Microspectrophotometric studies of Romanowsky stained blood cells. III. The action of methylene blue and azure B

The performances of two standardized Romanowsky stains (azure B/eosin and azure B/methylene blue/eosin) have been compared with each other and with a methylene blue/eosin stain. Visible-light absorbance spectra of various hematological substrates have been measured. These have been analyzed in terms of the quantities of bound azure B, methylene blue and eosin dimers and monomers, and in terms of the CIE color coordinates. It has been found that the addition of methylene blue to azure B/eosin produces little change in performance, at least using these two analytical methods. Methylene blue/eosin does not produce the purplish colorations typical of the Romanowsky effect. This is due not to differences between the spectra of methylene blue and azure B, but to the fact that methylene blue does not facilitate the binding of eosin to cellular substrates to the same extent as azure B.     

Romanowsky dyes and the Romanowsky-Giemsa effect. 3. Microspectrophotometric studies of Romanowsky-Giemsa staining. Spectroscopic evidence of a DNA-azure B-eosin Y complex producing the Romanowsky-Giemsa effect

The Romanowsky-Giemsa staining (RG staining) has been studied by means of microspectrophotometry using various staining conditions. As cell material we employed in our model experiments mouse fibroblasts, LM cells. They show a distinct Romanowsky-Giemsa staining pattern. The RG staining was performed with the chemical pure dye stuffs azure B and eosin Y. In addition we stained the cells separately with azure B or eosin Y. Staining parameters were pH value, dye concentration, staining time etc. Besides normal LM cells we also studied cells after RNA or DNA digestion. The spectra of the various cell species were measured with a self constructed microspectrophotometer by photon counting technique. The optical ray pass and the diagramm of electronics are briefly discussed. The nucleus of RG stained LM cells, pH congruent to 7, is purple, the cytoplasm blue. After DNA or RNA digestion the purple respectively blue coloration in the nucleus or the cytoplasm completely disappeares. Therefore DNA and RNA are the preferentially stained biological substrates. In the spectrum of RG stained nuclei, pH congruent to 7, three absorption bands are distinguishable: They are A1 (15400 cm-1, 649 nm), A2 (16800 cm-1, 595 nm) the absorption bands of DNA-bound monomers and dimers of azure B and RB (18100 cm-1, 552 nm) the distinct intense Romanowsky band. Our extensive experimental material shows clearly that RB is produced by a complex of DNA, higher polymers of azure B (degree of association p greater than 2) and eosin Y. The complex is primarily held together by electrostatic interaction: inding of polymer azure B cations to the polyanion DNA generates positively charged binding sites in the DNA-azure B complex which are subsequently occupied by eosin Y anions. It can be spectroscopically shown that the electronic states of the azure B polymers and the attached eosin Y interact. By this interaction the absorption of eosin Y is red shifted and of the azure B polymers blue shifted. The absorption bands of both molecular species overlap and generate the Romanowsky band. Its strong maximum at 18100 cm-1 is due to the eosin Y part of the DNA-azure B-eosin Y complex. The discussed red shift of the eosin Y absorption is the main reason for the purple coloration of RG stained nuclei. Using a special technique it was possible to prepare an artificial DNA-azure B-eosin Y complex with calf thymus DNA as a model nucleic acid and the two dye stuffs azure B and eosin Y.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Standardization of the Romanowsky staining procedure: an overview

Commerically available Romanowsky blood stains are variable mixtures of thiazein dyes and brominated fluorescein derivatives with varying degrees of metallic salt contamination in a number of different solvent systems. There is a need for standardized Romanowsky stains of constant composition, which, when used in conjunction with a carefully controlled specimen preparation technique, should give consistent performance. Such a preparation system would be of great value to hematologists in general and would be essential to the validity of data obtained by the digital processing of blood cell images. It is possible to prepare standardized Romanowsky stains as mixtures of two or three dye components, namely, eosin Y, azure B and methylene blue, although azure B has only recently become commercially available at an acceptable degree of purity. The logistic problems of stain standardization are discussed.     

Understanding Romanowsky staining. I: The Romanowsky-Giemsa effect in blood smears

Normal blood smears were stained by the standardised azure B-eosin Y Romanowsky procedure recently introduced by the ICSH, and the classical picture resulted. The effects of varying the times and temperature of staining, the composition of the solvent (buffer concentration, methanol content, & pH), the concentration of the dyes, and the mode of fixation were studied. The results are best understood in terms of the following staining mechanism. Initial colouration involves simple acid and basic dyeing. Eosin yields red erythrocytes and eosinophil granules. Azure B very rapidly gives rise to blue stained chromatin, neutrophil specific granules, platelets and ribosome-rich cytoplasms; also to violet basophil granules. Subsequently the azure B in certain structures combines with eosin to give purple azure B-eosin complexes, leaving other structures with their initial colours. The selectivity of complex formation is controlled by rate of entry of eosin into azure B stained structures. Only faster staining structures (i.e. chromatin, neutrophil specific granules, and platelets) permit formation of the purple complex in the standard method. This staining mechanism illuminates scientific problems (e.g. the nature of 'toxic' granules) and assists technical trouble-shooting (e.g. why nuclei sometimes stain blue, not purple).     

Romanowsky staining,the Romanowsky effect and thoughts on the question of scientific priority

I give an historical account and analysis of the scientific priority of the discovery of the polychrome staining of microscopic biological preparations provided by mixtures of eosin plus methylene blue and its derivatives, especially azure B. I maintain that both the formal priority for the discovery of the polychrome staining phenomenon and credit for initiating the development of a technique of polychrome staining properly belong to D. L. Romanowsky. His scientific work demonstrated the possibility of using a simple technique to stain hematological preparations selectively to give good contrast, high resolution and the ability to identify malaria parasites. Romanowsky’s approach constituted the starting point for the development of a family of polychrome stains for microscopic investigation of hematological preparations by a number of his contemporaries.     

Giemsa Stain for the Diagnosis of Bovine Babesiosis. I. Staining Properties of Commercial Samples and Their Component Dyes

SYNOPSIS. Studies on the composition of commercial Giemsa stain and its effect upon staining quality are reported. These studies were supplemented by observations on the preparation of the components of Giemsa stain and their staining properties in aqueous solution, in Nocht's solution, and in laboratory prepared Giemsa stains containing one azure component. Five groups of commercial batches were differentiated on the basis of their staining reactions on thick and thin films of bovine blood containing Babesia bigemina and B. argentina. Spectrophotometric and chromatographic analysis showed that four groups differed in the proportions of the thiazine components present, while the fifth-group did not appear to be Giemsa stain. Comparison of their staining effects with those obtained with each component in laboratory prepared stains indicated that the major effects of commercial batches on both blood cells and parasites were due to the thiazine component or components in highest proportions, with satisfactory staining of protozoa associated with those batches containing high proportions of methylene blue and azure B and low proportions of the remaining thiazine components.
The function of each component of Giemsa stain is defined and the need for the proper balancing of thiazine eosinates with free azure is shown. Close correlation was obtained between analysis by spectrophotometry and chromatography and direct staining tests when samples initially with low MX values were re-examined spectrophotometrically after removal of their methylene violet content. The existence of a leuco form of eosin is reported and its possible significance to the Romanowsky effect is discussed.     

The Oxidation Products of Methylene Blue

The mechanism of the oxidation of methylene blue varies with the conditions. The formation of trimethyl thionin (azure B) and of asymmetrical dimethyl thionolin (azure A) is followed under alkaline conditions by that of dimethyl thionin (methylene violet) and under acid conditions by that of monomethyl thionin (named by authors azure C).

Simple and practical methods are given for the preparation of azure A and azure C. The latter product, which has not been obtained from methylene blue hitherto, has valuable staining properties as a nuclear and bacterial stain in tissue and may also be employed satisfactorily as a substitute for azure A in the MacNeal tetrachrome formula as a blood stain or substitute for the Giemsa stain.

Azure B has no particular merit in staining.

Azure C proves to be a very valuable stain. A procedure is given for its use with eosin Y and orange II as counterstains, by which it is possible to demonstrate bacteria in tissue and at the same time the cytological elements of the tissue.     

Understanding Romanowsky staining

Summary Normal blood smears were stained by the standardised azure B-eosin Y Romanowsky procedure recently introduced by the ICSH, and the classical picture resulted. The effects of varying the times and temperature of staining, the composition of the solvent (buffer concentration, methanol content, & pH), the concentration of the dyes, and the mode of fixation were studied. The results are best understood in terms of the following staining mechanism. Initial colouration involves simple acid and basic dyeing. Eosin yields red erythrocytes and eosinophil granules. Azure B very rapidly gives rise to blue stained chromatin, neutrophil specific granules, platelets and ribosome-rich cytoplasms; also to violet basophil granules. Subsequently the azure B in certain structures combines with eosin to give purple azure B-eosin complexes, leaving other structures with their initial colours. The selectivity of complex formation is controlled by rate of entry of eosin into azure B stained structures. Only faster staining structures (i.e. chromatin, neutrophil specific granules, and platelets) permit formation of the purple complex in the standard method. This staining mechanism illuminates scientific problems (e.g. the nature of toxic granules) and assists technical trouble-shooting (e.g. why nuclei sometimes stain blue, not purple).To whom offprint should be sent     

Lower Azure B Methylene Blue Ratios in Giemsa Type Blood and Malaria Stains

Starting from ancient reports that rare samples of methylene blue were apparently sufficiently contaminated with azures to give red plasmodial and red purple nuclear chromatin in Chenzinsky type methylene blue eosin stains, it was decided to determine how little azure B would suffice for such staining in methylene blue eosin stains. The traditional 1902 Giemsa had an azure:methylene blue: eosin ratio of about 6:3:6.3:10; Lillie's 1943 formula had a 5:7:10 ratio. In the current series of tests 5:7:10 (I), 4:8:10 (II), 3:9:10 (III), 2:10:10 (IV), 1:11:10 (V), and 0:12:10 (VI) were used. Malaria and blood stains were better than the standard 5:7:10 (I) in III, IV and II in that order. Normal and leukemic human blood, mouse blood with Plasmodium berghei, and monkey blood with the CDC strain of Pl. falciparum were used as test materials. The staining mixtures were made from highly purified samples of azure B and methylene blue. Staining mixtures contained 12 ml 0.1% thiazin dye, 10 ml 0.1% eosin, 2 ml each of glycerol, methanol and 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 6.5, 3 ml acetone as accelerator, and distilled water to make 40 ml; staining times of 10-30 min were used.     

Lower azure B methylene blue ratios in Giemsa type blood and malaria stains

Starting from ancient reports that rare samples of methylene blue were apparently sufficiently contaminated with azures to give red plasmodial and red purple nuclear chromatin in Chenzinsky type methylene blue eosin stains, it was decided to determine how little azure B would suffice for such staining in methylene blue eosin stains. The traditional 1902 Giemsa had an azure : methylene blue : eosin ratio of about 6 : 3 : 6.3 : 10; Lillie's 1943 formula had a 5 : 7 : 10 ratio. In the current series of tests 5 : 7 : 10 (I), 4 : 8 : 10 (II), 3 : 9 : 10 (III), 2 : 10 : 10 (IV), 1 : 11 : 10 (V), and 0 : 12 : 10 (VI) were used. Malaria and blood stains were better than the standard 5 : 7 : 10 (I) in III, IV and II in that order. Normal and leukemic human blood, mouse blood with Plasmodium berghei, and monkey blood with the CDC strain of Pl. falciparum were used as test materials. The staining mixtures were made from highly purified samples of azure B and methylene blue. Staining mixtures contained 12 ml 0.1% thiazin dye, 10 ml 0.1% eosin, 2 ml each of glycerol, methanol and 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 6.5, 3 ml acetone as accelerator, and distilled water to make 40 ml; staining times of 10--30 min were used.     

The Azure Dyes their Purification and Physicochemical properties. II. Purification of Azure B

A method is described for the purification of the dye azure B in quantities sufficient for biological staining experiments on a larger scale. The method is based on the use of column chromatography. Two columns are employed. In column A with silica gel as adsorbent the azure B fraction is isolated from a suitable substrate ('technical' azure B gained by a modification of Bernthsen's synthesis of methylene blue, or plychrome methylene blue) using an acetate-formate mixture as eluent. In column B, on an Amberlite polyineric adsorbent (XAD-2) the acetate-formate anions are exchanged for chloride. Regeneration of both columns is possible: KMnO₄, Na₂S₂O₄ and water are run through column A, 5% NaOH, methanol and water through column B. Purification of azure B on economic terms is thus attained. The opinion is expressed that this method is also applicable to the purification of other cationic dyes.     

ON THE NATURE OF THE DYE PENETRATING THE VACUOLE OF VALONIA FROM SOLUTIONS OF METHYLENE BLUE

When uninjured cells of Valonia are placed in methylene blue dissolved in sea water it is found, after 1 to 3 hours, that at pH 5.5 practically no dye penetrates, while at pH 9.5 more enters the vacuole. As the cells become injured more dye enters at pH 5.5, as well as at pH 9.5. No dye in reduced form is found in the sap of uninjured cells exposed from 1 to 3 hours to methylene blue in sea water at both pH values. When uninjured cells are placed in azure B solution, the rate of penetration of dye into the vacuole is found to increase with the rise in the pH value of the external dye solution. The partition coefficient of the dye between chloroform and sea water is higher at pH 9.5 than at pH 5.5 with both methylene blue and azure B. The color of the dye in chloroform absorbed from methylene blue or from azure B in sea water at pH 5.5 is blue, while it is reddish purple when absorbed from methylene blue and azure B at pH 9.5. Dry salt of methylene blue and azure B dissolved in chloroform appears blue. It is shown that chiefly azure B in form of free base is absorbed by chloroform from methylene blue or azure B dissolved in sea water at pH 9.5, but possibly a mixture of methylene blue and azure B in form of salt is absorbed from methylene blue at pH 5.5, and azure B in form of salt is absorbed from azure B in sea water at pH 5.5. Spectrophotometric analysis of the dye shows the following facts. 1. The dye which is absorbed by the cell wall from methylene blue solution is found to be chiefly methylene blue. 2. The dye which has penetrated from methylene blue solution into the vacuole of uninjured cells is found to be azure B or trimethyl thionine, a small amount of which may be present in a solution of methylene blue especially at a high pH value. 3. The dye which has penetrated from methylene blue solution into the vacuole of injured cells is either methylene blue or a mixture of methylene blue and azure B. 4. The dye which is absorbed by chloroform from methylene blue dissolved in sea water is also found to be azure B, when the pH value of the sea water is at 9.5, but it consists of azure B and to a less extent of methylene blue when the pH value is at 5.5. 5. Methylene blue employed for these experiments, when dissolved in sea water, in sap of Valonia, or in artificial sap, gives absorption maxima characteristic of methylene blue. Azure B found in the sap collected from the vacuole cannot be due to the transformation of methylene blue into this dye after methylene blue has penetrated into the vacuole from the external solution because no such transformation detectable by this method is found to take place within 3 hours after dissolving methylene blue in the sap of Valonia. These experiments indicate that the penetration of dye into the vacuole from methylene blue solution represents a diffusion of azure B in the form of free base. This result agrees with the theory that a basic dye penetrates the vacuole of living cells chiefly in the form of free base and only very slightly in the form of salt. But as soon as the cells are injured the methylene blue (in form of salt) enters the vacuole. It is suggested that these experiments do not show that methylene blue does not enter the protoplasm, but they point out the danger of basing any theoretical conclusion as to permeability on oxidation-reduction potential of living cells from experiments made or the penetration of dye from methylene blue solution into the vacuole, without determining the nature of the dye inside and outside the cell.     

STUDIES ON PENETRATION OF DYES WITH GLASS ELECTRODE : V. WHY DOES AZURE B PENETRATE MORE READILY THAN METHYLENE BLUE OR CRYSTAL VIOLET?

Glass electrode measurements of the pH value of the sap of cells of Nitella show that azure B in the form of free base penetrates the vacuoles and raises the pH value of the sap to about the same degree as the free base of the dye added to the sap in vitro, but the dye salt dissolved in the sap does not alter the pH value of the sap. It is concluded that the dye penetrates the vacuoles chiefly in the form of free base and not as salt. The dye from methylene blue solution containing azure B free base as impurity penetrates and accumulates in the vacuole. This dye must be azure B in the form of free base, since it raises the pH value of the sap to about the same extent as the free base of azure B dissolved in the sap in vitro. The dye absorbed by the chloroform from methylene blue solution behaves like the dye penetrating the vacuole. These results confirm those of spectrophotometric analysis previously published. Crystal violet exists only in one form between pH 5 and pH 9.2, and does not alter the pH value of the sap at the concentrations used. It does not penetrate readily unless cells are injured. A theory of "multiple partition coefficients" is described which explains the mechanism of the behavior of living cells to these dyes. When the protoplasm is squeezed into the sap, the pH value of the mixture is higher than that of the pure sap. The behavior of such a mixture to the dye is very much like that of the sap except that with azure B and methylene blue the rise in the pH value of such a mixture is not so pronounced as with sap when the dye penetrates into the vacuoles. Spectrophotometric measurements show that the dye which penetrates from methylene blue solution has a primary absorption maximum at 653 to 655 mµ (i.e., is a mixture of azure B and methylene blue, with preponderance of azure B) whether we take the sap alone or the sap plus protoplasm. These results confirm those previously obtained with spectrophotometric measurements.     

Zinc Chloride Methylene Blue, Ii. Preparation of Giesma and Wright Type Low Azure B Blood Stains from Dichromate Oxidized Commercial Dye

TO determine the amount of K₂Cr₂O₇ required to produce optimal Giemsa type staining, six 1 g amounts (corrected for dye content) of zinc methylene blue were oxidized with graded quantities of K₂Cr₂O₇ to produce 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24% conversion of methylene blue to azure B. These were heated with a blank control 15 minutes at 100 C in 60-65 ml 0.4 N HCI. cooled, and adjusted to 50 ml to give 20 mg original dye/ml. Aliquots were then diluted to 1% and stains were made by the “Wet Giemsa” technic (Lillie and Donaldson 1979) using 6 ml 1% polychrome methylene blue, 4 ml 1% cosin (corrected for dye content), 2 ml 0.1 M pH 6.3 phosphate buffer, 5 ml acetone, and 23 ml distilled water. The main is added last and methanol fixed blood films are stained immediately for 20-40 min.

For methylene blue supplied by MCB 12-H-29, optimal stains were obtained with preparations containing 20 and 24% conversion of methylene blue to azure B. With methylene blue supplied by Aldrich (080787), 16% conversion of methylene blue to azure B was optimal. Eosinates prepared from a low azure B/methylene blue preparation selected in this way give good stains when used as a Wright stain in 0.3% methanol solution. However, when the 600 mg eosinate solution in glycerol methanol is supplemented with 160 mg of the same azure B/methylene blue chloride the mixture fails to perform well. The HCI precipitation of the chloride apparently produces the zinc methylene blue chloride salt which is poorly soluble in alcohol. It appears necessary to have a zinc-free azure B/methylene blue chloride to supplement the probably zinc-free eosinate used in the Giemsa mixture.     

Subsidiary Dyes in Methylene Blue

Suitable tests have been devised for the detection of azure B (trimethyl thonin) and methylene violet in methylene blue. All samples of methylene blue examined have been found to contain appreciable proportions of azure B.     

Colorimetry for the Stain Technologist. IV. Analysis of the Components of Color Difference

Total color differences have been calculated for various pairs of stained microscopic substrates. The latter include azure B/eosin stained blood cells and Papanicolsou stained cells from the uterine cervix. Both the CIE Luv and Lab color spaces have been used. Total color differences have been analyzed in terms of lightness, hue and chroma components. Various discrepancies have been noted among these components, especially the chroma difference, for the two spaces. It is concluded that current color-difference formulae are less than perfect, although they can provide much useful information.     

Subsidiary Dyes in Methylene Blue

Suitable tests have been devised for the detection of azure B (trimethyl thonin) and methylene violet in methylene blue. All samples of methylene blue examined have been found to contain appreciable proportions of azure B.     

Mechanisms of giemsa banding of chromosomes. I. Giemsa-11 banding with azure and eosin.

Two components of Giemsa are necessary to obtain Giemsa-11 banding. These are an azure (either azure A or B) and eosin Y. The conditions under which azure and eosin interact to differentiate 9qh and other magenta-colored regions involve: (1) the absolute concentrations and ratio of the two dyes; (2) the pH and, to a lesser extent (3) the buffer composition of the staining solution. Differentiation is accompanied by the presence of magenta-colored precipitate, the formation of which is altered by any of the above-mentioned conditions. The absorption spectra of magentacolored and adjacent pale blue regions, measured in situ, show a significant change from those of dye mixtures and dye components in solution. These changes suggest the formation of an azure-eosinate complex. At neutral pH, differentiation of magenta-colored regions is not successful under conditions which denature DNA; e.g. (1) high temperatures; or (2) incubation in formamide. At alkaline pH (11.6), neither moderately high temperature nor fixation of chromosomes with formalin appears to affect Giemsa-11 banding. Thus, differential denaturation of DNA does not appear to play a key role.     

Colorimetry for the stain technologist. IV. Analysis of the components of color difference

Total color differences have been calculated for various pairs of stained microscopic substrates. The latter include azure B/eosin stained blood cells and Papanicolaou stained cells from the uterine cervix. Both the CIE L*u*v* and L*a*b* color spaces have been used. Total color differences have been analyzed in terms of lightness, hue and chroma components. Various discrepancies have been noted among these components, especially the chroma difference, for the two spaces. It is concluded that current color-difference formulae are less than perfect, although they can provide much useful information.     

Decontamination of aqueous solutions of biological stains.

Aqueous solutions of a number of biological stains were completely decontaminated to the limit of detection using Amberlite resins. Amberlite XAD-16 was the most generally applicable resin but Amberlite XAD-2, Amberlite XAD-4, and Amberlite XAD-7 could be used to decontaminate some solutions. Solutions of acridine orange, alcian blue 8GX, alizarin red S, azure A, azure B, Congo red, cresyl violet acetate, crystal violet, eosin B, erythrosin B, ethidium bromide, Janus green B, methylene blue, neutral red, nigrosin, orcein, propidium iodide, rose Bengal, safranine O, toluidine blue O, and trypan blue could be completely decontaminated to the limit of detection and solutions of eosin Y and Giemsa stain were decontaminated to very low levels (less than 0.02 ppm) using Amberlite XAD-16. Reaction times varied from 10 min to 18 hr. Up to 500 ml of a 100 micrograms/ml solution could be decontaminated per gram of Amberlite XAD-16. Fourteen of the 23 stains tested were found to be mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium. None of the completely decontaminated solutions were found to be mutagenic.