Reconstruction of disturbance history of a typical broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis forest and mechanisms of disturbance occurrence

该文依托于小兴安岭典型阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林9 hm2森林动态监测样地,对样地内林窗边缘主要树种红松和臭冷杉(Abies nephrolepis)进行生长释放判定分析,重建了冠层树木的干扰历史。结果表明:整体上林窗木与非林窗木的生长变化百分率变化规律基本一致,而不同林窗间生长变化百分率存在明显的差异,林窗干扰及其产生的影响存在较大的变异性。在1733–1738、1748–1752、1769–1771、1798–1801、1827–1833、1841–1844、1935–1939及1968–1973年间红松生长释放较强,其中1752、1770、1800、1830、1842、1937及1970年出现了明显的干扰峰;在1889–1904、1932–1938、1947–1973和1986–2005年间臭冷杉生长释放较强,其中1894、1934、1951、1968和1990年出现了明显的干扰峰。红松干扰存在2.0 a、3.5 a、3.8 a、7.3–7.9 a和9.1–18.2 a的显著周期,臭冷杉干扰存在3.5–3.6 a、7.5–48.8 a和65–85 a的显著周期。风干扰是典型阔叶红松林干扰释放的主要因子,异常温度也影响该地区树木生长释放事件。太阳活动通过影响局地风速、温度、降水等气候因子以及其他大尺度气候模态影响林窗动态,可能是小兴安岭典型阔叶红松林的干扰机制之一。     

林隙干扰和升温对小兴安岭红松和臭冷杉径向生长的影响

通过建立小兴安岭阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林内林隙与非林隙红松、臭冷杉(Abies nephrolepis)轮宽年表,分析林隙干扰(微环境差异)和1980年后显著升温对树木径向生长的影响。结果表明:升温减缓了非林隙红松生长,却加快了林隙红松生长;升温后,非林隙红松受温度影响减弱,而林隙红松则增强,林隙和非林隙红松径向生长与帕默尔干旱指数(Palmer drought severity index,PDSI)均由负相关变为正相关;林隙干扰导致臭冷杉径向生长减缓,升温导致林隙与非林隙臭冷杉年生长量均下降了约50%,非林隙木对温度的负响应要高于林隙木;升温后,5—10月温度对非林隙木抑制作用明显,非生长季(1—5月)降水对非林隙臭冷杉的抑制作用加强,而对林隙臭冷杉则由抑制变为促进;PDSI与非林隙臭冷杉由升温前的负相关变为升温后的正相关,而林隙臭冷杉则负相关更显著;林隙干扰减少耐荫喜湿树木径向生长,而对阳性树种影响不大或略有增加;林隙木比非林隙木更易受外界环境变化的影响,林隙干扰可使喜湿耐荫树种提前适应暖干环境,以提高了对升温适应性;升温导致林隙木与非林隙木年轮气候响应差异变大。     

冻融期去根处理对小兴安岭6种林型土壤微生物量的影响

春季冻融期,在小兴安岭的阔叶红松(Pinus koraiensis)林、谷地云冷杉(Picea koraiensis-Abies nephrolepis)林、阔叶红松择伐林、白桦(Betula platyphylla)次生林、红松人工林、兴安落叶松(Larix gmelinii)人工林的去根处理样地和对照样地进行野外取土实验,分析了根去除对上述林型土壤微生物量的影响以及与土壤环境因子的关系。结果表明:冻融循环期间对照样地和去根处理样地的林型、土壤层次、取样时间均显著地影响土壤微生物量碳(MBC)(P0.05),对照样地中各林型的土壤微生物量氮(MBN)差异显著,而去根处理样地中各林型的MBN没有显著差异(P0.05);冻融循环期间去根处理显著地减少了大部分林型及土层(谷地云冷杉林0—10 cm及择伐林外)的MBC,而去根处理对大部分林型及土层(阔叶红松林0—10 cm,谷地云冷杉林和择伐林的10—20 cm除外)的MBN没有显著影响。说明在小兴安岭春季冻融期根系对土壤微生物量的影响不可忽视。     

黑河胜山国家自然保护区红松和红皮云杉 生长释放判定及解释

在黑龙江胜山国家自然保护区实验区的阔叶红松林内随机设置3个样方,采用生长变化百分率与前一年径向生长的相互关系建立生长释放界限标准曲线,对样地内所有胸径大于10 cm的红松(Pinus koraiensis)和红皮云杉(Picea koraiensis)进行生长释放判定分析。结果表明:前一年的径向生长对释放事件的判定很重要。无论是从年轮宽度变化还是生长变化百分率曲线上看,红皮云杉在各样方的所有样本变化都具有较强的一致性,而红松可能是由于受微环境的影响,一致性相对略差一点。几乎所有红松样本都有过至少1次释放,单株平均释放个数为2.75次,且87.5%的样本有过至少1次主要释放;红皮云杉由于年轮序列比较短,释放比率相对较低,平均释放个数为0.92次,41.7%的样本有过1次以上主要释放。两树种释放事件的年份主要发生在1930-1960年和1970-1990年两个时间段内。通过对样方中幼树的更新状况、树木年轮相关系数与个体间距之间的关系及温度、降水变化分析得出:风、火等干扰产生的林窗、微环境变化、温度和降水等气候因素都可能是产生生长释放的原因。     

小兴安岭5种林型土壤呼吸时空变异

原始阔叶红松林、谷地云冷杉林、阔叶红松择伐林、次生白桦林、人工落叶松林是小兴安岭乃至东北地区的重要森林类型。采用红外气体分析法比较测定了这几种森林类型的土壤呼吸及其相关环境因子,分析探讨了这几种森林类型土壤呼吸的时空变异。结果表明:各林型土壤呼吸与5 cm深土壤温度(T5)呈显著的指数相关,并且土壤呼吸与土壤温度、土壤湿度及其相互作用的回归模型可以解释各林型土壤呼吸约71%的季节变异。生长季平均土壤呼吸速率为次生白桦林(3.59μmolCO.2m-.2s-1)>谷地云冷杉林(3.52μmolCO.2m-.2s-1)>阔叶红松择伐林(3.44μmolCO.2m-.2s-1)>原始阔叶红松林(2.58μmolCO.2m-.2s-1)>人工落叶松林(2.29μmolCO.2m-.2s-1),说明土壤呼吸对原始阔叶红松林人为干扰的响应是不同的。各林型Q10值介于1.84(人工落叶松林)—2.32(次生白桦林)之间。在整个生长季,各林型之间土壤呼吸的变异系数变化幅度为19.74%—37.39%,而各林型内土壤环间其变化幅度为32.13%—60.20%,显著大于样地间的变化幅度14.28%—35.70%(P<0.001),说明土壤呼吸在细微尺度上的差异更大。土壤湿度可以解释各林型(阔叶红松林除外)内部土壤呼吸15.8%—33.5%的空间异质性。     

亚高山云冷杉混交林树木生长释放与干扰分析

对云南碧塔海亚高山云冷杉林内４个样地冠层树木的生长压制和释放的历史,用树木年轮分析方法进行了重建,然后根据生长释放频率推测林冠干扰强度（每１０年冠层树木的死亡百分率）。４个林分（１个中龄林,３个成过熟林）生长释放的平均百分率为４８％～９２％。中龄林内,平均生长释放频率为７１％／１０ａ,成过熟林则为７４％～９５％／１０ａ,在油麦吊云杉〔Ｐｉｃｅａｂｒａｃｈｙｔｙｌａｖａｒ．ｃｏｍｐｌａｎａｔａ（Ｍａｓｔ．）ＣｈｅｎｇｅｘＲｅｈｄ．〕占优势的林分和大果红杉（Ｌａｒｉｘｐｏｔａｎｉｎｉｖａｒ．ｍａｃｒｏｃａｒｐａＬａｗ）油麦吊云杉混交林分内,估测的林冠干扰强度分别为４８％／１０ａ和５９％／１０ａ。     

长白山自然保护区阔叶红松林林隙干扰状况的研究

 本文研究了长白山自然保护区阔叶红松林林隙干扰的基本规律,得到了描述林隙干扰状况的一些重要参数。结果表明扩展林隙在阔叶红松林中所占的面积比例是27.36％,而实际林隙所占的面积比例为13.05％,林隙干扰的频率每年约为0.15％;林隙的分布格局是均匀式的。形成林隙最重要的方式是掘根风倒,其次为干基折断;大多数的林隙都是由1～4株形成木形成的,林隙形成木主要是由红松、水曲柳、蒙古栎和紫椴组成;阔叶红松林的主林层乔木在直径为40～60cm和高度为25～30m时,形成林隙的可能性最大。     

受干扰长白山阔叶红松林林分组成及冠层结构特征

通过样地调查对不同干扰方式产生的过伐天然林、次生白桦林和人工落叶松林等群落的结构组成进行分析和分类探讨 ,并选取了林窗片断和叶面积指数两个能表示群落冠层结构的指标进行分析。结果表明 ,林窗片断值分别为 :原始阔叶红松林 0 194、原始阔叶类 0 185、结构转换型 0 315、结构保留型 0 36 3、结构破坏型 0 2 35、严重干扰类型 0 5 5 0、次生白桦林0 2 13和人工落叶松林 0 2 2 7;叶面积指数分别为 :原始阔叶红松林 1 76 6、原始阔叶类 1 6 80、结构转换型 1 2 5 0、结构保留型 1 0 2 8、结构破坏型 1 5 5 0、严重干扰类型 0 6 35、次生白桦林1 731和人工落叶松林 1 4 73。     

树轮分析用于森林干扰强度推测的实例研究

树木年轮生长释放一直广泛应用于重建森林干扰,但没有直接的研究证明利用树木年轮分析建立的干扰强度的可靠程度,本文试图通过一个取自青海省互助国家森林公园(1987年经历过择伐)的样方进行验证.在40m×50m的青扦林样方内取胸径≥5cm的树木(124株)树轮芯样并测定胸径、树高和择伐后山杨(PopulusdavilianaDode)树桩(55个)的基径以及树木与树桩的距离.分析结果表明1987和1988年树木生长释放百分率为38.7%,与该林分的准确干扰强度37.7%(树桩基部断面积与该断面积加树木胸高断面积之和的比值)相接近.1980～1989年10a间树木生长释放百分率为62.9%,该10a间的平均干扰强度为37.0%(生长释放百分率62.9%/生长释放平均次数1.7),也接近于该林分的准确干扰强度,因而用树轮资料重建森林干扰强度是可行和可靠的.     

长白山温带森林不同演替阶段群落结构特征

原始阔叶红松林是长白山西部地区的地带性顶级植被类型, 经采伐干扰或火烧破坏后形成大面积次生林。参照CTFS (Centre for Tropical Forest Science)样地建设技术规范, 于2005~2007年, 在长白山地区典型次生杨桦林、次生针阔混交林和椴树红松林内各建立了5.2 hm²固定监测样地。调查并鉴定了样地内胸径大于1 cm的木本植物, 初步分析了森林监测样地的群落组成和种群结构, 并应用双相关函数g(r)分析了样地内5个优势树种的空间分布。结果表明: 次生杨桦林样地共监测木本植物32种, 20 949株活个体, 隶属于13科21属。次生针阔混交林样地共监测木本植物31个种, 14 725株活个体, 隶属于12科20属。椴树红松林样地共监测木本植物20个种, 12 062株活个体, 隶属于11科13属。次生杨桦林、次生针阔混交林及椴树红松林中胸径大于1 cm的木本植物胸高断面积之和分别为24.74、32.07和56.64 m²·hm^-2。紫椴(Tilia amurensis)是长白山针阔混交林带的重要组成树种, 其重要值、胸高断面积在3个森林监测样地内均居于前列。白桦(Betula platyphylla)、山杨(Populus daviana)重要值和胸高断面积在次生杨桦林内均处于优势地位, 而在椴树红松林内优势地位为红松(Pinus koraiensis)等顶级树种所取代。次生杨桦林和次生针阔混交林中, 红松、色木槭(Acer mono)、臭松(Abies nephrolepis)、鱼鳞松(Picea jezoensis)和紫椴的径级结构均呈倒J型分布; 而椴树红松林内, 红松和紫椴的径级结构则呈单峰分布, 色木槭、臭松和鱼鳞松呈倒J型分布。g(r)分析表明长白山森林监测样地内5个优势树种的空间格局以聚集分布为主, 聚集强度在同种个体周围(r≤4 m)达到最大, 随着距离增加, 聚集强度逐渐减小。次生林中树种空间格局的环境解释量较高, 而椴树红松林中环境因子对树种空间分布的解释能力较差。     

基于长时间序列Landsat影像的南方人工林干扰与恢复制图分析

基于1986年到2011年的Landsat影像,以南方人工林分布区域广东省佛冈县为例,运用Landsat生态系统自适应处理系统(LEDAPS)预处理生成标准的地面反射率数据构建Landsat时间序列堆栈(LTSS)用于Land Trendr算法监测人工林森林干扰与恢复的长时间序列变化,分析了连续24a森林干扰的年份变化、干扰量以及干扰持续的时间,验证了算法识别干扰的精度,并探讨了人工林干扰的驱动力。结果表明佛冈县的森林干扰较为剧烈,一般都在1000 hm~2。而1987、2002、2004、2005、2006、2007和2009年的干扰面积均超过2000 hm~2,其中1987、2007年两年的干扰面积达到6000 hm~2以上。相比森林干扰的变化,佛冈县的森林恢复面积随时间的变化相对平稳。通过对佛冈县森林干扰和恢复面积的趋势分析,发现20世纪80年代末到90年代森林干扰和恢复的面积基本少于2000年以后的变化面积,变化趋势比2000年以后的显得平缓;从2000年开始,森林干扰面积逐渐上升,总体面积变化趋势高于森林的恢复,但森林的恢复面积仍有所提升。其中,佛冈县的森林干扰持续1a时间的面积比例约38%,持续2a时间约28%,持续3a时间约25%,持续4a时间约7%,主要为短期急剧的干扰事件。另外,持续时间为4a以上的森林干扰和恢复的面积在佛冈县不超过100hm~2。2000年之前持续干扰和急剧干扰面积相当,变化比较平缓;到2000年之后,急剧干扰的面积远大于持续干扰,最高约达2800 hm~2,但两者都呈现波动上升的变化趋势。在选取的两个4km~2的样方中,基于影像光谱识别以及通过比对干扰资料的可视化验证方法表明算法结果与真实地表的解译信息较吻合,误差约为0.1km~2。利用长时间序列遥感影像进行森林干扰的自动化监测十分必要,导出的定性、定位与定量信息,一方面为可持续的森林经营奠定基础,另一方面为评价森林生产力与森林碳储量提供有效的数据支撑。     

森林干扰生态研究

陆地上80％的生态系统都已受到了来自人类和自然的各种干扰,森林生态系统也不例外．在各种干扰作用下,尤其是人类不合理的干扰导致世界范围内的森林退化／衰退已成为一个十分严峻的事实,因此,以维持、恢复森林生态系统固有的多种功能为基础,实现高效、稳定、可持续就成为经营森林生态系统的总目标．随着干扰的加剧,近年来生态学界更加关注的是“受干扰”生态系统的研究．干扰对森林生态系统主要生态过程的影响以及森林生态系统对干扰的响应等问题,已成为森林生态研究领域的国际前沿与热点．因此,系统地研究干扰条件下森林生态系统的生态过程,并在此基础上确立干扰森林的经营理论与技术,对中国天然林资源保护等林业工程实施及国家生态安全建设具有重要的科学和现实意义．本文在广泛收集国内外有关森林干扰研究结果的基础上,总结了森林干扰的基本概念,分析了干扰与森林经营的关系,探讨了森林干扰研究领域所涉及的内容和关注的基础问题,提出了森林干扰生态研究的主要内容与方向,对今后干扰森林生态研究和中国天然林保护等林业工程建设具有参考价值．     

Significant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950

Over the last decades, the natural disturbance is increasingly putting pressure on European forests. Shifts in disturbance regimes may compromise forest functioning and the continuous provisioning of ecosystem services to society, including their climate change mitigation potential. Although forests are central to many European policies, we lack the long-term empirical data needed for thoroughly understanding disturbance dynamics, modeling them, and developing adaptive management strategies. Here, we present a unique database of >170,000 records of ground-based natural disturbance observations in European forests from 1950 to 2019. Reported data confirm a significant increase in forest disturbance in 34 European countries, causing on an average of 43.8 million m³ of disturbed timber volume per year over the 70-year study period. This value is likely a conservative estimate due to under-reporting, especially of small-scale disturbances. We used machine learning techniques for assessing the magnitude of unreported disturbances, which are estimated to be between 8.6 and 18.3 million m³/year. In the last 20 years, disturbances on average accounted for 16% of the mean annual harvest in Europe. Wind was the most important disturbance agent over the study period (46% of total damage), followed by fire (24%) and bark beetles (17%). Bark beetle disturbance doubled its share of the total damage in the last 20 years. Forest disturbances can profoundly impact ecosystem services (e.g., climate change mitigation), affect regional forest resource provisioning and consequently disrupt long-term management planning objectives and timber markets. We conclude that adaptation to changing disturbance regimes must be placed at the core of the European forest management and policy debate. Furthermore, a coherent and homogeneous monitoring system of natural disturbances is urgently needed in Europe, to better observe and respond to the ongoing changes in forest disturbance regimes.     

Temporal patterns of forest seedling emergence across different disturbance histories

1. Forest ecosystems experience a myriad of natural and anthropogenic disturbances that shape ecological communities. Seedling emergence is a critical, preliminary stage in the recovery of forests post​ disturbance and is triggered by a series of abiotic and biotic changes. However, the long‐term influence of different disturbance histories on patterns of seedling emergence is poorly understood.
2. Here, we address this research gap by using an 11‐year dataset gathered between 2009 and 2020 to quantify the influence of different histories of natural (wildfire) and anthropogenic (clearcut and postfire salvage logging) disturbances on emerging seedlings in early‐successional Mountain Ash forests in southeastern Australia. We also describe patterns of seedling emergence across older successional forests varying in stand age (stands that regenerated in <1900s, 1939, 1970–90, and 2007–11).
3. Seedling emergence was highest in the first three years post disturbance. Stand age and disturbance history significantly influenced the composition and abundance of plant seedlings. Specifically, in salvage‐logged forests, plant seedlings were the most different from similarly aged forests with other disturbance histories. For instance, relative to clearcut and unlogged, burnt forests of the same age, salvage logging had the lowest overall richness, the lowest counts of Acacia seedlings, and an absence of common species including Acacia obliquinervia, Acacia frigescens, Cassinia arcuealta, Olearia argophylla, Pimelea axiflora, Polyscias sambucifolia, and Prosanthera melissifolia over the survey period.
4. Synthesis: Our findings provide important new insights into the influence of different disturbance histories on regenerating forests and can help predict plant community responses to future disturbances, which may influence forest recovery under altered disturbance regimes.

     

Forest disturbance and recovery in Peruvian Amazonia

Amazonian forests function as biomass and biodiversity reservoirs, contributing to climate change mitigation. While they continuously experience disturbance, the effect that disturbances have on biomass and biodiversity over time has not yet been assessed at a large scale. Here, we evaluate the degree of recent forest disturbance in Peruvian Amazonia and the effects that disturbance, environmental conditions and human use have on biomass and biodiversity in disturbed forests. We integrate tree-level data on aboveground biomass (AGB) and species richness from 1840 forest plots from Peru's National Forest Inventory with remotely sensed monitoring of forest change dynamics, based on disturbances detected from Landsat-derived Normalized Difference Moisture Index time series. Our results show a clear negative effect of disturbance intensity tree species richness. This effect was also observed on AGB and species richness recovery values towards undisturbed levels, as well as on the recovery of species composition towards undisturbed levels. Time since disturbance had a larger effect on AGB than on species richness. While time since disturbance has a positive effect on AGB, unexpectedly we found a small negative effect of time since disturbance on species richness. We estimate that roughly 15% of Peruvian Amazonian forests have experienced disturbance at least once since 1984, and that, following disturbance, have been increasing in AGB at a rate of 4.7 Mg ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ during the first 20 years. Furthermore, the positive effect of surrounding forest cover was evident for both AGB and its recovery towards undisturbed levels, as well as for species richness. There was a negative effect of forest accessibility on the recovery of species composition towards undisturbed levels. Moving forward, we recommend that forest-based climate change mitigation endeavours consider forest disturbance through the integration of forest inventory data with remote sensing methods.     

Unraveling the drivers of intensifying forest disturbance regimes in Europe

Natural disturbances like wildfire, windthrow and insect outbreaks are critical drivers of composition, structure and functioning of forest ecosystems. They are strongly climate‐sensitive, and are thus likely to be distinctly affected by climatic changes. Observations across Europe show that in recent decades, forest disturbance regimes have intensified markedly, resulting in a strong increase in damage from wind, bark beetles and wildfires. Climate change is frequently hypothesized as the main driving force behind this intensification, but changes in forest structure and composition associated with management activities such as promoting conifers and increasing standing timber volume (i.e. ‘forest change’) also strongly influence susceptibility to disturbances. Here, we show that from 1958 to 2001, forest change contributed in the same order of magnitude as climate change to the increase in disturbance damage in Europe's forests. Climate change was the main driver of the increase in area burnt, while changes in forest extent, structure and composition particularly affected the variation in wind and bark beetle damage. For all three disturbance agents, damage was most severe when conducive weather conditions and increased forest susceptibility coincided. We conclude that a continuing trend towards more disturbance‐prone conditions is likely for large parts of Europe's forests, and can have strong detrimental effects on forest carbon storage and other ecosystem services. Understanding the interacting drivers of natural disturbance regimes is thus a prerequisite for climate change mitigation and adaptation in forest ecosystem management.     

树木年轮在干扰历史重建中的应用

干扰是影响森林生态系统结构和功能的重要因子,重建森林群落干扰历史可以掌握干扰发生的机制和规律,对森林经营有重要意义。年轮记载了树木逐年的生长历史,利用年轮可以重建不同尺度上干扰的时空格局,具有重建历史长、定年准确和材料容易获得的优点,是森林动态历史研究不可替代的资料。干扰对树木个体的影响可以分为伤害干扰和生长干扰两种类型。不同类型的干扰的特点和对树木的生长影响不同所以重建方法也不同,对树干造成直接伤害的干扰可以利用树干的疤痕重建,如火灾和泥石流等;生长干扰对树木的生长势造成影响,可以通过识别年轮中的生长抑制和释放发生和持续的时间来确定干扰的时间和强度。但是对破坏性的干扰事件要通过群落中个体的建成时间高峰来判断。欧洲和北美地区利用树木年轮重建森林干扰历史的研究已经很广泛,主要包括火灾、虫灾、地质灾害和气象灾害等干扰类型,在中国利用年轮重建群落干扰的研究还处于起步阶段。本文探讨了应用树木年轮重建不同森林干扰事件的方法,总结了不同的重建方法和干扰重建取得的进展,并指出了以后研究的方向,为以后的干扰重建提供了参考。     

High abundance of an exotic amphipod indicates disturbance in tropical rainforests

Previous studies have proposed terrestrial amphipods as potential bioindicators of forest condition. In order to investigate the response of the exotic terrestrial amphipod Talitroides topitotum (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Talitridae) to anthropogenic disturbances and its potential as a bioindicator, we compared its abundance among three forest reserves in southeastern Brazil, under different types and intensities of disturbance. We observed significantly higher abundances in disturbed sites compared to undisturbed sites in two of the reserves sampled, corroborating previous studies. In the third reserve, in which both forest disturbance and the abundance of amphipods were much lower than in the other two reserves, there was no significant difference between the sampling sites. We also speculate about the potential use of terrestrial amphipods as global indicators of forest disturbance.     

Interaction of multiple disturbances: importance of disturbance interval in the effects of fire on rehabilitating mined areas

Abstract Multiple disturbance regimes are increasingly common as novel anthropogenic disturbances are added to existing natural disturbances. However, it is generally unknown whether simultaneous or sequential effects of different forms of disturbance are predictable from the independent effects of each disturbance. This study examines the short‐term effects of sequential disturbance by mineral sand‐mining followed by fire in a forest community in south‐eastern Australia. Four combinations of disturbance were sampled: unburned mined, burned mined, unburned forest (unmined) and burned forest (unmined, with between‐fire interval matching the disturbance interval between mining and fire of the burned mined treatment). All combinations were sampled approximately 12 months following fire on the burned sites. The impact of fire after mining depended on disturbance interval. Sites burned 0.5–2.4 years since mining had fewer native vascular plant species than unburned mined sites of the same mined age, whereas sites with 10–16 years or 20–26 years between mining and fire had greater native species richness than unburned mined sites of the same age. Burning 20–26 years after mining brought native species richness within the range of burned forest. For both unmined and mined sites native seedling densities increased with burning, and with longer disturbance intervals. Weed species richness and weed seedling densities were greater on mined sites than in forest, and burning mined sites elevated weed seedling densities further, particularly for short intervals. Both disturbance interval and fire intensity are likely to have contributed to these results, as intensity on mined areas increased with interval, and at 20–26 years post‐mining was equivalent to unmined forest. These results suggest that fire could be used to promote rehabilitation of these mined areas after at least 10 years, but should be excluded from earlier stages of post‐mining regeneration. However, other sources of spatial and temporal variability should be considered in addition to interval and intensity, as variation among mined areas was correlated with post‐fire weather conditions and available weed sources. Finally, the combined effects of mining and fire could not be predicted from knowledge of the disturbances operating separately, indicating that effects of multiple disturbance may be synergistic rather than additive.