白胸苦恶鸟消化管的组织学观察

采用石蜡切片技术对白胸苦恶鸟(Amaurornis phoenicurus)的消化道进行了组织学观察.结果表明,食管皱襞发达,黏膜上皮为复层扁平上皮,食管腺发达,颈段多于胸段,黏膜肌层为一层纵肌,厚约0.06 ～0.26 mm.肌层为一层厚约0.19～0.27mm的环肌.腺胃被覆单层柱状上皮,固有层内有单管腺和复管腺两种腺体,单管腺仅深约0.11 ～0.20 mm;复管腺厚约1.19～1.26 mm,占管壁的77.8％ ～80.4％.肌胃的类角质层发达,厚约0.16～0.24 mm.肌胃腺呈管状,与类角质层突起形成皱襞.肌层发达,由内环外纵两层平滑肌构成.肠绒毛无分支和中央乳糜管,十二指肠绒毛长而密集,空肠绒毛呈细长指状,直肠绒毛长且呈叶状.十二指肠与直肠肠绒毛内有大量致密淋巴小结,盲肠绒毛短,肠腺少.     

川金丝猴肠,肝,胰的观察

对川金丝猴（Rhinioithecusrozxellane的肠、肝、胰作了观察。小肠全长284．0-296．0cm,其中十二指肠9．0－12．0cm,呈V形,余为空回肠。大肠长约120．0－130．0cm;无阑尾;升结肠短,仅7．0－8．0cm,横结肠19．0－20．0cm,降结肠及乙状结肠达80．0－90．0cm。肝分背、腹侧二部,腹侧部又分作上、下二部。胆总管开日于十二指肠上部。胰呈T形,胰头为十二指肠降、升部围绕,胰管由胰头发出,开口于十二指肠升部。对个体间的差别、盲结肠发达程度的相关因素、肝叶愈合与进化的关系作了讨论。     

画眉消化系统形态的初步观察

对8只(4♀,4♂)画眉消化系统的形态学作了初步的观察与研究,画眉的舌成细长三角形,前端有刺毛状结构,雌鸟的刺毛数目多且较细,雄鸟的刺毛则数量少,但是相对较粗大.舌后端有1～2排尖端后指的栉状突.雌雄鸟在舌前端正中央还有一"V"形的凹缺,雌鸟深约1.22 mm,雄鸟深约1.87 mm.食管管径较细,整体宽窄不等,无明显可见的嗉囊.腺胃乳突短而小,分布均匀,肌胃发达,具角质膜.肠道长与体长基本相等,小肠较发达,雌鸟小肠长178.53 mm,占肠道总长87.43%;雄鸟小肠长186.62 mm,占肠道总长89.01%.具有不发达的双侧盲肠,盲肠有未倒置现象.肝为体内最大的消化腺,分左右两叶,右叶又分一小叶.胰位于十二指肠袢内,细长形,分两小叶.并与同科的蓝翅希鹛、灰胸薮鹛进行了比较.     

宽体沙鳅消化系统的结构

运用形态解剖和组织学方法对宽体沙鳅消化系统进行了研究.宽体沙鳅的胃呈U形;消化道较短,为体长的1.02±0.05倍.咽部粘膜层味蕾发达;未见食道纵肌层;胃分贲门部、盲囊部和幽门部,贲门部具胃腺,盲囊部环肌层发达,幽门部肌肉层3层,呈纵-环-纵排列,幽门括约肌发达;肠各段组织结构无明显差异;肝脏2叶,左叶发达;胰腺组织弥散在肝、脾、胃、肠等的系膜上或随血管的分支进入肝脏组织内.     

菌群失调腹泻抗生素造模对小鼠肠黏膜的影响

目的研究抗生素造模对菌群失调腹泻小鼠肠黏膜的影响。方法正常组给予无菌生理盐水0.35m L/(只·次)灌胃,其余各组采用头孢拉定胶囊和硫酸庆大霉素注射液用无菌生理盐水配成浓度为62.5g/L抗生素混合液0.35 m L/(只·次)灌胃。每天2次,连续5 d。造模成功后,采集小鼠空肠、回肠和结肠,分别测量绒毛高度、隐窝深度、淋巴细胞数和肠黏膜厚度,观察肠黏膜情况。结果菌群失调腹泻抗生素造模后,空肠、回肠和结肠的隐窝深度及肠黏膜厚度与正常组相比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05);造模后的结肠淋巴细胞数与正常组相比较,高于正常组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),造模后的空肠绒毛高度与正常组相比,明显低于正常组,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。结论菌群失调腹泻抗生素造模使结肠淋巴细胞数增高,空肠绒毛高度降低。     

法罗培南在大鼠肠道吸收部位的初步研究

目的:研究法罗培南在大鼠各肠段的吸收率,以确定最佳吸收部位,为制定合理的药物制剂提供科学依据.方法:采用大鼠在体肠循环法,各肠段区间如下:十二指肠段自幽门1cm处开始;空肠段离幽门15cm处开始;回肠段离盲肠上行20 cm处开始:结肠段从盲肠后段开始.各肠段取10 cm左右,将所取肠段两端开口、插管并结扎,插管与恒流泵连接.形成各自的回路.用HPLC法梯度洗脱测定法罗培南的浓度,依据药物在肠段中回流2小时后的减少量来确定各肠段法罗培南的吸收量.结果:法罗培南在大鼠各肠段吸收率平均值为十二指肠6.91±3.08%;空肠5.66±2.29%;回肠9.62±4.08%;结肠4.65±1.29%.稳定性实验、精密度实验、回收率实验的RSD分别为0.48%、0.234%和2.01%.结论:法罗培南在各肠段均有吸收,吸收率按回肠、十二指肠、空肠、结肠顺序依次降低.     

人胎儿早中期肠壁肌层发育分化的研究

目的探讨人胚早中期肠壁肌层的发育分化过程.方法采用形态学及免疫组织化学方法对24例4-28周胎儿空肠、回肠、结肠肠壁肌层进行形态学及免疫组化观察.结果α-SMA阳性的环行肌层与纵行肌层在10周胎儿已形成完整环形,空肠、回肠的黏膜肌层在10周时刚开始形成,13周时才刚刚形成完整环形,而结肠的黏膜肌层迟至15周才形成完整环形,此时细胞均呈圆形或卵圆形,绒毛中央α-SMA阳性的细胞在13周胎儿各段肠已出现,但结肠较空肠、回肠少.此后,随着胎龄的增大,各肌层均明显增厚,细胞形态也逐渐由卵圆形变为梭形.结论环行肌层与纵行肌层的发育分化早于黏膜肌层;空肠、回肠各肌层的发育分化早于结肠.     

灰胸薮鹛消化系统形态的初步研究

对灰胸薮鹛（Liocichla omeiensis）消化系统的形态学作了初步观察,结果表明,灰胸薮鹛舌前端有刺毛状结构,后端有一排尖端后指的栉状突,且中间小两边大;雄鸟在舌前端正中央还有一“v”形的凹缺,深约2．5mm;雌鸟食道颈段长为13．2mm,雄鸟为17．5mm;嗉囊雌鸟长7．5mm,雄鸟长8．4mm;食道胸段雌鸟长15．5mm,雄鸟长14．7mm;肌胃发达,具角质膜,腺胃乳突短而小;肠道长与体长基本相等,小肠较发达,雌鸟长153．7mm,占肠道总长92．6％,雄鸟为133mm和95％,具有双侧盲肠,占肠道总长的3．3％,大肠短,雌鸟仅占肠道7．5％,雄鸟仅占4．75％;肝为体内最大的消化腺,分左右两叶;胰位于十二指肠袢内,细长形,分三小叶。     

东方铃蟾消化道组织学的初步研究

采用组织学方法对东方铃蟾的消化道进行了研究。结果表明:肠分为十二指肠、空肠和大肠。消化道管壁由粘膜层、粘膜下层、肌层和浆膜层构成。食道、胃和肠均为单层柱状上皮。胃和十二指肠的粘膜皱褶最丰富。食道腺为复泡状腺,胃腺属于单管状腺,肠的各段无多细胞腺体,但空肠和大肠有丰富的杯状细胞。肌层均为平滑肌,内层环肌较厚,外侧纵肌较薄,其中大肠的外侧纵肌最发达。     

小鼠胃肠道嗜银细胞的分布及形态学观察

用Grimelius嗜银法对10只小鼠胃肠道嗜银细胞的分布及形态学作了观察研究,结果显示：（l）小鼠嗜银细胞的分布密度,在胃体部最高,从十二脂肠、空肠、回肠、盲肠直到结肠依次减少。（2）嗜银细胞的形态也是多种多样,有梭形、锥体形、椭圆形等。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor