预测蛋白质间相互作用的生物信息学方法

后基因组时代的研究模式,已从原来的序列-结构-功能转向基因表达-系统动力学-生理功能。建立蛋白质间相互作用的完全网络,即蛋白质相互作用组(interactome),将有助于从系统角度加深对细胞结构和功能的认识,并为新药靶点的发现和药物设计提供理论基础。一系列系统分析蛋白质相互作用的实验方法已经建立,近年来,出现了多种预测蛋白质相互作用的生物信息学方法,这些方法不仅是对传统实验方法的有价值的补充,而且能够扩展实验方法的预测范围;同时,在开发这些方法的过程中建立了一些重要的分子进化和分子生物学慨念。本文综述了9种生物信息学方法的原理、方法评估、存在的问题．并分析了这个领域的发展前景。     

蛋白质相互作用的生物信息学研究进展

生命过程的分子基础在于生物分子之间的相互作用,其中蛋白质分子之间的相互作用占有极其重要的地位。研究蛋白质相互作用对于理解生命的真谛、探讨致病微生物的致病机理,以及研究新药提高人们的健康水平具有重要的作用。用生物信息学的方法研究蛋白质的相互作用已经取得了许多重要的成果,但也有很多问题还需解决。本文从蛋白质相互作用的数据库、预测方法、可预测蛋白质相互作用的网上服务、蛋白质相互作用网络等几方面,对蛋白质相互作用的生物信息学研究成果及其存在的问题做了概述。     

评估蛋白质相互作用可信度的生物信息学方法

随着基因组规模的高通量实验鉴定技术和计算预测方法的发展,出现了大量蛋白质相互作用数据,但大规模蛋白质相互作用数据中的较高比例的假阳性影响了相互作用数据的质量。生物信息学方法能够从已有的数据和知识出发,通过计算方法系统评估大规模蛋白质相互作用的可信度。本文从过程模型设计、数据集构建、特征选择与综合属性抽取、一些算法使用、实例概述等方面介绍了生物信息学方法评估蛋白质相互作用可信度的研究特点与进展。     

基于蛋白质网络功能模块的蛋白质功能预测

在破译了基因序列的后基因组时代,随着系统生物学实验的快速发展,产生了大量的蛋白质相互作用数据,利用这些数据寻找功能模块及预测蛋白质功能在功能基因组研究中具有重要意义.打破了传统的基于蛋白质间相似度的聚类模式,直接从蛋白质功能团的角度出发,考虑功能团间的一阶和二阶相互作用,提出了模块化聚类方法(MCM),对实验数据进行聚类分析,来预测模块内未知蛋白质的功能.通过超几何分布P值法和增、删、改相互作用的方法对聚类结果进行预测能力分析和稳定性分析.结果表明,模块化聚类方法具有较高的预测准确度和覆盖率,有很好的容错性和稳定性.此外,模块化聚类分析得到了一些具有高预测准确度的未知蛋白质的预测结果,将会对生物实验有指导意义,其算法对其他具有相似结构的网络也具有普遍意义.     

蛋白质相互作用网络进化分析研究进展

近年来,随着高通量实验技术的发展和广泛应用,越来越多可利用的蛋白质相互作用网络数据开始出现．这些数据为进化研究提供了新的视角．从蛋白质、蛋白质相互作用、模体、模块直到整个网络五个层次,综述了近年来蛋白质相互作用网络进化研究领域的主要进展,侧重于探讨蛋白质相互作用、模体、模块直到整个网络对蛋白质进化的约束作用,以及蛋白质相互作用网络不同于随机网络特性的起源和进化等问题．总结了前人工作给学术界的启示,探讨了该领域未来可能的发展方向．     

基于子块矩阵马尔可夫聚类识别动态蛋白质相互作用网络功能模块

细胞生物过程具有时序动态性,蛋白质功能模块是驱动细胞生物过程的功能单位。为了蛋白质功能模块识别,本文将细胞生物过程建模为动态时序表达相关蛋白质相互作用网络(DTEPIN);构建子块矩阵以表示动态时序表达相关蛋白质相互作用网络;利用子块矩阵特殊性,分析时空复杂度和并行性;优化设计马尔可夫聚类算法,以识别动态时序表达相关蛋白质相互作用网络中的蛋白质功能模块。为了支持基于子块矩阵马尔可夫聚类过程,本文运用图形处理器并行计算矩阵乘积。实验结果表明,与已有同类算法相比,所设计算法识别的蛋白质功能模块,统计匹配质量更高且精确匹配数量更多。     

基于贝叶斯网络和相互作用可信度的蛋白质功能预测方法

蛋白质功能注释是后基因组时代研究的核心内容之一,基于蛋白质相互作用网络的蛋白质功能预测方法越来越受到研究者们的关注.提出了一种基于贝叶斯网络和蛋白质相互作用可信度的蛋白质功能预测方法.该方法在功能预测过程中为待注释的蛋白质建立贝叶斯网络预测模型,并充分考虑了蛋白质相互作用的可信度问题.在构建的芽殖酵母数据集上的三重交叉验证测试表明,在功能预测过程中考虑蛋白质可信度能够有效地提高功能预测的性能.与现有一些算法相比,该方法能够给出令人满意的预测效果.     

计算方法在蛋白质相互作用研究中的应用

计算方法在蛋白质相互作用研究的各个阶段扮演了一个重要的角色。对此,作者将从以下几个方面对计算方法在蛋白质相互作用及相互作用网络研究中的应用做一个概述：蛋白质相互作用数据库及其发展;数据挖掘方法在蛋白质相互作用数据收集和整合中的应用;高通量方法实验结果的验证;根据蛋白质相互作用网络预测和推断未知蛋白质的功能;蛋白质相互作用的预测。     

蛋白质相互作用研究进展

蛋白质行使功能时,需要与其他蛋白质或者其他分子相互作用才能完成.在蛋白质相互作用水平上研究蛋白质对理解蛋白质功能、疾病与进化具有重要的意义.就蛋白质相互作用的预测、常用的蛋白质相互作用数据库以及蛋白质相互作用网络的研究进行了介绍.     

基于相互作用的蛋白质功能预测

蛋白质功能预测是后基因时代研究的热点问题。基于相互作用的蛋白质功能预测方法目前应用比较广泛,但是当"伙伴蛋白质"(interacting partners)数目k较小时,其预测准确率不高。从蛋白质相互作用网络入手,结合"小世界网络"特性,有效解决了k较小时预测准确率不高的问题。对酵母(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)蛋白质的相互作用网络进行预测,当k≤4时其预测准确率比相同条件下的GO(global optimization)方法有一定提高。实验结果表明:该方法能够有效的应用于伙伴蛋白质数目较小时的蛋白质功能预测。     

原生动物的细胞骨架蛋白及其功能组件

目前在原生动物中发现了许多新的细胞骨架蛋白,如中心元蛋白、副鞭毛杆蛋白等。深入研究发现,原生动物的细胞骨架在细胞的模式形成,细胞核的遗传中也具有重要作用。从功能组件角度着眼研究细胞骨架的功能,将有助于了解细胞骨架的进化机制。     

FunMod: A Cytoscape Plugin for Identifying Functional Modules in Undirected Protein–Protein Networks

The characterization of the interacting behaviors of complex biological systems is a primary objective in protein–protein network analysis and computational biology. In this paper we present FunMod, an innovative Cytoscape version 2.8 plugin that is able to mine undirected protein–protein networks and to infer sub-networks of interacting proteins intimately correlated with relevant biological pathways. This plugin may enable the discovery of new pathways involved in diseases. In order to describe the role of each protein within the relevant biological pathways, FunMod computes and scores three topological features of the identified sub-networks. By integrating the results from biological pathway clustering and topological network analysis, FunMod proved to be useful for the data interpretation and the generation of new hypotheses in two case studies.     

Integrating Structural Information to Study the Dynamics of Protein-Protein Interactions in Cells

1. Download high-res image (176KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Interaction between Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Frequently Occurs in a Human Protein-Protein Interaction Network

Intrinsic protein disorder is a widespread phenomenon characterised by a lack of stable three-dimensional structures and is considered to play an important role in protein-protein interactions (PPIs). This study examined the genome-wide preference of disorder in PPIs by using exhaustive disorder prediction in human PPIs. We categorised the PPIs into three types (interaction between disordered proteins, interaction between structured proteins, and interaction between a disordered protein and a structured protein) with regard to the flexibility of molecular recognition and compared these three interaction types in an existing human PPI network with those in a randomised network. Although the structured regions were expected to become the identifiers for binding recognition, this comparative analysis revealed unexpected results. The occurrence of interactions between disordered proteins was significantly frequent, and that between a disordered protein and a structured protein was significantly infrequent. We found that this propensity was much stronger in interactions between nonhub proteins. We also analysed the interaction types from a functional standpoint by using GO, which revealed that the interaction between disordered proteins frequently occurred in cellular processes, regulation, and metabolic processes. The number of interactions, especially in metabolic processes between disordered proteins, was 1.8 times as large as that in the randomised network. Another analysis conducted by using KEGG pathways provided results where several signaling pathways and disease-related pathways included many interactions between disordered proteins. All of these analyses suggest that human PPIs preferably occur between disordered proteins and that the flexibility of the interacting protein pairs may play an important role in human PPI networks.     

Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Protein Signature Profiling

Protein domains are conserved and functionally independent structures that play an important role in interactions among related proteins. Domain-domain inter- actions have been recently used to predict protein-protein interactions (PPI). In general, the interaction probability of a pair of domains is scored using a trained scoring function. Satisfying a threshold, the protein pairs carrying those domains are regarded as “interacting“. In this study, the signature contents of proteins were utilized to predict PPI pairs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis ele- gans, and Homo sapiens. Similarity between protein signature patterns was scored and PPI predictions were drawn based on the binary similarity scoring function. Results show that the true positive rate of prediction by the proposed approach is approximately 32% higher than that using the maximum likelihood estimation method when compared with a test set, resulting in 22% increase in the area un- der the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. When proteins containing one or two signatures were removed, the sensitivity of the predicted PPI pairs in- creased significantly. The predicted PPI pairs are on average 11 times more likely to interact than the random selection at a confidence level of 0.95, and on aver- age 4 times better than those predicted by either phylogenetic profiling or gene expression profiling.     

Computational Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions in Rice Based on the Predicted Rice Interactome Network

Plant protein-protein interaction networks have not been identified by large-scale experiments. In order to better understand the protein interactions in rice, the Predicted Rice Interactome Network (PRIN; http://bis.zju.edu.cn/ prin/) presented 76,585 predicted interactions involving 5,049 rice proteins. After mapping genomic features of rice (GO annotation, subcellular localization prediction, and gene expression), we found that a well-annotated and biologically significant network is rich enough to capture many significant functional linkages within higher-order biological systems, such as pathways and biological processes. Furthermore, we took MADS-box do- main-containing proteins and circadian rhythm signaling pathways as examples to demonstrate that functional protein complexes and biological pathways could be effectively expanded in our predicted network. The expanded molecular network in PRIN has considerably improved the capability of these analyses to integrate existing knowledge and provide novel insights into the function and coordination of genes and gene networks.     

Predicting Disease-Related Proteins Based on Clique Backbone in Protein-Protein Interaction Network

Network biology integrates different kinds of data, including physical or functional networks and disease gene sets, to interpret human disease. A clique (maximal complete subgraph) in a protein-protein interaction network is a topological module and possesses inherently biological significance. A disease-related clique possibly associates with complex diseases. Fully identifying disease components in a clique is conductive to uncovering disease mechanisms. This paper proposes an approach of predicting disease proteins based on cliques in a protein-protein interaction network. To tolerate false positive and negative interactions in protein networks, extending cliques and scoring predicted disease proteins with gene ontology terms are introduced to the clique-based method. Precisions of predicted disease proteins are verified by disease phenotypes and steadily keep to more than 95%. The predicted disease proteins associated with cliques can partly complement mapping between genotype and phenotype, and provide clues for understanding the pathogenesis of serious diseases.     

Comparative Analysis of Protein-Protein Interactions in Cancer-Associated Genes 25

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have been widely studied to understand the bi-ological processes or molecular functions associated with different disease systems like cancer. While focused studies on individual cancers have generated valuable in-formation, global and comparative analysis of datasets from different cancer types has not been done. In this work, we carried out bioinformatic analysis of PPIs corresponding to differentially expressed genes from microarrays of various tumor tissues (belonging to bladder, colon, kidney and thyroid cancers) and compared their associated biological processes and molecular functions (based on Gene On-tology terms). We identified a set of processes or functions that are common to all these cancers, as well as those that are specific to only one or partial cancer types. Similarly, protein interaction networks in nucleic acid metabolism were compared to identify the common/specific clusters of proteins across different cancer types. Our results provide a basis for further experimental investigations to study protein interaction networks associated with cancer. The methodology developed in this work can also be applied to study similar disease systems.