Behavioral Interaction Between Males of Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) Competing for Females

Male Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) compete with one another for mates. The behavioral interactions between males for mates occur both on and off females. Males winning the first copulation do not exhibit apparent postcopulatory mate-guarding behaviors, and females accept subsequent copulations with losing males soon after separation. The duration of copulation when a second male is present is shorter than when only one male is present. However, females receive sufficient sperm for their life-time female progeny production in copulations disrupted artificially at 10 s (1/5 of the regular copulation duration) under normal noncompetition situations. This suggests that shorter copulations because of male–male competition could still result in adequate sperm transfer. Larger males were not more successful in competition than small males, but male competitive ability decreased with age.     

Fitness consequences of divorce in the azure-winged magpie depends on the breeding experience of a new mate

Sexual conflict in producing and raising offspring is a critical issue in evolutionary ecology research.Individual experience affects their breeding performance,as measured by such traits of provisioning of offspring and engagement in extra-pair copulations,and may cause an imbalance in sexual conflict.Thus,divorce is hypothesized to occur within aged social pairs,irrespective of current reproductive success.This concept was explored in the azure-winged magpie Cyanopica cyanus by investigating the divorce of a social pair and its relationship to their changes in breeding performance with prior experience.Females engaging in extra-pair copulation may intensify sexual conflicts and may be the main reason for divorce.Once divorced,females repairing with an inexperienced male realized higher reproductive success than that repairing with an experienced male;males repairing with an experienced female realized higher reproductive success than that repairing with an inexperienced female.This finding indicates that the fitness consequence of divorce depends on the breeding experience of new mates.Divorced females can obtain more extra-pair copulations,whereas divorced males cannot,when they repair with inexperienced breeders.Divorced females provisioned a brood at lower rates than inexperienced females whereas divorced males had no such difference.It appears that divorced females can obtain an advantage in sexual conflicts with inexperienced mates in future reproduction.Consequently,females are probably more active than males in divorcing their aged mates so as to select an inexperienced male as a new mate.Azure-winged magpies thus provide novel insights into the implicaticns of sexual conflict in birds.     

Female sexual receptivity and male copula guarding during prolonged copulations in the damselflyIschnura senegalensis (Odonata:Coenagrionidae)

Laboratory experiments were conducted to clarify the relationship between female sexual receptivity and male copula guarding inI. senegalensis, a species that copulates for several hours. In insectaries, most copulations were initiated early in the morning, and terminated relatively synchronously between 11 00 and 13 00. Females refused males with wing-flutter display and oviposited alone in the afternoon regardless of copulation events of that morning. Females could sexually receive males only in the morning. Males copulated for several hours until 12 00 after which females could oviposit. To determine whether copulations that last for hours function as male copula guarding or only of sperm displacement, emerged males were kept at various densities and permitted to copulate with virgin and mated females in insectaries. Both with virgin and mated females, “social” (not solitary; 2–4 males / insectary) males initiated copulations early in the morning and always terminated at around 12 00. However, both with virgin and mated females, solitary (one male / insectary) males terminated copulations in the morning. In both cases, duration of copulations did not significantly differ for virgin females and mated females. Therefore, long (several hour) copulation is more likely to function as male copula guarding than as sperm displacement, and duration of copulations is predicted to be shortened when male density is very low.     

Mate discrimination in Littorina littorea (L.) and L. saxatilis (Olivi) (Mollusca:Prosobranchia)

The ability of males of Littorina littorea and L. saxatilis to discriminate between mates of different sex, species and size was examined. In partner choice experiments males of L. littorea had the possibility to initiate a copulation with either a female or a male. The males did not show a preference for either sex. There was therefore no evidence that they could determine the sex of a conspecific prior to copulation. The duration of intrasexual copulation was considerably shorter than for intersexual copulation, both in the field and in laboratory experiments. For the two species, intersexual copulations were far more frequent than intrasexual ones. This can partly be explained by the difference in copulation time.Few interspecific copulating pairs were found on the shore. This may reflect a low interspecific encounter rate rather than a mechanism of species recognition. On all of these occasions, however, the active male was of L. saxatilis. It is argued that selection against precopulatory species and sex recognition is a more likely explanation than an hypothesis that states that the required mutations for precopulatory mate identification has not yet occurred. L. littorea males copulated longer with large than with small females. Copulation time was short with parasitized females, which are sterile or of low fecundity. The allocation of mating effort by males is discussed.     

Female Copulation Calls in Guinea Baboons: Evidence for Postcopulatory Female Choice?

We tested the hypothesis that primate female copulation calls are a form of postcopulatory female choice. We collected data on female sexual swellings, sexual and agonistic behavior, copulation calls and postcopulatory behavioral interactions in a multimale-multifemale captive group of Guinea baboons over a 3-mo period. Males copulated with only a few females, and females copulated with only 1 or 2 different males in the group, suggesting a harem-like mating system similar to that of hamadryas and gelada baboons. Female copulations were most likely to occur at peak sexual swellings and male copulatory success was accounted for by dominance rank and age. Variation in female tendencies to call after copulation is best explained by the copulatory success of the male with which each female copulated the most and by the number of copulating partners. The findings are consistent with predictions that calls are likely to be associated with copulation with preferred males and the risk of sperm competition. The prediction that copulation calls increased the probability of postcopulatory mate guarding is also supported. Taken together, the findings suggest that female copulation calls may play an important role in postcopulatory sexual selection and in particular in the expression of postcopulatory female choice in primate species in which females have little opportunity to choose their mates or female mate choice is costly or both.     

Fertility Advertisement in Birds: a Means of Inciting Male-male Competition?

Certain loud calls made by female red junglefowl and Lapland longspurs are given most frequently immediately after egg laying, when a copulation should have the highest probability of fertilizing the next egg to be laid. In these species there is considerable male-male interaction for access to fertilizable females, and males are attracted to or follow females making these calls. Based on our interpretation of these calls, we develop a general hypothesis to predict the pattern of occurrence of fertility advertisement both within and among bird species. We hypothesize that certain loud calls given by female birds before and during the egg-laying period are designed to advertise fertility and thereby incite male-male competition. This hypothesis predicts that calls advertising female fertility should most often occur soon after an egg is laid (i.e. during the period of highest fertility) but may also occur at any time during the female's fertilizable period. Such calls are unlikely to be given by females in strictly monogamous species (especially those with long-term pair bonds) because in these species each female usually mates with only a single male and extra-pair copulations are avoided. Although reports of loud female calls associated with copulation are rare in the literature, the 18 examples we found (including junglefowl and longspurs) were predominantly (15/18) in species adopting mating systems other than strict monogamy, and these calls were most commonly and disproportionately reported in multi-male mating systems. This form of “estrus” in birds may be widespread because few species appear to be strictly monogamous, but it will be difficult to study because the period of high fertility for female birds is so short.     

Sex‐specific repeatabilities and effects of relatedness and mating status on copulation duration in an acridid grasshopper

In species with direct sperm transfer, copulation duration is a crucial trait that may affect male and female reproductive success and that may vary with the quality of the mating partner. Furthermore, traits such as copulation duration represent the outcome of behavioral interactions between the sexes, for which it is important—but often difficult—to determine which sex is in phenotypic control. Using a double‐mating protocol, we compared copulation durations between (1) virgin and nonvirgin and (2) sibling and nonsibling mating pairs in rufous grasshoppers Gomphocerippus rufus. Nonvirgin copulations took on average approximately 30% longer than virgin copulations, whereas relatedness of mating partners was not a significant predictor of copulation duration. Longer nonvirgin copulations may represent a male adaptation to sperm competition if longer copulations allow more sperm to be transferred or function as postinsemination mate guarding. The absence of differences between pairs with different degrees of relatedness suggests no precopulatory or preinsemination inbreeding avoidance mechanism has evolved in this species, perhaps because there is no inbreeding depression in this species, or because inbreeding avoidance occurs after copulation. Controlling for the effects of male and female mating status (virgin vs. nonvirgin) and relatedness (sibling vs. nonsibling), we found significant repeatabilities (R) in copulation duration for males (R = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.09–0.55) but not for females (R = 0.09; 95% CI: 0.00–0.30). Thus, copulation durations of males more strongly represent a nontransient trait expressed in a consistent manner with different mating partners, suggesting that some aspect of the male phenotype may determine copulation duration in this species. However, overlapping confidence intervals for our sex‐specific repeatability estimates indicate that higher sampling effort is required for conclusive evidence.     

True deception during extra‐pair courtship feeding: cheating whiskered tern Chlidonias hybrida females perform better

Males of many bird species feed their mates during the pre‐incubation period. The food provisioned by males during these courtship feedings (CFs) represents the key source of energy for the female during egg formation. Non‐pair males may trade food for extra pair copulations (EPC) with females during extra pair courtship feeding (EPCF), while females may trade copulations for food with non‐pair males to obtain additional resources. Because EPCs can be costly to the females, they are expected to behave in ways that will deceive non‐pair males to obtain additional resources at no cost to themselves. We investigated EPCFs in whiskered terns Chlidonias hybrida breeding in food‐rich conditions, on carp ponds in southern Poland. Almost all CFs (n = 2751) took place during the female's fertile period and peaked just before clutch initiation. 10% of all CFs were performed by non‐pair males. Females tried to obtain food from the non‐pair male during 39% of EPCFs, by swindling (the female solicits a non‐social male for copulation and tries to swindle food with no cloacal contact) or by snatching (the female tries to take the gift without engaging in copulation). In the remaining 61% of EPCFs, females did not react or chased the visiting male away. The probability of a female's obtaining food during EPCF was much higher (0.69, 95% CI: 0.47–0.85) if she swindled rather than snatched (0.08, 95% CI: 0.02–0.22). Only 0.7% of EPCFs were followed by EPCs. The high availability of food in the study area allows males to perform frequent EPCFs, despite the very low probability of obtaining EPCs. This is the first time that ‘true deception’ during EPCFs has been reported in birds: swindling females obtain food from non‐pair males at no immediate detectable cost to themselves.     

Why do females copulate repeatedly with one male?

For most animals, a small number of copulations is sufficient to fertilize all the eggs that a female will lay at any one time. However, in some species a very high frequency of mating occurs, indicating that individuals copulate many more times than are necessary for fertilization. If copulation behaviour carries costs, then the question arises as to how individuals of both sexes benefit from repeated matings with a single partner. For a male, a high frequency of copulation appears to be advantageous in securing or assuring paternity when his sperm is in competition with those of another male. Since copulation is likely to be as costly for females as it is for males, it is necessary to seek adaptive explanations from the female perspective. Attention is now being focused on why females should copulate repeatedly with a single male.