蓝藻生物钟分子机理的研究进展

蓝藻是具有内源性生物钟的简单生物.虽然蓝藻生物钟具有跟真核生物同样的基础特征,但其相关基因和蛋白质与真核生物没有同源性.蓝藻生物钟的核心是kai基因簇及其编码的蛋白KaiA,KaiB和KaiC.这三种Kai蛋白相互作用调节KaiC的磷酸化状态,从而产生昼夜节律信息.KaiC的磷酸化循环是昼夜节律的起博器,调控包括kai基因在内的相关基因的节律性表达.组氨酸蛋白激酶的磷酸化传递可将环境信息输入和将节律信息输出生物钟核心.     

蓝藻生物钟信号输出途径分子机制的研究进展

昼夜节律生物钟包括信号输入途径、核心振荡器和信号输出途径。在生物钟振荡周期与环境信号的同步过程中,信号输入途径感应外界环境的时间变化信号致使生物钟振荡周期和环境同步,并将其输入途径接受的外界信息传递给核心振荡器,核心振荡器再通过不同输出途径将周期性时间信号传递出去,产生周期性的信号调控作用。主要对蓝藻生物钟已知的三条主要输出途径KaiC-SasA-RpaA、KaiC-LabARpaA和KaiC-CikA-RpaA及其相关调节因子的分子机制研究进展进行综述。     

昆虫生物钟分子调控研究进展

昆虫生物钟节律的研究是人类了解生物节律的重要途径。昆虫在生理和行为上具有广泛的节律活动,如运动、睡眠、学习记忆、交配、嗅觉等节律活动,其中昼夜活动行为节律的研究广泛而深入。昆虫乃至高等动物普遍具有保守的昼夜节律系统,昼夜生物钟节律主要包括输入系统:用于接受外界光和温度等环境信号并传入核心振荡器,使得生物时钟与环境同步;核心时钟系统:自我维持的昼夜振荡器;输出系统:将生物钟产生的信号传递出去而控制生物行为和生理的节律变化。早期分子和遗传学研究主要关注昼夜节律振荡器的分子机制及神经生物学,阐明了昼夜生物钟节律的主要分子机制及相关神经网络。最近更多的研究关注生物钟信号是如何输入和输出。本文以果蝇运动节律的相关研究为主要内容,围绕生物钟输入系统、振荡器、输出系统这3个组成部分对昆虫生物钟研究进展进行总结。     

铜绿微囊藻生物钟蛋白KaiA的自身相互作用研究

正蓝藻虽为原核生物,但它也和真核生物一样具有生物钟,它的固氮作用、光合作用、氨基酸吸收、细胞分裂以及基因表达等生理代谢过程都受到生物钟的调控,具有昼夜节律性。虽然蓝藻生物钟和真核生物钟一样,都以近24h的周期运行,都具有温度补偿效应,光、温等环境因素都能重置生物钟的时相,但组成蓝藻生物钟的钟蛋白与真核生物钟蛋白间不具有任何同源性,蓝藻生物钟的计时机制也与真核生物钟存在差异1-2。蓝藻钟基因为一个基因簇kai,由三个基因kaiA、kaiB、kaiC以单一拷贝成簇排列,Kai蛋白组成蓝藻生物钟的核心即中央振荡器,其中kaiC蛋白的磷酸化状态是中央振荡器产生周期性震荡的关键,它决定中央振荡器的时相,而kaiC的磷酸化状态则受到kaiA和kaiB的调节。kaiA是接受和整合环境信息的钟蛋白,具有N-端和C-端两个结构域,N-端缺乏保守天冬氨酰残基的伪接受域能通过与输入途径的某种蛋白(目前未知)发生相互作用而感受环境信号       

蓝藻生物节律性分子调控机制的研究进展

生物钟现象是一种普遍存在于生物界细胞的内源节律性保持机制。生物钟机制的存在可以使生物体的代谢行为产生并维持以24 h为周期的昼夜节律,从而更好地适应于地球自转所产生的环境条件昼夜间节律性变化。蓝藻是目前生物钟分子机制研究中的模式生物,其依赖于k ai基因家族成员的核心生物钟调控模式已经被众多研究者详细阐明。蓝藻生物钟的核心振荡器是由蓝藻k aiA/B/C的编码产物来调控的,Kai蛋白的表达模式具有节律性。KaiC蛋白磷酸化状态的节律性循环及输入、输出途径相关组成蛋白的翻译后修饰状态节律性循环共同组成其反馈回路,负责维持生物钟节律性振荡的持续进行并与环境周期保持同步。传统的蓝藻生物钟分子机制模型认为,节律性表达基因翻译产物的转录/翻译负反馈抑制环是生物节律性维持和输出的关键。遗憾的是,在其它物种生物钟分子机制研究中未发现由kai基因家族成员同源基因组成的节律性标签,这表明以k aiA/B/C为核心振荡器的生物钟系统并不是一种跨物种保守的生物钟系统。近期,人们发现非转录/翻译依赖的振荡器(NTO)也具有成为生物节律性产生和维持的“源动力”的可能。过氧化物氧化还原酶(PRX)氧化还原状态节律性是第一种被报道的跨物种保守的NTO节律性标签,这也日渐成为蓝藻生物钟分子机制研究新的热点。     

光对植物生物钟的调节

植物中的许多生理和生化反应都表现出一种内源的近似于24小时的昼夜节律现象,这些昼夜节律现象受生物钟的调节。高等植物的生物钟系统由输入途径、中央振荡器、输出途径以及一个阀门效应器组成。光信号通过光敏色素和隐花色素进入生物钟,使中央振荡器产生振荡,改变生物钟的输出信号,引起各种生理反应。本文综述了光信号对高等植物生物钟的调节作用和转导途径。     

植物生物钟及其调控生长发育的研究进展

作为植物细胞内部的授时机制, 生物钟系统主要包括信号输入、核心振荡器和信号输出3个主要部分。该系统通过感受外界光照和温度等环境因子的昼夜周期性变化动态, 协调植物生长发育、代谢与生理反应, 赋予植物对生存环境的适应性。植物生物钟系统的核心振荡器通过多层级调控复杂的下游信号转导网络来参与调节植物生长发育及对生物与非生物胁迫的适应性。该文概述了近年来生物钟核心振荡器及其调控植物生长发育过程诸方面的研究进展, 并初步提出了植物时间生物学研究领域一些亟待解决的科学问题, 以期为生物钟领域的研究成果在作物分子育种方面的利用提供理论借鉴。     

光对植物生物钟的调节

植物中的许多生理和生化反应都表现出一种内源的近似于24小时的昼夜节律现象,这些昼夜节律现象受生物钟的调节.高等植物的生物钟系统由输入途径、中央振荡器、输出途径以及一个阀门效应器组成.光信号通过光敏色素和隐花色素进入生物钟,使中央振荡器产生振荡,改变生物钟的输出信号,引起各种生理反应.本文综述了光信号对高等植物生物钟的调节作用和转导途径.     

粗糙脉孢菌及其他真菌中生物钟系统研究进展

地球自转形成的昼夜交替促使地球上的生物在体内进化出了能够测量时间的"生物钟"系统,此系统由输入途径、核心振荡器和输出途径3部分组成。"光逃避"假说为生物钟的进化提供了一种合理的解释。作为研究生物钟的理想模式生物之一,粗糙脉孢菌生物钟的核心振荡器是由正调控因子WC-1、WC-2和负调控因子FRQ、FRH组成的一个基于转录/翻译的负反馈调控环路。输入途径感知光照、温度等环境信号并将其传递到核心振荡器,进而调控下游一系列钟控基因表达,输出昼夜节律。此外,粗糙脉孢菌中还存在不依赖于WC复合体的frq基因的转录,其调控方式的解析进一步丰富了生物钟的调控网络。最后,通过比较并探索其他真菌中生物钟系统组成及运行机制,使我们对真菌生物钟的进化历程及生物体对环境的整体适应性有了更加全面而深刻的认识。     

蓝藻生物钟核心振荡器的KaiB-KaiC相互作用机制

蓝藻是已知的具有昼夜节律生物钟调控机制的最简单生物,其生物钟的核心是一个由三个蛋白质(Kai A、Kai B、Kai C)组成的,不依赖于转录翻译水平调控的核心振荡器.研究表明这三个蛋白质仅在体外试管中反应就会表现出周期性磷酸化振荡现象.分子水平研究表明:Kai A加速Kai C的自磷酸化,而Kai B抑制Kai A使Kai C去磷酸化,从而Kai C的磷酸化/去磷酸化形成周期性反复.但是Kai B如何与Kai A,Kai C相互作用,目前还不清楚.本文重点介绍了最近几年来在Kai B-Kai C相互作用机制上的研究进展,并结合我们的一些初步研究,对Kai B-Kai C相互作用的关键问题进行展望,以期为该体系的深入研究提供参考.     

Review of the Dual-Clock Control of Tidal Rhythms and the Hypothesis that the Same Clock Governs Both Circatidal and Circadian Rhythms

Discoveries first published in 1986 did not fit the de rigueur working hypothesis that the clocks governing tide-associated rhythms had a fundamental period of 12.4 h, a value equal to the average interval between successive tides on most coastlines of the world. To explain the results a dual-clock schema was fashioned that envisioned two clocks, strongly coupled together 180° antiphase, each running at a basic rate of 24.8 h (the interval of a lunar day), as the driving agents of tide-associated rhythms (details are given in the text). This elaboration has been named the circalunidian-clock hypothesis, a hypocorism used in some armchair ruminations back in 1973. In the decade since 1986, a goodly amount of evidence has been garnered that is consistent with this hypothesis—suggesting that first-call divination appears to have been visionary. Acceptance of this hypothesis leads to further cerebration that a 24.8-h clock, its circa periods in constant conditions, and other properties—which fully overlap with our perception of the circadian clock that drives daily rhythms—may indicate that circadian and circalunidan timepieces are not different entities. The known properties of both daily and lunar clock-types are compared and contrasted, and, with the exception of one feature (for which there is at least a philosophical explanation), it is concluded that the same clock that drives tidal rhythms could also motor daily rhythms, i.e., there may be no such thing as a 12.4-h horologue.     

Review of the Dual-Clock Control of Tidal Rhythms and the Hypothesis that the Same Clock Governs Both Circatidal and Circadian Rhythms

Discoveries first published in 1986 did not fit the de rigueur working hypothesis that the clocks governing tide-associated rhythms had a fundamental period of 12.4 h, a value equal to the average interval between successive tides on most coastlines of the world. To explain the results a dual-clock schema was fashioned that envisioned two clocks, strongly coupled together 180° antiphase, each running at a basic rate of 24.8 h (the interval of a lunar day), as the driving agents of tide-associated rhythms (details are given in the text). This elaboration has been named the circalunidian-clock hypothesis, a hypocorism used in some armchair ruminations back in 1973. In the decade since 1986, a goodly amount of evidence has been garnered that is consistent with this hypothesis—suggesting that first-call divination appears to have been visionary. Acceptance of this hypothesis leads to further cerebration that a 24.8-h clock, its circa periods in constant conditions, and other properties—which fully overlap with our perception of the circadian clock that drives daily rhythms—may indicate that circadian and circalunidan timepieces are not different entities. The known properties of both daily and lunar clock-types are compared and contrasted, and, with the exception of one feature (for which there is at least a philosophical explanation), it is concluded that the same clock that drives tidal rhythms could also motor daily rhythms, i.e., there may be no such thing as a 12.4-h horologue.     

Pigment‐dispersing factor affects circadian molecular oscillations in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus

Pigment‐dispersing factor (PDF) is an important neurotransmitter in insect circadian systems. In the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, it affects nocturnal activity, the free‐running period and photic entrainment. In this study, to investigate whether these effects of PDF occur through a circadian molecular machinery, we measured mRNA levels of clock genes period (per) and timeless (tim) in crickets with pdf expression knocked‐down by pdf RNAi. The pdf RNAi decreased per and tim mRNA levels during the night to reduce the amplitude of their oscillation. The phase of the rhythm advanced by about 4 h in terms of trough and/or peak phases. On the other hand, pdf mRNA levels were little affected by per and tim RNAi treatment. These results suggest that PDF affects the circadian rhythm at least in part through the circadian molecular oscillation while the circadian clock has little effect on the pdf expression.     

Circadian clock rhythms in different adipose tissue model systems

ABSTRACT

Circadian clock-controlled 24-h oscillations in adipose tissues play an important role in the regulation of energy homeostasis, thus representing a potential drug target for prevention and therapy of metabolic diseases. For pharmacological screens, scalable adipose model systems are needed that largely recapitulate clock properties observed in vivo. In this study, we compared molecular circadian clock regulation in different ex vivo and in vitro models derived from murine adipose tissues. Explant cultures from three different adipose depots of PER2::LUC circadian reporter mice revealed stable and comparable rhythms of luminescence ex vivo. Likewise, primary pre- and mature adipocytes from these mice displayed stable luminescence rhythms, but with strong damping in mature adipocytes. Stable circadian periods were also observed using Bmal1-luc and Per2-luc reporters after lentiviral transduction of wild-type pre-adipocytes. SV40 immortalized adipocytes of murine brown, subcutaneous and epididymal adipose tissue origin showed rhythmic mRNA expression of the core clock genes Bmal1, Per2, Dbp and REV-erbα in pre- and mature adipocytes, with a maturation-associated increase in overall mRNA levels and amplitudes. A comparison of clock gene mRNA rhythm phases revealed specific changes between in vivo and ex vivo conditions. In summary, our data indicate that adipose culture systems to a large extent mimic in vivo tissue clock regulation. Thus, both explant and cell systems may be useful tools for large-scale screens for adipose clock regulating factors.     

Rhythmic gene expression in somite formation and neural development

In mouse embryos, somite formation occurs every two hours, and this periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic expression of the basic helix-loop-helix gene Hes7. Hes7 expression oscillates by negative feedback and is cooperatively regulated by Fgf and Notch signaling. Both loss of expression and sustained expression of Hes7 result in severe somite fusion, suggesting that Hes7 oscillation is required for proper somite segmentation. Expression of a related gene, Hes1, also oscillates by negative feedback with a period of about two hours in many cell types such as neural progenitor cells. Hes1 is required for maintenance of neural progenitor cells, but persistent Hes1 expression inhibits proliferation and differentiation of these cells, suggesting that Hes1 oscillation is required for their proper activities. Hes1 oscillation regulates cyclic expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 (Ngn2) and the Notch ligand Delta1, which in turn lead to maintenance of neural progenitor cells by mutual activation of Notch signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that oscillatory expression with short periods (ultradian oscillation) plays an important role in many biological events.     

The Ultradian Clocks of Eukaryotic Microbes: Timekeeping Devices Displaying a Homeostasis of the Period

Temperature compensation of their period is one of the canonical characteristics of circadian rhythms, yet it is not restricted to circadian rhythms. This short review summarizes the evidence for ultradian rhythms, with periods from 1 minute to several hours, that likewise display a strict temperature compensation. They have been observed mostly in unicellular organisms in which their constancy of period at different temperatures, as well as under different growth conditions (e.g., medium type, carbon source), indicates a general homeostasis of the period. Up to eight different parameters, including cell division, cell motility, and energy metabolism, were observed to oscillate with the same periodicity and therefore appear to be under the control of the same central pacemaker. This suggests that these ultradian clocks should be considered as cellular timekeeping devices that in fast-growing cells take over temporal control of cellular functions controlled by the circadian clock in slow-growing or nongrowing cells. Being potential relatives of circadian clocks, these ultradian rhythms may serve as model systems in chronobiolog-ical research. Indeed, mutations have been found that affect both circadian and ultradian periods, indicating that the respective oscillators share some mechanistic features. In the haploid yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a number of genes have been identified where mutation, deletion, or overex-pression affect the ultradian clock. Since most of these genes play roles in cellular metabolism and signaling, and mutations have pleiotropic effects, it has to be assumed that the clock is deeply embedded in cellular physiology. It is therefore suggested that mechanisms ensuring temperature compensation and general homeostasis of period are to be sought in a wider context. (Chronobiology International, 14(5), 469–479, 1997)     

Silencing the circadian clock gene Clock using RNAi reveals dissociation of the circatidal clock from the circadian clock in the mangrove cricket

Whether a clock that generates a circatidal rhythm shares the same elements as the circadian clock is not fully understood. The mangrove cricket, Apteronemobius asahinai, shows simultaneously two endogenous rhythms in its locomotor activity; the circatidal rhythm generates active and inactive phases, and the circadian rhythm modifies activity levels by suppressing the activity during subjective day. In the present study, we silenced Clock (Clk), a master gene of the circadian clock, in A. asahinai using RNAi to investigate the link between the circatidal and circadian clocks. The abundance of Clk mRNA in the crickets injected with double-stranded RNA of Clk (dsClk) was reduced to a half of that in control crickets. dsClk injection also reduced mRNA abundance of another circadian clock gene period (per) and weakened diel oscillation in per mRNA expression. Examination of the locomotor rhythms under constant conditions revealed that the circadian modification was disrupted after silencing Clk expression, but the circatidal rhythm remained unaffected. There were no significant changes in the free-running period of the circatidal rhythm between the controls and the crickets injected with dsClk. Our results reveal that Clk is essential for the circadian clock, but is not required for the circatidal clock. From these results we propose that the circatidal rhythm of A. asahinai is driven by a clock, the molecular components of which are distinct from that of the circadian clock.     

Dating placentalia: Morphological clocks fail to close the molecular fossil gap

Dating the origin of Placentalia has been a contentious issue for biologists and paleontologists. Although it is likely that crown‐group placentals originated in the Late Cretaceous, nearly all molecular clock estimates point to a deeper Cretaceous origin. An approach with the potential to reconcile this discrepancy could be the application of a morphological clock. This would permit the direct incorporation of fossil data in node dating, and would break long internal branches of the tree, so leading to improved estimates of node ages. Here, we use a large morphological dataset and the tip‐calibration approach of MrBayes. We find that the estimated date for the origin of crown mammals is much older, ～130–145 million years ago (Ma), than fossil and molecular clock data (～80–90 Ma). Our results suggest that tip calibration may result in estimated dates that are more ancient than those obtained from other sources of data. This can be partially overcome by constraining the ages of internal nodes on the tree; however, when this was applied to our dataset, the estimated dates were still substantially more ancient than expected. We recommend that results obtained using tip calibration, and possibly morphological dating more generally, should be treated with caution.