INDUCTION OF NUCLEAR ENVELOPES AROUND METAPHASE CHROMOSOMES AFTER FUSION WITH INTERPHASE CELLS

The process of cellular fusion induced by Sendai virus in Chinese hamster cells (Don line) afforded us the opportunity to study nuclear envelope formation around metaphase sets in the presence of interphase nuclei, when chromosome pulverization failed to occur in such multinucleate cells. Morphologically, the enveloped metaphase chromosomes resembled a normal telophase nucleus, though minor differences prompted us to call it telophase-like. Electron microscopic observations demonstrated that the membranes enveloping the chromosomes appeared to be identical with a normal nuclear envelope. The longer the cells were incubated with Colcemid before fusion, the higher was the number of cells with telophase-like nuclei and the lower the percentage of cells with pulverizations. Furthermore, the number of pulverizations bore a somewhat direct relationship to the ratio of metaphase to interphase nuclei in multinucleate cells, and the number of telophase-like nuclei was inversely proportional to this ratio. A hypothesis is advanced in which a balance between the activities of a chromosome pulverization factor and a nuclear envelope formation factor, the former in metaphase cells and the latter in interphase cells, is decisive as to the nature of morphologic events observed in virus-induced fused cells.     

CONTRAST BETWEEN THE ENVIRONMENTAL pH DEPENDENCIES OF PROPHASING AND NUCLEAR MEMBRANE FORMATION IN INTERPHASE-METAPHASE CELLS

In Chinese hamster Don cells, fusion of an interphase cell with a metaphase cell resulted either in prophasing of the interphase nucleus, including loss of the nuclear envelope (NE), or in the formation of a double membrane around the metaphase chromosomes. Only one of these phenomena occurred in a given interphase-metaphase (I–M) binucleate cell. At pH 7.4, there was about an equal probability that either event could occur amongst the population of I–M cells. The effect of pH changes in the medium containing the fused cells was examined. At pH 6.6, prophasing was the predominant event; at pH 8.0, membrane formation predominated. It was found that the rate of progression of a mononucleate cell from G₂ to metaphase was appreciably faster at pH 6.6 than at pH 8.0. Conversely, the progression from metaphase to G₁ was faster at pH 8.0 than at pH 6.6. These results with the mononucleate cells strengthen the hypothesis that structural changes in I–M cells are reflections of normal mitotic phenomena. Additional evidence for this hypothesis was produced by electron microscope examination after direct fixation in chrom-osmium. The double membrane around the chromosomes of the I–M cell was indistinguishable from the normal NE. The results obtained by varying the pH of the medium containing the fused cells provide an indication that disruption or formation of the NE of Don cells depends on the balance reached between disruptive and formative processes.     

Some comments regarding chromosome pulverization (premature chromosome condensation or PCC, prophasing).

Premature chromosome pulverization (PCC) or prophasing is a much misunderstood cytological entity. It must be separated from chromosome damage caused by a number of chemical, physical and biological agents. Prophasing is observed in fused cells in which one of the constituent cells must be in metaphase and another in interphase. The morphology of the "pulverized" interphase nucleus will depend on the phase of the cell cycle in which the interphase cell was in when exposed to a substance present in the cytoplasm of the metaphase cell leading to "prophasing". Prophasing is a normal cellular phenomenon occurring prematurely or under abnormal conditions (fusion of cells) and its demonstration in human cells or tumors may be indicative of the presence of a virus (or its products) which leads to cell fusion, but does not play a role in prophasing.     

Changes in embryonic 8-cell nuclei transferred by means of cell fusion to mouse eggs.

Metaphase II and activated mouse oocytes were fused with 8-cell blastomeres, and morphological changes in the transferred nuclei were followed using light and electron microscopy. In metaphase II oocytes, blastomere nuclei underwent premature chromosome condensation (PCC) typical for S-phase nuclei: chromatin pulverization. Then an abortive spindle was formed without evident microtubule organizing centers. Blastomere chromosomes condensed to a lesser degree than meiotic chromosomes and lacked mature functional, trilaminar kinetochores. After parthenogenetic activation of these oocytes, blastomere chromosomes followed, in synchrony with oocyte chromatin, a similar route of changes (anaphase, telophase) and then reformed interphase nuclei of the pronuclear type. Remodeling of 8-cell nucleus thus occurred, but the integrity of the chromatin set was frequently disturbed by formation of micronuclei. If blastomere fusion with oocytes was done close to activation (either before or after parthenogenetic stimulation), the chances of remodeling of the nuclei decreased, because PCC was not regularly induced in all oocytes. In hybrids produced 60 min or later after oocyte activation, blastomere nuclei were maintained in interphase without any structural modifications. Multiple experiments in the mouse have shown that the nuclei from 8-cell stage transferred to enucleated oocytes and egg cells are not capable of substituting for pronuclear functions. Possible reasons for impaired functional reprogramming of 8-cell nucleus in the mouse are discussed in light of our present findings on the morphology of nuclei transferred before and after oocyte activation.     

Events associated with the initiation of mitosis in fused multinucleate HeLa cells

Large multinucleate (LMN) HeLa cells with more than 10–50 nuclei were produced by random fusion with polyethylene glycol. The number of nuclei in a particular stage of the cell cycle at the time of fusion was proportionate to the duration of the phase relative to the total cell cycle. The fused cells did not gain generation time. Interaction of various nuclei in these cells has been observed. The nuclei initially belonging to the G1-or S-phase required a much longer time to complete DNA synthesis than in mononucleate cells. Some of the cells reached mitosis 15 h after fusion, whereas others required 24 h. The cells dividing early, contained a larger number of initially early G1-phase nuclei than those cells dividing late. The former very often showed prematurely condensed chromosome (PCC) groups. In cells with a large number of advanced nuclei the few less advanced nuclei could enter mitosis prematurely. On the other hand, the cells having a large number of nuclei belonging initially to late S-or G2-phase took longer to reach mitosis. These nuclei have been taken out of the normal sequence and therefore failed to synthesize the mitotic factors and depended on others to supply them. Therefore the cells as a whole required a longer period to enter mitosis. Although the nuclei became synchronized at metaphase, the cells revealed a gradation in prophase progression in the different nuclei. At the ultrastructural level the effect of advanced nuclei on the less advanced ones was evident with respect to chromosome condensation and nuclear envelope breakdown. Less advanced nuclei trapped among advanced nuclei showed PCC and nuclear envelope breakdown prematurely, whereas mitotic nuclei near interphase or early prophase nuclei retained their nuclear envelopes for a much longer time. PCC is closely related to premature breakdown of the nuclear envelope. Our observations clearly indicate that chromosome condensation and nuclear envelope breakdown are two distinct events. Kinetochores with attached microtubules could be observed on prematurely condensed chromosomes. Kinetochores of fully condensed chromosomes often failed to become connected to spindle elements. This indicates that the formation of a functional spindle is distinct from the other events and may depend on different factors.     

CELL CYCLE-SPECIFIC CHANGES IN HISTONE PHOSPHORYLATION ASSOCIATED WITH CELL PROLIFERATION AND CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION

Preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to examine histone phosphorylation in synchronized Chinese hamster cells (line CHO). Results showed that histone f1 phosphorylation, absent in G₁-arrested and early G₁-traversing cells, commences 2 h before entry of traversing cells into the S phase. It is concluded that f1 phosphorylation is one of the earliest biochemical events associated with conversion of nonproliferating cells to proliferating cells occurring on old f1 before synthesis of new f1 during the S phase. Results also showed that f3 and a subfraction of f1 were rapidly phosphorylated only during the time when cells were crossing the G₂/M boundary and traversing prophase. Since these phosphorylation events do not occur in G₁, S, or G₂ and are reduced greatly in metaphase, it is concluded that these two specific phosphorylation events are involved with condensation of interphase chromatin into mitotic chromosomes. This conclusion is supported by loss of prelabeled ³²PO₄ from those specific histone fractions during transition of metaphase cells into interphase G₁ cells. A model of the relationship of histone phosphorylation to the cell cycle is presented which suggests involvement of f1 phosphorylation in chromatin structural changes associated with a continuous interphase "chromosome cycle" which culminates at mitosis with an f3 and f1 phosphorylation-mediated chromosome condensation.     

Cellular events during sexual development from amoeba to plasmodium in the slime mould Physarum polycephalum

Time-lapse cinematography and immunofluorescence microscopy were used to study cellular events during amoebal fusions and sexual plasmodium development in Physarum polycephalum. Amoebal fusions occurred frequently in mixtures of strains heteroallelic or homoallelic for the mating-type locus matA, but plasmodia developed only in the matA-heteroallelic cultures. These observations confirmed that matA controls development of fusion cells rather than cell fusion. Analysis of cell pedigrees showed that, in both types of culture, amoebae fused at any stage of the cell cycle except mitosis. In matA-heteroallelic fusion cells, nuclear fusion occurred in interphase about 2 h after cell fusion; interphase nuclear fusion did not occur in matA-homoallelic fusion cells. The diploid zygote, formed by nuclear fusion in matA-heteroallelic fusion cells, entered an extended period of cell growth which ended in the formation of a binucleate plasmodium by mitosis without cytokinesis. In contrast, no extension to the cell cycle was observed in matA-homoallelic fusion cells and mitosis was always accompanied by cytokinesis. In matA-homoallelic cultures, many of the binucleate fusion cells split apart without mitosis, regenerating pairs of uninucleate amoebae; in the remaining fusion cells, the nuclei entered mitosis synchronously and spindle fusion sometimes occurred, giving rise to a variety of products. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that matA-heteroallelic fusion cells possessed two amoebal microtubule organizing centres, and that most zygotes possessed only one; amoebal microtubule organization was lost gradually over several cell cycles. In matA-homoallelic cultures, all the cells retained amoebal microtubule organization.     

PROPHASING OF INTERPHASE NUCLEI AND INDUCTION OF NUCLEAR ENVELOPES AROUND METAPHASE CHROMOSOMES IN HELA AND CHINESE HAMSTER HOMO- AND HETEROKARYONS

Fusing human HeLa metaphase cells with HeLa interphase cells resulted within 30 min in either of two phenomena in the resultant binucleate cell: either prophasing of the interphase nucleus or formation of a normal-appearing nuclear envelope around the metaphase chromosomes. The frequency of either occurrence was strongly dependent on environmental pH. At pH's of 6.6–8.0, prophasing predominated; at pH 8.5 nuclear envelope formation predominated. Additionally, the frequencies of the two events in multinucleate cells depended on the metaphase/interphase ratio. When the ratio was 0.33 nuclear envelope formation predominated; when it was 2.0 prophasing predominated. In their general features, the results with fused HeLa cells resembled those reported earlier with fused Chinese hamster Don cells. However, the results provided an indication that between pH 6.6 and 8.0 the HeLa metaphase cells possessed a much greater capacity than the Don metaphase cells to induce prophasing. Fusion of Don metaphase cells with HeLa interphase cells or of Don interphase cells with HeLa metaphase cells at pH 8.0 resulted in nuclear envelope formation or prophasing in each kind of heterokaryon. As in the homokaryons, the frequencies of the two events in the heterokaryons depended on the metaphase/interphase ratio. The statistics of prophasing and nuclear envelope formation in the homo- and heterokaryon populations were consistent with the notion that disruption or formation of the nuclear envelope depends on the balance attained between disruptive and formative processes.     

Timing of events in mitosis

BACKGROUND: Regulation of the major transitions in the cell cycle, such as G1/S, G2/M, and metaphase to anaphase, are increasingly well understood. However, we have a poor understanding of the timing of events within each phase of the cell cycle, such as S phase or early mitosis. Two extreme models of regulation are possible. A "regulator-controlled model" in which the order of events is governed by the activation of a series of cytoplasmic regulators, such as kinases, phosphatases, or proteases; or a "substrate-controlled model" in which temporal regulation is determined by the differential responses of the cellular machinery to a common set of activators. RESULTS: We have tried to distinguish between these two models by examining the timing of both biochemical and morphological events in Xenopus egg extracts during mitosis. Several proteins respond with different delays to the activation of Cdc2. We have found that the timing of phosphorylation is largely unchanged when these proteins are exposed to extracts that have been in mitosis for various periods of time. Similarly, when Xenopus interphase nuclei are added to extracts at different times after the G2/M transition, they undergo all the expected morphological changes in the proper sequence and with very similar kinetics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that during early mitosis (from prophase to metaphase) the timing of biochemical events (such as phosphorylation) and morphological events (such as structural changes in the nucleus) is at least partly controlled by the responses of the substrates themselves to a common set of signals.     

Isolation of chromosome clusters from metaphase-arrested HeLa cells

We have developed a simplified approach for the isolation of metaphase chromosomes from HeLa cells. In this method, all the chromosomes from a cell remain together in a bundle which we call a metaphase chromosome cluster. Cells are arrested to 90–95% in metaphase, collected by centrifugation, extracted with non-ionic detergent in a low ionic strength buffer at neutral pH, and homogenised to strip away the cytoskeleton. The chromosome clusters which are released can then be isolated in a crude state by pelleting or they can be purified away from nearly all the interphase nuclei and cytoplasmic debris by banding in a Percoll^TM density gradient. — This procedure has the advantages that it is quick and easy, metaphase chromatin is recovered in high yield, and Ca⁺⁺ is not needed to stabilise the chromosomes. Although the method does not yield individual chromosomes, it is nevertheless very useful for both structural and biochemical studies of mitotic chromatin. The chromosome clusters also make possible biochemical and structural studies of what holds the different chromosomes together. Such information could be useful in improving chromosome isolation procedures and for understanding suprachromosomal organisation of the nucleus.     

The DNA-based structure of human chromosome 5 in interphase

In contrast to those of metaphase chromosomes, the shape, length, and architecture of human interphase chromosomes are not well understood. This is mainly due to technical problems in the visualization of interphase chromosomes in total and of their substructures. We analyzed the structure of chromosomes in interphase nuclei through use of high-resolution multicolor banding (MCB), which paints the total shape of chromosomes and creates a DNA-mediated, chromosome-region-specific, pseudocolored banding pattern at high resolution. A microdissection-derived human chromosome 5-specific MCB probe mixture was hybridized to human lymphocyte interphase nuclei harvested for routine chromosome analysis, as well as to interphase nuclei from HeLa cells arrested at different phases of the cell cycle. The length of the axis of interphase chromosome 5 was determined, and the shape and MCB pattern were compared with those of metaphase chromosomes. We show that, in lymphocytes, the length of the axis of interphase chromosome 5 is comparable to that of a metaphase chromosome at 600-band resolution. Consequently, the concept of chromosome condensation during mitosis has to be reassessed. In addition, chromosome 5 in interphase is not as straight as metaphase chromosomes, being bent and/or folded. The shape and banding pattern of interphase chromosome 5 of lymphocytes and HeLa cells are similar to those of the corresponding metaphase chromosomes at all stages of the cell cycle. The MCB pattern also allows the detection and characterization of chromosome aberrations. This may be of fundamental importance in establishing chromosome analyses in nondividing cells.     

Mitotic chromosome condensation in the sperm nucleus during post fertilization maturation division in urechis eggs

Changes in the morphology of the sperm nucleus in the egg cytoplasm are mong the immediate events in nucleocytoplasmic interactions during early embryogenesis. Soon after its entrance into the egg cytoplasm, the sperm nucleus of various organisms increases in size with the transformation of condensed chromatin to a diffuse state, resembling the chromatin of an interphase nucleus (2, 13, 15, 16). This is followed by a close association or fusion of male and female pronuclei (2, 13, 15, 16). Cytoplasmic influences on nuclear morphology have also been demonstrated clearly in nuclear transplantation and cell fusion studies (10, 11). Reactivation of the nucleus, such as the transplanted brain nucleus in Xenopus egg cytoplasm or the hen erythrocyte nucleus in interphase cytoplasm of HeLa cells, is accompanied by nuclear enlargement and chromatin dispersion (10, 11). However, premature mitotic-like chromosome condensation takes place in the nuclei of sperm or interphase cells fused with mitotic cells (9, 12). Thus, chromosome dispersion and condensation seem to depend on the state of the cytoplasm in which the nucleus is present. These observations imply that the initial morphological changes in the sperm nucleus after fertilization may very well be dependent on the state of maturation of eggs at the time of sperm entry. Unfertilized eggs of Urechis caupo, a marine echiuroid worm, are stored at the diakinesis stage. These eggs complete maturation division after insemination and this is followed by fusion of male and female pronuclei (5, 8). Therefore, Urechis caupo is a suitable organism in which to study the response of the sperm nucleus to the changing state of the egg cytoplasm during and after postfertilization maturation division.     

Early chromosome condensation without cell fusion. I. Preliminary results with allogeneic and xenogeneic cells.

Early chromatin condensation in interphase cells (G1) of human peripheral blood lymphocytes has been induced without virus or cell fusion by exposure to allogeneic or xenogeneic mitotic cells. The event, although similar in some ways to the phenomenon described as "premature chromosome condensation," "chromosome pulverization," and "prophasing," differs in that it does not require the presence of viruses and cell fusion before mitosis proceeds in the G1 cell. Early chromatin condensation in interphase cells induced by mitotic cells only, consists of chromatids in the early or late G1 phase of the cell cycle that are not pulverized or fragmented at mitosis. Some of the chromosomes are twice as long as the metaphase chromosomes and exhibit natural bands. Almost twice as many of these bands are produced as by trypsin treatment of metaphase chromosomes. The nuclear membrane is intact and nucleoli are present, to which some chromosomes are attached. The DNA content of the precocious chromosomes in G1 is half the amount of the metaphase complement.     

The centriolar cycle in polykaryons containing prematurely condensed chromosomes or telophase-like nuclei]

In fused interphase-mitotic cells, either interphase nuclei are induced to premature chromosome condensation (PCC) or mitotic chromosomes are induced to telophase-like nuclei (TLN) formation. This study concerns structural and functional changes in centrioles of fused cells in which PCC or TLN are induced. Embryonic pig kidney cells were fused using a modified PEG-DMSO-serum method. Cell cycle period of the nuclei was determined before cell fusion using double-labeling autoradiography. Polykaryons containing desirable type of PCC or interphase nuclear combination in TLN were selected on the basis of isotope labeling after being embedded in epon. Selected cells were cut into serial sections and studied under electron microscope. The data obtained showed that centrioles at every interphase period undergo mitotic activation when their nuclei are induced to PCC. They acquire fibrillar halo and form half-spindles. Daughter centrioles at G1, S and G2 periods are also capable of mitotic activation when separated from their mother centriole. Inert centrioles were found in some cells with G1-PCC. When mitotic nuclei are induced to TLN formation, their centrioles also become inactivated. They lose fibrillar halo and mitotic spindles break down. Some mitotic centrioles develop features characteristic of interphase period such as satellites and vacuoles. Induced nuclear and centriolar changes are simultaneous and may be controlled by the same factor. Mitotic factor of mitotic cell partner which induces PCC may also induce interphase centrioles to mitotic activation. Degradation of the mitotic factor leading to TLN formation may also cause the loss of the mitotic activity of centrioles and disorganization of mitotic spindles.     

The presence of amplified regions affects the stability of chromosomes in drug-resistant Chinese hamster cells

The stability of chromosomes carrying amplified CAD (carbamyl phosphate synthetase-aspartate transcarbamylase-dihydroorotase) or DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase) genes was studied in V79 Chinese hamster cell derivatives resistant to PALA (N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate) and MTX (methotrexate), respectively. Cells were maintained in the presence of the selective drugs during the study. In both metaphase chromosomes and interphase nuclei, amplified regions were localized by in situ hybridization. In MTX-resistant cells, the amplification-bearing chromosome moved sluggishly at anaphase and gave rise to bud-shaped formations in interphase nuclei. It is suggested that these buds could eventually separate as micronuclei. In both MTX- and PALA-resistant cells, amplified DNA was observed in micronuclei in interphase and in displaced chromosomes in metaphase. Finally, amplification-bearing dicentric chromosomes were found in both drug-resistant cell lines. Cumulatively, these observations indicate that the presence of the amplified region in a chromosome renders it unstable: chromosomes bearing an amplified region tended to be excluded from cells, and rearrangements were more frequent than in normal chromosomes.     

Do individual allocyclic chromosomes in metaphase reflect their interphase domains?

Summary Individual S phase allocyclic chromosomes have been analyzed in Bloom syndrome lymphocytes, in cells with an r(9), and in hypotetraploid Ehrlich mouse ascites cells treated with 1-methyl-2-benzyl hydrazine. On the basis of the following observations, we conclude that such chromosomes more or less reflect their domains in interphase: (1) The S phase allocyclic chromosomes have the same structure as S phase prematurely condensed chromatin (PCC) in fused cells; in other words they form limited areas of chromatin dots; (2) the allocyclic chromosome is the only chromosome in a metaphase plate which synthesizes DNA simultanneously with interphase nuclei; (3) the size of the allocyclic chromosomes is related to the size of the corresponding metaphase chromosome; and (4) the S phase allocyclic chromosomes resemble closely the chromosome domains in interphase made visible with biotinylated human DNA. A variety of evidence shows that most allocyclic chromosomes are simply left behind in their cycle, which presumably is caused by a deletion or inactivation of a hypothetical coiling center situated on each chromosome arm.     

Fine structure of fusion products from soybean cell culture and pea leaf protoplasts

Protoplasts from pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaves and cultured soybean (Glycine max L.) cells were fused by means of polyethylene glycol and subsequently cultured for one week. Both agglutinated protoplasts and cultured fusion products were examined by electron microscopy. Agglutination occurred over large areas of the plasma membranes. The membrane contanct was discontinuous and irregularly spaced. Many cultured fusion products regenerated cell walls and divided to form cell clusters. Fusion of pea and soybean interphase nuclei occurred in some cells. The detection of heterochromatin typical of pea in the synkaryon, even after division, suggests the cells were hybrids. The cytoplasm of the cells from the fusion products contained both soybean leucoplasts and pea chloroplasts. The chloroplasts had apparently ceased dividing and some showed signs of degenerating. Large multinucleate fusion products developed cell walls but failed to divide.Abbreviations PEG polyethylene glycol - SEM scanning electron microscopy - TEM transmission electron microscopy Supported by National Research Council of Canada, Grant A6304     

Amplification of the Y chromosome in three murine tumor cell lines transformed in vivo by different human prostate cancers

Summary Conventional and molecular cytogenetic analyses of three murine cancer cell lines that had been induced in male athymic mice by the injection of three different human prostate cancer cell lines revealed selective amplification of the Y chromosome. In particular, analysis of metaphase and interphase nuclei by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the mouse Y chromosome-specific DNA painting probe revealed the presence of various numbers of Y chromosomes, ranging from one to eight, with a large majority of nuclei showing two copies (46.5–60.1%). In Interphase nuclei, the Y chromosomes showed distinct morphology, allowing identification irrespective of whether the preparations were treated for 15 min or for 5 h with Colcemid, a chemical known to cause chromosome condensation. However, FISH performed on human lymphocyte cultures with chromosome-specific DNA painting probes other than the Y chromosome did not reveal condensed chromosome morphology in interphase nuclei even after 12 h of Colcemid treatment. Our FISH results indicate that (1) the Y chromosome is selectively amplified in all three cell lines; (2) the mouse Y chromosome number is comparable in both interphase and metaphase cells; (3) the Y chromosome number varies between one and eight, with a large majority of cells showing two or three copies in most interphase nuclei; (4) the condensation of the Y chromosome is not affected by the duration of Colcemid treatment but by its inherent DNA constitution; and (5) the number of copies of the Y chromosome is increased and retained not only in human prostate tumor cell lines but also in murine tumors induced by these prostate tumor cell lines.     

NUCLEAR MEMBRANE FUSION IN FERTILIZED LYTECHINUS VARIEGATUS EGGS

Fusion of apposed nuclear envelopes is frequently seen at telophase during postmitotic reorganization of the nucleus, but only rarely at other times in the cell cycle. We attempted to define an experimental system for studying changes in the nuclear envelope related to the cell cycle by varying the time of pronuclear apposition in fertilized Lytechinus variegatus eggs. This approach was based on the assumption that the period from fertilization to metaphase of the first cleavage division corresponds to the period from telophase to metaphase in the generalized cell cycle. The experimental approach used was to block the movement of the pronuclei with Colcemid and then to release this block at varying times after insemination by photochemically inactivating the Colcemid. The results show that apposed pronuclear envelopes can fuse from soon after insemination until the anticipated time of prometaphase. Fusion occurred in about 3 min as scored by light microscopy and this time did not vary significantly with the time after insemination. The potential for nuclear fusion is not restricted to pronuclei alone since diploid nuclei in binucleate cells could be fused using centrifugation in solutions of Colcemid to bring the nuclei into apposition. It is suggested that the potential for nuclear fusion is not necessarily related to the cell cycle and that modification of the nuclear envelope, possibly by association with chromatin or other fibrous material restricts nuclear fusion in most multinucleated cells.