Retrotransposon mdg3 is transferred between somatic cells of unrelated species in coculture

Since retrovirus-like particles of gypsy (mdg4) are capable of interspecific transfer, other Drosophila melanogaster gypsy-related retrotransposons were tested for this property. As a donor and a recipient, D. melanogaster and D. virilis cultured cells were used. Recipient cell DNA was analyzed with probes directed to mdg1, mdg3, 17.6, 297, 412, or B104/roo. Transfer was demonstrated for mdg3, which lacks env. The possible mechanism of transfer is discussed.     

Translational recoding signals between gag and pol in diverse LTR retrotransposons

Because of their compact genomes, retroelements (including retrotransposons and retroviruses) employ a variety of translational recoding mechanisms to express Gag and Pol. To assess the diversity of recoding strategies, we surveyed gag/pol gene organization among retroelements from diverse host species, including elements exhaustively recovered from the genome sequences of Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Candida albicans, and Arabidopsis thaliana. In contrast to the retroviruses, which typically encode pol in the -1 frame relative to gag, nearly half of the retroelements surveyed encode a single gag-pol open reading frame. This was particularly true for the Ty1/copia group retroelements. Most animal Ty3/gypsy retroelements, on the other hand, encode gag and pol in separate reading frames, and likely express Pol through +1 or -1 frameshifting. Conserved sequences conforming to slippery sites that specify viral ribosomal frameshifting were identified among retroelements with pol in the -1 frame. None of the plant retroelements encoded pol in the -1 frame relative to gag; however, two closely related plant Ty3/gypsy elements encode pol in the +1 frame. Interestingly, a group of plant Ty1/copia retroelements encode pol either in a +1 frame relative to gag or in two nonoverlapping reading frames. These retroelements have a conserved stem-loop at the end of gag, and likely express pol either by a novel means of internal ribosomal entry or by a bypass mechanism.     

Evidence for horizontal transfer of the LTR retrotransposon mdg3, which lacks an env gene

Horizontal (interspecific) transfer is regarded as a possible strategy for the propagation of transposable elements through evolutionary time. To date, however, conclusive evidence that transposable elements are capable of horizontal transfer from one species to another has been limited to class II or DNA-type elements. We tested the possibility of such transfer for several Drosophila melanogaster LTR retrotransposons of the gypsy group in an experiment in which D. melanogaster and D. virilis somatic cell lines were used as donor and recipient cells, respectively. This approach was chosen in light of the high levels of LTR retrotransposon amplification and expression observed in cultured D. melanogaster cells. In the course of the experiment, parallel analysis for mdg1, mdg3, 17.6, 297, 412 and B104/roo retrotransposons was performed to detect their presence in the genome of recipient cells. Only the mdg3 retrotransposon, which lacks an env gene, was found to be transmitted into recipient cells. This model, based on the use of cultured cells, is a promising system for further investigating the mechanisms of LTR retrotransposon transfer.     

Complete nucleotide sequence and genome organization of a Drosophila transposable genetic element, 297

The complete nucleotide sequence of 297, a Drosophila copia-like transposable element, was determined and compared with those of other similar Drosophila elements and mammalian retrovirus proviruses. It was found that 297 contains three long open reading frames, comparable in sizes and locations with gag, pol, and env genes in the proviruses of replication-competent retroviruses in vertebrates. The first and second open reading frames of 297 exhibit sequence homologies to gag and pol, respectively, of Moloney murine leukaemia virus. In particular, as with 17.6, another Drosophila copia-like element, the second open reading frame of 297 was shown to be very similar in its entire organization to the retroviral pol gene and to consist of three enzymatic domains. By contrast, no appreciable homology was found between the third open reading frame of 297 and the retroviral env gene. It is also suggested that 297 and 17.6 are a peculiar pair of copia-like elements recently diverged from a common progenitor.     

Transpositions of mobile elements mdg4 (gypsy) and hobo in somatic and germ cells of a genetically unstable mutator strain of Drosophila melanogaster]

Analysis of distribution of the several families of mobile genetic elements has been performed. The analysis dealt with the X chromosomes of male progeny from the crosses of individual males of Mutator strain (MS) with attached-X females. The experimental results demonstrated different localization of the elements gypsy and hobo in the salivary gland squashes of different males-brothers. Location of other elements under study--mdg1, 412, mdg3, copia, 297, 17.6, Beagle, BS, Doc, FB, Springer--was invariant in all larvae. The analysis is equal to the study of transposition events at the level of gametes. Thus, doubtless, the capability of gypsy and hobo to transpose in germ cells of the MS individuals has been detected. Mobilization of the elements occurs at premiotic stages of gametes' development, as indicated by appearance of the clusters of transpositions. In the process of studies on coincidence of gypsy and hobo transposition acts, independent character of the elements' movement has been revealed. It has been detected in the same experiment that the distribution of the gypsy copies in different cells of the same salivary gland varies strongly. All hybridization sites were divided into two groups: "constant" sites common for all cells and "additional" ones, whose locations did not coincide in neighbouring cells of salivary gland. The existence of additional sites is major evidence of gypsy transpositions in somatic cells of MS. Transposition events have been as well discovered for hobo in somatic cells.     

Molecular structure of a gypsy element of Drosophila subobscura (gypsyDs) constituting a degenerate form of insect retroviruses.

We have determined the nucleotide sequence of a 7.5 kb full-size gypsy element from Drosophila subobscura strain H-271. Comparative analyses were carried out on the sequence and molecular structure of gypsy elements of D.subobscura (gypsyDs), D.melanogaster (gypsyDm) and D.virilis (gypsyDv). The three elements show a structure that maintains a common mechanism of expression. ORF1 and ORF2 show typical motifs of gag and pol genes respectively in the three gypsy elements and could encode functional proteins necessary for intracellular expansion. In the three ORF1 proteins an arginine-rich region was found which could constitute a RNA binding motif. The main differences among the gypsy elements are found in ORF3 (env-like gene); gypsyDm encodes functional env proteins, whereas gypsyDs and gypsyDv ORF3s lack some motifs essential for functionality of this protein. On the basis of these results, while gypsyDm is the first insect retrovirus described, gypsyDs and gypsyDv could constitute degenerate forms of these retroviruses. In this context, we have found some evidence that gypsyDm could have recently infected some D.subobscura strains. Comparative analyses of divergence and phylogenetic relationships of gypsy elements indicate that the gypsy elements belonging to species of different subgenera (gypsyDs and gypsyDv) are closer than gypsy elements of species belonging to the same subgenus (gypsyDs and gypsyDm). These data are congruent with horizontal transfer of gypsy elements among different Drosophila spp.     

Intercellular viral spread and intracellular transposition of Drosophila gypsy

It has become increasingly clear that retrotransposons (RTEs) are more widely expressed in somatic tissues than previously appreciated. RTE expression has been implicated in a myriad of biological processes ranging from normal development and aging, to age related diseases such as cancer and neurodegeneration. Long Terminal Repeat (LTR)-RTEs are evolutionary ancestors to, and share many features with, exogenous retroviruses. In fact, many organisms contain endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) derived from exogenous retroviruses that integrated into the germ line. These ERVs are inherited in Mendelian fashion like RTEs, and some retain the ability to transmit between cells like viruses, while others develop the ability to act as RTEs. The process of evolutionary transition between LTR-RTE and retroviruses is thought to involve multiple steps by which the element loses or gains the ability to transmit copies between cells versus the ability to replicate intracellularly. But, typically, these two modes of transmission are incompatible because they require assembly in different sub-cellular compartments. Like murine IAP/IAP-E elements, the gypsy family of retroelements in arthropods appear to sit along this evolutionary transition. Indeed, there is some evidence that gypsy may exhibit retroviral properties. Given that gypsy elements have been found to actively mobilize in neurons and glial cells during normal aging and in models of neurodegeneration, this raises the question of whether gypsy replication in somatic cells occurs via intracellular retrotransposition, intercellular viral spread, or some combination of the two. These modes of replication in somatic tissues would have quite different biological implications. Here, we demonstrate that Drosophila gypsy is capable of both cell-associated and cell-free viral transmission between cultured S2 cells of somatic origin. Further, we demonstrate that the ability of gypsy to move between cells is dependent upon a functional copy of its viral envelope protein. This argues that the gypsy element has transitioned from an RTE into a functional endogenous retrovirus with the acquisition of its envelope gene. On the other hand, we also find that intracellular retrotransposition of the same genomic copy of gypsy can occur in the absence of the Env protein. Thus, gypsy exhibits both intracellular retrotransposition and intercellular viral transmission as modes of replicating its genome.     

Evolution from retrotransposons to retroviruses: origin of the env gene

In genome of Drosophila melanogaster, various families of retrotransposons with different combination of functional domens and mechanisms of transposition are present. However only retrotransposons of gypsy family are retroviruses related to errantiviruses. Other families seemingly appeared as intermediate forms of retroviruses evolution. Despite the fact that the question on origin of retroviruses remains unclear, now the hypothesis of their origin from retrotransoposons can be considered the most consistent. Infectious properties of errantiviruses are linked to the presence of the third open reading frame (the env gene). Acquisition of the env gene conversed retrotransposons into retroviruses. So, origin of this gene is of special interest. Homologues of the env gene of errantiviruses are discovered in genomes of D. melanogaster, as well as in baculoviruses and in bacteria Wolbachia pipientis, the endosymbiont of Drosophila. It was shown that homologue of the env gene come to Wolbachia genome from Drosophila genome by horizontal transfer of the gypsy group retrotransposon. Thus, Wolbachia was not a donor of the env gene for errantiviruses. Seemingly, errantiviruses captured the baculoviral homologue of the env gene (f). However origin of the f gene is not clear. At the same time the env gene homologue in D. melanogaster genome exist (Iris). It must not be ruled out that the Iris gene was the source of the env gene of errantiviruses and baculoviruses.