Identification of lectin receptors for conserved SARS‐CoV‐2 glycosylation sites

New SARS‐CoV‐2 variants are continuously emerging with critical implications for therapies or vaccinations. The 22 N‐glycan sites of Spike remain highly conserved among SARS‐CoV‐2 variants, opening an avenue for robust therapeutic intervention. Here we used a comprehensive library of mammalian carbohydrate‐binding proteins (lectins) to probe critical sugar residues on the full‐length trimeric Spike and the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS‐CoV‐2. Two lectins, Clec4g and CD209c, were identified to strongly bind to Spike. Clec4g and CD209c binding to Spike was dissected and visualized in real time and at single‐molecule resolution using atomic force microscopy. 3D modelling showed that both lectins can bind to a glycan within the RBD‐ACE2 interface and thus interferes with Spike binding to cell surfaces. Importantly, Clec4g and CD209c significantly reduced SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. These data report the first extensive map and 3D structural modelling of lectin‐Spike interactions and uncovers candidate receptors involved in Spike binding and SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. The capacity of CLEC4G and mCD209c lectins to block SARS‐CoV‐2 viral entry holds promise for pan‐variant therapeutic interventions.     

The SARS‐unique domain (SUD) of SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2 interacts with human Paip1 to enhance viral RNA translation

The ongoing outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) demonstrates the continuous threat of emerging coronaviruses (CoVs) to public health. SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV share an otherwise non‐conserved part of non‐structural protein 3 (Nsp3), therefore named as “SARS‐unique domain” (SUD). We previously found a yeast‐2‐hybrid screen interaction of the SARS‐CoV SUD with human poly(A)‐binding protein (PABP)‐interacting protein 1 (Paip1), a stimulator of protein translation. Here, we validate SARS‐CoV SUD:Paip1 interaction by size‐exclusion chromatography, split‐yellow fluorescent protein, and co‐immunoprecipitation assays, and confirm such interaction also between the corresponding domain of SARS‐CoV‐2 and Paip1. The three‐dimensional structure of the N‐terminal domain of SARS‐CoV SUD (“macrodomain II”, Mac2) in complex with the middle domain of Paip1, determined by X‐ray crystallography and small‐angle X‐ray scattering, provides insights into the structural determinants of the complex formation. In cellulo, SUD enhances synthesis of viral but not host proteins via binding to Paip1 in pBAC‐SARS‐CoV replicon‐transfected cells. We propose a possible mechanism for stimulation of viral translation by the SUD of SARS‐CoV and SARS‐CoV‐2.     

CyDisCo production of functional recombinant SARS‐CoV‐2 spike receptor binding domain

The COVID‐19 pandemic caused by SARS‐CoV‐2 has applied significant pressure on overtaxed healthcare around the world, underscoring the urgent need for rapid diagnosis and treatment. We have developed a bacterial strategy for the expression and purification of a SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) that includes the SD1 domain. Bacterial cytoplasm is a reductive environment, which is problematic when the recombinant protein of interest requires complicated folding and/or processing. The use of the CyDisCo system (cytoplasmic disulfide bond formation in E. coli) bypasses this issue by pre‐expressing a sulfhydryl oxidase and a disulfide isomerase, allowing the recombinant protein to be correctly folded with disulfide bonds for protein integrity and functionality. We show that it is possible to quickly and inexpensively produce an active RBD in bacteria that is capable of recognizing and binding to the ACE2 (angiotensin‐converting enzyme) receptor as well as antibodies in COVID‐19 patient sera.     

Purification and characterization of the receptor‐binding domain of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein from Escherichia coli

SARS‐CoV‐2 is responsible for a disruptive worldwide viral pandemic, and renders a severe respiratory disease known as COVID‐19. Spike protein of SARS‐CoV‐2 mediates viral entry into host cells by binding ACE2 through the receptor‐binding domain (RBD). RBD is an important target for development of virus inhibitors, neutralizing antibodies, and vaccines. RBD expressed in mammalian cells suffers from low expression yield and high cost. E. coli is a popular host for protein expression, which has the advantage of easy scalability with low cost. However, RBD expressed by E. coli (RBD‐1) lacks the glycosylation, and its antigenic epitopes may not be sufficiently exposed. In the present study, RBD‐1 was expressed by E. coli and purified by a Ni Sepharose Fast Flow column. RBD‐1 was structurally characterized and compared with RBD expressed by the HEK293 cells (RBD‐2). The secondary structure and tertiary structure of RBD‐1 were largely maintained without glycosylation. In particular, the major β‐sheet content of RBD‐1 was almost unaltered. RBD‐1 could strongly bind ACE2 with a dissociation constant (K_D) of 2.98 × 10^–8 M. Thus, RBD‐1 was expected to apply in the vaccine development, screening drugs and virus test kit.     

Characterization of the SARS‐CoV‐2 E Protein: Sequence,Structure, Viroporin,and Inhibitors

The COVID‐19 epidemic is one of the most influential epidemics in history. Understanding the impact of coronaviruses (CoVs) on host cells is very important for disease treatment. The SARS‐CoV‐2 envelope (E) protein is a small structural protein involved in many aspects of the viral life cycle. The E protein promotes the packaging and reproduction of the virus, and deletion of this protein weakens or even abolishes the virulence. This review aims to establish new knowledge by combining recent advances in the study of the SARS‐CoV‐2 E protein and by comparing it with the SARS‐CoV E protein. The E protein amino acid sequence, structure, self‐assembly characteristics, viroporin mechanisms and inhibitors are summarized and analyzed herein. Although the mechanisms of the SARS‐CoV‐2 and SARS‐CoV E proteins are similar in many respects, specific studies on the SARS‐CoV‐2 E protein, for both monomers and oligomers, are still lacking. A comprehensive understanding of this protein should prompt further studies on the design and characterization of effective targeted therapeutic measures.     

Infection and transmission of SARS‐CoV‐2 depend on heparan sulfate proteoglycans

The current pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and outbreaks of new variants highlight the need for preventive treatments. Here, we identified heparan sulfate proteoglycans as attachment receptors for SARS‐CoV‐2. Notably, neutralizing antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 isolated from COVID‐19 patients interfered with SARS‐CoV‐2 binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans, which might be an additional mechanism of antibodies to neutralize infection. SARS‐CoV‐2 binding to and infection of epithelial cells was blocked by low molecular weight heparins (LMWH). Although dendritic cells (DCs) and mucosal Langerhans cells (LCs) were not infected by SARS‐CoV‐2, both DC subsets efficiently captured SARS‐CoV‐2 via heparan sulfate proteoglycans and transmitted the virus to ACE2‐positive cells. Notably, human primary nasal cells were infected by SARS‐CoV‐2, and infection was blocked by pre‐treatment with LMWH. These data strongly suggest that heparan sulfate proteoglycans are important attachment receptors facilitating infection and transmission, and support the use of LMWH as prophylaxis against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid suppresses host pyroptosis by blocking Gasdermin D cleavage

SARS‐CoV‐2 is an emerging coronavirus that causes dysfunctions in multiple human cells and tissues. Studies have looked at the entry of SARS‐CoV‐2 into host cells mediated by the viral spike protein and human receptor ACE2. However, less is known about the cellular immune responses triggered by SARS‐CoV‐2 viral proteins. Here, we show that the nucleocapsid of SARS‐CoV‐2 inhibits host pyroptosis by blocking Gasdermin D (GSDMD) cleavage. SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected monocytes show enhanced cellular interleukin‐1β (IL‐1β) expression, but reduced IL‐1β secretion. While SARS‐CoV‐2 infection promotes activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and caspase‐1, GSDMD cleavage and pyroptosis are inhibited in infected human monocytes. SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid protein associates with GSDMD in cells and inhibits GSDMD cleavage in vitro and in vivo. The nucleocapsid binds the GSDMD linker region and hinders GSDMD processing by caspase‐1. These insights into how SARS‐CoV‐2 antagonizes cellular inflammatory responses may open new avenues for treating COVID‐19 in the future.     

Opposing activities of IFITM proteins in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection

Interferon‐induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs) restrict infections by many viruses, but a subset of IFITMs enhance infections by specific coronaviruses through currently unknown mechanisms. We show that SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike‐pseudotyped virus and genuine SARS‐CoV‐2 infections are generally restricted by human and mouse IFITM1, IFITM2, and IFITM3, using gain‐ and loss‐of‐function approaches. Mechanistically, SARS‐CoV‐2 restriction occurred independently of IFITM3 S‐palmitoylation, indicating a restrictive capacity distinct from reported inhibition of other viruses. In contrast, the IFITM3 amphipathic helix and its amphipathic properties were required for virus restriction. Mutation of residues within the IFITM3 endocytosis‐promoting YxxФ motif converted human IFITM3 into an enhancer of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, and cell‐to‐cell fusion assays confirmed the ability of endocytic mutants to enhance Spike‐mediated fusion with the plasma membrane. Overexpression of TMPRSS2, which increases plasma membrane fusion versus endosome fusion of SARS‐CoV‐2, attenuated IFITM3 restriction and converted amphipathic helix mutants into infection enhancers. In sum, we uncover new pro‐ and anti‐viral mechanisms of IFITM3, with clear distinctions drawn between enhancement of viral infection at the plasma membrane and amphipathicity‐based mechanisms used for endosomal SARS‐CoV‐2 restriction.     

Neutralization of SARS‐CoV‐2 by highly potent,hyperthermostable, and mutation‐tolerant nanobodies

Monoclonal anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 immunoglobulins represent a treatment option for COVID‐19. However, their production in mammalian cells is not scalable to meet the global demand. Single‐domain (VHH) antibodies (also called nanobodies) provide an alternative suitable for microbial production. Using alpaca immune libraries against the receptor‐binding domain (RBD) of the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike protein, we isolated 45 infection‐blocking VHH antibodies. These include nanobodies that can withstand 95°C. The most effective VHH antibody neutralizes SARS‐CoV‐2 at 17–50 pM concentration (0.2–0.7 µg per liter), binds the open and closed states of the Spike, and shows a tight RBD interaction in the X‐ray and cryo‐EM structures. The best VHH trimers neutralize even at 40 ng per liter. We constructed nanobody tandems and identified nanobody monomers that tolerate the K417N/T, E484K, N501Y, and L452R immune‐escape mutations found in the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Epsilon, Iota, and Delta/Kappa lineages. We also demonstrate neutralization of the Beta strain at low‐picomolar VHH concentrations. We further discovered VHH antibodies that enforce native folding of the RBD in the E. coli cytosol, where its folding normally fails. Such “fold‐promoting” nanobodies may allow for simplified production of vaccines and their adaptation to viral escape‐mutations.     

NeutrobodyPlex—monitoring SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralizing immune responses using nanobodies

In light of the COVID‐19 pandemic, there is an ongoing need for diagnostic tools to monitor the immune status of large patient cohorts and the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns. Here, we present 11 unique nanobodies (Nbs) specific for the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike receptor‐binding domain (RBD), of which 8 Nbs potently inhibit the interaction of RBD with angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the major viral docking site. Following detailed epitope mapping and structural analysis, we select two inhibitory Nbs, one of which binds an epitope inside and one of which binds an epitope outside the RBD:ACE2 interface. Based on these, we generate a biparatopic nanobody (bipNb) with viral neutralization efficacy in the picomolar range. Using bipNb as a surrogate, we establish a competitive multiplex binding assay (“NeutrobodyPlex”) for detailed analysis of the presence and performance of neutralizing RBD‐binding antibodies in serum of convalescent or vaccinated patients. We demonstrate that NeutrobodyPlex enables high‐throughput screening and detailed analysis of neutralizing immune responses in infected or vaccinated individuals, to monitor immune status or to guide vaccine design.     

An organoid‐derived bronchioalveolar model for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection of human alveolar type II‐like cells

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), which may result in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, and death. The alveolar epithelium is a major target of the virus, but representative models to study virus host interactions in more detail are currently lacking. Here, we describe a human 2D air–liquid interface culture system which was characterized by confocal and electron microscopy and single‐cell mRNA expression analysis. In this model, alveolar cells, but also basal cells and rare neuroendocrine cells, are grown from 3D self‐renewing fetal lung bud tip organoids. These cultures were readily infected by SARS‐CoV‐2 with mainly surfactant protein C‐positive alveolar type II‐like cells being targeted. Consequently, significant viral titers were detected and mRNA expression analysis revealed induction of type I/III interferon response program. Treatment of these cultures with a low dose of interferon lambda 1 reduced viral replication. Hence, these cultures represent an experimental model for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and can be applied for drug screens.     

Interactomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 and human coronaviruses reveal host factors potentially affecting pathogenesis

Host–virus protein–protein interactions play key roles in the life cycle of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2). We conducted a comprehensive interactome study between the virus and host cells using tandem affinity purification and proximity‐labeling strategies and identified 437 human proteins as the high‐confidence interacting proteins. Further characterization of these interactions and comparison to other large‐scale study of cellular responses to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection elucidated how distinct SARS‐CoV‐2 viral proteins participate in its life cycle. With these data mining, we discovered potential drug targets for the treatment of COVID‐19. The interactomes of two key SARS‐CoV‐2‐encoded viral proteins, NSP1 and N, were compared with the interactomes of their counterparts in other human coronaviruses. These comparisons not only revealed common host pathways these viruses manipulate for their survival, but also showed divergent protein–protein interactions that may explain differences in disease pathology. This comprehensive interactome of SARS‐CoV‐2 provides valuable resources for the understanding and treating of this disease.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 Alpha,Beta, and Delta variants display enhanced Spike‐mediated syncytia formation

Severe COVID‐19 is characterized by lung abnormalities, including the presence of syncytial pneumocytes. Syncytia form when SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein expressed on the surface of infected cells interacts with the ACE2 receptor on neighboring cells. The syncytia forming potential of spike variant proteins remain poorly characterized. Here, we first assessed Alpha (B.1.1.7) and Beta (B.1.351) spread and fusion in cell cultures, compared with the ancestral D614G strain. Alpha and Beta replicated similarly to D614G strain in Vero, Caco‐2, Calu‐3, and primary airway cells. However, Alpha and Beta formed larger and more numerous syncytia. Variant spike proteins displayed higher ACE2 affinity compared with D614G. Alpha, Beta, and D614G fusion was similarly inhibited by interferon‐induced transmembrane proteins (IFITMs). Individual mutations present in Alpha and Beta spikes modified fusogenicity, binding to ACE2 or recognition by monoclonal antibodies. We further show that Delta spike also triggers faster fusion relative to D614G. Thus, SARS‐CoV‐2 emerging variants display enhanced syncytia formation.     

TMPRSS2 expression dictates the entry route used by SARS‐CoV‐2 to infect host cells

SARS‐CoV‐2 is a newly emerged coronavirus that caused the global COVID‐19 outbreak in early 2020. COVID‐19 is primarily associated with lung injury, but many other clinical symptoms such as loss of smell and taste demonstrated broad tissue tropism of the virus. Early SARS‐CoV‐2–host cell interactions and entry mechanisms remain poorly understood. Investigating SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in tissue culture, we found that the protease TMPRSS2 determines the entry pathway used by the virus. In the presence of TMPRSS2, the proteolytic process of SARS‐CoV‐2 was completed at the plasma membrane, and the virus rapidly entered the cells within 10 min in a pH‐independent manner. When target cells lacked TMPRSS2 expression, the virus was endocytosed and sorted into endolysosomes, from which SARS‐CoV‐2 entered the cytosol via acid‐activated cathepsin L protease 40–60 min post‐infection. Overexpression of TMPRSS2 in non‐TMPRSS2 expressing cells abolished the dependence of infection on the cathepsin L pathway and restored sensitivity to the TMPRSS2 inhibitors. Together, our results indicate that SARS‐CoV‐2 infects cells through distinct, mutually exclusive entry routes and highlight the importance of TMPRSS2 for SARS‐CoV‐2 sorting into either pathway.     

Genome‐scale metabolic modeling reveals SARS‐CoV‐2‐induced metabolic changes and antiviral targets

Tremendous progress has been made to control the COVID‐19 pandemic caused by the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus. However, effective therapeutic options are still rare. Drug repurposing and combination represent practical strategies to address this urgent unmet medical need. Viruses, including coronaviruses, are known to hijack host metabolism to facilitate viral proliferation, making targeting host metabolism a promising antiviral approach. Here, we describe an integrated analysis of 12 published in vitro and human patient gene expression datasets on SARS‐CoV‐2 infection using genome‐scale metabolic modeling (GEM), revealing complicated host metabolism reprogramming during SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. We next applied the GEM‐based metabolic transformation algorithm to predict anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 targets that counteract the virus‐induced metabolic changes. We successfully validated these targets using published drug and genetic screen data and by performing an siRNA assay in Caco‐2 cells. Further generating and analyzing RNA‐sequencing data of remdesivir‐treated Vero E6 cell samples, we predicted metabolic targets acting in combination with remdesivir, an approved anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 drug. Our study provides clinical data‐supported candidate anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 targets for future evaluation, demonstrating host metabolism targeting as a promising antiviral strategy.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 infection remodels the host protein thermal stability landscape

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is a global threat to human health and has compromised economic stability. In addition to the development of an effective vaccine, it is imperative to understand how SARS‐CoV‐2 hijacks host cellular machineries on a system‐wide scale so that potential host‐directed therapies can be developed. In situ proteome‐wide abundance and thermal stability measurements using thermal proteome profiling (TPP) can inform on global changes in protein activity. Here we adapted TPP to high biosafety conditions amenable to SARS‐CoV‐2 handling. We discovered pronounced temporal alterations in host protein thermostability during infection, which converged on cellular processes including cell cycle, microtubule and RNA splicing regulation. Pharmacological inhibition of host proteins displaying altered thermal stability or abundance during infection suppressed SARS‐CoV‐2 replication. Overall, this work serves as a framework for expanding TPP workflows to globally important human pathogens that require high biosafety containment and provides deeper resolution into the molecular changes induced by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.     

A functional assay for serum detection of antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleoprotein

The humoral immune response to SARS‐CoV‐2 results in antibodies against spike (S) and nucleoprotein (N). However, whilst there are widely available neutralization assays for S antibodies, there is no assay for N‐antibody activity. Here, we present a simple in vitro method called EDNA (electroporated‐antibody‐dependent neutralization assay) that provides a quantitative measure of N‐antibody activity in unpurified serum from SARS‐CoV‐2 convalescents. We show that N antibodies neutralize SARS‐CoV‐2 intracellularly and cell‐autonomously but require the cytosolic Fc receptor TRIM21. Using EDNA, we show that low N‐antibody titres can be neutralizing, whilst some convalescents possess serum with high titres but weak activity. N‐antibody and N‐specific T‐cell activity correlates within individuals, suggesting N antibodies may protect against SARS‐CoV‐2 by promoting antigen presentation. This work highlights the potential benefits of N‐based vaccines and provides an in vitro assay to allow the antibodies they induce to be tested.     

SARS‐CoV‐2 sensing by RIG‐I and MDA5 links epithelial infection to macrophage inflammation

SARS‐CoV‐2 infection causes broad‐spectrum immunopathological disease, exacerbated by inflammatory co‐morbidities. A better understanding of mechanisms underpinning virus‐associated inflammation is required to develop effective therapeutics. Here, we discover that SARS‐CoV‐2 replicates rapidly in lung epithelial cells despite triggering a robust innate immune response through the activation of cytoplasmic RNA sensors RIG‐I and MDA5. The inflammatory mediators produced during epithelial cell infection can stimulate primary human macrophages to enhance cytokine production and drive cellular activation. Critically, this can be limited by abrogating RNA sensing or by inhibiting downstream signalling pathways. SARS‐CoV‐2 further exacerbates the local inflammatory environment when macrophages or epithelial cells are primed with exogenous inflammatory stimuli. We propose that RNA sensing of SARS‐CoV‐2 in lung epithelium is a key driver of inflammation, the extent of which is influenced by the inflammatory state of the local environment, and that specific inhibition of innate immune pathways may beneficially mitigate inflammation‐associated COVID‐19.