小麦生长素结合基因TaABP1-D的表达与染色体定位

生长素影响了植物生长发育的诸多过程。生长素结合蛋白ABP1(auxin binding protein)作为一种生长素受体,在质膜上生长素诱导的快速反应中起重要作用。小麦中已经克隆获得了TaABP1-D,但其在细胞中的作用位置以及在染色体的定位情况仍不明确。本研究利用洋葱表皮细胞瞬时表达系统对小麦生长素结合基因TaABP1-D进行亚细胞定位,结果表明TaABP1-D蛋白为膜蛋白,存在于细胞质和细胞膜中;同时利用中国春缺体-四体材料和信息学方法,将TaABP1-D定位在小麦5D染色体长臂的近着丝粒位置上,距两侧EST标记BE490079和BE405060的遗传距离分别为0.51 c M和0.28 c M。     

矮泰引-3中半矮秆基因的分子定位

矮泰引-3的矮生性状受两对独立遗传的半矮秆基因控制,利用SSR标记将这两个矮秆基因分别定位到第1和第4染色体上。等位性测交的结果表明,位于第1染色体上的矮秆基因与sd1是等位的,所以仍然称其为sd1;而位于第4染色体上的矮秆基因是一个新基因,暂命名为sdt2。利用SSR标记将sd1定位于RM297、RM302和RM212的同一侧,而与OSR3共分离,它们之间的位置关系可能是RM297-RM302-RM212-OSR3-sd1,遗传距离分别为4．7cM、0cM、0．8cM和0cM,这与sd1在第1染色体长臂上的确切位置是基本一致的。利用已有的SSR标记和拓展的SSR标记将sdt2定位于SSR332、RM1305和RM5633、RM307、RM401之间,它们的排列位置可能是SSR332-RM1305-sdt2-RM5633-RM307-RM401,它们之间的遗传距离分别为11．6cM、3．8cM、0．4cM、0cM和0．4cM。     

小麦农家品种赤壳中一个主效抗条锈病基因的微卫星标记和定位

小麦农家品种赤壳(苏1900)对当前我国小麦条锈菌(Puccinia striiformis Westend.f.sp.tritici)多个流行小种均有较好抗性。遗传分析表明,该品种对条中32号小种的抗性是由一对显性基因控制。本文采用分离群体分析法(bulked segregant analysis,BSA)和微卫星多态性分析方法,对该基因进行了分子标记和定位研究。用Taichung29×赤壳的F2代分离群体建立抗、感DNA池,共筛选了400多对SSR引物,发现5个标记Xwmc44、Xgwm259、Xwmc367、Xcfa2292、Xbarc80在抗、感DNA池间与在抗、感亲本间同样具有多态性,它们均位于1BL染色体臂上。经用具有140株抗病株、60株感病株共200株植株的F2代分离群体进行的遗传连锁性检测,上述5个标记均与目的基因相连锁,遗传距离分别为8.3cM、9.1cM、17.2cM、20.6cM和31.6cM。用全套21个中国春缺-四体材料进行的检测进一步证实了这5个SSR标记均位于小麦1B染色体上。综合上述结果,将赤壳中的主效抗条锈病基因YrChk定位在1BL染色体臂上。与以前已定位于1B染色体上的抗条锈病基因的比较研究表明,YrChk基因可能是一个新的抗条锈病基因。小麦农家品种中抗病基因资源的发掘和利用将有助于提高我国小麦生产品种中的抗病基因丰富度,有助于改善长期以来小麦生产品种中抗病基因单一化的局面。     

玉米抗甘蔗花叶病毒基因的比较定位

收集了玉米抗甘蔗花叶病毒基因/QTL定位信息, 借助玉米遗传图谱IBM2 2005 Neighbors进行了整合。在国内外研究中, 累计报道81个抗病毒基因位点, 分布在玉米7条染色体上, 比较定位发现这些位点集中分布于第3和6染色体。采用元分析技术, 确定3个“一致性”抗病毒QTL, 其中1个位于第3染色体, 在遗传图谱IBM2 2005 Neighbors上覆盖的范围为6.44 cM; 2个位于第6染色体, 覆盖范围分别为6.16 cM和27.48 cM。借助比较基因组学策略, 在第3染色体“一致性”QTL区间内筛选出4个抗病位置候选基因。该研究结果为确定和克隆抗病主效基因提供了基础。     

定位转基因所在的小麦基因组的细胞遗传学方法

本文设计了一种利用细胞遗传学原理定位转基因小麦部转基因所在的基因组的系统方法,并对该方法的有效性和可靠性进行了验证。该方法利用分别含有AABB、AADD和BBDD基因组的小麦近缘四倍体与等测转基因小麦杂交,F1一倍体与同源非转化品种回交,根据回交群体中在抗性基因控制的性状上的分离比例以及各个体的染色体数目分析,从而对转基因小麦中转基因所在的基因组进行定位,该方法简单、可靠,实用性强,可供相关研究采用。     

小麦新抗源CH5383抗条锈病基因的遗传分析及分子定位

CH5383是新育成的源于中间偃麦草的渗入系,对小麦条锈病和白粉病均表现免疫。为明确其抗性来源、遗传方式和抗病基因在染色体上的位置,将CH5383的系谱材料及其与高感条锈病品种(系)杂交的F1、F2和F2:3家系群体进行条锈病抗性鉴定。结果表明,CH5383对条锈病的抗性源于中间偃麦草,对条锈病生理小种CYR32的抗性由一对显性核基因控制,将此基因暂时命名为YrCH5383。从476对SSR引物中筛选到3对引物Xgwm108、Xbarc206和Xbarc77与抗病基因连锁,遗传距离分别是8.2 cM、10.7 cM和13.6 cM。根据这两对标记在染色体上的位置,将抗病基因定位到3B染色体的长臂上。3B染色体的长臂还未见有正式命名的抗条锈病基因的报道,推测YrCH5383可能是一个源于中间偃麦草的新抗条锈病基因。     

小麦抗白粉病基因SSR标记定位

从波兰小麦与普通小麦感病品系‘中13’杂交后代中选育出小麦抗源材料WP6192,田间表现高抗白粉病,遗传分析表明其含有1对显性抗白粉病基因,暂定名为PmWP6192。用分离群体分组分析法筛选多态性SSR标记,并用F2代群体进行遗传连锁分析。结果表明,SSR标记Xgwm515、Xgwm249、Xgwm425、Xgwm372、Xg-wm630、Xbarc10、Xbarc220、Xbarc201和Xbarc353与PmWP6192基因连锁,相距最近的标记是Xbarc353,遗传距离为2.3cM。根据连锁标记所在的染色体位置,将PmWP6192定位于2AL染色体。通过基因来源分析和2AL染色体上已有抗白粉病基因的等位性分子检测,推断PmWP6192可能是1个新的抗白粉病基因。     

粗山羊草抗条锈病新基因YrY206遗传分析和微卫星 标记

从小麦野生近缘属——粗山羊草中挖掘小麦条锈病抗病基因, 拓展小麦抗病性的遗传基础。利用抗小麦条锈病与感小麦条锈病的粗山羊草间杂交, 从粗山羊草[Aegilops tauschii (Coss.) Schmal] Y206中鉴定出1个显性抗小麦条锈病基因, 暂定名为YrY206。应用分离群体分组法(Bulked segregant analysis, BSA)筛选到Wmc11a、Xgwm71c、Xgwm161和Xgwm183标记, 与该基因之间的遗传距离分别为4.0、3.3、1.5和9.3 cM。根据连锁标记所在小麦微卫星图谱的位置, YrY206被定位在3DS染色体上。分析基因所在染色体的位置、抗病性特征, 认为YrY206是一个新的抗小麦条锈病基因。     

小麦农家品种红麦(苏1661)中一个主效抗条锈病基因的微卫星标记定位

应用分离体分组混合分析法（bulked segregant analysis,BSA）和微卫星标记多态性分析方法,对红麦（保存单位编号：苏1661;统一编号：ZM008712）中的一个主效抗条锈病基因YrHm进行了分子标记和定位研究。共用512对微卫星引物对抗、感基因池进行了多态性分析,经用包括230个单株的F2分离群体进行遗传连锁性检测,发现4个与YrHm基因连锁的微卫星标记Xgwm904、Xbarcl73、Xcfdl3和Xcfd42,均位于小麦染色体6D短臂上。经Mapmaker3．0b软件计算,这4个标记与目的基因间的遗传距离分别为7．3、25．1、47．7和62．1cM,均位于YrHm基因远离染色体顶端的一侧。用全套中国春小麦缺体一四体材料进行检测,进一步确认了这4个标记均位于小麦6D染色体。因此,将YrHm基因定位于小麦染色体臂6DS上。     

来自粗山羊草抗条锈病基因的SSR标记

从粗山羊草[Aegilops tauschii (Coss.) Schmal] Y201中鉴定出1个显性抗小麦条锈病基因, 暂定名为YrY201。应用分离群体分组法(BSA) 筛选到Xgwm273b、Xgwm37和wmc14标记, 与该基因之间的遗传距离分别为11.9、5.8和10.9 cM。根据连锁标记所在小麦微卫星图谱的位置, YrY201被定位在7DL染色体上。分析基因所在染色体的位置及抗病性特征, 认为YrY201是一个新的抗小麦条锈病基因,并可用于分子标记辅助选择。     

Auxin binding protein: curiouser and curiouser

Auxin is implicated in a variety of plant developmental processes, yet the molecular mechanism of auxin response remains largely unknown. Auxin binding protein 1 (ABP1) mediates cell expansion and might be involved in cell cycle control. Structural modeling shows that it is a β-barrel dimer, with the C terminus free to interact with other proteins. We do not know where ABP1 performs its receptor function. Most ABP1 is detected within the endoplasmic reticulum but the evidence indicates that it functions at the plasma membrane. ABP1 is established as a crucial component of auxin signaling, but its precise mechanism remains unclear.     

The auxin-binding protein 1 is essential for the control of cell cycle

The phytohormone auxin has been known for >50 years to be required for entry into the cell cycle. Despite the critical effects exerted by auxin on the control of cell division, the molecular mechanism by which auxin controls this pathway is poorly understood, and how auxin is perceived upstream of any change in the cell cycle is unknown. Auxin Binding Protein 1 (ABP1) is considered to be a candidate auxin receptor, triggering early modification of ion fluxes across the plasma membrane in response to auxin. ABP1 has also been proposed to mediate auxin-dependent cell expansion, and is essential for early embryonic development. We investigated whether ABP1 has a role in the cell cycle. Functional inactivation of ABP1 in the model plant cell system BY2 was achieved through cellular immunization via the conditional expression of a single-chain fragment variable (scFv). This scFv was derived from a well characterized anti-ABP1 monoclonal antibody previously shown to block the activity of the protein. We demonstrate that functional inactivation of ABP1 results in cell-cycle arrest, and provide evidence that ABP1 plays a critical role in regulation of the cell cycle by acting at both the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints. We conclude that ABP1 is essential for the auxin control of cell division and is likely to constitute the first step of the auxin-signalling pathway mediating auxin effects on the cell cycle.     

Overexpression of the Auxin Binding PROTEIN1 Modulates PIN-Dependent Auxin Transport in Tobacco Cells

Background

Auxin binding protein 1 (ABP1) is a putative auxin receptor and its function is indispensable for plant growth and development. ABP1 has been shown to be involved in auxin-dependent regulation of cell division and expansion, in plasma-membrane-related processes such as changes in transmembrane potential, and in the regulation of clathrin-dependent endocytosis. However, the ABP1-regulated downstream pathway remains elusive.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Using auxin transport assays and quantitative analysis of cellular morphology we show that ABP1 regulates auxin efflux from tobacco BY-2 cells. The overexpression of ABP1can counterbalance increased auxin efflux and auxin starvation phenotypes caused by the overexpression of PIN auxin efflux carrier. Relevant mechanism involves the ABP1-controlled vesicle trafficking processes, including positive regulation of endocytosis of PIN auxin efflux carriers, as indicated by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and pharmacological manipulations.

Conclusions/Significance

The findings indicate the involvement of ABP1 in control of rate of auxin transport across plasma membrane emphasizing the role of ABP1 in regulation of PIN activity at the plasma membrane, and highlighting the relevance of ABP1 for the formation of developmentally important, PIN-dependent auxin gradients.     

生长素信号转导研究进展

长素的信号转导是一个复杂的网络系统,在信号的感知上,除了存在ABPI介导的膜上感知途径外,还有其他的感知途径。G蛋白参与诱导生长素信号的胞内传递,生长素信号转导的第二信使包括离子型第二信使、磷酯酶A2、脂活化蛋白激酶、MAPK和PINOIND等。AUX／IAA蛋白的泛素化降解在生长素反应中发挥关键性作用,ARF和AUX／IAA蛋白相互作用调节生长素响应基因的转录。     

Mechanism of auxin interaction with Auxin Binding Protein (ABP1): a molecular dynamics simulation study

Auxin Binding Protein 1 (ABP1) is ubiquitous in green plants. It binds the phytohormone auxin with high specificity and affinity, but its role in auxin-induced processes is unknown. To understand the proposed receptor function of ABP1 we carried out a detailed molecular modeling study. Molecular dynamics simulations showed that ABP1 can adopt two conformations differing primarily in the position of the C-terminus and that one of them is stabilized by auxin binding. This is in agreement with experimental evidence that auxin induces changes at the ABP1 C-terminus. Simulations of ligand egress from ABP1 revealed three main routes by which an auxin molecule can enter or leave the ABP1 binding site. Assuming the previously proposed orientation of ABP1 to plant cell membranes, one of the routes leads to the membrane and the other two to ABP1's aqueous surroundings. A network of hydrogen-bonded water molecules leading from the bulk water to the zinc-coordinated ligands in the ABP1 binding site was formed in all simulations. Water entrance into the zinc coordination sphere occurred simultaneously with auxin egress. These results suggest that the hydrogen-bonded water molecules may assist in protonation and deprotonation of auxin molecules and their egress from the ABP1 binding site.     

ABP1: An auxin receptor for fast responses at the plasma membrane

Auxin-binding protein 1 (ABP1) is an auxin receptor for responses not primarily regulated by gene regulation. One fast response is protoplast swelling. By using immunological ABP1 tools we showed that the highly conserved box a is not alone important for auxin binding. Box c is another part of the auxin binding domain.¹ Here we present a novel method to analyze auxin-induced, ABP1-mediated effects at the plasma membrane on single cell level in vivo. The fluorescence of FM4-64 in the plasma membrane is reduced by auxin and this response is mediated by ABP1. This method indicates a functional role of ABP1 at the plasma membrane.Key words: Auxin-binding protein 1, auxin, receptor, protoplast, plasma membrane, FM4-64     

KDEL-Containing Auxin-Binding Protein Is Secreted to the Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall

The auxin-binding protein ABP1 has been postulated to mediate auxin-induced cellular changes associated with cell expansion. This protein contains the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal, the tetrapeptide lysine-aspartic acid-glutamic acid-leucine (KDEL), at its carboxy terminus, consistent with previous subcellular fractionation data that indicated an ER location for ABP1. We used electron microscopic immunocytochemistry to identify the subcellular localization of ABP1. Using maize (Zea mays) coleoptile tissue and a black Mexican sweet (BMS) maize cell line, we found that ABP1 is located in the ER as expected, but is also on or closely associated with the plasma membrane and within the cell wall. Labeling of the Golgi apparatus suggests that the transport of ABP1 to the cell wall occurs via the secretory system. Inhibition of secretion of an ABP homolog into the medium of BMS cell cultures by brefeldin A, a drug that specifically blocks secretion, is consistent with this secretion pathway. The secreted protein was recognized by an anti-KDEL peptide antibody, strongly supporting the interpretation that movement of this protein out of the ER does not involve loss of the carboxy-terminal signal. Cells starved for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid for 72 h retained less ABP in the cell and secreted more of it into the medium. The significance of our observations is 2-fold. We have identified a KDEL-containing protein that specifically escapes the ER retention system, and we provide an explanation for the apparent discrepancy that most of the ABP is located in the ER, whereas ABP and auxin act at the plasma membrane.