Regulation of hematopoiesis and the hematopoietic stem cell niche by Wnt signaling pathways

Hematopoietic stem cells （HSCs） are a rare population of cells that are responsible for life-long generation of blood cells of all lineages. In order to maintain their numbers, HSCs must establish a balance between the opposing cell fates of self-renewal （in which the ability to function as HSCs is retained） and initiation of hematopoietic differentiation. Multiple signaling pathways have been implicated in the regulation of HSC cell fate. One such set of pathways are those activated by the Wnt family of ligands. Wnt signaling pathways play a crucial role during embryogenesis and deregulation of these pathways has been implicated in the formation of solid tumors. Wnt signaling also plays a role in the regulation of stem cells from multiple tissues, such as embryonic, epidermal, and intestinal stem cells. However, the function of Wnt signaling in HSC biology is still controversial. In this review, we will discuss the basic characteristics of the adult HSC and its regulatory microenvironment, the ＂niche＂, focusing on the regulation of the HSC and its niche by the Wnt signaling pathways.     

Different roles of TGF-β in the multi-lineage differentiation of stem cells

Stem cells are a population of cells that has infinite or long-term self-renewal ability and can produce various kinds of descendent cells.Transforming growth factor β(TGF-β) family is a superfamily of growth factors,including TGF-β1,TGF-β2 and TGF-β3,bone morphogenetic proteins,activin/inhibin,and some other cytokines such as nodal,which plays very important roles in regulating a wide variety of biological processes,such as cell growth,differentiation,cell death.TGF-β,a pleiotropic cytokine,has been proved to be differentially involved in the regulation of multi-lineage differentiation of stem cells,through the Smad pathway,non-Smad pathways including mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways,phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/AKT pathways and Rholike GTPase signaling pathways,and their cross-talks.For instance,it is generally known that TGF-β promotes the differentiation of stem cells into smooth muscle cells,immature cardiomyocytes,chondrocytes,neurocytes,hepatic stellate cells,Th17 cells,and dendritic cells.However,TGF-β inhibits the differentiation of stem cells into myotubes,adipocytes,endothelial cells,and natural killer cells.Additionally,TGF-β can provide competence for early stages of osteoblastic differentiation,but at late stages TGF-β acts as an inhibitor.The three mammalian isoforms(TGF-β1,2 and 3) have distinct but overlapping effects on hematopoiesis.Understanding the mechanisms underlying the regulatory effect of TGF-β in the stem cell multi-lineage differentiation is of importance in stem cell biology,and will facilitate both basic research and clinical applications of stem cells.In this article,we discuss the current status and progress in our understanding of different mechanisms by which TGF-β controls multi-lineage differentiation of stem cells.     

Advances in cell lineage reprogramming

As a milestone breakthrough of stem cell and regenerative medicine in recent years,somatic cell reprogramming has opened up new applications of regenerative medicine by breaking through the ethical shackles of embryonic stem cells.However,induced pluripotent stem(iPS) cells are prepared with a complicated protocol that results in a low reprogramming rate.To obtain differentiated target cells,iPS cells and embryonic stem cells still need to be induced using step-by-step procedures.The safety of induced target cells from iPS cells is currently a further concerning matter.More broadly conceived is lineage reprogramming that has been investigated since 1987.Adult stem cell plasticity,which triggered interest in stem cell research at the end of the last century,can also be included in the scope of lineage reprogramming.With the promotion of iPS cell research,lineage reprogramming is now considered as one of the most promising fields in regenerative medicine,will hopefully lead to customized,personalized therapeutic options for patients in the future.     

Control of stem cell fate by engineering their micro and nanoenvironment

Stem cells are capable of long-term self-renewal and differentiation into specialised cell types, making them an ideal candidate for a cell source for regenerative medicine. The control of stem cell fate has become a major area of interest in the field of regenerative medicine and therapeutic intervention. Conventional methods of chemically inducing stem cells into specific lineages is being challenged by the advances in biomaterial technology, with evidence highlighting that material properties are capable of driving stem cell fate. Materials are being designed to mimic the clues stem cells receive in their in vivo stem cell niche including topographical and chemical instructions. Nanotopographical clues that mimic the extracellular matrix(ECM) in vivo have shown to regulate stem cell differentiation. The delivery of ECM components on biomaterials in the form of short peptides sequences has also proved successful in directing stem cell lineage. Growth factors responsible for controlling stem cell fate in vivo have also been delivered via biomaterials to provide clues to determine stem cell differentiation. An alternative approach to guide stem cells fate is to provide genetic clues including delivering DNA plasmids and small interfering RNAs via scaffolds. This review, aims to provide an overview of the topographical, chemical and molecular clues that biomaterials can provide to guide stem cell fate. The promising features and challenges of such approaches will be highlighted, to provide directions for future advancements in this exciting area of stem cell translation for regenerative medicine.     

Functional ion channels in stem cells

Bioelectrical signals generated by ion channels play crucial roles in excitation genesis and impulse conduction in excitable cells as well as in cell proliferation,migration and apoptosis in proliferative cells.Recent studies have demonstrated that multiple ion channels are heterogeneously present in different stem cells;however,patterns and phenotypes of ion channels are species-and/or origin-dependent.This editorial review focuses on the recent findings related to the expression of functional ion channels and the roles of these channels in regulation of cell proliferation in stem cells.Additional effort is required in the future to clarify the ion channel expression in different types of stem cells;special attention should be paid to the relationship between ion channels and stem cell proliferation,migration and differentiation.     

Hsp83 regulates the fate of germline stem cells in Drosophila ovary

正In adult tissues,stem cells are defined by their unique capacity to self-renew and produce differentiated cells to maintain tissue homeostasis.Drosophila ovarian germline stem cells(GSCs)provide a powerful model for investigating the regulatory mechanisms underlying stem cell fate determination in vivo(Chen and Mckearin,     

The Drosophila ovary: an active stem cell community

Only a small number of cells in adult tissues (the stem cells) possess the ability to self-renew at every cell division,while producing differentiating daughter cells to maintain tissue homeostasis for an organism's lifetime.The Drosophilaovary harbors three different types of stem cell populations (germline stem cell (GSC),somatic stem cell (SSC) andescort stem cell (ESC)) located in a simple anatomical structure known as germarium,rendering it one of the best modelsystems for studying stem cell biology due to reliable stem cell identification and available sophisticated genetic toolsfor manipulating gene functions.Particularly,the niche for the GSC is among the first and best studied ones,and studieson the GSC and its niche have made many unique contributions to a better understanding of relationships between stemcells and their niche.So far,both the GSC and the SSC have been shown to be regulated by extrinsic factors originatingfrom their niche and intrinsic factors functioning within.Multiple signaling pathways are required for controlling GSCand SSC self-renewal and differentiation,which provide unique opportunities to investigate how multiple signals fromthe niche are interpreted in the stem cell.Since the Drosophila ovary contains three types of stem cells,it also providesoutstanding opportunities to study how multiple stem cells in a given tissue work collaboratively to contribute to tissuefunction and maintenance.This review highlights recent major advances in studying Drosophila ovarian stem cells andalso discusses future directions and challenges.     

Importance of the stem cell microenvironment for ophthalmological cell-based therapy

Cell therapy is a promising treatment for diseases that are caused by cell degeneration or death. The cells for clinical transplantation are usually obtained by culturing healthy allogeneic or exogenous tissue invitro. However, for diseases of the eye, obtaining the adequate number of cells for clinical transplantation is difficult due to the small size of tissue donors and the frequent needs of long-term amplification of cells in vitro, which results in low cell viability after transplantation. In addition, the transplanted cells often develop fibrosis or degrade and have very low survival. Embryonic stem cells(ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells(i PS) are also promising candidates for cell therapy. Unfortunately, the differentiation of ESCs can bring immune rejection, tumorigenicity and undesired differentiated cells, limiting its clinical application. Although i PS cells can avoid the risk of immune rejection caused by ES cell differentiation post-transplantation, the low conversion rate, the risk of tumor formation and the potentially unpredictable biological changes that could occur through genetic manipulation hinder its clinical application. Thus, the desired clinical effect of cell therapy is impaired by these factors. Recent research findings recognize that the reason for low survival of the implanted cells not only depends on the seeded cells, but also on the cell microenvironment, which determines the cell survival, proliferation and even reverse differentiation. When used for cell therapy, the transplanted cells need a specific three-dimensional structure to anchor and specific extra cellular matrix components in addition to relevant cytokine signaling to transfer the required information to support their growth. These structures present in the matrix in which the stem cells reside are known as the stem cell microenvironment. The microenvironment interaction with the stem cells provides the necessary homeostasis for cell maintenance and growth. A large number of studies suggest that to explore how to reconstruct the stem cell microenvironment and strengthen its combination with the transplanted cells are key steps to successful cell therapy. In this review, we will describe the interactions of the stem cell microenvironment with the stem cells, discuss the importance of the stem cell microenvironment for cell-based therapy in ocular diseases, and introduce the progress of stem cell-basedtherapy for ocular diseases.     

Shared Gene Regulation during Human Somatic Cell Reprogramming

Human induced pluripotent stem(iPS)cells have the ability to differentiate into all somatic cells and to maintain unlimited selfrenewal. Therefore,they have great potential in both basic research and clinical therapy for many diseases.To identify potentially universal mechanisms of human somatic cell reprogramming,we studied gene expression changes in three types of cells undergoing reprogramming.The set of 570 genes commonly regulated during induction of iPS cells includes known embryonic stem(ES)cell markers and pluripotency related genes.We also identified novel genes and biological categories which may be related to somatic cell reprogramming.For example,some of the down-regulated genes are predicted targets of the pluripotency microRNA cluster miR302/367, and the proteins from these putative target genes interact with the stem cell pluripotency factor POU5F1 according to our network analysis.Our results identified candidate gene sets to guide research on the mechanisms operating during somatic cell reprogramming.     

Notes from the Underground： Receptor-Like Kinases in Arabidopsis Root Development

During plant development, the frequency and context of cell division must be controlled, and cells must differentiate properly to perform their mature functions. In addition, stem cell niches need to be maintained as a reservoir for new cells. All of these processes require intercellular signaling, whether it is a cell relaying its position to other cells, or more mature cells signaling to the stem cell niche to regulate the rate of growth. Receptor-like kinases have emerged as a major component in these diverse roles, especially within the Arabidopsis root. In this review, the functions of receptor-like kinase signaling in regulating Arabidopsis root development will be examined in theareas of root apical meristem maintenance, regulation of epidermal cell fate, lateral root development and vascular differentiation.     

Pluripotency of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Induced pluripotent stem （iPS） cells can be generated by forced expression of four pluripotency factors in somatic cells. This has received much attention in recent years since it may offer us a promising donor cell source for cell transplantation therapy. There has been great progress in iPS cell research in the past few years. However, several issues need to be further addressed in the near future before the clinical application of iPS cells, like the immunogenieity of iPS cells, the variability of differentiation potential and most importantly tumor formation of the iPS derivative cells. Here, we review recent progress in research into the pluripotency of iPS cells.