The role of phenotype in gene discovery in the whole genome sequencing era

As whole genome sequence becomes a routine component of gene discovery studies in humans, we will have an exhaustive catalog of genetic variation and the challenge becomes understanding the phenotypic consequences of these variants. Statistical genetic methods and analytical approaches that are concerned with optimizing phenotypes for gene discovery for complex traits offer two general categories of advantages. They may increase power to localize genes of interest and also aid in interpreting associations between genetic variants and disease outcomes by suggesting potential mechanisms and pathways through which genes may affect outcomes. Such phenotype optimization approaches include use of allied phenotypes such as symptoms or ages of onset to reduce genetic heterogeneity within a set of cases, study of quantitative risk factors or endophenotypes, joint analyses of related phenotypes, and derivation of new phenotypes designed to extract independent measures underlying the correlations among a set of related phenotypes through approaches such as principal components. New opportunities are also presented by technological advances that permit efficient collection of hundreds or thousands of phenotypes on an individual, including phenotypes more proximal to the level of gene action such as levels of gene expression, microRNAs, or metabolic and proteomic profiles.     

Identifying genetic risk factors for osteoporosis

Over the past decades epidemiological research of so-called "complex" diseases, i.e., common age-related disorders such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and osteoporosis, has identified anthropometric, behavioural, and serum parameters as risk factors. Recently, genetic polymorphisms have gained considerable interest, propelled by the Human Genome Project and its sequela that have identified most genes and uncovered a plethora of polymorphic variants, some of which embody the genetic risk factors. In all fields of complex disease genetics (including osteoporosis) progress in identifying these genetic factors has been hampered by often controversial results. Because of the small effect size for each individual risk polymorphism, this is mostly due to low statistical power and limitations of analytical methods. Genome-wide scanning approaches can be used to find the responsible genes. It is by now clear that linkage analysis is not suitable for this, but genome-wide association analysis has much better possibilities, as is illustrated by successful identification of risk alleles for several complex diseases. Candidate gene association analysis followed by replication and prospective multi-centred meta-analysis, is currently the best way forward to identify genetic markers for complex traits, such as osteoporosis. To accomplish this, we need large (global) collaborative studies using standardized methodology and definitions, to quantify by meta-analysis the subtle effects of the responsible gene variants.     

Progress and promise of genome-wide association studies for human complex trait genetics

Enormous progress in mapping complex traits in humans has been made in the last 5 yr. There has been early success for prevalent diseases with complex phenotypes. These studies have demonstrated clearly that, while complex traits differ in their underlying genetic architectures, for many common disorders the predominant pattern is that of many loci, individually with small effects on phenotype. For some traits, loci of large effect have been identified. For almost all complex traits studied in humans, the sum of the identified genetic effects comprises only a portion, generally less than half, of the estimated trait heritability. A variety of hypotheses have been proposed to explain why this might be the case, including untested rare variants, and gene-gene and gene-environment interaction. Effort is currently being directed toward implementation of novel analytic approaches and testing rare variants for association with complex traits using imputed variants from the publicly available 1000 Genomes Project resequencing data and from direct resequencing of clinical samples. Through integration with annotations and functional genomic data as well as by in vitro and in vivo experimentation, mapping studies continue to characterize functional variants associated with complex traits and address fundamental issues such as epistasis and pleiotropy. This review focuses primarily on the ways in which genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have revolutionized the field of human quantitative genetics.     

Incorporating Non-Coding Annotations into Rare Variant Analysis

BackgroundThe success of collapsing methods which investigate the combined effect of rare variants on complex traits has so far been limited. The manner in which variants within a gene are selected prior to analysis has a crucial impact on this success, which has resulted in analyses conventionally filtering variants according to their consequence. This study investigates whether an alternative approach to filtering, using annotations from recently developed bioinformatics tools, can aid these types of analyses in comparison to conventional approaches.ConclusionIncorporating variant annotations from non-coding bioinformatics tools should prove to be a valuable asset for rare variant analyses in the future. Filtering by variant consequence is only possible in coding regions of the genome, whereas utilising non-coding bioinformatics annotations provides an opportunity to discover unknown causal variants in non-coding regions as well. This should allow studies to uncover a greater number of causal variants for complex traits and help elucidate their functional role in disease.     

Genetic polymorphisms, lipoproteins and coronary artery disease risk

Association studies between gene variants (polymorphisms) and measured intermediate phenotypes, such as lipid/lipoprotein levels, or disease endpoints such as coronary artery disease, are commonplace in the literature. But have we learnt anything from the shortcomings in study design and analytical strategies that have resulted in much controversy in this field over the last few years? This review highlights some of these problems. Using the lipoprotein lipase gene as an example, we evaluate new approaches to identifying polymorphisms that will stand up to linkage disequilibrium/association studies with complex disorders in this post Human Genome Project age, and emphasize the importance of gene-environment interaction in assessing the impact of gene variants.     

Discovery of rare variants for complex phenotypes

With the rise of sequencing technologies, it is now feasible to assess the role rare variants play in the genetic contribution to complex trait variation. While some of the earlier targeted sequencing studies successfully identified rare variants of large effect, unbiased gene discovery using exome sequencing has experienced limited success for complex traits. Nevertheless, rare variant association studies have demonstrated that rare variants do contribute to phenotypic variability, but sample sizes will likely have to be even larger than those of common variant association studies to be powered for the detection of genes and loci. Large-scale sequencing efforts of tens of thousands of individuals, such as the UK10K Project and aggregation efforts such as the Exome Aggregation Consortium, have made great strides in advancing our knowledge of the landscape of rare variation, but there remain many considerations when studying rare variation in the context of complex traits. We discuss these considerations in this review, presenting a broad range of topics at a high level as an introduction to rare variant analysis in complex traits including the issues of power, study design, sample ascertainment, de novo variation, and statistical testing approaches. Ultimately, as sequencing costs continue to decline, larger sequencing studies will yield clearer insights into the biological consequence of rare mutations and may reveal which genes play a role in the etiology of complex traits.     

Rare variants regulate expression of nearby individual genes in multiple tissues

The rapid decrease in sequencing cost has enabled genetic studies to discover rare variants associated with complex diseases and traits. Once this association is identified, the next step is to understand the genetic mechanism of rare variants on how the variants influence diseases. Similar to the hypothesis of common variants, rare variants may affect diseases by regulating gene expression, and recently, several studies have identified the effects of rare variants on gene expression using heritability and expression outlier analyses. However, identifying individual genes whose expression is regulated by rare variants has been challenging due to the relatively small sample size of expression quantitative trait loci studies and statistical approaches not optimized to detect the effects of rare variants. In this study, we analyze whole-genome sequencing and RNA-seq data of 681 European individuals collected for the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project (v8) to identify individual genes in 49 human tissues whose expression is regulated by rare variants. To improve statistical power, we develop an approach based on a likelihood ratio test that combines effects of multiple rare variants in a nonlinear manner and has higher power than previous approaches. Using GTEx data, we identify many genes regulated by rare variants, and some of them are only regulated by rare variants and not by common variants. We also find that genes regulated by rare variants are enriched for expression outliers and disease-causing genes. These results suggest the regulatory effects of rare variants, which would be important in interpreting associations of rare variants with complex traits.     

Needles in stacks of needles: finding disease-causal variants in a wealth of genomic data

Genome and exome sequencing yield extensive catalogues of human genetic variation. However, pinpointing the few phenotypically causal variants among the many variants present in human genomes remains a major challenge, particularly for rare and complex traits wherein genetic information alone is often insufficient. Here, we review approaches to estimate the deleteriousness of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), which can be used to prioritize disease-causal variants. We describe recent advances in comparative and functional genomics that enable systematic annotation of both coding and non-coding variants. Application and optimization of these methods will be essential to find the genetic answers that sequencing promises to hide in plain sight.     

Will family studies return to prominence in human genetics and genomics? Rare variants and linkage analysis of complex traits

A major focus of modern human genetics has been the search for genetic variations that contribute to human disease. These studies originated in families and used linkage methods as a primary analytical tool. With continued technical improvements, these family-based linkage studies have been very powerful in identifying genes contributing to monogenic disorders. When these methods were applied to disorders with complex, non-Mendelian patterns of inheritance they largely failed. The development of effective capabilities for Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) relegated family-based studies to a peripheral role in human genetics research. Despite the remarkable record of GWAS discoveries, common variations identified in GWAS account for a limited (frequently less than 10%) proportion of the heritable risk of qualitative traits or variance of quantitative traits. Next generation sequencing is facilitating a re-examination of family-based methods with surprising and intriguing results. We propose that rare variants of large effect underlie many linkage peaks, including complex quantitative phenotypes, and review the issues underlying this proposed basis for complex traits.     

EEF1A1 transcription cofactor gene polymorphism is associated with muscle gene expression and residual feed intake in Nelore cattle

Mammalian Genome - Cis-acting effects of noncoding variants on gene expression and regulatory molecules constitute a significant factor for phenotypic variation in complex traits. To provide new...     

Accounting for Population Structure in Gene-by-Environment Interactions in Genome-Wide Association Studies Using Mixed Models

Although genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have discovered numerous novel genetic variants associated with many complex traits and diseases, those genetic variants typically explain only a small fraction of phenotypic variance. Factors that account for phenotypic variance include environmental factors and gene-by-environment interactions (GEIs). Recently, several studies have conducted genome-wide gene-by-environment association analyses and demonstrated important roles of GEIs in complex traits. One of the main challenges in these association studies is to control effects of population structure that may cause spurious associations. Many studies have analyzed how population structure influences statistics of genetic variants and developed several statistical approaches to correct for population structure. However, the impact of population structure on GEI statistics in GWASs has not been extensively studied and nor have there been methods designed to correct for population structure on GEI statistics. In this paper, we show both analytically and empirically that population structure may cause spurious GEIs and use both simulation and two GWAS datasets to support our finding. We propose a statistical approach based on mixed models to account for population structure on GEI statistics. We find that our approach effectively controls population structure on statistics for GEIs as well as for genetic variants.     

Discovering susceptibility genes for asthma and allergy

Asthma and asthma-related traits are complex diseases with strong genetic and environmental components. Rapid progress in asthma genetics has led to the identification of several candidate genes that are associated with asthma-related traits. Typically the phenotypic impact of each of these genes, including the ones most often replicated in association studies, is mild, but larger effects may occur when multiple variants synergize within a permissive environmental context. Despite the achievements made in asthma genetics formidable challenges remain. The development of novel, powerful tools for gene discovery, and a closer integration of genetics and biology, should help to overcome these challenges.     

The genome revolution and its role in understanding complex diseases

The completion of the human genome sequence in 2003 clearly marked the beginning of a new era for biomedical research. It spurred technological progress that was unprecedented in the life sciences, including the development of high-throughput technologies to detect genetic variation and gene expression. The study of genetics has become “big data science”. One of the current goals of genetic research is to use genomic information to further our understanding of common complex diseases. An essential first step made towards this goal was by the identification of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms showing robust association with hundreds of different traits and diseases. As insight into common genetic variation has expanded enormously and the technology to identify more rare variation has become available, we can utilize these advances to gain a better understanding of disease etiology. This will lead to developments in personalized medicine and P4 healthcare. Here, we review some of the historical events and perspectives before and after the completion of the human genome sequence. We also describe the success of large-scale genetic association studies and how these are expected to yield more insight into complex disorders. We show how we can now combine gene-oriented research and systems-based approaches to develop more complex models to help explain the etiology of common diseases. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: From Genome to Function.     

Searching new signals for production traits through gene‐based association analysis in three Italian cattle breeds

Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely applied to disentangle the genetic basis of complex traits. In cattle breeds, classical GWAS approaches with medium‐density marker panels are far from conclusive, especially for complex traits. This is due to the intrinsic limitations of GWAS and the assumptions that are made to step from the association signals to the functional variations. Here, we applied a gene‐based strategy to prioritize genotype–phenotype associations found for milk production and quality traits with classical approaches in three Italian dairy cattle breeds with different sample sizes (Italian Brown n = 745; Italian Holstein n = 2058; Italian Simmental n = 477). Although classical regression on single markers revealed only a single genome‐wide significant genotype–phenotype association, for Italian Holstein, the gene‐based approach identified specific genes in each breed that are associated with milk physiology and mammary gland development. As no standard method has yet been established to step from variation to functional units (i.e., genes), the strategy proposed here may contribute to revealing new genes that play significant roles in complex traits, such as those investigated here, amplifying low association signals using a gene‐centric approach.     

Association analysis of candidate genes for neuropsychiatric disease: the perpetual campaign

Association studies have been proposed to identify the genetic determinants of complex neuropsychiatric traits. Although such studies of candidate genes offer great potential to identify genetic variants that contribute to the expression of psychiatric disease, no consistent associations have been identified. Studies to date have focused on candidate genes that are selected for analysis on the basis of incomplete information about gene function in the brain, therefore the majority of genes expressed in the brain have been ignored. Additionally, most genetic determinants of psychiatric disease will probably be of modest effect and therefore require association studies of large samples. As genomic technologies advance, massive genotyping of large samples should allow identification of alleles that contribute to psychopathology.     

A General and Robust Framework for Secondary Traits Analysis

Case–control designs are commonly employed in genetic association studies. In addition to the case–control status, data on secondary traits are often collected. Directly regressing secondary traits on genetic variants from a case–control sample often leads to biased estimation. Several statistical methods have been proposed to address this issue. The inverse probability weighting (IPW) approach and the semiparametric maximum-likelihood (SPML) approach are the most commonly used. A new weighted estimating equation (WEE) approach is proposed to provide unbiased estimation of genetic associations with secondary traits, by combining observed and counterfactual outcomes. Compared to the existing approaches, WEE is more robust against biased sampling and disease model misspecification. We conducted simulations to evaluate the performance of the WEE under various models and sampling schemes. The WEE demonstrated robustness in all scenarios investigated, had appropriate type I error, and was as powerful or more powerful than the IPW and SPML approaches. We applied the WEE to an asthma case–control study to estimate the associations between the thymic stromal lymphopoietin gene and two secondary traits: overweight status and serum IgE level. The WEE identified two SNPs associated with overweight in logistic regression, three SNPs associated with serum IgE levels in linear regression, and an additional four SNPs that were missed in linear regression to be associated with the 75th quantile of IgE in quantile regression. The WEE approach provides a general and robust secondary analysis framework, which complements the existing approaches and should serve as a valuable tool for identifying new associations with secondary traits.