珊瑚礁白化研究进展

珊瑚礁白化是由于珊瑚失去体内共生的虫黄藻和（或）共生的虫黄藻失去体内色素而导致五彩缤纷的珊瑚礁变白的生态现象。近年来，频繁发生的珊瑚礁白化导致了珊瑚礁生态系统严重退化，并已经影响到全球珊瑚礁生态系统的平衡，受到了人们的高度重视。研究认为：（1）大范围珊瑚礁白化主要是全球环境变化引起的，尤其是全球变暖和紫外辐射增强；（2）导致珊瑚礁白化的机制主要在于细胞机制和光抑制机制；（3）珊瑚礁白化后的恢复与白化程度有关，大范围白化的珊瑚礁完全恢复需要几年到几十年；（4）珊瑚礁白化的后果在于降低珊瑚繁殖能力、减缓珊瑚礁生长、改变礁栖生物的群落结构，导致大面积珊瑚死亡和改变珊瑚礁生态类型，如变为海藻型等；（5）与珊瑚共生的D系群虫黄藻更适应高温环境，珊瑚礁有可能通过D系群逐渐取代C系群的方式适应全球环境变化。     

南海孔石藻可培养细菌多样性及代谢产物四溴吡咯研究

钙化藻和微生物在造礁石珊瑚幼虫的附着变态过程中扮演着重要角色,对珊瑚礁生态系统的健康具有重要意义。对南海珊瑚礁区钙化藻的共附生细菌进行分离培养,一方面有利于发掘南海珊瑚礁的微生物资源,另一方面有利于进行微生物与珊瑚、钙化藻等珊瑚礁框架生物的相互作用研究。本研究分离获得孔石藻(Porolithon onkodes)表面共附生细菌,基于16S rRNA基因序列进行系统发育分析,并通过高效液相色谱和质谱对分离得到的假交替单胞菌属菌株的代谢产物进行比较分析。从孔石藻分离获得的369株细菌菌株分别隶属于变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)和厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)的5纲12目22科47属的97个种级类群。在属级水平上,假交替单胞菌属(Pseudoalteromonas)的菌株数量最多,分属于7个种。在假交替单胞菌属的代谢产物分析中,发现3株在系统发育树中聚为一簇的假交替单胞菌的代谢产物中存在四溴吡咯,而其余没有。研究结果不仅表明了钙化藻中含有丰富的可培养微生物和潜在新物种资源,还首次发现四溴吡咯在南海珊瑚礁区特定类群菌株的代谢产物中的存在,为珊瑚幼虫附着变态的化学信号研究提供基础。     

海藻有性繁殖生态学研究进展

由于研究技术与方法的不断改进 ,人们对海藻 (seaweeds)早期生活史方面的研究兴趣日益增大。评述了近年来海藻有性繁殖过程中配子释放和受精生态学问题。到达一定生理状态的海藻 ,通过对环境暗示应答而诱导配子形成。海藻生殖器官感受另一些特定的环境条件 ,通过有关信号传递机制 ,触发配子释放。海藻配子释放的时间及其所需的环境条件 ,依不同的种类而变化。配子同步释放以及各种适当的环境条件提高了受精频率和受精成功率 ,有利于受精的各种生物的和非生物的因素组合 ,形成了“机会窗 (the window of opportunity)”的概念。近年来的研究表明 ,海藻 (特别是红藻 )的自然受精成功率比以前所认为的要高得多。受精后合子 (胚 )的散布、集落与附着显著地影响其生存以及种群动态。对今后值得进一步研究的方面作了展望     

亚龙湾珊瑚礁大型礁栖生物的群落结构及生态警示

鱼类和大型底栖生物等礁栖生物是珊瑚礁生态系统的重要组成部分,其群落信息是全面评价珊瑚礁生态系统健康状况的必要基础数据。基于录像样带法,分析了2018年12月底海南省三亚市亚龙湾珊瑚礁区17个站位礁栖鱼类和大型底栖生物的群落结构、数量分布及相似性,揭示了其中的生态警示,并提出相应的监管建议,旨在保护和恢复亚龙湾的珊瑚礁。结果表明:亚龙湾西岸及东排、西排共发现鱼类8科21属35种,以雀鲷科、隆头鱼科为主,平均密度为0.20尾·m^-2,金尾雀鲷、斑棘眶锯雀鲷和细鳞光鳃鱼为优势种;最近15年来,亚龙湾的鱼类资源持续衰退,目前已近于枯竭。另一方面,调查区的大型底栖生物以软珊瑚、大型底栖藻类、海百合和海胆为主,各类群的数量分布有所不同;造礁珊瑚的敌害生物小核果螺和长棘海星密度皆很低,目前尚不会对珊瑚礁构成威胁;整体而言,大型礁栖生物群落在亚龙湾西岸与东排、西排有较大的差异,间接反映出岛礁与岸礁环境存在差别,不过亚龙湾西岸湾口段的环境条件可能更接近岛礁;由于部分海区大型底栖藻类较多及可能存在的富营养化趋势,维持金尾雀鲷或其他植食性鱼类与藻类规模两者间的平衡,对恢复和保持亚龙湾珊瑚礁生态系统的健康尤为重要;同时,管控来自青梅河等的陆源污染,也是控制亚龙湾大型海藻增殖的关键;相比于海参,海百合对大型底栖藻类的依赖程度较低。调查区造礁珊瑚覆盖率与礁栖生物数量之间没有显著相关,可能与亚龙湾珊瑚礁退化严重及现存的种类以团块状造礁珊瑚为主,其构建的珊瑚礁生境空间异质性相对较低有关。为更好地保护亚龙湾的珊瑚礁,建议关注亚龙湾的水质,加强对捕鱼、潜水观光等旅游活动的监督管理,特别是应该立即实施长时间的渔业禁捕来恢复亚龙湾的渔业资源,并定期监控关键种群的数量变动。     

海南三亚后海海域珊瑚礁生态系统的健康状况及其影响因素

分别采用鹞式调查法和断面监测法调查了海南三亚后海海域珊瑚的物种多样性、覆盖率、病害和补充量等指标,利用健康指数(CI)评估了后海珊瑚礁生态系统的健康状况,并初步分析了影响该区域珊瑚礁健康状况的主要因素。调查发现:后海海域造礁石珊瑚54种,覆盖率达到50%以上,珊瑚病害及死亡率低,珊瑚补充量高达4.5个·m-2,CI值介于1.87~2.27,表明后海海域的珊瑚礁生态系统非常健康。分析认为:后海海域浅水区域存在的海草床和大型藻类,以及珊瑚礁区高密度的植食性动物和夏季上升流的存在是该区域珊瑚礁生态系统健康的主要原因。海草和海藻将陆源污染物过滤吸收,确保进入珊瑚礁生态系统的水质良好;数量众多的植食性动物(如魔鬼海胆Diadema setosum等)调控了大型藻类和珊瑚之间的竞争关系,保证大型海藻不会威胁到珊瑚的健康生长;而后海海域夏季上升流的出现使得该海域珊瑚礁生态系统不会受到高温的影响,不会产生热白化现象。这样,多个因素的共同作用保证了后海珊瑚礁生态系统的健康。     

日益受损的珊瑚免疫机能

1983年夏天,加勒比海海底数百平方米的麋角珊瑚由于疾病原因开始断裂,并且被绿色的海藻层侵占。数年之内,只剩下乱石堆。波多黎各大学的珊瑚礁生物学家Ernesto Weil说：“海藻摧毁了大部分的鹿角珊瑚（Acropora）。”Weil对加勒比海的珊瑚礁已经进行了30年的研究。     

珊瑚礁生态系统病毒研究进展

病毒对珊瑚礁生态系统中的生物进化、生物地球化学循环、珊瑚疾病等方面具有重要的生态影响。随着珊瑚礁的全球性退化，病毒在珊瑚礁生态系统中的功能与危害日益显现。综述了珊瑚礁生态系统中病毒的研究现状与进展，包括：（1）珊瑚礁病毒的多样性与分布特征（水体、宿主、核心病毒组）；（2）珊瑚礁病毒的生态功能（感染方式、促进生物进化、生物地球化学循环）；（3）珊瑚礁病毒对全球气候变化的响应（热压力、珊瑚疾病）。总体而言，珊瑚礁生态系统具有极高的病毒多样性，所发现的60个科占已知所有病毒科数量的58%。珊瑚的核心病毒组主要由双链DNA病毒、单链DNA病毒、单链逆转录病毒所组成，珊瑚黏液层对病毒具有富集作用。"Piggyback-the-Winner"（依附-胜利）是病毒在珊瑚礁中主要的生物动力学模式，其可通过水平基因迁移的方式促进礁区生物进化。病毒可通过裂解细菌与浮游藻类的途径参与珊瑚礁的生物地球化学循环，尤其是碳循环与氮循环过程。此外，病毒还具有介导珊瑚热白化与直接引发珊瑚疾病的能力，这会影响珊瑚礁生态系统应对气候变化的适应性与恢复力。基于国际上的研究进展综述，结合南海珊瑚礁生态现状提出以下研究方向，以期促进我国珊瑚礁病毒学的发展：（1）开展南海珊瑚礁中病毒多样性的识别及其时-空分布特征研究；（2）探索病毒对南海珊瑚热白化、珊瑚疾病的介导作用及其与气候变化的关系；（3）揭示病毒对南海珊瑚礁生物地球化学循环的贡献。     

珊瑚礁生态系统中珊瑚藻的生态作用研究进展

珊瑚藻是海洋红藻中的大型钙化藻类,全球分布623种,中国现有记录共77种。随着生态科学研究的广泛展开,人们越来越认识到,珊瑚藻在海洋生态系统中,尤其在维持珊瑚礁生态系统的生物多样性及生态功能中发挥着重要作用。目前,科研人员对有关珊瑚藻的初级生产力、钙化作用以及在诱导底栖无脊椎动物幼虫的附着与变态等方面已有多方面的研究和探索。然而,有关珊瑚藻生态功能的深层次机理问题有待进一步深入研究。文章着重围绕目前珊瑚藻研究中的一些热点问题,从近年来珊瑚藻在珊瑚礁生态系统中的生态功能方面的研究概况进行综述,以期加深人们对珊瑚藻的认识,并促进对珊瑚藻生态功能的进一步深入研究。     

珊瑚礁生态修复研究进展

珊瑚礁生态系统有着很高的生物多样性和重要的生态功能。20世纪80年代以后全球范围内珊瑚礁的大面积退化引起了人们广泛的关注。简述了世界珊瑚礁资源现状,破坏原因,生态修复方法以及我国的珊瑚礁资源现状和修复策略等。国际上通用的生态修复策略主要是根据珊瑚的两种繁殖方式进行的,此外再配合人为的适度干扰,增加珊瑚的成活率。方法主要有：珊瑚移植、Gardening、人工渔礁、底质稳固、幼体附着等以及对相关利益者的宣传,海岸带的保护等。我国珊瑚礁退化严重,但是由于缺乏相关的科技资料报道和技术支持,缺乏系统的研究,使得珊瑚礁的生态修复成绩甚微,今后应在该领域开展更多的工作。     

珊瑚白化及温度相关基因的研究进展

近年来,由于海洋酸化、海洋污染、海洋表面温度升高以及人类活动的影响,珊瑚礁遭受到了严重的白化袭击,导致珊瑚礁处于退化状态。相关功能基因在珊瑚白化过程中可能起到增强珊瑚的抗逆性和恢复能力等作用,探讨这些基因在珊瑚白化过程中的表达变化及调控作用也已经成为了当今的研究热点,通过分析其生理调控作用,可以深入了解珊瑚白化机制与恢复机制。本综述总结了珊瑚白化与温度的关系和珊瑚温度相关基因的研究进展,并重点介绍了细胞响应机制中的细胞免疫相关基因、细胞生长调控基因、钙离子相关基因、核酸稳定与修复相关基因以及其它重要基因的研究。     

Mechanisms of interaction between macroalgae and scleractinians on a coral reef in Jamaica

After several decades of disturbance, many coral reefs in the Caribbean are dominated by macroalgae. One process affecting this transition is coral-macroalgal competition, yet few studies have addressed the mechanisms involved. In this study, we investigated competition between the tall and bushy macroalga Sargassum hystrix (J. Agardh) and the branching coral Porites porites (Pallas) on a shallow reef in Jamaica. Experiments were designed to expose coral branches to different treatments to test the role of shading and abrasion by Sargassum on coral growth and polyp expansion. Corals exposed to Sargassum grew significantly more slowly (80% reduction) than controls, but this effect was absent when corals were caged to prevent physical contact with macroalgae. Light levels were reduced in both the algal and cage treatments, but shading apparently had little effect on the growth of corals in cages. Short-term measurements of integrated net water flow did not detect variation among treatments. In algal-mimic treatments, where clear plastic strips could touch but not shade the corals, growth rates were 25% lower than controls, but this effect was not statistically significant. Thus, the growth of corals in contact with Sargassum was reduced by abrasion and, to a lesser extent, by factors unique to living macroalgae. Analysis of polyp expansion showed that polyps were more frequently retracted when corals were in contact with macroalgae or algal-mimics compared to controls or cage treatment; the frequency of polyp contraction was correlated positively with growth. Together, these results suggest that abrasion-mediated polyp retraction is one of the primary mechanisms of competition utilized by tall (ca. 17 cm) macroalgae against scleractinian corals.     

Rehabilitation of coral reefs through removal of macroalgae: state of knowledge and considerations for management and implementation

Coral reef ecosystems are under increasing pressure by multiple stressors that degrade reef condition and function. Although improved management systems have yielded benefits in many regions, broad‐scale declines continue and additional practical and effective solutions for reef conservation and management are urgently needed. Ecological interventions to assist or enhance ecosystem recovery are standard practice in many terrestrial management regimes, and they are now increasingly being implemented in the marine environment. Intervention activities in coral reef systems include the control of coral predators (e.g. crown‐of‐thorns starfish), substrate modification, the creation of artificial habitats and the cultivation, transplantation, and assisted recruitment of corals. On many coastal reefs, corals face competition and overgrowth by fleshy macroalgae whose abundance may be elevated due to acute disturbance events, chronic nutrient enrichment, and reduced herbivory. Active macroalgae removal has been proposed and trialed as a management tool to reduce competition between algae and corals and provide space for coral recruitment, in the hope of restoring the spatial dominance of habitat‐forming corals. However, macroalgae removal has received little formal attention as a method of reef restoration. This review synthesizes available knowledge of the ecological role of macroalgae on coral reefs and the potential benefits and risks associated with their active removal.     

Allelochemicals produced by Caribbean macroalgae and cyanobacteria have species-specific effects on reef coral microorganisms

Coral populations have precipitously declined on Caribbean reefs while algal abundance has increased, leading to enhanced competitive damage to corals, which likely is mediated by the potent allelochemicals produced by both macroalgae and benthic cyanobacteria. Allelochemicals may affect the composition and abundance of coral-associated microorganisms that control host responses and adaptations to environmental change, including susceptibility to bacterial diseases. Here, we demonstrate that extracts of six Caribbean macroalgae and two benthic cyanobacteria have both inhibitory and stimulatory effects on bacterial taxa cultured from the surfaces of Caribbean corals, macroalgae, and corals exposed to macroalgal extracts. The growth of 54 bacterial isolates was monitored in the presence of lipophilic and hydrophilic crude extracts derived from Caribbean macroalgae and cyanobacteria using 96-well plate bioassays. All 54 bacterial cultures were identified by ribotyping. Lipophilic extracts from two species of Dictyota brown algae inhibited >50% of the reef coral bacteria assayed, and hydrophilic compounds from Dictyota menstrualis particularly inhibited Vibrio bacteria, a genus associated with several coral diseases. In contrast, both lipo- and hydrophilic extracts from 2 species of Lyngbya cyanobacteria strongly stimulated bacterial growth. The brown alga Lobophora variegata produced hydrophilic compounds with broad-spectrum antibacterial effects, which inhibited 93% of the bacterial cultures. Furthermore, bacteria cultured from different locations (corals vs. macroalgae vs. coral surfaces exposed to macroalgal extracts) responded differently to algal extracts. These results reveal that extracts from macroalgae and cyanobacteria have species-specific effects on the composition of coral-microbial assemblages, which in turn may increase coral host susceptibility to disease and result in coral mortality.     

Macroalgae, nutrients and phase shifts on coral reefs: scientific issues and management consequences for the Great Barrier Reef

 Degradation of coral reefs often involves a “phase shift” from abundant coral to abundant macroalgae. This paper critically reviews the roles of nutrient increases in such phase shifts. I conclude that nutrient overloads can contribute to reef degradation, but that they are unlikely to lead to phase shifts simply by enhancing algal growth rates and hence allowing overgrowth of corals, unless herbivory is unusually or artificially low. Concentrations of dissolved inorganic nutrients are poor indicators of reef status, and the concept of a simple threshold concentration that indicates eutrophication has little validity. I discuss the significance and consequences of these assessments for reef management, focusing on the Great Barrier Reef, and conclude with some specific recommendations, including protection of herbivorous fishes, minimisation of terrestrial runoff, and protection of coastal reefs. Accepted: 13 August 1999     

High CO2 enhances the competitive strength of seaweeds over corals

Space competition between corals and seaweeds is an important ecological process underlying coral-reef dynamics. Processes promoting seaweed growth and survival, such as herbivore overfishing and eutrophication, can lead to local reef degradation. Here, we present the case that increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO(2) may be an additional process driving a shift from corals to seaweeds on reefs. Coral (Acropora intermedia) mortality in contact with a common coral-reef seaweed (Lobophora papenfussii) increased two- to threefold between background CO(2) (400 ppm) and highest level projected for late 21st century (1140 ppm). The strong interaction between CO(2) and seaweeds on coral mortality was most likely attributable to a chemical competitive mechanism, as control corals with algal mimics showed no mortality. Our results suggest that coral (Acropora) reefs may become increasingly susceptible to seaweed proliferation under ocean acidification, and processes regulating algal abundance (e.g. herbivory) will play an increasingly important role in maintaining coral abundance.     

Overgrowth and killing of corals by the brown alga Lobophora hederacea (Dictyotales,Phaeophyceae) on healthy reefs in New Caledonia: A new case of the epizoism syndrome

Coral reef degradation is often associated with regime shifts from coral‐ to macroalgal‐dominated reefs. These shifts demonstrate that under certain conditions (e.g. coral mortality, decrease in herbivory, increased nutrients supply) some macroalgae may overgrow corals. The outcome of the competition is dependent on algal aggressiveness and the coral susceptibility. In undisturbed reefs, herbivore grazing is regulating macroalgal cover, thus preventing the latter from overgrowing corals. However, some macroalgae have evolved strategies not only to outcompete corals but also to escape herbivory to some extent, allowing overgrowth of some coral species in undisturbed reefs. Epizoism represents one of those successful strategies, and has been previously documented with red algae, cyanobacteria and Lobophora variegata (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae). Here we report a new case of epizoism leading to coral mortality, involving a recently described species of Lobophora, L. hederacea, overgrowing the coral Seriatopora caliendrum (Pocilloporidae) in undisturbed reefs in New Caledonia.     

Coral-algal competition on damaged reefs

Natural and anthropogenic catastrophes occurred at the end of the previous and in the beginning of the current centuries at the coral reefs of the World Ocean, and their consequences for the tropical shelf ecosystems have been described based on published data and our own investigations. It has been shown that in recent decades coral populations on reefs of tropical and subtropical regions of the World Ocean have been reduced by 80%, and in some areas have completely vanished. The biodiversity of reef ecosystems has been considerably reduced. The main reason for such changes is a 1-2°C increase in the temperature of surface waters in comparison with the monthly mean temperature in the hot season. The fate of the damaged coral reefs is under discussion. It is thought that in clean waters partially damaged coral reefs can recover, whereas in waters polluted as the result of human activity they collapse. The rate of coral reef restoration depends on the hydrological and hydrochemical conditions, frequency of natural calamities and competitive interrelation of algae and corals on the damaged sites of coral reefs. The nature of competitive interrelation between algae and corals is considered, viz., the dynamics of obliteration of damaged and dead coral colonies by various algal species, mechanisms of competitive interrelation, effects of the environment on the competitive ability of corals and algae, the internal and external conditions for victory in competitive activity. It has been suggested that coral reefs can be restored through temporary transformation into a vegetable reef. In the absence of natural calamities damaged reefs can be clearly restored to their original or altered state over several decades, but only in clean waters.     

Competition between corals and algae on coral reefs: a review of evidence and mechanisms

Despite widespread acceptance that competition between scleractinian corals and benthic algae is important to the structure of coral reef communities, there is little direct experimental evidence that corals and algae do compete, and very little data on the processes and causality of their interactions. Most available evidence is observational or correlative, with intrinsic risks of confounded causality. This paper reviews and categorises the available evidence, concluding that competition between corals and algae probably is widespread on coral reefs, but also that the interaction varies considerably. Widespread replacement of corals by algae may often indicate coral mortality due to external disturbances, rather than competitive overgrowth, but may lead to competitive inhibition of coral recruitment, with consequences for reef recovery. We list eight specific processes by which corals and algae may affect each other, and suggest life history properties that will influence which of these interactions are possible. We propose a matrix for algal effects on corals, which lists the subset of processes possible for each combination of coral life form and algal functional group. This table provides a preliminary framework for improved understanding and interpretation of coral-algal interactions.     

Competition between corals and algal turfs along a gradient of terrestrial influence in the nearshore central Great Barrier Reef

Competition between benthic algae and corals is a key process in the community ecology of reefs, especially during reef degradation. However, there have been very few experimental tests for competition between corals and benthic algae, despite widespread assumptions that algae are generally superior competitors, especially in eutrophic conditions. This study tested for competition for space between the massive coral Porites lobata and algal filamentous turfs on three reefs along a cross-shelf gradient of terrestrial influence, by experimentally removing or damaging either corals or algae. The corals and algae were competing for space, but, significantly, the algae appeared to have little effect on coral growth. In contrast, corals significantly inhibited algal growth, suggesting Porites was the competitive superior. Importantly, coral growth was generally positive, even on the reef with the greatest terrestrial influence. Competitive outcomes did not support the argument that algae are more successful competitors in more eutrophic conditions.     

Hyperspectral and Physiological Analyses of Coral-Algal Interactions

Space limitation leads to competition between benthic, sessile organisms on coral reefs. As a primary example, reef-building corals are in direct contact with each other and many different species and functional groups of algae. Here we characterize interactions between three coral genera and three algal functional groups using a combination of hyperspectral imaging and oxygen microprofiling. We also performed in situ interaction transects to quantify the relative occurrence of these interaction on coral reefs. These studies were conducted in the Southern Line Islands, home to some of the most remote and near-pristine reefs in the world. Our goal was to determine if different types of coral-coral and coral-algal interactions were characterized by unique fine-scale physiological signatures. This is the first report using hyperspectral imaging for characterization of marine benthic organisms at the micron scale and proved to be a valuable tool for discriminating among different photosynthetic organisms. Consistent patterns emerged in physiology across different types of competitive interactions. In cases where corals were in direct contact with turf or macroalgae, there was a zone of hypoxia and altered pigmentation on the coral. In contrast, interaction zones between corals and crustose coralline algae (CCA) were not hypoxic and the coral tissue was consistent across the colony. Our results suggest that at least two main characteristic coral interaction phenotypes exist: 1) hypoxia and coral tissue disruption, seen with interactions between corals and fleshy turf and/or some species of macroalgae, and 2) no hypoxia or tissue disruption, seen with interactions between corals and some species of CCA. Hyperspectral imaging in combination with oxygen profiling provided useful information on competitive interactions between benthic reef organisms, and demonstrated that some turf and fleshy macroalgae can be a constant source of stress for corals, while CCA are not.