Cell-cycle-dependent gene expression studied by two-colour fluorescent detection of a mRNA and histone mRNA

We investigated whether a probe specific for histone H3 mRNA could be used as a marker to study cell-cycle dependency of gene expression by double-fluorescent RNA in situ hybridization (FISH). First, we showed that all S-phase cells in cell cultures having incorporated BrdU revealed histone H3 mRNA expression by RNA FISH, indicating that histone H3 expression is a reliable marker for S-phase cells. Second, we analysed whether the expression of human cytomegalovirus immediate early genes in rat 9G cells, which are known to be induced in an S-phase dependent way by cycloheximide, correlated with the expression of histone H3 mRNA. Double-hybridization experiments with a digoxigenin-labelled probe for IE mRNA and a fluoresceinated probe for histone H3 mRNA revealed that cells expressing IE mRNA also expressed histone H3 mRNA. Third, we examined the cell-cycle dependency of luciferase gene expression in X1 cells. Luciferase mRNA is heterogeneously expressed in X1 cell cultures, but cells expressing luciferase did not necessarily express histone H3 mRNA. This indicates that luciferase gene expression in X1 cells is not induced during S-phase. The results of our study show that histone H3 mRNA expression can be successfully used as a marker to establish cell-cycle dependency of gene expression by double-RNA FISH.     

DNA replication stress in CHK1-depleted tumour cells triggers premature (S-phase) mitosis through inappropriate activation of Aurora kinase B

The disruption of DNA replication in cells triggers checkpoint responses that slow-down S-phase progression and protect replication fork integrity. These checkpoints are also determinants of cell fate and can help maintain cell viability or trigger cell death pathways. CHK1 has a pivotal role in such S-phase responses. It helps maintain fork integrity during replication stress and protects cells from several catastrophic fates including premature mitosis, premature chromosome condensation and apoptosis. Here we investigated the role of CHK1 in protecting cancer cells from premature mitosis and apoptosis. We show that premature mitosis (characterized by the induction of histone H3 phosphorylation, aberrant chromatin condensation, and persistent RPA foci in arrested S-phase cells) is induced in p53-deficient tumour cells depleted of CHK1 when DNA synthesis is disrupted. These events are accompanied by an activation of Aurora kinase B in S-phase cells that is essential for histone H3 Ser10 phosphorylation. Histone H3 phosphorylation precedes the induction of apoptosis in p53−/− tumour cell lines but does not appear to be required for this fate as an Aurora kinase inhibitor suppresses phosphorylation of both Aurora B and histone H3 but has little effect on cell death. In contrast, only a small fraction of p53+/+ tumour cells shows this premature mitotic response, although they undergo a more rapid and robust apoptotic response. Taken together, our results suggest a novel role for CHK1 in the control of Aurora B activation during DNA replication stress and support the idea that premature mitosis is a distinct cell fate triggered by the disruption of DNA replication when CHK1 function is suppressed.     

Evaluation of cell proliferation in rat tissues with BrdU, PCNA, Ki-67(MIB-5) immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for histone mRNA.

The standard method for assessment of cell proliferation in paraffin-embedded tissue sections is 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunohistochemistry (IHC). BrdU can be administered to laboratory animals via IP injections, is readily incorporated into nuclei during the DNA synthetic phase of the cell cycle, and is detected with an anti-BrdU antibody. This method has several disadvantages, and an accurate method for evaluation of proliferative activity that can substitute for BrdU IHC, when necessary, is of great interest to investigators. Alternative methods for detection of proliferating cells in tissue sections are proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) IHC, Ki-67 IHC, and in situ hybridization (ISH) for histone mRNA. To determine the optimal choice, we analyzed the correlation of anti-PCNA, anti-Ki-67(MIB-5), and histone mRNA labeling indices (LIs) with anti-BrdU LI in rat highly replicative (renewing) tissues. The correlation between anti-BrdU and histone mRNA LIs, as well as the correlation between anti-BrdU and anti-Ki-67 LIs, was statistically significant. There was no significant correlation between anti-BrdU and anti-PCNA LIs. These results suggest that both ISH for histone mRNA and IHC with MIB-5 are preferable techniques for assessment of cell proliferation in rat paraffin-embedded renewing tissues compared to PCNA IHC. They can substitute for BrdU IHC when necessary.     

Characterization of the histone H1-binding protein, NASP, as a cell cycle-regulated somatic protein

Nuclear autoantigenic sperm protein (NASP), initially described as a highly autoimmunogenic testis and sperm-specific protein, is a histone-binding protein that is a homologue of the N1/N2 gene expressed in oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Here, we report a somatic form of NASP (sNASP) present in all mitotic cells examined, including mouse embryonic cells and several mouse and human tissue culture cell lines. Affinity chromatography and histone isolation demonstrate that NASP from myeloma cells is complexed only with H1, linker histones. Somatic NASP is a shorter version of testicular NASP (tNASP) with two deletions in the coding region arising from alternative splicing and differs from tNASP in its 5' untranslated regions. We examined the relationship between NASP mRNA expression and the cell cycle and report that in cultures of synchronized mouse 3T3 cells and HeLa cells sNASP mRNA levels increase during S-phase and decline in G(2), concomitant with histone mRNA levels. NASP protein levels remain stable in these cells but become undetectable in confluent cultures of nondividing CV-1 cells and in nonmitotic cells in various body tissues. Expression of sNASP mRNA is regulated during the cell cycle and, consistent with a role as a histone transport protein, NASP mRNA expression parallels histone mRNA expression.     

Two discrete modes of histone gene expression during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

We have used in situ hybridization to ovarian tissue sections to study the pattern of histone gene expression during oogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Our studies suggest that there are two distinct phases of histone gene expression during oogenesis. In the first phase, which occurs during early to middle oogenesis (stages 5-10A), we observe a mosaic pattern of histone mRNA in the 15 nurse cells of the egg chamber: some cells have very high levels of mRNA, while others have little or no mRNA. Our analysis suggests that there is a cyclic accumulation and subsequent degradation of histone mRNA in the egg chamber and that very little histone mRNA is transported into the growing oocyte. Moreover, since the endomitotic replication cycles of the nurse cells are asynchronous during this period, the mosaic distribution of histone message would suggest that the expression of the histone genes in each nurse cell nucleus is probably coupled to DNA replication as in most somatic cells. The second phase begins at stage 10B. During this period, histone gene expression appears to be "induced" in all 15 nurse cells of the egg chamber, and instead of a mosaic pattern, high levels of histone mRNA are found in all cells. Unlike the earlier phase, this expression is apparently uncoupled from the endomitotic replication of the nurse cells (which are completed by the end of stage 10A). Moreover, much of the newly synthesized histone mRNA is transported from the nurse cells into the oocyte where it accumulates and is stored for use during early embryogenesis. Finally, we have also observed tightly clustered grains within nurse cell nuclei in non-denatured tissue sections. As was the case with cytoplasmic histone mRNA, there is a mosaic distribution of nuclear grains from stages 5 to 10A, while at stage 10B, virtually all nurse cell nuclei have grain clusters. These grain clusters appear to be due to the hybridization of nurse cell histone gene DNA to our probe, and are localized in specific regions of the nucleus.     

The coupling of epigenome replication with DNA replication

In multicellular organisms, each cell contains the same DNA sequence, but with different epigenetic information that determines the cell specificity. Semi-conservative DNA replication faithfully copies the parental nucleotide sequence into two DNA daughter strands during each cell cycle. At the same time, epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation and histone modifications are either precisely transmitted to the daughter cells or dynamically changed during S-phase. Recent studies indicate that in each cell cycle, many DNA replication related proteins are involved in not only genomic but also epigenomic replication. Histone modification proteins, chromatin remodeling proteins, histone variants, and RNAs participate in the epigenomic replication during S-phase. As a consequence, epigenome replication is closely linked with DNA replication during S-phase.     

Coordinate regulation of histone mRNAs during growth and differentiation of rat myoblasts

To determine whether histone genes are coordinately regulated, histone mRNA concentrations were measured in exponentially growing L6 myoblasts, S-phase synchronized myoblasts and in differentiating myoblasts. The levels of various histone mRNA subspecies declined rapidly and coordinately once myoblasts were given the signal to differentiate. mRNA levels were reduced on average to 1-5% of the amount observed in exponentially growing cells by 48 h after the signal to differentiate. The reductions occurred in concert with the cessation of DNA synthesis as the cells differentiated. Inhibition of DNA synthesis by treating myoblasts with Ara-C or hydroxyurea resulted in a histone mRNA half-life of 10-13 min for each of the histones examined. One example of non-coordinate regulation was observed however among the H4 mRNA subspecies in S-phase synchronized cells. The levels of two major subspecies of H4 mRNA increased coordinately in S-phase compared to levels observed in cells growing exponentially. A third subspecies of H4 mRNA on the other hand was found to decline by 50%. These studies suggest that the majority of histone mRNA subspecies are under coordinate control, although one exception has been noted among the subspecies of histone H4.     

DNA Replication-Dependent Histone H2A mRNA Expression in Pea Root Tips

Histone H2A mRNA is selectively expressed in scattered subpopulations of cells in the pea (Pisum sativum) root apical meristem. To study whether this specific expression was associated with the cell cycle, a double-labeling technique was used to identify cells replicating DNA during S phase and those expressing H2A mRNA. Cells in S phase were detected by [3H]thymidine incorporation and autoradiography, whereas cells containing H2A mRNA were identified by in situ hybridization using digoxigenin-labeled probes. Approximately 92% of the [3H]thymidine-labeled S-phase cells expressed H2A mRNA and 85% of cells that expressed H2A mRNA were in S phase. In root tissue located basal to the promeristem, synchronous co-located expression was observed in scattered packets of proliferating cells. Furthermore, neither H2A mRNA nor S-phase cells could be detected within the quiescent center or mature root cap. When DNA synthesis was inhibited with hydroxyurea, a commensurate and specific decrease in steady-state levels of H2A mRNA was found. We conclude that cell-specific expression of pea histone H2A mRNA is replication dependent and that H2A mRNA is transiently accumulated during a period of the cell cycle that mostly overlaps the S phase. We propose that the overlap between H2A expression and S phase could occur if H2A mRNA accumulation began in late G1 and abated in late S.