Information for patch assessment: a field investigation with black-chinned hummingbirds

I examined the kinds of information black-chinned hummingbirds(Archilochus alexandri) used when exploiting artificial resourcepatches in the field. I determined whether birds (1) only usedcurrent patch-sample information or (2) combined current patch-samplewith prior information (the distribution of resources amongpatches) to estimate patch quality, and (3) whether the kindsof information used depended on environmental variability. Iestablished two environments that differed in amount of variationin patch subtypes and determined the use of information by assessingthe correlation between the number of rewards obtained and thenumber of consecutive unrewarded patch probes just before patchdeparture. In the low-variance environment, most birds appearedto combine prior information with patch-sample information.Individuals using prior information foraged more efficientlythan those that did not. In the high-variance environment, somebirds appeared to combine patch-sample information with priorinformation, whereas others apparently relied solely on patch-sampleinformation to estimate patch quality, with no difference inforaging efficiency. In both environments, prior informationwas used after approximately 25 patches were exploited.     

The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills

Group foragers may assess patch quality more efficiently bypaying attention to the sampling behavior of group members foragingin the same patch (i.e., using "public information"). To determinewhether red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) use public informationto aid their patch departure decisions, we conducted experimentsthat compared the sampling behavior of crossbills foraging ona two-patch system (one patch was always empty, one patch containingseeds) when alone, in pairs, and in flocks of three. When foragingalone, crossbills departed from empty patches in a way thatwas qualitatively consistent with energy maximization. We foundevidence for the use of public information when crossbills werepaired with two flock mates, but not when paired with one flockmate. When foraging with two flock mates, crossbills sampledapproximately half the number of cones on the empty patch beforedeparting as compared to when solitary. Furthermore, as expected ifpublic information is used, the variance in both the numberof cones and time spent on the empty patch decreased when crossbillsforaged with two flock mates as compared to when alone. Althoughhigh frequencies of scrounging reduce the availability of publicinformation, scrounging is usually uncommon in crossbills, apparentlybecause they exploit divisible patches. Consequently, publicinformation is likely to be important to crossbills in the wild.We also show that feeding performance is greatly diminishedwhen the feeding performances of flock mates differ. This providesa mechanism that will favor assortative grouping by phenotypewhen phenotypes affect feeding performance, which may in turnpromote speciation in some groups of animals.     

Prior knowledge about spatial pattern affects patch assessment rather than movement between patches in tactile-feeding mallard

1. Heterogeneity in food abundance allows a forager to concentrate foraging effort in patches that are rich in food. This might be problematic when food is cryptic, as the content of patches is unknown prior to foraging. In such case knowledge about the spatial pattern in the distribution of food might be beneficial as this enables a forager to estimate the content of surrounding patches. A forager can benefit from this pre-harvest information about the food distribution by regulating time in patches and/or movement between patches. 2. We conducted an experiment with mallard Anas platyrhynchos foraging in environments with random, regular, and clumped spatial configurations of full and empty patches. An assessment model was used to predict the time in patches for different spatial distributions, in which a mallard is predicted to remain in a patch until its potential intake rate drops to the average intake rate that can be achieved in the environment. A movement model was used to predict lengths of interpatch movements for different spatial distributions, in which a mallard is predicted to travel to the patch where it expects the highest intake rate. 3. Consistent with predictions, in the clumped distribution mallard spent less time in an empty patch when the previously visited neighbouring patch had been empty than when it had been full. This effect was not observed for the random distribution. This shows that mallard use pre-harvest information on spatial pattern to improve patch assessment. Patch assessment could not be evaluated for the regular distribution. 4. Movements that started in an empty patch were longer than movements that started in a full patch. Contrary to model predictions this effect was observed for all spatial distributions, rather than for the clumped distribution only. In this experiment mallard did not regulate movement in relation to pattern. 5. An explanation for the result that pre-harvest information on spatial pattern affected patch assessment rather than movement is that mallard move to the nearest patch where the expected intake rate is higher than the critical value, rather than to the patch where the highest intake rate is expected.     

Effects of resource distribution, patch spacing, and preharvest information on foraging decisions of northern bobwhites

We investigated patch assessment by northern bobwhites (Collinusvirginianus) in an experimental arena where the distributionof resources in patches, preharvest information about thesepatches, and spacing of patches varied. We found that preharvestinformation about patch quality and a bimodal distribution ofpatch rewards allowed birds to selectively exploit patches highin resources. In contrast, uniform distribution of patch qualitiesand lack of preharvest information caused birds to forage nonselectivelyamong patches. Birds distinguished among patches of differentquality when these patches were spaced 13 m apart, but failedto react to patch quality differences when patches were 0 or3 m apart We also found a strong effect of the level of patchdepletion on foraging decisions: as resources in die arena becamescarce, birds increasingly foraged selectively in die most profitablepatches. Foraging decisions of bobwhites are biased by die waythey experience and memorize a spatially and temporally variableenvironment. The relative cost of this cognitive bias (i.e.,lost opportunity) is nonlinearty related to die mean resourcedensity in die environment and to die difference between thismean density and die resource density in die exploited patch.Cognitive bias should be considered when evaluating patch assessmentcapabilities of foragers in complex environments.     

Presampling sensory information and prey density assessment by wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae)

Decisions regarding foraging patch residence time and the assessmentof patch quality may be mediated by various sources of information.This study examined the use of sensory cues by hunting spidersto assess prey density in the absence of prey capture. Adultfemale wolf spiders [Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz); Lycosidae]had food withheld for 4 days and then were exposed to artificialforaging patches containing four densities of crickets (0, 3,10, 20) with different sensory stimuli (visual and vibratoryinformation, visual only, and vibratory only). The spiders werenot allowed to feed during trials, and patch residence timewas recorded. The spiders varied patch residence time basedon sensory cues alone and spent more time in patches with higherprey density. With visual information only, spiders could apparentlydistinguish among prey densities almost as well as with visualand vibratory cues combined, but residence time did not differamong prey densities when only vibratory information was presented.Measurements of vibration levels produced by cricket activityunder experimental sensory treatments conform to test results,suggesting that visual detection of crickets is important inpatch assessment used in determining patch residence time.     

Incompletely informed shorebirds that face a digestive constraint maximize net energy gain when exploiting patches

Foragers that feed on hidden prey are uncertain about the intake rate they can achieve as they enter a patch. However, foraging success can inform them, especially if they have prior knowledge about the patch quality distribution in their environment. We experimentally tested whether and how red knots (Calidris canutus) use such information and whether their patch-leaving decisions maximized their long-term net energy intake rate. The results suggest that the birds combined patch sample information with prior knowledge by making use of the potential value assessment rule. We reject five alternative leaving rules. The potential encounter rate that the birds choose as their critical departure threshold maximized their foraging gain ratio (a modified form of efficiency) while foraging. The high experimental intake rates were constrained by rate of digestion. Under such conditions, maximization of the foraging gain ratio during foraging maximizes net intake rate during total time (foraging time plus digestive breaks). We conclude that molluscivore red knots, in the face of a digestive constraint, are able to combine prior environmental knowledge about patch quality with patch sample information to obtain the highest possible net intake over total time.     

Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues

Social animals can observe others' behavior and in the processacquire information of varying quality about a given resource.Theoretical models predict that blind copying of others' behavioris more likely when individuals are only able to observe thedecisions (here "social cues") of others rather than the cues(here "public information") on which such decisions are based.We investigated information use by nine-spined sticklebacks(Pungitius pungitius) in a two-patch foraging context. Socialcues were provided by the number of demonstrator fish presentat each patch (two versus six), which either conflicted withthe demonstrators' observed feeding rate at each patch (publicinformation) or was the only information available. Consistentwith predictions, observers preferred the patch previously associatedwith six demonstrators when social cues were the only availablesource of information but preferred the patch previously associatedwith two demonstrators ("rich" patch) when also provided withpublic information. On the bases of these experiments, we arguethat it is because these fish preferentially base decisionson public information rather than social cues that they canpotentially avoid engaging in erroneous informational cascades.Thus, the availability of public information can help socialanimals make adaptive decisions.     

Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) exploiting patches: response to long-term changes in travel time

In this paper we explore the way foraging animals integrateexperience over time. The marginal value theorem shows thatto maximize long-term gain rate, foragers should adjust patchexploitation to theaverage travel time for the habitat, andmany experiments do find a positive relationship between averagepatch exploitation and average interpatch travel time. Thisrelationship implies that animals use experience to determineforaging tactics but, by itself, does not imply that anythingbut the most recent experience (say, the time taken to findthe current patch) has an effect on behavior. We directly testedthe influence of events before the most recently experiencedtravel by examining adjustments in foraging behavior after stepwisechanges between two homogeneous environments, each with a singletravel distance. Using starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in a closed-economylaboratory simulation of a patchy environment, we found thatduring periods of active foraging, the average number of preyper patch visit is in close agreement with that predicted forrate maximization. After changes in travel time, birds tookapproximately six full cycles of travel and patch use beforereaching a new asymptotic behavior. The pattern of adjustmentdid not vary with successive presentations of the environmentalchange. These results demonstrate that memory for more thanone travel episode is involved in the foraging decisions ofstarlings. We relate our results to apparently conflicting datafrom previous experiments and to models of memory and informationprocessing.     

Patch exploitation strategy by an egg parasitoid in constant or variable environment

Abstract.  1. In this paper, the foraging behaviour (the proximal mechanisms involved in patch-leaving rules and the egg dispersion) of an egg parasitoid, Anaphes victus , was analysed in environments containing either patches of constant quality (i.e. predictable environment) or patches of variable quality (i.e. unpredictable environment) in order to determine the motivational mechanisms used in patch-leaving strategies.
2. Comparison of the patch exploitation strategy of A. victus between the different habitats suggested that the response of A. victus to a given patch quality strongly depended on its past experiences. Females allocated more time and more eggs in a mixed quality patch after experiencing a poor quality patch than after experiencing a good quality patch. In a poor quality patch, females superparasitised more frequently after experiencing a poor quality patch than after experiencing a good quality patch. In a good quality patch, A. victus females laid more eggs after having visited two poor quality patches than after visiting good quality patches.
3. Recent foraging experiences are used to estimate both the availability and spatial distribution of hosts in the environment and adjust foraging decisions accordingly. The observed variability in the patch-leaving rules within the same species stresses the importance of previous experience when describing behaviours of female parasitoids.     

Risk-Sensitive Foraging in a Patch Departure Context: A Test with Worker Bumble Bees

Typically, tests of risk-sensitive foraging involve observinga subject's choices of alternative prey types differing in somecombination of mean and variance of expected foraging gain.Here, we consider the problem of risk-sensitive foraging whenthere is a single prey type. We observed worker bumble bees(Bombus occidentalis) foraging in an array of artificial 2-flowerinflorescences. After visiting the bottom flower in an inflorescenceand obtaining a reward of some size, the bee decides whetherto visit the top flower or to move to a new inflorescence (apatch departure). Here, risk-sensitive behavior is expressedas the forager's choice of patch departure threshold (PDT) ofreward obtained in the bottom flower. We measured the PDTs ofbees whose colony energy stores (and therefore energy requirements)had been manipulated (Enhanced or Depleted). Simulations ledus to predict that shortfall-minimizing bees should decreasetheir PDTs when their colony energy reserves were depleted,relative to when the reserves were enhanced. Bees did not usea strict patch departure threshold, but instead the probabilityof departure varied with nectar volume in the bottom flower.Colony energy stores did affect patch departure behavior, butthis effect was confounded by the order in which manipulationof colony reserves was applied. Further, simulations of observedbee patch departure decisions did not produce behavior expectedif the decisions were based on shortfall-minimization. We concludethat a bee's decision of when to leave an inflorescence is notpredicted by a static shortfall-minimizing model. Our resultsalso implicate an important interaction between learning andforaging requirements. We review risk-sensitivity in bees, anddiscuss why risk-sensitive foraging may be adaptive for bumblebees.     

Social information, social feeding, and competition in group-living goats (Capra hircus)

There are both benefits (e.g., social information) and costs(e.g., intraspecific competition) for individuals foraging ingroups. To ascertain how group-foraging goats (Capra hircus)deal with these trade-offs, we asked 1) do goats use socialinformation to make foraging decisions and 2) how do they adjusttheir intake rate in light of having attracted by other groupmembers? To establish whether goats use social information,we recorded their initial choice of different quality food patcheswhen they were ignorant of patch quality and when they couldobserve others foraging. After determining that goats use socialinformation, we recorded intake rates while they fed alone andin the presence of potential competitors. Intake rate increasedas the number of competitors increased. Interestingly, lonegoats achieved an intake rate that was higher than when onecompetitor was present but similar to when two or more competitorswere present. Faster intake rates may allow herbivores to ingesta larger portion of the available food before competing groupmembers arrive at the patch. This however, does not explainthe high intake rates achieved when the goats were alone. Weprovide 2 potential explanations: 1) faster intake rates area response to greater risk incurred by lone individuals, theloss of social information, and the fear of being left behindby the group and 2) when foraging alone, intake rate is no longera trade-off between reducing competition and acquiring socialinformation. Thus, individuals are able to feed close to theirmaximum rate.     

Knowing your habitat: linking patch-encounter rate and patch exploitation in parasitoids

According to optimal foraging theory, animals should decidewhether or not to leave a resource patch by comparing the currentprofitability of the patch with the expected profitability ofsearching elsewhere in the habitat. Although there is abundantevidence in the literature that foragers in general are wellable to estimate the value of a single resource patch, theirdecision making has rarely been investigated with respect tohabitat quality. This is especially true for invertebrates.We have conducted experiments to test whether parasitic waspsadjust patch residence time and exploitation in relation tothe abundance of patches within the environment. We used thebraconid Asobara tabida, a parasitoid of Drosophila larvae,as our model species. Our experiments show that these waspsreduce both the residence time and the degree of patch exploitationwhen patches become abundant in their environment, as predictedby optimal foraging models. Based upon a detailed analysis ofwasp foraging behavior, we discuss proximate mechanisms thatmight lead to the observed response. We suggest that parasitoidsuse a mechanism of sensitization and desensitization to chemicalsassociated with hosts and patches, in order to respond adaptivelyto the abundance of patches within their environment.     

Habitat assessment by parasitoids: mechanisms for patch use behavior

Animals foraging for patchily distributed resources may optimizetheir foraging decisions concerning the patches they encounter,provided that they base these decisions on reliable informationabout the profitability of the habitat as a whole. Females ofthe parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes exploit aphid hosts,which typically aggregate in discrete colonies. We show herehow between-colony travel time and the number of aphids in previouslyvisited colonies affect parasitoid foraging behavior. We firstassumed that parasitoids use travel time and previous colonysize to estimate a mean rate of fitness gain in the habitatand derived quantitative predictions concerning the effect ofthese two variables on patch residence time and patch-leavingrate of attack. We then tested these theoretical predictionsin laboratory experiments in which female parasitoids were allowedto visit two successive colonies. As predicted, the observedresidence time in the second colony increased with increasingtravel time and decreasing size of the first colony. Patch-leavingrate of attack decreased with increasing travel time but wasnot affected by previous colony size. These results suggestthat parasitoids use these two variables to assess habitat quality.However, discrepancies between the data obtained and quantitativepredictions show that the effect of travel time on patch usemay be more complex than assumed in our model.     

The effect of intra- and interspecific aggression on patch residence time in Negev Desert gerbils: a competing risk analysis

We observed patch-use behavior by two gerbil species in a fieldsetting and investigated how aggression and intrinsic decision-makinginteract to influence patch residence times. Results were interpretedby using a competing risk analysis model, which uniquely enabledus to estimate the intrinsic patch-leaving decisions independentlyof external interruptions of foraging bouts by aggression. Theexperiment was conducted in two 1-ha field enclosures completelysurrounded by rodent-proof fences and included allopatric (onlyGerbillus andersoni allenbyi) and sympatric (G. a. allenbyiand G. pyramidum) treatments. We predicted that increased foodpatch quality (i.e., habitat quality) should decrease intrinsicpatch-leaving rates and increase rates of aggressive interactionsinvolving the forager feeding in the patch (i.e., the occupantindividual). We also anticipated that increasing populationdensity should result in an increase in the rate of aggressiveinteractions involving the occupant individual. Our resultssupported the first two predictions, indicating a trade-offbetween foraging and aggression. However, the third predictionwas realized only for G. a. allenbyi in allopatry. Furthermore,in allopatry, occupant G. a. allenbyi individuals with highcompetitive ranks were involved in aggressive interactions atlower rates than those with low competitive ranks. However,in sympatry, patch-use behavior of occupant G. a. allenbyi individualswas mainly influenced by aggressive behavior of G. pyramidum,which did not respond to their competitive rank. Thus, it shouldpay less for G. a. allenbyi to be aggressive in sympatric populations.The observed reduction in intraspecific aggression among individualG. a. allenbyi in the presence of G. pyramidum supports thisassertion. We suggest that this reduction likely weakens thenegative effect of intra- and interspecific density on the percapita growth rate of G. a. allenbyi. Because this would changethe slope of the isocline of G. a. allenbyi, it could be animportant mechanism promoting coexistence when habitat selectionis constrained.     

The survival-rate-maximizing policy for Bayesian foragers: wait for good news

We present a model of the survival-maximizing foraging behaviorof an animal searching in patches for hidden prey with a clumpeddistribution. We assume the forager to be Bayesian: it updatesits statistical estimate of prey number in the current patchwhile foraging. When it arrives at the parch, it has an expectationof the patch's quality, which equals the average patch qualityin the environment While foraging, the forager uses its informationabout the time spent searching in the patch and how many preyhas been caught during this time. It can estimate both the instantaneousintake rate and the potential intake rate during the rest ofthe parch visit. When prey distribution is clumped, potentialintake rate may increase with time spent in the parch if preyis caught in the near future. Being optimal, a Bayesian foragershould therefore base its patch-leaving decision on the estimatedpotential patch value, not on the instantaneous parch value.When patch value is measured in survival rate and mortalitymay occur either as starvation or predation, the patch shouldbe abandoned when the forager estimates that its potential survivalrate dining the rest of the patch visit equals the long termsurvival rate in the environment This means that the instantaneousintake rate, when the patch is left, is nor constant but isan increasing function of searching time in the patch. Therefore,the giving-up densities of prey in the patches will also behigher the longer the search times. The giving-up densitiesare therefore expected to be an increasing, but humped, functionof initial prey densities. These are properties of Bayesianforaging behavior not included in previous empirical studiesand model tests.     

Patch exploitation, group foraging, and unequal competitors

Charnov's (1976) marginal value theorem, MVT, addresses howlong a forager should stay in a patch of prey to maximize itsgain. Information-sharing models of group foraging suggest thatindividuals should join groups to improve their patch-findingrate. This is achievable if group members share informationabout the location of food patches. The determinants of theMVT are searching time and cumulative gain against time in apatch, those of the group foraging models are searching time,group size, and individual differences in ability to monopolizethe prey found. After combining the MVT and information-sharingmodels we explore the consequences of unequal competitors (good,G, and poor, P) foraging in groups. Under this domain G andP differ in their accumulated harvest against time in a patch.When the gain function of P is obtained by mere scaling of thatof G, optimal patch residence times for individuals of the twophenotypes do not differ. However, if the gain functions ofG and P cannot be derived from each other by a constant scalingmultiplier, the optimal patch times for G and P are not necessarilythe same. Under these conditions the model suggests that foraginggroups should become assorted by foraging ability.     

The foraging benefits of information and the penalty of ignorance

Patch use theory and the marginal value theorem predict that a foraging patch should be abandoned when the costs and benefits of foraging in the patch are equal. This has generally been interpreted as all patches being abandoned when their instantaneous intake rate equals the foraging costs. Bayesian foraging – patch departure is based on a prior estimate of patch qualities and sampling information from the current patch – predicts that instantaneous quitting harvest rates sometimes are not constant across patches but increase with search time in the patch. That is, correct Bayesian foraging theory has appeared incompatible with the widely accepted cost–benefit theories of foraging. In this paper we reconcile Bayesian foraging with cost–benefit theories. The general solution is that a patch should be left not when instantaneous quitting harvest rate reaches a constant level, but when potential quitting harvest rate does. That is, the forager should base its decision on the value now and in the future until the patch is left. We define the difference between potential and instantaneous quitting harvest rates as the foraging benefit of information, FBI. For clumped prey the FBI is positive, and by including this additional benefit of patch harvest the forager is able to reduce its penalty of ignorance.     

The higher the better: sentinel height influences foraging success in a social bird

In all social species, information relevant to survival and reproduction can be obtained in two main ways: through personal interaction with the environment (i.e. ‘personal’ information) and from the performance of others (i.e. ‘public’ information). While public information is less costly to obtain than personal information, it may be inappropriate or inaccurate. When deciding how much to rely on public information, individuals should therefore assess its potential quality, but this possibility requires empirical testing in animals. Here, we use the sentinel system of cooperatively breeding pied babblers (Turdoides bicolor) to investigate how behavioural decisions of foragers are influenced by potential variation in the quality of anti-predator information from a vigilant groupmate. When sentinels moved to a higher position, from where their probability of detecting predators is likely to be greater, foragers reduced their vigilance, spread out more widely and were more likely to venture into the open. Consequently, they spent more time foraging and increased their foraging efficiency, resulting in a profound increase in biomass intake rate. The opposite behavioural changes, and consequent foraging outcomes, were found when sentinels moved lower. A playback experiment demonstrated that foragers can use vocal cues alone to assess sentinel height. This is the first study to link explicitly a measure of the potential quality of public information with a fitness measure from those relying on the information, and our results emphasize that a full understanding of the evolution of communication in complex societies requires consideration of the reliability of information.     

Failure of simple optimal foraging models to predict residence time when patch quality is uncertain

Blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) were presented with a foragingsituation in which half of the patches they encountered containedno prey and half contained a single prey item. Experimentallydetermined probability distributions controlled prey arrivaltimes in those patches that contained prey. Patch residencein empty patches was studied during four experiments. In thefirst, prey arrival was exponentially distributed. Residencetimes increased with travel time as predicted by a rate-maximizationmodel, but the bird stayed in empty patches much longer thanpredicted. During the second experiment, prey arrival was uniformlydistributed. The jays again stayed longer than optimal, andpatch residence times increased as travel time increased, althoughthe residence time that maximized rate of intake was independentof travel time under these conditions. In the third experiment,exponential and uniform patches were randomly intermixed. Thejays showed larger travel-time effects in the exponential thanin the uniform patch. However, the travel-time effect in theuniform patch was contrary to rate-maximization predictions,and the birds again overstayed in both patch types. In the fourthexperiment, prefeeding at the start of each foraging bout slightlyincreased overstaying rather than decreasing overstaying, aswould be expected if overstaying were due to underestimatingenvironmental quality. Consistent and dramatic overstaying anda travel-time effect under conditions where travel time hasno effect on optimal residence times suggest that the rate-maximizationapproach does not apply to foraging problems involving patchuncertainty.     

Foraging Patch Selection and Departure by Non-Omniscient Foragers: A Field Example in White-Fronted Geese

Animals often face great uncertainty as to the quality of foraging patches. There have been a number of theoretical studies investigating how non‐omniscient predators, i.e. predators that are unable to assess foraging patch quality prior to patch exploitation, should forage in a heterogeneous environment, but empirical studies, especially in the field, are scarce. This paper describes the way in which white‐fronted geese Anser albifrons forage on harvest remains of rice, focusing on the processes of patch selection and departure. Not only in autumn, but also in spring when rice depletion has progressed, patch rice density showed no positive effect on patch selection by geese, indicating the incapability of geese to select the most profitable patch. Instead, the geese tended to select patches with a large proportion of rice fields that were near the roost and a previously visited patch and bordered by a small number of windbreaks only. The rice consumption volume by geese increased with increasing initial rice density, while giving‐up density was independent of initial rice density and was positively correlated to the mean rice density of the habitat. This suggests that the geese could compensate their lack of information on patch quality at the moment of patch selection by leaving less profitable patches earlier. We discuss the necessity of predictive models based on random patch selection and an appropriate departure rule to explain the distribution of individuals of species with limited information on patch quality.