Electroporation and PEG delivery of DNA into maize microspores

Summary The ability to deliver and detect reporter gene activity in maize microspores was tested. Tested expression vectors contained the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene and one of the following promoter-intron combinations: 1) cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV 35S), 2) CaMV 35S + maize alcohol dehydrogenase 1 intron 6 (Adh1-I6), 3) maize alcohol dehydrogenase 1 + intron 1 (Adh1-I1), or 4) maize ubiquitin 1 + intron 1 (Ubiq 1-I1) promoter + intron. The expression vectors were delivered into maize microspores using electroporation or polyethylene glycol (PEG). Both methods were effective for delivering free DNA into microspores. Although all four promoters were active in maize protoplasts, only two promoters were active in maize microspores. The CaMV 35S and the Adh1 promoters did not promote gene expression in maize microspore. The CaMV 35S + Adh1-I6 and Ubiq1-I1 promoters produced high levels of CAT activity in maize microspores.     

A deletion adjacent to the maize transposable element Mu-1 accompanies loss of Adh1 expression.

Insertion of the maize transposable element Mu-1 into the first intron of the alcohol dehydrogenase locus (Adh1) of maize produced mutant Adh1-S3034 with 40% of the wild-type level of protein and mRNA. Continued instability at this locus resulted in secondary mutations with lower levels of protein expression. One of these, Adh1-S3034a, has no detectable ADH1 expression. This paper describes the precise nature of the changes in the Adh1 gene that gave rise to the S3034a allele. The Mu-1 element is still present in the mutant, but Adh1 sequences immediately adjacent to the element are deleted. The deletion starts precisely at the Mu-1 insertion site and extends 74 bp leftward removing part of the first intron, the intron:exon junction and 2 bp of the eleventh amino acid codon in the first exon of the gene. Tests for reversion within the somatic tissue of plants show that mutant S3034a, unlike its progenitor, is stably null for ADH1 activity.     

The effect of different promoter-sequences on transient expression of gus reporter gene in cultured barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cells

The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (35S) and the enhanced 35S (E35S) promoters fused with maize alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1) intron1 or maize shrunken locus (sh1) intronl along with maize Adh1 and rice actin (Act1) promoters fused to their respective first introns were tested for transient expression of the E.coli -glucuronidase (gus) reporter gene in cultured barley (Hordeum vulgare L) cells. The plasmids, carrying the respective promoterintron combinations to drive the gus fused to nopaline synthase (nos) terminator, were introduced into cultured barley cells using a particle gun. The rice Act1 promoter with its first intron gave the highest expression of all promoter intron combinations studied. This was followed by the E35S promoter and no significant differences were observed between the other two promoters tested. The rice actin promoter is now being used to drive selectable marker genes to obtain stably transformed cereal cells.NRCC No. 36482     

Intron-mediated enhancement of gene expression in maize (Zea mays L.) and bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.)

We report a strength comparison of a large variety of monocot and dicot intron-containing fragments inserted in the 5 untranslated leader, between the CaMV 35S promoter and the uidA gene (coding for the ß-glucuronidase: GUS). Relative strengths of the intron-containing fragments were evaluated by comparing transient GUS expression after particle bombardment in embryogenic maize and bluegrass suspension cultures. Our results confirm a dramatic dependence on the presence of an intron for chimeric gene expression in both species. On average, the maize first intron of ubi1 provided the highest enhancement of gene expression in maize and bluegrass (71- and 26-fold enhancement, respectively). Half of the introns tested affected gene expression differently in bluegrass and maize. This suggests that the intron-mediated enhancement of gene expression generally obtained with maize may not be fully applicable to all monocots. We also report enhancement of gene expression (92-fold) in a monocot species by a dicot intron (chsA intron).     

Transient gene expression after electroporation of protoplasts derived from embryogenic maize callus

Protoplasts isolated from embryogenic callus cultures derived from immature embryos ofZea mays L. are suitable for analysis of transient gene expression using electroporation-mediated DNA transfer. Expression of introduced genes is comparable to the levels obtained with protoplasts from Black Mexican Sweet suspension cultures. Two different promoters, that directing synthesis of the 35S RNA of cauliflower mosaic virus and the maizeAdh1 promoter were placed in front of the luciferase reporter gene to assess protoplast gene expression and the impact of an intron on expression level.Abbreviations 35S promoter isolated from CaMV - CaMV cauliflower mosaic virus - Adh1 maize gene encoding Alcohol dehydrogenase-1 enzyme - BMS suspension cultures of the Black Mexican Sweet maize variety     

Intron-mediated enhancement of heterologous gene expression in maize

Chimeric genes containing the coding sequence for bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) have been introduced by electroporation into maize protoplasts (Black Mexican Sweet) and transient expression monitored by enzyme assays. Levels of CAT expression were enhanced 12-fold and 20-fold respectively by the inclusion of maize alcohol dehydrogenase-1 introns 2 and 6 in the chimeric construct. This enhancement was seen when the intron was placed within the 5 translated region but not when it was located upstream of the promoter or within the 3 untranslated region. Deletion of exon sequences adjacent to intron 2 abolished its ability to mediate enhancement of CAT gene expression. Northern analysis of protoplasts electroporated with intron constructs revealed elevated levels of CAT mRNA. However, this elevation was insufficient to account for the increased enzyme activity. One explanation of these results is that splicing affects both the quantity of mRNA.