Sporophyte Formation and Life Cycle Completion in Moss Requires Heterotrimeric G-Proteins

In this study, we report the functional characterization of heterotrimeric G-proteins from a nonvascular plant, the moss Physcomitrella patens. In plants, G-proteins have been characterized from only a few angiosperms to date, where their involvement has been shown during regulation of multiple signaling and developmental pathways affecting overall plant fitness. In addition to its unparalleled evolutionary position in the plant lineages, the P. patens genome also codes for a unique assortment of G-protein components, which includes two copies of Gβ and Gγ genes, but no canonical Gα. Instead, a single gene encoding an extra-large Gα (XLG) protein exists in the P. patens genome. Here, we demonstrate that in P. patens the canonical Gα is biochemically and functionally replaced by an XLG protein, which works in the same genetic pathway as one of the Gβ proteins to control its development. Furthermore, the specific G-protein subunits in P. patens are essential for its life cycle completion. Deletion of the genomic locus of PpXLG or PpGβ2 results in smaller, slower growing gametophores. Normal reproductive structures develop on these gametophores, but they are unable to form any sporophyte, the only diploid stage in the moss life cycle. Finally, the mutant phenotypes of ΔPpXLG and ΔPpGβ2 can be complemented by the homologous genes from Arabidopsis, AtXLG2 and AtAGB1, respectively, suggesting an overall conservation of their function throughout the plant evolution.In all known eukaryotes, cellular signaling involves heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins), which consist of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits (Cabrera-Vera et al., 2003). According to the established paradigm, when Gα is GDP-bound, it forms a trimeric complex with the Gβγ dimer and remains associated with a G-protein coupled receptor. Signal perception by the receptor facilitates GDP to GTP exchange on Gα. GTP-Gα dissociates from the Gβγ dimer, and both these entities can transduce the signal by interacting with different effectors. The duration of the active state is determined by the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα, which hydrolyzes bound GTP into GDP and inorganic phosphate (Pi), followed by the reassociation of the inactive, trimeric complex (Siderovski and Willard, 2005).In plants, G-protein signaling has been studied in only a few angiosperms to date at the functional level, although the proteins exist in the entire plant lineage (Hackenberg and Pandey, 2014; Urano and Jones, 2014; Hackenberg et al., 2016). Interestingly, while the overall biochemistry of the individual G-protein components and the interactions between them are conserved between plant and metazoan systems, deviations from the established norm are also obvious. For example, the repertoire of canonical G-proteins is significantly limited in plants; the human genome codes for 23 Gα, 5 Gβ, and 12 Gγ proteins, whereas most plant genomes, including those of basal plants, typically encode 1 canonical Gα, 1 Gβ, and three to five Gγ proteins (Urano and Jones, 2014). The only exceptions are some polyploid species, such as soybean, which have retained most of the duplicated G-protein genes (Bisht et al., 2011; Choudhury et al., 2011). Moreover, even in plants that possess only a single canonical Gα and Gβ protein, for example Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice, the phenotypes of plants lacking either one or both proteins are relatively subtle. The mutant plants exhibit multiple developmental and signaling defects but are able to complete the life cycle without any major consequences. These observations have questioned the significance of G-protein mediated signaling pathways in plants.Interestingly, plants also possess certain unique variants of the classical G-protein components such as the type III Cys-rich Gγ proteins and extra-large GTP-binding (XLG) proteins, which add to the diversity and expanse of the G-protein signaling networks (Roy Choudhury et al., 2011; Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). The XLG proteins are almost twice the size of typical Gα proteins, with the C-terminal region that codes for Gα-like domain and an extended N-terminal region without any distinctive features. Plant XLGs are encoded by entirely independent genes and therefore are different from the mammalian extra-long versions of Gα proteins such as XLαs and XXLαs, which are expressed due to the use of alternate exons (Abramowitz et al., 2004). Three to five copies of XLG proteins are present in the genome of most angiosperms. At the functional level, the XLG proteins have been characterized only from Arabidopsis, to date, where recent studies suggest that the proteins compete with canonical Gα for binding with the Gβγ dimers and may form functional trimeric complexes (Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). The XLG and Gβγ mutants of Arabidopsis seem to function in the same pathways during the regulation of a subset of plant responses, for example primary root length and its regulation by abscisic acid (ABA); the root waving and skewing responses; sensitivity to Glc, salt, and tunicamycin; and sensitivity to certain bacterial and fungal pathogens (Ding et al., 2008; Pandey et al., 2008; Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). However, many of the phenotypes of Arabidopsis Gα and Gβγ mutants are also distinct from that of the xlg triple mutants. For example, compared to the wild-type plants, the canonical G-protein mutants exhibit altered response to gibberellic acid, brassinosteroids, and auxin and show changes in leaf shape, branching, flowering time, and stomatal densities (Ullah et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2004; Pandey et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008; Nilson and Assmann, 2010). The xlg triple mutants behave similarly to wild-type plants in all these aspects of development and signaling. Moreover, whether the XLG proteins are authentic GTP-binding and -hydrolyzing proteins and the extent to which they directly participate in G-protein-mediated signaling pathways remains confounding (Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). Even in plants with a limited number of G-protein subunits such as Arabidopsis, one Gα and three XLGs potentially compete for a single Gβ protein, and the analysis of null mutants is not straightforward, that is, it is not possible to delineate whether the phenotypes seen in the Gα null mutants are truly due to the lack of Gα and/or because of an altered stoichiometry or availability of Gβ for the XLG proteins.As a bryophyte, Physcomitrella patens occupies a unique position in the evolutionary history of plants. It lacks vasculature but exhibits alteration between generations, which is dominated by a gametophytic (haploid) phase and a short sporophytic (diploid) phase (Cove et al., 2009). Many of the pathways related to hormone signaling, stress responses, and development are conserved between angiosperms and P. patens (Cove et al., 2009; Sun, 2011; Komatsu et al., 2013; Yasumura et al., 2015). It is also an intriguing example in the context of the G-protein signaling, because its fully sequenced genome does not encode a canonical Gα gene, although genes coding for the Gβ and Gγ proteins exist. A single gene for a potential XLG homolog also exists in the P. patens genome. This unique assortment of proteins predicts several alternative scenarios for G-protein signaling in P. patens. For example, the P. patens Gβγ proteins might be nonfunctional due to the loss of canonical Gα and are left in the genome as evolutionary artifacts. Alternatively, the Gβγ proteins of P. patens might maintain functionality regardless of the existence of a canonical Gα protein in pathways not regulated via classic G-protein signaling modes. Finally, a more likely scenario could be that the potential XLG protein can substitute for the Gα function in P. patens.To explore these possibilities and understand better the conserved and unique mechanisms of G-protein signaling pathways in plants and their significance, we examined the role of G-protein subunits in P. patens. We provide unambiguous evidence for the genetic coupling of XLG and Gβ proteins in controlling P. patens development. In contrast to all other plant species analyzed to date, where G-proteins are not essential for growth and survival, the XLG or one of the Gβ proteins is required for the sporophyte formation and life cycle completion in P. patens. Furthermore, one of the Arabidopsis XLG proteins, XLG2, and the canonical Gβ protein AGB1 can functionally complement the P. patens mutant phenotypes. These data provide new insights in the evolutionary breadth and the spectrum of signaling pathways regulated by G-proteins in plants.     

Phosphorylation-Dependent Regulation of G-Protein Cycle during Nodule Formation in Soybean

Signaling pathways mediated by heterotrimeric G-protein complexes comprising Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits and their regulatory RGS (Regulator of G-protein Signaling) protein are conserved in all eukaryotes. We have shown that the specific Gβ and Gγ proteins of a soybean (Glycine max) heterotrimeric G-protein complex are involved in regulation of nodulation. We now demonstrate the role of Nod factor receptor 1 (NFR1)-mediated phosphorylation in regulation of the G-protein cycle during nodulation in soybean. We also show that during nodulation, the G-protein cycle is regulated by the activity of RGS proteins. Lower or higher expression of RGS proteins results in fewer or more nodules, respectively. NFR1 interacts with RGS proteins and phosphorylates them. Analysis of phosphorylated RGS protein identifies specific amino acids that, when phosphorylated, result in significantly higher GTPase accelerating activity. These data point to phosphorylation-based regulation of G-protein signaling during nodule development. We propose that active NFR1 receptors phosphorylate and activate RGS proteins, which help maintain the Gα proteins in their inactive, trimeric conformation, resulting in successful nodule development. Alternatively, RGS proteins might also have a direct role in regulating nodulation because overexpression of their phospho-mimic version leads to partial restoration of nodule formation in nod49 mutants.     

The β Subunit of the Heterotrimeric G Protein Triggers the Kluyveromyces lactis Pheromone Response Pathway in the Absence of the γ Subunit

The Kluyveromyces lactis heterotrimeric G protein is a canonical Gαβγ complex; however, in contrast to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where the Gγ subunit is essential for mating, disruption of the KlGγ gene yielded cells with almost intact mating capacity. Expression of a nonfarnesylated Gγ, which behaves as a dominant-negative in S. cerevisiae, did not affect mating in wild-type and ΔGγ cells of K. lactis. In contrast to the moderate sterility shown by the single ΔKlGα, the double ΔKlGα ΔKlGγ mutant displayed full sterility. A partial sterile phenotype of the ΔKlGγ mutant was obtained in conditions where the KlGβ subunit interacted defectively with the Gα subunit. The addition of a CCAAX motif to the C-end of KlGβ, partially suppressed the lack of both KlGα and KlGγ subunits. In cells lacking KlGγ, the KlGβ subunit cofractionated with KlGα in the plasma membrane, but in the ΔKlGα ΔKlGγ strain was located in the cytosol. When the KlGβ-KlGα interaction was affected in the ΔKlGγ mutant, most KlGβ fractionated to the cytosol. In contrast to the generic model of G-protein function, the Gβ subunit of K. lactis has the capacity to attach to the membrane and to activate mating effectors in absence of the Gγ subunit.     

Regulation of the AGS3·Gαi Signaling Complex by a Seven-transmembrane Span Receptor

G-protein signaling modulators (GPSM) play diverse functional roles through their interaction with G-protein subunits. AGS3 (GPSM1) contains four G-protein regulatory motifs (GPR) that directly bind Gα_i free of Gβγ providing an unusual scaffold for the “G-switch” and signaling complexes, but the mechanism by which signals track into this scaffold are not well understood. We report the regulation of the AGS3·Gα_i signaling module by a cell surface, seven-transmembrane receptor. AGS3 and Gα_i1 tagged with Renilla luciferase or yellow fluorescent protein expressed in mammalian cells exhibited saturable, specific bioluminescence resonance energy transfer indicating complex formation in the cell. Activation of α₂-adrenergic receptors or μ-opioid receptors reduced AGS3-RLuc·Gα_i1-YFP energy transfer by over 30%. The agonist-mediated effects were inhibited by pertussis toxin and co-expression of RGS4, but were not altered by Gβγ sequestration with the carboxyl terminus of GRK2. Gα_i-dependent and agonist-sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer was also observed between AGS3 and cell-surface receptors typically coupled to Gα_i and/or Gα_o indicating that AGS3 is part of a larger signaling complex. Upon receptor activation, AGS3 reversibly dissociates from this complex at the cell cortex. Receptor coupling to both Gαβγ and GPR-Gα_i offer additional flexibility for systems to respond and adapt to challenges and orchestrate complex behaviors.     

Genetic and Physical Interactions between Gα Subunits and Components of the Gβγ Dimer of Heterotrimeric G Proteins in Neurospora crassa

Heterotrimeric G proteins are critical regulators of growth and asexual and sexual development in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Three Gα subunits (GNA-1, GNA-2, and GNA-3), one Gβ subunit (GNB-1), and one Gγ subunit (GNG-1) have been functionally characterized, but genetic epistasis relationships between Gβ and Gα subunit genes have not been determined. Physical association between GNB-1 and FLAG-tagged GNG-1 has been previously demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation, but knowledge of the Gα binding partners for the Gβγ dimer is currently lacking. In this study, the three N. crassa Gα subunits are analyzed for genetic epistasis with gnb-1 and for physical interaction with the Gβγ dimer. We created double mutants lacking one Gα gene and gnb-1 and introduced constitutively active, GTPase-deficient alleles for each Gα gene into the Δgnb-1 background. Genetic analysis revealed that gna-3 is epistatic to gnb-1 with regard to negative control of submerged conidiation. gnb-1 is epistatic to gna-2 and gna-3 for aerial hyphal height, while gnb-1 appears to act upstream of gna-1 and gna-2 during aerial conidiation. None of the activated Gα alleles restored female fertility to Δgnb-1 mutants, and the gna-3^Q208L allele inhibited formation of female reproductive structures, consistent with a need for Gα proteins to cycle through the inactive GDP-bound form for these processes. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments using extracts from the gng-1-FLAG strain demonstrated that the three Gα proteins interact with the Gβγ dimer. The finding that the Gβγ dimer interacts with all three Gα proteins is supported by epistasis between gnb-1 and gna-1, gna-2, and gna-3 for at least one function.     

Arabidopsis Heterotrimeric G-Proteins Play a Critical Role in Host and Nonhost Resistance against Pseudomonas syringae Pathogens

Heterotrimeric G-proteins have been proposed to be involved in many aspects of plant disease resistance but their precise role in mediating nonhost disease resistance is not well understood. We evaluated the roles of specific subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins using knock-out mutants of Arabidopsis Gα, Gβ and Gγ subunits in response to host and nonhost Pseudomonas pathogens. Plants lacking functional Gα, Gβ and Gγ1Gγ2 proteins displayed enhanced bacterial growth and disease susceptibility in response to host and nonhost pathogens. Mutations of single Gγ subunits Gγ1, Gγ2 and Gγ3 did not alter bacterial disease resistance. Some specificity of subunit usage was observed when comparing host pathogen versus nonhost pathogen. Overexpression of both Gα and Gβ led to reduced bacterial multiplication of nonhost pathogen P. syringae pv. tabaci whereas overexpression of Gβ, but not of Gα, resulted in reduced bacterial growth of host pathogen P. syringae pv. maculicola, compared to wild-type Col-0. Moreover, the regulation of stomatal aperture by bacterial pathogens was altered in Gα and Gβ mutants but not in any of the single or double Gγ mutants. Taken together, these data substantiate the critical role of heterotrimeric G-proteins in plant innate immunity and stomatal modulation in response to P. syringae.     

GPC-1, a G Protein γ-Subunit, Regulates Olfactory Adaptation in Caenorhabditis elegans

Caenorhabditis elegans genome carries two Gγ genes, gpc-1 and gpc-2, and two Gβ genes, gpb-1 and gpb-2. Of these, gpc-2 and gpb-1 are expressed ubiquitously and are essential for viability. Through a genetic screen, we identified gpc-1 as essential for olfactory adaptation. While wild-type animals show decreased chemotaxis to the odorant benzaldehyde after a short preexposure to the odorant, gpc-1 mutants are still attracted to the odorant after the same preexposure. Cell-specific rescue experiments show that gpc-1 acts in the AWC olfactory neurons. Coexpression of GPC-1 and GPB-1, but not GPB-2, caused enhanced adaptation, indicating that GPC-1 may act with GPB-1. On the other hand, knock down of gpc-2 by cell-targeted RNAi caused reduced chemotaxis to the odorant in unadapted animals, indicating that GPC-2 mainly act for olfactory sensation and the two Gγ's have differential functions. Nonetheless, overexpression of gpc-2 in AWC neurons rescued the adaptation defects of gpc-1 mutants, suggesting partially overlapping functions of the two Gγ's. We further tested genetic interaction of gpc-1 with several other genes involved in olfactory adaptation. Our analyses place goa-1 Goα and let-60 Ras in parallel to gpc-1. In contrast, a gain-of-function mutation in egl-30 Gqα was epistatic to gpc-1, suggesting the possibility that gpc-1 Gγ may act upstream of egl-30 Gqα.     

Kir2.4 Surface Expression and Basal Current Are Affected by Heterotrimeric G-Proteins

Kir2.4, a strongly rectifying potassium channel that is localized to neurons and is especially abundant in retina, was fished with yeast two-hybrid screen using a constitutively active Gα_o1. Here, we wished to determine whether and how Gα_o affects this channel. Using transfected HEK 293 cells and retinal tissue, we showed that Kir2.4 interacts with Gα_o, and this interaction is stronger with the GDP-bound form of Gα_o. Using two-electrode voltage clamp, we recorded from oocytes that were injected with Kir2.4 mRNA and a combination of G-protein subunit mRNAs. We found that the wild type and the inactive mutant of Gα_o reduce the Kir2.4 basal current, whereas the active mutant has little effect. Other pertussis-sensitive Gα subunits also reduce this current, whereas Gα_s increases it. Gβγ increases the current, whereas m-phosducin, which binds Gβγ without affecting the state of Gα, reduces it. We then tested the effect of G-protein subunits on the surface expression of the channel fused to cerulean by imaging the plasma membranes of the oocytes. We found that the surface expression is affected, with effects paralleling those seen with the basal current. This suggests that the observed effects on the current are mainly indirect and are due to surface expression. Similar results were obtained in transfected HEK cells. Moreover, we show that in retinal ON bipolar cells lacking Gβ3, localization of Kir2.4 in the dendritic tips is reduced. We conclude that Gβγ targets Kir2.4 to the plasma membrane, and Gα_o slows this down by binding Gβγ.     

Translocation of Activator of G-protein Signaling 3 to the Golgi Apparatus in Response to Receptor Activation and Its Effect on the trans-Golgi Network

Group II activators of G-protein signaling play diverse functional roles through their interaction with Gα_i, Gα_t, and Gα_o via a G-protein regulatory (GPR) motif that serves as a docking site for Gα-GDP. We recently reported the regulation of the AGS3-Gα_i signaling module by a cell surface, seven-transmembrane receptor. Upon receptor activation, AGS3 reversibly dissociates from the cell cortex, suggesting that it may function as a signal transducer with downstream signaling implications, and this question is addressed in the current report. In HEK-293 and COS-7 cells expressing the α_2A/D-AR and Gα_i3, receptor activation resulted in the translocation of endogenous AGS3 and AGS3-GFP from the cell cortex to a juxtanuclear region, where it co-localized with markers of the Golgi apparatus (GA). The agonist-induced translocation of AGS3 was reversed by the α₂-AR antagonist rauwolscine. The TPR domain of AGS3 was required for agonist-induced translocation of AGS3 from the cell cortex to the GA, and the translocation was blocked by pertussis toxin pretreatment or by the phospholipase Cβ inhibitor {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"U73122","term_id":"4098075","term_text":"U73122"}}U73122. Agonist-induced translocation of AGS3 to the GA altered the functional organization and protein sorting at the trans-Golgi network. The regulated movement of AGS3 between the cell cortex and the GA offers unexpected mechanisms for modulating protein secretion and/or endosome recycling events at the trans-Golgi network.     

A New Generation of FRET Sensors for Robust Measurement of Gαi1, Gαi2 and Gαi3 Activation Kinetics in Single Cells

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) can activate a heterotrimeric G-protein complex with subsecond kinetics. Genetically encoded biosensors based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) are ideally suited for the study of such fast signaling events in single living cells. Here we report on the construction and characterization of three FRET biosensors for the measurement of Gα_i1, Gα_i2 and Gα_i3 activation. To enable quantitative long-term imaging of FRET biosensors with high dynamic range, fluorescent proteins with enhanced photophysical properties are required. Therefore, we use the currently brightest and most photostable CFP variant, mTurquoise2, as donor fused to Gα_i subunit, and cp173Venus fused to the Gγ₂ subunit as acceptor. The Gα_i FRET biosensors constructs are expressed together with Gβ₁ from a single plasmid, providing preferred relative expression levels with reduced variation in mammalian cells. The Gα_i FRET sensors showed a robust response to activation of endogenous or over-expressed alpha-2A-adrenergic receptors, which was inhibited by pertussis toxin. Moreover, we observed activation of the Gα_i FRET sensor in single cells upon stimulation of several GPCRs, including the LPA₂, M₃ and BK₂ receptor. Furthermore, we show that the sensors are well suited to extract kinetic parameters from fast measurements in the millisecond time range. This new generation of FRET biosensors for Gα_i1, Gα_i2 and Gα_i3 activation will be valuable for live-cell measurements that probe Gα_i activation.     

Adenosine A2A Receptor Signaling and Golf Assembly Show a Specific Requirement for the γ7 Subtype in the Striatum

The adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR) is increasingly recognized as a novel therapeutic target in Parkinson disease. In striatopallidal neurons, the G-protein α_olf subtype is required to couple this receptor to adenylyl cyclase activation. It is now well established that the βγ dimer also performs an active role in this signal transduction process. In principal, sixty distinct βγ dimers could arise from combinatorial association of the five known β and 12 γ subunit genes. However, key questions regarding which βγ subunit combinations exist and whether they perform specific signaling roles in the context of the organism remain to be answered. To explore these questions, we used a gene targeting approach to specifically ablate the G-protein γ₇ subtype. Revealing a potentially new signaling paradigm, we show that the level of the γ₇ protein controls the hierarchial assembly of a specific G-protein α_olfβ₂γ₇ heterotrimer in the striatum. Providing a probable basis for the selectivity of receptor signaling, we further demonstrate that loss of this specific G-protein heterotrimer leads to reduced A_2AR activation of adenylyl cyclase. Finally, substantiating an important role for this signaling pathway in pyschostimulant responsiveness, we show that mice lacking the G-protein γ₇ subtype exhibit an attenuated behavioral response to caffeine. Collectively, these results further support the A_2AR G-protein α_olfβ₂γ₇ interface as a possible therapeutic target for Parkinson disease.     

Extra-Large G Proteins Expand the Repertoire of Subunits in Arabidopsis Heterotrimeric G Protein Signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins, consisting of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are a conserved signal transduction mechanism in eukaryotes. However, G protein subunit numbers in diploid plant genomes are greatly reduced as compared with animals and do not correlate with the diversity of functions and phenotypes in which heterotrimeric G proteins have been implicated. In addition to GPA1, the sole canonical Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Gα subunit, Arabidopsis has three related proteins: the extra-large GTP-binding proteins XLG1, XLG2, and XLG3. We demonstrate that the XLGs can bind Gβγ dimers (AGB1 plus a Gγ subunit: AGG1, AGG2, or AGG3) with differing specificity in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid assays. Our in silico structural analysis shows that XLG3 aligns closely to the crystal structure of GPA1, and XLG3 also competes with GPA1 for Gβγ binding in yeast. We observed interaction of the XLGs with all three Gβγ dimers at the plasma membrane in planta by bimolecular fluorescence complementation. Bioinformatic and localization studies identified and confirmed nuclear localization signals in XLG2 and XLG3 and a nuclear export signal in XLG3, which may facilitate intracellular shuttling. We found that tunicamycin, salt, and glucose hypersensitivity and increased stomatal density are agb1-specific phenotypes that are not observed in gpa1 mutants but are recapitulated in xlg mutants. Thus, XLG-Gβγ heterotrimers provide additional signaling modalities for tuning plant G protein responses and increase the repertoire of G protein heterotrimer combinations from three to 12. The potential for signal partitioning and competition between the XLGs and GPA1 is a new paradigm for plant-specific cell signaling.The classical heterotrimeric G protein consists of a GDP/GTP-binding Gα subunit with GTPase activity bound to an obligate dimer formed by Gβ and Gγ subunits. In the signaling paradigm largely elucidated from mammalian systems, the plasma membrane-associated heterotrimer contains Gα in its GDP-bound form. Upon receiving a molecular signal, typically transduced by a transmembrane protein (e.g. a G protein-coupled receptor), Gα exchanges GDP for GTP and dissociates from the Gβγ dimer. Both Gα and Gβγ interact with intracellular effectors to initiate downstream signaling cascades. The intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα restores Gα to the GDP-bound form, which binds Gβγ, thereby reconstituting the heterotrimer (McCudden et al., 2005; Oldham and Hamm, 2008).Signal transduction through a heterotrimeric G protein complex is an evolutionarily conserved eukaryotic mechanism common to metazoa and plants, although there are distinct differences in the functional intricacies between the evolutionary branches (Jones et al., 2011a, 2011b; Bradford et al., 2013). The numbers of each subunit encoded within genomes, and therefore the potential for combinatorial complexity within the heterotrimer, is one of the most striking differences between plants and animals. For example, the human genome encodes 23 Gα (encoded by 16 genes), five Gβ, and 12 Gγ subunits (Hurowitz et al., 2000; McCudden et al., 2005; Birnbaumer, 2007). The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome, however, only encodes one canonical Gα (GPA1; Ma et al., 1990), one Gβ (AGB1; Weiss et al., 1994), and three Gγ (AGG1, AGG2, and AGG3) subunits (Mason and Botella, 2000, 2001; Chakravorty et al., 2011), while the rice (Oryza sativa) genome encodes one Gα (Ishikawa et al., 1995), one Gβ (Ishikawa et al., 1996), and either four or five Gγ subunits (Kato et al., 2004; Chakravorty et al., 2011; Botella, 2012). As expected, genomes of polyploid plants have more copies due to genome duplication, with the soybean (Glycine max) genome encoding four Gα, four Gβ (Bisht et al., 2011), and 10 Gγ subunits (Choudhury et al., 2011). However, Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G proteins have been implicated in a surprisingly large number of phenotypes, which is seemingly contradictory given the relative scarcity of subunits. Arabidopsis G proteins have been implicated in cell division (Ullah et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2006) and morphological development in various tissues, including hypocotyls (Ullah et al., 2001, 2003), roots (Ullah et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012), leaves (Lease et al., 2001; Ullah et al., 2001), inflorescences (Ullah et al., 2003), and flowers and siliques (Lease et al., 2001), as well as in pathogen responses (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006; Cheng et al., 2015), regulation of stomatal movement (Wang et al., 2001; Coursol et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2008) and development (Zhang et al., 2008; Nilson and Assmann, 2010), cell wall composition (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012), responses to various light stimuli (Warpeha et al., 2007; Botto et al., 2009), responses to multiple abiotic stimuli (Huang et al., 2006; Pandey et al., 2006; Trusov et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2008; Colaneri et al., 2014), responses to various hormones during germination (Ullah et al., 2002), and postgermination development (Ullah et al., 2002; Pandey et al., 2006; Trusov et al., 2007). Since the Gγ subunit appeared to be the only subunit that provides diversity in heterotrimer composition in Arabidopsis, it was proposed that all functional specificity in heterotrimeric G protein signaling was provided by the Gγ subunit (Trusov et al., 2007; Chakravorty et al., 2011; Thung et al., 2012, 2013). This allowed for only three heterotrimer combinations to account for the wide range of G protein-associated phenotypes.In addition to the above typical G protein subunits, the plant kingdom contains a conserved protein family of extra-large GTP-binding proteins (XLGs). XLGs differ from typical Gα subunits in that they possess a long N-terminal extension of unknown function, but they are similar in that they all have a typical C-terminal Gα-like region, with five semiconserved G-box (G1–G5) motifs. The XLGs also possess the two sequence features that differentiate heterotrimeric G protein Gα subunits from monomeric G proteins: a helical region between the G1 and G2 motifs and an Asp/Glu-rich loop between the G3 and G4 motifs (Lee and Assmann, 1999; Ding et al., 2008; Heo et al., 2012). The Arabidopsis XLG family comprises XLG1, XLG2, and XLG3, and all three have demonstrated GTP-binding and GTPase activities, although they differ from GPA1 in exhibiting a much slower rate of GTP hydrolysis, with a Ca²⁺ cofactor requirement instead of an Mg²⁺ requirement, as for canonical Gα proteins (Heo et al., 2012). All three Arabidopsis XLGs were observed to be nuclear localized (Ding et al., 2008). Although much less is known about XLGs than canonical Gα subunits, XLG2 positively regulates resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and was immunoprecipitated with AGB1 from tissue infected with P. syringae (Zhu et al., 2009). xlg3 mutants, like agb1 mutants, are impaired in root-waving and root-skewing responses (Pandey et al., 2008). During the preparation of this report, Maruta et al. (2015) further investigated XLG2, particularly focusing on the link between XLG2 and Gβγ in pathogen responses. Based on symptom progression in xlg mutants, they found that XLG2 is a positive regulator of resistance to both bacterial and fungal pathogens, with a minor contribution from XLG3 in resistance to Fusarium oxysporum. XLG2 and XLG3 are also positive regulators of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in response to pathogen-associated molecular pattern elicitors. The resistance and pathogen-associated molecular pattern-induced ROS phenotypes of the agg1 agg2 and xlg2 xlg3 double mutants were not additive in an agg1 agg2 xlg2 xlg3 quadruple mutant, indicating that these two XLGs and the two Gγ subunits function in the same, rather than parallel, pathways. Unfortunately, the close proximity of XLG2 and AGB1 on chromosome 4 precluded the generation of an agb1 xlg2 double mutant; therefore, direct genetic evidence of XLG2 and AGB1 interaction is still lacking, but physical interactions between XLG2 and the Gβγ dimers were shown by yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays (Maruta et al., 2015). Localization of all three XLGs was also reexamined, indicating that XLGs are capable of localizing to the plasma membrane in addition to the nucleus (Maruta et al., 2015).Interestingly, several other plant G protein-related phenotypes, in addition to pathogen resistance, have been observed only in Gβ and Gγ mutants, with opposite phenotypes observed in Gα (gpa1) mutants. Traditionally, the observation of opposite phenotypes in Gα versus Gβγ mutants in plants and other organisms has mechanistically been attributed to signaling mediated by free Gβγ, which increases in abundance in the absence of Gα. However, an intriguing alternative is that XLG proteins fulfill a Gα-like role in forming heterotrimeric complexes with Gβγ and function in non-GPA1-based G protein signaling processes. If XLGs function like Gα subunits, the corresponding increase in subunit diversity could potentially account for the diversity of G protein phenotypes. In light of this possibility, we assessed the heterotrimerization potential of all possible XLG and Gβγ dimer combinations, XLG localization and its regulation by Gβγ, and the effect of xlg mutation on selected known phenotypes associated with heterotrimeric G proteins. Our results provide compelling evidence for the formation of XLG-Gβγ heterotrimers and reveal that plant G protein signaling is substantially more complex than previously thought.     

Functional Coupling of a Nematode Chemoreceptor to the Yeast Pheromone Response Pathway

Sequencing of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome revealed sequences encoding more than 1,000 G-protein coupled receptors, hundreds of which may respond to volatile organic ligands. To understand how the worm''s simple olfactory system can sense its chemical environment there is a need to characterise a representative selection of these receptors but only very few receptors have been linked to a specific volatile ligand. We therefore set out to design a yeast expression system for assigning ligands to nematode chemoreceptors. We showed that while a model receptor ODR-10 binds to C. elegans Gα subunits ODR-3 and GPA-3 it cannot bind to yeast Gα. However, chimaeras between the nematode and yeast Gα subunits bound to both ODR-10 and the yeast Gβγ subunits. FIG2 was shown to be a superior MAP-dependent promoter for reporter expression. We replaced the endogenous Gα subunit (GPA1) of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ste2Δ sst2Δ far1Δ) triple mutant (“Cyb”) with a Gpa1/ODR-3 chimaera and introduced ODR-10 as a model nematode GPCR. This strain showed concentration-dependent activation of the yeast MAP kinase pathway in the presence of diacetyl, the first time that the native form of a nematode chemoreceptor has been functionally expressed in yeast. This is an important step towards en masse de-orphaning of C. elegans chemoreceptors.     

Modification of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins in Swiss 3T3 Cells Stimulated with Pasteurella multocida Toxin

Many bacterial toxins covalently modify components of eukaryotic signalling pathways in a highly specific manner, and can be used as powerful tools to decipher the function of their molecular target(s). The Pasteurella multocida toxin (PMT) mediates its cellular effects through the activation of members of three of the four heterotrimeric G-protein families, G_q, G₁₂ and G_i. PMT has been shown by others to lead to the deamidation of recombinant Gα_i at Gln-205 to inhibit its intrinsic GTPase activity. We have investigated modification of native Gα subunits mediated by PMT in Swiss 3T3 cells using 2-D gel electrophoresis and antibody detection. An acidic change in the isoelectric point was observed for the Gα subunit of the G_q and G_i families following PMT treatment of Swiss 3T3 cells, which is consistent with the deamidation of these Gα subunits. Surprisingly, PMT also induced a similar modification of Gα₁₁, a member of the G_q family of G-proteins that is not activated by PMT. Furthermore, an alkaline change in the isoelectric point of Gα₁₃ was observed following PMT treatment of cells, suggesting differential modification of this Gα subunit by PMT. G_s was not affected by PMT treatment. Prolonged treatment with PMT led to a reduction in membrane-associated Gα_i, but not Gα_q. We also show that PMT inhibits the GTPase activity of G_q.     

Membrane-Localized Extra-Large G Proteins and Gβγ of the Heterotrimeric G Proteins Form Functional Complexes Engaged in Plant Immunity in Arabidopsis

In animals, heterotrimeric G proteins, comprising Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are molecular switches whose function tightly depends on Gα and Gβγ interaction. Intriguingly, in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), multiple defense responses involve Gβγ, but not Gα. We report here that the Gβγ dimer directly partners with extra-large G proteins (XLGs) to mediate plant immunity. Arabidopsis mutants deficient in XLGs, Gβ, and Gγ are similarly compromised in several pathogen defense responses, including disease development and production of reactive oxygen species. Genetic analysis of double, triple, and quadruple mutants confirmed that XLGs and Gβγ functionally interact in the same defense signaling pathways. In addition, mutations in XLG2 suppressed the seedling lethal and cell death phenotypes of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-associated receptor kinase1-interacting receptor-like kinase1 mutants in an identical way as reported for Arabidopsis Gβ-deficient mutants. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid and bimolecular fluorescent complementation assays revealed that XLG2 physically interacts with all three possible Gβγ dimers at the plasma membrane. Phylogenetic analysis indicated a close relationship between XLGs and plant Gα subunits, placing the divergence point at the dawn of land plant evolution. Based on these findings, we conclude that XLGs form functional complexes with Gβγ dimers, although the mechanism of action of these complexes, including activation/deactivation, must be radically different form the one used by the canonical Gα subunit and are not likely to share the same receptors. Accordingly, XLGs expand the repertoire of heterotrimeric G proteins in plants and reveal a higher level of diversity in heterotrimeric G protein signaling.Heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins), classically consisting of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are essential signal transduction elements in most eukaryotes. In animals and fungi, ligand perception by G protein-coupled receptors leads to replacement of GDP with GTP in Gα, triggering activation of the heterotrimer (Li et al., 2007; Oldham and Hamm, 2008). Upon activation, GTP-bound Gα and Gβγ are released and interact with downstream effectors, thereby transmitting signals to multiple intracellular signaling cascades. Signaling terminates when the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα hydrolyzes GTP to GDP and the inactive heterotrimer reforms at the receptor. The large diversity of mammalian Gα subunits confers specificity to the multiple signaling pathways mediated by G proteins (Wettschureck and Offermanns, 2005). Five distinct classes of Gα have been described in animals (Gαi, Gαq, Gαs, Gα12 and Gαv), with orthologs found in evolutionarily primitive organisms such as sponges (Oka et al., 2009). Humans possess four classes of Gα involving 23 functional isoforms encoded by 16 genes (McCudden et al., 2005), while only a single prototypical Gα is usually found per plant genome (Urano et al., 2013). Multiple copies of Gα are present in some species with recently duplicated genomes, such as soybean (Glycine max) with four Gα genes (Blanc and Wolfe, 2004; Bisht et al., 2011). In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a prototypical Gα subunit (GPA1) is involved in a number of important processes, including cell proliferation (Ullah et al., 2001), inhibition of inward K⁺ channels and activation of anion channels in guard cells by mediating the abscisic acid pathway (Wang et al., 2001; Coursol et al., 2003), blue light responses (Warpeha et al., 2006, 2007), and germination and postgermination development (Chen et al., 2006; Pandey et al., 2006).It is well established that heterotrimeric G proteins play a fundamental role in plant innate immunity. In Arabidopsis, two different Gβγ dimers (Gβγ1 and Gβγ2) are generally considered to be the predominant elements in G protein defense signaling against a variety of fungal pathogens (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006, 2007, 2009; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012; Torres et al., 2013). By contrast, these studies attributed a small or no role to Gα, because mutants deficient in Gα displayed only slightly increased resistance against the fungal pathogens (Llorente et al., 2005; Trusov et al., 2006; Torres et al., 2013). The Gβγ-mediated signaling also contributes to defense against a model bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, by participating in programmed cell death (PCD) and inducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in response to at least three pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs; Ishikawa, 2009; Liu et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2013). Gα is not involved in PCD or PAMP-triggered ROS production (Liu et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2013). Nonetheless, Arabidopsis Gα plays a positive role in defense against P. syringae, probably by mediating stomatal function and hence physically restricting bacterial entry to the leaf interior (Zhang et al., 2008; Zeng and He, 2010; Lee et al., 2013). Given the small contribution from Gα, the involvement of heterotrimeric G proteins in Arabidopsis resistance could be explained in two ways: either the Gβγ dimer acts independently from Gα, raising a question of how is it activated upon a pathogen attack, or Gα is replaced by another protein for heterotrimer formation.The Arabidopsis genome contains at least three genes encoding Gα-like proteins that have been classified as extra-large G proteins (XLGs; Lee and Assmann, 1999; Ding et al., 2008). XLGs comprise two structurally distinct regions. The C-terminal region is similar to the canonical Gα, containing the conserved helical and GTPase domains, while the N-terminal region is a stretch of approximately 400 amino acids including a putative nuclear localization signal (Ding et al., 2008). GTP binding and hydrolysis were confirmed for all three XLG proteins, although their enzymatic activities are very slow and require Ca²⁺ as a cofactor, whereas canonical Gα utilizes Mg²⁺ (Heo et al., 2012). Several other features differentiate XLGs from Gα subunits. Comparative analysis of XLG1 and Gα at the DNA level showed that the genes are organized in seven and 13 exons, respectively, without common splicing sites (Lee and Assmann, 1999). XLGs have been reported to localize to the nucleus (Ding et al., 2008). Analysis of knockout mutants revealed a nuclear function for XLG2, as it physically interacts with the Related To Vernalization1 (RTV1) protein, enhancing the DNA binding activity of RTV1 to floral integrator gene promoters and resulting in flowering initiation (Heo et al., 2012). Therefore, it appears that XLGs may act independently of G protein signaling. On the other hand, functional similarities between XLGs and the Arabidopsis Gβ subunit (AGB1) were also discovered. For instance, XLG3- and Gβ-deficient mutants were similarly impaired in root gravitropic responses (Pandey et al., 2008). Knockout of all three XLG genes caused increased root length, similarly to the Gβ-deficient mutant (Ding et al., 2008). Furthermore, as observed in Gβ-deficient mutants, xlg2 mutants displayed increased susceptibility to P. syringae, indicating a role in plant defense (Zhu et al., 2009). Nevertheless, a genetic analysis of the possible functional interaction between XLGs and Gβ has not been established.In this report, we performed in-depth genetic analyses to test the functional interaction between the three XLGs and Gβγ dimers during defense-related responses in Arabidopsis. We also examined physical interaction between XLG2 and the Gβγ dimers using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) three-hybrid (Y3H) and bimolecular fluorescent complementation (BiFC) assays. Our findings indicate that XLGs function as direct partners of Gβγ dimers in plant defense signaling. To estimate relatedness of XLGs and Gα proteins, we carried out a phylogenetic analysis. Based on our findings, we conclude that plant XLG proteins most probably originated from a canonical Gα subunit and retained prototypical interaction with Gβγ dimers. They function together with Gβγ in a number of processes including plant defense, although they most probably evolved activation/deactivation mechanisms very different from those of a prototypical Gα.     

Gα and Gβ Proteins Regulate the Cyclic AMP Pathway That Is Required for Development and Pathogenicity of the Phytopathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola

We identified and functionally characterized genes encoding three Gα proteins and one Gβ protein in the dimorphic fungal wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola, which we designated MgGpa1, MgGpa2, MgGpa3, and MgGpb1, respectively. Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analyses showed that MgGPA1 and MgGPA3 are most related to the mammalian Gα_i and Gα_s families, respectively, whereas MgGPA2 is not related to either of these families. On potato dextrose agar (PDA) and in yeast glucose broth (YGB), MgGpa1 mutants produced significantly longer spores than those of the wild type (WT), and these developed into unique fluffy mycelia in the latter medium, indicating that this gene negatively controls filamentation. MgGpa3 mutants showed more pronounced yeast-like growth accompanied with hampered filamentation and secreted a dark-brown pigment into YGB. Germ tubes emerging from spores of MgGpb1 mutants were wavy on water agar and showed a nested type of growth on PDA that was due to hampered filamentation, numerous cell fusions, and increased anastomosis. Intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels of MgGpb1 and MgGpa3 mutants were decreased, indicating that both genes positively regulate the cAMP pathway, which was confirmed because the WT phenotype was restored by adding cAMP to these mutant cultures. The cAMP levels in MgGpa1 mutants and the WT were not significantly different, suggesting that this gene might be dispensable for cAMP regulation. In planta assays showed that mutants of MgGpa1, MgGpa3, and MgGpb1 are strongly reduced in pathogenicity. We concluded that the heterotrimeric G proteins encoded by MgGpa3 and MgGpb1 regulate the cAMP pathway that is required for development and pathogenicity in M. graminicola.Signal transduction pathways are important for sensing and responding to different environmental stimuli in both lower and higher eukaryotes. The highly conserved heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) belong to a family of regulatory proteins that are crucial for the transduction of signals, which are perceived by a distinct family of cell surface receptors (4). Heterotrimeric G proteins contain three subunits (α, β, and γ) that are linked in the inactive state. Activation of a Gα subunit by a transmembrane receptor leads to exchange of bound GDP with GTP on the Gα subunit, resulting in dissociation of the Gα and the Gβγ dimeric subunits, which can now interact with downstream effectors that subsequently generate changes in cellular responses (for a review, see reference 10).Filamentous fungi have one Gβ- and usually three Gα-encoding genes that belong to three major groups. Encoded proteins in groups I and III are related to the mammalian Gα_i and Gα_s families, respectively, but group II fungal Gα proteins have no mammalian counterpart (1, 4, 14, 22, 33, 53). Interestingly, the corn smut fungus Ustilago maydis contains a unique fourth Gα-encoding gene, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains only two Gα proteins (10, 57). Irrespective of the observed numerical variation, Gα proteins regulate a variety of cellular and developmental responses (4). For plant-pathogenic fungi, Gβ-encoding genes have been characterized functionally (9, 14, 22, 27, 31, 48, 52). Apart from the fact that individual Gα-encoding genes and the Gβ-encoding gene have been demonstrated to regulate growth, reproduction, and virulence, comparative functional characterization of all Gα-encoding genes has been reported only for a few plant-pathogenic fungi, including Magnaporthe grisea, Cryphonectria parasitica, and U. maydis (5, 41, 57).Mycosphaerella graminicola (anamorph Septoria tritici) causes septoria tritici blotch disease in bread and durum wheat in areas with high rainfall during the growing season, particularly in Western Europe, where it is considered to be the most important wheat disease (30). It is a ubiquitous phytopathogen with a lifestyle completely different from that of the aforementioned plant-pathogenic fungi. It is a dimorphic pathogen, and therefore the transition from a yeast-like to a filamentous form is important for initiation of infection (45). M. graminicola does not form appressoria but penetrates the leaves through stomata without forming specific infection structures. Furthermore, as a hemibiotroph, it has a biotrophic phase of about 10 days that is followed by a rapid switch to necrotrophy. The necrotic foliar lesions bear anamorphic and teleomorphic fructifications. M. graminicola is the model fungus for the Mycosphaerellaceae and even for the order Dothideales, an extremely large and diverse class of fungi with over 1,000 named species, including major plant pathogens such as the banana leaf streak fungus Mycosphaerella fijiensis (12, 21). Large expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries and the recently released genome sequence have been instrumental for the identification and characterization of genes involved in the development and pathogenicity of M. graminicola (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Mycgr3/Mycgr3.home.html). Recently, we reported that genes encoding mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (MgFus3, MgSlt2, and MgHog1) and the catalytic (MgTpk2) and regulatory (MgBcy1) subunits of protein kinase A (PKA) are essential pathogenicity factors and regulate specific steps during the infection process (8, 43-45). To extend our knowledge about the role of G proteins in the development and pathogenicity of M. graminicola, we functionally analyzed three Gα-encoding genes and one Gβ-encoding gene of M. graminicola, which we designated MgGpa1, MgGpa2, MgGpa3, and MgGpb1, respectively. Our results show the requirement of MgGpa1, MgGpa3, and MgGpb1 for pathogenicity, whereas the latter also negatively regulates cell fusion and anastomosis. Among the G protein-encoding genes characterized in this study, MgGpa3 and MgGpb1 positively regulate the cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathway. MgGpa1 seems to be dispensable for cAMP regulation, whereas MgGpa2 appears to be redundant, for none of the assays rendered altered phenotypes. Our results open new perspectives for studying the regulatory machinery of the cAMP pathway in M. graminicola and other plant-pathogenic fungi.