Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Development of a Two-Color Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Technique for Species-Level Identification of Human-Infectious Cryptosporidium spp.

A two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization assay that allows for the simultaneous identification of Cryptosporidium parvum and C. hominis was developed. The assay is a simple, rapid, and cost-effective tool for the detection of the major Cryptosporidium species of concern to public health.Cryptosporidium (Apicomplexa) is a genus of protozoan parasites with species and genotypes that infect humans, domesticated livestock, companion animals, and wildlife worldwide (5, 6, 14, 15, 20, 23). The majority of cases of cryptosporidiosis in humans are caused by Cryptosporidium parvum or C. hominis (8, 10, 19, 24), although rare cases due to species such as C. meleagridis, C. felis, or C. canis have been reported (8, 9, 11-13, 17, 18, 22). The specific identification and characterization of Cryptosporidium species are central to the control of this disease in humans and a wide range of animals.One of the most widely adopted techniques for the identification of microorganisms in complex microbial communities is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes (2-4). This method relies on the hybridization of synthetic oligonucleotide probes to specific regions within the rRNA of the organism. While FISH has been applied for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples (21), no FISH probes that successfully differentiate C. hominis from C. parvum have been reported.We have reported previously on the design of a species-specific probe, Cpar677, that detects C. parvum (1). In this study, we report on the design and validation of a C. hominis species-specific probe, Chom253. Together, the two probes were used here for the development of a two-color, microscopy-based FISH assay for the simultaneous detection of C. parvum and C. hominis.     

Role of the DinB Homologs Rv1537 and Rv3056 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The environment encountered by Mycobacterium tuberculosis during infection is genotoxic. Most bacteria tolerate DNA damage by engaging specialized DNA polymerases that catalyze translesion synthesis (TLS) across sites of damage. M. tuberculosis possesses two putative members of the DinB class of Y-family DNA polymerases, DinB1 (Rv1537) and DinB2 (Rv3056); however, their role in damage tolerance, mutagenesis, and survival is unknown. Here, both dinB1 and dinB2 are shown to be expressed in vitro in a growth phase-dependent manner, with dinB2 levels 12- to 40-fold higher than those of dinB1. Yeast two-hybrid analyses revealed that DinB1, but not DinB2, interacts with the β-clamp, consistent with its canonical C-terminal β-binding motif. However, knockout of dinB1, dinB2, or both had no effect on the susceptibility of M. tuberculosis to compounds that form N²-dG adducts and alkylating agents. Similarly, deletion of these genes individually or in combination did not affect the rate of spontaneous mutation to rifampin resistance or the spectrum of resistance-conferring rpoB mutations and had no impact on growth or survival in human or mouse macrophages or in mice. Moreover, neither gene conferred a mutator phenotype when expressed ectopically in Mycobacterium smegmatis. The lack of the effect of altering the complements or expression levels of dinB1 and/or dinB2 under conditions predicted to be phenotypically revealing suggests that the DinB homologs from M. tuberculosis do not behave like their counterparts from other organisms.The emergence and global spread of multi- and extensively drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis have further complicated the already daunting challenge of controlling tuberculosis (TB) (15). The mechanisms that underlie the evolution of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis by chromosomal mutagenesis and their association with the conditions that tubercle bacilli encounter during the course of infection are poorly understood (6). It has been postulated that hypoxia, low pH, nutrient deprivation, and nitrosative and oxidative stress impose environmental and host immune-mediated DNA-damaging insults on infecting bacilli (64). In addition, the observed importance of excision repair pathways for the growth and survival of M. tuberculosis in murine models of infection (13, 55) and the upregulation of M. tuberculosis genes involved in DNA repair and modification in pulmonary TB in humans provide compelling evidence that the in vivo environment is DNA damaging (51).Damage tolerance constitutes an integral component of an organism''s response to genotoxic stress, preventing collapse of the replication fork at persisting, replication-blocking lesions through the engagement of specialized DNA polymerases that are able to catalyze translesion synthesis (TLS) across the sites of damage (19, 21, 60). Most TLS polymerases belong to the Y family, which comprises a wide range of structurally related proteins present in bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes (44). Of these, the DinB subfamily of Y family polymerases, whose founder member is Escherichia coli Pol IV (63), is conserved among all domains of life (44). The association of Y family polymerases with inducible mutagenesis has implicated these enzymes in the adaptation of bacteria to environmental stress (17, 20, 39, 54, 58, 59, 66). Their key properties are exemplified in E. coli Pol IV: the polymerase catalyzes efficient and accurate TLS across certain N²-dG adducts (27, 28, 34, 40, 45, 67) and has been implicated in the tolerance of alkylation damage (4); furthermore, overexpression of Pol IV significantly increases mutation rates in E. coli (reviewed in references 21 and 26), and dinB is the only SOS-regulated gene required at induced levels for stress-induced mutagenesis in this organism (20). Furthermore, overproduction of E. coli Pol IV inhibits replication fork progression through replacement of the replicative polymerase to form an alternate replisome in which Pol IV modulates the rate of unwinding of the DnaB helicase (25) and also reduces colony-forming ability (61).The M. tuberculosis genome encodes two Y family polymerase homologs belonging to the DinB subfamily, designated herein as DinB1 (DinX, encoded by Rv1537) and DinB2 (DinP, encoded by Rv3056), as well as a third, distantly related homolog encoded by Rv3394c (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (9). On the basis of sequence similarity with their counterparts from E. coli (63) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (54), including the complete conservation of key acidic residues essential for catalysis, DinB1 and DinB2 may be functional DNA polymerases (see Fig. S1). In contrast, Rv3394c lacks these residues and as such is unlikely to have polymerase activity (see Fig. S1). Unlike most Y family polymerase-encoding genes investigated with other bacteria (17, 26, 54, 58), dinB1 and dinB2 expression in M. tuberculosis is not dependent on RecA, the SOS response, or the presence of DNA damage (5, 7, 52). That these genes are regulated by other mechanisms and so may serve distinct roles in DNA metabolism in M. tuberculosis is suggested by the observation that dinB1 is differentially expressed in pulmonary TB (51) and is a member of the SigH regulon (30), whereas expression of dinB2 is induced following exposure to novobiocin (5).In this study, we adopted a genetic approach to investigate the function of dinB1 and dinB2 in M. tuberculosis. Mutants with altered complements or expression levels of dinB1 and/or dinB2 were analyzed in vitro and in vivo under conditions predicted to be phenotypically revealing based on DinB function established with other model organisms. The lack of discernible phenotypes in any of the assays employed suggests that the DinB homologs from M. tuberculosis do not behave like their counterparts from other organisms.     

Repeat-Associated Plasticity in the Helicobacter pylori RD Gene Family

The bacterium Helicobacter pylori is remarkable for its ability to persist in the human stomach for decades without provoking sterilizing immunity. Since repetitive DNA can facilitate adaptive genomic flexibility via increased recombination, insertion, and deletion, we searched the genomes of two H. pylori strains for nucleotide repeats. We discovered a family of genes with extensive repetitive DNA that we have termed the H. pylori RD gene family. Each gene of this family is composed of a conserved 3′ region, a variable mid-region encoding 7 and 11 amino acid repeats, and a 5′ region containing one of two possible alleles. Analysis of five complete genome sequences and PCR genotyping of 42 H. pylori strains revealed extensive variation between strains in the number, location, and arrangement of RD genes. Furthermore, examination of multiple strains isolated from a single subject''s stomach revealed intrahost variation in repeat number and composition. Despite prior evidence that the protein products of this gene family are expressed at the bacterial cell surface, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and immunoblot studies revealed no consistent seroreactivity to a recombinant RD protein by H. pylori-positive hosts. The pattern of repeats uncovered in the RD gene family appears to reflect slipped-strand mispairing or domain duplication, allowing for redundancy and subsequent diversity in genotype and phenotype. This novel family of hypervariable genes with conserved, repetitive, and allelic domains may represent an important locus for understanding H. pylori persistence in its natural host.Helicobacter pylori, a gram-negative bacterium, is remarkable for its ability to persist in the human stomach for decades. Colonization with H. pylori increases risk for peptic ulcer disease and gastric adenocarcinoma (53, 70) and elicits a vigorous immune response (15). The persistence of H. pylori occurs in a niche in the human body previously considered inhospitable to microbial colonization: the acidic stomach replete with proteolytic enzymes.H. pylori strains exhibit substantial genetic diversity, including extensive variation in the presence, arrangement, order, and identity of genes (2, 4-7, 25, 51, 74). Furthermore, analyses of multiple single-colony H. pylori isolates from separate stomach biopsy specimens of individual patients have demonstrated diversity, both within hosts (27, 65), and over time (36). The mechanisms that generate H. pylori genetic diversity may be among the factors that enable persistence in this environment (3, 28).While the natural ability of H. pylori for transformation and recombination may explain some of the intra- and interhost genetic variation observed in this bacterium (43), point mutations and interspecies recombination alone are not sufficient for explaining the extent of the variation in H. pylori (14, 32). The initial genomic sequencing of H. pylori strains 26695 and J99 (6, 72) revealed large amounts of repetitive DNA (1, 59). DNA repeats in bacteria are associated with mechanisms of plasticity, such as phase variation (49, 67); slipped-strand mispairing (41, 46); and increased rates of recombination, deletion, and insertion (17, 60, 62). Because many of the recombination repair and mismatch repair mechanisms common in bacteria are absent or modified in H. pylori (28-30, 56, 76), this organism may be particularly susceptible to the diversifying effects of repetitive DNA. In fact, loci in the H. pylori genome containing repetitive DNA have been shown to exhibit extensive inter- and intrahost variation (9, 10, 28, 37).We hypothesized that identification of repetitive DNA hotspots in H. pylori would allow the recognition of genes whose variation could aid in persistence. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted in silico analyses to identify open reading frames (ORFs) enriched for DNA repeats and then used a combination of sequence analyses and immunoassays to examine the patterns associated with the specific repetitive DNA observed. Our approach led to the realization that a previously identified H. pylori-specific gene family (19, 52) exhibits extensive genetic variation at multiple levels.     

Structural and Genetic Basis for the Serological Differentiation of Pasteurella multocida Heddleston Serotypes 2 and 5

Pasteurella multocida is classified into 16 serotypes according to the Heddleston typing scheme. As part of a comprehensive study to define the structural and genetic basis of this scheme, we have determined the structure of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) produced by P. multocida strains M1404 (B:2) and P1702 (E:5), the type strains for serotypes 2 and 5, respectively. The only difference between the LPS structures made by these two strains was the absence of a phosphoethanolamine (PEtn) moiety at the 3 position of the second heptose (Hep II) in M1404. Analysis of the lpt-3 gene, required for the addition of this PEtn residue, revealed that the gene was intact in P1702 but contained a nonsense mutation in M1404. Expression of an intact copy of lpt-3 in M1404 resulted in the attachment of a PEtn residue to the 3 position of the Hep II residue, generating an LPS structure identical to that produced by P1702. We identified and characterized each of the glycosyltransferase genes required for assembly of the serotype 2 and 5 LPS outer core. Monoclonal antibodies raised against serotype 2 LPS recognized the serotype 2/5-specific outer core LPS structure, but recognition of this structure was inhibited by the PEtn residue on Hep II. These data indicate that the serological classification of strains into Heddleston serotypes 2 and 5 is dependent on the presence or absence of PEtn on Hep II.Pasteurella multocida is a gram-negative pathogen that causes serious diseases in animals and humans. It is the causative agent of fowl cholera (7), hemorrhagic septicemia in cattle (9), atrophic rhinitis in pigs (6), and dog and cat bite infections in humans (28).P. multocida isolates may be grouped serologically based on capsular antigens into five serogroups—A, B, D, E, and F—using a passive hemagglutination test with erythrocytes sensitized with capsular antigen. Structural information is available for the capsular polysaccharides synthesized by serogroups A (hyaluronic acid) (22), D (heparin) (10), and F (chondroitin) (10). The genes involved in biosynthesis of the capsules have been identified for all five serogroups (27), and capsule is a critical virulence factor for serogroups A (8) and B (3).Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is also an important virulence factor in P. multocida (13) and can be used for the identification of strains, with two main somatic typing systems reported (14, 17). The Namioka system is based on a tube agglutination test and is able to recognize 11 serotypes (17), whereas the Heddleston system uses a gel diffusion precipitation test and can recognize 16 serotypes; the Heddleston system is currently the preferred method (14). Current classification of P. multocida strains combines capsular typing with Heddleston somatic typing. Strains are given a designation in which the first letter indicates the capsular group and the number designates the Heddleston LPS serotype (e.g., A:1 indicates a strain that is capsular group A and LPS serotype 1). LPS produced by each of the 16 Heddleston serotype strains has been examined previously for sugar content and reactivity with LPS antisera (21). The LPS isolated from serotype 2 and 5 strains was virtually identical in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis migration profile (19), sugar composition, and serological reactivity with anti-LPS antibodies (21). Interestingly, serotypes 2 and 5 were the only serotypes found to elaborate two isomers of heptose in their LPS, namely l-glycero-d-manno-heptose (ld-Hep) and d-glycero-d-manno-heptose (dd-Hep) (21). The aims of this study were to determine whether the LPS molecules made by these two serotypes were structurally distinct and to compare the LPS structures with those previously determined for P. multocida serotypes 1 and 3 (24-26). Furthermore, we identified the transferase genes responsible for the assembly of the outer core LPS structure in each of these strains and characterized the function of each glycosyltransferase.     

Aromatic Amino Acid Auxotrophs Constructed by Recombinant Marker Exchange in Methylophilus methylotrophus AS1 Cells Expressing the aroP-Encoded Transporter of Escherichia coli

The isolation of auxotrophic mutants, which is a prerequisite for a substantial genetic analysis and metabolic engineering of obligate methylotrophs, remains a rather complicated task. We describe a novel method of constructing mutants of the bacterium Methylophilus methylotrophus AS1 that are auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids. The procedure begins with the Mu-driven integration of the Escherichia coli gene aroP, which encodes the common aromatic amino acid transporter, into the genome of M. methylotrophus. The resulting recombinant strain, with improved permeability to certain amino acids and their analogues, was used for mutagenesis. Mutagenesis was carried out by recombinant substitution of the target genes in the chromosome by linear DNA using the FLP-excisable marker flanked with cloned homologous arms longer than 1,000 bp. M. methylotrophus AS1 genes trpE, tyrA, pheA, and aroG were cloned in E. coli, sequenced, disrupted in vitro using a Km^r marker, and electroporated into an aroP carrier recipient strain. This approach led to the construction of a set of marker-less M. methylotrophus AS1 mutants auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids. Thus, introduction of foreign amino acid transporter genes appeared promising for the following isolation of desired auxotrophs on the basis of different methylotrophic bacteria.The nonpathogenic Gram-negative bacterium Methylophilus methylotrophus is able to grow efficiently using C₁ substrates (methanol, methylamine, or trimethylamine) as the sole source of carbon and energy, and it uses the ribulose monophosphate pathway for fixation of formaldehyde produced by the oxidation of methanol (36). Methanol has received considerable attention by the fermentation industry as an alternative substrate to the more generally used sugars from agricultural crops. It can be synthesized either from petrochemicals or renewable resources, such as biogas (48), and therefore the production of methanol does not compete directly with human food supplies. Methylotrophs can therefore be considered potentially useful strains for industrial biotechnology. M. methylotrophus AS1 is an obligate methylotroph originally isolated from activated sludge, and it has been deposited in the National Collections of Industrial, Marine and Food Bacteria (NCIMB; no. 10515). This organism was extensively studied in the 1970s and has been industrialized on a large scale for the manufacturing of single-cell proteins (SCP) from methanol (56, 63). During that period, a significant amount of research was conducted on the direct production of amino acids by fermentation from methanol (3, 58). Although initially promising, these efforts ultimately proved relatively unsatisfactory and impractical, due primarily to the rather poor set of genetic tools that had been developed for methylotrophs.Over the last 5 years, several genomes of methylotrophs have been sequenced (8, 20, 29, 37, 65, 67), and significant progress in elucidating their metabolism has been achieved (14). The number of tools available for the genetic and metabolic engineering of methylotrophic bacteria has been expanded greatly (1, 15, 21, 43), and strategies to produce fine and bulk chemicals by methylotrophs have been described (5, 42, 57, 61). All of these factors led to renewed interest in the construction of methylotrophic strain producers, and the larger knowledge base has enabled more targeted engineering of these bacteria (55).Although M. methylotrophus AS1 has been extensively studied with regard to the industrial scale production of SCP (56, 63) and the oxidation of methanol at the initial stages of carbon and energy metabolism (13, 28), there has been little metabolic analysis of amino acid biosynthesis in this organism. Moreover, selection of auxotrophic mutants of obligate methylotrophs for broadening convenient genetic tools remains a particularly complicated task (19). Although the isolation of several auxotrophs for M. methylotrophus AS1 has been described (6, 23, 40), their numbers are limited. Development of different methods for the isolation of the mutants did not lead to construction of a collection of auxotrophic mutants that could assist in the investigation of amino acid biosynthetic pathways in M. methylotrophus AS1.As for the l-lysine (Lys) synthesis, systematic research was carried out by specialists at Ajinomoto Co., Inc., Japan, beginning with the investigation of the Lys biosynthetic pathway in M. methylotrophus AS1 (23, 61) and continuing with the construction and improvement of a Lys producer (22, 24, 33, 34). This was followed by optimization of fed-batch fermentation for overproduction of Lys from methanol (35).The aim of our investigation was to generate strains based on M. methylotrophus AS1 with the potential for industrial production of aromatic amino acids (AroAAs). It is known that mutants with relaxed feedback inhibition of key biosynthetic enzymes should be isolated at the initial steps of the construction of the amino acid producers and that the relevant degradation pathways should be blocked due to selection of the corresponding auxotrophic strains (7, 31, 49).In this study, a novel method for the construction of AroAA auxotrophic mutants of M. methylotrophus AS1 is described. This method is based on the introduction of a foreign gene encoding a specific amino acid transporter into the genome of M. methylotrophus AS1. The resulting recombinant methylotrophic strain, which possesses increased permeability to the AroAAs and their analogues, was mutated by recombination-mediated substitution of the target chromosomal genes of aromatic pathways by a flippase recombinase (FLP)-excisable marker from artificial linear DNA. This approach led to the construction of a set of M. methylotrophus AS1 marker-less mutants with destroyed genes of AroAA biosynthesis. Thus, introduction of foreign amino acid transporter genes appeared promising for the following isolation of desired auxotrophs on the basis of different methylotrophic bacteria.     

Bocavirus Infection Induces Mitochondrion-Mediated Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Arrest at G2/M Phase

Bocavirus is a newly classified genus of the family Parvovirinae. Infection with Bocavirus minute virus of canines (MVC) produces a strong cytopathic effect in permissive Walter Reed/3873D (WRD) canine cells. We have systematically characterized the MVC infection-produced cytopathic effect in WRD cells, namely, the cell death and cell cycle arrest, and carefully examined how MVC infection induces the cytopathic effect. We found that MVC infection induces an apoptotic cell death characterized by Bax translocalization to the mitochondrial outer membrane, disruption of the mitochondrial outer membrane potential, and caspase activation. Moreover, we observed that the activation of caspases occurred only when the MVC genome was replicating, suggesting that replication of the MVC genome induces apoptosis. MVC infection also induced a gradual cell cycle arrest from the S phase in early infection to the G₂/M phase at a later stage, which was confirmed by the upregulation of cyclin B1 and phosphorylation of cdc2. Cell cycle arrest at the G₂/M phase was reproduced by transfection of a nonreplicative NS1 knockout mutant of the MVC infectious clone, as well as by inoculation of UV-irradiated MVC. In contrast with other parvoviruses, only expression of the MVC proteins by transfection did not induce apoptosis or cell cycle arrest. Taken together, our results demonstrate that MVC infection induces a mitochondrion-mediated apoptosis that is dependent on the replication of the viral genome, and the MVC genome per se is able to arrest the cell cycle at the G₂/M phase. Our results may shed light on the molecular pathogenesis of Bocavirus infection in general.The Bocavirus genus is newly classified within the subfamily Parvovirinae of the family Parvoviridae (21). The currently known members of the Bocavirus genus include bovine parvovirus type 1 (BPV1) (17), minute virus of canines (MVC) (57), and the recently identified human bocaviruses (HBoV, HBoV2, and HBoV3) (4, 7, 36).MVC was first recovered from canine fecal samples in 1970 (10). The virus causes respiratory disease with breathing difficulty (14, 32, 49) and enteritis with severe diarrhea (11, 39), which often occurs with coinfection with other viruses (39), spontaneous abortion of fetuses, and death of newborn puppies (14, 29). Pathological lesions in fetuses in experimental infections were found in the lymphoid tissue of the lung and small intestine (14). MVC was isolated and grown in the Walter Reed/3873D (WRD) canine cell line (10), which is derived from a subdermoid cyst of an irradiated male dog (10). The full-length 5.4-kb genome of MVC was recently mapped with palindromic termini (60). Under the control of a single P6 promoter, through the mechanism of alternative splicing and alternative polyadenylation, MVC expresses two nonstructural proteins (NS1 and NP1) and two capsid proteins (VP1 and VP2). Like the NS1 proteins of other parvoviruses, the NS1 of MVC is indispensable for genome replication. The NP1 protein, which is unique to the Bocavirus genus, appears to be critical for optimal viral replication, as the NP1 knockout mutant of MVC suffers from severe impairment of replication (60). A severe cytopathic effect during MVC infection of WRD cells has been documented (10, 60).The HBoV genome has been frequently detected worldwide in respiratory specimens from children under 2 years old with acute respiratory illnesses (2, 34, 55). HBoV is associated with acute expiratory wheezing and pneumonia (3, 34, 55) and is commonly detected in association with other respiratory viruses (34, 55). Further studies are necessary, however, to identify potential associations of HBoV infection with clinical symptoms or disease of acute gastroenteritis (7, 36). The full-length sequence of infectious MVC DNA (GenBank accession no. {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"FJ214110","term_id":"219665308","term_text":"FJ214110"}}FJ214110) that we have reported shows 52.6% identity to HBoV, while the NS1, NP1, and VP1 proteins are 38.5%, 39.9%, and 43.7% identical to those of HBoV, respectively (60).The cytopathic effect induced during parvovirus infection has been widely documented, e.g., in infections with minute virus of mice (MVM) (13), human parvovirus B19 (B19V) (58), parvovirus H-1 (25, 52), and BPV1 (1). In Bocavirus, cell death during BPV1 infection of embryonic bovine tracheal cells has been shown to be achieved through necrosis, independent of apoptosis (1). B19V-induced cell death of primary erythroid progenitor cells has been shown to be mainly mediated by an apoptotic pathway (58) in which the nonstructural protein 11kDa plays a key role (16). In contrast, the MVM-induced cytopathic effect has been revealed to be mediated by NS1 interference with intracellular casein kinase II (CKII) signaling (22, 44, 45), a nonapoptotic cell death. Oncolytic parvovirus H-1 infections can induce either apoptosis or nonapoptotic cell death, depending on the cell type (25, 40). Therefore, the mechanisms underlying parvovirus infection-induced cell death vary, although NS1 has been widely shown to be involved in both apoptotic and nonapoptotic cell death. The nature of the cytopathic effect during Bocavirus MVC infection has not been studied.Parvovirus replication requires infected cells at the S phase. Infection with parvovirus has been revealed to accompany a cell cycle perturbation that mostly leads to an arrest in the S/G₂ phase or the G₂/M phase during infection (30, 33, 42, 47, 65). MVM NS1 expression induces an accumulation of sensitive cells in the S/G₂ phase (6, 46, 47). Whether MVC infection-induced cell death is accompanied by an alternation of cell cycle progression and whether the viral nonstructural protein is involved in these processes have not been addressed.In this study, we found, in contrast with other members of the family Parvoviridae, expression of both the nonstructural and structural proteins of MVC by transfection did not induce cell death or cell cycle arrest. However, the cytopathic effect induced during MVC infection is a replication-coupled, mitochondrion-mediated and caspase-dependent apoptosis, accompanied with a gradual cell cycle arrest from the S phase to the G₂/M phase, which is facilitated by the MVC genome.     

Cell-to-Cell Spread of the RNA Interference Response Suppresses Semliki Forest Virus (SFV) Infection of Mosquito Cell Cultures and Cannot Be Antagonized by SFV

In their vertebrate hosts, arboviruses such as Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (Togaviridae) generally counteract innate defenses and trigger cell death. In contrast, in mosquito cells, following an early phase of efficient virus production, a persistent infection with low levels of virus production is established. Whether arboviruses counteract RNA interference (RNAi), which provides an important antiviral defense system in mosquitoes, is an important question. Here we show that in Aedes albopictus-derived mosquito cells, SFV cannot prevent the establishment of an antiviral RNAi response or prevent the spread of protective antiviral double-stranded RNA/small interfering RNA (siRNA) from cell to cell, which can inhibit the replication of incoming virus. The expression of tombusvirus siRNA-binding protein p19 by SFV strongly enhanced virus spread between cultured cells rather than virus replication in initially infected cells. Our results indicate that the spread of the RNAi signal contributes to limiting virus dissemination.In animals, RNA interference (RNAi) was first described for Caenorhabditis elegans (27). The production or introduction of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in cells leads to the degradation of mRNAs containing homologous sequences by sequence-specific cleavage of mRNAs. Central to RNAi is the production of 21- to 26-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) from dsRNA and the assembly of an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), followed by the degradation of the target mRNA (23, 84). RNAi is a known antiviral strategy of plants (3, 53) and insects (21, 39, 51). Study of Drosophila melanogaster in particular has given important insights into RNAi responses against pathogenic viruses and viral RNAi inhibitors (31, 54, 83, 86, 91). RNAi is well characterized for Drosophila, and orthologs of antiviral RNAi genes have been found in Aedes and Culex spp. (13, 63).Arboviruses, or arthropod-borne viruses, are RNA viruses mainly of the families Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Togaviridae. The genus Alphavirus within the family Togaviridae contains several mosquito-borne pathogens: arboviruses such as Chikungunya virus (16) and equine encephalitis viruses (88). Replication of the prototype Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) is well understood (44, 71, 74, 79). Their genome consists of a positive-stranded RNA with a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly(A) tail. The 5′ two-thirds encodes the nonstructural polyprotein P1234, which is cleaved into four replicase proteins, nsP1 to nsP4 (47, 58, 60). The structural polyprotein is encoded in the 3′ one-third of the genome and cleaved into capsid and glycoproteins after translation from a subgenomic mRNA (79). Cytoplasmic replication complexes are associated with cellular membranes (71). Viruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (35).In nature, arboviruses are spread by arthropod vectors (predominantly mosquitoes, ticks, flies, and midges) to vertebrate hosts (87). Little is known about how arthropod cells react to arbovirus infection. In mosquito cell cultures, an acute phase with efficient virus production is generally followed by the establishment of a persistent infection with low levels of virus production (9). This is fundamentally different from the cytolytic events following arbovirus interactions with mammalian cells and pathogenic insect viruses with insect cells. Alphaviruses encode host response antagonists for mammalian cells (2, 7, 34, 38).RNAi has been described for mosquitoes (56) and, when induced before infection, antagonizes arboviruses and their replicons (1, 4, 14, 15, 29, 30, 32, 42, 64, 65). RNAi is also functional in various mosquito cell lines (1, 8, 43, 49, 52). In the absence of RNAi, alphavirus and flavivirus replication and/or dissemination is enhanced in both mosquitoes and Drosophila (14, 17, 31, 45, 72). RNAi inhibitors weakly enhance SFV replicon replication in tick and mosquito cells (5, 33), posing the questions of how, when, and where RNAi interferes with alphavirus infection in mosquito cells.Here we use an A. albopictus-derived mosquito cell line to study RNAi responses to SFV. Using reporter-based assays, we demonstrate that SFV cannot avoid or efficiently inhibit the establishment of an RNAi response. We also demonstrate that the RNAi signal can spread between mosquito cells. SFV cannot inhibit cell-to-cell spread of the RNAi signal, and spread of the virus-induced RNAi signal (dsRNA/siRNA) can inhibit the replication of incoming SFV in neighboring cells. Furthermore, we show that SFV expression of a siRNA-binding protein increases levels of virus replication mainly by enhancing virus spread between cells rather than replication in initially infected cells. Taken together, these findings suggest a novel mechanism, cell-to-cell spread of antiviral dsRNA/siRNA, by which RNAi limits SFV dissemination in mosquito cells.     

A Single Tyrosine in the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Membrane Protein Cytoplasmic Tail Is Important for Efficient Interaction with Spike Protein

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) encodes 3 major envelope proteins: spike (S), membrane (M), and envelope (E). Previous work identified a dibasic endoplasmic reticulum retrieval signal in the cytoplasmic tail of SARS-CoV S that promotes efficient interaction with SARS-CoV M. The dibasic signal was shown to be important for concentrating S near the virus assembly site rather than for direct interaction with M. Here, we investigated the sequence requirements of the SARS-CoV M protein that are necessary for interaction with SARS-CoV S. The SARS-CoV M tail was shown to be necessary for S localization in the Golgi region when the proteins were exogenously coexpressed in cells. This was specific, since SARS-CoV M did not retain an unrelated glycoprotein in the Golgi. Importantly, we found that an essential tyrosine residue in the SARS-CoV M cytoplasmic tail, Y₁₉₅, was important for S-M interaction. When Y₁₉₅ was mutated to alanine, M_Y195A no longer retained S intracellularly at the Golgi. Unlike wild-type M, M_Y195A did not reduce the amount of SARS-CoV S carbohydrate processing or surface levels when the two proteins were coexpressed. Mutating Y₁₉₅ also disrupted SARS-CoV S-M interaction in vitro. These results suggest that Y₁₉₅ is necessary for efficient SARS-CoV S-M interaction and, thus, has a significant involvement in assembly of infectious virus.Coronaviruses are enveloped positive-strand RNA viruses that infect a wide variety of mammalian and avian species. These viruses generally cause mild disease in humans and are one major cause of the common cold (34). However, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), a novel human coronavirus which emerged in the Guangdong province in China in 2002 (30, 48), caused a widespread pandemic. SARS-CoV caused severe disease with a mortality rate of approximately 10%, the highest for any human coronavirus to date (62). The phylogeny and group classification of SARS-CoV remain controversial (17), but it is widely accepted to be a distant member of group 2. While SARS-CoV is no longer a major health threat, understanding the basic biology of this human pathogen remains important.Coronaviruses encode three major envelope proteins in addition to various nonstructural and accessory proteins. The envelope protein (E) is the least abundant structural protein in the virion envelope, although it is expressed at robust levels during infection (21). E plays an essential role in assembly for some but not all coronaviruses (31-33, 45) and may also be a viroporin (reviewed in reference 21). The spike glycoprotein (S) is the second most abundant protein in the envelope. S determines host cell tropism, binds the host receptor, and is responsible for virus-cell, as well as cell-cell, fusion (15). The S protein is a type I membrane protein with a large, heavily glycosylated luminal domain and a short cytoplasmic tail that has been shown to be palmitoylated in some coronaviruses (47, 58). The membrane protein (M) is the most abundant protein in the virion envelope and acts as a scaffold for virus assembly. M has three transmembrane domains, a long cytoplasmic tail, and a short glycosylated luminal domain (reviewed in reference 21). Unlike many enveloped viruses, coronaviruses assemble at and bud into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC) and exit the infected cell by exocytosis (29). In order to accomplish this, the envelope proteins must be targeted to the budding compartment for assembly.For most coronaviruses, the E and M proteins localize in the Golgi region near the budding site independently of other viral structural proteins. We have previously shown for infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) E protein that the cytoplasmic tail contains Golgi targeting information (9). IBV M contains Golgi targeting information in its first transmembrane domain (57), while the transmembrane domains and cytoplasmic tail of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) M appear to play a role in Golgi targeting (1, 36). Some coronavirus S proteins contain targeting information in their cytoplasmic tails; however, some do not (38, 39, 52, 63). Since S proteins can escape to the cell surface when highly expressed, S may rely on lateral interactions with other viral envelope proteins to localize to the budding site and be incorporated into newly assembling virions.In line with its role in virus assembly, M is necessary for virus-like particle (VLP) formation (3, 10, 26, 40, 55, 59). M has been shown to interact with itself to form homo-oligomers (12). In addition, M interacts with E, S, and the viral nucleocapsid and is essential for virion assembly (reviewed in reference 21). Lateral interactions between the coronavirus envelope proteins are critical for efficient virus assembly. The interaction of S and M has been studied for MHV, and the cytoplasmic tail of each protein is important for interaction (16, 44). Specifically, deletion of an amphipathic region in the MHV M cytoplasmic tail abrogates efficient interaction with MHV S (11). The S and M proteins of IBV, bovine coronavirus, feline infectious peritonitis virus, and SARS-CoV have been shown to interact; however, information about the specific regions that are important for interaction remains elusive (16, 22, 26, 42, 64). Due to the presence of several accessory proteins in the virion envelope (23-25, 28, 51, 53), it is possible that the requirements for SARS-CoV S and M interaction could be different from those of previously studied coronaviruses.In earlier work, we reported that SARS-CoV M retains SARS-CoV S intracellularly at the Golgi region when both proteins are expressed exogenously (39). We also demonstrated that the SARS-CoV S cytoplasmic tail interacts with in vitro-transcribed and -translated SARS-CoV M (39). Here, we show that the SARS-CoV M cytoplasmic tail is necessary for specific retention of SARS-CoV S at the Golgi region. We found a critical tyrosine residue at position 195 to be important for retaining SARS-CoV S Golgi membranes when coexpressed with M. When Y₁₉₅ was mutated to alanine, the mutant protein, M_Y195A, did not reduce the amount of SARS-CoV S at the plasma membrane or reduce the extent of S carbohydrate processing as well as wild-type SARS-CoV M does. Additionally, mutation of Y₁₉₅ in SARS-CoV M disrupted the S-M interaction in vitro. Thus, Y₁₉₅ is likely to play a critical role in the assembly of infectious SARS-CoV.     

Mycobacterial Biofilms Facilitate Horizontal DNA Transfer between Strains of Mycobacterium smegmatis

Conjugal transfer of chromosomal DNA between strains of Mycobacterium smegmatis occurs by a novel mechanism. In a transposon mutagenesis screen, three transfer-defective insertions were mapped to the lsr2 gene of the donor strain mc²155. Because lsr2 encodes a nonspecific DNA-binding protein, mutations of lsr2 give rise to a variety of phenotypes, including an inability to form biofilms. In this study, we show that efficient DNA transfer between strains of M. smegmatis occurs in a mixed biofilm and that the process requires expression of lsr2 in the donor but not in the recipient strain. Testing cells from different strata of standing cultures showed that transfer occurred predominantly at the biofilm air-liquid interface, as other strata containing higher cell densities produced very few transconjugants. These data suggest that the biofilm plays a role beyond mere facilitation of cell-cell contact. Surprisingly, we found that under standard assay conditions the recipient strain does not form a biofilm. Taking these results together, we conclude that for transfer to occur, the recipient strain is actively recruited into the biofilm. In support of this idea, we show that donor and recipient cells are present in almost equal numbers in biofilms that produce transconjugants. Our demonstration of genetic exchange between mycobacteria in a mixed biofilm suggests that conjugation occurs in the environment. Since biofilms are considered to be the predominant natural microhabitat for bacteria, our finding emphasizes the importance of studying biological and physical processes that occur between cells in mixed biofilms.Biofilms are dynamic communities of microorganisms that form on surfaces or at air-liquid interfaces (17, 20, 41). They arise following the attachment of bacteria to a surface; the bacteria then grow, differentiate, and multiply. The colonizing bacteria produce extracellular polymers, which encapsulate the cells and trap particulate matter, nutrients, and other bacteria that in turn contribute to the further development of the biofilm. Thus, as the biofilm develops it becomes increasingly heterogeneous. Microbial life is thought to exist predominantly in a biofilm, and biofilms can have either beneficial or harmful impacts on their environments (23). From a medical standpoint, biofilms can create serious problems. Bacteria within a biofilm are inherently more resistant to antibiotics, which makes their eradication difficult and is particularly problematic for patients with surgical implants resulting in chronic infections (19, 33).Mycobacteria are known to form biofilms; however, relatively little is known about the mechanism of biofilm formation and development or its role in the biology of Mycobacterium species. For practical reasons, most biofilm studies have focused on the more rapidly growing and less pathogenic species, namely, Mycobacterium fortuitum, M. marinum, and M. smegmatis (16, 18, 36). In particular, genetic studies of M. smegmatis have provided insight into some of the key factors required for biofilm formation (5, 30, 31, 36, 37). Glycopeptidolipids are required for initial surface attachment of M. smegmatis, while GroEL1 is required for a later stage of biofilm development. GroEL1 is thought to coordinate a switch in mycolic acid synthesis from very-long-chain (C₇₀ to C₉₀) to shorter-chain (C₅₆ to C₆₈) derivatives. The short-chain mycolic acids were proposed previously to form the extracellular matrix critical for biofilm formation (30). The metabolic switch in mycolic acid synthesis was also correlated with iron availability. Under iron-limiting conditions or in exochelin mutants, biofilm formation is arrested, an event coincident with the synthesis of short-chain mycolic acids (31).A cytoplasmic protein, Lsr2, has also been shown to be critical in biofilm formation (5, 8). Lsr2 was first described as an immunodominant antigen of M. leprae (24); however, it has since been shown to modulate a diverse range of processes. The resultant phenotypes of lsr2 mutants can be attributed to the ability of Lsr2 to bind DNA nonspecifically (6, 7, 15). Lsr2 belongs to the family of histone-like DNA binding proteins, a fact that was demonstrated by showing that lsr2 can suppress hns mutant phenotypes in Escherichia coli and that hns can suppress lsr2 mutant phenotypes in M. smegmatis (14). lsr2 mutants have an altered colony morphology and are defective in biofilm formation (2, 5, 8). This phenotype is presumably a consequence of the altered expression of key surface proteins and apolar lipids, such as mycolyl-diacylglycerols, which are lacking in lsr2 mutants (5). In this study, we show that mycobacterial conjugal DNA transfer requires Lsr2 and that genetic exchange occurs in a mixed biofilm.We have previously described a novel conjugation system in M. smegmatis (34). Chromosomal transfer occurs in a unidirectional fashion from a donor to a recipient, and this process requires prolonged cell-cell contact (47). Our transfer studies to date have established that the genetic requirements differ markedly between the donor and recipient strains. Because bioinformatic searches of the completed M. smegmatis donor genome have failed to identify obvious transfer-related genes, transposon mutagenesis screens were used to empirically identify donor and recipient genes involved in DNA transfer. A transposon mutagenesis screen of the recipient strain identified loci throughout the genome that were necessary for efficient transfer (9). In contrast, mutagenesis screens of the donor strain failed to identify transfer-defective mutants; instead, hyperconjugative donor mutants were found (12). The hyperconjugative mutations mapped to the esx-1 locus, which encodes a highly conserved secretory apparatus (ESX-1) that is required for full virulence of M. tuberculosis (1, 10), as well as for DNA transfer in the recipient M. smegmatis (9). The hyperconjugative phenotype of esx-1 donor mutants indicated that protein secretion negatively regulates conjugal transfer from the donor.We have exploited the hyperconjugative phenotype of esx-1 mutants so as to increase the sensitivity of a genetic screen for transfer-defective mutants (29). This strategy resulted in the identification of lsr2 as being important for DNA transfer in the donor and led us to investigate the dependence of conjugation on biofilm formation. We show here that stationary liquid cultures develop a surface biofilm in which DNA transfer rates approach those found in our established solid-medium mating assays. Our data further suggest that the biofilm contributes in more ways than merely providing a concentrated cell environment, given that dense cell aggregates resting on the bottoms of these same stationary cultures are transfer deficient. The prevalence of heterogeneous, mixed biofilms in natural environments suggests that mycobacterial conjugal DNA transfer may occur outside the laboratory.     

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad6 Postreplication Repair and Siz1/Srs2 Homologous Recombination-Inhibiting Pathways Process DNA Damage That Arises in asf1 Mutants

The Asf1 and Rad6 pathways have been implicated in a number of common processes such as suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs), DNA repair, modification of chromatin, and proper checkpoint functions. We examined the relationship between Asf1 and different gene products implicated in postreplication repair (PRR) pathways in the suppression of GCRs, checkpoint function, sensitivity to hydroxyurea (HU) and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), and ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). We found that defects in Rad6 PRR pathway and Siz1/Srs2 homologous recombination suppression (HRS) pathway genes suppressed the increased GCR rates seen in asf1 mutants, which was independent of translesion bypass polymerases but showed an increased dependency on Dun1. Combining an asf1 deletion with different PRR mutations resulted in a synergistic increase in sensitivity to chronic HU and MMS treatment; however, these double mutants were not checkpoint defective, since they were capable of recovering from acute treatment with HU. Interestingly, we found that Asf1 and Rad6 cooperate in ubiquitination of PCNA, indicating that Rad6 and Asf1 function in parallel pathways that ubiquitinate PCNA. Our results show that ASF1 probably contributes to the maintenance of genome stability through multiple mechanisms, some of which involve the PRR and HRS pathways.DNA replication must be highly coordinated with chromatin assembly and cell division for correct propagation of genetic information and cell survival. Errors arising during DNA replication are corrected through the functions of numerous pathways including checkpoints and a diversity of DNA repair mechanisms (32, 33, 35). However, in the absence of these critical cellular responses, replication errors can lead to the accumulation of mutations and gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) as well as chromosome loss, a condition generally termed genomic instability (33). Genome instability is a hallmark of many cancers as well as other human diseases (24). There are many mechanisms by which GCRs can arise, and over the last few years numerous genes and pathways have been implicated in playing a role in the suppression of GCRs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in some cases in the etiology of cancer (27, 28, 33, 39-47, 51, 53, 56, 58, 60), including S. cerevisiae ASF1, which encodes the main subunit of the replication coupling assembly factor (37, 62).Asf1 is involved in the deposition of histones H3 and H4 onto newly synthesized DNA during DNA replication and repair (62), and correspondingly, asf1 mutants are sensitive to chronic treatment with DNA-damaging agents (2, 30, 62). However, asf1 mutants do not appear to be repair defective and can recover from acute treatment with at least some DNA-damaging agents (2, 8, 30, 31, 54), properties similar to those described for rad9 mutants (68). In the absence of Asf1, both the DNA damage and replication checkpoints become activated during normal cell growth, and in the absence of checkpoint execution, there is a further increase in checkpoint activation in asf1 mutants (30, 46, 54). It has been suggested that asf1 mutants are defective for checkpoint shutoff and that this might account for the increased steady-state levels of checkpoint activation seen in asf1 mutants (8); however, another study has shown that asf1 mutants are not defective for checkpoint shutoff and that in fact Asf1 and the chromatin assembly factor I (CAF-I) complex act redundantly or cooperate in checkpoint shutoff (31). Furthermore, Asf1 might be involved in proper activation of the Rad53 checkpoint protein, as Asf1 physically interacts with Rad53 and this interaction is abrogated in response to exogenous DNA damage (15, 26); however, the physiological relevance of this interaction is unclear. Asf1 is also required for K56 acetylation of histone H3 by Rtt109, and both rtt109 mutants and histone H3 variants that cannot be acetylated (38) share many of the properties of asf1 mutants, suggesting that at least some of the requirement for Asf1 in response to DNA damage is mediated through Rtt109 (11, 14, 22, 61). Subsequent studies of checkpoint activation in asf1 mutants have led to the hypothesis that replication coupling assembly factor defects result in destabilization of replication forks which are then recognized by the replication checkpoint and stabilized, suggesting that the destabilized replication forks account for both the increased GCRs and increased checkpoint activation seen in asf1 mutants (30). This hypothesis is supported by other recent studies implicating Asf1 in the processing of stalled replication forks (16, 57). This role appears to be independent of CAF-I, which can cooperate with Asf1 in chromatin assembly (63). Asf1 has also been shown to function in disassembly of chromatin, suggesting other possibilities for the mechanism of action of Asf1 at the replication fork (1, 2, 34). Thus, while Asf1 is thought to be involved in progression of the replication fork, both the mechanism of action and the factors that cooperate with Asf1 in this process remain obscure.Stalled replication forks, particularly those that stall at sites of DNA damage, can be processed by homologous recombination (HR) (6) or by a mechanism known as postreplication repair (PRR) (reviewed in reference 67). There are two PRR pathways, an error-prone pathway involving translesion synthesis (TLS) by lower-fidelity polymerases and an error-free pathway thought to involve template switching (TS) (67). In S. cerevisiae, the PRR pathways are under the control of the RAD6 epistasis group (64). The error-prone pathway depends on monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) on K164 by Rad6 (an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme) by Rad18 (E3 ubiquitin ligase) (23). This results in replacement of the replicative DNA polymerase with nonessential TLS DNA polymerases, such as REV3/REV7-encoded DNA polymerase ζ (polζ) and RAD30-encoded DNA polη, which can bypass different types of replication-blocking damage (67). The error-free pathway is controlled by Rad5 (E3) and a complex consisting of Ubc13 and Mms2 (E2 and E2 variant, respectively), which add a K63-linked polyubiquitin chain to monoubiquitinated PCNA, leading to TS to the undamaged nascent sister chromatid (4, 25, 65). Furthermore, in addition to modification with ubiquitin, K164 of PCNA can also be sumoylated by Siz1, resulting in subsequent recruitment of the Srs2 helicase and inhibition of deleterious Rad51-dependent recombination events (50, 52, 55), although it is currently unclear if these are competing PCNA modifications or if both can exist on different subunits in the same PCNA trimer. A separate branch of the Rad6 pathway involving the E3 ligase Bre1 monoubiquitinates the histone H2B (29, 69) as well as Swd2 (66), which stimulates Set1-dependent methylation of K4 and Dot1-dependent methylation of K79 of histone H3 (48, 49, 66). Subsequently, K79-methylated H3 recruits Rad9 and activates the Rad53 checkpoint (19, 70). Activation of Rad53 is also bolstered by Rad6-Rad18-dependent ubiquitination of Rad17, which is part of the 9-1-1 complex that functions upstream in the checkpoint pathway (17). Finally, Rad6 complexes with the E3 Ubr1, which mediates protein degradation by the N-end rule pathway (13).Due to the role of the PRR pathways at stalled replication forks and a recent study implicating the Rad6 pathway in the suppression of GCRs (39), we examined the relationship between these ubiquitination and sumoylation pathways and the Asf1 pathway in order to gain additional insights into the function of Asf1 during DNA replication and repair. Our findings suggest that Asf1 has multiple functions that prevent replication damage or act in the cellular responses to replication damage and that these functions are modified by and interact with the PRR pathways. The TLS PRR pathway does not appear to be involved, and both a Dun1-dependent replication checkpoint and HR are important for preventing the deleterious effects of PRR and Asf1 pathway defects. We hypothesize that this newly observed cooperation between Asf1 and the PRR pathways may be required for resolving stalled replication forks, leading to suppression of GCRs and successful DNA replication.