Sequence changes in both flanking sequences of a pre-tRNA influence the cleavage specificity of RNase P.

The cleavage specificities of the RNase P holoenzymes from Escherichia coli and the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and of the catalytic M1 RNA from E. coli were analyzed in 5'-processing experiments using a yeast serine pre-tRNA with mutations in both flanking sequences. The template DNAs were obtained by enzymatic reactions in vitro and transcribed with phage SP6 or T7 RNA polymerase. The various mutations did not alter the cleavage specificity of the yeast RNase P holoenzyme; cleavage always occurred predominantly at position G + 1, generating the typical seven base-pair acceptor stem. In contrast, the specificity of the prokaryotic RNase P activities, i.e. the catalytic M1 RNA and the RNase P holoenzyme from E. coli, was influenced by some of the mutated pre-tRNA substrates, which resulted in an unusual cleavage pattern, generating extended acceptor stems. The bases G - 1 and C + 73, forming the eighth base pair in these extended acceptor stems, were an important motif in promoting the unusual cleavage pattern. It was found only in some natural pre-tRNAs, including tRNA(SeCys) from E. coli, and tRNAs(His) from bacteria and chloroplasts. Also, the corresponding mature tRNAs in vivo contain an eight base pair acceptor stem. The presence of the CCA sequence at the 3' end of the tRNA moiety is known to enhance the cleavage efficiency with the catalytic M1 RNA. Surprisingly, the presence or absence of this sequence in two of our substrate mutants drastically altered the cleavage specificity of M1 RNA and of the E. coli holoenzyme, respectively. Possible reasons for the different cleavage specificities of the enzymes, the influence of sequence alterations and the importance of stacking forces in the acceptor stems are discussed.     

Both N-terminal catalytic and C-terminal RNA binding domain contribute to substrate specificity and cleavage site selection of RNase III.

The double-stranded RNA-specific endoribonuclease III (RNase III) of bacteria consists of an N-terminal nuclease domain and a double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) at the C-terminus. Analysis of two hybrid proteins consisting of the N-terminal half of Escherichia coli RNase III fused to the dsRBD of the Rhodobacter capsulatus enzyme and vice versa reveals that both domains in combination with the particular substrate determine substrate specificity and cleavage site selection. Extension of the spacer between the two domains of the E. coli enzyme from nine to 20 amino acids did not affect cleavage site selection.     

Evaluation of the RNA determinants for bacterial and yeast RNase III binding and cleavage

Bacterial double-stranded RNA-specific RNase III recognizes the A-form of an RNA helix with little sequence specificity. In contrast, baker yeast RNase III (Rnt1p) selectively recognizes NGNN tetraloops even when they are attached to a B-form DNA helix. To comprehend the general mechanism of RNase III substrate recognition, we mapped the Rnt1p binding signal and directly compared its substrate specificity to that of both Escherichia coli RNase III and fission yeast RNase III (PacI). Rnt1p bound but did not cleave long RNA duplexes without NGNN tetraloops, whereas RNase III indiscriminately cleaved all RNA duplexes. PacI cleaved RNA duplexes with some preferences for NGNN-capped RNA stems under physiological conditions. Hydroxyl radical footprints indicate that Rnt1p specifically interacts with the NGNN tetraloop and its surrounding nucleotides. In contrast, Rnt1p interaction with GAAA-capped hairpins was weak and largely unspecific. Certain duality of substrate recognition was exhibited by PacI but not by bacterial RNase III. E. coli RNase III recognized RNA duplexes longer than 11 bp with little specificity, and no specific features were required for cleavage. On the other hand, PacI cleaved long, but not short, RNA duplexes with little sequence specificity. PacI cleavage of RNA stems shorter than 27 bp was dependent on the presence of an UU-UC internal loop two nucleotides upstream of the cleavage site. These observations suggest that yeast RNase IIIs have two recognition mechanisms, one that uses specific structural features and another that recognizes general features of the A-form RNA helix.     

Investigating the structure of human RNase H1 by site-directed mutagenesis

In this study we examine for the first time the roles of the various domains of human RNase H1 by site-directed mutagenesis. The carboxyl terminus of human RNase H1 is highly conserved with Escherichia coli RNase H1 and contains the amino acid residues of the putative catalytic site and basic substrate-binding domain of the E. coli RNase enzyme. The amino terminus of human RNase H1 contains a structure consistent with a double-strand RNA (dsRNA) binding motif that is separated from the conserved E. coli RNase H1 region by a 62-amino acid sequence. These studies showed that although the conserved amino acid residues of the putative catalytic site and basic substrate-binding domain are required for RNase H activity, deletion of either the catalytic site or the basic substrate-binding domain did not ablate binding to the heteroduplex substrate. Deletion of the region between the dsRNA-binding domain and the conserved E. coli RNase H1 domain resulted in a significant loss in the RNase H activity. Furthermore, the binding affinity of this deletion mutant for the heteroduplex substrate was approximately 2-fold tighter than the wild-type enzyme suggesting that this central 62-amino acid region does not contribute to the binding affinity of the enzyme for the substrate. The dsRNA-binding domain was not required for RNase H activity, as the dsRNA-deletion mutants exhibited catalytic rates approximately 2-fold faster than the rate observed for wild-type enzyme. Comparison of the dissociation constant of human RNase H1 and the dsRNA-deletion mutant for the heteroduplex substrate indicates that the deletion of this region resulted in a 5-fold loss in binding affinity. Finally, comparison of the cleavage patterns exhibited by the mutant proteins with the cleavage pattern for the wild-type enzyme indicates that the dsRNA-binding domain is responsible for the observed strong positional preference for cleavage exhibited by human RNase H1.