Well-defined genome architecture in the human sperm nucleus

Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, conventional epifluorescence microscopy, and laser scanning confocal microscopy followed by three-dimensional reconstruction we describe a well-defined higher order packaging of the human genome in the sperm cell nucleus. This was determined by the spatial localization of centromere and telomere regions of all chromosomes and supported by localization of subtelomere sequences of chromosome 3 and the entire chromosome 2. The nuclear architecture in the human sperm is characterized by the clustering of the 23 centromeres into a compact chromocenter positioned well inside the nucleus. The ends of the chromosomes are exposed to the nuclear periphery where both the subtelomere and the telomere sequences of the chromosome arms are joined into dimers. Thus chromosomes in the human sperm nucleus are looped into a hairpin-like configuration. The biological implications of this nuclear architecture in spermatogenesis and male pronuclear formation following fertilization are discussed.     

Chromosomal constitution of nucleolus-associated chromatin in man

Summary Use of specific stains permits analysis of the frequency of nucleolus-associated heterochromatin in chromosomes 1 and 9 from human fibroblasts. In 81% of interphase nuclei the heterochromatic segment of both No. 1 chromosomes is associated with the nucleolus, while in 19% only one heterochromatic segment shows such an association with the other occupying a random position in the nucleoplasm. The nucleolar association of chromosome 9 heterochromatin is less constant: in 42.3% of the nuclei both segments are associated with the nucleolus, in 39% of the nuclei only one heterochromatic segment presents such an association, and in 18.7% neither of the two heterochromatic segments is in nucleolar association. In 6% of the cells, one or two chromosome 9 heterochromatic segments are in contact with the nuclear membrane.In situ hybridization using tritium-labeled 28S and 18S RNA shows that in the interphase nucleus the acrocentric short arms, carriers of ribosomal cistrons, are associated with the nucleolus.These observations demonstrate the complexity of the nucleolus-associated chromatin which, in addition to segments of chromosomes 1, 9, 13, 14, 15, 21 and 22, may include the Y chromosome. They also confirm that the nucleolus constitutes one of the orientation points determining the relative localization of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus.     

Interphase chromosome positioning affects the spectrum of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations

In interphase, chromosomes occupy defined nuclear volumes known as chromosome territories. To probe the biological consequences of the described nonrandom spatial positioning of chromosome territories in human lymphocytes, we performed an extensive FISH-based analysis of ionizing radiation-induced interchanges involving chromosomes 1, 4, 18 and 19. Since the probability of exchange formation depends strongly on the spatial distance between the damage sites in the genome, a preferential formation of exchanges between proximally positioned chromosomes is expected. Here we show that the spectrum of interchanges deviates significantly from one expected based on random chromosome positioning. Moreover, the observed exchange interactions between specific chromosome pairs as well as the interactions between homologous chromosomes are consistent with the proposed gene density-related radial distribution of chromosome territories. The differences between expected and observed exchange frequencies are more pronounced after exposure to densely ionizing neutrons than after exposure to sparsely ionizing X rays. These experiments demonstrate that the spatial positioning of interphase chromosomes affects the spectrum of chromosome rearrangements.     

Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications

In the nucleus of animal and plant cells individual chromosomes maintain a compartmentalized structure. Chromosome territories (CTs), as these structures were named by Theodor Boveri, are essential components of the higher-order chromatin architecture. Recent studies in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates indicate that the radial position of a given CT (or segments thereof) is correlated with its size, its gene-density and its replication timing. As a representative case, chicken cell nuclei show highly consistent radial chromatin arrangements: gene-rich, early replicating microchromosomes are clustered within the nuclear interior, while gene-poor, later replicating macrochromosomes are preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. In humans, chromosomes 18 and 19 (HSA18 and 19) territories that are of similar size show a distinctly different position in the cell nuclei of lymphocytes and lymphoblastoid cells: the gene-rich and early replicating HSA19 CTs are typically found close to the nuclear center, while the gene-poor and later replicating HSA18 CTs are preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. Recent comparative maps between human and chicken chromosomes revealed that the chicken macrochromosomes 2 and Z contain the genes homologous to HSA18, while the genes on HSA19 are located onto the chicken microchromosomes. These data lend tentative support to the hypothesis that differences in the radial nuclear positions of gene-rich, early replicating and gene-poor, later replicating chromatin have been evolutionarily conserved during a period of more than 300 million years irrespective of the evolution of highly divergent karyotypes between humans and chicken.     

The ordered arrangement of chromosomes in the Chinese hamster spermatocyte nucleus

Summary The question of chromosome distribution in the mammalian nucleus is addressed, and data are provided in support of the ordered arrangement of chromosomes in the Chinese hamster spermatocyte. Testicular cells were dispersed and air-dried without prior fixation, then stained and karyotyped. The position of chromosome telomeres in 217 pachytene spermatocytes was determined in relation to four concentric rings which equally divided the nuclear area. The distribution of telomeres showed a progressive decline from the central to the peripheral rings. This was particularly pronounced for chromosomes 1–7, but was reversed for the XY chromosomes. The distribution of the total as well as of the individual chromosomes was significantly different from that expected on the basis of random distribution. The only exceptions to this were chromosomes 8–10, which exhibited random distribution. Thus, while chromosomes 1–7 had a central position, the XY pair had a peripheral localization. The mean ring position appeared to be related to chromosome length, except for the XY chromosomes, suggesting that chromosome length may determine chromosome position.     

Nuclear and territorial topography of chromosome telomeres in human lymphocytes

Nuclear and territorial positioning of p- and q-telomeres and centromeres of chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 13, and 19 were studied by repeated fluorescence in situ hybridization, high-resolution cytometry, and three-dimensional image analysis in human blood lymphocytes before and after stimulation. Telomeres were found on the opposite side of the territories as compared with the centromeres for all chromosome territories investigated. Mutual distances between telomeres of submetacentric chromosomes were very short, usually shorter than centromere-to-telomere distances, which means that the chromosome territory is nonrandomly folded. Telomeres are, on average, much nearer to the center of the cell nucleus than centromeres; q-telomeres were found, on average, more centrally localized as compared with p-telomeres. Consequently, we directly showed that chromosome territories in the cell nucleus are (1) polar and (2) partially oriented in cell nuclei. The distributions of genetic elements relative to chromosome territories (territorial distributions) can be either narrower or broader than their nuclear distributions, which reflects the degree of adhesion of an element to the territory or to the nucleus. We found no tethering of heterologous telomeres of chromosomes 8, 9, and 19. In contrast, both pairs of homologous telomeres of chromosome 19 (but not in other chromosomes) are tethered (associated) very frequently.