同位素标记相对和绝对定量技术研究进展

定量蛋白质组学是蛋白质研究的前沿学科。目前常用的定量蛋白质组学研究技术有荧光差异凝胶电泳（DIGE）、同位素亲和标记（ICAT）等。同位素标记相对和绝对定量（iTRAQ）技术是近年来最新开发的一种新的蛋白质组学定量研究技术。结合非凝胶串联质谱技术,该技术可对复杂样本、细胞器、细胞裂解液等样本进行相对和绝对定量研究,具有较好的定量效果、较高的重复性,并可对多达四种不同样本同时进行定量分析。本文对 iTRAQ 技术的原理、实验方法及应用进展进行了综述。     

稳定同位素标记试剂DiART在蛋白质组中的定量特征研究

等重同位素标记方法,如同位素标记相对和绝对定量(iTRAQ),可以对肽段进行化学标记,之后通过质谱分析得到的报告离子的强度信息而实现对肽段的定量.目前,这种标记技术在定量蛋白质组学研究中有广泛应用.DiART也是一种等重同位素标记方法,且与iTRAQ的定量原理类似,但是其化学结构组成与iTRAQ有所不同,因而其定量特征有其独特表现.本研究通过对DiART标记的简单蛋白样品、复杂蛋白样品以及复杂样品中目标蛋白的定量情况进行了分析,从而对DiART的定量特征进行了研究,并同时与iTRAQ进行了比较.结果表明,DiART方法在定量稳定性、准确性及动态范围方面均更具优势.     

iTRAQ技术及其在蛋白质组学中的应用

近年来随着蛋白质组学的迅速发展,其相应的方法学研究也取得了巨大的进步, 一系列新技术融入了蛋白质组学研究中,极大地促进了这门学科的发展.相对和绝对定量同位素标记(iTRAQ)技术与高度敏感性和准确性的串联质谱及多维液相色谱联用技术已成为蛋白质定性和定量研究的主要工具之一. 该技术可对复杂样本、细胞器、细 胞裂解液等样本进行相对和绝对定量研究,具有较好的定量效果、较高的重复性.由于其能够同时对多达8种样品进行标记分析,故在生命科学的各个领域得到了广泛的应用.本文对iTRAQ的原理、实验流程、优缺点及近几年的应用进展进行综述.     

iTRAQ技术在真菌研究中的应用进展

iTRAQ技术是一种新的、功能强大的、可以最多同时比较8种不同样品中蛋白质相对或绝对含量的蛋白质组学方法,结合多维液相色谱和串联质谱分析,iTRAQ技术已成为差异蛋白质组学定量研究的主要工具之一。而真菌的致病作用是多种蛋白质共同参与的真菌?宿主相互作用的复杂过程,因此整体、定量地分析真菌致病过程中的差异表达蛋白质谱,对于研究真菌的致病机制具有重要作用。该文重点就iTRAQ技术在真菌研究中的应用进展进行综述。     

基于质谱的定量蛋白质组学策略和方法研究进展

定量蛋白质组学已经成为组学领域研究的热点之一.相关实验技术和计算方法的不断创新极大地促进了定量蛋白质组学的飞速发展.常用的定量蛋白质组学策略按照是否需要稳定同位素标记可以分为无标定量和有标定量两大类.每类策略又产生了众多定量方法和工具,它们一方面推动了定量蛋白质组学的深入发展;另一方面,也在实验策略与技术的发展过程中不断更新.因此对这些定量实验策略和方法进行系统总结和归纳将有助于定量蛋白质组学的研究.本文主要从方法学角度全面归纳了目前定量蛋白质组学研究的相关策略和算法,详述了无标定量和有标定量的具体算法流程并比较了各自特点,还对以研究蛋白质绝对丰度为目标的绝对定量算法进行了总结,列举了常用的定量软件和工具,最后概述了定量结果的质量控制方法,对定量蛋白质组学方法发展的前景进行了展望.     

定量蛋白质组学无标记定量方法的研究进展

依靠质谱技术的蛋白质组学快速发展,寻求速度快、重复性好以及准确度高的定量方法是该领域的一项艰巨任务,定量蛋白质组学分支领域应运而生．其中,无标记定量方法以其样品制备简单、耗材费用低廉以及结果数据分析便捷等优点渐露锋芒．无标记定量方法通常分为信号强度法和谱图计数法两大类．本文在这两种无标记定量方法计算原理的基础上,针对各种常用的无标记定量方法及最新进展做一个较为全面的介绍,并将详细讨论两类方法的异同点,以及目前蛋白质组学中无标记定量方法所面临的主要挑战,希望能为这一领域的研究人员在选择无标记定量方法时提供一个合理的参考．     

定量蛋白质组学中的同位素标记技术

定量蛋白质组学的目的是对复杂的混合体系中所有的蛋白质进行鉴定,并对蛋白质的量及量的变化进行准确的测定,是当前系统生物科学研究的重要内容。近年来,由于质谱技术和生物信息学的进步,定量蛋白质组学在分析蛋白质组或亚蛋白质组方面已取得了令人瞩目的成就,但其最显著的成就应该归功于稳定同位素标记技术的应用。该技术使用针对某一类蛋白具有特异性的化学探针来标记目的蛋白质或肽段,同时化学探针要求含有用以精确定量的稳定同位素信号。在此基础上,实现了对表达的蛋白质差异和翻译后修饰的蛋白质差异进行精确定量分析。综述了在定量蛋白质组学中使用的各种同位素标记技术及其应用。     

定量蛋白质组学在急性高原病研究中的应用进展

急性高原病(acute mountain sickness,AMS)是人体急性暴露于高原低压低氧环境后出现多系统生理紊乱的临床综合征。定量蛋白质组学技术可以系统定量并描述机体蛋白质组成和动态变化规律,近年来在多种疾病的预防、诊断、治疗和发生机制等方面研究应用广泛。本文系统综述了定量蛋白质组学技术及其在AMS的预防、诊断、治疗和急进高原习服机制研究中的应用进展,以期为AMS的发病机制、提前干预、临床治疗和AMS的蛋白质组学研究提供参考。     

18O标记法在定量蛋白质组学中的应用

基于质谱技术去识别和检测蛋白质表达差异是一个热点,有助于生物过程和体系的分子机制的研究。近年来各种基于质谱技术的定量蛋白质组学研究方法发展较快,相对其他方法而言,18O标记法是一种较为理想、相对容易实现并且在不断完善的体外标记方法,最近在定量蛋白质组学研究中应用较多。现对18O标记法原理、特点以及技术方法的优化和应用进展进行综述。     

定量蛋白质组同位素标记技术及应用

定量蛋白质组学是对蛋白质组进行精确的定量和鉴定的学科,突破了传统蛋白质组研究集中于对蛋白质的分离和鉴定,着重于定性定量解析细胞蛋白质的动态变化信息,更真实地反映了细胞功能、过程机制等综合信息。以同位素为内标的质谱分析新技术的提出,显示出可同时自动鉴定和精确定量的能力,代表了目前定量蛋白质组研究的主要发展方向。对近年来定量蛋白质组学同位素标记技术和应用研究所取得的重要进展以及最新的发展动态进行了综述。     

Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF

A comparative study on the three quantitative methods frequently used in proteomics, 2D DIGE (difference gel electrophoresis), cICAT (cleavable isotope-coded affinity tags) and iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification), was carried out. DIGE and cICAT are familiar techniques used in gel- and LC-based quantitative proteomics, respectively. iTRAQ is a new LC-based technique which is gradually gaining in popularity. A systematic comparison among these quantitative methods has not been reported. In this study, we conducted well-designed comparisons using a six-protein mixture, a reconstituted protein mixture (BSA spiked into human plasma devoid of six abundant proteins), and complex HCT-116 cell lysates as the samples. All three techniques yielded quantitative results with reasonable accuracy when the six-protein or the reconstituted protein mixture was used. In DIGE, accurate quantification was sometimes compromised due to comigration or partial comigration of proteins. The iTRAQ method is more susceptible to errors in precursor ion isolation, which could be manifested with increasing sample complexity. The quantification sensitivity of each method was estimated by the number of peptides detected for each protein. In this regard, the global-tagging iTRAQ technique was more sensitive than the cysteine-specific cICAT method, which in turn was as sensitive as, if not more sensitive than, the DIGE technique. Protein profiling on HCT-116 and HCT-116 p53 -/- cell lysates displayed limited overlapping among proteins identified by the three methods, suggesting the complementary nature of these methods.     

CysTRAQ - A combination of iTRAQ and enrichment of cysteinyl peptides for uncovering and quantifying hidden proteomes

Shotgun proteomics is capable of characterizing differences in both protein quality and quantity, and has been applied in various biomedical applications. Unfortunately, the high complexity and dynamic range of proteins in studied samples, clinical in particular, often hinders the identification of relevant proteins. Indeed, information-rich, low abundance proteins often remain undetected, whereas repeatedly reported altered concentrations in high abundance proteins are often ambiguous and insignificant. Several techniques have therefore been developed to overcome this obstacle and provide a deeper insight into the proteome. Here we report a novel approach, which enables iTRAQ reagent quantitation of peptides fractionated based on presence of a cysteine residue (thus CysTRAQ). For the first time, we prove that iTRAQ quantitation is fully compatible with cysteinyl peptide enrichment and is not influenced by the fractionation process. Moreover, the employment of the method combined with high-resolution TripleTOF 5600 mass spectrometer for very fast MS/MS acquisition in human amniotic fluid analysis significantly increased the number of identified proteins, which were simultaneously quantified owing to the introduction of iTRAQ labeling. We herein show that CysTRAQ is a robust and straightforward method with potential application in quantitative proteomics experiments, i.e. as an alternative to the ICAT reagent approach.     

Isobaric protein and peptide quantification: perspectives and issues

An important challenge for proteomics is the ability to compare protein levels across biological samples. Since their introduction, isotopic and isobaric peptide labeling have played an important role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteomes. One important drawback of most of the isotopic-labeling techniques is an increase in sample complexity. This problem was successfully addressed with the construction of isobaric labeling strategies, such as isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), tandem mass tagging, the cleavable isobaric affinity tag, dimethylated leucines and isobaric peptide termini labeling. Furthermore, numerous applications for multiplexing using iTRAQ and tandem mass tagging have been reported.     

Isobaric protein and peptide quantification: perspectives and issues

An important challenge for proteomics is the ability to compare protein levels across biological samples. Since their introduction, isotopic and isobaric peptide labeling have played an important role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteomes. One important drawback of most of the isotopic-labeling techniques is an increase in sample complexity. This problem was successfully addressed with the construction of isobaric labeling strategies, such as isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), tandem mass tagging, the cleavable isobaric affinity tag, dimethylated leucines and isobaric peptide termini labeling. Furthermore, numerous applications for multiplexing using iTRAQ and tandem mass tagging have been reported.     

Proteomic identification of immunoproteasome accumulation in formalin-fixed rodent spinal cords with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Clinically relevant formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues have not been widely used in neuroproteomic studies because many proteins are presumed to be degraded during tissue preservation. Recent improvements in proteomics technologies, from the 2D gel analysis of intact proteins to the "shotgun" quantification of peptides and the use of isobaric tags for absolute and relative quantification (iTRAQ) method, have made the analysis of FFPE tissues possible. In recent years, iTRAQ has been one of the main methods of choice for high throughput quantitative proteomics analysis, which enables simultaneous comparison of up to eight samples in one experiment. Our objective was to assess the relative merits of iTRAQ analysis of fresh frozen versus FFPE nervous tissues by comparing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE)-induced proteomic changes in FFPE rat spinal cords and frozen tissues. EAE-induced proteomic changes in FFPE tissues were positively correlated with those found in the frozen tissues, albeit with ～50% less proteome coverage. Subsequent validation of the enrichment of immunoproteasome (IP) activator 1 in EAE spinal cords led us to evaluate other proteasome and IP-specific proteins. We discovered that many IP-specific (as opposed to constitutive) proteasomal proteins were enriched in EAE rat spinal cords, and EAE-induced IP accumulation also occurred in the spinal cords of an independent mouse EAE model in a disability score-dependent manner. Therefore, we conclude that it is feasible to generate useful information from iTRAQ-based neuroproteomics analysis of archived FFPE tissues for studying neurological disease tissues.     

Comparative Analysis of Label-Free and 8-Plex iTRAQ Approach for Quantitative Tissue Proteomic Analysis

High resolution proteomics approaches have been successfully utilized for the comprehensive characterization of the cell proteome. However, in the case of quantitative proteomics an open question still remains, which quantification strategy is best suited for identification of biologically relevant changes, especially in clinical specimens. In this study, a thorough comparison of a label-free approach (intensity-based) and 8-plex iTRAQ was conducted as applied to the analysis of tumor tissue samples from non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For the latter, two acquisition strategies were tested including analysis of unfractionated and fractioned iTRAQ-labeled peptides. To reduce variability, aliquots of the same protein extract were used as starting material, whereas to obtain representative results per method further sample processing and MS analysis were conducted according to routinely applied protocols. Considering only multiple-peptide identifications, LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 910, 1092 and 332 proteins by label-free, fractionated and unfractionated iTRAQ, respectively. The label-free strategy provided higher protein sequence coverage compared to both iTRAQ experiments. Even though pre-fraction of the iTRAQ labeled peptides allowed for a higher number of identifications, this was not accompanied by a respective increase in the number of differentially expressed changes detected. Validity of the proteomics output related to protein identification and differential expression was determined by comparison to existing data in the field (Protein Atlas and published data on the disease). All methods predicted changes which to a large extent agreed with published data, with label-free providing a higher number of significant changes than iTRAQ. Conclusively, both label-free and iTRAQ (when combined to peptide fractionation) provide high proteome coverage and apparently valid predictions in terms of differential expression, nevertheless label-free provides higher sequence coverage and ultimately detects a higher number of differentially expressed proteins. The risk for receiving false associations still exists, particularly when analyzing highly heterogeneous biological samples, raising the need for the analysis of higher sample numbers and/or application of adjustment for multiple testing.     

Isobaric Labeling and Data Normalization without Requiring Protein Quantitation

Isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics can complement high-resolution sample isolation techniques. Here, we report a simple workflow exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI)-MW deconvolution (EMMOL) for normalizing isobaric reporter ratios within and between experiments, where small or unknown amounts of protein are used. EMMOL deconvolutes the isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) data to yield the quantity of each protein of each sample in the pool, a new approach that enables the comparison of many samples without including a channel of reference standard. Moreover, EMMOL allows using a sufficient quantity of control sample to facilitate the peptide fractionation (isoelectric-focusing was used in this report), and mass spectrometry MS/MS sequencing yet relies on the broad dynamic range of iTRAQ quantitation to compare relative protein abundance. We demonstrated EMMOL by comparing four pooled samples with 20-fold range differences in protein abundance and performed data normalization without using prior knowledge of the amounts of proteins in each sample, simulating an iTRAQ experiment without protein quantitation prior to labeling. We used emPAI,¹ the target protein MW, and the iTRAQ reporter ratios to calculate the amount of each protein in each of the four channels. Importantly, the EMMOL-delineated proteomes from separate iTRAQ experiments can be assorted for comparison without using a reference sample. We observed no compression of expression in iTRAQ ratios over a 20-fold range for all protein abundances. To complement this ability to analyze minute samples, we report an optimized iTRAQ labeling protocol for using 5 μg protein as the starting material.     

Comparison of 4-plex to 8-plex iTRAQ quantitative measurements of proteins in human plasma samples

Methods for isobaric tagging of peptides, iTRAQ or TMT, are commonly used platforms in mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics. These two methods are very often used to quantitate proteins in complex samples, e.g., serum/plasma or CSF supporting biomarker discovery studies. The success of these studies depends on multiple factors, including the accuracy of ratios of reporter ions reflecting quantitative changes of proteins. Because reporter ions are generated during peptide fragmentation, the differences of chemical structure of iTRAQ balance groups may have an effect on how efficiently these groups are fragmented and thus how differences in protein expression will be measured. Because 4-plex and 8-plex iTRAQ reagents do have different structures of balanced groups, it has been postulated that indeed differences in protein identification and quantitation exist between these two reagents. In this study we controlled the ratios of tagged samples and compared quantitation of proteins using 4-plex versus 8-plex reagents in the context of a highly complex sample of human plasma using ABSciex 4800 MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer and ProteinPilot 4.0 software. We observed that 8-plex tagging provides more consistent ratios than 4-plex without compromising protein identification, thus allowing investigation of eight experimental conditions in one analytical experiment.     

同位素标记相对和绝对定量蛋白组技术研究进展

近年来定量蛋白组学技术迅速发展,目前常用的有双向荧光差异凝胶电泳、同位素亲和标记、15N同位素标记、同位素标记相对和绝对定量和细胞培养条件下稳定同位素标记技术等。同位素标记相对和绝对定量技术以其高通量、高灵敏度、高重复性、高动态检测限和能对各种复杂样品进行相对和绝对定量研究等优势而备受研究者青睐,目前已发展到在同一实验中分析8组样品,增加了实验设计的灵活性。我们就同位素标记相对和绝对定量技术在定量蛋白组史中的地位作用、研究策略,以及在病毒致病机制研究和医药临床相关问题中的应用做简要综述。