张掖湿地甲烷通量动态特征及其影响因子

于2012年7月—2014年6月对地处干旱区的张掖湿地甲烷(CH_4)通量进行观测,分析其CH_4通量的变化特征及其影响因子。结果表明:CH_4通量的日变化趋势总体表现为白天大于夜间;不同季节CH_4通量排放特征差异明显,夏季最大,春秋次之,冬季最小;CH_4通量日总量与空气温度、土壤温度之间指数相关关系显著,其中4 cm处土壤温度与之相关性最强;1—6月摩擦风速(U*)与CH_4通量显著正相关;结合CO_2通量观测数据,研究时段张掖湿地净碳吸收量为495.92 g C m~(-2)a~(-1),为明显碳汇。     

博斯腾湖人工和天然芦苇湿地土壤CO2、CH4和N2O排放通量

为研究干旱区淡水湖泊人工、天然芦苇湿地土壤温室气体源汇强度及其影响因素,采用静态箱-气相色谱法,于2015年1月—12月对博斯腾湖人工和天然芦苇湿地土壤CO_2、CH_4和N_2O通量进行全年观测。结果表明,人工芦苇湿地土壤CO_2、CH_4和N_2O排放通量变化范围分别为:10.1—588.4mg m~(-2)h~(-1)、2.9—82.4μg m~(-2)h~(-1)和1.32—29.7μg m~(-2)h~(-1),天然芦苇湿地土壤CO_2、CH_4和N_2O排放通量变化范围分别为10.3—469.6mg m~(-2)h~(-1)、3.1—64.8μg m~(-2)h~(-1)和1.9—14.3μg m~(-2)h~(-1)。人工和天然芦苇湿地夏季土壤CO_2排放通量均明显高于其他季节,而土壤CH_4和N_2O排放通量较大值多集中在春末夏初。全年观测期间,人工芦苇湿地土壤CO_2、CH_4和N_2O排放通量高于天然芦苇湿地(P0.05);温度是影响人工、天然芦苇湿地土壤CO_2和N_2O排放通量的关键因素,近地面温度和5cm土壤温度与CO_2和N_2O排放通量呈现极显著的正相关关系(P0.01)。土壤CH_4排放通量是温度和水分二者共同影响的,由近地表温度、5cm土壤温度和土壤含水量共同拟合的方程可以分别解释人工、天然芦苇湿地土壤CH_4排放通量的71%、74.5%;土壤有机碳、pH、盐分、NH_4~+-N、NO_3~--N也是人工、天然芦苇湿地土壤CO_2、CH_4和N_2O排放通量的影响因素;人工和天然芦苇湿地土壤均是CO_2、CH_4和N_2O的"源"。基于100年尺度,由3种温室气体计算全球增温潜势得出,人工芦苇湿地全球增温潜势大于天然芦苇湿地(15150.18kg/hm~212484.21kg/hm~2)。     

辽河口滨海湿地CH4排放特征及其影响因素

采用静态箱-气相色谱法,于2016年6—11月连续观测辽河口芦苇湿地、翅碱蓬湿地和裸滩湿地的CH_4排放速率,同时测定温度、氧化还原电位(Eh)、pH值和电导率(EC)等相关环境因子的动态变化。结果表明,3种类型湿地的CH_4排放具有明显的季节变化特征,均呈先上升后下降趋势。芦苇湿地、翅碱蓬湿地(涨潮前)和裸滩湿地(涨潮前)CH_4排放通量变化范围分别为0.447—10.40、0.045—0.509 mg m~(-2) h~(-1)和0.016—0.593 mg m~(-2) h~(-1),观测期内排放通量均值相应为(3.699±3.679)、(0.165±0.156) mg m~(-2) h~(-1)和(0.198±0.191) mg m~(-2) h~(-1),不同类型湿地之间差异显著(P0.01),芦苇湿地裸滩湿地(涨潮前)翅碱蓬湿地(涨潮前)。涨潮过程中,翅碱蓬湿地和裸滩湿地的排放速率分别变化在0.009—0.353 mg m~(-2) h~(-1)和0.018—0.335 mg m~(-2) h~(-1),观测期间其排放速率均值分别为(0.119±0.132) mg m~(-2) h~(-1)和(0.131±0.103) mg m~(-2) h~(-1),明显低于涨潮前(P0.01)。不同湿地类型间CH_4排放通量与电导率(EC)呈显著负相关(P0.01)。研究结果表明,潮汐和电导率均为影响辽河口不同类型湿地中CH_4排放的关键因子。     

模拟SO42-沉降对闽江口淡水感潮野慈姑湿地甲烷排放通量的影响

2015年12月—2016年10月,每月小潮日原位定期向闽江口塔礁洲淡水感潮野慈姑(Sagittaria trifolia L.)湿地施加剂量为60、120 kg S hm~(-2)a~(-1)的K_2SO_4溶液(分别记做S-60和S-120),探讨模拟硫酸根(SO_4~(2-))沉降对河口淡水感潮湿地甲烷(CH4)排放通量及间隙水SO_4~(2-)浓度的影响。对照、S-60和S-120处理组CH_4排放通量年均值分别为(7.88±1.00)mg h~(-1)m~(-2)、(6.55±0.97)mg h~(-1)m~(-2)和(6.66±1.49)mg h~(-1)m~(-2)。在年尺度上,两个高强度模拟SO_4~(2-)沉降处理组均未显著降低闽江口淡水感潮野慈姑湿地CH_4排放通量(P0.05),即高强度SO_4~(2-)沉降不会对河口淡水感潮湿地CH_4排放通量产生类似于其对泥炭湿地和水稻田的显著抑制效应。在年尺度以及秋、冬季,两个施加K_2SO_4溶液处理显著增加了野慈姑湿地10 cm深度土壤间隙水SO_4~(2-)浓度。对于各个处理组,温度较高的夏、秋季CH_4排放通量均显著高于温度相对较低的冬、春季(P0.05)。不同处理组CH_4排放通量均与土壤温度呈显著正相关关系,温度仍然是影响亚热带河口淡水感潮湿地CH_4排放通量的重要环境因子。     

放牧对若尔盖高原湿地CH4排放的影响

湿地是大气甲烷(CH_4)的主要排放源,而有关放牧对湿地CH_4排放的影响特征仍未得到足够的报道。因此,通过静态箱法,研究了放牧对四川省若尔盖高原湿地CH_4排放的影响,CH_4气体通过快速温室气体分析仪测量。结果表明:放牧样地和围栏内样地生长季CH_4排放量为(31.32±19.57)g/m~2和(30.31±23.46)g/m~2,它们之间无差异显著;但是集中放牧期间(7—9月),放牧样地(21.01±12.35)g/m~2较围栏内样地显著增加了CH_4排放量为54.3%。2014年生长季期间通过刈割植物模拟放牧表明两种刈割强度CH_4排放量为(5.01±5.37)g/m~2和(4.69±5.99)g/m~2,较未刈割样地(1.15±1.89)g/m~2增加了335.9%和308.0%,其原因可能是放牧或者刈割减少地表植物生物量,降低植物高度,缩短了CH_4排放的路径距离。该结果可为我国高原湿地保护与管理决策提供基础数据支撑。     

模拟降水减少对中亚热带杉木人工林土壤甲烷吸收的影响

森林土壤是大气中甲烷重要的汇,降水变化是影响森林土壤甲烷吸收速率(V_(CH_4))的重要因子。以中亚热带地区不同降水减少程度的杉木林土壤为研究对象,采用静态箱-气相色谱法来测定不同模拟降水减少处理样地的土壤甲烷吸收速率。结果表明:模拟降水减少后显著改变了土壤中的含水量,降水减少60%、降水减少20%和对照样地的年均土壤含水量分别为18.87%、23.89%和28.33%。杉木人工林土壤甲烷吸收速率在月变化上存在较大幅度的波动,其中土壤甲烷吸收速率在8月份达到一年中的最大值(对照75μg m~(-2) h~(-1)),2月份达到一年中的最小值(对照10.93μg m~(-2) h~(-1))。3种处理样地的土壤全年均为甲烷汇,与对照样地的甲烷年通量(2.48 kg hm~(-2) a~(-1))相比,降水减少60%和20%样地的甲烷年通量分别增加44%和19%。在对照样地中,土壤甲烷吸收速率与土壤含水量呈现负相关(P=0.001),与温度相关性不显著(P0.05);而模拟降水减少后,土壤甲烷吸收速率与土壤温度呈正相关关系(P=0.006和P=0.034),与土壤含水量相关性不显著(P0.05)。总之,模拟降水减少后不仅提高了杉木人工林土壤甲烷吸收的能力,同时也可能改变影响土壤甲烷吸收的环境因子;在模拟降水减少前土壤甲烷吸收速率与土壤水分相关性更为密切,而模拟降水减少后土壤甲烷吸收速率可能主要受土壤温度的影响。     

基于机器学习估算青藏高原多年冻土区草地净初级生产力

净初级生产力(NPP)的估算还存在很大的不确定性。本文利用机器学习算法(RF和RBF-ANN)估算了2002—2018年青藏高原多年冻土区草地NPP,分析了青藏高原多年冻土区草地NPP的时空格局、变化特征及其对气候因子的响应。结果表明:(1)机器学习估算结果可靠,简单易行。(2)青藏高原多年冻土区草地NPP表现为东南向西北逐渐递减的趋势;NPP总量为175.39 Tg C·a~(-1),单位面积均值为164.10 g C·m~(-2)·a~(-1),呈波动上升的趋势。(3)青藏高原多年冻土区草地NPP增加的面积占20.49%;各草地类型的NPP增长幅度不一致表现为高寒沼泽草甸高寒草甸高寒草原高寒荒漠草原。(4)温度是青藏高原多年冻土区草地NPP变化的主导因子,降水的影响沿东南向西北逐渐减弱。     

大兴安岭永久冻土区7种沼泽类型土壤温室气体排放特征

气候变暖及永久冻土退化将会增加冻土湿地的温室气体排放,但关于大兴安岭永久冻土区沼泽湿地温室气体通量及主控因子尚不明确。采用静态箱-气相色谱法,同步原位观测大兴安岭永久冻土区7种天然沼泽类型(草丛沼泽-C、灌丛沼泽-G、毛赤杨沼泽-M、白桦沼泽-B、落叶松苔草沼泽-LT、落叶松藓类沼泽-LX、落叶松泥炭藓沼泽-LN)土壤CO_2、CH_4和N_2O通量及土壤温度、水位、化冻深度及土壤碳氮含量、碳氮比、pH值及含水量,揭示永久冻土区沼泽土壤温室气体通量及其主控因子。结果表明:1) 7种沼泽类型土壤CO_2年均通量(125.12—163.33 mg m~(-2) h~(-1))相近;2) CH_4年均通量(-0.007—0.400 mg m~(-2) h~(-1))呈草丛显著高于其他沼泽5.6—65.7倍(P0.01);3) N_2O年均通量(1.52—37.90μg m~(-2) h~(-1))呈阔叶林沼泽显著高于其他类型2.0—23.9倍,针叶林沼泽显著高于草丛、灌丛沼泽2.9—6.2倍(P0.05);4) CO_2主控因子为土壤温度和水位;CH_4主控因子为土壤温度和化冻深度;N_2O受到多种环境因子综合调控,共同可以解释N_2O变化的26%—99%;5)土壤增温潜势(11.05—15.37 t CO_2 hm~(-2) a~(-1))相近,且均以CO_2占绝对优势地位,但草丛以CH_4占次要地位,森林沼泽则以N_2O占次要地位。综合对比国内外现有研究结果发现目前大兴安岭永久冻土区沼泽土壤仍处于CO_2、CH_4和N_2O低排放阶段。     

青藏高原两种植被类型净初级生产力与气候因素的关系及周转值分析

基于2008—2016年青海海北站9年净初级生产力及气候因子监测数据,分析了青藏高原高寒小嵩草草甸和高寒金露梅灌丛两种植被净初级生产力年际动态,并探讨了气候因子对其影响及其不同土层深度根系周转值特征。结果表明:(1)年际尺度上,小嵩草草甸地上净初级生产力表现为显著增加趋势,增幅为7.02 g m~(-2) a~(-1),而金露梅灌丛地上净初级生产力相对较为稳定;对于其地下净初级生产力和总生产力,小嵩草草甸和金露梅灌丛均表现为增加趋势(P0.05),9年间小嵩草草甸地上、地下和总净初级生产力平均值分别为(217.55±9.95)、(1882.75±161.33) g m~(-2) a~(-1)和(2100.30±163.38) g m~(-2) a~(-1),金露梅灌丛地上、地下和总净初级生产力9年间平均值分别为(256.27±11.4)、(1614.31±173.03) g m~(-2) a~(-1)和(1870.58±177.93) g m~(-2) a~(-1)。(2)不同植被类型地上净初级生产力对气候因素响应不同,金露梅灌丛地上净初级生产力主要受温度影响,而温度对小嵩草草甸地上净初级生产力无显著影响。此外,降水不是限制高寒生态系统草地地上净初级生产力主要因子,相比于降水影响,高寒生态系统地上净初级生产力更受温度调控。(3)年均温和年降水对金露梅灌丛和小嵩草草甸地下净初级生产力均无显著影响(P0.05),表明高寒生态系统,其地下生产力受外界气候条件变化影响微弱,是一个稳定的碳库。(4)两种植被类型其根系周转值均随着土壤深度的增加呈逐渐增加趋势,且高寒灌丛根系周转值明显高于高寒草甸根系周转值。研究表明,在全球气候变暖背景下将会增加金露梅灌丛地上净初级生产力,而对小嵩草草甸地上净初级生产力无显著影响。     

新疆古尔班通古特沙漠土壤N_2O、CH_4和CO_2通量及其对氮沉降增加的响应

沙漠土壤在全球土壤主要温室气体通量中扮演着重要角色,但是在环境变化条件下的通量估算结果存在很大的不确定性。在新疆古尔班通古特沙漠设定N0、N0.5、N1、N3、N6和N24 6个样方,以0、0.5、1.0、3.0、6.0和24.0 g·m~(–2)·a~(–1) 6个不同模拟氮(N)沉降浓度进行N处理,两年后开始对施N样方进行为期两个生长季的N_2O、CH_4和CO_2通量测定。研究表明生长季对照样方(N0)的N_2O、CH_4和CO_2的平均通量分别为4.8μg·m~(–2)·h~(–1)、–30.5μg·m~(–2)·h~(–1)和46.7 mg·m~(–2)·h~(–1),季节变化显著影响3种气体的通量。N0、N0.5和N1在春季和夏季具有相似的N_2O排放速率,排放速率高于秋季,而N6和N24的N_2O排放主要受N输入时间影响;CH_4的吸收在春季和夏季相对较高,秋季较低;CO_2的排放量在第一年春季和夏季之间变化较小,但高于秋季排放量,第二年CO_2动态与N浓度相关。N增加通常能显著促进N_2O的排放,但受测定季节和年度的影响,且各处理的N_2O排放因子大小无明显规律;CH_4的吸收受N增加影响不显著;CO_2的排放在第一年不受N增加的影响,第二年高浓度N增加对春季和夏季CO_2排放具有限制作用,对秋季影响不显著。结构方程模型的研究表明,对N_2O、CH_4和CO_2的动态变化影响较大的因子分别是施N浓度、土壤温度或土壤含水量和植株密度。整个生长季由N带来的净通量和增温潜力非常小。     

The positive net radiative greenhouse gas forcing of increasing methane emissions from a thawing boreal forest‐wetland landscape

At the southern margin of permafrost in North America, climate change causes widespread permafrost thaw. In boreal lowlands, thawing forested permafrost peat plateaus (‘forest’) lead to expansion of permafrost‐free wetlands (‘wetland’). Expanding wetland area with saturated and warmer organic soils is expected to increase landscape methane (CH₄) emissions. Here, we quantify the thaw‐induced increase in CH₄ emissions for a boreal forest‐wetland landscape in the southern Taiga Plains, Canada, and evaluate its impact on net radiative forcing relative to potential long‐term net carbon dioxide (CO₂) exchange. Using nested wetland and landscape eddy covariance net CH₄ flux measurements in combination with flux footprint modeling, we find that landscape CH₄ emissions increase with increasing wetland‐to‐forest ratio. Landscape CH₄ emissions are most sensitive to this ratio during peak emission periods, when wetland soils are up to 10 °C warmer than forest soils. The cumulative growing season (May–October) wetland CH₄ emission of ~13 g CH₄ m^?2 is the dominating contribution to the landscape CH₄ emission of ~7 g CH₄ m^?2. In contrast, forest contributions to landscape CH₄ emissions appear to be negligible. The rapid wetland expansion of 0.26 ± 0.05% yr^?1 in this region causes an estimated growing season increase of 0.034 ± 0.007 g CH₄ m^?2 yr^?1 in landscape CH₄ emissions. A long‐term net CO₂ uptake of >200 g CO₂ m^?2 yr^?1 is required to offset the positive radiative forcing of increasing CH₄ emissions until the end of the 21st century as indicated by an atmospheric CH₄ and CO₂ concentration model. However, long‐term apparent carbon accumulation rates in similar boreal forest‐wetland landscapes and eddy covariance landscape net CO₂ flux measurements suggest a long‐term net CO₂ uptake between 49 and 157 g CO₂ m^?2 yr^?1. Thus, thaw‐induced CH₄ emission increases likely exert a positive net radiative greenhouse gas forcing through the 21st century.     

Methane emissions from tropical freshwater wetlands located in different climatic zones of Costa Rica

Wetlands are the largest natural source of the greenhouse gas methane to the atmosphere. Despite the fact that a large percentage of wetlands occur in tropical latitudes, methane emissions from natural tropical wetlands have not been extensively studied. The objective this research was to compare methane emissions from three natural tropical wetlands located in different climatic and ecological areas of Costa Rica. Each wetland was within a distinct ecosystem: (1) a humid flow‐through wetland slough with high mean annual temperatures (25.9 °C) and precipitation (3700 mm yr^?1); (2) a stagnant rainforest wetland with high mean annual temperatures (24.9 °C) and precipitation (4400 mm yr^?1); or (3) a seasonally wet riverine wetland with very high mean annual temperatures (28.2 °C) and lower mean annual precipitation (1800 mm yr^?1). Methane emission rates were measured from sequential gas samples using nonsteady state plastic chambers during six sampling periods over a 29‐month period from 2006 to 2009. Methane emissions were higher than most rates previously reported for tropical wetlands with means (medians) of 91 (52), 601 (79), and 719 (257) mg CH₄‐C m^?2 day^?1 for the three sites, with highest rates seen at the seasonally flooded wetland site. Methane emissions were statistically higher at the seasonally wet site than at the humid sites (P<0.001). Highest methane emissions occurred when surface water levels were between 30 and 50 cm. The interaction of soil temperature, water depth, and seasonal flooding most likely affected methanogenesis in these tropical sites. We estimate that Costa Rican wetlands produce about 0.80 Tg yr^?1 of methane, or approximately 0.6% of global tropical wetland emissions. Elevated methane emissions at the seasonally wet/warmer wetland site suggest that some current humid tropical freshwater wetlands of Central America could emit more methane if temperatures increase and precipitation becomes more seasonal with climate change.     

Regional-scale measurements of CH4 exchange from a tall tower over a mixed temperate/boreal lowland and wetland forest

The biosphere–atmosphere exchange of methane (CH₄) was estimated for a temperate/boreal lowland and wetland forest ecosystem in northern Wisconsin for 1997–1999 using the modified Bowen ratio (MBR) method. Gradients of CH₄ and CO₂ and CO₂ flux were measured on the 447‐m WLEF‐TV tower as part of the Chequamegon Ecosystem–Atmosphere Study (ChEAS). No systematic diurnal variability was observed in regional CH₄ fluxes measured using the MBR method. In all 3 years, regional CH₄ emissions reached maximum values during June–August (24±14.4 mg m^?2 day^?1), coinciding with periods of maximum soil temperatures. In 1997 and 1998, the onset in CH₄ emission was coincident with increases in ground temperatures following the melting of the snow cover. The onset of emission in 1999 lagged 100 days behind the 1997 and 1998 onsets, and was likely related to postdrought recovery of the regional water table to typical levels. The net regional emissions were 3.0, 3.1, and 2.1 g CH₄ m^?2 for 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively. Annual emissions for wetland regions within the source area (28% of the land area) were 13.2, 13.8, and 10.3 g CH₄ m^?2 assuming moderate rates of oxidation of CH₄ in upland regions in 1997, 1998, and 1999, respectively. Scaling these measurements to the Chequamegon Ecosystem (CNNF) and comparing with average wetland emissions between 40°N and 50°N suggests that wetlands in the CNNF emit approximately 40% less than average wetlands at this latitude. Differences in mean monthly air temperatures did not affect the magnitude of CH₄ emissions; however, reduced precipitation and water table levels suppressed CH₄ emission during 1999, suggesting that long‐term climatic changes that reduce the water table will likely transform this landscape to a reduced source or possibly a sink for atmospheric CH₄.     

High carbon emissions from thermokarst lakes and their determinants in the Tibet Plateau

Thermokarst lakes are potentially important sources of methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂). However, considerable uncertainty exists regarding carbon emissions from thermokarst lakes owing to a limited understanding of their patterns and motivators. In this study, we measured CH₄ and CO₂ diffusive fluxes in 163 thermokarst lakes in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (QTP) over 3 years from May to October. The median carbon emissions from the QTP thermokarst lakes were 1440 mg CO₂ m⁻² day⁻¹ and 60 mg CH₄ m⁻² day⁻¹, respectively. The diffusive rates of CO₂ and CH₄ are related to the catchment land cover type. Sediment microbial abundance and hydrochemistry explain 51.9% and 38.3% of the total variance in CH₄ diffusive emissions, respectively, while CO₂ emissions show no significant relationship with environmental factors. When upscaling carbon emissions from the QTP thermokarst lakes, the annual average CH₄ release per lake area is equal to that of the pan-Arctic region. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating in situ observation data with different emission pathways for different land cover types in predicting carbon emissions from thermokarst lakes in the future.     

潮汐作用对黄河三角洲盐沼湿地甲烷排放的影响

盐沼湿地作为陆海交互作用的过渡带是CH₄重要的自然来源。潮汐活动通过影响CH₄的产生、氧化和传输驱动了湿地CH₄间歇性、周期性的排放。利用涡度相关和微气象监测技术,对黄河三角洲一个盐地碱蓬生态系统CH₄通量、环境因子和水文要素（潮汐）进行了长期连续监测分析了该生态系统生长季CH₄排放的季节动态及潮汐作用对CH₄排放的影响。结果表明：生长季该生态系统是CH₄的排放源,排放日均值为0.063 mg m^-2 h^-1,（范围为-0.36-0.57 mg m^-2 h^-1）。潮汐淹水阶段和落潮后湿润阶段表现为CH₄的显著源。此外我们发现,短期潮汐活动引起土壤干湿状况的变化促进了CH₄脉冲式的排放,因此未来气候变化下温度升高和降雨季节分配引起的土壤干湿变化将会对该区域CH₄排放甚至碳循环产生积极影响。     

鄱阳湖苔草湿地甲烷释放特征

2009年5月-2010年4月在鄱阳湖南矶湿地国家级自然保护区选择以灰化苔草为建群种的洲滩,设置土壤-植物系统(TC)、剪除植物地上部分 (TJ)2个试验处理,利用密闭箱-气相色谱法测定了鄱阳湖典型苔草湿地的甲烷(CH₄)释放通量。结果表明:1)TC、TJ 2个试验处理CH₄释放速率变化范围分别为-0.094-17.75 mg · m^-2 · h^-1、-0.122-19.16 mg · m^-2 · h^-1,均表现出明显的季节变化规律;2)地表未淹水期间,剪草处理CH₄释放显著高于非剪草处理(t=2.69, P<0.05);地表淹水达到15 cm后,剪草处理CH₄释放明显低于非剪草处理。3)土壤5 cm温度、土壤水分与2处理非淹水期间CH₄释放速率均呈显著正相关,是非淹水期间CH₄通量变化的主要控制因子,2因子能够共同解释非淹水期苔草湿地65%-74%的CH₄通量变异;4)试验期间,苔草湿地CH₄释放量约为12.77 gC/m²,相当于同期土壤有机质分解碳排放量的4%,甲烷释放的碳消耗不足苔草湿地年NPP的1%。     

Nitrogen retention versus methane emission: Environmental benefits and risks of large-scale wetland creation

Coastal eutrophication by nutrient fluxes from agricultural land to marine recipients is presently combated by measures such as the implementation of watershed-scale wetland creation programs aimed at nitrogen removal. Such created agricultural wetlands - termed ‘nitrogen farming wetlands’ (NFWs) - receive nitrogen (N) loads predominantly as nitrate, facilitating N removal by denitrification. However, the conversion of agricultural soils into waterlogged wetland area is likely to increase climate gas emissions, particularly methane (CH₄). There is thus a need to evaluate the benefits and risks of wetland creation at a large, watershed-scale.Here we investigate N retention and CH₄ emission originating from watershed-scale wetland creation in South Sweden, the relation between both processes, and how CH₄ emission depends on individual wetland parameters. We combine data from intensively studied reference wetlands with an extensive wetland survey to predict N retention and CH₄ emission with simple models, to estimate the overall process rates (large-scale effects) as well as spatial variation among individual NFWs.We show that watershed-scale wetland creation serves targeted environmental objectives (N retention), and that CH₄ emission is comparably low. Environmental benefit and risk of individual wetlands were not correlated, and may thus be managed independently. High cover of aquatic plants was the most important wetland property that suppressed CH₄ net production, potentially facilitating N retention simultaneously. Further, differences between wetlands in water temperature and wetland age seemed to contribute to differences in CH₄ net production. The nationally planned wetland creation (12,000 ha) could make a significant contribution to the targeted reduction of N fluxes (up to 27% of the Swedish environmental objective), at an environmental risk equaling 0.04% of the national anthropogenic climate gas emission.     

Methane emissions from freshwater riverine wetlands

To better understand methane emissions from freshwater riverine wetlands, seasonal and spatial patterns of methane emissions were measured over a 1-year period from created freshwater marshes and a river division oxbow, and at a river-floodplain edge (riverside) in central Ohio, USA. Plots were distributed from inflow to outflow and from shallow transition edges to deep water zones in the marshes and oxbow. Median values of CH₄ emissions ranged from 0.33 to 85.7 mg-CH₄-C m⁻² h⁻¹, at the riverside sites and 0.02-20.5 mg CH₄-C m⁻² h⁻¹ in the created marshes. The naturally colonizing marsh had more methane emissions (p = 0.047) than did the planted marsh, probably due to a history of higher net primary productivity in the former. A significant dry period and lower productivity in the oxbow may explain its low range of methane emissions of −0.04 to 0.09 mg CH₄-C m⁻² h⁻¹. There were significantly higher rates of methane emissions in deep water zones compared to transition zones in the created marshes. Overall CH₄ emissions had significant relationships with organic carbon and soil temperature and appear to depend on the hydroperiod and vegetation development. Riparian wetlands can be designed to minimize greenhouse gas emissions while providing other ecosystem services.     

Methane emissions from rice paddies natural wetlands,lakes in China: synthesis new estimate

Sources of methane (CH₄) become highly variable for countries undergoing a heightened period of development due to both human activity and climate change. An urgent need therefore exists to budget key sources of CH₄, such as wetlands (rice paddies and natural wetlands) and lakes (including reservoirs and ponds), which are sensitive to these changes. For this study, references in relation to CH₄ emissions from rice paddies, natural wetlands, and lakes in China were first reviewed and then reestimated based on the review itself. Total emissions from the three CH₄ sources were 11.25 Tg CH₄ yr^?1 (ranging from 7.98 to 15.16 Tg CH₄ yr^?1). Among the emissions, 8.11 Tg CH₄ yr^?1 (ranging from 5.20 to 11.36 Tg CH₄ yr^?1) derived from rice paddies, 2.69 Tg CH₄ yr^?1 (ranging from 2.46 to 3.20 Tg CH₄ yr^?1) from natural wetlands, and 0.46 Tg CH₄ yr^?1 (ranging from 0.33 to 0.59 Tg CH₄ yr^?1) from lakes (including reservoirs and ponds). Plentiful water and warm conditions, as well as its large rice paddy area make rice paddies in southeastern China the greatest overall source of CH₄, accounting for approximately 55% of total paddy emissions. Natural wetland estimates were slightly higher than the other estimates owing to the higher CH₄ emissions recorded within Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau peatlands. Total CH₄ emissions from lakes were estimated for the first time by this study, with three quarters from the littoral zone and one quarter from lake surfaces. Rice paddies, natural wetlands, and lakes are not constant sources of CH₄, but decreasing ones influenced by anthropogenic activity and climate change. A new progress‐based model used in conjunction with more observations through model‐data fusion approach could help obtain better estimates and insights with regard to CH₄ emissions deriving from wetlands and lakes in China.