Molecular communication between host plant and the fungal tomato pathogenCladosporium fulvum

Host genotype specificity in interactions between biotrophic fungal pathogens and plants in most cases complies with the gene-for-gene model. Success or failure of infection is determined by absence or presence of complementary genes, avirulence and resistance genes, in the pathogen and the host plant, respectively. Resistance, expressed by the induction of a hypersensitive response followed by other defence responses in the host, is envisaged to be based on recognition of the pathogen, mediated through direct interaction between products of avirulence genes of the pathogen (the so-called race-specific elicitors) and receptors in the host plant, the putative products of resistance genes. The interaction between the biothrophic fungusCladosporium fulvum and its only host tomato is a model system to study fungus-plant gene-for-gene relationships. Here we report on isolation, characterization and biological function of putative pathogenicity factors ECP1 and ECP2 and the race-specific elicitors AVR4 and AVR9 ofC. fulvum and cloning and regulation of their encoding genes. Disruption ofecp1 andecp2 genes has no clear effect on pathogenicity ofC. fulvum. Disruption of theavr9 gene, which codes for the race-specific 28 amino acid AVR9 elicitor, in wild type avirulent races, leads to virulence on tomato genotypes carrying the complementary resistance geneCf9. The avirulence geneavr4 encodes a 105 amino acid race-specific elicitor. A single basepair change in the avirulence geneavr4 leads to virulence on tomato genotypes carrying theCf4 resistance gene.     

Prospects for understanding avirulence gene function

Avirulence genes are originally defined by their negative impact on the ability of a pathogen to infect their host plant. Many avirulence genes are now known to represent a subset of virulence factors involved in the mediation of the host-pathogen interaction. Characterization of avirulence genes has revealed that they encode an amazing assortment of proteins and belong to several gene families. Although the biochemical functions of the avirulence gene products are unknown, studies are beginning to reveal the features and interesting relationships between the avirulence and virulence activities of the proteins. Identification of critical virulence factors and elucidation of their functions promises to provide insight into plant defense mechanisms, and new and improved strategies for the control of plant disease.     

Proteases in pathogenesis and plant defence

Plant pathogens deliver a variety of virulence factors to host cells to suppress basal defence responses and create suitable environments for their propagation. Plants have in turn evolved disease resistance genes whose products detect the virulence factors as a signal of invasion and activate effective defence responses. Understanding how a virulence effector contributes to virulence on susceptible hosts but becomes an avirulence factor that triggers defence responses on resistance hosts has been a major focus in plant research. Recent studies have shown that a growing list of pathogen-encoded effectors functions as proteases that are secreted into plant cells to modify host proteins. In addition, several plant proteases have been found to function in activation of the defence mechanism. These findings reveal that post-translational modification of host proteins through proteolytic processing is a widely used mechanism in regulating the plant defence response.     

Trafficking arms: oomycete effectors enter host plant cells

Oomycetes cause devastating plant diseases of global importance, yet little is known about the molecular basis of their pathogenicity. Recently, the first oomycete effector genes with cultivar-specific avirulence (AVR) functions were identified. Evidence of diversifying selection in these genes and their cognate plant host resistance genes suggests a molecular "arms race" as plants and oomycetes attempt to achieve and evade detection, respectively. AVR proteins from Hyaloperonospora parasitica and Phytophthora infestans are detected in the plant host cytoplasm, consistent with the hypothesis that oomycetes, as is the case with bacteria and fungi, actively deliver effectors inside host cells. The RXLR amino acid motif, which is present in these AVR proteins and other secreted oomycete proteins, is similar to a host-cell-targeting signal in virulence proteins of malaria parasites (Plasmodium species), suggesting a conserved role in pathogenicity.     

植物病原物无毒基因及其功能

植物抗病基因与病原物无毒基因产物间直接或间接相互作用导致产生的基因对基因抗性是植物抗病性的重要形式。无毒基因已在多种植物病原物 ,包括真菌、细菌、病毒和卵菌等中得到克隆。绝大多数已克隆无毒基因之间 ,及其与已知蛋白之间 ,均无显著序列同源性。然而 ,多数已克隆植物抗病基因有较高序列一致性 ,产物往往具有相似的结构域。由序列一致性很高的抗病基因产物与没有明显序列同源性的无毒基因产物相互作用 ,介导产生的过敏性细胞坏死和抗病性 ,在产生速度、强度和组织特异性等方面均可能有显著差异。无毒基因具有双重功能 :在含互补抗病基因植物中表现无毒效应 ,而在不含互补抗病基因植物中显示小种、菌株、致病型、或种特异性毒性效应     

miRNA介导植物-微生物互作中的调控作用及其研究进展北大核心CSCD

微生物与植物之间存在错综复杂的双向交流和串扰,植物与病原微生物互作直接影响寄主植物的生存状况,而植物和益生微生物互作则有利于宿主的生长和健康,共生微生物也会从中受益。不管是病原微生物还是有益微生物进入植物体内,植物miRNA都会迅速做出响应,同时微生物也可以产生miRNA样RNA(miRNA-likeRNA,milRNA)影响植物健康,可见miRNA(或milRNA)是植物与微生物互作过程中迅速响应的重要媒介分子,其内在机制研究近年来取得了许多进展。文中概述了植物-病原微生物、植物-益生微生物互作中miRNA的调控作用,重点阐述了植物miRNA在植物-病原微生物互作过程中对寄主植物抗病性的调控作用和植物-益生微生物互作过程中对宿主植物生长发育及代谢的调控,以及真菌milRNA对寄主植物的跨界调控作用。     

Plant-nematode interactions

Root-knot nematodes and cyst nematodes are obligate, biotrophic pathogens of numerous plant species. These organisms cause dramatic changes in the morphology and physiology of their hosts. The molecular characterization of induced plant genes has provided insight into the plant processes that are usurped by nematodes as they establish their specialized feeding cells. Recently, several gene products have been identified that are secreted by the nematode during parasitism. The corresponding genes have strong similarity to microbial genes or to genes that are found in nematodes that parasitize animals. New information on host resistance genes and nematode virulence genes provides additional insight into this complex interaction.     

A family of serine proteases of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis: chpC plays a role in colonization of the host plant tomato

Genes for seven putative serine proteases (ChpA–ChpG) belonging to the trypsin subfamily and homologous to the virulence factor pat-1 were identified on the chromosome of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis ( Cmm ) NCPPB382. All proteases have signal peptides indicating export of these proteins. Their putative function is suggested by two motifs and an aspartate residue typical for serine proteases. Furthermore, six cysteine residues are located at conserved positions. The genes are clustered in a chromosomal region of about 50 kb with a significantly lower G + C content than common for Cmm . The genes chpA , chpB and chpD are pseudogenes as they contain frame shifts and/or in-frame stop codons. The genes chpC and chpG were inactivated by the insertion of an antibiotic resistance cassette. The chpG mutant was not impaired in virulence. However, in planta the titre of the chpC mutant was drastically reduced and only weak disease symptoms were observed. Complementation of the chpC mutant by the wild-type allele restored full virulence. ChpC is the first chromosomal gene of Cmm identified so far that affects the interaction of the pathogen with the host plant.     

Induction and suppression of gene silencing in plants by nonviral microbes

Gene silencing is a conserved mechanism in eukaryotes that dynamically regulates gene expression. In plants, gene silencing is critical for development and for maintenance of genome integrity. Additionally, it is a critical component of antiviral defence in plants, nematodes, insects, and fungi. To overcome gene silencing, viruses encode effectors that suppress gene silencing. A growing body of evidence shows that gene silencing and suppression of silencing are also used by plants during their interaction with nonviral pathogens such as fungi, oomycetes, and bacteria. Plant–pathogen interactions involve trans-kingdom movement of small RNAs into the pathogens to alter the function of genes required for their development and virulence. In turn, plant-associated pathogenic and nonpathogenic microbes also produce small RNAs that move trans-kingdom into host plants to disrupt pathogen defence through silencing of plant genes. The mechanisms by which these small RNAs move from the microbe to the plant remain poorly understood. In this review, we examine the roles of trans-kingdom small RNAs and silencing suppressors produced by nonviral microbes in inducing and suppressing gene silencing in plants. The emerging model is that gene silencing and suppression of silencing play critical roles in the interactions between plants and their associated nonviral microbes.     

Plant parasitic nematode proteins and the host parasite interaction.

This review focuses on the proteins and secretions of sedentary plant parasitic nematodes potentially important for plant-nematode interactions. These nematodes are well equipped for parasitism of plants. Having acquired the ability to manipulate fundamental aspects of plant biology, they are able to hijack host-cell development to make their feeding site. They feed exclusively from feeding sites as they complete their life cycle, satisfying their nutritional demands for development and reproduction. Biochemical and genomic approaches have been used successfully to identify a number of nematode parasitism genes. So far, 65 204 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) have been generated for six Meloidogyne species and sequencing projects, currently in progress, will underpin genomic comparisons of Meloidogyne spp. with sequences of other pathogens and generate genechip microarrays to undertake profiling studies of up- and down-regulated genes during the infection process. RNA interference provides a molecular genetic tool to study gene function in parasitism. These methods should provide new data to help our understanding of how parasitic nematodes infect their hosts, leading to the identification of novel pathogenicity genes.     

Arabidopsis RIN4 negatively regulates disease resistance mediated by RPS2 and RPM1 downstream or independent of the NDR1 signal modulator and is not required for the virulence functions of bacterial type III effectors AvrRpt2 or AvrRpm1

Bacterial pathogens deliver type III effector proteins into the plant cell during infection. On susceptible (r) hosts, type III effectors can contribute to virulence. Some trigger the action of specific disease resistance (R) gene products. The activation of R proteins can occur indirectly via modification of a host target. Thus, at least some type III effectors are recognized at site(s) where they may act as virulence factors. These data indicate that a type III effector's host target might be required for both initiation of R function in resistant plants and pathogen virulence in susceptible plants. In Arabidopsis thaliana, RPM1-interacting protein 4 (RIN4) associates with both the Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola 1 (RPM1) and Resistance to P. syringae 2 (RPS2) disease resistance proteins. RIN4 is posttranslationally modified after delivery of the P. syringae type III effectors AvrRpm1, AvrB, or AvrRpt2 to plant cells. Thus, RIN4 may be a target for virulence functions of these type III effectors. We demonstrate that RIN4 is not the only host target for AvrRpm1 and AvrRpt2 in susceptible plants because its elimination does not diminish their virulence functions. In fact, RIN4 negatively regulates AvrRpt2 virulence function. RIN4 also negatively regulates inappropriate activation of both RPM1 and RPS2. Inappropriate activation of RPS2 is nonspecific disease resistance 1 (NDR1) independent, in contrast with the established requirement for NDR1 during AvrRpt2-dependent RPS2 activation. Thus, RIN4 acts either cooperatively, downstream, or independently of NDR1 to negatively regulate RPS2 in the absence of pathogen. We propose that many P. syringae type III effectors have more than one target in the host cell. We suggest that a limited set of these targets, perhaps only one, are associated with R proteins. Thus, whereas any pathogen virulence factor may have multiple targets, the perturbation of only one is necessary and sufficient for R activation.     

Activation of quiescent infections by postharvest pathogens during transition from the biotrophic to the necrotrophic stage

The evolution of bacterial pathogens from nonpathogenic ancestors is marked principally by the acquisition of virulence gene clusters on plasmids and pathogenicity islands via horizontal gene transfer. The flip side of this evolutionary force is the equally important adaptation of the newly minted pathogen to its new host niche. Pathoadaptive mutations take the form of modification of gene expression such that the pathogen is better fit to survive within the new niche. This mini-review describes the concept of pathoadaptation by loss of gene function. In this process, genes that are no longer compatible with the novel lifestyle of the pathogen are selectively inactivated either by point mutation, insertion, or deletion. These genes are called 'antivirulence genes'. Selective pressure sometimes leads to the deletion of large regions of the genome that contain antivirulence genes generating 'black holes' in the pathogen genome. Inactivation of antivirulence genes leads to a pathogen that is highly adapted to its host niche. Identification of antivirulence genes for a particular pathogen can lead to a better understanding of how it became a pathogen and the types of genetic traits that need to be silenced in order for the pathogen to colonize its new host niche successfully.     

Salmonella pathogenicity islands: big virulence in small packages

Reflecting a complex set of interactions with its host, Salmonella spp. require multiple genes for full virulence. Many of these genes are found in 'pathogenicity islands' in the chromosome. Salmonella typhimurium possesses at least five such pathogenicity islands (SPI), which confer specific virulence traits and may have been acquired by horizontal transfer from other organisms. We highlight recent progress in characterizing these SPIs and the function of some of their genes. The role of virulence genes found on a highly conserved plasmid is also discussed. Collectively, these packages of virulence cassettes are essential for Salmonella pathogenesis.     

The role of several multidrug resistance systems in Erwinia chrysanthemi pathogenesis

The role of several multidrug resistance (MDR) systems in the pathogenicity of Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937 was analyzed. Using the blast algorithm, we have identified several MDR systems in the E. chrysanthemi genome and selected two acridine resistance (Acr)-like systems, two Emr-like systems, and one member of the major facilitator super-family family to characterize. We generated mutants in genes encoding for these systems and analyzed the virulence of the mutant strains in different hosts and their susceptibility to antibiotics, detergents, dyes, and plant compounds. We have observed that the mutant strains are differentially affected in their virulence in different hosts and that the susceptibility to toxic substances is also differential. Both Acr systems seem to be implicated in the resistance to the plant antimicrobial peptide thionin. Similarly, the emr1AB mutant is unable to grow in the presence of the potato protein tuber extract and shows a decreased virulence in this tissue. These results indicate that the function of these systems in plants could be related to the specificity to extrude a toxic compound that is present in a given host.     

Inventory and functional analysis of the large Hrp regulon in Ralstonia solanacearum: identification of novel effector proteins translocated to plant host cells through the type III secretion system

The ability of Ralstonia solanacearum strain GMI1000 to cause disease on a wide range of host plants (including most Solanaceae and Arabidopsis thaliana) depends on genes activated by the regulatory gene hrpB. HrpB controls the expression of the type III secretion system (TTSS) and pathogenicity effectors transiting through this pathway. In order to establish the complete repertoire of TTSS-dependent effectors belonging to the Hrp regulon and to start their functional analysis, we developed a rapid method for insertional mutagenesis, which was used to monitor the expression of 71 candidate genes and disrupt 56 of them. This analysis yielded a total of 48 novel hrpB-regulated genes. Using the Bordetella pertussis calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase reporter fusion system, we provide direct biochemical evidence that five R. solanacearum effector proteins are translocated into plant host cells through the TTSS. Among these novel TTSS effectors, RipA and RipG both belong to multigenic families, RipG defining a novel class of leucine-rich-repeats harbouring proteins. The members of these multigenic families are differentially regulated, being composed of genes expressed in either an hrpB-dependent or an hrpB-independent manner. Pathogenicity assays of the 56 mutant strains on two host plants indicate that, with two exceptions, mutations in individual effectors have no effect on virulence, a probable consequence of genetic and functional redundancy. This large repertoire of HrpB-regulated genes, which comprises > 20 probable TTSS effector genes with no counterparts in other bacterial species, represents an important step towards a full-genome understanding of R. solanacearum virulence.     

Gene-for-gene interactions: bacterial avirulence proteins specify plant disease resistance

Resistance of plants to bacterial pathogens is often controlled by corresponding genes for resistance and avirulence in host and pathogen, respectively. Fifty years after discovery of the genetic basis of gene-for-gene interactions, several avirulence and plant resistance genes have been isolated and are being studied on the molecular level. Tremendous progress has been made due to a better understanding of type III secretion systems that are required for bacterial pathogenicity. We are beginning to grasp how the plant actually recognizes bacterial avirulence determinants. The current view is that the bacterium translocates avirulence proteins into the host cell by the Hrp type III secretion system and that recognition occurs in the plant cell.     

Plant susceptibility genes as a source for potyvirus resistance

Virus infection depends on the resources provided by the host plant. A number of host proteins that enable potyvirus infection have been identified. The genes encoding them are called susceptibility genes (S-genes). Loss-of-susceptibility type of resistance is based on S-gene modifications leading to incompatible host–virus interactions. An increasing number of examples show that this is a viable method for resistance breeding. While the recent advancements in genome editing and sequencing have remarkably reduced the technical limitations, we still need to tackle many biological challenges to be able to utilise S-genes for durable and broad range potyvirus resistance to their full extent. Many lessons on functional redundancy between gene family members and durability of the resistance have been learned by studying the naturally occurring recessive resistance based on the interplay between eukaryotic initiation factors eIF4E and eIFiso4E and viral protein genome-linked (VPg). Nevertheless, the outcomes of the S-gene modifications on resistance or any other characteristic of the host plant cannot be predicted. In addition to the genetic background of the host, also the properties of the viral factors affect the efficiency of the resistance and the emergence of resistance-breaking mutations. Many potyviral protein–protein interactions occur in multiprotein complexes. This suggests that the susceptibility factors may interact with viral proteins as a part of multifaceted protein–protein interaction networks. Rather than reviewing exhaustively the S-genes involved in potyvirus infection, my intention here is to discuss in the light of selected examples, the prospects and challenges of the use of potyviral S-genes in resistance breeding.     

The type III effectors of Xanthomonas

A review of type III effectors (T3 effectors) from strains of Xanthomonas reveals a growing list of candidate and known effectors based on functional assays and sequence and structural similarity searches of genomic data. We propose that the effectors and suspected effectors should be distributed into 39 so-called Xop groups reflecting sequence similarity. Some groups have structural motifs for putative enzymatic functions, and recent studies have provided considerable insight into the interaction with host factors in their function as mediators of virulence and elicitors of resistance for a few specific T3 effectors. Many groups are related to T3 effectors of plant and animal pathogenic bacteria, and several groups appear to have been exploited primarily by Xanthomonas species based on available data. At the same time, a relatively large number of candidate effectors remain to be examined in more detail with regard to their function within host cells.