Induction of cyclicity in postpartum anestrous beef cows using progesterone, GnRH and estradiol cypionate (ECP)

The objective of the present study was to determine whether treatment of postpartum multiparous and primiparous anestrous beef cows with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing insert (CIDR) and PGF(2alpha), with and without the addition of GnRH or estradiol cypionate (ECP) at the time of CIDR insertion, is effective in stimulating onset of estrous cycles. Postpartum lactating Angus primiparous (n=47, 2 years of age, 495+/-6 kg) and multiparous (n=76, >or=3 years of age, 553+/-9 kg) cows were assigned by calving date to four blocks spaced 21-day apart. Cows were assigned sequentially by calving date to four treatment groups: (1) PGF(2alpha) (n=30), (2) CIDR-PGF(2alpha) (n=30), (3) GnRH-CIDR-PGF(2alpha) (n=33), and (4) ECP-CIDR-PGF(2alpha) (n=27). Intravaginal CIDR inserts were in place from days -7 to 0. A single 100 microg injection of GnRH or 2 mg ECP were administered on day -7, and 25mg PGF(2alpha) was administered on day 0. Day 0 averaged 38+/-1 day postpartum. Blood samples were collected on days -19, -9, 0, 5, 9, 12, 16, 19, 23, 26, and 30 for determination of plasma progesterone concentrations. Pre-treatment luteal activity (progesterone>or=1 ng/ml) was detected in 19% of primiparous and 8% of multiparous cows. Progesterone concentrations on day 0 were greater (P<0.001) in primiparous (3.2+/-0.3 ng/ml) than multiparous (2.0+/-0.2 ng/ml) cows. Following CIDR withdrawal, progesterone concentrations from days 5 to 30 were used to categorize response profiles as either: (1) treatment-induced onset of estrous cycles, (2) continued anestrus, or (3) spontaneous ovulation and subsequent formation of a CL. Incidence of treatment-induced onset of estrous cycles, which was defined as progesterone concentrations >or=1 ng/ml in three or more consecutive samples from days 9 to 19, was influenced by treatment and parity. Percentages of cows initiating estrous cycles were greater (P<0.001) in the three CIDR-treated groups than in the PGF(2alpha) group (55 and 8%, respectively). Percentages of cows initiating estrous cycles in the CIDR-PGF(2alpha), GnRH-CIDR-PGF(2alpha), and ECP-CIDR-PGF(2alpha) groups were 55, 58, and 52%, respectively. Incidence of treatment-induced estrous cycles in the three CIDR-treated groups of cows was greater (P=0.008) in primiparous (76%) than multiparous (43%) cows. Treatment of postpartum anestrous primiparous and multiparous beef cows with CIDR-PGF(2alpha) approximately 40-day postpartum provides an approach to increase the percentage of cows that have reinitiated estrous cycles by the start of the breeding season.     

Risk factors for resumption of postpartum estrous cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows

The objectives of this study were to evaluate factors associated with resumption of postpartum estrous cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows, 6396 from four dairy farms were evaluated to determine the relationships among parity, body condition score (BCS) at calving and at AI, season of year when cows calved, and milk yield on resumption of postpartum estrous cycles by 65 days postpartum, and all the previous variables, estrual or anestrus and AI protocol on conception rates and embryonic survival at the first postpartum insemination. Cows had their estrous cycle pre-synchronized with two PGF_2α injections given 14 days apart and were inseminated between 69 and 82 days postpartum following either an estrous or ovulation synchronization protocol initiated 12–14 days after the presynchronization. Blood was sampled and analyzed for progesterone twice, 12–14 days apart, to determine whether cows had initiated onset of estrous cycles after calving. Cows were scored for body condition in the week after calving, and again at AI, between 69 and 82 days postpartum. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 30 ± 3 and 58 ± 3 days after AI. Farm influenced all reproductive outcomes evaluated. More (P < 0.0001) multiparous than primiparous cows had initiated estrous cycles. Onset of estrous cycles was also influenced (P < 0.01) by BCS at calving and at AI, BCS change, season, and milk yield. More (P < 0.001) cows that had initiated estrous cycles than anestrous cows were pregnant at 30 and 58 days after AI, but anestrus did not affect pregnancy loss. Conception rates were also influenced (P < 0.01) by parity, BCS at calving and AI, BCS change, and season; however, milk yield and insemination protocol were not associated with conception rates at 30 and 58 days after AI. Factors that reduced conception rate on day 30 after AI also increased pregnancy loss between 30 and 58 days of gestation. Improving BCS at calving and AI, minimizing losses of BCS after calving, and hastening onset of estrous cycles early postpartum are all expected to increase conception because of enhanced embryonic survival.     

Improved conception in timed-artificial insemination using a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device and Ovsynch protocol in postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows

The primary objective was to determine the effect of supplemental progesterone, administered via an intravaginal device (CIDR), on conception rates to timed-artificial insemination (timed-AI) in postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows treated with the Ovsynch protocol. A secondary objective was to compare the effects of treatments on plasma concentrations of progesterone and estradiol. Cows in the control group (Ovsynch, n=38) received a standard Ovsynch protocol (100 microg GnRH analogue on Day 0, 500 microg PGF2alpha analogue on Day 7, and 100 microg GnRH analogue on Day 9), with AI on Day 10, approximately 20 h after the second GnRH treatment. Cows in the treatment group (Ovsynch+CIDR; n=40) received a standard Ovsynch protocol plus a CIDR for 7 days (starting on Day 0). Plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on Days 0, 1, 7, 9, 10, and 17 and plasma estradiol-17beta concentrations were determined on Days 7, 9, 10, and 17. The odds ratio for likelihood of conception was 3.29 times greater (P=0.02) in the Ovsynch+CIDR group compared to Ovsynch group. The conception rate was greater (P=0.03) in the Ovsynch+CIDR group than in the Ovsynch group (72.5% versus 47.7%). Insertion of a CIDR device significantly increased plasma progesterone concentrations only on Days 1 and 7 (P<0.001 and P=0.05, respectively), but had no significant effect on plasma estradiol-17beta concentrations. Including a CIDR with the Ovsynch protocol significantly improved conception rates in postpartum suckled Japanese Black beef cows.     

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following estrus synchronization regimens with PGF2alpha and progesterone

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of lactating cows in seasonal dairy herds after estrus synchronization with PGF2alpha (PG) with or without supplementation with progesterone (P4). In Trial 1, synchronized cows (S1; n = 521) were compared with untreated control cows (C; n = 518) in 5 herds. Estrus of cows in the S1 group was synchronized with 2 treatments of PG (Lutalyse) 13 d apart. The breeding season started 2 d after the second PG. Cows were first bred by AI for 7 wk and then herd sires were used. Compared with C cows, estrus synchronization in the treated cows reduced the conception rate to first AI (61.1 vs 70.5%; P < 0.01) and the intervals from start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving to AI (11.0 vs 14.6 d; P < 0.05) or to both AI and natural mating (16.5 vs 18.4 d; P < 0.05). There was no effect on conception rate to second AI (68.8%), on pregnancy rate by Day 24 (72.3%) or Day 49 (86.3%) of the breeding season, or on the percentage of cows not pregnant at end of the breeding season (5.0%). In Trial 2, effects of P4 supplementation before the second PG on reproductive performance were evaluated in 4 herds. Estrus of each cyclic cow was synchronized with PG as in Trial 1. Half of the cows in each herd were treated with an intravaginal P4 device (CIDR) for 5 d before the second PG (S2+P4, n = 608), whereas the remaining half received no CIDR treatment (S2, n = 593). Compared with S2 cows, P4 treatment increased the estrous response rate to the second PG (89.6 vs 82.9%; P < 0.01), the conception rate to first AI (65.1 vs 59.7%; P = 0.07), the pregnancy rate by Day 6 of the breeding season (59.3 vs 49.0%; P < 0.001), and reduced the intervals from start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving to AI (8.6 vs 10.4 d; P < 0.10) or to both AI and natural mating (12.7 vs 16.4 d; P < 0.01). Treatment with a used CIDR from Days 16 to 21 after start of breeding to re-synchronize returns to service had no effect on conception rate to first or second AI but may decrease the conception rate to second AI in cows previously treated with CIDR. In conclusion, estrus synchronization with the double PG system can reduce fertility, while P4 supplementation for 5 d before the second PG can improve estrous response and overall reproductive performance. Stage of the estrous cycle at the time of the second PG can affect fertility following synchronization.     

Comparison of long- versus short-term CIDR-based protocols to synchronize estrus prior to fixed-time AI in postpartum beef cows

This experiment was conducted to compare pregnancy rates in postpartum beef cows resulting from fixed-time AI (FTAI) after treatment with controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based protocols to synchronize estrus. Cows assigned to the Show-Me-Synch (n=167) protocol received a CIDR from d 0 to 14, and prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF(2α)) on d 30. Cows assigned to 7-d CO-Synch+CIDR (n=177) received a CIDR and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on d 23. On d 30, CIDRs were removed and PGF(2α) was administered. Blood sampling occurred on d -10 and 0 of treatment to determine estrous cyclicity status (progesterone ≥0.5 ng/mL estrous cycling). Treatments were balanced on age, DPP and BCS. Estrous detection was performed using HeatWatch from PGF(2α) to FTAI. Artificial insemination was performed at predetermined fixed times (72 h, Show-Me-Synch; 66h, 7-d CO-Synch+CIDR) and all cows were administered GnRH at FTAI. This experiment was conducted over a two year period; no differences were found between years so the data were pooled for further analysis. Pregnancy rate resulting from FTAI did not differ (P>0.10) between technicians or AI sires. Pregnancy rate resulting from FTAI was similar between treatments (P=0.20); however, cows that exhibited estrus prior to FTAI had a higher pregnancy rate (P<0.01) than for those that did not. Pregnancy rate at the end of the breeding period was similar between treatments (P=0.28). In summary, FTAI pregnancy rates were similar among postpartum beef cows following treatment with either a short- or long-term CIDR-based estrous synchronization protocol.     

Effects of resynchronization strategies for lactating Holstein cows on pattern of reinsemination, fertility, and economic outcome

The objectives were to evaluate the pattern of re-insemination, pregnancy outcomes to re-insemination in estrus and at fixed time, and economic outcomes of lactating Holstein cows submitted to three resynchronization protocols. Cows were enrolled in the Experiment at 32 ± 3 d after pre-enrollment Artificial Insemination (AI), 7 d before pregnancy diagnosis, and randomly assigned to three resynchronization protocols. All cows diagnosed not pregnant at 39 ± 3 d after pre-enrollment AI were submitted to the Cosynch72 (Day 0 GnRH, Day 7 prostaglandin F_2α, and Day 10 GnRH and fixed time AI). Cows assigned to the control treatment received no further treatment, cows assigned to the GGPG treatment received a GnRH injection on Day −7, and cows assigned to the CIDR treatment received a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert containing 1.38 g of progesterone from Days 0-7. Cows observed in estrus were re-inseminated on the same day. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 39 ± 3 and 67 ± 3 d after re-insemination. Costs of the resynchronization protocols were calculated for individual cows enrolled in the study and pregnancies generated were given a value of $275. The GGPG treatment resulted in the slowest (P ≤ 0.06) rate of re-insemination. Overall pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 39 ± 3 (P = 0.50) and 67 ± 3 (P = 0.49) d after re-insemination were not affected by treatment. Although cost of the control protocol was (P < 0.01) the smallest, return per cow resynchronized was (P < 0.01) greater for GGPG and CIDR protocols. We concluded that presynchronizing the estrous cycle of cows with GnRH or treating cows with a CIDR insert during resynchronization altered the pattern of re-insemination and improved the economic return of resynchronized cows.     

Synchronization of estrus with PGF2 alpha administered 18 days after a progesterone treatment in lactating dairy cows

In a previous study we showed that estrus synchronization with 2 treatments of PGF2 alpha 13 d apart reduced conception rate at the synchronized estrus and that this reduction occurred mainly in cows in the early luteal phase at the second PGF2 alpha treatment. The objective of the present study was to determine the efficacy of a synchronization regimen in which PGF2 alpha was administered during the mid- to late-luteal phase to cows that had previously been synchronized with progesterone. Spring-calving cows from 6 dairy herds were used in this study. On Day -32 (Day 1 = the start of the breeding season), cows that had calved 2 or more weeks ago were randomly assigned to a synchronization (S, n = 732) or control (C, n = 731) group. Cows in Group S were treated with an intravaginal progesterone device (CIDR) for 12 d from Day -32 to Day -20, while those in Group C were left untreated. Similar percentages of cows in Group S (80.6%) and C (82.9%) had cycled by Day -7. The CIDR treatment synchronized the onset of estrus, resulting in 92.9% of cows in estrus being detected within 7 d after CIDR removal. Cows in Group S that had cycled by Day -7 were treated with PGF2 alpha (25 mg, i.m., Lutalyse) on Day -2. Cows in both groups that were anestrous on Day -7 were treated with a combination of progesterone and estradiol benzoate (EB) to induce estrus and ovulation (CIDR and a 10 mg EB capsule on Day -7, CIDR removal on Day -2, and injection of 1 mg EB 48 h after CIDR removal). The PGF2 alpha treatment synchronized the onset of estrus in 87.5% of the cows. Group S and C cows had similar conception rates to first (61.0 vs 58.3%) and second (58.4 vs 60.9%) AI; similar pregnancy rates over the AI period (82.8 vs 79.2%) and over the whole breeding season (91.9 vs 90.6%); and required a similar number of services per pregnancy to AI (1.7 vs 1.8). The interval from the start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving to AI or to combined AI and natural mating was shorter (P < 0.001) by 5.7 and 6.2 d, respectively, for the Group S cows. It is concluded that the treatment regimen tested in the present study achieved satisfactory estrus synchronization, had no detrimental effect on fertility at the synchronized estrus, and shortened the interval from start of the breeding season to conception.     

Synchronization and resynchronization of inseminations in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol

Pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) was evaluated in dairy cows (Bos taurus) subjected to synchronization and resynchronization for timed AI (TAI). Cows (n = 718) received prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) on Days –38 and –24 (Days 39 and 53 postpartum), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day –10, PGF on Day –3, and GnRH and TAI on Day 0. Between Days –10 and –3, cows received a progesterone intravaginal insert (CIDR group) or no CIDR (Control group). Between Days 14 and 23, cows received a CIDR (Resynch CIDR group) or no CIDR (Resynch control group), GnRH on Day 23, with pregnancy diagnosis on Day 30. Cows in estrus (between Days 0 and 30) were re-inseminated at detected estrus (RIDE). Nonpregnant cows received PGF on Day 30 and GnRH and TAI on Day 33. Plasma progesterone was determined to be low or high on Days –24 and –10. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 30 and 55 d after AI. The CIDR insert included in the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol did not increase overall pregnancy per AI for first service (36.1% and 33.6% for CIDR; 34.1% and 28.8% for Control) but did decrease pregnancy loss (7.0% for CIDR and 15.6% for Control). The CIDR insert increased pregnancy per AI in cows with high progesterone at the time the CIDR insert was applied. Administration of a CIDR insert between Days 14 and 23 of the estrous cycle after first service did not increase overall pregnancy per AI to second service (24.7% and 22.7% for Resynch CIDR; 28.6% and 25.3% for Resynch control). For second service, RIDE cows had lower pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than in the Resynch control group. Cows with a CL (corpus luteum) at Day 30 had higher pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than those in the Resynch control group.     

Effect of timing of second prostaglandin F2α administration in a 5-day, progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on AI pregnancy rates in beef cows

The objective was to compare the timed AI pregnancy rate of Angus-cross beef cows synchronized with a 5-d CO-Synch + CIDR (a progesterone-releasing intravaginal insert) protocol and given two doses of PGF_2α (PGF), with the first dose in conjunction with CIDR withdrawal on Day 5, and the second dose given either early or late relative to the first dose. All cows (N = 1782) at 16 locations received 100 μg of GnRH + CIDR on Day 0. Cows received 25 mg of PGF concurrent with removal of the CIDR on Day 5, and were randomly allocated within locations to receive a second PGF either early (N = 881; from 0.5 to 3.9 h) or late (N = 901; from 4.5 to 8.15 h) relative to the first PGF treatment. On Day 8 (72 h after CIDR removal), all cows were inseminated and concurrently given 100 μg of GnRH. Cows were fitted with a pressure-sensitive mount detection device (Kamar) at CIDR removal. Cows were observed twice daily through Day 7 and at the time of AI on Day 8 for estrus and Kamar status (estrus - red, partial and lost Kamar versus no estrus - white Kamar) was recorded. Accounting for location, season, AI sire, cow observed in estrus or not at or before timed AI, and treatment by cows observed in estrus interaction, timed AI pregnancy rates were greater for the late (6.45 ± 0.03 h) than the early (2.25 ± 0.05 h) interval, 57.2 vs. 52.7%, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, cows that received the second PGF late after the first PGF on the day of CIDR removal in a 5 d CO-Synch + CIDR synchronization protocol had significantly higher timed AI pregnancy rates than those receiving the second PGF early after the first PGF.     

Luteal function,largest follicle,and fertility in postpartum dairy cows treated with 14dCIDR-PGF2α versus 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch for timed AI

A method for timed artificial insemination (AI) that is used for beef cows, beef heifers, and dairy heifers employs progesterone-releasing inserts, such as the controlled internal drug release (CIDR; Zoetis, New York, NY, USA) that are left in place for 14 days. The 14-day CIDR treatment is a method of presynchronization that ensures that cattle are in the late luteal phase of the estrous cycle when PGF_2α is administered before timed AI. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of the 14dCIDR-PGF_2α program in postpartum dairy cows by comparing it with the traditional “Presynch-Ovsynch” (2xPGF_2α-Ovsynch) program. The 14dCIDR-PGF_2α cows (n = 132) were treated with a CIDR insert on Day 0 for 14 days. At 19 days after CIDR removal (Day 33), the cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF_2α, 56 hours later were treated with an ovulatory dose of GnRH (Day 35), and 16 hours later were inseminated. The 2xPGF_2α-Ovsynch cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF_2α on Day 0 and again on Day 14. At 12 days after the second PGF_2α treatment (Day 26), the cows were treated with GnRH. At 7 days after GnRH, the cows were treated with PGF_2α (Day 33), then 56 hours later treated with GnRH (Day 35), and then 16 hours later were inseminated. There was no effect of treatment or treatment by parity interaction on pregnancies per AI (P/AI) when pregnancy diagnosis was performed on Day 32 (115/263; 43.7%) or Days 60 to 90 (99/263; 37.6%) after insemination. There was an effect of parity (P < 0.05) on P/AI because primiparous cows had lesser P/AI (35/98; 35.7%) than multiparous cows (80/165; 48.5%) on Day 32. Cows observed in estrus after the presynchronization step (within 5 days after CIDR removal or within 5 days after the second PGF_2α treatment) had greater P/AI than those not observed in estrus (55/103; 53.4% vs. 60/160; 37.5%; observed vs. not observed; P < 0.01; d 32 pregnancy diagnosis). When progesterone data were examined in a subset of cows (n = 208), 55.3% of cows had a “prototypical” response to treatment (i.e., the cow had an estrous cycle that was synchronized by the presynchronization treatment and then the cow responded appropriately to the subsequent PGF_2α and GnRH treatments before timed AI). Collectively, cows with a prototypical response to either treatment had 52.2% P/AI that was greater (P < 0.001) than the P/AI for cows that had a nonprototypical response (19%) (P/AI determined at 60–90 days of pregnancy). In conclusion, we did not detect a difference in P/AI when postpartum dairy cows were treated with 14dCIDR-PGF_2α or 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch before timed AI. The primary limitation to the success of either program was the failure of the cow to respond appropriately to the sequence of treatments.     

Synchronization rate, size of the ovulatory follicle, and pregnancy rate after synchronization of ovulation beginning on different days of the estrous cycle in lactating dairy cows

Recently a protocol was developed that precisely synchronizes the time of ovulation in lactating dairy cows (Ovsynch; GnRH-7d-PGF2 alpha-2d-GnRH). We evaluated whether initiation of Ovsynch on different days of the estrous cycle altered the effectiveness of this protocol. The percentage of cows (n = 156) ovulating to the first GnRH was 64% and varied (P < 0.01) by stage of estrous cycle. Treatment with PGF2 alpha was effective, with 93% of cows having low progesterone at second GnRH. The overall percentage of cows that ovulated after second GnRH (synchronization rate) was 87% and varied by response to first GnRH (92% if ovulation to first GnRH vs 79% if no ovulation; P < 0.05). There were 6% of cows that ovulated before the second injection of GnRH and 7% with no detectable ovulation by 48 h after second GnRH. Maximal diameter of the ovulatory follicle varied by stage of estrous cycle, with cows in which Ovsynch was initiated at midcycle having the smallest follicles. In addition, milk production and serum progesterone concentration on the day of PGF2 alpha affected (P < 0.05) size of the ovulatory follicle. Using these results we analyzed pregnancy rate at Days 28 and 98 after AI for cows (n = 404) in which Ovsynch was initiated on known days of the estrous cycle. Pregnancy rate was lower for cows expected to ovulate larger follicles than those expected to ovulate smaller follicles (P < 0.05; 32 vs 42%). Thus, although overall synchronization rate with Ovsynch was above 85%, there were clear differences in response according to day of protocol initiation. Cows in which Ovsynch was initiated near midcycle had smaller ovulatory follicles and greater pregnancy rates.     

The effect of addition of equine chorionic gonadotropin to a progesterone-based estrous synchronization protocol in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) under tropical conditions

Poor estrus expression and anestrus decrease the reproductive efficiency of buffaloes. The objective of this study was to determine whether the addition of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) to an estrous synchronization protocol and timed insemination could improve ovulation and pregnancy rates of anestrous buffalo cows under tropical conditions. The study population comprised 65 lactating Murrah buffalo cows which were assigned to CIDR (n = 33) or CIDR + eCG (n = 32) treatment groups. Cows in the CIDR group were fitted for 8 d with a controlled intravaginal drug release (CIDR) device containing 1.38 g progesterone, received GnRH (10 μg i.m.) on D 0, PGF_2α (750 μg i.m.) on D 7, and GnRH (10 μg i.m.) on D 9; whereas cows in the CIDR + eCG group received the same treatment plus eCG (500 IU, i.m.) at the time of PGF_2α treatment. All cows were inseminated 16-20 h after the second GnRH treatment. Blood samples were obtained 10 d before the start of synchronization treatment (Day -10) and at the onset of treatment (Day 0). Cows with plasma progesterone concentrations <1 ng/mL recorded in both samples (Low-Low levels of P4) were classified as non-cyclic cows. Similarly, when either one or both of the sample pair contained concentrations of serum progesterone ≥1 ng/mL (High-High, Low-High, or High-Low levels of P4), the buffaloes were classified as cyclic cows. Ovulation rate, defined as the number of buffaloes with at least one corpus luteum 10 days after insemination, was significantly higher (P = 0.018) in the CIDR + eCG (84.4%) cows than in the CIDR cows (57.6%). Pregnancy rate was numerically lower in CIDR (27.3%) than CIDR + eCG (40.6%) cows, though differences were not significant (P = 0.25). Pregnancy rates for CIDR + eCG cows were similar to that of cows inseminated after natural estrus (40.9%; 29/71). In the non-cyclic animals, higher ovulation rates (P = 0.026) were recorded for the CIDR + eCG (81%) than for the CIDR cows (47.4%). Our results indicate that the addition of eCG to a progesterone-based estrous synchronization regimen substantially improves the ovulation rate in non-cyclic buffaloes. When this treatment is followed by timed AI, pregnancy rates achieved in anestrous buffaloes, whether cyclic and non-cyclic, may approach the rates observed in cows inseminated at natural estrus.     

Ovarian follicular wave synchronization and induction of ovulation in postpartum beef cows

An experiment was designed to evaluate a) the effect of a progesterone-estradiol combined treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics in postpartum beef cows, and b) ovulation and the subsequent luteal activity after short-term calf removal and GnRH agonist treatment. Multiparous Angus cows (25 to 40 d after calving) were assigned to the following treatments: untreated (Control, n = 9); short term calf removal (CR, n = 8); progesterone (CIDR, n = 9) and progesterone plus estradiol-17 beta (CIDR + E-17 beta, n = 9). Progesterone treatment (CIDR) lasted 8 d and the day of device insertion was considered as Day 0. Cows in the CIDR + E-17 beta group also received an i.m. injection of 5 mg of E-17 beta on Day 1. On Day 8, calves were removed for 48 h (CR, CIDR and CIDR + E-17 beta groups) and 6 h before the end of calf removal these cows also received an i.m. injection of 8 micrograms of Busereline (GnRH). Anestrus was confirmed in all cows by the absence of luteal tissue and progesterone concentrations below 1 ng ml-1 at the beginning of the experiment. Although mean (+/- SEM) interval from the beginning of the experiment (Day 0) to wave emergence did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups (Control, 1.9 +/- 1.0, range -2 to 7 d; CR, 3.9 +/- 0.7, range 0 to 6 d; CIDR, 2.8 +/- 0.5, range 0 to 4 d and CIDR + E-17 beta, 4.1 +/- 0.2, range 3 to 5), the variability was less (P < 0.05) in the CIDR + E-17 beta group. The proportion of cows ovulating 24 to 48 h after GnRH administration tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in cows from CIDR + E-17 beta group (8/9) than in those of CR (5/8) or CIDR (6/9) groups, respectively and was associated with a higher proportion (P < 0.05) of CIDR + E-17 beta treated cows (9/9) that had a dominant follicle in the growing/early static phase at the time of GnRH treatment compared to the other GnRH treated groups (5/8, and 4/9 for CR and CIDR groups, respectively). Two CR cows ovulated 0-24 h after GnRH and only one Control cow ovulated the day before the time of GnRH administration. Cows pretreated with progesterone had longer (P < 0.05) luteal lifespan (CIDR, 14.5 +/- 0.7, CIDR + E-17 beta, 13.9 +/- 0.6 d) than those not treated with CIDR (Control, 5, CR, 4.0 +/- 0.4). We conclude that progesterone plus estradiol treatment results in tightly synchronized wave emergence and high GnRH-induced ovulation rate with normal luteal activity in postpartum beef cattle.     

Short estrous cycles and associated serum progesterone levels in beef cows

Short estrous cycles in beef cows were investigated in two experiments. In trial 1, breeding dates from 2,854 fall-calving Angus cows were used to determine the incidence of short estrous cycles. Of 198 cycles of less than 17 days, 170 were between the first and second detected estrus. Estrous cycles of 7 to 10 days occurred more frequently (P<.005) than other short estrous cycles. Eight-day estrous cycles were most frequent. In the second experiment, calves were weaned from 25 of 33 anestrous spring-calving, crossbred Simmental cows. Compared to herdmates still nursing calves, an increased percentage of cows which had calves weaned were observed in estrus within 10 and 25 days after the date of weaning (P<.005) and a higher percentage had 7- to 10-day estrous cycles. Cows that were observed in estrus within 10 days after weaning were inseminated with Angus semen at their first estrus and with Simmental semen at their second estrus. No cows conceived on the first estrus of 7- to 10-day estrous cycles; 61.5% conceived on the second estrus. Serum progesterone was higher (P<.01) before the second estrus than the first.     

Association between leptin single nucleotide polymorphism and reproductive performance of lactating Holstein cows

The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the associations among reproductive performance of Holstein cows, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the R4C locus of the Exon-2 region of the leptin gene and health disorders. Lactating dairy cows (n=814) had their DNA sequenced at the Exon-2 region of the leptin gene to determine the presence of SNP in the R4C locus. Cows had the stage of estrous cycle synchronized with two injections of PGF(2α) 14d apart, with or without a progesterone insert. After the second PGF(2α), cows were either inseminated on detected estrus and, if not inseminated within 13d, cows were submitted to a timed artificial insemination (AI) protocol 13d after the second PGF(2α). Blood was sampled at 35±3, 49±3, and 62±3d in milk (DIM) and cows with progesterone <1.0ng/mL in the first two samples were considered to be anovular, whereas those with at least one of the first two samples with progesterone ≥1.0ng/mL were considered to have initiated estrous cyclicity. Anovular cows with progesterone ≥1.0ng/mL at 62±3DIM were considered to have resumed estrous cyclicity. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 31 and 60d after first postpartum AI and at 42d after subsequent inseminations. Resulting genotypes were CC (34.6%), CT (48.2%), and TT (17.2%). Leptin genotype was associated (P=0.03) with increased prevalence of estrous cyclic cows at 49±3DIM, as TT cows were and tended to be less likely to be estrous cyclic than CC and CT cows, respectively. Other measures of reproductive performance in the first 305DIM were not associated with leptin genotype. Cows diagnosed with at least one postparturient disease were less likely to become pregnant after first (P<0.01) and second (P=0.02) AI and to be pregnant at 305DIM (P<0.01). Furthermore, cows diagnosed with a disease event had a 36% reduction (P<0.001) in the rate of pregnancy, which extended the median interval to pregnancy by 60d. Estrous cyclic cows had a 35% increased rate of pregnancy, which reduced the interval to pregnancy by 34d. Cows homozygous for the T allele were less likely to be cyclic early postpartum, but leptin genotype was not associated with other reproductive responses when cows were subjected to a controlled breeding program.     

Importance of estrus on pregnancy per insemination in suckled Bos indicus cows submitted to estradiol/progesterone-based timed insemination protocols

The objective was to evaluate the effect of estrus occurrence (based on removal of tail-head marks) on ovarian responses and pregnancy per AI (P/AI; 30 d after AI) in suckled Bos indicus beef cows submitted to timed AI (TAI) protocols. Cows received an intravaginal device containing 1.0 g progesterone, and 2.0 mg estradiol benzoate im; 8 d later, the intravaginal device was removed, and they were given PGF_2α (0.25 mg of cloprostenol sodium) and 300 IU of eCG, with TAI 48 to 52 h later. In Experiment 1, cows were assigned to receive one of three treatments: 1 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) im at progesterone (P4) device removal (N = 178); 10 μg of GnRH im at TAI (N = 190); or both treatments (N = 172). In cows given estradiol (ECP or ECP + GnRH), more displayed estrus (P = 0.002) and became pregnant (P < 0.0001) compared with those receiving only GnRH. In Experiment 2, the effect of the occurrence of estrus on ovarian responses was evaluated in cows (N = 53) synchronized using ECP at device removal. Cows that displayed estrus had a greater diameter of the largest follicle (LF) at device removal (P < 0.0001), a greater diameter at TAI (P < 0.0001), a greater ovulation rate (P = 0.02), a larger CL (P = 0.02), and a greater P4 concentration (P < 0.0001) than cows that did not display estrus. In Experiment 3, the effect of GnRH treatment on P/AI at TAI was evaluated in cows that received ECP at device removal, and either displayed, or did not display, estrus (N = 726). There was no estrus by GnRH interaction (P = 0.22); the P/AI was greater (P < 0.0001) in cows that displayed estrus (61.9%) than cows that did not display estrus (41.4%). However, GnRH did not improve (P = 0.81) P/AI (GnRH = 53.7% vs. no GnRH = 52.6%). In conclusion, exogenous estradiol at device removal increased both the proportion of suckled Bos indicus cows that displayed estrus and P/AI. Cows that displayed estrus had better ovarian responses (i.e., larger follicles at TAI, a greater ovulation rate, larger CL, and greater P4 concentrations) following an estradiol/P4-based synchronization protocol. Although occurrence of estrus improved pregnancy outcomes, GnRH at TAI did not improve P/AI in suckled Bos indicus cows treated with ECP, regardless of estrus occurrence.     

Comparison of two estrus synchronization and resynchronization treatments in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive performance in cows following synchronization of estrus with intravaginal progesterone releasing devices (IVD) has varied with the length of treatment, cyclic status and prolonged return to estrus intervals in some cows following first AI. The objective of this study was to compare two methods of synchronizing and resynchronizing estrus on the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. Cows were treated with an IVD (Day 0) for 7 days (n = 350) or 8 days (n = 350), cloprostenol (0.5 mg i.m.) at the time of device removal and estradiol benzoate (EB) at the time of device insertion (1.5mg i.m.), and again 9 days later (1.0 mg i.m.). Cows were also resynchronized starting on Days 23 and 46 by reinsertion of IVDs for either 7 or 8 days and treatment with EB (1mg i.m.) at the time of device insertion and again 9 days later. Cows were inseminated on detection of estrus for 4 days after removal of devices at each of the synchronized estrous cycles. No significant differences in reproductive performance were detected between each treatment throughout the study period. Synchrony of estrus was more precise at the first and second estrus after treatment with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days. Cows classified as anestrous had lower reproductive performance than cows classified as cycling and had longer intervals to estrus at the second (P < 0.001) and third estrus (P < 0.06), but not at the first estrus (P = 0.09). Mean time to onset of estrus after IVD removal was less in cows treated with an IVD for 8 days compared to 7 days at each synchronized estrus (P < 0.01). More Holstein-Friesian cows were classified as non-pregnant and not detected in estrus than crossbreed cows (15.7%, 54/343 versus 9.0%, 24/266; [P < 0.05). The results of the study suggested that the main effects of the treatments that were used to synchronize and resynchronize estrus were to alter the timing and synchrony of estrus without affecting fertility.     

Effect of length of progesterone exposure during ovulatory wave development on pregnancy rate

The objective was to determine the effects of the duration of progesterone exposure during the ovulatory wave on fertility (pregnancy rate) in beef cattle. We tested the hypothesis that short-progesterone exposure during the growing and early-static phase of the ovulatory follicle (analogous to the ovulatory wave of 3-wave cycles) is associated with higher fertility than a longer duration of exposure (analogous to the ovulatory wave of 2-wave cycles). Three to 5 days after ovulation, beef heifers (n = 172) and suckled beef cows (n = 193) were given an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR) and 2.5 mg estradiol - 17β +50 mg progesterone im to induce a new follicular wave. Cattle were allocated to short- or long-progesterone exposure groups (for 3 and 6 d after wave emergence, respectively) after which prostaglandin F_2α was administered and CIDR were removed. Forty-eight hours later, all cattle were given 12.5 mg pLH and artificially inseminated (AI) with frozen-thawed semen. The diameter of the two largest follicles and the corpus luteum were measured by transrectal ultrasonography at CIDR removal, insemination, and 36 h after insemination. Pregnancy diagnosis was done ultrasonically 38 and 65 d post-AI. There was no difference in pregnancy rates in short- vs long-progesterone exposure in heifers (53 vs 47%, P = 0.44) or cows (63 vs 58%, P = 0.51). However, the diameter of the ovulatory follicle at CIDR removal and AI was smaller in short- than in long-progesterone groups (P < 0.02), and larger in cows than in heifers (P < 0.006). In conclusion, short-progesterone exposure during the growing and early-static phase of the ovulatory follicle (similar to 3-wave cycles) was not associated with higher fertility than a longer progesterone exposure (similar to 2-wave cycles).     

Excretion rate of progesterone in milk and faeces in lactating dairy cows with two levels of milk yield.

This study was conducted to measure the effect of the level of daily milk yield on the excretion rate of progesterone (P4) in milk and faeces in high-producing (HP) and low-producing (LP) lactating dairy cows. A GnRH-agonist was implanted to block endogenous production of P4. A CIDR device was inserted into the vagina and left in place for 11 days. The average and peak milk yields were greater in HP cows (P < 0.0001). Mean plasma concentrations of P4 were also similar in both groups (P = 0.44), even though the average mass of P4 delivered from a CIDR device was higher with HP cows (P = 0.02). Average milk P4 concentration was similar in both groups (P = 0.81), so that average daily excretion of P4 in the milk was greater with HP cows (P = 0.05). The concentrations (P = 0.83) and daily yields (P = 0.4) of total faecal progesterone metabolites were not affected by level of milk yield. These data show that the concentrations of plasma and milk P4, and the concentration and yield of P4 metabolites are not affected by the levels of daily milk yield.     

Comparison of fertility,regular returns-to-estrus,and calving interval between Ovsynch and CO-synch + CIDR protocols in dairy cows

The main aims of the present study were to compare the pregnancy rate (PR), regular returns-to-estrus, and calving interval of a CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device, commonly used to synchronize ovulations in beef cows, with the classical Ovsynch protocol in high-producing dairy cows. Holstein-Friesian cows (n = 128) from six commercial dairy herds, ≥40 days postpartum and not previously inseminated, were randomly assigned to one of two treatments. Cows submitted to Ovsynch protocol (group OS as control group; n = 66) received 10 μg of a GnRH analogue 7 days before and 48 hours after 25 mg PGF_2α, followed by artificial insemination (AI) 16 hours after the second GnRH administration. Cows submitted to CO-Synch + CIDR (1.38 g of progesterone) inserted for 7 days beginning at the first GnRH administration (group CoS + CD; n = 62) had the second administration of GnRH concurrent with AI, 64 hours after CIDR removal/PGF_2α administration. Nonpregnant cows with return-to-estrus between 18 and 24 days after first AI were reinseminated (second AI). Logistic regressions were used to analyze PR and returns-to-estrus. No effect of group or herd was observed in PR at first timed AI. However, the sum of cows pregnant at first AI and nonpregnant cows with regular returns-to-estrus and the total PR (first + second AI) were influenced by group treatment. Overall, cows of group CoS + CD (total PR = 56.5%) were 2.1 times more likely to became pregnant after AI and until first regular returns-to-estrus than cows of group OS. The calving interval was lower in group CoS + CD (425.9 ± 78.8 days; ±SD) than in group OS (475.3 ± 83.7 days). The CO-Synch + CIDR protocol was reliable to use in dairy herds and provided reproductive advantages when compared with Ovsynch protocol.