首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
对间种牧草杂交杏李园节肢动物群落结构与组成的系统定位观察与分析表明:杂交杏李园害虫种类有蚜虫类、叶螨类、食心虫类、介壳虫类、吮吸类、食叶类等,危害最为严重的是蚜虫类、叶螨类和食心虫类,这三种害虫的数量直接影响果实的产量。蓄草果园的天敌种类主要有蜘蛛类、瓢虫类和草蛉类,这三类天敌对主要害虫具有一定的控制作用,而且对维持果园害虫及其天敌之间平衡起着重要作用。对各功能类群的数量结构、生态优势度和多样性分析表明,间种牧草果园节肢动物群落结构比较稳定,各种群落指标相对平衡,天敌自然控害效果比较明显。分析认为果园有害生物综合治理应坚持大量利用自然天敌为主的生态控制的途径,不断优化果园生物群落结构、提高群落多样性和均匀度,减少群落生态优势度,增强群落自身调节控害能力,辅助使用农药,逐步达到生态控制果园有害生物的目的。  相似文献   

2.
于毅  严毓骅 《昆虫学报》1998,41(-1):82-90
1992-1995年对四个不同类型苹果园进行了系统调查,结果表明引入夏至草、泥胡菜等有益杂草并与树行间种植的紫花苜蓿搭配的生草园,捕食性天敌发生量大,种群稳定,发生高峰期较免耕园、清耕园提前7d左右;害虫发生量低,种群数量变化平稳,无突增现象,生草园在未施用任何杀虫、杀螨剂的情况下,树冠上蚜虫、叶螨和潜叶蛾的平均虫口密度均低于免耕园、清耕稀植园和密植园。生草园寄生性天敌的数量亦明显增加,金纹细蛾的寄生率高达62.7%,分别是免耕园、清耕稀植和密植园的1.34倍、16.9倍和17.9倍。果园植被多样化可使地面植被上的天敌数量逐年成倍提高,生草第3年捕食性天敌的数量是生草当年的12.5倍,树冠上天敌量亦明显增加,益害比大大提高,生草第2年树冠上最大蝽螨比为1∶14.4,与原先油菜与紫花苜蓿搭配生草5年的效果相近。除当年生草果园(1992年)早期施用1次杀螨剂—螨克外,1993、1994年均未施用任何杀虫、杀螨剂,通过天敌的自然控制作用,有效地控制果树害螨、蚜虫和金纹细蛾等次生性害虫的为害。  相似文献   

3.
生态控制茶园内害虫、天敌种类及数量的季节变化规律   总被引:16,自引:4,他引:12  
邓欣  谭济才 《生态学报》2002,22(7):1166-1172
对衡山生态控制茶园内害虫,天敌种类及数量季节变化的系统调查与排序分析表明,生态控制茶园由于生态环境优良,长期不使用化学农药,使得害虫,天敌种类多,数量少,群落间处于较好的平衡状态,群落的季节变化明显受到气候条件、茶树生育期和茶园采摘的影响,害虫、天敌的年消长规律与茶树的生长规律基本相同,即每年的11月份至翌年的3月份为茶树,害虫与天敌的越冬期;5至9月份为活动高峰期,茶树旺盛生长,害虫,天敌大量繁衍活动;4和10月份是过渡期,茶树,害虫与天敌均由越冬转入活动或由活动转入越冬,体现了天敌-害虫-茶树之间的追随与平衡状态,根据各个时期群落的特点可以采取相应的综合治理措施,因此,改善茶园生态环境,加强茶园管理,减少化学农药的使用是茶园害虫生态控制的基础和保护。  相似文献   

4.
大豆田节肢动物群落优势种群时间生态位及营养关系分析   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
【目的】阐明大豆田节肢动物群落时间生态位及营养关系,为大豆害虫生态调控手段的实施提供坚实的理论依据。【方法】以大豆田节肢动物群落为研究对象,通过两年的田间系统调查分析。【结果】统计得到种类220余种,物种可分为天敌、害虫和中性昆虫3个类群,以天敌物种丰富度最高;害虫中以烟蓟马Thrips tabaci(0.36902)和大豆蚜Aphis glycines(0.13122)优势度最高,且有着较高的生态位重叠指数(0.8163),蚜小蜂Aphytis sp.和大草蛉Chrysopa septempunctata对害虫的时间生态位重叠指数很高,其他天敌如异色瓢虫Harmonia axyridis、龟纹瓢虫Propylaea japonica、黑带食蚜蝇Zyistrophe balteata和黑食蚜盲蝽Deraeocoris punctulatus等对害虫的重叠指数居中;大豆田中各类群构成错综复杂的食物网结构。【结论】综合考虑天敌的种群数量,确定捕食性天敌是控制害虫种群数量的有效天敌。研究可知不能单纯从时间生态位的重叠指数的高低来判断天敌的控制能力。  相似文献   

5.
桃园主要害虫、天敌种群动态及其群落结构的研究   总被引:11,自引:1,他引:10  
系统研究了3月中旬~10月上旬桃园主要害虫、天敌的种群动态和昆虫群落的相对多度、丰富度、生态优势度、多样性指数、均匀度等群落特征指数的变动,分析了影响昆虫群落多样性的主要因素.  相似文献   

6.
播种时间对棉田害虫和天敌种群的影响   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1       下载免费PDF全文
通过对3种不同时间播种的棉田内害虫、天敌系统调查,分析和比较了播种时间对棉田害虫、天敌种群和群落的影响。结果表明,播种期推后,可减轻或避免第二代棉铃虫的为害,加重第三代和第四代棉铃虫的为害;但不同播种日期对不同时期的棉蚜影响不同,苗蚜以迟播棉田内种群数量最高,伏蚜则以夏播棉田内种群数量最高。播种期的推后,不利于棉田捕食性瓢虫、蝽类、蜘蛛和寄生性天敌种群增长。棉田害虫和天敌群落多样性指数也随播种期的推后而下降.因此.应针对不同时间播种的棉田开展相应的害虫生态管理。  相似文献   

7.
在豆田群落中,常见的天敌昆虫及有益生物为12科13种,它们对寄主均有很强的选择性.小花蝽是大豆蚜的主要天敌,系优势种,其次是龟纹瓢虫.大青叶蝉的主要天敌是蜘蛛类,三突花蛛和草间小黑蛛为优势种.在长期不施用农药的环境下,天敌自然种群对控制害虫发生危害的作用明显.经数学分析,建立了12个数学模型,进一步揭示了两种刺吸类害虫与其天敌之间的关系;天敌种群消长、害虫种群消长与时间变动的关系.尤其通过对豆田群落生物的多样性、稳定性动态分析,表明豆田群落在8月9日至8月29日多样性指数和稳定性指数最大;同时亦表明豆田群落的多样性指数愈高,群落的稳定性愈强.  相似文献   

8.
龙眼园害虫群落结构与动态研究   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
研究结果表明,龙眼害虫群落包括8目38科62种,其中为害较严重的有10多种。荔枝蝽蟓、龙眼角颊木虱、荔枝蒂蛀虫、龙眼亥麦蛾、荔枝尖细蛾和三角新小卷蛾为害尤为严重,是龙眼害虫的关键物种。这些害虫直接影响龙眼的产量和质量,是生产上防治的重点。龙眼害虫群落的生物多样性指数全年变动范围为0.0919—2.2938,均匀度指数全年变动范围为0.0837—0.8273。总体上分析,龙眼害虫群落优势种的优势地位明显,生态优势度大,在药剂防治实践中,应该注意保护果园昆虫天敌和蜘蛛类等有益生物,保护果园生物多样性,达到害虫可持续控制目的。  相似文献   

9.
美国杂交杏李花果期节肢动物的生态位分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
美国杏李园害虫中绣线菊蚜与山楂叶螨的生态位宽度较宽,占据空间较大,为害虫优势种群,在空间维度上害虫之间存在较大竞争;大草蛉在各期的生态位宽度最大,说明大草蛉是重要的优势天敌,且天敌与主要害虫在空间上相遇机率较大;天敌之间生态位重叠指数较高,表明主要天敌之间存在明显的相互竞争关系;美国杏李园天敌对主要害虫在时间维度上有较强的追随效应和控制作用.主要天敌的数量与主要害虫绣线菊蚜种群数量追随关联度顺序为草蛉类>龟纹瓢虫>蜘蛛类>异色瓢虫>其它瓢虫类>食蚜蝇类>七星瓢虫>多异瓢虫.草蛉类和龟纹瓢虫与绣线菊蚜的模糊贴近度最高,说明这两种天敌与绣线菊蚜的同域效应高,对绣线菊蚜有较强的追随作用,抑制着绣线菊蚜种群数量的增长.  相似文献   

10.
张旭珠  张鑫  宋潇  宇振荣  刘云慧 《生态学报》2018,38(23):8442-8454
通过管理半自然生境提高农田中天敌多样性及农田害虫的生物控制效率是当前生态农业研究的基本问题之一。为探讨不同类型半自然植被边界带对相邻麦田地表天敌的发生以及对小麦蚜虫生物控制潜力的影响,在北京顺义区赵全营镇采用陷阱法调查了不同类型植被边界带(人工林地、人工种植草带、自然演替草带)相邻的小麦田中,距离边界0,15 m和30 m处步甲和蜘蛛两类重要地表天敌的多度分布及小麦田蚜虫发生情况,同时分析了边界带植被群落结构对步甲和蜘蛛群落分布的影响。结果表明:人工林地相邻的小麦田中维持了显著较高的步甲、蜘蛛和蚜虫发生密度;不同类型植被边界带相邻小麦田中步甲和蜘蛛群落组成显著不同,植被边界带宽度以及乔木层盖度是影响相邻麦田步甲和蜘蛛群落分布的主要因子;距离植被边界带不同取样界面处,不同迁移方向的步甲和蜘蛛的活动密度无显著性差异;与林地相邻的麦田中,蜘蛛活动密度从农田边界向农田内部处依次降低,与人工种植草带以及自然演替草带相邻的麦田中,农田边界处蜘蛛的活动密度显著高于农田内部。研究显示,半自然植被边界带与麦田交界处维持了较高的蜘蛛活动密度,并具有向农田内部扩散的趋势,然而,并非高天敌密度就意味着低害虫发生率,深入研究天敌群落与害虫发生关系及其影响因素是未来天敌保护和害虫生物防治的重要方面。同时,因为不同类型植被边界带维持的天敌群落具有高度异质性,未来的研究需要充分考虑不同类型植被边界带对天敌维持的作用,以及不同类型生境界面地表天敌的活动规律。  相似文献   

11.
梨园芳香植物间作区节肢动物群落时序格局   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
以沙地梨园间作罗勒、孔雀草、薄荷为处理,自然生草和清耕区为对照,应用最优分割法和模糊聚类法,探讨梨园节肢动物群落、害虫亚群落和天敌亚群落发生的时序格局特征及其相互联系。结果表明:总群落、害虫亚群落以及其优势种个体数时序变化趋势呈偏态分布,而天敌亚群落以及其优势种个体数的呈正态分布,高峰期出现在6月末至7月中旬,比总群落和害虫亚群落个体数发生高峰晚。在梨树年生长周期的主要时段中,芳香植物间作区较自然生草区、清耕区害虫亚群落的发生数量(4月中至8月底)少;而天敌亚群落发生数量(4月底至6月底)多。梨园各间作区节肢动物总群落和害虫亚群落时序最优格局均可划分5个时段:发展初期、发展期、稳定期、波动期和衰退期;天敌亚群落分为3个时段:发展期、稳定期、衰退期。但处理间在发生时段的时间范围、发生数量及组成特征上存在复杂的差异。梨园节肢动物总群落、害虫亚群落、天敌亚群落时序聚类结果不同,预示着处理间节肢动物总群落、害虫亚群落和天敌亚群落在各发生时段上的个体组成、物种丰富度、群落多样性指数、优势度和均匀度指数存在着差异。  相似文献   

12.
Ecological inefficiency of conventional IPM programs for apple orchard protection in the North Caucasus results from arbitrary use of compounds producing opposite ecological effects, i.e., broad-spectrum chemical insecticides after environment-friendly selective ones, which destroys the apple orchard agroecosystem. The investigation was aimed at developing an effective and ecologically acceptable program with alternation of environment-friendly compounds which act along the same vector to preserve the populations of natural enemies of the pests and thus to stabilize the apple orchard agroecosystem, i.e., create an ecological type of orchard. In this kind of orchards, broad-spectrum chemical pesticides are prohibited whereas selective biological compounds (including synthetic ones) and methods are welcomed. The test runs of the resulting pest and enemy management (PEM) programs based both on bioregulators (Insegar, Match, Dimilin) and bio-insecticides (Phytoverm™, Lepidocid™, etc.) in 2007 and 2009 demonstrated their high efficiency: the apple fruit damage by codling moth was 1.2% and 0.3%, respectively. The test of sticky bands fixed on apple tree trunks to prevent ants from getting to the crowns showed a significant increase in the abundance of predaceous bugs which sharply reduced the green apple aphid population.  相似文献   

13.
红富士苹果园害虫与天敌群落的定量分析   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
应用多元分析方法对烟台市牟平区红富士苹果园害虫与天敌群落进行了定量分析,采用最优分割法将苹果害虫与天敌群落的时序结构分为5个阶段,并分析了各个时序段害虫及天敌的发生特点.对害虫亚群落、捕食性天敌亚群落和寄生性天敌亚群落进行了主成分和因子分析,明确了不同时期起主要作用的害虫及其天敌种类.典型相关分析表明,主要害虫及其天敌类群之间存在显著相关性,其中金纹细蛾与其寄生蜂、绣线菊蚜与其寄生蜂、山楂叶螨与其专一性捕食性天敌深点颏瓢虫和东方钝绥螨之间的相关性高.  相似文献   

14.
张文庆  张古忍  古德祥 《生态学报》2001,21(11):1927-1931
保护利用天敌是农田害虫生物防治的基本手段。短期农作物生境中的天敌亚群落周期性地呈现出群落重建、群落发展和群落瓦解3个阶段。其中的重建阶段对抑制害虫的发生和危害至关重要。天敌亚群落的重建与其种库、群落本身和作物生态系统之间的相互作用关系,是群落水平上保护利用天敌的理论基础之一。因此,可以指导自然天敌的保护和持续利用,促进短期农作物生境中的害虫生物防治。  相似文献   

15.
Apple is one of the most important fruits in China, and both yield and quality are greatly affected by insect pests. According to surveys, there are more than 200 species of natural enemies in apple orchards. Few, however, have been closely studied. Major natural enemies including parasitoids, predators and pathogens are briefly described in this review, especially focusing on two parasitoids of Trichogramma dendrolimi Matsumura and Aphelinus mali Haldeman, predatory mites and a pathogenic fungus of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin as case studies. Augmentation, one important strategy of biological control, supplements the natural control provided by the existing natural enemy community in apple orchards, and greatly increases their efficiency in controlling pests. Conservation biological control is also widely applied in four major apple-producing areas. Based on habitat manipulation, the ground cover planting system helps regulate the microclimate and enhance the biodiversity of apple orchards, effectively conserving the richness and diversity of beneficial insect species. Certain achievements have been made in the main biological control strategies including successful introduction of some exotic natural enemies such as A. mali and Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt, augmentative production and application of biological control agents such as T. dendrolimi, B. bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis, and further research in conservation of establishing adaptive ground cover planting patterns to local environment. Challenges, however, still exist. Biological control of insect pests in apple orchards is an important part of integrated pest management programs, requiring more research and application in China.  相似文献   

16.
The relationship between crop richness and predator-prey interactions as they relate to pest-natural enemy systems is a very important topic in ecology and greatly affects biological control services. The effects of crop arrangement on predator-prey interactions have received much attention as the basis for pest population management. To explore the internal mechanisms and factors driving the relationship between crop richness and pest population management, we designed an experimental model system of a microlandscape that included 50 plots and five treatments. Each treatment had 10 repetitions in each year from 2007 to 2010. The results showed that the biomass of pests and their natural enemies increased with increasing crop biomass and decreased with decreasing crop biomass; however, the effects of plant biomass on the pest and natural enemy biomass were not significant. The relationship between adjacent trophic levels was significant (such as pests and their natural enemies or crops and pests), whereas non-adjacent trophic levels (crops and natural enemies) did not significantly interact with each other. The ratio of natural enemy/pest biomass was the highest in the areas of four crop species that had the best biological control service. Having either low or high crop species richness did not enhance the pest population management service and lead to loss of biological control. Although the resource concentration hypothesis was not well supported by our results, high crop species richness could suppress the pest population, indicating that crop species richness could enhance biological control services. These results could be applied in habitat management aimed at biological control, provide the theoretical basis for agricultural landscape design, and also suggest new methods for integrated pest management.  相似文献   

17.
Understanding the full diet of natural enemies is necessary for evaluating their role as biocontrol agents, because many enemy species do not only feed on pests but also on other natural enemies. Such intraguild predation can compromise pest control if the consumed enemies are actually better for pest control than their predators. In this study, we used gut metabarcoding to quantify diets of all common arachnid species in Swedish and Spanish apple orchards. For this purpose, we designed new primers that reduce amplification of arachnid predators while retaining high amplification of all prey groups. Results suggest that most arachnids consume a large range of putative pest species on apple but also a high proportion of other natural enemies, where the latter constitute almost a third of all prey sequences. Intraguild predation also varied between regions, with a larger content of heteropteran bugs in arachnid guts from Spanish orchards, but not between orchard types. There was also a tendency for cursorial spiders to have more intraguild prey in the gut than web spiders. Two groups that may be overlooked as important biocontrol agents in apple orchards seem to be theridiid web spiders and opilionids, where the latter had several small-bodied pest species in the gut. These results thus provide important guidance for what arachnid groups should be targets of management actions, even though additional information is needed to quantify all direct and indirect interactions occurring in the complex arthropod food webs in fruit orchards.  相似文献   

18.
麦套夏播转Bt基因棉R93-6对昆虫群落的影响   总被引:42,自引:6,他引:36  
以转Bt(Bacillusthuringiensis)基因棉品系R93-6为试验材料,以中棉所16号为对照,研究了在麦套夏播条件下转基因棉对昆虫群落的影响。结果表明,转基因棉田昆虫群落、害虫和天敌亚群落的多样性指数和均匀度指数均低于常规棉田,而优势集中性则高于常规棉田,所以转基因棉田昆虫群落、害虫和天敌亚群落的稳定性不如常规棉田,某种害虫大发生的可能性较大。对季节性变化格局的研究表明,转基因棉田昆虫群落可以划分为前期(6月初至7月下旬)、中期(7月底至8月底)和后期(9月份以后)三个发展阶段,根据不同阶段害虫和天敌发生的特点, 提出了害虫综合治理的策略。即前期害虫的防治应以生物生态调控为主;中期以化学防治为主,以生物生态调控为辅,协调好生物防治和化学防治的矛盾;后期应以生物生态调控为主,并加强农业防治。  相似文献   

19.
苏丽  戈峰  刘向辉 《昆虫学报》2002,45(6):777-784
分析比较了化学防治对8种不同类型棉田害虫、捕食性天敌群落多样性的影响。研究结果表明,化学防治对棉田害虫、捕食性天敌群落的多样性指数、均匀性指数、丰富度及个体数的变化有较大的影响,尤其对捕食性天敌群落的影响显著。但这种作用依不同类型棉田或棉花不同生育阶段而异:化学防治对套作棉田害虫、捕食性天敌群落的影响较小,而对单作棉田和豆间棉棉田害虫、捕食性天敌群落的影响较大;晚播棉田害虫与捕食性天敌群落较早播棉田受化学防治的影响更大;化学防治对免耕棉田害虫、天敌群落的影响更大,非免耕棉田害虫、捕食性天敌群落受其干扰较小;春套棉边害虫、捕食性天敌群落与其它棉田类型相比,受化学防治的影响较少;棉花害虫在棉花生育前期对化学防治较棉花生育后期敏感,而捕食性天敌在棉花整个生育期均对化学防治敏感。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号