基于机会成本法的海洋保护区生态保护补偿标准

建立海洋保护区已被公认为维持海洋生物多样性和防止海洋生态环境恶化的重要途径,而合理实施生态保护补偿是确保海洋保护区建设和管理成效、促进区域经济发展机会公平的关键手段。以土地、海域为载体,从机会成本补偿的角度出发,分别设置了机会成本补偿基数、区域调整系数、分区补偿系数和开发限度补偿系数,构建了海洋保护区生态保护补偿标准测算方法,并选取全国8个省(市)14个国家级海洋自然保护区开展了实证分析。结果表明:2015年案例区的机会成本补偿测算结果介于0.66×10⁴—10.69×10⁴元/km²之间,河北昌黎黄金海岸国家级自然保护区和天津古海岸与湿地国家级自然保护区的补偿金额显著高于其他保护区,分别为10.69×10⁴元/km²和10.47×10⁴元/km²,相比之下,其余12个保护区的平均补偿金额为1.70×10⁴元/km²。     

海洋生态红线区划--以海南省为例

随我国沿海地区社会经济迅速发展,各种不合理的资源开发活动已使海洋生态系统遭受严重威胁,亟需实施海洋生态红线制度为海洋生态保护与生态建设、优化区域开发与产业布局提供合理空间边界。介绍了生态红线概念的起源和内涵,提出了海洋生态红线的定义和基本原则,并以海南省为例介绍了海洋生态红线区划的技术框架,同时针对海洋生态红线区划面临的若干问题进行探讨,以期为我国海洋生态红线区划研究提供参考。     

海洋保护区管理与保护成效评估的方法与进展

全球物种多样性的持续下降使得生物多样性保护面临巨大挑战, 海洋生物多样性的保护任务尤其艰巨。海洋保护区是保护生物多样性的有效方式之一, 如何对其成效进行评估是当前研究热点。然而, 目前针对海洋保护区的评估体系较少, 而且评估指标多侧重于管理成效。近年来随着全球生物多样性监测网络和数据库的建立, 以及多种新技术(如遥感、声呐系统、卫星追踪、基因组学等)在海洋生物多样性监测中的应用, 使得从生态系统到基因水平的多层次连续监测成为可能。基于此, 建议未来我国海洋保护区成效评估应在充分利用新技术方法的基础上, 加强长期科学监测, 建立并完善生物多样性监测数据库和信息共享机制, 发展跨学科的综合保护成效评估体系, 加强基于生物多样性监测的保护成效评估。     

四川省大熊猫保护区生态监测现状分析

四川的大熊猫保护区从1999年开始陆续开展野外监测工作。作者收集了开展生态监测保护区一些基本情况、近几年监测工作的发展情况和监测所面临的问题,并提出了一些建议。     

秦岭生态保护区鱼类多样性研究

实地鱼类资源考察、检视鱼类标本以及参考鱼类分类、分布文献表明,秦岭生态保护区现有鱼类7目16科79属共141种(亚种)。物种多样性G-F指数的比较分析显示,和秦岭其他区域相比,秦岭生态保护区鱼类的物种多样性最高:区内不同水系之间相比,则汉江水系最高。利用β多样性指数和Jaccard相似性系数对秦岭生态保护区4条水系的鱼类多样性进行分析,结果显示区内鱼类分布南北差异明显;南坡的3条水系中,南洛河水系和嘉陵江水系鱼类生境相似程度较高,鱼类种、属分化、隔离程度较低,而与汉江水系的生境差异显著,鱼类种属分化、隔离程度较高。根据区内自然地理及水系特征,对水系间鱼类β多样性出现的差异进行了分析。     

中国保护区事业发展的展望

近年来,中国保护区事业得到了迅速的发展,本文概略地总结发展过程中的经验和存在的问题,包括历史的回顾、当前的情况和今后的发展,以供有关方面参考。     

携手保护中国的海洋生态

从联合国教科文组织发起”人与生物圈”计划起至今．已经整整40年了。这40年的历程,恰好是人类自然保护意识空前提高的历史时期。人与生物圈计划在推动全球范围内自然保护发展中发挥了重要而独特的作用。特别是20年前联合国环境与发展大会之后。人与生物圈计划将其优先领域集中在生物多样性保护等四个方面．     

海洋自然保护区生态保护补偿机制

在提炼生态保护补偿概念内涵的基础上,综合考虑政策目标、海洋环境自然属性、自然保护区区域特殊性以及我国制度环境,明确了海洋自然保护区生态保护补偿的思路;根据相关法律法规,结合生态系统服务分析,对海洋自然保护区生态保护补偿机制的主体、客体和补偿标准进行了讨论。研究结果表明,海洋自然保护区生态保护补偿应该以持续的生态效益供给为目标,以正外部性内部化为基本原理;海洋自然保护区生态保护补偿的主体是国家,由相关政府部门代表国家履行补偿责任;补偿客体为保护区周边居民和保护区管理机构,对周边居民的补偿标准以其为保护区牺牲的生态效益价值来确定,对管理机构的补偿标准以其使保护区增加的生态效益价值来确定。在构建补偿机制框架后,探讨了保护区运营资金支持和补偿标准公信力等问题,为后续的研究实践提供参考与借鉴。     

山西庞泉沟保护区原麝的一些生态资料

1982—1987年,我们在山西庞泉沟国家级自然保护区,对原麝(Moschug moschiferus)的数量现状及其保护进行了初步调查,现报道如下:工作区与方法本区位于山西省吕梁山脉中段,地处交城和方山两县交界,东经111°22′—111°33′,北纬37°45′—37°55′。全区总面积为10,443.5公顷。主峰关帝山海拔2830m。森林主要以华北落叶松(Larix principis-rupprechtii)为代表的针叶林和针阔混交林,覆盖度74%。林外沙棘(Hippophae rhamnoides)、黄刺玫(Rosa xanthina)、绣线菊(Spiraea alpina)和灰栒子(Cotoneaster acutifolus)等灌丛。调查方法采用:一、…     

生物圈保护区的意义和作用

生物圈保护区的意义和作用王献溥生物圈保护区是国际保护学家们在探讨世界保护区有效管理,以加强自然资源的保护和持续利用密切结合的过程中,于１９７１年正式提出的一个崭新的概念和专门术语,并于１９７６年正式建立第一批生物圈保护区。至今已发展成为一个分布在８０...     

Spatial analysis of Protected Areas of the coastal/marine environment of Brazil

This study analyses the spatial distribution pattern of the Protected Areas (PA) of the Brazilian coastal and marine environments using Ripley's function. The PA are classified in accordance with the three Large Marine Ecosystems (LME) of the Brazilian coast, also incorporating the divisions provided in the National Coastal Management Plan. The similarity among management strategies in the three LME was analysed by the Morisita-Horn index. The assumptions are as follows: (i) the PA will be aggregated in the coastal environment for the three LME and (ii) differences exist with regard to the similarities within and between the LME. The analysed PA showed an aggregate pattern for shorter distances and a uniform pattern for longer distances. These patterns were significant for the East Coast and the South Platform. The management similarity was greater between the East Coast and the South Platform, suggesting that these two LME use similar strategies to manage natural resources. The coastal environment is more protected than the marine environment. Results indicate that the marine environment has a small number of protected environments. Both environments use more frequently the management model of Sustainable-Use Protected Area, with the participation of several social players in the management area. The country is still far from reaching the Targets of Aichi and of the Ministry of the Environment.     

Mitigating human disturbance: can protection influence trajectories of recovery in benthic assemblages?

1. Understanding whether Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) can be considered as a suitable tool for restoring the structure and function of populations and assemblages is urgently needed to achieve an effective policy of mitigation of human impact in coastal management. However, to date, the role played by MPAs in enhancing ecosystems resilience has been more advocated than unambiguously documented. 2. This study was designed to test whether full protection in marine reserves facilitates recovery of benthos impacted by the date mussel Lithophaga lithophaga fishery, one of the most harmful human activities affecting subtidal rocky habitats in the Mediterranean Sea. 3. The effects of this destructive fishery were reproduced at one fully protected location (P) and at two unprotected control locations (Cs) in the SW Mediterranean Sea. At each location, three plots (4 m2) of rocky surface at 4-6 m depth were disturbed experimentally, while another three plots served as reference. In each plot, the species composition and relative cover of the sessile benthic assemblages were sampled photographically on each of five occasions during a period of 20 months. 4. Over and above variation in habitat features among locations, multivariate and univariate analyses revealed significant differences between P-vs.-Cs in patterns of assemblage recovery and showed that, at the fully protected location, recovery was faster than at the unprotected control locations. 5. Our results suggest that MPAs have the potential to change the trajectories of recovery of disturbed assemblages by accelerating the processes of recolonization and call for further investigation to identify the specific mechanisms underlying increased resilience.     

Permeable Boundaries: Outsiders and Access to Fishing Grounds in the Berau Marine Protected Area

The designation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Indonesia has been accelerated over the past two decades in line with international biodiversity conservation commitments and to secure a basis for decentralised fisheries resources management. The Berau MPA of northeast Kalimantan is one of them. This paper shows how the establishment of the park boundaries and zoning affects local fishers' livelihoods. Particular attention is paid to the position of outsider fishers or andon, who have a legal right to access the resource rich fishing grounds. Decentralised district government legitimises outsider fisheries activities because andon fishing permits bring in fees as a contribution to the regional income (PAD or pendapatan asli daerah), while international environmental organisations and local fishers regard the outsider fishers as illegitimately entering the MPA to access resources they regard as their own. Thus, MPA boundaries appear to be highly permeable, with both local fishers and environmental NGOs seeing the presence of andon as illegitimate and illicit, despite being legal.     

《生物多样性公约》海洋生物多样性议题的 谈判焦点、影响及我国对策

海洋和沿海生物多样性保护和可持续利用等问题是《生物多样性公约》谈判的重要领域。本文梳理了历次缔约方大会的谈判进程, 认为主要焦点议题包括: (1)应对人类活动和全球气候变化对海洋和沿海生物多样性的影响; (2)海洋和沿海生物多样性保护和可持续利用的工具; (3)海洋保护区及具有重要生态或生物学意义的海域。这些议题的讨论将影响包括全球海洋保护区建设在内的海洋生物多样性保护进程, 也将影响全球海洋生物多样性保护国际制度的建设, 以及沿海国家的社会经济。我国应加强履约谈判的技术支持, 加快涉海相关问题研究, 积极参与相关国际谈判, 并大力宣传我国经验。     

Customary management as precautionary and adaptive principles for protecting coral reefs in Oceania

Marine conservation programs in Oceania are increasingly turning to precautionary and adaptive management, particularly approaches which emphasize local participation and customary management. Although the application of community-based natural resource management is widespread in the region, the full integration of local knowledge and practices into the design, implementation, and monitoring of community-based conservation programs has been limited. There is also little empirical data to show whether or not community-based conservation projects are meeting their stated objectives. This paper summarizes an integrated method for selecting Marine Protected Area (MPA) sites and presents empirical evidence that illustrates how an MPA that was largely conceived using indigenous ecological knowledge and existing sea tenure governance (i.e., customary management practices), as part of a regional precautionary and adaptive community-based management plan, is showing signs of biological and social success. More generally, the paper shows how hybrid natural and social research approaches in tandem with customary management for designing MPAs can protect coral reefs in Oceania.     

A decision-support tool to facilitate discussion of no-take boundaries for Marine Protected Areas during stakeholder consultation processes

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are proposed to help conserve marine biodiversity and ecological integrity. There is much guidance on the optimal design of MPAs but once potential MPAs are identified there is little guidance on defining the final no-take boundaries. This is especially problematic in temperate zones where ecological boundaries are “fuzzy”, which can be quite complicated during a consultation process involving the government and divergent stakeholder groups. More decision-support tools are needed to help stakeholders and government agencies objectively compare conservation and socio-economic trade-offs among proposed boundary options. To that end, we developed a method to identify which boundary minimizes spatial overlap of highly vulnerable species and a dominant stressor. We used the recently proposed boundary options of a candidate MPA in Atlantic Canada to illustrate our method. We evaluated the vulnerability of 23 key species to bottom trawling, the most prevalent stressor in the area. We then compared the spatial overlap of the most vulnerable species and the 2002–2011 footprint of bottom trawling among boundary options. The best boundary option was identified as that which minimized spatial overlap and total area. This approach identifies boundary options which provide the greatest protection of vulnerable species from their most significant stressor, at limited socio-economic cost. It is an objective decision-support tool to help stakeholders agree on final boundaries for MPAs.