The biology of intron gain and loss

Intron density in eukaryote genomes varies by more than three orders of magnitude, so there must have been extensive intron gain and/or intron loss during evolution. A favored and partial explanation for this range of intron densities has been that introns have accumulated stochastically in large eukaryote genomes during their evolution from an intron-poor ancestor. However, recent studies have shown that some eukaryotes lost many introns, whereas others accumulated and/or gained many introns. In this article, we discuss the growing evidence that these differences are subject to selection acting on introns depending on the biology of the organism and the gene involved.     

Complex Evolutionary Patterns of tRNAUAALeu Group I Introns in Cyanobacterial Radiation

Based on the findings that plastids and cyanobacteria have similar group I introns inserted into tRNAUAALeu genes, these introns have been suggested to be immobile and of ancient origin. In contrast, recent evidence suggests lateral transfer of cyanobacterial group I introns located in tRNAUAALeu genes. In light of these new findings, we have readdressed the evolution and lateral transfer of tRNAUAALeu group I introns in cyanobacteral radiation. We determined the presence of introns in 38 different strains, representing the major cyanobacterial lineages, and characterized the introns in 22 of the strains. Notably, two of these strains have two tRNAUAALeu genes, with each of these genes interrupted by introns, while three of the strains have both interrupted and uninterrupted genes. Two evolutionary distinct clusters of tRNA genes, with the genes interrupted by introns belonging to two distinct intron clusters, were identified. We also compared 16S rDNA and intron evolution for both closely and distantly related strains. The distribution of the introns in the clustered groups, as defined from 16S rDNA analysis, indicates relatively recent gain and/or loss of the introns in some of these lineages. The comparative analysis also suggests differences in the phylogenetic trees for 16S rDNA and the tRNAUAALeu group I introns. Taken together, our results show that the evolution of the intron is considerably more complex than previous studies found to be the case. We discuss, based on our results, evolutionary models involving lateral intron transfer and models involving differential loss of the intron.     

The rise and falls of introns

There has been a lively debate over the evolution of eukaryote introns: at what point in the tree of life did they appear and from where, and what has been their subsequent pattern of loss and gain? A diverse range of recent research papers is relevant to this debate, and it is timely to bring them together. The absence of introns that are not self-splicing in prokaryotes and several other lines of evidence suggest an ancient eukaryotic origin for these introns, and the subsequent gain and loss of introns appears to be an ongoing process in many organisms. Some introns are now functionally important and there have been suggestions that invoke natural selection for the ancient and recent gain of introns, but it is also possible that fixation and loss of introns can occur in the absence of positive selection.     

Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns

ABSTRACT: Evolution of exon-intron structure of eukaryotic genes has been a matter of long-standing, intensive debate. The introns-early concept, later rebranded 'introns first' held that protein-coding genes were interrupted by numerous introns even at the earliest stages of life's evolution and that introns played a major role in the origin of proteins by facilitating recombination of sequences coding for small protein/peptide modules. The introns-late concept held that introns emerged only in eukaryotes and new introns have been accumulating continuously throughout eukaryotic evolution. Analysis of orthologous genes from completely sequenced eukaryotic genomes revealed numerous shared intron positions in orthologous genes from animals and plants and even between animals, plants and protists, suggesting that many ancestral introns have persisted since the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA). Reconstructions of intron gain and loss using the growing collection of genomes of diverse eukaryotes and increasingly advanced probabilistic models convincingly show that the LECA and the ancestors of each eukaryotic supergroup had intron-rich genes, with intron densities comparable to those in the most intron-rich modern genomes such as those of vertebrates. The subsequent evolution in most lineages of eukaryotes involved primarily loss of introns, with only a few episodes of substantial intron gain that might have accompanied major evolutionary innovations such as the origin of metazoa. The original invasion of self-splicing Group II introns, presumably originating from the mitochondrial endosymbiont, into the genome of the emerging eukaryote might have been a key factor of eukaryogenesis that in particular triggered the origin of endomembranes and the nucleus. Conversely, splicing errors gave rise to alternative splicing, a major contribution to the biological complexity of multicellular eukaryotes. There is no indication that any prokaryote has ever possessed a spliceosome or introns in protein-coding genes, other than relatively rare mobile self-splicing introns. Thus, the introns-first scenario is not supported by any evidence but exon-intron structure of protein-coding genes appears to have evolved concomitantly with the eukaryotic cell, and introns were a major factor of evolution throughout the history of eukaryotes. This article was reviewed by I. King Jordan, Manuel Irimia (nominated by Anthony Poole), Tobias Mourier (nominated by Anthony Poole), and Fyodor Kondrashov. For the complete reports, see the Reviewers' Reports section.     

Evidence that introns arose at proto-splice sites.

The unexpected discovery of introns raised many questions about gene evolution. We provide evidence that actin and tubulin introns were gained between the G and R of the conserved coding sequence C/AAGR that is known to flank introns in general and which we call a proto-splice site. We conclude that the tubulin and actin introns are less ancient than the coding sequence and so could not have been involved in the primary evolution of the tubulin and actin genes.     

The origin of introns and their role in eukaryogenesis: a compromise solution to the introns-early versus introns-late debate?

Background  

Ever since the discovery of 'genes in pieces' and mRNA splicing in eukaryotes, origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns have been considered within the conceptual framework of the 'introns early' versus 'introns late' debate. The 'introns early' hypothesis, which is closely linked to the so-called exon theory of gene evolution, posits that protein-coding genes were interrupted by numerous introns even at the earliest stages of life's evolution and that introns played a major role in the origin of proteins by facilitating recombination of sequences coding for small protein/peptide modules. Under this scenario, the absence of spliceosomal introns in prokaryotes is considered to be a result of "genome streamlining". The 'introns late' hypothesis counters that spliceosomal introns emerged only in eukaryotes, and moreover, have been inserted into protein-coding genes continuously throughout the evolution of eukaryotes. Beyond the formal dilemma, the more substantial side of this debate has to do with possible roles of introns in the evolution of eukaryotes.     

Exon junction sequences as cryptic splice sites: implications for intron origin

Introns are flanked by a partially conserved coding sequence that forms the immediate exon junction sequence following intron removal from pre-mRNA. Phylogenetic evidence indicates that these sequences have been targeted by numerous intron insertions during evolution, but little is known about this process. Here, we test the prediction that exon junction sequences were functional splice sites that existed in the coding sequence of genes prior to the insertion of introns. To do this, we experimentally identified nine cryptic splice sites within the coding sequence of actin genes from humans, Arabidopsis, and Physarum by inactivating their normal intron splice sites. We found that seven of these cryptic splice sites correspond exactly to the positions of exon junctions in actin genes from other species. Because actin genes are highly conserved, we could conclude that at least seven actin introns are flanked by cryptic splice sites, and from the phylogenetic evidence, we could also conclude that actin introns were inserted into these cryptic splice sites during evolution. Furthermore, our results indicate that these insertion events were dependent upon the splicing machinery. Because most introns are flanked by similar sequences, our results are likely to be of general relevance.     

Evolution of seed storage protein genes: Legumin genes of Ginkgo biloba

Legumin-like seed storage proteins have been intensively studied in crop plants. However, little is known about the molecular evolution of these proteins and their genes and it was assumed that they originated from an ancestral gene that already existed at the beginning of angiosperm evolution. We have evidence for the ubiquitous occurrence of homologous proteins in gymnosperms as well. We have characterized the major seed storage globulin from Ginkgo biloba by amino acid sequencing, which reveals clear homology to legumin-like proteins from angiosperms. The Ginkgo legumin is encoded by a gene family; we describe two of its members. The promoter regions contain sequence motifs which are known to function as regulatory elements involved in seed-specific expression of angiosperm legumins, although the tissues concerned are different in gymnosperms and angiosperms. The Ginkgo legumin gene structure is divergent from that of angiosperms and suggests that the evolution of legumin genes implicated loss of introns. From our data and from functional approaches recently described it becomes obvious that the posttranslational processing site of legumin precursors is less conserved than hitherto assumed. Finally, we present a phylogenetic analysis of legumin encoding sequences and discuss their utility as molecular markers for the reconstruction of seed plant evolution.Correspondence to: K.-P. Häger     

A very high fraction of unique intron positions in the intron-rich diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana indicates widespread intron gain

Although spliceosomal introns are present in all characterized eukaryotes, intron numbers vary dramatically, from only a handful in the entire genomes of some species to nearly 10 introns per gene on average in vertebrates. For all previously studied intron-rich species, significant fractions of intron positions are shared with other widely diverged eukaryotes, indicating that 1) large numbers of the introns date to much earlier stages of eukaryotic evolution and 2) these lineages have not passed through a very intron-poor stage since early eukaryotic evolution. By the same token, among species that have lost nearly all of their ancestral introns, no species is known to harbor large numbers of more recently gained introns. These observations are consistent with the notion that intron-dense genomes have arisen only once over the course of eukaryotic evolution. Here, we report an exception to this pattern, in the intron-rich diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Only 8.1% of studied T. pseudonana intron positions are conserved with any of a variety of divergent eukaryotic species. This implies that T. pseudonana has both 1) lost nearly all of the numerous introns present in the diatom-apicomplexan ancestor and 2) gained a large number of new introns since that time. In addition, that so few apparently inserted T. pseudonana introns match the positions of introns in other species implies that insertion of multiple introns into homologous genic sites in eukaryotic evolution is less common than previously estimated. These results suggest the possibility that intron-rich genomes may have arisen multiple times in evolution. These results also provide evidence that multiple intron insertion into the same site is rare, further supporting the notion that early eukaryotic ancestors were very intron rich.     

Remarkable interkingdom conservation of intron positions and massive,lineage-specific intron loss and gain in eukaryotic evolution

Sequencing of eukaryotic genomes allows one to address major evolutionary problems, such as the evolution of gene structure. We compared the intron positions in 684 orthologous gene sets from 8 complete genomes of animals, plants, fungi, and protists and constructed parsimonious scenarios of evolution of the exon-intron structure for the respective genes. Approximately one-third of the introns in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum are shared with at least one crown group eukaryote; this number indicates that these introns have been conserved through >1.5 billion years of evolution that separate Plasmodium from the crown group. Paradoxically, humans share many more introns with the plant Arabidopsis thaliana than with the fly or nematode. The inferred evolutionary scenario holds that the common ancestor of Plasmodium and the crown group and, especially, the common ancestor of animals, plants, and fungi had numerous introns. Most of these ancestral introns, which are retained in the genomes of vertebrates and plants, have been lost in fungi, nematodes, arthropods, and probably Plasmodium. In addition, numerous introns have been inserted into vertebrate and plant genes, whereas, in other lineages, intron gain was much less prominent.     

Intervening sequences in paralogous genes: a comparative genomic approach to study the evolution of X chromosome introns

The enlargement of the genome size and the decrease in genome compactness with increase in the number and size of introns is a general pattern during the evolution of eukaryotes. Among the possible mechanisms for modifying intron size, it has been suggested that the insertion of transposable elements might have an important role in driving intron evolution. The analysis of large portions of the human genome demonstrated that a relatively recent (50 to 100 MYA) accumulation of transposable elements appears to be biased, favoring a preferential insertion of LINE1 transposons into sex chromosomes rather than into autosomes. In the present work, the effect of chromosomal location on the increase in size of introns was evaluated with a comparative analysis performed on pairs of human paralogous genes, one located on the X chromosome and the second on an autosome. A phylogenetic analysis was also performed on the X-encoded proteins and their paralogs to confirm orthology-paralogy and to approximately estimate the time of gene duplication. Statistical analysis of total intron length for each pair of paralogous genes provided no evidence for a larger size of introns in the gene copies located on the X chromosome. On the opposite, introns of autosomal genes were found to be significantly longer than introns of their X-linked paralogs. Likewise, LINE1 elements were not significantly more frequent in X-chromosome introns, whereas the frequency of SINE elements showed a marginally significant bias toward autosomal introns.     

Presequence Acquisition During Secondary Endocytobiosis and thePossible Role of Introns

Targeting of nucleus-encoded proteins into chloroplasts is mediated by N-terminal presequences. During evolution of plastids from formerly free-living cyanobacteria by endocytobiosis, genes for most plastid proteins have been transferred from the plastid genome to the nucleus and subsequently had to be equipped with such plastid targeting sequences. So far it is unclear how the gene domains coding for presequences and the respective mature proteins may have been assembled. While land plant plastids are supposed to originate from a primary endocytobiosis event (a prokaryotic cyanobacterium was taken up by a eukaryotic cell), organisms with secondary plastids like diatoms experienced a second endocytobiosis step involving a eukaryotic alga taken up by a eukaryotic host cell. In this group of algae, apparently most genes encoding chloroplast proteins have been transferred a second time (from the nucleus of the endosymbiont to the nucleus of the secondary host) and thus must have been equipped with additional targeting signals. We have analyzed cDNAs and the respective genomic DNA fragments of seven plastid preproteins from the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. In all of these genes we found single spliceosomal introns, generally located within the region coding for the N-terminal plastid targeting sequences or shortly downstream of it. The positions of the introns can be related to the putative phylogenetic histories of the respective genes, indicating that the bipartite targeting sequences in these secondary algae might have evolved by recombination events via introns.The nucleotide sequences have been deposited at Genbank under accession numbers AY191862, AY191863, AY191864, AY191865, AY191866, AY191867, and AY191868.     

The evolution of spliceosomal introns: patterns, puzzles and progress

The origins and importance of spliceosomal introns comprise one of the longest-abiding mysteries of molecular evolution. Considerable debate remains over several aspects of the evolution of spliceosomal introns, including the timing of intron origin and proliferation, the mechanisms by which introns are lost and gained, and the forces that have shaped intron evolution. Recent important progress has been made in each of these areas. Patterns of intron-position correspondence between widely diverged eukaryotic species have provided insights into the origins of the vast differences in intron number between eukaryotic species, and studies of specific cases of intron loss and gain have led to progress in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms and the forces that control intron evolution.     

Concerted evolution of exons and introns in the MHC-linked tenascin-X gene of mammals.

Two modes of evolution of repeated domains in proteins have been described: (1) a conservative mode, whereby individual domains are conserved across gene duplication and speciation events, and (2) a concerted mode, whereby repeat domains become homogenized within a gene, presumably by intragenic partial duplication and/or gene conversion. The evolution of repeated EGF-like and fibronection-type-III-like (Fn-III) domains in the vertebrate extracellular matrix proteins tenascin-X (TNX) and tenascin-C (TNC) was studied by comparisons between human and mouse orthologs and between the paralogous TNC and TNX genes. The EGF-like repeats have largely been homogenized within each gene by concerted evolution since the duplication of the two genes but have been conserved since the divergence of rodents and primates. The Fn-III domains of TNC have likewise mainly evolved in a conservative fashion since the divergence of rodents and primates. In contrast, the Fn-III repeats of TNX fall into three distinct categories with regard to mode of evolution: (1) The three C-terminal repeats have been conserved since before duplication of the TNX and TNC genes. (2) Certain other repeats have been homogenized within each gene since gene duplication but have been conserved since the divergence of rodents and primates. (3) Still other repeats have evolved in a concerted fashion in rodent and primate lineages since their divergence. Remarkably, certain introns adjacent to the exons encoding these concertedly evolving Fn-III repeats have themselves evolved in a concerted fashion. This is the first known example of concerted evolution of repeated introns within a protein-coding gene.     

Smoke without fire: most reported cases of intron gain in nematodes instead reflect intron losses

Identification of recently gained spliceosomal introns would provide crucial evidence in the continuing debate concerning the age and evolutionary significance of introns. A previously published genomic analysis reported to have identified 122 introns that had been gained since the divergence of the nematodes Caenorhabidits elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae approximately 100 MYA. However, using newly available genomic sequence from additional Caenorhabditis species, we show that 74% (60/81) of the reported gains in C. elegans are present in a C. briggsae relative. This pattern indicates that these introns represent losses in C. briggsae, not gains in C. elegans. In addition, 61% (25/41) of the reported gains in C. briggsae are present in the more distant C. briggsae relative, in a pattern suggesting that additional reported gains in C. elegans and/or C. briggsae may in fact represent unrecognized losses. These results underscore the dominance of intron loss over intron gain in recent eukaryotic evolution, the pitfalls associated with parsimony in inferring intron gains, and the importance of genomic sequencing of clusters of closely related species for drawing accurate inferences about genome evolution.     

Signs of Ancient and Modern Exon-Shuffling Are Correlated to the Distribution of Ancient and Modern Domains Along Proteins

Exon-shuffling is an important mechanism accounting for the origin of many new proteins in eukaryotes. However, its role in the creation of proteins in the ancestor of prokaryotes and eukaryotes is still debatable. Excess of symmetric exons is thought to represent evidence for exon-shuffling since the exchange of exons flanked by introns of the same phase does not disrupt the reading frame of the host gene. In this report, we found that there is a significant correlation between symmetric units of shuffling and the age of protein domains. Ancient domains, present in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, are more frequently bounded by phase 0 introns and their distribution is biased towards the central part of proteins. Modern domains are more frequently bounded by phase 1 introns and are present predominantly at the ends of proteins. We propose a model in which shuffling of ancient domains mainly flanked by phase 0 introns was important in the ancestor of eukaryotes and prokaryotes, during the creation of the central part of proteins. Shuffling of modern domains, predominantly flanked by phase 1 introns, accounted for the origin of the extremities of proteins during eukaryotic evolution.     

Dogfish alpha-crystallin sequences. Comparison with small heat shock proteins and Schistosoma egg antigen

The amino acid sequences of the alpha-crystallin A and B chains of the dogfish, Squalus acanthias, have been determined. Comparison with alpha-crystallins from other species reveals that charged amino acid replacements have been strongly avoided in the evolution of this lens protein. The homology of alpha-crystallins with the small heat shock proteins is pronounced throughout the major part of the proteins, starting from the position of the first intron in the alpha-crystallin genes, but is also detectable in the amino-terminal sequences of human, Xenopus, and Drosophila small heat shock proteins. In addition, a remarkable short sequence similarity is present only in the amino termini of dogfish alpha B and Drosophila HSP22. The Schistosoma egg antigen p40 turns out to have a tandemly repeated region of homology with the common sequence domain of alpha-crystallins and small heat shock proteins. Comparison of hydropathy profiles indicates the conservation of conformation of the common domains in these three families of proteins. Construction of phylogenetic trees suggests that the alpha A and alpha B genes apparently originated from a single ancestral small heat shock protein gene and indicates that introns have been lost during the evolution of the heat shock protein genes.     

CFM1, a member of the CRM-domain protein family,functions in chloroplast group II intron splicing in Setaria viridis

The chloroplast RNA splicing and ribosome maturation (CRM) domain is a RNA-binding domain found in a plant-specific protein family whose characterized members play essential roles in splicing group I and group II introns in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Together, these proteins are required for splicing of the majority of the approximately 20 chloroplast introns in land plants. Here, we provide evidence from Setaria viridis and maize that an uncharacterized member of this family, CRM Family Member1 (CFM1), promotes the splicing of most of the introns that had not previously been shown to require a CRM domain protein. A Setaria mutant expressing mutated CFM1 was strongly disrupted in the splicing of three chloroplast tRNAs: trnI, trnV and trnA. Analyses by RNA gel blot and polysome association suggest that the tRNA deficiencies lead to compromised chloroplast protein synthesis and the observed whole-plant chlorotic phenotypes. Co-immunoprecipitation data demonstrate that the maize CFM1 ortholog is bound to introns whose splicing is disrupted in the cfm1 mutant. With these results, CRM domain proteins have been shown to promote the splicing of all but two of the introns found in angiosperm chloroplast genomes.     

Domestication of self-splicing introns during eukaryogenesis: the rise of the complex spliceosomal machinery

?

The spliceosome is a eukaryote-specific complex that is essential for the removal of introns from pre-mRNA. It consists of five small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and over a hundred proteins, making it one of the most complex molecular machineries. Most of this complexity has emerged during eukaryogenesis, a period that is characterised by a drastic increase in cellular and genomic complexity. Although not fully resolved, recent findings have started to shed some light on how and why the spliceosome originated.In this paper we review how the spliceosome has evolved and discuss its origin and subsequent evolution in light of different general hypotheses on the evolution of complexity. Comparative analyses have established that the catalytic core of this ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex, as well as the spliceosomal introns, evolved from self-splicing group II introns. Most snRNAs evolved from intron fragments and the essential Prp8 protein originated from the protein that is encoded by group II introns. Proteins that functioned in other RNA processes were added to this core and extensive duplications of these proteins substantially increased the complexity of the spliceosome prior to the eukaryotic diversification. The splicing machinery became even more complex in animals and plants, yet was simplified in eukaryotes with streamlined genomes. Apparently, the spliceosome did not evolve its complexity gradually, but in rapid bursts, followed by stagnation or even simplification. We argue that although both adaptive and neutral evolution have been involved in the evolution of the spliceosome, especially the latter was responsible for the emergence of an enormously complex eukaryotic splicing machinery from simple self-splicing sequences.

Reviewers

This article was reviewed by W. Ford Doolittle, Eugene V. Koonin and Vivek Anantharaman.