A specific endonuclease from Haemophilus haemolyticus.

A restriction-like endonuclease, HhaI, has been partially purified from Haemophilus haemolyticus. This enzyme cleaves bacteriophage lambda DNA and adenovirus-2 DNA at many sites, and cleaves simian virus 40 DNA at only two sites. It recognizes the sequence 5′ -G-C-G-↓C-3′ 3′ -C-↑G-C-G-5′, and cuts at the sites indicated by the arrows.     

A specific endonuclease from Arthrobacter luteus.

A new restriction-like endonuclease, AluI, has been partially purified from Arthrobacter luteus. This enzyme cleaves bacteriophage λ DNA, adenovirus-2 DNA and simian virus 40 DNA at many sites including all sites cleaved by the endonuclease HindIII from Haemophilus influenzae serotype d. Radioactive oligonucleotides in pancreatic DNAase digests of (5′-³²P)-labelled fragments of phage λ DNA released by the action of AluI had the 5′ terminal sequence pC-T-N-. The enzyme recognises the tetranucleotide sequence

and cleaves it at the position marked by the arrows.     

Characterization of a site-specific restriction endonuclease SphI from Streptomyces phaeochromogenes

A new type-II restriction endonuclease SphI, has been partially purified from Streptomyces phaeochromogenes. SphI recognizes the hexanucleotide sequence 5′-GCATG↓C and cleaves it at the position marked by the arrow. This nucleotide sequence is present twice in SV40 DNA, four times in λ DNA and only once in the cloning vehicles pBR322, pBR325, pBR327 and pBR328.     

A new specific endonuclease from Xanthomonas badrii

A restriction-like endonuelease, XbaI, has been partially purified from Xanthomonas badrii. This enzyme cleaves adenovirus-2 DNA at four sites, bacteriophage lambda DNA at only one site, and does not cleave simian virus 40 DNA. It recognizes the sequence

and cuts at the sites indicated by the arrows.     

A specific endonuclease from Brevibacterium albidum

A new restriction-like endonuclease, BalI, has been partially purified from Brevibacterium albidum. This enzyme cleaves bacteriophage λ DNA at least 18 times and adenovirus-2 DNA at least 16 times, but does not cleave simian virus 40 DNA. All sites cleaved by BalI are also cut by the specific endonuclease HaeIII from Haemophilus aegyptius. The recognition sequence of BalI is 5′-T-G-G ↓ C-C-A-3′ 3′-A-C-C ↓ G-G-T-5′ and the cleavage site is indicated by the arrows.     

A new specific endonuclease present in Xanthomonas holcicola, Xanthomonas papavericola and Brevibacterium luteum

A new specific endonuclease, XhoI, has been partially purified from Xanthomonas holcicola. This enzyme cleaves adenovirus-2 DNA at five sites, bacteriophage λ DNA at one site, φX174 DNA at one site, but does not cleave simian virus 40 DNA. It recognizes the sequence

and cuts at the sites indicated by the arrows. Enzymes with identical specificity have also been found in Xanthomonas papavericola and Brevibacterium luteum.     

A new restriction endonuclease from Streptomyces albus G.

A restriction endonuclease, SalI, has been partially purified from Streptomyces albus G. This enzyme cleaves adenovirus-2 DNA at three sites, bacteriophage λ DNA at two sites, but does not cleave simian virus 40 DNA or φX174 DNA. It recognizes the sequence

and cuts at the sites indicated by the arrows. An endonuclease (XamI) with similar specificity has also been isolated from Xanthomonas amaranthicola.     

Two sequence-specific endonucleases from Moraxella bovis

Two new sequence-specific endodeoxyribonucleases have been partially purified from Moraxella bovis. These restriction-like enzymes, MboI and MboII, each cleave bacteriophage lambda DNA and adenovirus-2 DNA at more than 50 sites. MboI recognizes the sequence 5′ ↓ G-A-T-C 3′ 3′ C-T-A-G ↑ 5′ and cleaves at the sites indicated by the arrows. A specific endonuclease, MosI, has also been purified from Moraxella osloenis and recognizes the same sequence as MboI.     

Clusters of repeated sequences of chicken DNA are extensively methylated but contain specific undermethylated regions

In the chicken genome there are middle repetitive DNA sequences with a clustered organization. Each cluster is composed of members of different families of repeated DNA sequences and usually contains only one member of each family. Many clusters have the same assortment of repeated sequences but they are in scrambled order from cluster to cluster. These clusters usually exceed 20 × 10³ bases in length and comprise at least 10% of the repeated DNA of the chicken. The repeated sequences that are cluster components are extensively methylated. Methylation was detected by comparing HpaII and MspI digests of total DNA, where the occurrence of the sequence C-m⁵C-G-G is indicated when HpaII (cleaves C-C-G-G) fragments are larger than those generated by MspI (cleaves C-m⁵C-G-G or C-C-G-G). In hybridization experiments with Southern (1975) blots of total DNA digested with either HpaII or MspI, the cloned probes representing clustered repeated sequences showed a dramatic difference in the lengths of restriction fragments detected in the two digests. Many of the sequences that comprise these clusters are methylated in most of their genomic occurrences. There are patterns of methylation that are reproduced faithfully from copy to copy. The overall distribution of methylation within clusters seems to be regional, with long methylated DNA segments interrupted by specific undermethylated regions.     

High efficiency detection of bi-stranded abasic clusters in gamma-irradiated DNA by putrescine

Bi-stranded abasic clusters, an abasic (AP) site on one DNA strand and another nearby AP site or strand break on the other, have been quantified using Nfo protein from Escherichia coli to produce a double-strand break at cluster sites. Since recent data suggest that Nfo protein cleaves inefficiently at some clusters, we tested whether polyamines, which also cut at AP sites, would cleave abasic clusters at higher efficiency. The data show that Nfo protein cleaves poorly at clusters containing immediately opposed AP sites and those separated by 1 or 3 bp. Putrescine (PUTR) cleaved more efficiently than spermidine or spermine, and did not cleave undamaged DNA. It cleaved abasic clusters in oligonucleotide duplexes more effectively than Nfo protein, including immediately opposed or closely spaced clusters. PUTR cleaved more efficiently than Nfo protein by a factor of ~1.7 or ~2 for DNA that had been γ-irradiated in moderate or non-radioquenching conditions, respectively. This suggests that the DNA environment during irradiation affects the spectrum of cluster configurations. Further comparison of PUTR and Nfo protein cleavage may provide useful information on abasic cluster levels and configurations induced by ionizing radiation.