Polymerase matters: non-proofreading enzymes inflate fungal community richness estimates by up to 15 %

Rare taxa overwhelm metabarcoding data generated using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Low frequency Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) may be artifacts generated by PCR-amplification errors resulting from polymerase mispairing. We analyzed two Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) MiSeq libraries generated with proofreading (ThermoScientific Phusion^®) and non-proofreading (ThermoScientific Phire^®) polymerases from the same MiSeq reaction, the same samples, using the same DNA tags, and with two different clustering methods to evaluate the effect of polymerase and clustering tool choices on the estimates of richness, diversity and community composition. Our data show that, while the overall communities are comparable, OTU richness is exaggerated by the use of the non-proofreading polymerase–up to 15 % depending on the clustering method, and on the threshold of low frequency OTU removal. The overestimation of richness also consistently led to underestimation of community evenness, a result of increase in the low frequency OTUs. Stringent thresholds of eliminating the rare reads remedy this issue; exclusion of reads that occurred ≤10 times reduced overestimated OTU numbers to <0.3 %. As a result of these findings, we strongly recommend the use of proofreading polymerases to improve the data integrity as well as the use of stringent culling thresholds for rare sequences to minimize overestimation of community richness.     

Chlamydophila pneumoniae endonuclease IV prefers to remove mismatched 3′ ribonucleotides: Implication in proofreading mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotides in short-patch repair synthesis

DNA polymerase I (DNApolI) catalyzes DNA synthesis during Okazaki fragment maturation, base excision repair, and nucleotide excision repair. Some bacterial DNApolIs are deficient in 3′–5′ exonuclease, which is required for removing an incorrectly incorporated 3′-terminal nucleotide during DNA elongation by DNA polymerase activity. The key amino acid residues in the exonuclease center of Chlamydophila pneumoniae DNApolI (CpDNApolI) are naturally mutated, resulting in the loss of 3′–5′ exonuclease. Hence, the manner by which CpDNApolI proofreads the incorrectly incorporated nucleotide during DNA synthesis warrants clarification. C. pneumoniae encodes three 3′–5′ exonuclease activities: one endonuclease IV and two homologs of the epsilon subunit of replicative DNA polymerase III. The three proteins were biochemically characterized using single- and double-stranded DNA substrate. Among them, C. pneumoniae endonuclease IV (CpendoIV) possesses 3′–5′ exonuclease activity that prefers to remove mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotides in the nick, gap, and 3′ recess of a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Finally, we reconstituted the proofreading reaction of the mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotide using the dsDNA with a nick or 3′ recess as substrate. Upon proofreading of the mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotide by CpendoIV, CpDNApolI can correctly reincorporate the matched nucleotide and the nick is further sealed by DNA ligase. Based on our biochemical results, we proposed that CpendoIV was responsible for proofreading the replication errors of CpDNApolI.     

Differences in replication of a DNA template containing an ethyl phosphotriester by T4 DNA polymerase and Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I

A DNA template containing a single ethyl phosphotriester was replicated in vitro by the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase and by Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (DNA pol I). Escherichia coli DNA pol I bypassed the lesion efficiently, but partial inhibition was observed for T4 DNA polymerase. The replication block produced by the ethyl phosphotriester was increased at low dNTP concentrations and for a mutant T4 DNA polymerase with an antimutator phenotype, increased proofreading activity, and reduced ability to bind DNA in the polymerase active center. These observations support a model in which an ethyl phosphotriester impedes primer elongation by T4 DNA polymerase by decreasing formation of the ternary DNA polymerase–DNA–dNTP complex. When primer elongation is not possible, proofreading becomes the favored reaction. Apparent futile cycles of nucleotide incorporation and proofreading, the idling reaction, were observed at the site of the lesion. The replication block was overcome by higher dNTP concentrations. Thus, ethyl phosphotriesters may be tolerated in vivo by the up-regulation of dNTP biosynthesis that occurs during the cellular checkpoint response to blocked DNA replication forks.     

DNA polymerase proofreading: Multiple roles maintain genome stability

DNA polymerase proofreading is a spell-checking activity that enables DNA polymerases to remove newly made nucleotide incorporation errors from the primer terminus before further primer extension and also prevents translesion synthesis. DNA polymerase proofreading improves replication fidelity ∼ 100-fold, which is required by many organisms to prevent unacceptably high, life threatening mutation loads. DNA polymerase proofreading has been studied by geneticists and biochemists for > 35 years. A historical perspective and the basic features of DNA polymerase proofreading are described here, but the goal of this review is to present recent advances in the elucidation of the proofreading pathway and to describe roles of DNA polymerase proofreading beyond mismatch correction that are also important for maintaining genome stability.     

The implications of using mutagenic primers in combination with Taq polymerase having proofreading activity.

Polymerases with proofreading activity provide high fidelity PCR amplifications. In this study we examined the consequences of using a Taq polymerase with proofreading activity, such as Optimase Taq polymerase, in combination with 4 different mutagenic reverse primers for the amplification of a 345-bp FII PCR product. The amplifications were performed with Optimase Taq polymerase (Transgenomic), and Taq DNA polymerase-recombinant (Invitrogen), without proofreading activity. Mutation screening was carried out by DHPLC and restriction fragment analysis. The usage of Optimase Taq polymerase results in complete reversion of the first and second mutated nucleotide introduced at the 3' end of the mutagenic reverse primer. It also partially reverses the missense nucleotide introduced in the third position of the mutagenic primer and leads to misleading DHPLC and restriction fragment analysis patterns. Nevertheless it cannot perform such an activity when an abnormal nucleotide is introduced in the fourth position.     

A new thermostable DNA polymerase mixture for efficient amplification of long DNA fragments

The thermostable DNA polymerases have been used for amplification of DNA fragments since the invention of PCR. The constraint on the maximum size of the amplified fragments can be solved to certain level by the use of unbalanced mixtures of non-proofreading and proofreading thermostable DNA polymerases. In this study, we tested the use of a mixtures of N-terminal deletional variant of Taq polymerase—Klentaq278 and Tne polymerase from Thermotoga neapolitana. Klentaq278 and Tne polymerase genes were cloned and expressed in different expression vectors under tac promoter. The most efficient ratio of Klentaq278/Tne polymerase for amplification was 10: 1. The polymerase mixture of Klentaq278 and Tne polymerase is very effective in amplification of DNA fragments for up to 8 kb and is useful addition to a DNA polymerases used in long-range PCR.     

Characterization of the 3' exonuclease subunit DP1 of Methanococcus jannaschii replicative DNA polymerase D

The B-subunits associated with the replicative DNA polymerases are conserved from Archaea to humans, whereas the corresponding catalytic subunits are not related. The latter belong to the B and D DNA polymerase families in eukaryotes and archaea, respectively. Sequence analysis places the B-subunits within the calcineurin-like phosphoesterase superfamily. Since residues implicated in metal binding and catalysis are well conserved in archaeal family D DNA polymerases, it has been hypothesized that the B-subunit could be responsible for the 3′-5′ proofreading exonuclease activity of these enzymes. To test this hypothesis we expressed Methanococcus jannaschii DP1 (MjaDP1), the B-subunit of DNA polymerase D, in Escherichia coli, and demonstrate that MjaDP1 functions alone as a moderately active, thermostable, Mn²⁺-dependent 3′-5′ exonuclease. The putative polymerase subunit DP2 is not required. The nuclease activity is strongly reduced by single amino acid mutations in the phosphoesterase domain indicating the requirement of this domain for the activity. MjaDP1 acts as a unidirectional, non-processive exonuclease preferring mispaired nucleotides and single-stranded DNA, suggesting that MjaDP1 functions as the proofreading exonuclease of archaeal family D DNA polymerase.     

PCR-DGGE Comparison of Bacterial Community Structure in Fresh and Archived Soils Sampled along a Chihuahuan Desert Elevational Gradient

The polymerase chain reaction coupled with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) has been used widely to determine species richness and structure of microbial communities in a variety of environments. Researchers commonly archive soil samples after routine chemical or microbial analyses, and applying PCR-DGGE technology to these historical samples offers evaluation of long-term patterns in bacterial species richness and community structure that was not available with previous technology. However, use of PCR-DGGE to analyze microbial communities of archived soils has been largely unexplored. To evaluate the stability of DGGE patterns in archived soils in comparison with fresh soils, fresh and archived soils from five sites along an elevational gradient in the Chihuahuan Desert were compared using PCR-DGGE of 16S rDNA. DNA from all archived samples was extracted reliably, but DNA in archived soils collected from a closed-canopy oak forest site could not be amplified. DNA extraction yields were lower for most archived soils, but minimal changes in bacterial species richness and structure due to archiving were noted in bacterial community profiles from four sites. Use of archived soils to determine long-term changes in bacterial community structure via PCR-DGGE appears to be a viable option for addressing microbial community dynamics for particular ecosystems or landscapes.