共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The influence of predatory fish on mayfly drift: extrapolating from experiments to nature 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
1. A knowledge of how individual behaviour affects populations in nature is needed to understand many ecologically important processes, such as the dispersal of larval insects in streams. The influence of chemical cues from drift‐feeding fish on the drift dispersal of mayflies has been documented in small experimental channels (i.e. < 3 m), but their influence on dispersal in natural systems (e.g. 30 m stream reaches) is unclear. 2. Using surveys in 10 Rocky Mountain streams in Western Colorado we examined whether the effects of predatory brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on mayfly drift, that were apparent in stream‐side channels, could also be detected in natural streams. 3. In channel experiments, the drift of Baetis bicaudatus (Baetidae) was more responsive to variation in the concentration of chemical cues from brook trout than that of another mayfly, Epeorus deceptivus (Heptageniidae). The rate of brook trout predation on drifting mayflies of both species in a 2‐m long observation tank was higher during the day (60–75%) but still measurable at night (5–10%). Epeorus individuals released into the water column were more vulnerable to trout predation by both day and night than were Baetis larvae treated similarly. 4. Drift of all mayfly taxa in five fishless streams was aperiodic, whereas their drift was nocturnal in five trout streams. The propensity of mayflies to drift was decreased during the day and increased during the night in trout streams compared with fishless streams. In contrast to the channel experiments, fish biomass and density did not alter the nocturnal nature nor magnitude of mayfly drift in natural streams. 5. In combination, these results indicate that mayflies respond to subtle differences in concentration of fish cues in experimental channels. However, temporal and spatial variation in fish cues available to mayflies in natural streams may have obscured our ability to detect responses at larger scales. 相似文献
2.
ANGUS McINTOSH & BARBARA PECKARSKY 《The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology》2003,35(1):141-148
1. In streams, mayflies (Order Ephemeroptera) are at risk from fish feeding visually in the water column. The effect of fish odour on the behaviour of Baetis bicaudatus from a fishless stream and a trout stream was investigated in four large oval tanks supplied with water from the fishless stream.
2. For each mayfly population, mayfly positioning on the substratum and movement in the water column (drift) were measured during the day and night, over 3 days. Brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) odour was added to two tanks to test the effect of a threat from fish.
3. Throughout the experiment more mayflies from the trout stream were observed on the substratum surface and in the water column during the night than the day, but the magnitude of night drift was less in tanks with fish odour.
4. Baetis from the fishless stream also displayed a nocturnal periodicity in drift and positioning, but their night-time drift was not affected by the presence of fish odour. On the first day of the experiment, however, more mayflies were observed on the substratum surface and drifting in tanks without fish odour during the day.
5. Sensitivity to fish odour may enable mayflies to alter their behaviour according to the risk of predation from fish. 相似文献
2. For each mayfly population, mayfly positioning on the substratum and movement in the water column (drift) were measured during the day and night, over 3 days. Brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) odour was added to two tanks to test the effect of a threat from fish.
3. Throughout the experiment more mayflies from the trout stream were observed on the substratum surface and in the water column during the night than the day, but the magnitude of night drift was less in tanks with fish odour.
4. Baetis from the fishless stream also displayed a nocturnal periodicity in drift and positioning, but their night-time drift was not affected by the presence of fish odour. On the first day of the experiment, however, more mayflies were observed on the substratum surface and drifting in tanks without fish odour during the day.
5. Sensitivity to fish odour may enable mayflies to alter their behaviour according to the risk of predation from fish. 相似文献
3.
Differential behavioural responses of mayflies from streams with and without fish to trout odour 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
1. In streams, mayflies (Order Ephemeroptera) are at risk from fish feeding visually in the water column. The effect of fish odour on the behaviour of Baetis bicaudatus from a fishless stream and a trout stream was investigated in four large oval tanks supplied with water from the fishless stream.
2. For each mayfly population, mayfly positioning on the substratum and movement in the water column (drift) were measured during the day and night, over 3 days. Brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) odour was added to two tanks to test the effect of a threat from fish.
3. Throughout the experiment more mayflies from the trout stream were observed on the substratum surface and in the water column during the night than the day, but the magnitude of night drift was less in tanks with fish odour.
4. Baetis from the fishless stream also displayed a nocturnal periodicity in drift and positioning, but their night-time drift was not affected by the presence of fish odour. On the first day of the experiment, however, more mayflies were observed on the substratum surface and drifting in tanks without fish odour during the day.
5. Sensitivity to fish odour may enable mayflies to alter their behaviour according to the risk of predation from fish. 相似文献
2. For each mayfly population, mayfly positioning on the substratum and movement in the water column (drift) were measured during the day and night, over 3 days. Brook trout ( Salvelinus fontinalis ) odour was added to two tanks to test the effect of a threat from fish.
3. Throughout the experiment more mayflies from the trout stream were observed on the substratum surface and in the water column during the night than the day, but the magnitude of night drift was less in tanks with fish odour.
4. Baetis from the fishless stream also displayed a nocturnal periodicity in drift and positioning, but their night-time drift was not affected by the presence of fish odour. On the first day of the experiment, however, more mayflies were observed on the substratum surface and drifting in tanks without fish odour during the day.
5. Sensitivity to fish odour may enable mayflies to alter their behaviour according to the risk of predation from fish. 相似文献
4.
Nested species subsets, gaps, and discrepancy 总被引:10,自引:0,他引:10
Chemical cues from fish can alter the behaviour of stream invertebrates in experimental tanks but their effect in natural
streams has received little attention. By adding brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) odour to a trout stream in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado, USA, we tested whether changes in the concentration of chemical
cues from visually feeding predatory fish would alter the drift of mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera). Stream water was piped from
stream-side tanks with (odour) and without (control) three brook trout to two locations in the stream 3.5 m upstream of drift
nets at six replicate sites. Five-minute drift samples were collected downstream from odour and control pipes before, during
and after the release of water from the tanks into the stream during both the day and night. Almost all drift occurred at
night and consisted predominantly of Baetis bicaudatus nymphs. The odour manipulation had no measurable effect on Baetis drift during the day but statistical power was low. During the night, however, the drift of large (>0.65 mm head capsule width,
HCW) Baetis nymphs decreased significantly during the odour addition compared to control drift. In contrast, the drift of small nymphs
(≤0.65 mm HCW) increased both during and after the odour addition in comparison to control drift. Since the stream contains
brook trout (0.04–0.18 m−2), and water from the stream (presumably containing fish odour) altered the behaviour of fishless-stream Baetis nymphs in another experiment, we conclude that the changes in Baetis drift density were a response to an increase in the concentration of fish odour in the stream. Furthermore, we were able to
detect the effect within 5 min. of odour addition, indicating that mayfly behavioural response to trout odour was rapid. These
results suggest that mayflies can distinguish different concentrations of trout odour in natural streams and that the response
is size-specific, according to the relative risk of predation of large and small Baetis.
Received: 12 May 1998 / Accepted: 23 October 1998 相似文献
5.
Prey intake by Atlantic salmon Salmo salar and brown trout Salmo trutta was measured across different riparian vegetation types: grassland, open canopy deciduous and closed canopy deciduous, in upland streams in County Mayo, Western Ireland. Fishes were collected by electrofishing while invertebrates were sampled from the benthos using a Surber sampler and drifting invertebrates collected in drift traps. Aquatic invertebrates dominated prey numbers in the diets of 0+ year Atlantic salmon and brown trout and 1+ year Atlantic salmon, whereas terrestrial invertebrates were of greater importance for diets of 1+ and 2+ year brown trout. Terrestrial prey biomass was generally greater than aquatic prey for 1+ and 2+ year brown trout across seasons and riparian types. Prey intake was greatest in spring and summer and least in autumn apart from 2+ year brown trout that sustained feeding into autumn. Total prey numbers captured tended to be greater for all age classes in streams with deciduous riparian canopy. Atlantic salmon consumed more aquatic prey and brown trout more terrestrial prey with an ontogenetic increase in prey species richness and diversity. Atlantic salmon and brown trout diets were most similar in summer. Terrestrial invertebrates provided an important energy subsidy particularly for brown trout. In grassland streams, each fish age class was strongly associated with aquatic, mainly benthic invertebrates. In streams with deciduous riparian canopy cover, diet composition partitioned between conspecifics with older brown trout associated with surface drifting terrestrial invertebrates and older Atlantic salmon associated with aquatic invertebrates with a high drift propensity in the water column and 0+ year fish feeding on benthic aquatic invertebrates. Deciduous riparian canopy cover may therefore facilitate vertical partitioning of feeding position within the water column between sympatric Atlantic salmon and brown trout. Implications for riparian management are discussed. 相似文献
6.
We investigated the fitness and community consequences of behavioural interactions with multiple predators in a four-trophic-level
system. We conducted an experiment in oval flow-through artificial-stream tanks to examine the single and interactive sublethal
effects of brook trout and stoneflies on the size at emergence of Baetis bicaudatus (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae), and the cascading trophic effects on algal biomass, the food resource of the mayflies. No predation
was allowed in the experiment, so that all effects were mediated through predator modifications of prey behaviour. We reared
trout stream Baetis larvae from just before egg development until emergence in tanks with four treatments: (1) water from a holding tank with
two brook trout (trout odour), (2) no trout odour + eight stoneflies with glued mouthparts, (3) trout odour + stoneflies and
(4) no trout odour or stoneflies. We ended the experiment after 3 weeks when ten male and ten female subimagos had emerged
from each tank, measured the size of ten male and ten female mature nymphs (with black wing pads), and collected algal samples
from rocks at six locations in each tank. To determine the mechanism responsible for sublethal and cascading effects on lower
trophic levels we made day and night observations of mayfly behaviour for the first 6 days by counting mayflies drifting in
the water column and visible on natural substrata in the artificial streams. Trout odour and stoneflies similarly reduced
the size of male and female Baetis emerging from artificial streams, with non-additive effects of both predators. While smaller females are less fecund, a fitness
cost of small male size has not been determined. The mechanism causing sublethal effects on Baetis differed between predators. While trout stream Baetis retained their nocturnal periodicity in all treatments, stoneflies increased drift dispersal of mayflies at night, and trout
suppressed night-time feeding and drift of mayflies. Stoneflies had less effect on Baetis behaviour when fish odour was present. Thus, we attribute the non-additivity of effects of fish and stoneflies on mayfly
growth to an interaction modification whereby trout odour reduced the impact of stoneflies on Baetis behaviour. Since stonefly activity was also reduced in the presence of fish odour, this modification may be attributed to
the effect of fish odour on stonefly behaviour. Only stoneflies delayed Baetis emergence, suggesting that stoneflies had a greater sublethal effect on Baetis fitness than did trout. Delayed emergence may reduce Baetis fitness by increasing risks of predation and parasitism on larvae, and increasing competition for mates or oviposition sites
among adults. Finally, algal biomass was higher in tanks with both predators than in the other three treatments. These data
implicate a behavioural trophic cascade because predators were not allowed to consume prey. Therefore, differences in algal
biomass were attributed to predator-induced changes in mayfly behaviour. Our study demonstrates the importance of considering
multiple predators when measuring direct sublethal effects of predators on prey fitness and indirect effects on lower trophic
levels. Identification of an interaction modification illustrates the value of obtaining detailed information on behavioural
mechanisms as an aid to understanding the complex interactions occurring among components of ecological communities.
Received: 20 March 1997 / Accepted: 29 September 1997 相似文献
7.
William D. Skinner 《Hydrobiologia》1985,124(3):283-285
A test of Allan's (1978) hypothesis about differential drift abundance of mayflies of the genus Baetis between night and day, and the size of larvae was performed at a mountain stream in Idaho. Palisades Creek, Idaho, contains a different species of mayfly, B. tricaudatus, and vertebrate predator, Salmo clarki, than Cement Creek, Colorado (B. bicaudatus, and brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis). Consequently it was not known if B. tricaudatus would exhibit a similar pattern as its congener in Cement Creek, with large instars tending to avoid daylight drift, as found by Allan (1978). However, similar results were observed in the present study. It appears that the earlier hypothesis may have generality for geographically distinct streams with a different vertebrate predator and mayfly prey. The existence of a similar pattern for chironomid larvae was also tested, however, no such pattern existed. This discrepency between taxa may be due to differential predation, or to inherent differences in drift abilities. 相似文献
8.
9.
Presence of sculpins (Cottus gobio) reduces drift and activity of Gammarus pulex (Amphipoda) 总被引:5,自引:5,他引:0
K. G. Andersson C. Brönmark J. Herrmann B. Malmqvist C. Otto P. Sjörström 《Hydrobiologia》1986,133(3):209-215
Introduction of sculpins into a stream previously devoid of these predators significantly reduced drift rate of Gammarus pulex. The drift of insect larvae was not affected. High amounts of exudates after implantation of sculpins were probably responsible for the low number of drifting G. pulex specimens. Laboratory experiments confirmed reduced locomotory activity of G. pulex when exposed to caged sculpins, an observation that excludes reduced drift activity as a result only of predation.The average size of drifting G. pulex specimens was larger during the night than during the day. This result is in accordance with the hypothesis that large individuals should, in relation to small ones, turn nocturnal because of greater predation risk during daytime. Presence of sculpins did not alter the size composition of drifting G. pulex. 相似文献
10.
M. V. Astakhov 《Inland Water Biology》2014,7(1):48-55
Diurnal dynamics of invertebrate drift in the Kedrovaya River (Primorsky Krai, Russia), which flows in the zone of influence of the monsoon climate, has been studied. It has been shown that drifting invertebrates tend to shift from a predominantly daytime drift pattern to a distinguished nocturnal drift pattern during the frost-free period. The ratio of the total number of nighttime migrants to the total number of daytime migrants increased with every subsequent month. It has been proposed that the degree of light contrast between day and night can be significant in the regulation of nocturnal drift intensity. 相似文献
11.
Invertebrate drift in a large, braided New Zealand river 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
1. The spatio-temporal patterns of drifting macroinvertebrates in a large, braided New Zealand river were determined by sampling with drift nets, seasonally, for 1 year. 2. Drift densities were greatest in autumn, and at night in all seasons except winter. A greater proportion of larger animals drifted at night than during the day in all seasons. Mean annual drift densities were ninety-six animals 100m?3 and 47 mg dry weight 100 m?3. 3. There were relatively few taxa in the drift, and the mayfly Deleatidium spp. comprised more than 85% of the drifting aquatic invertebrates in all seasons except autumn. Chironomidae and terrestrial forms were the only other groups to occur at densities of more than one animal 100 m?3 in all seasons. 4. Drift density was positively correlated with benthic density, which in turn was adversely affected by floods, particularly during spring and summer. 相似文献
12.
13.
Facilitation and interference among three predators affect their consumption of a stream-dwelling mayfly 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
ERIKA NILSSON PIA HERTONSSON MARIKA STENBERG JAKOB BRODERSEN KARIN OLSSON PATRIK STENROTH THOMAS LAKOWITZ CHRISTER BRÖNMARK PER NYSTRÖM ANGUS R. MCINTOSH 《Freshwater Biology》2006,51(8):1507-1514
1. We experimentally tested if a multiplicative risk model accurately predicted the consumption of a common mayfly at risk of predation from three predator species in New Zealand streams. Deviations between model predictions and experimental observations were interpreted as indicators of ecologically important interactions between predators. 2. The predators included a drift‐feeding fish [brown trout (T), Salmo trutta], a benthivorous fish [galaxiid (G), koaro, Galaxias brevipennis] and a benthic predatory stonefly (S; Stenoperla sp.) with Deleatidium sp. mayflies as prey. Eight treatments with all predator species combinations and a predator‐free control were used. Experiments were performed in aquaria with cobbles as predator refuges for mayflies and we measured the proportion of prey consumed after 6 h for both day and night trials. 3. Trout consumed a higher proportion of prey than other predators. For the two predator treatments we found less than expected prey consumption in the galaxiid + trout treatment (G + T) for both day and night trials, whereas a higher than expected proportion of prey was consumed during night time in the stonefly + trout (S + T) treatment. 4. The results indicate interference (G + T) and facilitation (S + T) between predators depending on predator identity and time of day. Thus, to make accurate predictions of interspecific interactions, it is necessary to consider the ecology of individual species and how differences influence the direction and magnitude of interactions. 相似文献
14.
N. Friberg T. H. Andersen H. O. Hansen T. M. Iversen D. Jacobsen L. Krøjgaard S. E. Larsen 《Hydrobiologia》1994,294(2):105-110
The effect of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) on invertebrate drift density was examined in three previously fish-free springbrooks. Drift density was studied during the day following the sequential introduction of: 1) empty cages, 2) cages containing trout, and 3) empty cages. Each period lasted three whole days, and drift density was measured at daytime and night-time every day. Control drift density was determined using empty cages in two similar springbrooks.Night-time drift density of large Gammarus pulex L. (>3.9 mg DW ind–1) decreased compared to that of smaller size-groups following trout introduction, and was significantly lower (p<0.05) than the pre-introductory level after the trout had been removed again.The daytime drift density of large G. pulex remained unchanged, as did both daytime and night-time drift density of smaller size-groups of G. pulex, and the other taxa investigated (Leuctra hippopus (Kempny), Leuctra nigra (Olivier), Amphimura sp., Nemoura flexuosa Aubert, and Baetis rhodani (Pict.)). No significant changes in drift density were observed in two control springbrooks. 相似文献
15.
Reduction of predation risk under the cover of darkness: Avoidance responses of mayfly larvae to a benthic fish 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Summary Mayfly larvae of Paraleptophlebia heteronea (McDunnough) had two antipredator responses to a nocturnal fish predator (Rhinichthys cataractae (Valenciennes)): flight into the drift and retreat into interstitial crevices. Drift rates of Paraleptophlebia abruptly increased by 30 fold when fish were actively foraging in the laboratory streams but, even before fish were removed, drift began returning to control levels because larvae settled to the substrate and moved to areas of low risk beneath stones. This drifting response was used as an immediate escape behavior which likely decreases risk of capture from predators which forage actively at night. Surprisingly, drift most often occurred before contact between predator and prey, and we suggest that in darkness this mayfly may use hydrodynamic pressure waves for predator detection, rather than chemical cues, since fish forage in an upstream direction. Although drifting may represent a cost to mayfly larvae in terms of relocation to a new foraging area with unknown food resources, the immediate mortality risk probably out-weighs the importance of staying within a profitable food patch because larvae can survive starvation for at least 2 d. In addition to drifting, mayflies retreated from upper, exposed substrate surfaces to concealed interstitial crevices immediately after a predator encounter, or subsequent to resettlement on the substrate after predator-induced drift. A latency period was associated with this response and mayflies remained in these concealed locations for at least 3 h after dace foraging ceased. Because this mayfly feeds at night and food levels are significantly lower in field refugia under stones, relative to exposed stone surfaces, predator avoidance activity may limit foraging time and, ultimately, reduce the food intake of this stream mayfly. 相似文献
16.
An artificial discharge of water (3.0 m3/sec), over a 48 h period, from an impoundment into the R. Wye did not substantially affect water temperature or concentrations of dissolved oxygen and suspended solids at a site 16 km below the impoundment. However, the load of suspended material on the second day of the release was about 10 times greater than the pre-release load. The total number of drifting macroinvertebrates on the first and second days of the release were about 7 and 3 times greater than the number on the day preceding the release. The initial increase in flow at 15.00 h resulted in an immediate increase in the number of drifting larvae of Rheotanytarsus, a tubicolous chironomid. Subsequently there was an enhanced night-time increase in the total number of drifting invertebrates, particularly the mayfly, Ephemerella ignita (Poda), and this also occurred on the second night of the release. Increases in the number of drifting Rheotanytarsus and Ephemerella, the most abundant invertebrates, resulted in increase in drift density.Authors' address Llysdinam Field Centre, UWIST, Newbridge-on-Wye, Llandrindod Wells, Powys, Wales. 相似文献
17.
1. The predominantly nocturnal constrained drift of stream invertebrates is commonly regarded as a behaviour that avoids encounters with visually foraging fish in the water column. The alternative explanation, that drift peaks are caused by bottom-feeding, nocturnal predators, has rarely been tested.
2. We examined these hypotheses by collecting invertebrate drift in five streams in northern Finland: one with brown trout ( Salmo trutta , a drift-feeding fish), one with alpine bullhead ( Cottus poecilopus , a benthic fish), one with both species, and two fishless streams.
3. Drift by Baetis mayflies was aperiodic or slightly diurnal in both fishless streams on all sampling occasions. In contrast, drift was nocturnal in streams with trout and, to a lesser extent, in the stream with bullhead. Non-dipteran prey drifted mainly nocturnally in all streams with fish, whereas Diptera larvae were less responsive to the presence of fish.
4. In laboratory experiments, bullheads were night-active, causing a much higher frequency of drift by touching Baetis at night than during the day. Thus, increased nocturnal drift may serve to avoid both visual predators (a pre-contact response) and benthic fish (a post-contact response). In streams with bottom-feeding fish, nocturnal drift should be caused by increased drift by night rather than by reduced drift by day. 相似文献
2. We examined these hypotheses by collecting invertebrate drift in five streams in northern Finland: one with brown trout ( Salmo trutta , a drift-feeding fish), one with alpine bullhead ( Cottus poecilopus , a benthic fish), one with both species, and two fishless streams.
3. Drift by Baetis mayflies was aperiodic or slightly diurnal in both fishless streams on all sampling occasions. In contrast, drift was nocturnal in streams with trout and, to a lesser extent, in the stream with bullhead. Non-dipteran prey drifted mainly nocturnally in all streams with fish, whereas Diptera larvae were less responsive to the presence of fish.
4. In laboratory experiments, bullheads were night-active, causing a much higher frequency of drift by touching Baetis at night than during the day. Thus, increased nocturnal drift may serve to avoid both visual predators (a pre-contact response) and benthic fish (a post-contact response). In streams with bottom-feeding fish, nocturnal drift should be caused by increased drift by night rather than by reduced drift by day. 相似文献
18.
Drift patterns in a high Andean stream 总被引:5,自引:5,他引:0
The drifting of invertebrates was sampled for six 24-hour periods from September 1976 to July 1977 in a small stream of the paramo of the Ecuadorian Andes. The composition of the drift is similar to that of the benthos, though percentages may differ markedly. Drift is relatively constant throughout the year, except in March when unusually high rates were noted; at this same period a marked reduction in the benthos was also observed. Diel periodicities in the drift are unclear, although on the whole drift is more important during the daytime; when individual data series are analyzed, weak patterns of day or night drifting can be recognized in some groups. The input of insects through drift from the small streams is thought to be an important source of food for the salmonid fish inhabiting the larger torrents. 相似文献
19.
Experiments in laboratory stream channels compared the behaviour of Deleatidium mayfly nymphs in the absence of fish with that in the presence of either native common river galaxias (Galaxias vulgaris Stokell) or introduced brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Galaxias present similar predation risks to prey during day and night but are more active at night. Whereas, trout present a higher predation risk during the day. Deleatidium maintained a fixed nocturnal drift periodicity that is characteristic of streams containing visually feeding fish regardless of the nature of the predation regime presented in the laboratory. However, the number on the substratum surface, and therefore able to graze algae, was lower when fish were present than when they were absent. The number was lower during the day in the presence of trout, when they present the highest predation risk, and lower during the night compared to the day in trials with galaxias when galaxias activity disturbs Deleatidium from the substratum. Increases in the probability of Deleatidium leaving a patch, reductions in the proportion of mayflies on high quality patches and reductions in the distance travelled from refuge also reflected variations in the predation regime. Similar differences in positioning were observed under the same predation regimes in in situ channels in the Shag River and these were associated with differences in algal biomass. Algal ash-free dry mass (AFDM) and chlorophyll a (chl a) were higher on the tops of cobbles when fish were present. Fish also affected the biomass and the distribution of algae on cobbles as AFDM and chl a were higher on the sides of cobbles from channels with trout compared to those with galaxias. Changes in grazing behaviour, caused by predator avoidance, are likely to have been responsible for differences in algal biomass because no significant differences were detected between treatments in the biomass of Deleatidium or of total invertebrates. 相似文献
20.
Animal population dynamics in open systems are affected not only by agents of mortality and the influence of species interactions
on behavior and life histories, but also by dispersal and recruitment. We used an extensive data set to compare natural loss
rates of two mayfly species that co-occur in high-elevation streams varying in predation risk, and experience different abiotic
conditions during larval development. Our goals were to generate hypotheses relating predation to variation in prey population
dynamics and to evaluate alternative mechanisms to explain such variation. While neither loss rates nor abundance of the species
that develops during snowmelt (Baetis bicaudatus) varied systematically with fish, loss rates of the species that develops during baseflow (Baetis B) were higher in streams containing brook trout than streams without fish; and surprisingly, larvae of this species were
most abundant in trout streams. This counter-intuitive pattern could not be explained by a trophic cascade, because densities
of intermediate predators (stoneflies) did not differ between fish and fishless streams and predation by trout on stoneflies
was negligible. A statistical model estimated that higher recruitment and accelerated development enables Baetis B to maintain larger populations in trout streams despite higher mortality from predation. Experimental estimates suggested
that predation by trout potentially accounts for natural losses of Baetis B, but not Baetis bicaudatus. Predation by stoneflies on Baetis is negligible in fish streams, but could make an important contribution to observed losses of both species in fishless streams.
Non-predatory sources of loss were higher for B. bicaudatus in trout streams, and for Baetis B in fishless streams. We conclude that predation alone cannot explain variation in population dynamics of either species;
and the relative importance of predation is species- and environment-specific compared to non-predatory losses, such as other
agents of mortality and non-consumptive effects of predators.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. 相似文献