基于谱图库的蛋白质鉴定策略研究进展

基于质谱的蛋白质组学快速发展,蛋白质质谱数据也呈指数式增长。寻找速度快、准确度高以及重复性好的鉴定方法是该领域的一项重要任务。谱图库搜索策略直接比较实验谱图与谱图库中的真实谱图,充分利用了谱图中的丰度、非常规碎裂模式和其他的一些特征,使得搜索更加快速和准确,成为蛋白质组学的主流鉴定方法之一。文中介绍基于谱图库的蛋白质组质谱数据鉴定策略,并针对其中两个关键步骤——谱图库构建方法和谱图库搜索方法进行深入介绍,探讨了谱图库策略的进展和挑战。     

利用串联质谱鉴定氨基酸突变的生物信息学算法

氨基酸突变能够改变蛋白的结构和功能,影响生物体的生命过程.基于串联质谱的鸟枪法蛋白质组学是目前大规模研究蛋白质组学的主要方法,但是现有的质谱数据鉴定流程为了提高鉴定结果的灵敏度往往会有意压缩数据库中的氨基酸突变信息.因此,如何挖掘数据中的氨基酸突变信息成为当前质谱数据鉴定的一个重要部分.当前应用于氨基酸突变鉴定的串联质谱鉴定方法大致可以分为3大类:基于序列数据库搜索的方法、基于序列标签搜索的算法以及基于图谱库搜索的算法.本文首先详细介绍了这3种氨基酸突变鉴定算法,并分析了各种方法的特点和不足,然后介绍了氨基酸突变鉴定的研究现状和发展方向.随着基于串联质谱的蛋白质组学的不断发展,蛋白序列中的氨基酸突变信息将被更好地解析出来,从而得以深入探讨由氨基酸突变引起的蛋白结构和功能改变,为揭示氨基酸突变的生物学意义奠定基础.     

预测和鉴定蛋白质翻译后修饰的生物信息方法

蛋白质翻译后修饰对蛋白质成熟、结构和功能多样性有决定性的作用。但蛋白质翻译后修饰的多样性、普遍性、动态性,使传统的生物化学方法在全局水平上理解翻译后修饰非常有限,对它们的研究、特别是大规模的研究长期发展缓慢。现在,在实验研究基础上,借助多方面的生物信息学方法,可以快速高通量的预测和鉴定蛋白质翻译后修饰。一方面,可以从序列角度出发,基于酶识别底物的特异性,用位点权重矩阵、支持向量机等算法,从底物蛋白质序列提取修饰相关的保守序列,并用于预测翻译后修饰位点。这种方法相对成熟,能够取得较理想的预测准确性,但不能反映不同时间不同细胞的翻译后修饰状态。另一方面,可从质谱数据分析出发,有望捕获细胞内翻译后修饰的动态特性。质谱分析的高灵敏度、高准确度和高通量的能力已使建立在质谱基础上的蛋白质组学成为研究翻译后修饰的重要工具,生物信息学方法和质谱蛋白质组学的结合则更可以加速研究翻译后修饰的进程。本文从序列和质谱分析两个角度总结评价了各种翻译后修饰相关生物信息学方法的研究近况,重点讨论利用质谱数据鉴定翻译后修饰的新思路。     

基于质谱的蛋白质组学信号网络研究进展

细胞信号转导网络调控着所有细胞和器官的生物学过程。以往信号转导网络的研究主要采用一些生物化学方法开展,如抗体技术。目前,基于质谱的大规模蛋白质组学研究可以在翻译后修饰、蛋白质互作及蛋白质表达水平上,系统地研究信号转导事件。基于蛋白质组学的大规模信号转导的研究将改变我们对信号转导网络的理解。从蛋白质组翻译后修饰、蛋白质互作及蛋白质表达3个方面综述了质谱在信号转导方面的研究。     

N-糖肽的规模化质谱解析方法进展

蛋白质糖基化修饰的鉴定是蛋白质翻译后修饰分析中最具挑战性的任务之一,近几年尤其受到关注.快速发展的质谱技术为规模化的蛋白质糖基化修饰研究提供了有效的手段.与其他基于质谱技术的翻译后修饰鉴定相比,糖基化鉴定的难点在于糖链是大分子而且存在微观不均一性,另外糖链本身可以在串联质谱中碎裂且与肽段的碎裂规律不同,导致蛋白质组学的质谱解析方法和软件难以完整地鉴定肽段序列和糖链结构.完整N-糖肽的鉴定是糖基化分析的热点内容之一,针对N-糖肽的鉴定,近年来,人们开发了多种多样的质谱解析方法,其中包括用N-糖酰胺酶切除糖链后鉴定N-糖基化位点的方法、基于电子转运裂解的糖肽肽段鉴定、基于高能碰撞裂解与电子转运裂解联用或碰撞诱导裂解与三级谱联用的完整N-糖肽鉴定等等.本文对这些质谱解析方法进行了整理和综述,简要指出了目前完整糖肽鉴定软件存在的一些不足,展望了未来的发展方向.     

“自顶向下(top-down)”的蛋白质组学——蛋白质变体的规模化鉴定

高分辨率质谱技术的快速发展使得"自顶向下"的蛋白质组学(top-down proteomics)研究逐渐成熟起来.在完整蛋白质水平上研究蛋白质组可以提供更精准、更丰富的生物学信息,特别是对于蛋白质上发生了多种关联性的翻译后修饰的情况.另外,由于基因突变、RNA可变剪接和大量蛋白质翻译后修饰的存在,同一个基因往往最终会产生多个"蛋白质变体"(proteoform),而要准确地鉴定这些蛋白质变体,也离不开"自顶向下"的蛋白质组学.在蛋白质水平上的分离技术、质谱技术与生物信息学技术是完整蛋白质鉴定最关键的三项技术.高效的分离技术是实现规模化蛋白质变体鉴定的前提,有效的质谱碎裂是提供可靠鉴定的核心,而快速准确的质谱鉴定算法则是数据分析效率的保障.本文对这三项技术进行了详细总结,重点集中在生物信息学相关技术上,包括对完整蛋白质的质谱数据预处理、数据库搜索鉴定以及翻译后修饰定位等几个计算问题的讨论.     

现代质谱技术在蛋白质组学中的应用及其最新进展

简述了蛋白质组学的概念、内容和意义,重点综述了现代质谱技术在蛋白质组学中的应用,主要包括蛋白质和肽段的鉴定和定量、蛋白质翻译后修饰的鉴定和蛋白质间相互作用的检测等。随着新的高质量精确度、分辨率、灵敏度和通量质谱仪的出现,现代质谱技术在蛋白质组学中的应用将越来越广泛,并给蛋白质组学研究带来新的机遇。     

生物质谱与蛋白质组学

蛋白质组学是后基因组学时代最受关注的研究领域之一,其核心的鉴定技术——生物质谱近年来在仪器设计以及鉴定通量、分辨率和灵敏度等各方面均有质的飞跃,促进了蛋白质表达谱作图、定量蛋白质组分析、亚细胞器蛋白质组作图、蛋白质翻译后修饰以及蛋白质相互作用等蛋白质组研究各个领域的飞速发展。本综述了生物质谱技术的最新进展,及其在蛋白质组学研究中的应用。     

串联质谱数据从头解析与蛋白质的数据库搜索鉴定

蛋白质的鉴定是蛋白质组学研究中必不可少的一步。用串联质谱（ｔａｎｄｅｍ ｍａｓｓ ｓｐｅｃｔｒｏｍｅｔｒｙ,ＭＳ／ＭＳ）可以进行多肽的从头测序（ｄｅ ｎｏｖｏ ｓｅｑｕｅｎｃｉｎｇ）,并搜索数据库以鉴定蛋白质。用图论以及真实谱－理论谱联配（ａｌｉｎｇｍｅｎｔ）的方法对串联质谱得到的多肽图谱进行从头解析,得到了可靠的多肽序列,并应用到数据库搜索中鉴定了相应的蛋白质。同时,还用统计的方法对ＳｗｉｓｓＰ     

生物质谱技术在蛋白质组学研究中的应用

随着技术的进步,蛋白质组学的研究重心由最初旨在鉴定细胞或组织内基因组所表达的全部蛋白质转移到从整个蛋白质组水平上阐述包括蛋白翻译后修饰、生物大分子相互作用等反映蛋白质功能的层次。多种质谱离子化技术的突破使质谱技术成为蛋白质组学研究必不可少的手段。质谱技术联合蛋白质组学多角度、深层次探索生命系统分子本质成为现阶段生命科学研究领域的主旋律之一。本文简要综述了肽和蛋白质等生物大分子质谱分析的原理、方式和应用,并对其发展前景做出展望。     

OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification

Mass spectrometry combined with database searching has become the preferred method for identifying proteins in proteomics projects. Proteins are digested by one or several enzymes to obtain peptides, which are analyzed by mass spectrometry. We introduce a new family of scoring schemes, named OLAV, aimed at identifying peptides in a database from their tandem mass spectra. OLAV scoring schemes are based on signal detection theory, and exploit mass spectrometry information more extensively than previously existing schemes. We also introduce a new concept of structural matching that uses pattern detection methods to better separate true from false positives. We show the superiority of OLAV scoring schemes compared to MASCOT, a widely used identification program. We believe that this work introduces a new way of designing scoring schemes that are especially adapted to high-throughput projects such as GeneProt large-scale human plasma project, where it is impractical to check all identifications manually.     

Chromatographic isolation of methionine-containing peptides for gel-free proteome analysis: identification of more than 800 Escherichia coli proteins

A novel gel-free proteomic technology was used to identify more than 800 proteins from 50 million Escherichia coli K12 cells in a single analysis. A peptide mixture is first obtained from a total unfractionated cell lysate, and only the methionine-containing peptides are isolated and identified by mass spectrometry and database searching. The sorting procedure is based on the concept of diagonal chromatography but adapted for highly complex mixtures. Statistical analysis predicts that we have identified more than 40% of the expressed proteome, including soluble and membrane-bound proteins. Next to highly abundant proteins, we also detected low copy number components such as the E. coli lactose operon repressor, illustrating the high dynamic range. The method is about 100 times more sensitive than two-dimensional gel-based methods and is fully automated. The strongest point, however, is the flexibility in the peptide sorting chemistry, which may target the technique toward quantitative proteomics of virtually every class of peptides containing modifiable amino acids, such as phosphopeptides, amino-terminal peptides, etc., adding a new dimension to future proteome research.     

Mass Spectral Analysis of Synthetic Peptides: Implications in Proteomics

Sequence determination of peptides is a crucial step in mass spectrometry–based proteomics. Peptide sequences are determined either by database search or by de novo sequencing using tandem mass spectrometry. Determination of all the theoretical expected peptide fragments and eliminating false discoveries remains a challenge in proteomics. Developing standards for evaluating the performance of mass spectrometers and algorithms used for identification of proteins is important for proteomics studies. The current study is focused on these aspects by using synthetic peptides. A total of 599 peptides were designed from in silico tryptic digest with 1 or 2 missed cleavages from 199 human proteins, and synthetic peptides corresponding to these sequences were obtained. The peptides were mixed together, and analysis was carried out using liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry on a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer. The peptides and proteins were identified with SEQUEST program. The analysis was carried out using the proteomics workflows. A total of 573 peptides representing 196 proteins could be identified, and a spectral library was created for these peptides. Analysis parameters such as “no enzyme selection” gave the maximum number of detected peptides as compared with trypsin in the selection. False discoveries could be identified. This study highlights the limitations of peptide detection and the need for developing powerful algorithms along with tools to evaluate mass spectrometers and algorithms. It also shows the limitations of peptide detection even with high-end mass spectrometers. The mass spectral data are available in ProteomeXchange with accession no. PXD017992.     

Potential for false positive identifications from large databases through tandem mass spectrometry

The biomedical research community at large is increasingly employing shotgun proteomics for large-scale identification of proteins from enzymatic digests. Typically, the approach used to identify proteins and peptides from tandem mass spectral data is based on the matching of experimentally generated tandem mass spectra to the theoretical best match from a protein database. Here, we present the potential difficulties of using such an approach without statistical consideration of the false positive rate, especially when large databases, as are encountered in eukaryotes are considered. This is illustrated by searching a dataset generated from a multidimensional separation of a eukaryotic tryptic digest against an in silico generated random protein database, which generated a significant number of positive matches, even when previously suggested score filtering criteria are used.     

YPED:An Integrated Bioinformatics Suite and Database for Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics Research

We report a significantly-enhanced bioinformatics suite and database for proteomics research called Yale Protein Expression Database(YPED) that is used by investigators at more than 300 institutions worldwide. YPED meets the data management, archival, and analysis needs of a high-throughput mass spectrometry-based proteomics research ranging from a singlelaboratory, group of laboratories within and beyond an institution, to the entire proteomics community. The current version is a significant improvement over the first version in that it contains new modules for liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry(LC–MS/MS) database search results, label and label-free quantitative proteomic analysis, and several scoring outputs for phosphopeptide site localization. In addition, we have added both peptide and protein comparative analysis tools to enable pairwise analysis of distinct peptides/proteins in each sample and of overlapping peptides/proteins between all samples in multiple datasets. We have also implemented a targeted proteomics module for automated multiple reaction monitoring(MRM)/selective reaction monitoring(SRM) assay development. We have linked YPED's database search results and both label-based and label-free fold-change analysis to the Skyline Panorama repository for online spectra visualization. In addition, we have built enhanced functionality to curate peptide identifications into an MS/MS peptide spectral library for all of our protein database search identification results.     

Classification and identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Timely classification and identification of bacteria is of vital importance in many areas of public health. Mass spectrometry-based methods provide an attractive alternative to well-established microbiologic procedures. Mass spectrometry methods can be characterized by the relatively high speed of acquiring taxonomically relevant information. Gel-free mass spectrometry proteomics techniques allow for rapid fingerprinting of bacterial proteins using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry or, for high-throughput sequencing of peptides from protease-digested cellular proteins, using mass analysis of fragments from collision-induced dissociation of peptide ions. The latter technique uses database searching of product ion mass spectra. A database contains a comprehensive list of protein sequences translated from protein-encoding open reading frames found in bacterial genomes. The results of such searches allow the assignment of experimental peptide sequences to matching theoretical bacterial proteomes. Phylogenetic profiles of sequenced peptides are then used to create a matrix of sequence-to-bacterium assignments, which are analyzed using numerical taxonomy tools. The results thereof reveal the relatedness between bacteria, and allow the taxonomic position of an investigated strain to be inferred.     

Classification and identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Timely classification and identification of bacteria is of vital importance in many areas of public health. Mass spectrometry-based methods provide an attractive alternative to well-established microbiologic procedures. Mass spectrometry methods can be characterized by the relatively high speed of acquiring taxonomically relevant information. Gel-free mass spectrometry proteomics techniques allow for rapid fingerprinting of bacterial proteins using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry or, for high-throughput sequencing of peptides from protease-digested cellular proteins, using mass analysis of fragments from collision-induced dissociation of peptide ions. The latter technique uses database searching of product ion mass spectra. A database contains a comprehensive list of protein sequences translated from protein-encoding open reading frames found in bacterial genomes. The results of such searches allow the assignment of experimental peptide sequences to matching theoretical bacterial proteomes. Phylogenetic profiles of sequenced peptides are then used to create a matrix of sequence-to-bacterium assignments, which are analyzed using numerical taxonomy tools. The results thereof reveal the relatedness between bacteria, and allow the taxonomic position of an investigated strain to be inferred.