Prolactin and LH release in response to LH-RH and TRH in ewes during dioestrus, pregnancy and post partum

With advancing pregnancy in the ewe there was a marked decline in plasma LH concentrations and pituitary LH-RH responsiveness (integrated LH release) and a marked increase in plasma prolactin values and pituitary TRH responsiveness (integrated prolactin release). In lactating ewes plasma LH levels and pituitary LH-RH responsiveness had returned to values found in the luteal phase of the normal cycle by 21 days post partum, whereas at 42 days post partum prolactin levels were still high. No interaction between TRH and LH-RH on prolactin and LH release in dioestrous ewes was detected. In non-pregnant ewes plasma prolactin levels were significantly higher in June than in January but TRH responsiveness was similar. It is concluded that, in sheep, pituitary LH secretion recovers more rapidly from the chronic negative feedback effect of oestrogens and progesterone in pregnancy than prolactin secretion recovers from the chronic positive feedback effects of oestrogens. This finding may be a contributory factor in the resistance to resumption of breeding activity.     

Genetic and environmental variation in the LH response of ovariectomized sheep to LH-RH.

The influence of breed and season on the sensitivity of the pituitary gland of sheep to LH-RH was assessed. Ovariectomized ewes of 3 breeds (Finnish Landrace, Scottish Blackface and Tasmanian Merino) with differing normal breeding seasons and with differing ovulation rates were injected (i.v.) with 3 doses of LH-RH (1.56, 6.25 or 25.0 micrograms) at 3 different times of the year covering the anoestrous and the breeding seasons of intact ewes; 9 ewes of each breed (3 per sub-class) were examined on the first and third occasions, 6 (2 per sub-class) on the second. The response was measured in terms of the concentration of LH in peripheral plasma 20, 40, 60 and 80 min after injection. Time of year, but not the breed of sheep, affected the magnitude of the response; the data indicated that the duration of LH secretion was greater during the breeding season than during anoestrus. It was concluded that changes in the spontaneous activity of the hypothalamus/hypophysis could contribute to seasonal changes in LH secretion independently of the modifying effects of gonadal steroids. Such variation in unmodulated activity apparently does not contribute to the differences in ovulation rate among the 3 breeds.     

Age-related changes in the secretory pattern of FSH and LH in response to LH-RH in prepubertal female rats

Developmental changes in the pituitary responsiveness and the secretory pattern of FSH and LH in response to a single injection of LH-RH (100 ng/rat, s.c.) as estimated by increases in plasma concentrations of FSH and LH 10, 30 and 60 min after the injection were studied in female rats at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 days of age. The pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH for both FSH and LH release increased from 5 to 15 days of age, reached a maximum on 15 days of age and declined thereafter, whereas a marked increase in the amount of these hormones in the pituitary occurred between 15 and 20 days of age. An apparent change in the secretory pattern of both FSH and LH was observed from 20 days of age onward. In groups up to 15 days of age, plasma concentrations of FSH and LH remained elevated 60 min after the injection of LH-RH, though the plasma concentration of these hormones returned to preinjection concentrations in groups at 20 days of age or later. These results indicate that the age-related changes in the secretory pattern of LH and FSH in response to LH-RH as well as changes in the pituitary responsiveness were apparent during the prepubertal period.     

Pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH and TRH and the effects of progesterone or progesterone and oestradiol treatment in anoestrous sheep.

Pituitary responsiveness to 200 microgram synthetic LH-RH and to 10 microgram TRH was determined in anoestrous sheep before and after treatment for 3 weeks with progesterone (100 mg/day), or oestradiol (250 microgram/day) plus progesterone (100 mg/day). There was a marked decrease in pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH after progesterone (P is less than 0.01), or oestradiol plus progesterone (P is less than 0.01) treatments, and an increase in response to TRH after oestradiol plus progesterone (P is less than 0.01) treatment. The results demonstrate selective and simultaneous feedback effects of oestradiol and progesterone on pituitary responsiveness to two hypothalamic releasing hormones.     

Prolactin and LH release in response to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) administration in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was injected intravenously at a dose of 10 micrograms in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. In order to evaluate the hemodynamic and hormonal effects of this peptide, the mean arterial pressure, heart rate as well as a serum rLH and rPRL levels, the contents of LH-RH in hypothalamus and the content of LH in pituitary tissue were determined. The same procedure was applied in rats receiving placebo. Serum rPRL concentration was measured additionally after combined administration of VIP+dopamine. VIP injection produced a decrease in mean arterial pressure and an increase in heart rate in both spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. Serum rPRL concentration was significantly increased at 10 minutes after injection. The combined therapy (VIP+dopamine) partially inhibited this response. Serum rLH concentration, the content of LH-RH in hypothalamic tissue as well as the content of pituitary LH after VIP injection in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats did not differ from the values obtained for the control group. Conclusions: 1. VIP injection produced the dramatic hypotensive effects in hypertensive rats; 2. A marked increase in PRL concentration in response to VIP was partially inhibited by dopamine in hypertensive and normotensive rats; 3. VIP injection did not change LH-RH and LH release in both hypertensive and normotensive rats.     

Feedback control of FSH secretion in the male rat

Site of feedback control of FSH secretion in the male rat was studied by measuring changes in serum LH, FSH and hypothalamic LH-RH by radioimmunoassay in rats after castration and after 500 rad X-irradiation to the testis. The rise in serum LH and FSH in castrated animals was associated with a significant fall in hypothalamic LH-RH 16 and 24 days after castration. Serum FSH rose significantly after X-irradiation without a significant change in serum LH or hypothalamic LH-RH content up to 30 days after irradiation. When pituitary halves from X-irradiated animals were incubated in vitro in the presence or absence of synthetic LH-RH, there was a significant rise in FSH (but not LH) released in the incubation medium in the absence of added LH-RH. The response of the pituitaries to LH-RH was, however, not different between control and irradiated rats. It is concluded that the testicular FSH-inhibitory substance acts predominantly at the pituitary gland on the LH-RH independent release of FSH.     

Ultrastructure of rat pituitary LH gonadotrophs in relation to serum and pituitary LH levels following repeated LH-RH stimulation

The effects of single and repeated LH-RH injections at 120 min intervals on female rat LH gonadotrophs and on pituitary and serum LH levels were investigated using electronmicroscopy and radioimmunoassay. A temporary stimulation of granule release, of protein and new granule synthesis and of the accumulation of lysosomal structures was found in LH cells after the first LH-RH injection. The temporary stimulations were massively enhanced after the second injection. These consecutive yet in their time-sequence overlapping processes account for the initial depletion of secretory granule content (3--15 min after LH-RH injection), for the subsequent regranulation and accumulation of granules above control levels (60--120 min after injection) and also for the reduction in the number of granules to control levels (150 min after LH-RH injection and thereafter). Increased polymorphic lysosomal structures are believed to be responsible for this reduction of excess granules. The amount of assayable pituitary and serum LH generally corresponds with the morphological changes observed in LH-gonadotrophs, thus further substantiating the above observations. A schema which summarizes the observed morphological and hormonal changes in their time-sequence in response to LH-RH stimulation depicts the short-term regulation of secretory processes in female gonadotrophs.     

Pituitary and ovarian responses to luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone during pregnancy and after parturition in brown hares (Lepus europaeus)

Female hares were given an i.v. injection of 5 micrograms luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) between Days 7 and 19 (n = 21), 20 and 33 (n = 17) and 34 and 41 (n = 17) of pregnancy, and in the 3 days after parturition (n = 16). Whatever the stage of pregnancy, the LHRH injection induced a release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and an acute secretion of progesterone; these hormonal responses increased significantly during pregnancy, to reach values similar to those observed in nonpregnant, nonpseudopregnant females during the breeding season in the 3 days after parturition. However, the release of LH remained monophasic in pregnant and post-partum females, in contrast to the unmated females during the reproductive season, in which there was a biphasic profile. The proportion of ovulating females after LHRH treatment was approximately 60% at the beginning and end of pregnancy; and, after parturition, fell to 23% between Days 20 and 33. After Day 33, the pituitary response to LHRH was significantly higher in ovulating than in nonovulating females. At the beginning of pregnancy, 67% of females aborted after LHRH injection; after Day 20, the incidence of abortion decreased significantly and was 0% from Day 34. The amplitude and duration of progesterone secretion by the new corpora lutea resulting from ovulation after LHRH injection were similar to those of corpora lutea induced in nonpregnant females during the breeding season.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Site of negative feedback action of estrogen on gonadotropin secretion in normal women

We have reported that iv administration of conjugated estrogens results in no significant change in the plasma LH-RH level during the negative feedback phase of LH, suggesting that estrogen does not suppress LH by decreasing hypothalamic LH-RH. To determine the site of estrogen action during the negative feedback phase, we studied the pituitary response to a small amount of LH-RH after estrogen administration in normal cyclic women in the mid-follicular phase. The pituitary responses to an iv bolus of 2.5 micrograms of synthetic LH-RH were evaluated by measuring serum LH and FSH 2 h before and 8 h after administration of 20 mg of conjugated estrogens (Premarin). The mean levels of serum LH and FSH were significantly (p less than 0.05) decreased 8 h after the injection. The peak responses of LH and FSH to LH-RH were also significantly (p less than 0.05) reduced after Premarin administration. These findings suggest that the negative feedback effect of estrogen on gonadotropin secretion is caused by its direct suppression on the pituitary response to LH-RH.     

Response of lutropin (LH) and follitropin (FSH) to the administration of gonadoliberin (GnRH) in pregnant and post-partum cattle including experiments with prolactin suppression

GnRH (250 μg) was administered intravenously in a total of 121 experiments carried out on 21 cows during the period from 180 days ante (ap) to 50 days post partum (pp). Additionally in one group of animals prolactin secretion was inhibited after parturition by means of 3 intramuscular injections of 150 mg Bromocryptine (CB-154) on days 1, 4 and 7 pp. LH response (peak height, area under the dose response curve) was about the same from 150 to 60 days ap, then decreased significantly towards parturition and was lowest during the first 6 days post partum. At a later time the Lh response was more pronounced than during pregnancy. The FSH response decreased significantly during the last 9 days ap, remained low during the frist 6 days pp and increased thereafter. There was no significant influence of prolactin inhibition on LH and FSH values (except for the total FSH released on day 50 pp). Whereas in all GnRH treated animals pronounced pituitary gonadotropin responsiveness was measurable (except during the period around parturition), the variation of the LH response pp was much higher than ap. The LH results gave some indication of the wide range of response pattern for this hormone after parturition which might be one reason for the individuality in the initiation of a new estrous cycle post partum in cattle.     

Response of adult male rats to LH-RH after neonatal immunization with antiserum to LH-RH

Male rats were passively immunized at Day 5 of age with LH-RH antiserum. Their response to LH-RH at 100 days of age was examined. Serum FSH and LH concentrations increased more than in control rats, although basal plasma levels were similar. The pituitary content of LH, but not FSH, was significantly increased, and hypothalamic content of LH-RH was similar in both groups. The testes and seminal vesicles were smaller in experimental animals than in controls. It is suggested that transient blockade of LH-RH secretion during the neonatal period produces abnormalities in pituitary-testicular functon in the adult rat.     

Early pituitary follicle stimulating hormone response to gonadotrophin releasing hormone in ewes

The object of our experiments was to characterize the response of plasma follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) within minutes of an i.v. injection of high or low doses of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH), especially in relation to contemporary changes in luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. In the deep anoestrous period (June), three intact ewes and two ovariectomized ewes were injected with 1 mug synthetic GnRH followed 2 h later by a second identical injection. A week later, the same regimen was repeated with the same sheep but with 50 mug GnRH after an interval of 5 h 20 min. Blood samples were collected every 15 sec for 15 min after each injection (early release), then at longer intervals (main release) till the next treatment, followed by sampling for a further 6-h period after the second treatment. FSH was released as soon as the second minute after GnRH injection in all ewes. The mean pituitary FSH response, during this early release, in intact and ovariectomized ewes was similar after either 1 or 50 mug GnRH. However, the main release was less pronounced in the ovariectomized sheep and was not stimulated after the second treatment in all sheep. Three other ewes were injected with 40 mug GnRH and sampled every 15 sec for seven, 6-min periods during the period of release to compare FSH and LH secretion. The profiles reflected a similarity in sensitivity and responsiveness to GnRH, especially soon after GnRH injection. Increases in both hormones were formed by several grouped associated spikes. It is suggested that a readily releasable pool of FSH exists in the ewe. There are probably differences in the mechanisms of synthesis and/or release between pituitary FSH and LH.     

Inhibitory control of the pituitary LH secretion by LH-RH in male rats.

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) was administered to prepubertal male rats (intact, castrate or castrate-adrenalectomized, 60 g body weight) for 28 days (1 microgram LH-RH/day, s.c.), at a 10-fold physiological dose, as compared to the minimal FSH-releasing dose of 100 ng/rat s.c. In intact rats, serum LH and weight of androgen-dependent organs (vented prostate, seminal vesicles) were reduced after 14 days of treatment. In castrate rats, the postcastration rise in serum LH was abolished by treatment. Pituitary LH content, FSH secretion and prolactin secretion were not suppressed. Hypothalamic LH-RH was increased at 14 and 21 days. In castrate adrenalectomized male rats, LH secretion was also suppressed by 1 microgram LH-RH s.c. x 28 days. The hypothalamic LH-RH content did not increase. The pituitary LH-RH receptor level was not down-regulated after 14 days treatment either in intact or castrate male rats. Pituitary inhibition (LH release) in rats by a supraphysiological dose of LH-RH given for 28 days indicates that the optimal regime for chronic treatment has to be determined by monitoring LH release at regular intervals. Direct pituitary inhibition by LH-RH may explain some of the unexpected antifertility effects observed with high doses of LH-RH.     

Comparison of LH release and luteal function in cyclic and LH-RH-treated anoestrous ewes pretreated with PMSG or oestrogen.

Pretreatment of seasonally anoestrous Clun Forest ewes with 750 i.u. PMSG or 50 microgram oestradiol benzoate 24 or 7 h respectively before a single injection of 150 microgram synthetic LH-RH significantly increased the release of LH compared to that after injection of 150 microgram LH-RH alone. Total LH release in the two "combined" treatments was approximately 70% of that found at a natural oestrus, compared to 25% for LH-RH alone. All but one of the treated ewes ovulated, but only those pretreated with PMSG consistently produced corpora lutea capable of elevating peripheral plasma progesterone concentrations although these were lower than those at natural mid-cycle. These progesterone concentrations were, however, comparable to those during the natural cycle when corrected for the higher metabolic clearance rate found during anoestrus.     

Effect of LH-RH on the release of sulfated lutropin: a potential in vitro bioassay for LH-RH

Sheep pituitary cells prelabelled with radioactive [35S] sulfate (35SO4(2-)) were incubated with different concentrations of LH-RH and the release of LH (lutropin) into the medium was monitored in terms of immunoprecipitable [35S] sulfated LH radioactivity and estimation of LH in the same sample by radioimmunoassay. A dose dependent response was obtained with a maximum of a 16 fold increase in immunoprecipitable 35SO4(2-) -labelled LH radioactivity in the medium which was confirmed by radioimmunoassay. Similar results were also obtained for Buserelin, a well known superactive analogue of LH-RH. However, the half maximal response for Buserelin was obtained at 3-5 nM in comparison to 80.5 nM for LH-RH. After the maximal response to LH-RH as well as Buserelin, a further increase in the concentrations caused a decrease in the release of immunoprecipitable [35S]-sulfate labelled LH into the medium. Differential labelling of stored and newly synthesized LH with radioactive [35S] sulfate and [3H]-labelled leucine revealed that there was a dose dependent increase in the [35S] sulfate labelled LH into the medium whereas the release of [3H]-leucine labelled newly synthesized LH did not show a parallel increase either at different concentrations of LH-RH or at different time intervals. The above observations strongly suggest the possibility of sulfation of LH being the potential signal indicating the storage of LH in sheep pituitary cells. Another important observation in our study was that the dose dependent response of LH-RH in the form of release of [35S]-sulfate labelled LH, which was monitored by immunoprecipitation with specific LH antiserum, can be used in an in vitro bioassay for LH-RH. We believe that a new cheap and sensitive in vitro bioassay could be developed on the basis of this observation.     

Comparison between the biological effects of LH-RH and buserelin on the induction of LH release from hemi-pituitary glands of female rats in vitro

The biological effects of LH-RH and the agonist [D-Ser(But)6-des Gly10]-LH-RH(1-9)-ethylamide (buserelin) were compared during 8 h of incubation with female rat hemi-pituitary glands. Similar dose-response relationships were found for LH-RH and buserelin as concerns the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) by pituitary glands from intact and ovariectomized rats. Also the LH secretion patterns from glands of intact rats were similar: an initial low response was followed by a fast increase (priming effect) after which the response declined again (desensitization). In a subsequent experiment pituitary glands from ovariectomized rats were first exposed to LH-RH or buserelin for 4 h and then further incubated in medium only. After discontinuation of the stimuli the rate of LH release decreased in all cases, but this decrease was significantly greater when the glands had been exposed to LH-RH. Short-term (1/2, 1 or 2 h) exposures to LH-RH or buserelin followed by an intervening period (1 1/2, 1 or 0 h, respectively) of incubation in medium only resulted in an almost similar, significant increase in the subsequent protein synthesis-independent LH response to LH-RH (priming effect). Only preincubation with LH-RH for 2 h was significantly more effective. The results demonstrate equal intrinsic activities for LH-RH and buserelin. Differences in the biopotencies for LH-RH and buserelin in vivo and in vitro may occur only after discontinuation of the external stimuli.     

Role of luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (LH-RF) and LH on maintenance of early gestation in rats.

The role of luteinizing hormone (LH) and LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH) in the maintenance of early pregnancy in rats was studied. Serum levels of progesterone (P) and LH were measured daily in untreated pregnant rats from Day 4 through parturition. Serum levels of P and LH were determined on Days 11 and 15 of pregnancy in animals treated with antisera to LH (LH-A/S) and to LH-RH (LH-RH-A/S) on Days 8-10. Serum levels of P peaked on Days 7 and 16 in untreated animals, after which they declined sharply just before delivery. Serum LH fluctuated between 30-160 ng/ml during pregnancy but did not exhibit any distinctive peaks. Treatment with .2 ml LH-A/S on Days 8-10 reduced serum P to virtually undetectable levels on Day 11, and only a slight recovery was evident on Day 15. Lower doses of LH-A/S had no effect. Administration of 1.3 ml LH-RH-A/S had no effect on serum levels of P or LH, and did not impede fetal development. The results indicate that LH is essential to the luteotropic complex of early pregnancy in the rat, and also that LH-RH-A/S can maintain to some extent basal levels of P and LH during early pregnancy.     

Exogenous GnRH induces ovulation in seasonally anoestrous lactating goats (Capra hircus)

A specific sheep LH radioimmunoassay was validated for the measurement of goat LH, and used to monitor luteal-phase LH episodes and the preavulatory LH surge in progestagen sponge-synchronized cycling goats. No luteal-phase LH episodes were detected during 12 h of frequent (15-min) blood sampling in 2 goats. A preovulatory LH surge was recorded in 5/5 goats, with a mean amplitude of 45.4 +/- 7.2 ng/ml and a mean time of onset of 38.4 +/- 1.2 h after removal of a progestagen-impregnated sponge. In anoestrous goats, single i.v. injections of 1000 and 2000 ng GnRH induced LH episodes with a mean amplitude of 2.04 +/- 0.11 and 3.67 +/- 0.06 ng/ml respectively, but injections of 250 or 500 ng did not consistently elevate LH concentrations. Progestagen-primed, seasonally anoestrous lactating goats were treated with repeated injections of 1500 ng GnRH (every 2 h for 52 or 78 h) in May 1985 or 1986. All 10 had kidded in March of the same year, and were consequently at peak lactation at the time of GnRH treatment. A preovulatory LH surge was detected in 9 goats with a mean time of onset of 59.5 +/- 2.9 h (1985) or 39.6 +/- 3.3 h (1986) after vaginal sponge removal. All animals displayed oestrus and ovulated, and 9 of the goats were mated: in 5 of these animals pregnancies were successfully carried to term. The results show episodic LH release in response to GnRH and indicate that ovulation can be induced in seasonally anoestrous goats, even at peak lactation, and normal pregnancies may result.     

Age-dependent changes in the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis of the laying hen.

The functional integrity of the components of the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis was examined in young and old laying hens. Ovarian function was tested by measuring the amount of progesterone released in response to an injection of LH, and pituitary function was investigated by measuring the increase in the plasma LH level after an injection of LH-RH. There were no differences between young and old birds in the response of the pituitary gland or the ovary to these stimuli. Hypothalamic function was investigated by studying the positive feedback action of a standard dose of progesterone on LH release; the positive feedback response was smaller (P less than 0.05) in old hens. It is suggested that the fall in the rate of lay in hens towards the end of their laying year is caused partly by a decrease in the response of the LH-positive feedback mechanism to progesterone.     

Plasma LH concentrations after single or double injections of synthetic LH-RH in dairy cows.

Milked Friesian dairy cows were given 1 or 2 i.v. injections of synthetic LH-RH. The second of 2 injections of LH-RH given 1.5 h apart induced a significantly greater release of LH than did the first. The response to this injection was also significantly greater than that caused by injections given 6 h apart. There was no significant difference between the LH responses to the two injections given 6 h apart. The total LH release produced by the two injections of 100 microgram synthetic LH-RH given 1.5 h apart was significantly greater than that produced by single injection of 200 microgram synthetic LH-RH. It is concluded that there is a short-term increase in the responsiveness of the bovine pituitary gland to LH-RH after an initial LH-RH stimulus.