrocardiogram time was 20.0 minutes (v. 17.0 min for the rest of the cohort), median door-to-needle time was 53.0 (v. 37.0) minutes, and median door-to-balloon time was 251.0 (v. 110.0) minutes. The adjusted odds of missing the benchmark time with a charted history of depression were 1.39 (p < 0.001) for door-to-electrocardiogram time, 1.62 (p = 0.047) for door-to-needle time and 9.12 (p = 0.019) for door-to-balloon time.

Interpretation

Patients with acute myocardial infarction who had a charted history of depression were more likely to receive a low-priority emergency department triage score than those with other comorbidities and to have worse associated performance on quality indicators in acute myocardial infarction care.In the United States, more than six million patients with conditions related to mental health are seen each year in the nation’s emergency departments.¹ Some of these comprise the six million patients with chest pain who are also seen annually in the emergency department.² Several studies have suggested that patients with acute myocardial infarction fare worse if they also suffer from depression.^3–5 The cause for less favourable outcomes is thought to be multifactorial and to include poor adherence to treatment.⁵ To our knowledge, quality of care in emergency departments has not been examined as a possible contributor. It has been suggested that patients with mental illness receive a lower-priority triage score than other patients in emergency departments because of the stigma of the disease.^6,7Virtually all patients who present to an emergency department are initially assessed by a trained triage nurse. The nurse assigns them a triage score based on their illness acuity, prioritizing them for subsequent emergency care. In Ontario, all emergency departments are mandated to use the five-level Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale.⁸ This uniformity provides an opportunity to study the effect of triage at the population level. In the United States, various triage tools are used.⁹Previously, we established that the emergency department triage scores assigned to patients who are ultimately found to be having an acute myocardial infarction are independently associated with delays in diagnostic testing and reperfusion.¹⁰ In this study, we examined the emergency department care of patients with acute myocardial infarction who had a medical history of depression noted in their emergency department chart. We aimed to determine whether these patients were assigned lower-priority triage scores than other patients with acute myocardial infarction and whether there was an association between a charted history of depression and performance on established quality-of-care indices.¹¹     

Risk of bleeding associated with combined use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and antiplatelet therapy following acute myocardial infarction

Background:

Patients prescribed antiplatelet treatment to prevent recurrent acute myocardial infarction are often also given a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) to treat coexisting depression. Use of either treatment may increase the risk of bleeding. We assessed the risk of bleeding among patients taking both medications following acute myocardial infarction.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using hospital discharge abstracts, physician billing information, medication reimbursement claims and demographic data from provincial health services administrative databases. We included patients 50 years of age or older who were discharged from hospital with antiplatelet therapy following acute myocardial infarction between January 1998 and March 2007. Patients were followed until admission to hospital due to a bleeding episode, admission to hospital due to recurrent acute myocardial infarction, death or the end of the study period.

Results:

The 27 058 patients in the cohort received the following medications at discharge: acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (n = 14 426); clopidogrel (n = 2467), ASA and clopidogrel (n = 9475); ASA and an SSRI (n = 406); ASA, clopidogrel and an SSRI (n = 239); or clopidogrel and an SSRI (n = 45). Compared with ASA use alone, the combined use of an SSRI with antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased risk of bleeding (ASA and SSRI: hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08–1.87; ASA, clopidogrel and SSRI: HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.61–3.42). Compared with dual antiplatelet therapy alone (ASA and clopidogrel), combined use of an SSRI and dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased risk of bleeding (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07–2.32).

Interpretation:

Patients taking an SSRI together with ASA or dual antiplatelet therapy following acute myocardial infarction were at increased risk of bleeding.Antiplatelet agents such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel are a mainstay of therapy following acute myocardial infarction. These agents are effective in reducing the risk of recurrent acute myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular events, with the potential for additive benefit when used in combination.^1–3 The risk of bleeding associated with their use, however, is of concern.^4–6 This risk may be increased further by the frequent concomitant use of other medications associated with an increased risk of bleeding, such as anticoagulant therapy⁷ and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).Up to 20% of patients with cardiovascular disease experience depression and are most often prescribed an SSRI.^8–13 The vast majority of these patients also use antiplatelet therapy. The risk of bleeding associated with combining SSRI therapy with single or dual antiplatelet therapy is uncertain. Two large clinical trials that examined SSRI use following acute myocardial infarction did not specifically report on the risk of bleeding,^14,15 and earlier studies suggested no increase in risk associated with SSRI therapy combined with single-agent antiplatelet therapy.^16,17SSRI use itself has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding, particularly during the first month of use.¹⁸ The inhibition of serotonin transporters by SSRIs is thought to be responsible for the risk of bleeding.¹⁹ Platelets release serotonin at sites of bleeding and vascular damage; however, they do not synthesize serotonin and instead acquire it from the blood and store it.^19,20 By this mechanism, SSRIs may also worsen the bleeding caused by ASA and clopidogrel.^19,20 Inhibition of cytochrome P450 by certain SSRIs has also been associated with increased risk of drug interaction causing bleeding;²¹ however, data on this issue are scarce.We examined the risk of bleeding associated with the use of SSRIs when combined with single and dual antiplatelet therapy among patients following acute myocardial infarction.     

Effect of marriage on duration of chest pain associated with acute myocardial infarction before seeking care

Background:

Coronary artery disease is the most common cause of death in the Western world, and being married decreases the risk of death from cardiovascular causes. We aimed to determine whether marital status was a predictor of the duration of chest pain endured by patients with acute myocardial infarction before they sought care and whether the patient’s sex modified the effect.

Methods:

We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort analysis of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 96 acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada, from April 2004 to March 2005. We excluded patients who did not experience chest pain. Using multivariable regression analyses, we assessed marital status in relation to delayed presentation to hospital (more than six hours from onset of pain), both overall and stratified by sex. In patients who reported the exact duration of chest pain, we assessed the effect of marital status on the delay in seeking care.

Results:

Among 4403 eligible patients with acute myocardial infarction, the mean age was 67.3 (standard deviation 13.6) years, and 1486 (33.7%) were women. Almost half (2037 or 46.3%) presented to a hospital within two hours, and 3240 (73.6%) presented within six hours. Overall, 75.3% (2317/3079) of married patients, 67.9% (188/277) of single patients, 68.5% (189/276) of divorced patients and 70.8% (546/771) of widowed patients presented within six hours of the onset of chest pain. Being married was associated with lower odds of delayed presentation (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.71, p < 0.001) relative to being single. Among men, the OR was 0.35 (95% CI 0.21–0.59, p < 0.001), whereas among women the effect of marital status was not significant (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.49–3.73, p = 0.55).

Interpretation:

Among men experiencing acute myocardial infarction with chest pain, being married was associated with significantly earlier presentation for care, a benefit that was not observed for married women. Earlier presentation for medical care appears to be one reason for the observed lower risk of cardiovascular death among married men, relative to their single counterparts.Marriage has long been known to offer health benefits^1,2 and is associated with a lower risk of death^3,4 relative to people who are not married. The effect is more pronounced among men than among women.^5,6 However, the specific mechanisms responsible for the lower rate of cardiovascular deaths in married persons⁷ are not known.Effective, time-sensitive therapy for acute myocardial infarction is available,^8,9 and delays in the emergency department and for in-hospital components of care have been substantially reduced over the past few decades.^10,11 In contrast, patients’ delay in seeking care for acute myocardial infarction has shown little improvement over time,^12,13 despite intensive campaigns to raise public awareness.^14,15 Patients’ delay remains by far the largest component of the overall delay between onset of symptoms and receipt of therapy.¹⁶ No study has examined the effect of marital status on patients’ delay, and only a few small studies have examined predictors of this component of delay by sex.^17,18We examined the effect of marital status, a social factor, on the time from onset of chest pain to arrival in an emergency department or hospital, in a population-based cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction. We hypothesized that being married or in a common-law relationship would be associated with less delay, because we surmised that a spouse would encourage earlier pursuit of medical care, either directly or indirectly (i.e., even if the spouse was not physically present during the symptoms, his or her existence might spur the patient to seek care earlier). We hypothesized that wives would be more likely than husbands to assume the caregiver role and that the beneficial effect of marriage would therefore be stronger among men than among women.     

Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction

Background

Patients exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging and therapeutic procedures after acute myocardial infarction may be at increased risk of cancer.

Methods

Using an administrative database, we selected a cohort of patients who had an acute myocardial infarction between April 1996 and March 2006 and no history of cancer. We documented all cardiac imaging and therapeutic procedures involving low-dose ionizing radiation. The primary outcome was risk of cancer. Statistical analyses were performed using a time-dependent Cox model adjusted for age, sex and exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from noncardiac imaging to account for work-up of cancer.

Results

Of the 82 861 patients included in the cohort, 77% underwent at least one cardiac imaging or therapeutic procedure involving low-dose ionizing radiation in the first year after acute myocardial infarction. The cumulative exposure to radiation from cardiac procedures was 5.3 milliSieverts (mSv) per patient-year, of which 84% occurred during the first year after acute myocardial infarction. A total of 12 020 incident cancers were diagnosed during the follow-up period. There was a dose-dependent relation between exposure to radiation from cardiac procedures and subsequent risk of cancer. For every 10 mSv of low-dose ionizing radiation, there was a 3% increase in the risk of age- and sex-adjusted cancer over a mean follow-up period of five years (hazard ratio 1.003 per milliSievert, 95% confidence interval 1.002–1.004).

Interpretation

Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging and therapeutic procedures after acute myocardial infarction is associated with an increased risk of cancer.Studies involving atomic bomb survivors have documented an increased incidence of malignant neoplasm related to the radiation exposure.^1–4 Survivors who were farther from the epicentre of the blast had a lower incidence of cancer, whereas those who were closer had a higher incidence.⁵ Similar risk estimates have been reported among workers in nuclear plants.⁶ However, little is known about the relation between exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical procedures and the risk of cancer.In the past six decades since the atomic bomb explosions, most individuals worldwide have had minimal exposure to ionizing radiation. However, the recent increase in the use of medical imaging and therapeutic procedures involving low-dose ionizing radiation has led to a growing concern that individual patients may be at increased risk of cancer.^7–12 Whereas strict regulatory control is placed on occupational exposure at work sites, no such control exists among patients who are exposed to such radiation.^13–16It is not only the frequency of these procedures that is increasing. Newer types of imaging procedures are using higher doses of low-dose ionizing radiation than those used with more traditional procedures.^8,11 Among patients being evaluated for coronary artery disease, for example, coronary computed tomography is increasingly being used. This test may be used in addition to other tests such as nuclear scans, coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention, each of which exposes the patient to low-dose ionizing radiation.^12,17–21 Imaging procedures provide information that can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Since such predictions do not necessarily translate into better clinical outcomes,^8,12 the prognostic value obtained from imaging procedures using low-dose ionizing radiation needs to be balanced against the potential for risk.Authors of several studies have estimated that the risk of cancer is not negligible among patients exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation.^22–27 To our knowledge, none of these studies directly linked cumulative exposure and cancer risk. We examined a cohort of patients who had acute myocardial infarction and measured the association between low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging and therapeutic procedures and the risk of cancer.     

National trends in rates of death and hospital admissions related to acute myocardial infarction,heart failure and stroke, 1994–2004

Background

Rates of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases have been steadily declining over the past few decades. Whether such declines are occurring to a similar degree for common disorders such as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke is uncertain. We examined recent national trends in mortality and rates of hospital admission for these 3 conditions.

Methods

We analyzed mortality data from Statistic Canada’s Canadian Mortality Database and data on hospital admissions from the Canadian Institute for Health Information’s Hospital Morbidity Database for the period 1994–2004. We determined age- and sex-standardized rates of death and hospital admissions per 100 000 population aged 20 years and over as well as in-hospital case-fatality rates.

Results

The overall age- and sex-standardized rate of death from cardiovascular disease in Canada declined 30.0%, from 360.6 per 100 000 in 1994 to 252.5 per 100 000 in 2004. During the same period, the rate fell 38.1% for acute myocardial infarction, 23.5% for heart failure and 28.2% for stroke, with improvements observed across most age and sex groups. The age- and sex-standardized rate of hospital admissions decreased 27.6% for stroke and 27.2% for heart failure. The rate for acute myocardial infarction fell only 9.2%. In contrast, the relative decline in the inhospital case-fatality rate was greatest for acute myocardial infarction (33.1%; p < 0.001). Much smaller relative improvements in case-fatality rates were noted for heart failure (8.1%) and stroke (8.9%).

Interpretation

The rates of death and hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke in Canada changed at different rates over the 10-year study period. Awareness of these trends may guide future efforts for health promotion and health care planning and help to determine priorities for research and treatment.Cardiovascular disease, including stroke, is the leading cause of death globally. Therefore, changes in the incidence and mortality of these disorders have a major impact on the overall health of a country’s population and on the health care system.¹ Rates of death from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease have been steadily declining in Western Europe and North America for the past 3 decades.^2,3 Whether this decline is occurring to a similar degree for common conditions such as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke is uncertain. Although these 3 conditions are associated with several common risk factors, the relative importance of risk factors such as smoking, hypertension and hyperlipidemia differs between them.⁴ Furthermore, the rate of new therapeutic advances for these conditions has varied in both the acute, in-hospital setting and in the outpatient setting, where primary and secondary prevention of events occurs.A comparative evaluation of recent population-based trends in incidence and mortality would provide an assessment of the relative progress achieved in preventing and treating these important conditions. Furthermore, the substantial economic impact of cardiovascular disease, including stroke, on the health care system — estimated at $18 billion per year in direct and indirect costs in Canada in 1998⁵ — underscores the need for continued monitoring of cardiovascular disease and treatment outcomes. A study of temporal trends could also help guide future health promotion activities and health care planning.We conducted a study of recent trends in the rates of death and hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke in Canada from 1994 to 2004. We also studied whether changes in these trends occurred at similar rates in younger and older Canadians and in both sexes.     

Smoking cessation initiated during hospital stay for patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Programs for smoking cessation for cardiac patients are underused in Canada. We examined the efficacy of an intervention for smoking cessation for patients admitted to hospital for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or because of acute myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods

Nurses randomly assigned 276 sequential patients admitted because of acute MI or for CABG who met the inclusion criteria. Participants received an intensive or minimal smoking-cessation intervention. The minimal intervention included advice from physicians and nurses and 2 pamphlets. The intensive intervention included the minimal intervention plus 60 minutes of bedside counselling, take-home materials and 7 nurse-initiated counselling calls for 2 months after discharge. The outcomes were point prevalence of abstinence at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge.

Results

The 12-month self-reported rate of abstinence was 62% among patients in the intensive group and 46% among those in the minimal group (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–3.1). Abstinence was confirmed for 54% of patients in the intensive group and 35% in the minimal group (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3–3.6). Abstinence was significantly lower among those who used pharmacotherapy than among those who did not (p < 0.001). Continuous 12-month abstinence was 57% in the intensive group and 39% in the minimal group (p < 0.01). It was significantly higher among patients admitted for CABG than among those admitted because of acute MI (p < 0.05).

Interpretation

Providing intensive programs for smoking cessation for patients admitted for CABG or because of acute MI could have a major impact on health and health care costs.Interventions for smoking cessation are underused in cardiac units in Canada,¹ even though coronary artery disease accounts for a large proportion of hospital admissions among adults aged 45 or more years.² Compared with the use of other secondary prevention and management measures (e.g., statins, acetylsalicylic acid, β-blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors), the use of smoking-cessation measures among those with coronary artery disease results in greater reductions in mortality risk^1,3,4 and greater cost-effectiveness.⁵ Risk reductions in this group include a 32% decrease in nonfatal reinfarction, 36% decrease in mortality,³ 300% reduced risk for repeat coronary artery bypass graft (CABG),⁶ and a decreased risk for restenosis after percutaneous translumial coronary angioplasty from 55% to 38%.⁷In this study, we used an intensive intervention, which is the gold standard for smoking cessation among inpatients. When tested in the United States, this intervention resulted in the highest rates of 1-year confirmed cessation reported in the literature.⁸ The intervention involves 45–60 minutes of bedside education and counselling during hospital stay followed by 7 nurse-initiated telephone counselling sessions after discharge.⁹ US trials have reported 1-year confirmed cessation rates of 61% for this intensive intervention compared to 32% for a brief intervention when tested as a stand-alone program.¹⁰ When tested as part of a rehabilitation program for multiple cardiac risk factors, the cessation rates were 70% and 53%, respectively.¹¹ Despite the success of this approach among cardiac patients, interventions for smoking cessation in inpatients have not been widely adopted in Canada.In this randomized clinical trial, we investigated the efficacy of a minimal intervention and an intensive intervention for smoking cessation among patients admitted to hospital because of acute myocardial infarction or for CABG.     

Diagnostic and prognostic utility of early measurement with high-sensitivity troponin T assay in patients presenting with chest pain

Background:

High-sensitivity troponin assays are now available for clinical use. We investigated whether early measurement with such an assay is superior to a conventional assay in the evaluation of acute coronary syndromes.

Methods:

Patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain who did not have ST-segment elevation were prospectively recruited from November 2007 to December 2010. Patients underwent serial testing with a conventional cardiac troponin I assay. Samples were also obtained at presentation and two hours later for measurement of troponin T levels using a high-sensitivity assay. The primary outcome was diagnosis of myocardial infarction on admission; secondary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction and heart failure at one year.

Results:

Of the 939 patients enrolled in the study, 205 (21.8%) had myocardial infarction. By two hours after presentation, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile of the general population (14 ng/L) had a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1%–95.0%) and a specificity of 79.7% (95% CI 78.6%–80.5%) for the diagnosis of non–ST-segment myocardial infarction. The sensitivity of the assay at presentation was 100% among patients who presented four to six hours after symptom onset. By one year, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay was found to be superior than the conventional assay in predicting death (hazard ratio [HR] 5.4, 95% CI 2.7–10.7) and heart failure (HR 27.8, 95% CI 6.6–116.4), whereas the conventional assay was superior in predicting nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.4–6.7).

Interpretation:

The high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile was highly sensitive for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by two hours after presentation and had prognostic utility beyond that of the conventional assay. To rule out myocardial infarction, the optimal time to test a second sample using the high-sensitivity troponin T level may be four to six hours after symptom onset, but this finding needs verification in future studies before it can become routine practice.For novel cardiac markers to be clinically useful in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes, they need to show their incremental utility beyond that of existing markers, with therapeutic implications designed to improve patient care. Recent improvement in the performance of troponin assays to comply with current guidelines for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction¹ has resulted in a new generation of assays with enhanced clinical sensitivity that are now available for use in clinical care. Assays with high sensitivity have been shown to detect myocardial injury earlier^2–8 and identify more patients at risk of future adverse outcomes^8–10 than conventional assays.We conducted a study to assess whether early measurement (at presentation and two hours later) with a high-sensitivity troponin T assay could (a) effectively rule out myocardial infarction without the need for later measurement of troponin levels and (b) identify more patients at risk of adverse cardiac events within one year follow-up compared with a conventional troponin assay.     

Sex-related differences in access to care among patients with premature acute coronary syndrome

Background:

Access to care may be implicated in disparities between men and women in death after acute coronary syndrome, especially among younger adults. We aimed to assess sex-related differences in access to care among patients with premature acute coronary syndrome and to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of access to care.

Methods:

We studied 1123 patients (18–55 yr) admitted to hospital for acute coronary syndrome and enrolled in the GENESIS-PRAXY cohort study. Outcome measures were door-to-electrocardiography, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, as well as proportions of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, reperfusion or nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of timely procedures and use of invasive procedures.

Results:

Women were less likely than men to receive care within benchmark times for electrocardiography (≤ 10 min: 29% v. 38%, p = 0.02) or fibrinolysis (≤ 30 min: 32% v. 57%, p = 0.01). Women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) were less likely than men to undergo reperfusion therapy (primary percutaneous coronary intervention or fibrinolysis) (83% v. 91%, p = 0.01), and women with non–ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina were less likely to undergo nonprimary percutaneous coronary intervention (48% v. 66%, p < 0.001). Clinical determinants of poorer access to care included anxiety, increased number of risk factors and absence of chest pain. Gender-related determinants included feminine traits of personality and responsibility for housework.

Interpretation:

Among younger adults with acute coronary syndrome, women and men had different access to care. Moreover, fewer than half of men and women with ST-segment elevation MI received timely primary coronary intervention. Our results also highlight that men and women with no chest pain and those with anxiety, several traditional risk factors and feminine personality traits were at particularly increased risk of poorer access to care.Despite improvements in the management of acute coronary syndrome over the past few decades, differences in mortality between men and women persist, especially among younger adults.¹ The reasons for poorer outcomes among women are thought to be multifactorial and may include higher baseline prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease^2–4 and poorer access to care.^2–6 However, in the cited studies, patients were relatively old, and only one study⁴ considered clinical factors as potential confounders in the relationship. Moreover, determinants of access to care in men and women with premature acute coronary syndrome remain unknown.The effect of gender-related factors on access to care has not been investigated. Unlike sex, which is a biological characteristic, gender has a wider scope, incorporating the effects of social norms and expectations for men and women. Gender-related variables include gender identity, social roles, socioeconomic status and interpersonal relationships. There has been a considerable reduction in the gender gap in North America in the past decades.⁷ As a result, more women are gaining access to education and employment, and sharing of household and workplace responsibilities is becoming more common. Therefore, assessing sex alone cannot adequately account for differences in access to care among young adults with premature acute coronary syndrome. To better understand differences in access to care between men and women, a detailed examination of both sex- and gender-related factors is required.Our primary objective in this study was to assess sex-related differences in access to care among adults with premature acute coronary syndrome. Our secondary objective was to identify clinical and gender-related determinants of access to care among men and women.     

Effect of ambient air pollution on the incidence of appendicitis

Background

The pathogenesis of appendicitis is unclear. We evaluated whether exposure to air pollution was associated with an increased incidence of appendicitis.

Methods

We identified 5191 adults who had been admitted to hospital with appendicitis between Apr. 1, 1999, and Dec. 31, 2006. The air pollutants studied were ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and suspended particulate matter of less than 10 μ and less than 2.5 μ in diameter. We estimated the odds of appendicitis relative to short-term increases in concentrations of selected pollutants, alone and in combination, after controlling for temperature and relative humidity as well as the effects of age, sex and season.

Results

An increase in the interquartile range of the 5-day average of ozone was associated with appendicitis (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–1.25). In summer (July–August), the effects were most pronounced for ozone (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.57), sulfur dioxide (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03–1.63), nitrogen dioxide (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.20–2.58), carbon monoxide (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01–1.80) and particulate matter less than 10 μ in diameter (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05–1.38). We observed a significant effect of the air pollutants in the summer months among men but not among women (e.g., OR for increase in the 5-day average of nitrogen dioxide 2.05, 95% CI 1.21–3.47, among men and 1.48, 95% CI 0.85–2.59, among women). The double-pollutant model of exposure to ozone and nitrogen dioxide in the summer months was associated with attenuation of the effects of ozone (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48) and nitrogen dioxide (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.97–2.24).

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that some cases of appendicitis may be triggered by short-term exposure to air pollution. If these findings are confirmed, measures to improve air quality may help to decrease rates of appendicitis.Appendicitis was introduced into the medical vernacular in 1886.¹ Since then, the prevailing theory of its pathogenesis implicated an obstruction of the appendiceal orifice by a fecalith or lymphoid hyperplasia.² However, this notion does not completely account for variations in incidence observed by age,^3,4 sex,^3,4 ethnic background,^3,4 family history,⁵ temporal–spatial clustering⁶ and seasonality,^3,4 nor does it completely explain the trends in incidence of appendicitis in developed and developing nations.^3,7,8The incidence of appendicitis increased dramatically in industrialized nations in the 19th century and in the early part of the 20th century.¹ Without explanation, it decreased in the middle and latter part of the 20th century.³ The decrease coincided with legislation to improve air quality. For example, after the United States Clean Air Act was passed in 1970,⁹ the incidence of appendicitis decreased by 14.6% from 1970 to 1984.³ Likewise, a 36% drop in incidence was reported in the United Kingdom between 1975 and 1994¹⁰ after legislation was passed in 1956 and 1968 to improve air quality and in the 1970s to control industrial sources of air pollution. Furthermore, appendicitis is less common in developing nations; however, as these countries become more industrialized, the incidence of appendicitis has been increasing.⁷Air pollution is known to be a risk factor for multiple conditions, to exacerbate disease states and to increase all-cause mortality.¹¹ It has a direct effect on pulmonary diseases such as asthma¹¹ and on nonpulmonary diseases including myocardial infarction, stroke and cancer.^11–13 Inflammation induced by exposure to air pollution contributes to some adverse health effects.^14–17 Similar to the effects of air pollution, a proinflammatory response has been associated with appendicitis.^18–20We conducted a case–crossover study involving a population-based cohort of patients admitted to hospital with appendicitis to determine whether short-term increases in concentrations of selected air pollutants were associated with hospital admission because of appendicitis.     

Likelihood of coronary angiography among First Nations patients with acute myocardial infarction

Background:

Morbidity due to cardiovascular disease is high among First Nations people. The extent to which this may be related to the likelihood of coronary angiography is unclear. We examined the likelihood of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction (MI) among First Nations and non–First Nations patients.

Methods:

Our study included adults with incident acute MI between 1997 and 2008 in Alberta. We determined the likelihood of angiography among First Nations and non–First Nations patients, adjusted for important confounders, using the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) database.

Results:

Of the 46 764 people with acute MI, 1043 (2.2%) were First Nations. First Nations patients were less likely to receive angiography within 1 day after acute MI (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.87). Among First Nations and non–First Nations patients who underwent angiography (64.9%), there was no difference in the likelihood of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.83–1.02) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85–1.25). First Nations people had worse survival if they received medical management alone (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.07–1.77) or if they underwent PCI (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06–1.80), whereas survival was similar among First Nations and non–First Nations patients who received CABG.

Interpretation:

First Nations people were less likely to undergo angiography after acute MI and experienced worse long-term survival compared with non–First Nations people. Efforts to improve access to angiography for First Nations people may improve outcomes.Although cardiovascular disease has been decreasing in Canada,¹ First Nations people have a disproportionate burden of the disease. First Nations people in Canada have a 2.5-fold higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease than non–First Nations people,² with hospital admissions for cardiovascular-related events also increasing.³The prevalence of cardiovascular disease in First Nations populations is presumed to be reflective of the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors.^4–7 However, the disproportionate increase in rates of hospital admission suggests that suboptimal management of cardiovascular disease or its risk factors may also influence patient outcomes.^2,3 Racial disparities in the quality of cardiovascular care resulting in adverse outcomes have been documented, although most studies have focused on African-American, Hispanic and Asian populations.^8,9 As a result, it is unclear whether suboptimal delivery of guideline-recommended treatment contributes to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among First Nations people.^10–12We undertook a population-based study involving adults with incident acute myocardial infarction (MI) to examine the receipt of guideline-recommended coronary angiography among First Nations and non–First Nations patients.^10–12 Among patients who underwent angiography, we sought to determine whether there were differences between First Nations and non–First Nations patients in the likelihood of revascularization and long-term survival.     

Smoked cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Chronic neuropathic pain affects 1%–2% of the adult population and is often refractory to standard pharmacologic treatment. Patients with chronic pain have reported using smoked cannabis to relieve pain, improve sleep and improve mood.

Methods

Adults with post-traumatic or postsurgical neuropathic pain were randomly assigned to receive cannabis at four potencies (0%, 2.5%, 6% and 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol) over four 14-day periods in a crossover trial. Participants inhaled a single 25-mg dose through a pipe three times daily for the first five days in each cycle, followed by a nine-day washout period. Daily average pain intensity was measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale. We recorded effects on mood, sleep and quality of life, as well as adverse events.

Results

We recruited 23 participants (mean age 45.4 [standard deviation 12.3] years, 12 women [52%]), of whom 21 completed the trial. The average daily pain intensity, measured on the 11-point numeric rating scale, was lower on the prespecified primary contrast of 9.4% v. 0% tetrahydrocannabinol (5.4 v. 6.1, respectively; difference = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–1.4). Preparations with intermediate potency yielded intermediate but nonsignificant degrees of relief. Participants receiving 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol reported improved ability to fall asleep (easier, p = 0.001; faster, p < 0.001; more drowsy, p = 0.003) and improved quality of sleep (less wakefulness, p = 0.01) relative to 0% tetrahydrocannabinol. We found no differences in mood or quality of life. The most common drug-related adverse events during the period when participants received 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol were headache, dry eyes, burning sensation in areas of neuropathic pain, dizziness, numbness and cough.

Conclusion

A single inhalation of 25 mg of 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol herbal cannabis three times daily for five days reduced the intensity of pain, improved sleep and was well tolerated. Further long-term safety and efficacy studies are indicated. (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register no. ISRCTN68314063)Chronic neuropathic pain has a prevalence of 1%–2%,¹ and treatment options are limited.² Pharmacotherapy includes anticonvulsants, antidepressants, opioids and local anesthetics,^3,4 but responses vary and side effects limit compliance.Cannabis sativa has been used to treat pain since the third millennium BC.⁵ An endogenous pain-processing system has been identified, mediated by endogenous cannabinoid ligands acting on specific cannabinoid receptors.⁶ These findings, coupled with anecdotal evidence of the analgesic effects of smoked cannabis,⁷ support a reconsideration of cannabinoid agents as analgesics.Oral cannabinoids such as tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and nabilone have, alone and in combination, shown efficacy in central^8,9 and peripheral¹⁰ neuropathic pain, rheumatoid arthritis¹¹ and fibromyalgia.¹²The analgesic effects of smoked cannabis remain controversial, although it is used by 10%–15% of patients with chronic noncancer pain¹³ and multiple sclerosis.¹⁴ Clinical trials are needed to evaluate these effects, given that the risks and benefits of inhaled cannabinoids may differ from oral agents. To date, three small clinical trials of the analgesic efficacy of smoked cannabis have been reported.^15–17 All studies were conducted in residential laboratories, and participants smoked multiple doses of the drug at each time point. No study adequately reported data related to adverse events.We conducted a clinical trial using a standardized single-dose delivery system to explore further the safety and efficacy of smoked cannabis in outpatients with chronic neuropathic pain.     

Use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have yielded inconsistent findings about the association between the use of acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of pneumonia. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize this association.

Methods

We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Embase and the Cochrane Library) from inception to Aug. 28, 2009. Two evaluators independently extracted data. Because of heterogeneity, we used random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of effect.

Results

We identified 31 studies: five case–control studies, three cohort studies and 23 randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis of the eight observational studies showed that the overall risk of pneumonia was higher among people using proton pump inhibitors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.46, I² 90.5%) and histamine₂ receptor antagonists (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09–1.36, I² 0.0%). In the randomized controlled trials, use of histamine₂ receptor antagonists was associated with an elevated risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia (relative risk 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48, I² 30.6%).

Interpretation

Use of a proton pump inhibitor or histamine₂ receptor antagonist may be associated with an increased risk of both community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Given these potential adverse effects, clinicians should use caution in prescribing acid-suppressive drugs for patients at risk.Recently, the medical literature has paid considerable attention to unrecognized adverse effects of commonly used medications and their potential public health impact.¹ One group of medications in widespread use is acid-suppressive drugs, which represent the second leading category of medication worldwide, with sales totalling US$26.9 billion in 2005.²Over the past 40 years, the development of potent acid-suppressive drugs, including proton pump inhibitors, has led to considerable improvements in the treatment of acid-related disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract.³ Experts have generally viewed proton pump inhibitors as safe.⁴ However, potential complications such as gastrointestinal neoplasia, malabsorption of nutrients and increased susceptibility to infection have caused concern.⁵Of special interest is the possibility that acid-suppressive drugs could increase susceptibility to respiratory infections because these drugs increase gastric pH, thus allowing bacterial colonization.^6,7 Several previous studies have shown that treatment with acid-suppressive drugs might be associated with an increased risk of respiratory tract infections⁸ and community-acquired pneumonia in adults^6,7 and children.⁹ However, the association between use of acid-suppressive drugs and risk of pneumonia has been inconsistent.^10–13Given the widespread use of proton pump inhibitors and histamine₂ receptor antagonists, clarifying the potential impact of acid-suppressive therapy on the risk of pneumonia is of great importance to public health.¹⁴ Previous meta-analyses have focused on the role of acid-suppressive drugs in preventing stress ulcer,^11,13,15 but none have examined pneumonia as the primary outcome.The aim of this study was to summarize the association between the use of acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of pneumonia in observational studies and randomized controlled trials.     

Mediterranean diets and metabolic syndrome status in the PREDIMED randomized trial

Background:

Little evidence exists on the effect of an energy-unrestricted healthy diet on metabolic syndrome. We evaluated the long-term effect of Mediterranean diets ad libitum on the incidence or reversion of metabolic syndrome.

Methods:

We performed a secondary analysis of the PREDIMED trial — a multicentre, randomized trial done between October 2003 and December 2010 that involved men and women (age 55–80 yr) at high risk for cardiovascular disease. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dietary interventions: a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil, a Mediterranean diet supplemented with nuts or advice on following a low-fat diet (the control group). The interventions did not include increased physical activity or weight loss as a goal. We analyzed available data from 5801 participants. We determined the effect of diet on incidence and reversion of metabolic syndrome using Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results:

Over 4.8 years of follow-up, metabolic syndrome developed in 960 (50.0%) of the 1919 participants who did not have the condition at baseline. The risk of developing metabolic syndrome did not differ between participants assigned to the control diet and those assigned to either of the Mediterranean diets (control v. olive oil HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94–1.30, p = 0.231; control v. nuts HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.92–1.27, p = 0.3). Reversion occurred in 958 (28.2%) of the 3392 participants who had metabolic syndrome at baseline. Compared with the control group, participants on either Mediterranean diet were more likely to undergo reversion (control v. olive oil HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.15–1.58, p < 0.001; control v. nuts HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08–1.51, p < 0.001). Participants in the group receiving olive oil supplementation showed significant decreases in both central obesity and high fasting glucose (p = 0.02); participants in the group supplemented with nuts showed a significant decrease in central obesity.

Interpretation:

A Mediterranean diet supplemented with either extra virgin olive oil or nuts is not associated with the onset of metabolic syndrome, but such diets are more likely to cause reversion of the condition. An energy-unrestricted Mediterranean diet may be useful in reducing the risks of central obesity and hyperglycemia in people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. ISRCTN35739639.Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of 3 or more related cardiometabolic risk factors: central obesity (determined by waist circumference), hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels and hyperglycemia. Having the syndrome increases a person’s risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.^1,2 In addition, the condition is associated with increased morbidity and all-cause mortality.^1,3–5 The worldwide prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adults approaches 25%^6–8 and increases with age,⁷ especially among women,^8,9 making it an important public health issue.Several studies have shown that lifestyle modifications,¹⁰ such as increased physical activity,¹¹ adherence to a healthy diet^12,13 or weight loss,^14–16 are associated with reversion of the metabolic syndrome and its components. However, little information exists as to whether changes in the overall dietary pattern without weight loss might also be effective in preventing and managing the condition.The Mediterranean diet is recognized as one of the healthiest dietary patterns. It has shown benefits in patients with cardiovascular disease^17,18 and in the prevention and treatment of related conditions, such as diabetes,^19–21 hypertension^22,23 and metabolic syndrome.²⁴Several cross-sectional^25–29 and prospective^30–32 epidemiologic studies have suggested an inverse association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and the prevalence or incidence of metabolic syndrome. Evidence from clinical trials has shown that an energy-restricted Mediterranean diet³³ or adopting a Mediterranean diet after weight loss³⁴ has a beneficial effect on metabolic syndrome. However, these studies did not determine whether the effect could be attributed to the weight loss or to the diets themselves.Seminal data from the PREDIMED (PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea) study suggested that adherence to a Mediterranean diet supplemented with nuts reversed metabolic syndrome more so than advice to follow a low-fat diet.³⁵ However, the report was based on data from only 1224 participants followed for 1 year. We have analyzed the data from the final PREDIMED cohort after a median follow-up of 4.8 years to determine the long-term effects of a Mediterranean diet on metabolic syndrome.     

Low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Recent studies have reported a high prevalence of relative adrenal insufficiency in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, the effect of corticosteroid replacement on mortality in this high-risk group remains unclear. We examined the effect of low-dose hydrocortisone in patients with cirrhosis who presented with septic shock.

Methods

We enrolled patients with cirrhosis and septic shock aged 18 years or older in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Relative adrenal insufficiency was defined as a serum cortisol increase of less than 250 nmol/L or 9 μg/dL from baseline after stimulation with 250 μg of intravenous corticotropin. Patients were assigned to receive 50 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone or placebo every six hours until hemodynamic stability was achieved, followed by steroid tapering over eight days. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.

Results

The trial was stopped for futility at interim analysis after 75 patients were enrolled. Relative adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed in 76% of patients. Compared with the placebo group (n = 36), patients in the hydrocortisone group (n = 39) had a significant reduction in vasopressor doses and higher rates of shock reversal (relative risk [RR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98–2.55, p = 0.05). Hydrocortisone use was not associated with a reduction in 28-day mortality (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.92–1.49, p = 0.19) but was associated with an increase in shock relapse (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.04–6.45, p = 0.03) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 3.00, 95% CI 1.08–8.36, p = 0.02).

Interpretation

Relative adrenal insufficiency was very common in patients with cirrhosis presenting with septic shock. Despite initial favourable effects on hemodynamic parameters, hydrocortisone therapy did not reduce mortality and was associated with an increase in adverse effects. (Current Controlled Trials registry no. ISRCTN99675218.)Cirrhosis is a leading cause of death worldwide,¹ often with septic shock as the terminal event.^2–9 Relative adrenal insufficiency shares similar features of distributive hyperdynamic shock with both cirrhosis and sepsis^10,11 and increasingly has been reported to coexist with both conditions.^11,12 The effect of low-dose hydrocortisone therapy on survival of critically ill patients in general with septic shock remains controversial, with conflicting results from randomized controlled trials^13–17 and meta-analyses.^18,19 The effect of hydrocortisone therapy on mortality among patients with cirrhosis, who are known to be a group at high risk for relative adrenal insufficiency, has not been studied and hence was the objective of our study.     

Baseline Q waves as a prognostic modulator in patients with ST-segment elevation: insights from the PLATO trial

Background:

Baseline Q waves may provide additional value compared with time from the onset of symptoms in predicting outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation. We evaluated whether baseline Q waves superseded time from symptom onset as a prognostic marker of one-year mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Our study was derived from data from patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 hours in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes trial

Methods:

Q waves on the baseline electrocardiogram were evaluated by a blinded core laboratory. We assessed the associations between baseline Q waves and time from symptom onset to percutaneous coronary intervention with peak biomarkers, ST-segment resolution on the discharge electrocardiogram, and one-year all-cause and vascular mortality.

Results:

Of 4341 patients with ST-segment elevation, 46% had baseline Q waves. Compared to those without Q waves, those with baseline Q waves were older, more frequently male, had higher heart rates, more advanced Killip class and had a longer time between the onset of symptoms and percutaneous coronary intervention. They also had higher one-year all-cause mortality than patients without baseline Q waves (baseline Q waves: 4.9%; no baseline Q waves: 2.8%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.45, p < 0.001). Complete ST-segment resolution was greatest and all-cause mortality lowest among those with symptom onset three hours or less before percutaneous coronary intervention and no baseline Q waves. After multivariable adjustment, baseline Q waves, but not time from symptom onset, were associated with a significant increase in all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10–2.01, p = 0.046) and vascular mortality (adjusted HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.28, p = 0.02).

Interpretation:

The presence of baseline Q waves provides useful additional prognostic insight into the clinical outcome of patients with ST-segment elevation. Clinical Trials.gov registration no. {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00391872","term_id":"NCT00391872"}}NCT00391872The clinical outcome of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is directly related to the extent of myocardial necrosis.¹ Because the extent of necrosis is strongly influenced by the duration of symptoms, time is a key clinical proxy for the stage of evolution of STEMI.² The length of time from the onset of symptoms is important in strategies for triage and management and for gauging prognosis. Although time from the occurrence of epicardial artery occlusion in a laboratory experimental model can be measured precisely, time from the onset of symptoms is often difficult to accurately estimate because of subjectivity and reliance on recall. Thus, establishing a more reliable method for determining the stage of myocardial infarction (MI) evolution in patients with STEMI would be useful for evaluating the potential for myocardial salvage and guiding clinical management.There is evidence that the assessment of Q waves on the baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) in the region of ST-segment elevation may be a useful predictor of left ventricular dysfunction and outcomes in patients with STEMI given streptokinase within four to six hours of the onset of symptoms.^3,4 Because prior studies of the predictive value of baseline Q waves focused on patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy, we extended this question to a large population of patients with STEMI who were at high risk of adverse clinical outcomes (e.g., death, ardiogenic shock and heart failure) and undergoing mechanical reperfusion with percutaneous coronary intervention in the Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI)⁵ trial within six hours of symptom onset. A key finding of this study was that Q waves were a key prognostic factor of 90-day mortality and the composite measure of death, cardiogenic shock and heart failure; in addition, Q waves were better than time from symptom onset in predicting these 90-day outcomes.⁶ Whether these findings are applicable to a more general STEMI population studied prospectively is unclear.Given the increasing uptake of therapy for STEMI with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and the continuing challenges in achieving timely reperfusion, we sought to validate these findings in a more contemporary cohort. The PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) study not only provided this opportunity in a large population, but it also extended our evaluation to patients with less stringent ST-segment elevation entry criteria (1 mm in two contiguous leads) randomized over a wider entry window (24 h from symptom onset) and followed for a longer period (1 yr).⁷ In the current study, we aimed to prospectively evaluate whether Q waves in the region of qualifying ST-segment elevation on the baseline ECG provided additional value compared with time from symptom onset as a predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the PLATO trial.⁷ We also assessed associations with vascular death, a prespecified component of the primary outcome in the PLATO trial.     

Cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen versus topical salicylic acid application for cutaneous warts in primary care: randomized controlled trial

Background

Cryotherapy is widely used for the treatment of cutaneous warts in primary care. However, evidence favours salicylic acid application. We compared the effectiveness of these treatments as well as a wait-and-see approach.

Methods

Consecutive patients with new cutaneous warts were recruited in 30 primary care practices in the Netherlands between May 1, 2006, and Jan. 26, 2007. We randomly allocated eligible patients to one of three groups: cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen every two weeks, self-application of salicylic acid daily or a wait-and-see approach. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants whose warts were all cured at 13 weeks. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes included treatment adherence, side effects and treatment satisfaction. Research nurses assessed outcomes during home visits at 4, 13 and 26 weeks.

Results

Of the 250 participants (age 4 to 79 years), 240 were included in the analysis at 13 weeks (loss to follow-up 4%). Cure rates were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29%–51%) in the cryotherapy group, 24% (95% CI 16%–35%) in the salicylic acid group and 16% (95% CI 9.5%–25%) in the wait-and-see group. Differences in effectiveness were most pronounced among participants with common warts (n = 116): cure rates were 49% (95% CI 34%–64%) in the cryotherapy group, 15% (95% CI 7%–30%) in the salicylic acid group and 8% (95% CI 3%–21%) in the wait-and-see group. Cure rates among the participants with plantar warts (n = 124) did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

Interpretation

For common warts, cryotherapy was the most effective therapy in primary care. For plantar warts, we found no clinically relevant difference in effectiveness between cryotherapy, topical application of salicylic acid or a wait-and-see approach after 13 weeks. (ClinicalTrial.gov registration no. ISRCTN42730629)Cutaneous warts are common.^1–3 Up to one-third of primary school children have warts, of which two-thirds resolve within two years.^4,5 Because warts frequently result in discomfort,⁶ 2% of the general population and 6% of school-aged children each year present with warts to their family physician.^7,8 The usual treatment is cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen or, less frequently, topical application of salicylic acid.^9–12 Some physicians choose a wait-and-see approach because of the benign natural course of warts and the risk of side effects of treatment.^10,11A recent Cochrane review on treatments of cutaneous warts concluded that available studies were small, poorly designed or limited to dermatology outpatients.^10,11 Evidence on cryotherapy was contradictory,^13–18 whereas the evidence on salicylic acid was more convincing.^19–23 However, studies that compared cryotherapy and salicylic acid directly showed no differences in effectiveness.^24,25 The Cochrane review called for high-quality trials in primary care to compare the effects of cryotherapy, salicylic acid and placebo.We conducted a three-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen, topical application of salicylic acid and a wait-and-see approach for the treatment of common and plantar warts in primary care.     

Oral administration of morphine versus ibuprofen to manage postfracture pain in children: a randomized trial

Background:

Recent warnings from Health Canada regarding codeine for children have led to increased use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and morphine for common injuries such as fractures. Our objective was to determine whether morphine administered orally has superior efficacy to ibuprofen in fracture-related pain.

Methods:

We used a parallel group, randomized, blinded superiority design. Children who presented to the emergency department with an uncomplicated extremity fracture were randomly assigned to receive either morphine (0.5 mg/kg orally) or ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) for 24 hours after discharge. Our primary outcome was the change in pain score using the Faces Pain Scale — Revised (FPS-R). Participants were asked to record pain scores immediately before and 30 minutes after receiving each dose.

Results:

We analyzed data from 66 participants in the morphine group and 68 participants in the ibuprofen group. For both morphine and ibuprofen, we found a reduction in pain scores (mean pre–post difference ± standard deviation for dose 1: morphine 1.5 ± 1.2, ibuprofen 1.3 ± 1.0, between-group difference [δ] 0.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.2 to 0.6]; dose 2: morphine 1.3 ± 1.3, ibuprofen 1.3 ± 0.9, δ 0 [95% CI −0.4 to 0.4]; dose 3: morphine 1.3 ± 1.4, ibuprofen 1.4 ± 1.1, δ −0.1 [95% CI −0.7 to 0.4]; and dose 4: morphine 1.5 ± 1.4, ibuprofen 1.1 ± 1.2, δ 0.4 [95% CI −0.2 to 1.1]). We found no significant differences in the change in pain scores between morphine and ibuprofen between groups at any of the 4 time points (p = 0.6). Participants in the morphine group had significantly more adverse effects than those in the ibuprofen group (56.1% v. 30.9%, p < 0.01).

Interpretation:

We found no significant difference in analgesic efficacy between orally administered morphine and ibuprofen. However, morphine was associated with a significantly greater number of adverse effects. Our results suggest that ibuprofen remains safe and effective for outpatient pain management in children with uncomplicated fractures. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01690780","term_id":"NCT01690780"}}NCT01690780.There is ample evidence that analgesia is underused,¹ underprescribed,² delayed in its administration² and suboptimally dosed ³ in clinical settings. Children are particularly susceptible to suboptimal pain management⁴ and are less likely to receive opioid analgesia.⁵ Untreated pain in childhood has been reported to lead to short-term problems such as slower healing⁶ and to long-term issues such as anxiety, needle phobia,⁷ hyperesthesia⁸ and fear of medical care.⁹ The American Academy of Pediatrics has reaffirmed its advocacy for the appropriate use of analgesia for children with acute pain.¹⁰Fractures constitute between 10% and 25% of all injuries.¹¹ The most severe pain after an injury occurs within the first 48 hours, with more than 80% of children showing compromise in at least 1 functional area.¹² Low rates of analgesia have been reported after discharge from hospital.¹³ A recently improved understanding of the pharmacogenomics of codeine has raised significant concerns about its safety,^14,15 and has led to a Food and Drug Administration boxed warning¹⁶ and a Health Canada advisory¹⁷ against its use. Although ibuprofen has been cited as the most common agent used by caregivers to treat musculoskeletal pain,^12,13 there are concerns that its use as monotherapy may lead to inadequate pain management.^6,18 Evidence suggests that orally administered morphine¹³ and other opioids are increasingly being prescribed.¹⁹ However, evidence for the oral administration of morphine in acute pain management is limited.^20,21 Thus, additional studies are needed to address this gap in knowledge and provide a scientific basis for outpatient analgesic choices in children. Our objective was to assess if orally administered morphine is superior to ibuprofen in relieving pain in children with nonoperative fractures.     

Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Induction of labour is common, and cesarean delivery is regarded as its major complication. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether the risk of cesarean delivery is higher or lower following labour induction compared with expectant management.

Methods:

We searched 6 electronic databases for relevant articles published through April 2012 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which labour induction was compared with placebo or expectant management among women with a viable singleton pregnancy. We assessed risk of bias and obtained data on rates of cesarean delivery. We used regression analysis techniques to explore the effect of patient characteristics, induction methods and study quality on risk of cesarean delivery.

Results:

We identified 157 eligible RCTs (n = 31 085). Overall, the risk of cesarean delivery was 12% lower with labour induction than with expectant management (pooled relative risk [RR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.93; I² = 0%). The effect was significant in term and post-term gestations but not in preterm gestations. Meta-regression analysis showed that initial cervical score, indication for induction and method of induction did not alter the main result. There was a reduced risk of fetal death (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.25–0.99; I² = 0%) and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79–0.94), and no impact on maternal death (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.10–9.57; I² = 0%) with labour induction.

Interpretation:

The risk of cesarean delivery was lower among women whose labour was induced than among those managed expectantly in term and post-term gestations. There were benefits for the fetus and no increased risk of maternal death.Labour is induced in 1 of 5 births^1,2 for maternal reasons (e.g., preeclampsia, cardiac or renal disease), fetal reasons (e.g., intrauterine growth restriction) or a combination (e.g., poorly controlled diabetes, preterm rupture of the membranes or post-term pregnancy).³ Induction of labour artificially ripens the cervix and initiates uterine contractions in women who are not already in labour, leading to progressive dilation of the cervix to achieve vaginal birth of a baby at any gestation beyond the legal definition of fetal viability.⁴Although induction of labour has been criticized for an associated increased risk of cesarean delivery, recent studies have shown that there are fewer cesarean deliveries with induction than without it. However, the findings have not had much impact on practice, in part because the systematic reviews^5–8 investigated subsets of induction and included few randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and because observational data in a cohort study⁹ had risk of confounding. Consumer organizations,¹⁰ guidelines¹¹ and textbooks^12,13 have given contradictory information about cesarean risk, which can lead to confusion over decision-making, particularly given a desire to support normal birth in the face of increasing cesarean rates worldwide. Cesarean delivery carries multiple risks to mother and baby, including maternal death,¹⁴ infection and postnatal depression,^15,16 and respiratory distress syndrome in neonates.¹⁴ Accurate, precise information about cesarean risk is therefore needed for decision-making regarding labour induction.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the risk of cesarean delivery associated with labour induction compared with expectant management. We also explored the effects of clinical characteristics and study quality on the overall result using subgroup and meta-regression analyses.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy for stem cell mobilization following anterior wall myocardial infarction: the CAPITAL STEM MI randomized trial

Background:

Small studies have yielded divergent results for administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) after acute myocardial infarction. Adequately powered studies involving patients with at least moderate left ventricular dysfunction are lacking.

Methods:

Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% after anterior-wall myocardial infarction were treated with G-CSF (10 μg/kg daily for 4 days) or placebo. After initial randomization of 86 patients, 41 in the placebo group and 39 in the G-CSF group completed 6-month follow-up and underwent measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by radionuclide angiography.

Results:

Baseline and 6-week mean ejection fraction was similar for the G-CSF and placebo groups: 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.6%–37.0%) v. 36.4% (95% CI 33.5%–39.2%) at baseline and 39.8% (95% CI 36.2%–43.4%) v. 43.1% (95% CI 39.2%–47.0%) at 6 weeks. However, G-CSF therapy was associated with a lower ejection fraction at 6 months relative to placebo (40.8% [95% CI 37.4%–44.2%] v. 46.0% [95% CI 42.7%–44.3%]). Both groups had improved left ventricular function, but change in left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in patients treated with G-CSF than in those who received placebo (5.7 [95% CI 3.4–8.1] percentage points v. 9.2 [95% CI 6.3–12.1] percentage points). One or more of a composite of several major adverse cardiac events occurred in 8 patients (19%) within each group, with similar rates of target-vessel revascularization.

Interpretation:

In patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction following anterior-wall infarction, G-CSF therapy was associated with a lower 6-month left ventricular ejection fraction but no increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. Future studies of G-CSF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction should be monitored closely for safety. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00394498","term_id":"NCT00394498"}}NCT00394498Rapid reperfusion therapy has become the standard treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction continuing as the strongest predictors of higher long-term risk.¹ To date, no definitive therapies exist to regenerate myocardium following myocardial necrosis, and myocardial preservation is therefore the goal of STEMI care. Contemporary studies have suggested the possibility of myocardial regeneration by endogenous stem and progenitor cell populations, and preliminary clinical studies have hinted at potential benefit.^2,3 Studies investigating whether postinfarction myocardial function can be improved by enhancing stem cell–mediated repair are in progress ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00936819","term_id":"NCT00936819"}}NCT00936819 and {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT00984178","term_id":"NCT00984178"}}NCT00984178).Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), an endogenously produced glycoprotein growth factor, when given in pharmacologic doses, stimulates mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells into the peripheral blood. Therapeutically, recombinant synthetic forms have been used to enhance recovery from neutropenia following chemotherapy and for mobilization of stem cells before hematopoietic stem cell transplant.⁴ Numerous small clinical studies have investigated the potential of G-CSF–induced mobilization of stem cells in the peri-infarction period to enhance left ventricular recovery, but they have yielded discordant results. However, meta-analyses have suggested benefit for left ventricular ejection fraction in subgroups who received G-CSF early after infarction or in patients whose left ventricular dysfunction was mild to moderate.^5,6 Larger trials are necessary because, in addition to mobilizing stem cells, G-CSF modulates intracellular signalling cascades within cardiomyocytes and can activate neutrophils, and several trials have been stopped early as a result of excessive in-stent restenosis and acute coronary syndromes in patients with coronary artery disease.^7–11 Animal data have similarly yielded discordant results, depending on the dose and timing of G-CSF.¹²To clarify the role of G-CSF in promoting left ventricular recovery after acute myocardial infarction, we performed an adequately powered randomized clinical trial in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction following anterior-wall STEMI.