Evidence that Antibody-Mediated Neutralization of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by Sera from Infected Individuals Is Independent of Coreceptor Usage

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) uses a variety of chemokine receptors as coreceptors for virus entry, and the ability of the virus to be neutralized by antibody may depend on which coreceptors are used. In particular, laboratory-adapted variants of the virus that use CXCR4 as a coreceptor are highly sensitive to neutralization by sera from HIV-1-infected individuals, whereas primary isolates that use CCR5 instead of, or in addition to, CXCR4 are neutralized poorly. To determine whether this dichotomy in neutralization sensitivity could be explained by differential coreceptor usage, virus neutralization by serum samples from HIV-1-infected individuals was assessed in MT-2 cells, which express CXCR4 but not CCR5, and in mitogen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), where multiple coreceptors including CXCR4 and CCR5 are available for use. Our results showed that three of four primary isolates with a syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype and that use CXCR4 and CCR5 were neutralized poorly in both MT-2 cells and PBMC. The fourth isolate, designated 89.6, was more sensitive to neutralization in MT-2 cells than in PBMC. We showed that the neutralization of 89.6 in PBMC was not improved when CCR5 was blocked by having RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in the culture medium, indicating that CCR5 usage was not responsible for the decreased sensitivity to neutralization in PBMC. Consistent with this finding, a laboratory-adapted strain of virus (IIIB) was significantly more sensitive to neutralization in CCR5-deficient PBMC (homozygous Δ32-CCR5 allele) than were two of two SI primary isolates tested. The results indicate that the ability of HIV-1 to be neutralized by sera from infected individuals depends on factors other than coreceptor usage.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), the etiologic agent of AIDS, utilizes the HLA class II receptor, CD4, as its primary receptor to gain entry into cells (17, 30). Entry is initiated by a high-affinity interaction between CD4 and the surface gp120 of the virus (32). Subsequent to this interaction, conformational changes that permit fusion of the viral membrane with cellular membranes occur within the viral transmembrane gp41 (9, 58, 59). In addition to CD4, one or more recently described viral coreceptors are needed for fusion to take place. These coreceptors belong to a family of seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled proteins and include the CXC chemokine receptor CXCR4 (3, 4, 24, 44), the CC chemokine receptors CCR5 (1, 12, 13, 18, 21, 23, 45) and, less commonly, CCR3 and CCR2b (12, 21), and two related orphan receptors termed BONZO/STRL33 and BOB (19, 34). Coreceptor usage by HIV-1 can be blocked by naturally occurring ligands, including SDF-1 for CXCR4 (4, 44), RANTES, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β in the case of CCR5 (13, 45), and eotaxin for CCR3 (12).The selective cellular tropisms of different strains of HIV-1 may be determined in part by coreceptor usage. For example, all culturable HIV-1 variants replicate initially in mitogen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), but only a minor fraction are able to infect established CD4⁺ T-cell lines (43). This differential tropism is explained by the expression of CXCR4 together with CCR5 and other CC chemokine coreceptors on PBMC and the lack of expression of CCR5 on most T-cell lines (5, 10, 19, 35, 39, 50, 53). Indeed, low-passage field strains (i.e., primary isolates) of HIV-1 that fail to replicate in T-cell lines use CCR5 as their major coreceptor and are unable to use CXCR4 (1, 12, 18, 21, 23, 28). Because these isolates rarely produce syncytia in PBMC and fail to infect MT-2 cells, they are often classified as having a non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) phenotype. Primary isolates with a syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype are able to use CXCR4 alone or, more usually, in addition to CCR5 (16, 20, 51). HIV-1 variants that have been passaged multiple times in CD4⁺ T-cell lines, and therefore considered to be laboratory adapted, exhibit a pattern of coreceptor usage that resembles that of SI primary isolates. Most studies have shown that the laboratory-adapted strain IIIB uses CXCR4 alone (3, 13, 20, 24, 51) and that MN and SF-2 use CXCR4 primarily and CCR5 to a lesser degree (11, 13). Sequences within the V3 loop of gp120 have been shown to be important, either directly or indirectly, for the interaction of HIV-1 with both CXCR4 (52) and CCR5 (12, 14, 54, 60). This region of gp120 contains multiple determinants of cellular tropism (43) and is a major target for neutralizing antibodies to laboratory-adapted HIV-1 but not to primary isolates (29, 46, 57).It has been known for some time that the ability of sera from HIV-1-infected individuals to neutralize laboratory-adapted strains of HIV-1 does not predict their ability to neutralize primary isolates in vitro (7). In general, the former viruses are highly sensitive to neutralization whereas the latter viruses are neutralized poorly by antibodies induced in response to HIV-1 infection (7, 43). Importantly, neutralizing antibodies generated by candidate HIV-1 subunit vaccines have been highly specific for laboratory-adapted viruses (26, 37, 38). In principle, the dichotomy in neutralization sensitivity between these two categories of virus could be related to coreceptor usage. To test this, we investigated whether the use of CXCR4 in the absence of CCR5 would render SI primary isolates highly sensitive to neutralization in vitro by sera from HIV-1-infected individuals. Two similar studies using human monoclonal antibodies and soluble CD4 have been reported (31a, 55).     

Endosomal Trafficking of HIV-1 Gag and Genomic RNAs Regulates Viral Egress

HIV-1 Gag can assemble and generate virions at the plasma membrane, but it is also present in endosomes where its role remains incompletely characterized. Here, we show that HIV-1 RNAs and Gag are transported on endosomal vesicles positive for TiVamp, a v-SNARE involved in fusion events with the plasma membrane. Inhibition of endosomal traffic did not prevent viral release. However, inhibiting lysosomal degradation induced an accumulation of Gag in endosomes and increased viral production 7-fold, indicating that transport of Gag to lysosomes negatively regulates budding. This also suggested that endosomal Gag-RNA complexes could access retrograde pathways to the cell surface and indeed, depleting cells of TiVamp-reduced viral production. Moreover, inhibition of endosomal transport prevented the accumulation of Gag at sites of cellular contact. HIV-1 Gag could thus generate virions using two pathways, either directly from the plasma membrane or through an endosome-dependent route. Endosomal Gag-RNA complexes may be delivered at specific sites to facilitate cell-to-cell viral transmission.The production of infectious retroviral particles is an ordered process that includes many steps (for review see Refs. 1–3). In particular, three major viral components, Gag, the envelope, and genomic RNAs have to traffic inside the cell to reach their assembly site. Viral biogenesis is driven by the polyprotein Gag, which is able to make viral-like particles when expressed alone (4). Upon release, HIV-1⁴ Gag is processed by the viral protease into matrix (MA(p17)), capsid (CA(p24)), nucleocapsid (NC(p7)), p6, and smaller peptides SP1 and SP2. Gag contains several domains that are essential for viral assembly: a membrane binding domain (M) in MA; a Gag-Gag interaction domain in CA; an assembly domain (I) in NC; and a late domain (L) in p6, which recruits the cellular budding machinery. Genomic RNAs are specifically recognized by NC, and they play fundamental roles in viral biogenesis by acting as a scaffold for Gag multimerization (5).It has been demonstrated that retroviruses bud by hijacking the endosomal machinery that sorts proteins into internal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (for review, see Refs. 6, 7). Indeed, these vesicles bud with the same topology as viral particles. Proteins sorted into this pathway are usually destined for degradation in lysosomes, but some can also recycle to the plasma membrane (for review see Refs. 8, 9). They are also frequently ubiquitinated on their cytoplasmic domain (10, 11), allowing their recognition by ESCRT complexes. ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I recognize ubiquitinated cargo present at the surface of endosomes and recruit other ESCRT complexes (12–14). ESCRT-III is believed to function directly in the formation of multivesicular body intralumenal vesicles (12), even though its mechanism of action is currently not understood. Remarkably, Gag L domains interact directly with components of the multivesicular body-sorting machinery (for review see Ref. 15). HIV-1 Gag uses a PTAP motif to bind Tsg101, a component of ESCRT-I (16–19), and a YPLTSL motif to interact with Alix, a protein linked to ESCRT-I and -III (20–22). Finally, various ubiquitin ligases are also required directly or indirectly during HIV-1 biogenesis (23, 24; for review see Ref. 25).In many cell lines, Gag is found both at the plasma membrane and in endosomes. This has led to the hypothesis that there are several assembly sites for HIV-1 (1, 3). First, Gag can initiate and complete assembly at the plasma membrane. This is thought to occur predominantly in T lymphocytes, and this process is supported by several lines of evidences: (i) disruption of endosomal trafficking with drugs does not prevent viral production (26, 27); (ii) ESCRT complexes can be recruited at the plasma membrane, at sites where Gag accumulates (28–30); (iii) Gag can be seen multimerizing and budding from the plasma membrane in live cells (31). Second, Gag could initiate assembly in endosomes, and then traffic to the cell surface to be released. This is mainly supported by the presence of Gag in endosomes in several cell lines (32–34), including T cells and more strikingly macrophages (32, 35, 36–39). However, we are currently lacking functional experiments addressing the role of this endosomal pool of Gag, and it is still not clear to what extent it contributes to the production of viral particles. Nevertheless, the presence of Gag in endosomes might facilitate recruitment of ESCRT complexes (34, 40), packaging of viral genomic RNAs (32, 41), and incorporation of the envelope (42). It may also be important for polarized budding (43, 44) and to create a viral reservoir in infected cells (45, 46).Despite great progress, the traffic of HIV-1 components is still not fully elucidated. In particular, the transport of the genomic RNAs is poorly understood. In this study, we have used single molecule techniques to investigate the trafficking of HIV-1 RNAs in fixed and live cells, and we show that they are transported on endosomal vesicles. We also obtained functional evidence that Gag and viral RNAs can use at least two trafficking pathways to produce virions, one going directly from the plasma membrane and another one passing through endosomes.     

Analysis of Free Energy Signals Arising from Nucleotide Hybridization Between rRNA and mRNA Sequences during Translation in Eubacteria

A decoding algorithm is tested that mechanistically models the progressive alignments that arise as the mRNA moves past the rRNA tail during translation elongation. Each of these alignments provides an opportunity for hybridization between the single-stranded, -terminal nucleotides of the 16S rRNA and the spatially accessible window of mRNA sequence, from which a free energy value can be calculated. Using this algorithm we show that a periodic, energetic pattern of frequency 1/3 is revealed. This periodic signal exists in the majority of coding regions of eubacterial genes, but not in the non-coding regions encoding the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Signal analysis reveals that the population of coding regions of each bacterial species has a mean phase that is correlated in a statistically significant way with species () content. These results suggest that the periodic signal could function as a synchronization signal for the maintenance of reading frame and that codon usage provides a mechanism for manipulation of signal phase.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Analysis of the Assembly Function of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Protein Nucleocapsid Domain

Previous studies have shown that in addition to its function in specific RNA encapsidation, the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nucleocapsid (NC) is required for efficient virus particle assembly. However, the mechanism by which NC facilitates the assembly process is not clearly established. Formally, NC could act by constraining the Pr55^gag polyprotein into an assembly-competent conformation or by masking residues which block the assembly process. Alternatively, the capacity of NC to bind RNA or make interprotein contacts might affect particle assembly. To examine its role in the assembly process, we replaced the NC domain in Pr55^gag with polypeptide domains of known function, and the chimeric proteins were analyzed for their abilities to direct the release of virus-like particles. Our results indicate that NC does not mask inhibitory domains and does not act passively, by simply providing a stable folded monomeric structure. However, replacement of NC by polypeptides which form interprotein contacts permitted efficient virus particle assembly and release, even when RNA was not detected in the particles. These results suggest that formation of interprotein contacts by NC is essential to the normal HIV-1 assembly process.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) encodes three major genes, gag, pol, and env, which are commonly found in all mammalian retroviruses. It also encodes accessory genes whose protein products are important for regulation of its life cycle (6, 30, 35). However, of all the genes encoded by HIV-1, only the protein product of the gag gene has been found to be necessary and sufficient for the assembly of virus-like particles (11, 13, 17, 22, 32, 33). The HIV-1 Gag protein initially is expressed as a 55-kDa polyprotein precursor (Pr55^gag), but during or shortly after particle release, Pr55^gag ordinarily is cleaved by the viral protease (PR). The products of the protease action are the four major viral proteins matrix (MA), capsid (CA), nucleocapsid (NC), and p6, and the two spacer polypeptides p2 and p1, which represent sequences between CA and NC and between NC and p6, respectively (15, 19, 23, 30).The HIV-1 nucleocapsid proteins have two Cys-X₂-Cys-X₄-His-X₄-Cys (Cys-His) motifs, reminiscent of the zinc finger motifs found in many DNA binding proteins, and NC has been shown to facilitate the specific encapsidation of HIV-1 genomic RNAs. In addition to its encapsidation function, NC influences virus particle assembly (7, 10, 17, 21, 40). In particular, Gag proteins lacking the NC domain fail to assemble virus particles efficiently. Nevertheless, some chimeric Gag proteins which carry foreign sequences in place of NC have been shown to assemble and release virus particles at wild-type (wt) levels (2, 37, 40). Thus, it appears that in some circumstances, the role that NC plays in virus particle assembly can be replaced. To date, it is not clear how NC affects particle assembly, although several possibilities might be envisioned. One possibility is that deletion of NC unmasks inhibitory sequences in p2 or the C terminus of CA. Alternatively, NC may simply provide a stable monomeric folded structure which locks CA or other Gag domains into an assembly-competent conformation. Another possibility is that NC facilitates assembly by forming essential protein-protein contacts between neighbor Pr^gag molecules, as suggested in cross-linking studies (21). Finally, the assembly role of NC may stem from its RNA binding capabilities, a hypothesis supported by studies of Campbell and Vogt (5), which have shown that RNA facilitates the in vitro assembly of retroviral Gag proteins into higher-order structures.To distinguish among possible mechanisms by which NC facilitates HIV-1 assembly, we replaced NC with polypeptides having known structural characteristics and examined particle assembly directed by these chimeric proteins. Using this approach, we have found that NC does not play a passive role in HIV-1 assembly as either a mask to assembly inhibitor domains or a nonspecific, stably folded structure. Rather, sequences known to form strong interprotein contacts were observed to enhance assembly, suggesting a similar role for the NC domain itself. With several assembly-competent chimeric proteins, we detected no particle-associated RNAs. These results suggest that while RNA may be essential to virus assembly in the context of the wt Pr55^gag protein, it is dispensable for formation of virus-like particles from chimeric proteins.     

Extent of Antigenic Diversity in the V3 Region of the Surface Glycoprotein,gp120, of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Group M and Consequences for Serotyping

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) may be studied by molecular or immunological approaches. Most analyses have been performed by genetic comparison of isolates and have led to the definition of clades or subtypes within the major (M) group of HIV-1. Five subtypes (A to E) were initially identified by comparison of genomic sequences. Four new subtypes (F to I) were identified more recently. Amino acid differences in the immunogenic V3 loop between isolates have also been studied, leading to a phenetic classification of at least 14 clusters (1 to 14) of sequences (B. T. M. Korber, K. McInnes, R. F. Smith, and G. Myers, J. Virol. 68:6730–6744, 1994). In this study, we compared the antigenicity of the V3 consensus sequences defined by phylogenetic analysis to the antigenicity of those defined by phenetic analysis. We used a recently developed subtype-specific enzyme immunoassay (SSEIA) that uses the principle of blocking with an excess of peptide in the liquid phase. Two SSEIAs were performed, the first with five V3 sequences defined by phylogenetic analysis and the second with 14 V3 sequences defined by phenetic analysis. A total of 168 HIV-1 sera taken from seropositive individuals from seven different countries or regions were studied. Experimental and statistical data, including correlation matrix and cluster analyses, demonstrated associations between the genetic subtypes and phenetically associated groups. Most of these were predicted by Korber et al. (J. Virol. 68:6730–6744, 1994) by theoretical analysis. We also found that V3 sequences can be grouped into between three and five antigenically unrelated categories. Residues that may be responsible for major antigenic differences were identified at the apex of the V3 loop, within the octapeptide xIGPGxxx, where x represents the critical positions. Our study provides evidence that there is a limited number of V3 serotypes which could be easily monitored by serological assays to study the diversity and dynamics of HIV-1 strains.The diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is a major problem in the development of an effective vaccine against AIDS. Many HIV-1 sequences are now available, and phylogenetic analysis resulting in a continuously developing classification into subtypes or clades is possible (45). HIV-1 isolates are classified into the M group (for major) or O group (for outlier). The O group contains only a few variants, all from a limited area of Africa (19, 27, 50). The M group includes variants responsible for the present AIDS pandemic. It contains at least five subtypes (A to E), to which have been added more recently four other subtypes (F to I) (23, 28, 34, 36, 37). Subtypes A, C, D, G, and H are common in Africa (21, 35, 37, 38). Subtype B is the most common in America and Europe (24, 26, 51). Subtype E occurs mainly in Asia (25, 30, 41), and subtype F has been detected in Brazil and Romania (3, 28, 34). These distributions are not restrictive. Subtype C is also present in Asia (India and China), and subtype G is also present in Russia (7, 12, 29). The African subtypes (A, C, and D) and the Asian subtype (E) have also been identified in North America and in European countries (9, 13, 14, 32, 48). All the subtypes are present in Africa, including B (detected in West Africa), E (Central African Republic), and F (Cameroon) (1, 35, 38). Analysis of the genetic diversity of HIV-1 is becoming more difficult due to the increasing frequency of coinfections and recombinations (15, 20, 44).Phylogenetic trees have been generated with gag, env, or tat nucleotide sequences. Shorter DNA sequences encoding the functionally important V3 region of the envelope protein are most frequently used to provide reliable subtype designations (37). The diversity of the immunogenic V3 loop has also been studied by comparing the amino acids of different isolates, leading to a phenetic classification of at least 14 clusters of sequences, each one characterized by a consensus sequence based on the most common amino acid in a given position (22).The heterogeneity of HIV-1 strains is studied mostly by molecular characterization of genomic sequences. This involves sequencing fragments amplified by the PCR or the use of the heteroduplex mobility assay (10, 11). However, although these methods allow direct subtype classification, they are time-consuming and expensive and require highly trained workers. Serotyping of HIV-1 by antibody (Ab) binding to the V3 region has been suggested as an alternative approach (8, 40, 49, 51). Such an approach may make it possible to identify subtypes based on antigenic rather than genetic properties. This immunological information about antigenic diversity might be of value in vaccine development. We recently developed a subtype-specific enzyme immunoassay (SSEIA) which gave results consistent with those of genotyping (4, 48). This assay used V3 consensus sequences defined by genetic classification, so we wanted to compare the antigenicity of these V3 consensus sequences to the antigenicity of those defined by phenetic analysis. The phenetic clustering of V3 loop amino acid sequences is not always consistent with phylogenetic analysis. Our results suggested that a limited number of serotypes may exist and identified amino acids at the tip of the V3 loop that may be responsible for serological discrimination.     

Proteomics Identification of Drosophila Small Interfering RNA-associated Factors

The Drosophila melanogaster RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) forms a large ribonucleoprotein particle on small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and catalyzes target mRNA cleavage during RNA interference (RNAi). Dicer-2, R2D2, Loquacious, and Argonaute-2 are examples of RISC-associated factors that are involved in RNAi. Holo-RISC is an ∼80 S small interfering ribonucleoprotein, which suggests that there are many additional proteins that participate in the RNAi pathway. In this study, we used siRNA affinity capture combined with mass spectrometry to identify novel components of the Drosophila RNAi machinery. Our study identified both established RISC components and novel siRNA-associated factors, many of which contain domains that are consistent with potential roles in RNAi. Functional analysis of these novel siRNA-associated proteins suggests that these factors may play an important role in RNAi.Small RNAs can regulate gene expression through a collection of mechanisms broadly termed RNA silencing. Small RNA-mediated silencing mechanisms occur in most species (1–5). The ability to silence the expression of specific genes using small RNAs via RNA interference (RNAi)¹ has greatly facilitated our understanding of gene function in eukaryotes. In addition, small RNA-mediated gene silencing has therapeutic potential and holds promise for the treatment of specific diseases (6). Understanding the mechanism of RNAi and identifying the components of the RNAi machinery are essential for harnessing its full potential in both genome-wide screens and therapeutic applications.Recently, high throughput sequencing technology has revealed the presence of endogenous siRNAs in plant, fly, worm, and mammalian cells (7–16). These endogenous siRNAs target transposable element RNAs, pseudogene RNAs, and protein-coding mRNAs (17). Therefore, the endogenous siRNA pathway seems to have evolved as a mechanism of cellular defense against selfish genetic elements. The roles of these siRNAs in development and cell physiology are poorly understood.Drosophila melanogaster is a well characterized model system for studying RNAi. In Drosophila, long double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) are processed by the endonuclease Dicer-2 into 21-nucleotide siRNAs (18). After processing, these siRNAs form an initiator complex with Dicer-2 and the dsRNA-binding domain (dsRBD)-containing protein R2D2 (19–23). This R2D2-Dicer-2 Initiator (RDI) complex transitions to a larger siRNP called the RISC loading complex (21, 22, 24, 25) and then to pre-RISC (26). Subsequently, pre-RISC matures into holo-RISC, which includes the catalytic activity necessary for target mRNA cleavage (21, 25, 27). The endonuclease subunit responsible for target cleavage in holo-RISC is Argonaute-2 (Ago2) (28, 29), which uses the guide strand of the siRNA duplex to target complementary mRNA sequences for cleavage and degradation.Studies of the RDI complex strongly suggest that it includes no other proteins besides Dicer-2 and R2D2 (22). Additional proteins such as Ago2 are present in pre-RISC and holo-RISC, but nonetheless the complete compositions of the RISC loading complex, pre-RISC, and holo-RISC are unknown. Furthermore, holo-RISC sediments at ∼80 S during sucrose gradient centrifugation (30). These observations indicate that additional protein factors associate with siRNAs. In this study, we identified siRNA-binding proteins from Drosophila embryo extracts. Target cleavage assays and immunoblotting of our siRNA affinity-selected proteins suggest that we purified active holo-RISC components. Proteomics analysis of the affinity matrix revealed both established and novel siRNA-associated proteins. Functional analyses of a subset of these factors suggest that they play important roles in RNAi.     

CD4 Glycoprotein Degradation Induced by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpu Protein Requires the Function of Proteasomes and the Ubiquitin-Conjugating Pathway

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vpu gene encodes a type I anchored integral membrane phosphoprotein with two independent functions. First, it regulates virus release from a post-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartment by an ion channel activity mediated by its transmembrane anchor. Second, it induces the selective down regulation of host cell receptor proteins (CD4 and major histocompatibility complex class I molecules) in a process involving its phosphorylated cytoplasmic tail. In the present work, we show that the Vpu-induced proteolysis of nascent CD4 can be completely blocked by peptide aldehydes that act as competitive inhibitors of proteasome function and also by lactacystin, which blocks proteasome activity by covalently binding to the catalytic β subunits of proteasomes. The sensitivity of Vpu-induced CD4 degradation to proteasome inhibitors paralleled the inhibition of proteasome degradation of a model ubiquitinated substrate. Characterization of CD4-associated oligosaccharides indicated that CD4 rescued from Vpu-induced degradation by proteasome inhibitors is exported from the ER to the Golgi complex. This finding suggests that retranslocation of CD4 from the ER to the cytosol may be coupled to its proteasomal degradation. CD4 degradation mediated by Vpu does not require the ER chaperone calnexin and is dependent on an intact ubiquitin-conjugating system. This was demonstrated by inhibition of CD4 degradation (i) in cells expressing a thermally inactivated form of the ubiquitin-activating enzyme E₁ or (ii) following expression of a mutant form of ubiquitin (Lys₄₈ mutated to Arg₄₈) known to compromise ubiquitin targeting by interfering with the formation of polyubiquitin complexes. CD4 degradation was also prevented by altering the four Lys residues in its cytosolic domain to Arg, suggesting a role for ubiquitination of one or more of these residues in the process of degradation. The results clearly demonstrate a role for the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the process of Vpu-induced CD4 degradation. In contrast to other viral proteins (human cytomegalovirus US2 and US11), however, whose translocation of host ER molecules into the cytosol occurs in the presence of proteasome inhibitors, Vpu-targeted CD4 remains in the ER in a transport-competent form when proteasome activity is blocked.

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific accessory protein Vpu performs two distinct functions in the viral life cycle (11, 12, 29, 34, 46, 47, 50–52; reviewed in references 31 and 55): enhancement of virus particle release from the cell surface, and the selective induction of proteolysis of newly synthesized membrane proteins. Known targets for Vpu include the primary virus receptor CD4 (63, 64) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (28). Vpu is an oligomeric class I integral membrane phosphoprotein (35, 48, 49) with a structurally and functionally defined domain architecture: an N-terminal transmembrane anchor and C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (20, 34, 45, 47, 50, 65). Vpu-induced degradation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane proteins involves the phosphorylated cytoplasmic tail of the protein (50), whereas the virion release function is mediated by a cation-selective ion channel activity associated with the membrane anchor (19, 31, 45, 47).CD4 is a 55-kDa class I integral membrane glycoprotein that serves as the primary coreceptor for HIV entry into cells. CD4 consists of a large lumenal domain, a transmembrane peptide, and a 38-residue cytoplasmic tail. It is expressed on the surface of a subset of T lymphocytes that recognize MHC class II-associated peptides, and it plays a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of the immune system (reviewed in reference 30). Down regulation of CD4 in HIV-1-infected cells is mediated through several independent mechanisms (reviewed in references 5 and 55): intracellular complex formation of CD4 with the HIV envelope protein gp160 (8, 14), endocytosis of cell surface CD4 induced by the HIV-1 nef gene product (1, 2), and ER degradation induced by the HIV-1 vpu gene product (63, 64).Vpu-induced degradation of CD4 is an example of ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD). ERAD is a common outcome when proteins in the secretory pathway are unable to acquire their native structure (4). Although it was thought that ERAD occurs exclusively inside membrane vesicles of the ER or other related secretory compartments, this has gained little direct experimental support. Indeed, there are several recent reports that ERAD may actually represent export of the target protein to the cytosol, where it is degraded by cytosolic proteases. It was found that in yeast, a secreted protein, prepro-α-factor (pαF), is exported from microsomes and degraded in the cytosol in a proteasome-dependent manner (36). This process was dependent on the presence of calnexin, an ER-resident molecular chaperone that interacts with N-linked oligosaccharides containing terminal glucose residues (3). In mammalian cells, two human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) proteins, US2 and US11, were found to cause the retranslocation of MHC class I molecules from the ER to the cytosol, where they are destroyed by proteasomes (61, 62). In the case of US2, class I molecules were found to associate with a protein (Sec61) present in the channel normally used to translocate newly synthesized proteins into the ER (termed the translocon), leading to the suggestion that the ERAD substrates are delivered to the cytosol by retrograde transport through the Sec61-containing pore (61). Fujita et al. (24) reported that, similar to these findings, the proteasome-specific inhibitor lactacystin (LC) partially blocked CD4 degradation in transfected HeLa cells coexpressing CD4, Vpu, and HIV-1 Env glycoproteins. In the present study, we show that Vpu-induced CD4 degradation can be completely blocked by proteasome inhibitors, does not require the ER chaperone calnexin, but requires the function of the cytosolic polyubiquitination machinery which apparently targets potential ubiquitination sites within the CD4 cytoplasmic tail. Our findings point to differences between the mechanism of Vpu-mediated CD4 degradation and ERAD processes induced by the HCMV proteins US2 and US11 (61, 62).     

In Vivo Identification of Nuclear Factors Interacting with the Conserved Elements of Box C/D Small Nucleolar RNAs

The U16 small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) is encoded by the third intron of the L1 (L4, according to the novel nomenclature) ribosomal protein gene of Xenopus laevis and originates from processing of the pre-mRNA in which it resides. The U16 snoRNA belongs to the box C/D snoRNA family, whose members are known to assemble in ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs) containing the protein fibrillarin. We have utilized U16 snoRNA in order to characterize the factors that interact with the conserved elements common to the other members of the box C/D class. In this study, we have analyzed the in vivo assembly of U16 snoRNP particles in X. laevis oocytes and identified the proteins which interact with the RNA by label transfer after UV cross-linking. This analysis revealed two proteins, of 40- and 68-kDa apparent molecular size, which require intact boxes C and D together with the conserved 5′,3′-terminal stem for binding. Immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the p40 protein corresponds to fibrillarin, indicating that this protein is intimately associated with the RNA. We propose that fibrillarin and p68 represent the RNA-binding factors common to box C/D snoRNPs and that both proteins are essential for the assembly of snoRNP particles and the stabilization of the snoRNA.One of the most interesting recent findings related to ribosome biogenesis has been the identification of a large number of small RNAs localized in the nucleolus (snoRNAs). So far, more than 60 snoRNAs have been identified in vertebrates (17), and more than 30 have been identified in yeast (2). The total number of snoRNAs is not known, but it is likely to be close to 200 (33, 38). These snoRNAs, with the exception of the mitochondrial RNA processing (MRP) species (38), can be grouped into two major families on the basis of conserved structural and sequence elements. The first group includes molecules referred to as box C/D snoRNAs, whereas the second one comprises the species belonging to the box H/ACA family (2, 15).The two families differ in many aspects. The box C/D snoRNAs are functionally heterogeneous. Most of them function as antisense RNAs in site-specific ribose methylation of the pre-rRNA (1, 10, 17, 26); a minority have been shown to play a direct role in pre-rRNA processing in both yeast and metazoan cells (11, 21). The box C/D snoRNAs play their role by means of unusually long (up to 21 contiguous nucleotides) regions of complementarity to highly conserved sequences of 28S and 18S rRNAs (1). In contrast, several members of the H/ACA RNA family have been shown to direct site-specific isomerization of uridines into pseudouridines and to display shorter regions of complementarity to rRNA (14, 24). Mutational analysis suggests that H/ACA snoRNAs can also play a role as antisense RNAs by base pairing with complementary regions on rRNA (15, 24).Another difference between the two families can be seen by comparison of secondary structures. A Y-shaped motif, where a 5′,3′-terminal stem adjoins the C and D conserved elements, has been proposed for many box C/D snoRNAs (16, 26, 40, 42), whereas box H/ACA snoRNAs have been proposed to fold into two conserved hairpin structures connected by a single-stranded hinge region, followed by a short 3′ tail (15).Despite these differences, analogies have been found in the roles played by the conserved box elements. Mutational analysis and competition experiments indicated that C/D and H/ACA boxes are required both for processing and stable accumulation of the mature snoRNA, suggesting that they represent binding sites for specific trans-acting factors (2, 3, 8, 15, 16, 28, 36, 41).All snoRNAs are associated with proteins to form specific ribonucleoparticles (snoRNPs). The study of these particles began only recently, and so far, very few aspects of their structure and biosynthesis have been clarified. The only detailed analysis performed was on the mammalian U3 (19) and the yeast snR30 (20) snoRNPs. Of the identified components, a few appear to be more general factors: fibrillarin, which was shown to be associated with C/D snoRNPs (3, 4, 8, 13, 28, 31, 39), and the nucleolar protein GAR1, which was found associated with H/ACA snoRNAs in yeast (20). Just as the study of small nuclear RNP (snRNP) particles was crucial to the understanding of the splicing process, a detailed structural and functional analysis of snoRNP particles will be essential to elucidate the complex process of ribosome biosynthesis.In this study, we have analyzed the snoRNP assembly of wild-type and mutant U16 snoRNAs by following the kinetics of complex formation in the in vivo system of the Xenopus laevis oocyte. By a UV cross-linking technique, we have identified two proteins, of 40- and 68-kDa apparent molecular mass, which require intact boxes C and D together with the terminal stem for their binding. The 40-kDa species is specifically recognized by fibrillarin antibodies, indicating that this protein is intimately associated with the RNA.