Ligand binding is without effect on complex formation of the ligand binding domain of the ecdysone receptor (EcR)

The ligand-binding domain (LBD) encompassing the C-terminal parts of the D- and the complete E-domains of the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) fused to Gal4(AD) is present in two high molecular weight complexes (600 and 150 kDa) in yeast extracts according to size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 HR 10/30). Hormone binding is mainly associated with 150-kDa complexes. Complex formation is not influenced by hormone, but the ligand stabilizes the complexes at elevated salt concentrations. Mutational analysis of Gal4(AD)-EcR(LBD) revealed that formation of 600-kDa, but not 150-kDa, complexes depends on dimerization mediated by the EcR(LBD). Deletion of helix 12 is without effect. Mutation of K497 in helix 4, known to be essential for comodulator binding, abolishes 600-KDa complexes, but does not interfere with the formation of 150-kDa complexes. In contrast, the DE-domains of USP fused to Gal4(DBD) elute as monomer after elimination of the dimerization capacity of the ligand-binding domains by mutation of P463 in helix 10. The data presented here reveal that the complex formation of ligand-binding domains EcR and USP ligand is different.     

Dynamic of ligand binding to Drosophila melanogaster ecdysteroid receptor

Ligand binding to ecdysone receptor (EcR) is an autonomous function of the ligand binding domain (LBD) and is not modified by other receptor domains or tags fused to the LBD. Association and dissociation velocity of hormone to EcR was studied in the absence and presence of its main dimerization partner Ultraspiracle (USP). Mutational analysis of the EcR(LBD) revealed that ligand entry and exit is affected differently by the same point mutation, indicating that different pathways are used for association and dissociation of the ligand. Heterodimerization with wild type USP(LBD) increases ligand association to EcR(LBD) about fivefold and reduces dissociation 18-fold. Opposite effects of the same mutation (N626K) on dissociation velocity of ligand in EcR and EcR/USP indicate that not only hormone binding itself, but also the kinetic behaviour of ligand binding is modified by the dimerization partner. A general effect of the point mutations on the 3D architecture seems unlikely due to the highly selective effects on the kinetics of hormone binding.     

Characterization of the ligand-binding domain of the ecdysteroid receptor from Drosophila melanogaster

Mutants created by site-directed mutagenesis were used to elucidate the function of amino acids involved in ligand binding to ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and heterodimer formation with ultraspiracle (USP). The results demonstrate the importance of the C-terminal part of the D-domain and helix 12 of EcR for hormone binding. Some amino acids are involved either in ligand binding to EcR (E476, M504, D572, I617, N626) or ligand-dependent heterodimerization as determined by gel mobility shift assays (A612, L615, T619), while others are involved in both functions (K497, E648). Some amino acids are suboptimal for ligand binding (L615, T619), but mediate ligand-dependent dimerization. We conclude that the enhanced regulatory potential by ligand-dependent modulation of dimerization in the wild type is achieved at the expense of optimal ligand binding. Mutation of amino acids (K497, E648) involved in the salt bridge between helix 4 and 12 impair ligand binding to EcR more severely than hormone binding to the heterodimer, indicating that to some extent heterodimerization compensates for the deleterious effect of certain mutations. Different effects of the same point mutations on ligand binding to EcR and EcR/USP (R511, A612, L615, I617, T619, N626) indicate that the ligand-binding pocket is modified by heterodimerization.     

Molecular determinants of differential ligand sensitivities of insect ecdysteroid receptors

The functional receptor for insect ecdysteroid hormones is a heterodimer consisting of two nuclear hormone receptors, ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and the retinoid X receptor homologue Ultraspiracle (USP). Although ecdysone is commonly thought to be a hormone precursor and 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), the physiologically active steroid, little is known about the relative activity of ecdysteroids in various arthropods. As a step toward characterization of potential differential ligand recognition, we have analyzed the activities of various ecdysteroids using gel mobility shift assays and transfection assays in Schneider-2 (S2) cells. Ecdysone showed little activation of the Drosophila melanogaster receptor complex (DmEcR-USP). In contrast, this steroid functioned as a potent ligand for the mosquito Aedes aegypti receptor complex (AaEcR-USP), significantly enhancing DNA binding and transactivating a reporter gene in S2 cells. The mosquito receptor also displayed higher hormone-independent DNA binding activity than the Drosophila receptor. Subunit-swapping experiments indicated that the EcR protein, not the USP protein, was responsible for ligand specificity. Using domain-swapping techniques, we made a series of Aedes and Drosophila EcR chimeric constructs. Differential ligand responsiveness was mapped near the C terminus of the ligand binding domain, within the identity box previously implicated in the dimerization specificity of nuclear receptors. This region includes helices 9 and 10, as determined by comparison with available crystal structures obtained from other nuclear receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that Phe529 in Aedes EcR, corresponding to Tyr611 in Drosophila EcR, was most critical for ligand specificity and hormone-independent DNA binding activity. These results demonstrated that ecdysone could function as a bona fide ligand in a species-specific manner.     

Spatial patterns of ecdysteroid receptor activation during the onset of Drosophila metamorphosis

Ecdysteroid signaling in insects is transduced by a heterodimer of the EcR and USP nuclear receptors. In order to monitor the temporal and spatial patterns of ecdysteroid signaling in vivo we established transgenic animals that express a fusion of the GAL4 DNA binding domain and the ligand binding domain (LBD) of EcR or USP, combined with a GAL4-dependent lacZ reporter gene. The patterns of beta-galactosidase expression in these animals indicate where and when the GAL4-LBD fusion protein has been activated by its ligand in vivo. We show that the patterns of GAL4-EcR and GAL4-USP activation at the onset of metamorphosis reflect what would be predicted for ecdysteroid activation of the EcR/USP heterodimer. No activation is seen in mid-third instar larvae when the ecdysteroid titer is low, and strong widespread activation is observed at the end of the instar when the ecdysteroid titer is high. In addition, both GAL4-EcR and GAL4-USP are activated in larval organs cultured with 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E), consistent with EcR/USP acting as a 20E receptor. We also show that GAL4-USP activation depends on EcR, suggesting that USP requires its heterodimer partner to function as an activator in vivo. Interestingly, we observe no GAL4-LBD activation in the imaginal discs and ring glands of late third instar larvae. Addition of 20E to cultured mid-third instar imaginal discs results in GAL4-USP activation, but this response is not seen in imaginal discs cultured from late third instar larvae, suggesting that EcR/USP loses its ability to function as an efficient activator in this tissue. We conclude that EcR/USP activation by the systemic ecdysteroid signal may be spatially restricted in vivo. Finally, we show that GAL4-EcR functions as a potent and specific dominant negative at the onset of metamorphosis, providing a new tool for characterizing ecdysteroid signaling pathways during development.     

Ligand-induced heterodimerization between the ligand binding domains of the Drosophila ecdysteroid receptor and ultraspiracle.

The insect ecdysteroid receptor consists of a heterodimer between EcR and the RXR-orthologue, USP. We addressed the question of whether this heterodimer, like all other RXR heterodimers, may be formed in the absence of ligand and whether ligand promotes dimerization. We found that C-terminal protein fragments that comprised the ligand binding, but not the DNA binding domain of EcR and USP and which were equipped with the activation or DNA binding region of GAL4, respectively, exhibit a weak ability to interact spontaneously with each other. Moreover, the heterodimer formation is greatly enhanced upon administration of active ecdysteroids in a dose-dependent manner. This was shown in vivo by a yeast two-hybrid system and in vitro by a modified electromobility shift assay. Furthermore, the EcR fragment expressed in yeast was functional and bound radioactively labelled ecdysteroid specifically. Ligand binding was greatly enhanced by the presence of a USP ligand binding domain. Therefore, ecdysteroids are capable of inducing heterodimer formation between EcR and USP, even when the binding of these receptor proteins to cognate DNA response elements does not occur. This capability may be a regulated aspect of ecdysteroid action during insect development.     

The Drosophila orphan nuclear receptor DHR38 mediates an atypical ecdysteroid signaling pathway

Ecdysteroid pulses trigger the major developmental transitions during the Drosophila life cycle. These hormonal responses are thought to be mediated by the ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and its heterodimeric partner Ultraspiracle (USP). We provide evidence for a second ecdysteroid signaling pathway mediated by DHR38, the Drosophila ortholog of the mammalian NGFI-B subfamily of orphan nuclear receptors. DHR38 also heterodimerizes with USP, and this complex responds to a distinct class of ecdysteroids in a manner that is independent of EcR. This response is unusual in that it does not involve direct binding of ecdysteroids to either DHR38 or USP. X-ray crystallographic analysis of DHR38 reveals the absence of both a classic ligand binding pocket and coactivator binding site, features that seem to be common to all NGFI-B subfamily members. Taken together, these data reveal the existence of a separate structural class of nuclear receptors that is conserved from fly to humans.     

Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the ultraspiracle protein USP, the ortholog of retinoid X receptors in insects

The major postembryonic developmental events happening in insect life, including molting and metamorphosis, are regulated and coordinated temporally by pulses of ecdysone. The biological activity of this steroid hormone is mediated by two nuclear receptors: the ecdysone receptor (EcR) and the Ultraspiracle protein (USP). The crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain from the lepidopteran Heliothis virescens USP reported here shows that the loop connecting helices H1 and H3 precludes the canonical agonist conformation. The key residues that stabilize this unique loop conformation are strictly conserved within the lepidopteran USP family. The presence of an unexpected bound ligand that drives an unusual antagonist conformation confirms the induced-fit mechanism accompanying the ligand binding. The ligand-binding pocket exhibits a retinoid X receptor-like anchoring part near a conserved arginine, which could interact with a USP ligand functional group. The structure of this receptor provides the template for designing inhibitors, which could be utilized as a novel type of environmentally safe insecticides.     

Heterodimerization of ecdysone receptor and ultraspiracle on symmetric and asymmetric response elements

Heterodimerization of nuclear receptors is facilitated by the interaction of two dimerization interfaces: one spanning the DNA-binding (C domain) region and the adjacent hinge (D domain) region, and the other in the ligand-binding (E domain) region. Ultraspiracle (USP) heterodimerizes with ecdysone receptor (EcR) and this complex participates in ecdysone signal transduction. The natural ecdysone response elements (EcREs) discovered so far are asymmetric elements composed of either imperfect palindromes or direct repeats. However, gel mobility shift assays have shown that both symmetric (perfect palindromes) and asymmetric (imperfect palindromes and direct repeats) elements can bind to the EcR/USP complex. Therefore, we analyzed EcR/USP domains involved in heterodimerization on different types of response elements (RE). Gel shift assays using full-length and truncated EcR and USP proteins showed that heterodimerization of these two proteins in the presence of asymmetric RE (DR4 and the natural EcRE hsp27) requires both dimerization interfaces present in CD and E domains of both proteins. In contrast, the dimerization interface present in the E domain of either EcR or USP was not essential for heterodimerization on symmetric RE such as PAL1 or IR1. We conclude that the use of heterodimerization interfaces present in CD and E domains of EcR/USP depends on the nature of response elements they bind to.     

Nuclear localization and DNA binding of ecdysone receptor and ultraspiracle

The Ecdysone receptor (EcR) is distributed between cytoplasm and nucleus in CHO cells. Nuclear localization is increased by the ligand Muristerone A. The most important heterodimerization partner Ultraspiracle (Usp) is localized predominantly in the nucleus. We used the diethylentriamine nitric oxide adduct DETA/NO, which releases NO and destroys the zinc-finger structure of nuclear receptors, to investigate whether nuclear EcR and Usp interact with DNA. If expressed separately, Usp and EcR in the absence of hormone do not interact with DNA. The hormone-induced increase in nuclear EcR is due to enhanced DNA binding. In the presence of Usp, EcR is shifted nearly quantitatively into the nucleus. Only a fraction (approximately 30%) of the heterodimer is sensitive to DETA/NO. Interaction of the heterodimer with DNA is mediated mainly by the C-domain of EcR. Deletion of the DNA-binding domain of Usp only slightly reduces nuclear localization of EcR/Usp, although the nuclear localization signal of Usp is not present anymore. The results indicate that EcR and Usp can enter the nucleus independently, but cotransport of both receptors mediated by dimerization via the ligand binding domains is possible even in the absence of hormone.     

Expression of ecdysteroid receptor and ultraspiracle from Chironomus tentans (Insecta, Diptera) in E. coli and purification in a functional state.

Full length clones of ecdysteroid receptor (EcR) and Ultraspiracle (USP) from Chironomus tentans were expressed as GST fusion proteins in E. coli and purified by affinity chromatography. The absence of detergents during the purification procedure is essential for retaining receptor function, especially ligand binding. Presence of USP is mandatory for ligand binding to EcR, but no other cofactors or posttranslational modifications seem to be important, since Scatchard plots revealed the same characteristics (two high affinity binding sites for Ponasterone A with K(D1)=0.24+/-0.1nM and K(D2)=3.9+/-1.3.nM) as found in 0.4 M NaCl extracts of Chironomus cells. Gel mobility shift assays showed binding of the heterodimer to PAL and DR5 even after removal of the GST-tag, whereas EcR binding to PAL1 is GST-dependent. USP binds preferentially to DR5. Addition of unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate improves ligand binding only slightly. Removal of GST has no effect on (3)H-ponasterone A binding, but alters DNA binding characteristics. Calculation of specific binding (5.3+3.0 nmol/mg GST EcR) revealed that 47+/-26% of purified receptor protein was able to bind ligand. The addition of purified EcR to cell extracts of hormone resistant subclones of the epithelial cell line from C. tentans, which have lost their ability to bind ligand, restores specific binding of (3)H-ponasterone A.     

Functional characterization of ecdysone receptor gene switches in mammalian cells

Regulated expression of transgene is essential in basic research as well as for many therapeutic applications. The main purpose of the present study is to understand the functioning of the ecdysone receptor (EcR)-based gene switch in mammalian cells and to develop improved versions of EcR gene switches. We utilized EcR mutants to develop new EcR gene switches that showed higher ligand sensitivity and higher magnitude of induction of reporter gene expression in the presence of ligand. We also developed monopartite versions of EcR gene switches with reduced size of the components that are accommodated into viral vectors. Ligand binding assays revealed that EcR alone could not bind to the nonsteroidal ligand, RH-2485. The EcR's heterodimeric partner, ultraspiracle, is required for efficient binding of EcR to the ligand. The essential role of retinoid X receptor (RXR) or its insect homolog, ultraspiracle, in EcR function is shown by RXR knockdown experiments using RNAi. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that VP16 (activation domain, AD):GAL4(DNA binding domain, DBD):EcR(ligand binding domain, LBD) or GAL4(DBD):EcR(LBD) fusion proteins can bind to GAL4 response elements in the absence of ligand. The VP16(AD) fusion protein of a chimera between human and locust RXR could heterodimerize with GAL4(DBD):EcR(LBD) in the absence of ligand but the VP16(AD) fusion protein of Homo sapiens RXR requires ligand for its heterodimerization with GAL4(DBD):EcR(LBD).