TTF-1和HBME-1在肺癌患者胸水中的表达及意义

目的探讨TTF-1和HBME-1在肺癌患者胸水中的诊断价值。方法应用免疫细胞化学方法（S-P）研究51例原发性肺癌患者和10例继发性肺癌患者胸水中的癌细胞及44例肺良性疾病胸水中反应性间皮细胞的表达。结果TTF-1在原发性肺癌患者胸水中的阳性率为78.4%（40/51）,而在继发性肺癌患者和肺良性疾病患者的胸水中未见阳性表达;HBME-1在肺良性疾病患者胸水中的阳性率95.5%（42/44）明显高于在原发性肺癌患者胸水中25.5%（13/51）和继发性肺癌患者胸水的阳性率20.0%（2/10）;在不同病理类型原发性肺癌患者胸水中,TTF-1的阳性率在腺癌组90.7%（39/43）明显高于鳞癌组12.5%（1/8）;当TTF-1和HBME-1联合应用时为最佳选择,其检测肺癌患者胸水的敏感性和特异性分别高达96.7%和95.5%。结论TTF-1和HBME-1对原发性、继发性肺癌患者胸水中癌细胞的诊断及鉴别诊断具有重要的临床应用价值。     

hs-CRP、VEGF、CEA联合检测在鉴别良、恶性胸腹腔积液中的临床价值

目的:探讨hs-CRP(high-sensitivity CRP,超敏CRP)、VEGF(Vascular endothelial growth factor,血管内皮生长因子)、CEA(癌胚抗原)对胸腹腔积液鉴别诊断的临床价值.方法:应用乳胶增强散射比浊法、EILSA方法及电化学发光免疫分析技术,检测81例患者胸腹腔积液中hs-CRP、VEGF和CEA的浓度.结果:恶性胸腹腔积液组hs-CRP浓度为[(10.03±10.86)mg/l]与良性胸腹腔积液组[(3.24±4.56)mg/l]比较,差异非常显著(P<0.01);恶性胸腹腔积液组VEGF浓度为[(321.41±295.91)pg/ml]与良性胸腹腔积液组[(31.00±92.87)pg/ml]比较,差异非常显著(P<0.01);恶性胸腹腔积液组CEA浓度为[(227.46±738.08)ng/ml]与良性胸腹腔积液组[(1.10±1.12)ng/ml]比较,浓度明显高于良性组(P<0,05);hs-CRP、VEGF和CEA恶性胸腹腔积液中检测的敏感性分别为47%、58%和47%、特异性为57%、96%和98%;在区分良恶性胸腹腔积液时,hs-CRP、VEGF和CEA联合检测优于单项检测.结论:恶性胸腹腔积液组中hs-CRP、VEGF和CEA水平明显高于良性组.hs-CRP、VEGF及CEA联合检测可区分良、恶性胸腹腔积液的性质,其中以VEGF及CEA联合检测为最佳,对于良、恶性胸腹腔积液的鉴别诊断具有较高的临床价值.     

胸水中VEGF、TNF-α 的检测对良恶性胸水的鉴别诊断意义

目的:探讨检测胸水中血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)水平对良恶性胸水的鉴别诊断意义。方法:采用酶联免疫检测法(ELISA)测定34例良性胸腔积液患者和44例恶性胸腔积液患者胸水中VEGF、TNF-α水平。结果:良性胸腔积液组患者胸水中TNF-α水平显著高于恶性胸腔积液组(P<0.05);良性胸腔积液组患者胸水中VEGF水平显著低于恶性胸腔积液组(P<0.05)。结论:胸水中VEGF、TNF-α水平的检测对良、恶性胸水患者具有鉴别诊断意义。     

CD44v6编码蛋白与Thrombodulin／TM在腹水胃癌细胞的鉴别诊断

观察转移相关黏附分子拼接变异体CD44v6在腹水胃癌细胞中的表达率,评价CD44v6是否作为腹水胃癌细胞特异性标志物,探讨胃癌细胞的转移机理.用TM区分腹水中胃癌细胞与间皮细胞.并与Melano-cyte/MC进行了敏感性、特异性对比.从腹水液基薄层细胞涂片中筛查出53例胃癌细胞,28例间皮细胞进行常规细胞石蜡包埋切片,采用鼠抗人CD44v6,TM,MC特异性抗体,对53例胃癌细胞.28例间皮细胞进行了免疫组化检测,应用χ2检验.CD44v6在腹水胃癌细胞中的检出丰为96.2%(51/53),间皮细胞中的检出率为7.14%(2/28);TM,MC在间皮细胞中的检出率分别为96.4%(27/28),92.9%(26/28),胃癌细胞中的检出率为7.55%(4/53)22.6%(12/53);TM,MC对间皮细胞敏感性分别为96.4%(27/28)、92.9%(26/28);TM,MC对间皮细胞特异性为92.5%(49/53)、77.4%(41/53).薄层细胞涂片、石蜡包埋技术能够有效地开展细胞免疫化学检测,并且具有广阔发展前景.CD44v6在胃癌细胞中的检出率明显高于间皮细胞,提示参与了胃癌细胞的浸润转移,可作为胃癌细胞的标志物.TM对间皮细胞检测的敏感性、特异性要高于MC.CD44v6协同TM对于胃癌细胞和间皮细胞的鉴别诊断有重要的意义.     

非小细胞肺癌中肿瘤标志物CEA、SCC、NSE表达水平的临床分析

目的分析和探讨肿瘤标志物CEA、SCC、NSE在非小细胞肺癌临床预诊中的价值。方法对83例非小细胞肺癌患者和50例健康人进行肿瘤标志物CEA、SCC、NSE检测,从非小细胞肺癌不同分期、不同病理类型及综合阳性率等方面进行观察分析。结果非小细胞肺癌组CEA阳性率各期均在50%以上,NSE阳性率随肿瘤分期递增,平均为51.8%,二者的测定值Ⅲb、Ⅳ期均明显高于Ⅱ、Ⅲa期(P<0.01);SCC阳性率25%~33.3%,测定值各期差异不显著(P>0.05)。CEA以腺癌阳性率最高,测定值腺癌组明显高于其他组(P<0.01);SCC鳞癌组的阳性率和测定值均高于其他组(P<0.05);NSE鳞癌和大细胞未分化癌阳性率均在50%以上,测定值鳞癌、大细胞未分化癌和其他类型明显高于腺癌组(P<0.01)。不同病理类型综合阳性率的表达:有一项以上阳性者鳞癌为71.1%,腺癌为81.3%,大细胞未分化癌为80%,其他类型为100%。结论CEA、SCC、NSE三者联合检测综合阳性率明显提高。NSE敏感性高,特异性差,可作为肺癌早期诊断的辅助手段。     

血清和胸水中CA125在结核性和癌性胸水中的表达及临床意义

目的:探讨血清和胸水中CA125在结核性和癌性胸水中的表达及鉴别诊断意义。方法:抽选我院确诊的结核性胸水病人85例(结核组)和癌性胸水病人71例(癌症组),检测两组患者血清和胸水中CA125表达,并以胸水/血清中CA125比值10(p-CA125/s-CA12510)为临界值,观察其对癌性胸水的鉴别特异度、灵敏度及准确性。结果:癌症组胸水中CA125表达及p-CA125/s-CA125比值均显著高于结核组(P0.05);但血清中两组CA125表达比较差异无显著性(P0.05);两组胸水中,以35U/ml为临界值,两组患者阳性率92.9%(79/85)、100%(71/71)比较差异无显著性(X2=7.0718,P=0.0078)。癌症组中p-CA125/sCA125比值10的比率(84.5%VS 17.6%)明显高于结核组(X2=66.6244,P=0.0000);并以其为诊断癌性胸水的临界值,鉴别诊断特异度、灵敏度及准确性分别为82.3%、84.5%、83.3%。结论:血清和胸水中CA125表达对于鉴别结核性或者是癌性胸水的临床意义不大,但是p-CA125/s-CA125比值对于鉴别结核性和癌性胸水具有一定临床价值。     

肺癌患者血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的检测及临床意义

目的探讨外周血癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的检测对肺癌的诊断、病理分型和疗效判断的临床用价值。方法采用化学发光法检测了62例肺癌患者、54例良性肺部疾病患者、36例健康人、40例肺癌患者手术前后血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的水平。结果肺癌患者手术前血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的含量明显高于良性肺部疾病组及正常对照组(P0.01)。鳞癌组、腺癌组和小细胞癌组之间肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE水平差异有统计学意义。CEA阳性率以腺癌组最高(84%),CYFRA21-1阳性率以鳞癌组最高(85.2%),NSE阳性率以小细胞癌组最高(80.0%)。手术治疗后未复发转移组CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE水平低于术前,而复发转移组与术前比变化不显著(P0.05)。结论血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的检测对不同病理类型肺癌患者的诊断、病情检测及疗效判断有较好的临床参考价值。     

血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌辅助诊断中的应用

目的探讨血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中的临床价值。方法收集40例健康人、45例肺部良性疾病患者和90例肺癌患者,采用电化学发光分析检测患者血清中肿瘤标志物细胞角蛋白19(CYFRA21-1)、鳞状细胞癌相关抗原(SCC)和癌胚抗原(CEA),以及胃泌素释放肽前体(pro-GRP)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的含量。结果健康人组和肺部良性疾病患者组血清NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA水平较肺癌患者组水平低,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。NSE和pro-GRP在小细胞肺癌患者中的水平均明显高于其他类型的肺癌患者(P0.01),CYFRA21-1和SCC在鳞癌患者中的含量比其他类型肺癌患者高(P0.01)。联合检测此5种血清肿瘤标志物敏感性高于单独的肿瘤标志物(P0.01)。结论联合检测NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA可以提高肺癌诊断的灵敏度。     

CEA和CYFRA21-1在原发性肺癌诊断中的应用价值分析

目的:评价血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)和细胞角蛋白19的片段(CYFRA21-1)水平对原发性肺癌的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2012年5月~2013年5月我科收治的329例肺癌患者和192例肺部良性病变患者的临床资料。结果:肺癌患者血清CEA或CYFRA21-1水平随着肺癌的分期呈现逐渐上升的趋势(P0.001,P0.01)。以血清CEA≥3.4μg/L作为诊断条件诊断肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为67%、62%和75.2%;以血清CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L作为诊断条件诊断原发性肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为48%、87%和86.3%;以血清CEA≥3.4 ug/L和CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L共同作为诊断条件推断原发性肺癌的灵敏度、特异度和阳性预计值预计值分别为48%、87%和86.3%;良性肺部疾病患者中血清CEA和CYFRA-21水平同时升高者只有2%。结论:血清CEA≥3.4 ug/L和CYFRA-21≥5.0 ug/L同时升高对肺癌有具有重要的诊断价值,可有效的鉴别原发性肺癌与其它良性病变。     

血清细胞角蛋白19、神经元特异性烯醇化酶及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用研究

摘要 目的：分析血清细胞角蛋白19（CK19）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原（SCCA）在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用。方法：选择我院自2020年1月至2022年7月收治的85例小细胞肺癌患者作为观察组,另选同期的85例肺部良性疾病患者作为对照组。检测两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平,比较两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平及其阳性率,使用ROC曲线下面积（AUC）分析上述指标对小细胞肺癌的诊断效能,观察小细胞肺癌不同分期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的差异性,分析观察组治疗前后血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的变化情况。结果：观察组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;观察组血清CK19、NSE和SCCA的阳性率均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;经ROC曲线分析,血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的敏感度为91.23 %,特异度为84.67 %,AUC为0.910;在85例小细胞肺癌患者中,临床分期为局限期33例、广泛期52例;广泛期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均高于局限期患者（P＜0.05）。结论：血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的效能较好,三者均与患者病情严重程度有关,有利于此病的早期诊断和病情评估,值得进一步研究应用。     

Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions

Objective:  The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragments (CK19) and HBME-1 in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer.
Study design:  CEA, CK19 and HBME-1 were detected by immunocytochemistry in pleural effusions from patients with lung cancer (86 cases) and without lung cancer (40 cases).
Results:  CEA and CK19 expression were significantly higher in the carcinoma cell group and in three subgrouped as adenocarcinoma (AC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and small cell lung cancer than in the mesothelial cell group, whereas HBME-1 expression was lower in the former group ( P <  0.01). In the subgrouped tumours, CEA expression was higher in AC than in SCC ( P <  0.05), whereas HBME-1 expression was higher in SCC than in AC ( P <  0.01). Used alone, CK19 had the highest sensitivity (95.3%) and accuracy (93.7%), whereas CEA had the highest specificity (97.5%). When combinations of antibodies were evaluated together and membrane staining with HBME-1 taken as a negative outcome, CK19 and HBME-1 gave a high diagnostic performance: sensitivity of 100.0% and accuracy of 95.2% respectively.
Conclusion:  A panel of CEA, CK19 and HBME-1 monoclonal antibodies proved to be suitable for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions.     

Diagnostic interest of the monoclonal antibody CA1 in malignant pleural effusion

The Ca1 antibody was used in an immunohistochemical procedure on smears of cells from 40 patients with malignant pleural effusion. The control group consisted of 25 benign pleural effusions with a high percentage of reactive mesothelial cells. The Ca1 Mc Ab was positive in 19 (79%) of the 24 pleural effusions with positive malignant cytology. In all the benign cases the Ca1 Mc Ab was negative (100% specificity). The Ca1 Mc Ab detected malignant mesothelial cells in two cases and was negative with reactive mesothelial cells and other nucleated cells present in the pleural effusion. We conclude that the Ca1 antibody offers a useful diagnostic method for malignant pleural effusions, when the morphological interpretation is doubtful.     

Lectin microarrays differentiate carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of lectin microarrays in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer. A lectin microarray, LTL, PSA, LCA, UEA-1, AAL, MAL-I, MAL-II, SNA, WGA, ECL, DSA, STL, SWGA, HPA, ConA, GNA, HHL, BPL, EEL, Jacalin, WFA, ACL, MPL, DBA, SBA, was used to determine the glycoprotein profile of cells in pleural effusions from patients with lung cancer (54 cases), and with benign lung disease (54 cases). The A549 cell line, used as an experimental control, was positive for AAL, MAL-I, WGA, STL, Jacalin and ACL binding. Adenocarcinoma cells in pleural effusions were positive for ECL, DSA, AAL, MAL-I, WGA, STL, Jacalin, and ACL binding. AAL, WGA, and ACL positive binding was the most common, found in 54, 48, and 38 samples, respectively. ECL and DSA binding was positive in only 4 samples. In comparison, reactive mesothelial cells displayed positive binding for all markers in the microarray panel. SNA and AAL positive binding was detected in the majority of samples; 50/54 and 48/54 samples, respectively. Positive binding of DBA, MAL-II and EEL was present in only 2, 4 and 4 samples, respectively. SNA binding had the highest sensitivity (92.6 %), specificity (100 %), and accuracy (96.3 %). SNA may be used as a biomarker to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma cells. The lectin microarrays proved able to distinguish carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions.     

Serum Cytokeratin 19 Fragment,CK19-2G2, as a Newly Identified Biomarker for Lung Cancer

Background

CK19-2G2, a new fragment of cytokeratin 19, is a potential tumor marker for diagnosing lung cancer. The preoperative level of serum CK19-2G2 has been demonstrated to be associated with tumor metastasis and survival of breast cancer patients. This study investigated the postoperative dynamic changes in serum CK19-2G2 levels and its clinical significance in lung cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Preoperative serum CK19-2G2 levels were measured in 630 lung cancer patients and were compared with individuals with benign pulmonary diseases (n = 134) and healthy volunteers (n = 263). In 352 cases, the patients underwent surgery. In these patients, in addition to preoperative assays, serum CK19-2G2 was also monitored at 1 week and 1 month after the operation.

Results

The preoperative baseline levels of serum CK19-2G2 was significantly higher in lung cancer patients than patients with benign diseases and healthy controls (P<0.001). The postoperative levels of CK19-2G2 declined significantly within 1 week after tumor resection. Hereafter, a further decrease was observed in the patients who underwent palliative operations, while for the patients in the radical resection group, their CK19-2G2 levels stabilized.

Conclusion

CK19-2G2 may be a candidate marker for diagnosing and monitoring a patient''s response to lung cancer treatment. In addition, CK19-2G2 may be an indicator for micrometastases in lung cancer patients.     

MMP-2 VEGF在肺腺癌细胞中的表达及其意义

目的研究探讨基质金属蛋白酶2(MMP-2)及血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)在胸腔积液、痰液中肺腺癌细胞的不同表达及二者在肺癌细胞侵袭转移过程中的相互关系。方法选择胸腔积液、痰液共计264例癌性及异型增生细胞标本经免疫细胞化学方法分别检测MMP-2 VEGF的表达情况。结果免疫细胞化学结果显示:MMP-2在胸腔积液中腺癌细胞、异型增生上皮细胞的表达率分别为71.7%(99/138)、16.7%(6/36),在胸膜炎和结核病变典型良性胸腔积液增生上皮细胞中不表达;在痰腺癌细胞中的表达率为39.1%(27/69),统计结果显示MMP-2在恶性胸腔积液腺癌细胞中的表达率明显高于在异型增生的上皮、增生的上皮及痰腺癌细胞的表达率(P均0.05)。VEGF在胸腔积液中腺癌细胞、异型增生上皮细胞的表达率分别为89.1%(123/138)、33.3%(12/36),在胸膜炎和结核病变典型良性胸腔积液增生上皮细胞中不表达;在痰腺癌细胞中的表达率为47.8%(33/69),VEGF在恶性胸腔积液腺癌细胞中表达率明显高于在异型增生的上皮细胞、增生的上皮细胞及痰腺癌细胞的表达率(P均0.05),且MMP-2同VEGF总阳性表达率之间成正相关(r=0.867,P=0.049)。结果 MMP-2 VEGF在胸水腺癌细胞中高表达,可能与肺腺癌的转移、侵袭有关;两者联合做免疫细胞化学检查对肺腺癌细胞病理诊断有辅助意义。     

免疫细胞化学方法对胸腔积液中恶性肿瘤细胞的分类与诊断

目的应用免疫细胞化学对胸腔积液中的肺非小细胞癌分类与恶性间皮瘤的鉴别诊断。方法利用液基薄层细胞学自动涂片技术方法对筛查出的胸腔积液可疑瘤细胞及瘤细胞标本1158例进行细胞包埋连续切片,分别作肺非小细胞癌（NSCLC）肿瘤细胞标记物CK7、CK5＆6、TTF-1、E—Ca及恶性间皮瘤标记物MC（MesothelialCell,MC）、CR（Calfetinin,CR）、P53、Vimentin免疫细胞化学染色。结果1158例胸腔积液患者确诊为肺腺癌581例,鳞癌509例,腺鳞癌48例,恶性间皮瘤20例。TTF-1在腺癌中有明显高表达,阳性表达率为92．43％;CK58L6在鳞癌中有明显高表达,阳性表达率为97．45％;MC、CR在恶性间皮瘤中有明显高表达,阳性表达率为100．00％和95．00％。结论液基细胞学与免疫细胞化学技术相结合在胸腔积液鉴别诊断中有很重要的临床意义,CK7、CK58L6、TTF-1、E—ca联合应用可用于胸腔积液中NSCLC之间的分类与诊断,CK58L6、MC、CR、P53、Vimentin联合应用可用于胸腔积液中间皮瘤的定性诊断,值得在临床细胞病理学诊断中推广应用。     

The value of calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 as markers for mesothelioma in cell block preparations of serous effusions

Objective: To determine the value of calretinin and cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 in discriminating mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusion specimens. Methods: A total of 101 recent, histologically or clinically confirmed malignant effusions with immunostained cell block preparations were reviewed. The cases consisted of 34 mesotheliomas and 67 adenocarcinomas. This included 17 ascitic fluid and 84 pleural fluid samples. The adenocarcinomas included metastatic carcinomas from the breast (12), lung (19), stomach (3), colon (1), pancreas (2), ovary (6) endometrium (1) and 23 histologically confirmed metastases from unknown primary sites. The cases were assessed as negative or positive (>5% of cells stained). The staining pattern was recorded as cytoplasmic, cell membrane, nuclear or cytoplasmic and nuclear staining. Results: Calretinin staining was present in 97% (33/34) of the mesothelioma cases with a majority of them showing both cytoplasmic and nuclear staining (29/33). Only 3% (2/67) of adenocarcinomas were positive for calretinin, one being a lung adenocarcinoma and the other an adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site in an ascitic fluid. Cytokeratin 5/6 staining was also present in 33/34 (97%) of mesothelioma cases. Six (9%) adenocarcinomas were positive, including metastases from the lung (1), breast (1), ovary (2) and unknown primary site (2). Four of the six adenocarcinoma cases positive for CK5/6 were in ascitic fluids. No cases of mesothelioma were negative for both calretinin and CK5/6. Only one adenocarcinoma case, (which was from unknown primary site in an ascitic fluid sample), was positive for both markers. Conclusions: The results confirm that calretinin and CK 5/6 are useful markers for mesothelioma in effusion specimens. CK5/6 staining may be less useful for peritoneal fluid specimens where metastatic adenocarcinomas may be more likely to express the antigen. Further study of ascitic/peritoneal specimens is warranted. However, positive staining, particularly for both antigens, is highly indicative of a mesothelial origin for cells. The two markers make a useful addition to EMA and the panel of adenocarcinoma markers routinely applied to effusion specimens.     

肺癌性胸腔积液中生存素基因检测的诊断意义探讨

目的：生存素基因（survivin）是一种新近发现的抗凋亡基因,在肿瘤组织中呈现表达。本文旨在探讨和比较肺癌性胸腔积液和结核性胸腔积液中生存素基因的表达情况,以及其联合细胞学检查对判断肺癌性胸腔积液的敏感度。方法：应用逆转录酶-聚合酶链反应法（RT-PCR）检测2007年06月～2008年03月42例肺癌患者癌性胸腔积液标本,及同时期28例结核性胸腔积液标本的生存素mRNA表达情况,并联合细胞学检查结果进行对比分析。结果：42例肺癌患者胸腔积液标本中生存素mRNA的阳性率为52138％（22／42）;癌细胞的检出率为30．95％（13／42）;生存素mRNA检测联合细胞学检查诊断肺癌的敏感性为61．90％（26／42）,显著高于单独胸腔积液细胞学检测的敏感性（P〈0．001）。28例结核性胸腔积液标本的生存素mRNA阳性率为7．14％（2／28）,显著低于肺癌患者胸腔积液标本生存素mRNA的阳性率（P〈0．001）。结论：运用RT—PCR方法检测胸腔积液中生存素mRNA的表达在判断肺癌性胸腔积液中具有一定的敏感性和特异性,可能作为肺癌辅助诊断的一个新检测指标。     

Tumour associated antigens CA 15.3 and CA 125 in ovarian cancer

CA 125 and CA 15.3 antigens were determined by enzyme immunoassay in 78 patients with ovarian cancer for a total of 540 determinations. The antigens were also investigated in sera from 100 women with other gynaecological diseases, 82 lung cancer patients and in 39 pleural fluids of varying origin. CA 15.3 reference values were evaluated in 91 healthy women (cut-off: 25 U/ml). CA 15.3 sensitivity at diagnosis (60%) and for detecting relapse (44%) was lower than that of CA 125 (90% and 64.7%, respectively). However, CA 15.3 does not increase with aspecific mesothelial cell reaction and thus it is more specific than CA 125. Combined use of the markers during follow-up improves early detection of relapse (at least one of the two was positive in 79% of cases). Therefore both CA 15.3 and CA 125 should be routinely determined for the detection and monitoring of ovarian cancer.