Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the conventional Pap test and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in an ongoing multicenter trial testing optional screening tools (cytology, screening colposcopy, visual inspection with acetic acid, visual inspection with Lugol's Iodine, cervicography and Hybrid Capture II [HCII] (Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil) conventional and self-sampling), for cervical cancer in Brazil and Argentina. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 12,107 women attending four clinics (Campinas, S?o Paulo, Porto Alegre, Buenos Aires) were randomized into the 8 diagnostic arms. Women testing positive with any of the tests were referred for colposcopy, and cervical biopsies were used as the gold standard to assess performance characteristics of the diagnostic tests. Conventional Pap smears were sampled by all clinics (n = 10,240), and LBC (Autocyte PREP, [TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.], n=320, and DNA-Citoliq [Digene Brazil], n =1,346) was performed by 1 of the clinics. RESULTS: Conventional Pap smears showed no squamous intraepithelial lesions (normal) in 8,946 (87.4%) and LBC in 1,373 (82.4%). Using high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) as the cutoff, Pap smears predicted high grade (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 3) with OR 63.0 (95% CI, 36.90-107.70), standard error (SE) 59%, SP 97.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 68.1% and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.7%. The same figures for Autocyte PREP were: OR 9.0 (95% CI, 2.43-33.24), sensitivity (SE) 33.3%, specificity (SP) 100%, PPV 100% and negative PV (NPV) 88.8%. DNA-Citoliq detected CIN 3 as follows: OR 11.8 (95% CI 2.60-53.26), SE 40.0%, SP 94.6%, PPV 40.0% and NPV 94.6%. Lowering the cutoff to low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions increased SE and NPV but compromised SP and PPV. The detection rates for high grade lesions after an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance diagnosis were similar with the 3 techniques. In our settings, the 3 methods of cervical cytology were slightly different in performance. The conventional Pap smear had the highest SE, while Autocyte PREP had 100% SP and PPV in detecting CIN3 with the HSIL cutoff. All 3 tests had lower SE but higher SP as compared to HCII.     

A human papillomavirus testing system in women with abnormal Pap results: a comparison study with follow-up biopsies

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of INFORM HPV using the SurePath collection method in women whose Pap tests indicated abnormal results. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-two women from the gynecology clinics at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center who had Pap tests and underwent follow-up biopsies were selected for the study. This included 51 women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), 23 women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), 15 women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 3 women with negative Pap results. The INFORM HPV, an in situ hybridization assay, testing for oncogenic types of HPV was performed, and the results were compared with follow-up biopsies. RESULTS: The positive rate of the INFORM HPV increased with higher grades of cytology diagnoses. The sensitivity of the INFORM HPV testing for predicting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) also increased with higher grades of cytology diagnoses. A negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.9% and a specificity of 80.4% for predicting CIN 2/3 were observed in the ASCUS group. CONCLUSION: Using SurePath Pap specimens, the INFORM HPV lacks sufficient sensitivity and NPV for predicting CIN 2/3 in women with ASCUS. Therefore, use of the test as a triage tool is limited.     

Evaluation of p16INK4a in cervical lesion of premenopausal and postmenopausal women

Pap smears of postmenopausal women are often misdiagnosed because of the difficulty in distinguishing atrophic epithelial cells groups only by morphological criteria. In this study we investigated the diagnostic application of immunocytochemical staining of p16INK4a on conventional Pap smear. A total of 137 cervical specimens were enrolled in this study, of which 77 and 60 cervical smears were taken from premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively. Two cervical smears were taken simultaneously in 68 women, one for conventional cytology and the other for immunostaining. Additional 69 cervical smears were taken from the archive, decolorized and then used for immunostaining. In premenopausal women 1 out of 14 (7.1%) with negative cytology, 7 out of 24 (29.2%) with low grade squamous intra-epithelial lesion (LSIL), all 35 (100%) with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and all 4 (100%) with squamous cell carcinoma (confirmed by histopathology) had positive staining to p16INK4a. In postmenopausal women p16INK4a positivity was observed in 4 out of 7 (57.1%) cases of LSIL, 12 out of 14 (85.7%) cases of HSIL and all 4 out of 5 (80%) different cases of carcinoma (1 cervical adenosquamous carcinoma and 3 cervical squamous cell carcinoma in situ confirmed by histopathology), but none of 34 smears with normal cytology. Twenty smears with normal cytology chosen for the negative control in this study were from the group of postmenopausal women and were as expected negative for p16INK4a immunostaining. In the group of postmenopausal women, 16 out of 60 (26.7%) cases the cytological diagnosis was established on the basis of pl6lNK4a immunostaining as being HSIL. From our preliminary study on a limited number of samples, we can however conclude that pl6INK4a immunostaining is a very useful tool for cytological diagnosis enabling to distinguish HSIL from normal, reactive or inflammatory changes.     

Sensitivity of the Pap test in detecting high grade lesions: what should be the acceptable cytologic threshold for colposcopic referral?

OBJECTIVE: To devise an optimal cytology threshold for colposcopy referral in resource-limited settings. STUDY DESIGN: Four hundred seventy-two symptomatic women 20-60 years old were screened by both cytology and colposcopy. Onsite biopsy was taken if lesions grade 1 or above were detected on colposcopy. Women found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and above lesions on histopathology were stratified according to their cytologic diagnosis (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS]+ threshold, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL]+ threshold, and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]+ threshold). The comparative sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in each group were calculated, taking biopsy as the gold standard. RESULTS: The sensitivity of LSIL + cytology to detect CIN 2+ lesions was 91.5% (referral load, 30.7%). While the sensitivity of ASCUS+ cytology threshold was almost the same (92.3%), the referral load was much higher (42.2%). With HSIL+ cytology threshold, though the referral load was reduced substantially (21.9%), the sensitivity also decreased, to 81.5%. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that in order to achieve high sensitivity, the LSIL cytology threshold appears to be optimum for colposcopic referrals.     

Improved rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia detection in human papillomavirus DNA hybrid capture testing

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have established a link between human papillomavirus (HPV), squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and carcinoma of the cervix. Testing for HPV DNA in addition to cytology in screening programs for cervical cancer has been suggested to increase detection rates. STUDY DESIGN: HPV DNA testing (performed by hybridization antibody capture assay I or II), cytology and biopsy (performed within 1 month of each other) were retrospectively reviewed for a series of 155 women. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of HPV testing vs. cytology were calculated using biopsy as the gold standard. These values were also calculated in a subgroup of 37 individuals older than 35 years. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DNA hybrid capture HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) were 86%, 44%, 26% and 93%, respectively. The respective values for cytology detection of high-grade CIN were 17%, 97%, 56% and 82%. CONCLUSION: HPV testing was significantly more sensitive for detecting high-grade CIN than cytology (86% vs. 17%). Our data support immediate colposcopy and biopsy, rather than follow-up Papanicolaou testing, if the test for HPV DNA is positive for an intermediate- to high-risk type.     

Cervicovaginal smear abnormalities in sexually active adolescents. Implications for management

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and spectrum of Pap smear (PS) abnormalities in sexually active adolescents in comparison to adult women in order to determine whether management of adolescents should differ from that of adults. STUDY DESIGN: Five hundred twenty-four adolescents who had an initial PS at our institution from January to September 1997 were followed for 36 months with repeat PS and/or cervical biopsy. Initial PS results were compared with those of adult women. The chi 2 test was used to calculate the statistical significance of differences between the two groups. The qualified atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytologic diagnosis in adolescents was correlated with follow-up data. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) in adolescents was 29% as compared to 23% in adults. Almost all initial squamous lesions were ASCUS and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); only one case of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) was detected. On follow-up 18% and 2.4% of adolescents developed LSIL and HSIL, with a LSIL/HSIL ratio of 8/1 as compared to 5/1 in adults. The average time from initial PS to detection of HSIL was 20 months. All patients with HSIL except one had had one or more previous abnormal PSs. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for subsequent dysplasia for ASCUS favor reactive (ASCUS.R), ASCUS not otherwise specified (ASCUS.NOS) and ASCUS favor dysplasia (ASCUS.D) in adolescents were .13, .17 and .31, respectively. ASCUS.NOS (P = .01) and ASCUS.D (P = .007) were strong indicators of dysplasia as compared to ASCUS.R. CONCLUSION: PS abnormalities are more common in sexually active adolescents, with a significantly higher prevalence of LSIL over HSIL as compared to adult women. Given the natural history of HPV infection, we recommend follow-up with cytology rather than colposcopy/biopsy for adolescents with ASCUS and LSIL PSs. Qualification of ASCUS is useful in determining which adolescents are at the highest risk of cervical dysplasia.     

Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear

OBJECTIVE: To identify cytologic parameters on Pap smears of women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) diagnosis that could help cytologists to indicate whether a particular ASCUS case is most likely related to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 or 2/3. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 360 eligible women diagnosed with ASCUS and referred to the colposcopy clinic of Saint-Sacrement Hospital participated in the study. Eligible women were those aged 18-50 years, newly diagnosed with ASCUS, with no history of cervical biopsies or treatment, and not pregnant at the time of the visit. Colposcopically directed biopsies of lesions were obtained. All Pap smears were reviewed according to 36 different cytomorphologic criteria. The regression logistic model was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for the associations between cytologic criteria observed in smears and the diagnosis of CIN made on biopsies. All cytologic criteria significantly (P < .05) associated with CIN were entered in the models, and a backward selection was done to determine independent cytologic predictors of CIN 1 and 2/3. RESULTS: Biopsies revealed that 22.2% of the study population had concurrent CIN. CIN I and 2/3 were identified in 61 (16.9%) and 19 women (5.3%), respectively. Clear perinuclear spaces (OR = 2.5, P = .002) and moderate nuclear atypia (OR = 4.4, P = .02) were two cytologic criteria independently associated with CIN 1. Four independent predictors of CIN 2/3 were identified: the presence of clear perinuclear spaces (OR = 5.9, P = .004), hyperchromasia (OR = 3.9, P = .04), moderate anisokaryosis (OR = 13.1, P = .01 and increased nuclear volume of metaplastic cells (OR = 5.1, P = .007). CONCLUSION: These observations may help cytologists to better categorize ASCUS lesions as intraepithelial ones and will also contribute to improving the Bethesda definition of ASCUS. Further studies are planned to validate these observations.     

Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance pap smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3 in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) on Pap tests. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 752 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women (patients 45 years) with an ASCUS interpretation on ThinPrep Pap tests were identified in 2002 and 2003. High risk HPVDNA was detected in 191 (25.4%) women. The follow-up results in these 136 women were compared with those of women <45 years. RESULTS: Of the 136 perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, 64.7% became negative on cytology or biopsy and 30.9% revealed persistent low-grade SIL (LSIL)/CIN 1. Furthermore, 5 women (3.68%) were diagnosed with HSIL/CIN 2 or 3, and 1 patient had squamous cell carcinoma (0.74%). The rate of HSIL/CIN 2 or 3 or worse detected in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women was significant lower than 10.6% in women <45 years (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with high-risk HPV positivity and an ASCUS interpretation have a significantly lower risk of HSIL/CIN 2 or 3 detected. Nonetheless, the risk of a significant finding on workup, including invasive carcinoma, indicates the need for colposcopic evaluation of these women.     

The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia

Objective:  To determine the role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in the management of endocervical neoplasia.
Setting:  Colposcopy unit and cytology laboratory in a teaching hospital.
Sample:  Group 1 included 184 smears showing endocervical glandular neoplasia from 129 patients and group 2 included 101 patients with histology showing endocervical abnormalities in a 6-year period (1993–1998). Follow-up of 6–11 years to 2004 was available.
Methods:  Group 1 were identified from the cytology computer records. Group 2 were identified from histology records on the cytology database and a record of histology cases kept for audit purposes. The clinical records were examined retrospectively.
Results:  The positive predictive value (PPV) of abnormal endocervical cells in smears was 81.1% for significant glandular/squamous [cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade2 (CIN2 or worse)] lesions. The PPV of colposcopy was 93.5% for significant glandular/squamous lesions of the cervix. The postcolposcopy probability of a significant lesion when colposcopy was normal was 87.5%. The sensitivity of colposcopy in detecting endocervical lesions was 9.8%. The sensitivity of cervical smears in detecting a significant endocervical abnormality (CGIN or worse) was 66.3%. The false negative rate for cytology of endocervical glandular lesions was 4.0%.
Conclusions:  Endocervical glandular neoplasia detected on cytology is predictive of significant cervical pathology even when colposcopy is normal, which supports excisional biopsy in the primary assessment of these smears. The high concomitant squamous abnormality rate justifies the use of colposcopy to direct biopsies from the ectocervix. Cervical cytology is the only current screening method for cervical glandular abnormalities but sensitivity is poor.     

Diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy for squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions

The main objective of work was to determine a diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy as a method of screening and differential diagnosis, as well as to determine the relative value of some colposcopic features of squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions. Cytological diagnosis and colposcopy findings is compared with histological ones for 187 patients with intraepithelial lesions (142 squamous and 45 glandular ones with or without squamous components) and determined the sensitivity and positive predictive value of cytology and colposcopy, including the types of colposcopic abnormalities associated with squamous/glandular intraepithelial lesions. The sensitivity of cytology as a screening method for SIL (squamous intraepithelial lesions) is 89% and for GIL (glandular intraepithelial lesions) 98%. Positive predictive value of differential cytology for SIL is 59% and for GIL 53%. Sensitivity of colposcopy for both lesions' type is 87%. Acetowhite epithelium occurs for more often with SIL, whereas atypical vessels and unequal, dilated gland openings with GIL (p < 0.05). Cytology and colposcopy as screening methods have a high sensitivity. Nevertheless, cytology is far more accurate in determining differential diagnosis of SIL than GIL and some colposcopy abnormalities suspicious of GIL should be further tested in praxis.     

Outcomes of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and high-risk human papillomavirus DNA

OBJECTIVE: To study the risk of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3 in women with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytology over a 2-year period using the 2001 Bethesda System and ThinPrep Paps. STUDY DESIGN: In 2002, 846 patients with ThinPrep cervical cytology having an ASCUS interpretation and positive for high-risk HPV DNA were identified. A cohort of 514 (60.8%) patients with follow-up by repeat cytology, cervical biopsy or both was included in the study. Patient age was 12-81 years, with a median of 25 years. RESULTS: There were 291 women (56.6%) with negative status by cytology, HPV testing or biopsy with a median interval of 8.5 months, and an additional 174 patients (33.9%) had persistent ASCUS, positive HPV DNA or low-grade SIL/CIN 1. Finally, 49 patients (9.5%) had CIN 2 or 3, with a median interval of 8.5 months. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that HSIL or CIN 2 or 3 will be detected in 1 in 10 women with HPV-positive index ASCUS cervical cytology at initial colposcopy or within a 2-year follow-up period.     

CIN 2/3 and cervical cancer after an ASCUS pap smear. A 7-year, prospective study of the Norwegian population-based, coordinated screening program

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of being diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 or invasive cervical cancer (ICC) based on diagnostic and screening procedures performed after a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and to compare this risk to that in women with a normal Pap smears. STUDY DESIGN: A 7-year, prospective, cohort study was performed in the Norwegian population-based, coordinated screening program. After excluding women in the midst of follow-up of an abnormal Pap smear or with a history of CIN 2/3 or ICC, the study population consisted of women 25-69 years of age with a normal (n = 526,661) or ASCUS Pap smear (n = 10,037) in 1995-1996. Risk estimates were calculated by logistic and parametric survival regression. RESULTS: Within 7 years of an ASCUS smear, 1,017 women (10.1%) were diagnosed with CIN 2/3 and 62 (0.62%) with ICC. Women with an ASCUS index Pap smear had a relative risk of 15-30 of being diagnosed with histologically verified CIN 2/3 or ICC within the first 2 years of follow-up as compared to women with a normal index smear. In long-term follow-up, women with an ASCUS index smear followed by a normal smear, which cancelled further clinical follow-up, were at > 3.5 times higher risk of both CIN 2/3 and invasive cancer as compared to women with a normal index smear. CONCLUSION: Pap smear follow-up of women with an ASCUS smear does not identify all women at higher risk of CIN 2/3 and ICC. Other diagnostic procedures should be implemented to improve the screening program.     

Opportunistic testing of medically underserved women for cervical cancer in South Africa

OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of opportunistic Pap smears taken in an unscreened and medically underserved population in the Transkei Region of South Africa. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of 22,160 cervical cytology specimens from an unscreened population attending gynecologic outpatient clinics between January 1990 and December 1996. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS), low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) was, respectively, 34.7%, 8.3% and 2.4%. The ASCUS: SIL ratio was 3:1. The prevalence of invasive squamous cell carcinoma was 1.6%. The yield of opportunistic Pap smears was 10.7% including only LSIL and HSIL. CONCLUSION: The pathologic process of precursor lesions of cervical cancer appears to start at an early age since > 20% of cases are diagnosed before the age of 30 years. In the absence of a national screening program, opportunistic testing of medically underserved women needs to be maintained and encouraged.     

Impact of liquid-based gynecologic cytology on an HIV-positive population

OBJECTIVE: To examine the imprint of liquid-based technologies for cervicovaginal cytology on HIV-positive women, who are at high risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective search of the cytopathology files of Johns Hopkins Hospital for the cervicovaginal cytology of HIV-positive women to examine the effect of liquid-based technology on this population. RESULTS: Significant intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (low grade SIL or greater) were identified in 24% of the conventional smears and 23% of the liquid-based cytology. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)/atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance was diagnosed in 15% of the conventional smears and 9% of the liquid-based preparations (P = .02). In patients with ASCUS diagnoses and tissue follow-up within 7 months, significant SILs were identified in 29% with conventional smears and in 65% with liquid-based cytology. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of SILs between conventional smears and liquid-based cervicovaginal preparations in HIV-positive women. The diagnosis of ASCUS on liquid-based cytology may have an increased likelihood of representing a significant SIL in comparison to conventional smears. For the high-risk, HIV-positive population, immediate colposcopy and biopsy may be warranted following ASCUS diagnoses on liquid-based cytology.     

Utility of p16(ink4a) immunocytochemistry in liquid-based cytology specimens from women treated for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether p16(ink4a) immunocytochemical (ICC) expression detected intraepithelial disease in liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens from women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), whose specimen was labeled negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignany (NILM). STUDY DESIGN: Residual LBC specimens from women treated for HSIL (n = 21), whose LBC test was interpreted as NILM including marked benign inflammatory changes (BCC) were used. The control (n = 25) consisted of residual LBC specimens from women with documented HSIL. ICC for p16p(16k4a) was performed on a second ThinPrep (ThinPrep 2000, Cylyl Corporation, Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) preparation; the percentage ofpositive cells and intensity of immunostaining were recorded. Standard LBC preparations for p16(ink4a) ICC-positive and ICC-negative control cases were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 25 (96%) of the HSIL control group were ICC p16(ink4a) positive. In the NILM/BCC group, 2 of 21 with adequate LBC residua were ICC p16(ink4a) positive; on review both were reclassified as epithelial abnormality--1 HSIL and 1 atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL. In both, subsequent colposcopic biopsy yielded HSIL. CONCLUSION: p16(ink4a) ICC positivity on NILM/BCC LBC residua from patients with HSIL may identify cases that merit cytologic review and possible reclassification. The utility of p16(ink4a) ICC in this situation requires further study.     

Original cervical cytology and follow-up biopsy results in positive high risk human papillomavirus DNA tests with high-level resuls

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain Pap test and biopsy results of specimens with high level of human papillomavirus (HPv) DNA and compare atypical squamous cells of undetermined signiqicance (ASC-US) populations with HPV DNA. STUDY DESIGN: Positive HPV tests with relative light unit (RLU) values > or =1000 were identified and original Pap test and follow-up biopsy results recorded. Pap test and biopsy results for ASC-US were compared to positive results with RLU <1000. RESULTS: From 1892 total HPV-positive tests, 156 specimens with high RLU were identified; 145 had biopsies. The interpretations of the corresponding Pap tests were as follows: negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, 3; ASC-US, 87; ASC, cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 5; low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 40 and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 10. Biopsies showed 60 negative, 58 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 and 27 CIN 2+. In the highly positive ASCUS group, biopsy showed higher percentage of CIN 1 (33% vs. 16%) compared to the low-positive group. CONCLUSION: Compared to low-positive results, high-positive results showed more abnormal Pap tests. CIN 1 was a more likely result for high-positive ASCUS. More transient infections may account for these findings. The results do not argue for different management schemes between the categories.     

Expression of p16INK4A in Pap smears containing atypical glandular cells from the uterine cervix

OBJECTIVE: To verify one of the diagnostic dilemmas concerning atypical glandular cells (AGC) by immunocytochemical detection of p16INK4A (p16) applied to routine Pap smears with correlation of follow-up biopsies for improvement of cytologic diagnoses. STUDY DESIGN: The study included 36 Pap smears in AGC diagnostic categories, all of which were correlated histologically. The cytologic diagnoses of AGC were further classified according to the 2001 Bethesda System. All Pap smears were decolorized and immunostained with the primary anti-p16 antibody, clone E6H4. Immunoreactivity for p16 was correlated with histologic sections in a semiblind fashion. RESULTS: Of the 36 smears containing AGC, 22 (61%) were reclassified as general AGC and 14 (39%) as AGC--favor neoplasia. Follow-up biopsies revealed that 15 (42%) cervixes had no obvious abnormalities and that 21 (58%) cases had different cervical lesions. More than half the cases (19/36, 53%) of follow-up biopsies concerning AGC-containing smears represented significant lesions. There was a much higher proportion of significant lesions (13/14, 93%) in AGC--favor neoplasia than those (6/22, 27%) in general AGC cases. Fifteen of 36 (36%) AGC-containing cases were actually squamous abnormalities on follow-up biopsies. p16 Immunocytochemical stain was reactive in 22 (61%) of 36 smears, either weakly/sporadically (2 cases, 6%) or strongly positively (20 cases, 55%). Conversely, 14 (39%) of the smears were negative for p16 and displayed predominantly reactive changes. However, there was 1 case of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion showing negative immunostaining for p16. From the view-point of clinical significance, this analysis was highly sensitive (sensitivity, 95%) and specific (specificity, 88%) and had favorable positive (90%) and negative (94%) predictive values. CONCLUSION: On the basis of both morphologic and immunostaining patterns, there was a clear association between strong p16 immunostaining of atypical cells in smears and the presence of significant lesions in the cervix except in 1 patient. Similarly, there was a clear association between lack of p16 expression and absence of cervical lesions. p16 Immunocytochemical stain can be applied successfully to conventional Pap smears and may serve as a useful biomarker in diagnoses of AGC-containing smears. This may offer a more objective parameter to help clarify this ambiguous area of gynecologic cytopathology.     

Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the direct-to-vial efficacy of the SurePath Pap test (TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in a community hospital laboratory and to assess its impact on productivity, as measured by Pap test turnaround times (TATs). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 8,771 SurePath Pap tests were compared to 5,055 conventional Pap smears collected and processed over the same 12-month period. SurePath histologic correlation rates were compared to historical correlation rates for conventional Pap smears. Pap test TATs for 3 months prior to implementing SurePath were compared to TATs for the last 3 months of the study, which included an approximate 70:30 ratio of SurePath to conventional Pap tests. Laboratory staffing was unchanged, and mean monthly accessions were relatively constant. RESULTS: SurePath showed statistically significant improvements in the detection of low grade (LSIL) (196%) and high grade (HSIL) (243%) squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) relative to conventional Pap smears. The atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) rate remained nearly constant with SurePath, while the ASCUS/SIL ratio decreased by 68%. Unsatisfactory rates declined 81%. Histologic correlation rates with SurePath increased over those of conventional Pap smears. Pap test mean TATs improved 73% with SurePath. CONCLUSION: Sure-Path detected significantly more cases of LSIL and HSIL than conventional smears without compromising specificity. The ASCUS/SIL ratio and unsatisfactory rate declined dramatically. Pap test TATs also improved markedly with SurePath.     

Predictive power of cytomorphological features in equivocal (C3, C4) breast FNAC

Definitive immediate diagnosis in breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) remains the aim for cytopathologists. We reviewed 72 consecutive equivocal (C3 and C4) aspirates with respect to 16 cytomorphological criteria. We assessed the power of each criterion at predicting either a malignant [positive predictive value (PPV)] or a benign [negative predictive value (NPV)] diagnosis by correlation with follow-up histology. Blind review led to 34% of cases being correctly definitively diagnosed. Eccentrically placed epithelial cell nuclei (PPV = 88%, sensitivity = 67%, specificity = 87%) and coarse nuclear chromatin (PPV = 81%, sensitivity = 72%, specificity = 83%) are the features that are most useful in predicting malignancy in this selected series. The presence of myoepithelial cells within epithelial groups is not a good indicator of a benign diagnosis (NPV = 24%, sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 53%).