基于红外相机数据的贵州高原山地环境野猪生境选择研究

近年来野猪(Sus scrofa)在我国南方山地森林生态系统中种群数量激增、生态影响强烈,是人兽冲突的典型代表,然而对其生境选择规律仍缺乏深入研究。利用2015年7月至2020年1月的长时红外相机监测数据,对贵州高原几处环境中野猪的生境选择进行了研究,共得到野猪利用样方201个,非利用样方121个。(1)Vanderploeg和Scavia选择指数分析表明,野猪喜爱活动于坡度≤20°、乔木郁闭度>0.8和草本盖度为0.2—0.4的生境类型;不喜爱的生境类型为海拔>1600 m,坡度>25°,草本盖度<0.1,距道路距离≤100 m。(2)野猪生境资源选择函数为Logit(P)=3.226-海拔×0.002-坡度×0.161+乔木郁闭度×2.078+灌木平均高×0.401+草本盖度×3.566+距道路距离×0.001+距居民点距离×0.0003,选择概率为P=e⁽logit(p))/(1+e⁽logit(p))),受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估模型的预测精度为87.8%,能够较好预测野猪的生境选择。(3)利用Mann-...     

黄河三角洲自然保护区东方白鹳的巢址利用

2009年3-5月,在黄河三角洲保护区,运用Vanderploeg和Scavia选择指数和资源选择函数对25个东方白鹳巢址的利用进行了研究。结果表明:东方白鹳偏好选择在芦苇沼泽中的电线杆上筑巢,巢区水面比例较大,样方内水深度>15cm,植被较高,盖度较大,植被密度200-500根/m²,巢址距明水面、芦苇沼泽、树林距离较近,明水面深度<0.5m,距离人为干扰、农田、草地较远。东方白鹳巢址利用的资源选择函数为:logist(p)=-0.206-2.773×距明水面距离+2.200×距公路距离+1.444×距轻度干扰地距离+1.205×距草地距离＋1.191×植被密度,模型正确率:88.6％,R²=0.721。食物、人为干扰和植被密度是影响东方白鹳巢址利用的主要因素。     

内蒙古达赉湖自然保护区狼冬季的生境选择

内蒙古达赉湖自然保护区狼的生境受到了自然环境变化压力和人为干扰的严重影响。为了解内蒙古达赉湖自然保护区狼的冬季生境特征,于2008年10-12月,在内蒙古达赉湖国家级自然保护区对狼的冬季生境选择进行了研究。野外共测量了59个20m×20m样方中的11个生态因子,运用聚类分析和主成分分析法,对狼的冬季生境选择因子进行了分析。结果表明,狼的生境主要特征为:隐蔽程度中等以上,水源距离100m,生境类型为高草阔地、干旱苇塘和河套,植被类型是以芦苇和柳灌丛为优势种的沼泽植被,植被高度1.0m,食物丰富度良好,居民点距离1000m,距草原道路距离1000m,牧场距离500m。影响狼冬季生境选择的主要因子为植被高度、植被类型和隐蔽级。次要因子为距围栏距离、雪深、距水源距离、生境类型、距牧场距离、食物丰富度和距居民点距离。     

应用资源选择函数对褐马鸡冬季夜栖地选择的研究

2006年11月至2007年1月,在陕西黄龙山腹地的北寺山林区,对褐马鸡Crossoptilon mantchuricum冬季夜栖地的选择进行了研究。共记录到34个夜宿地,以夜宿树为中心各做一个10m×10m样方,测定夜栖地海拔、坡向、坡度、坡位、夜栖树高度和胸径、乔木层盖度、乔木数量、灌木层盖度、草本盖度、离最近水源距离、离林间道路的距离、离最近林缘的距离、离最近居民点距离等参数;对照样方采用随机抽样法,在研究区域内设置同样数目的对照样方,测定同样指标。结果表明,褐马鸡冬季夜栖地选择的资源选择函数为:logit(p)=-11.537 2.245×坡度 3.452×乔木盖度 2.001×乔木数量-2.903×与最近居民点的距离。根据拟合出的资源选择函数,褐马鸡冬季对夜栖地的选择概率为P=elogit(p)/(1 elogit(p)),模型的正确预测率可达到93.8%。模型表明,冬季褐马鸡夜栖地的选择概率与坡度、乔木盖度和栖树数量呈正相关,与距居民点距离呈负相关。     

蜂桶寨自然保护区小熊猫对生境的选择

2002年4月至11月,在邛崃山系宝兴蜂桶寨自然保护区设点,应用资源选择函数和资源选择指数研究了小熊猫对生境的选择和利用。结果表明,影响小熊猫生境选择的关键因子是水源距离、竹子基径、灌木密度;次关键因子是坡位、树桩密度、倒木密度;次要因子是坡向、乔木密度;而郁闭度、坡度、植被类型、乔木高度、灌木高度、树桩高度、树洞密度、人为干扰的影响不明显。小熊猫喜欢在水源较近(<250m)、竹子长势良好(基径大于4 0mm)、灌木和乔木密度大(大于1 5株 20m2)、树桩和倒木数量多(>1根 400m2)、中上坡位、南坡的针叶林或针阔混交林活动。小熊猫的生境资源选择函数为:logit(P)=-13 527-3 180×水源距离 2 702×竹子基径 2 582×灌木密度 2 134×树桩密度 2 104×坡位 1 622×倒木密度-1 066×坡向 0 934×乔木密度……小熊猫对生境的选择概率为:P=elogit(P) (1 elogit(P))     

白鹤中途停歇地主要食物藨草球茎密度的空间插值方法研究

扁杆藨草(Scirpus planiculmis)和三江藨草(S.nipponicus)的球茎是迁徙白鹤(Grus leucogeranus)在莫莫格中途停歇地的主要食物。2010年9月15～25日,对莫莫格白鹤集中停歇地鹅头泡湿地的20条样线上100 m等间隔470个取样点进行了地下0～20 cm的藨草球茎的取样工作。基于此,采用反距离权重、4种径向基函数和普通克里格共6种空间插值方法模拟了该区域藨草球茎密度。交叉验证和插值结果的空间分布图对比,径向基函数中的张力样条插值效果最佳,是最适于该区域挺水植物藨草球茎密度的空间插值方法。张力样条插值结果表明:研究区内藨草球茎密度均值为(46.0±44.3)个/m2。其中,<25个/m2的面积占研究区的41.7%,25～100个/m2的面积占45.9%,而>100个/m2的面积仅占12.4%。研究结果为下一步分析白鹤迁徙种群与环境因子的生态关系、预测该地区白鹤的环境容纳量提供十分重要的基础数据。     

张广才岭藏獾洞穴生境选择

2008年9月至2009年8月,在黑龙江省方正林业局新风林场,用不定宽样线法对藏獾洞穴生境选择进行研究,共记录了55组藏獾洞穴,藏獾洞口平均直径为(27.40±7.15)cm,洞深平均为(84.18±22.04)cm,倾角平均为(26.36±9.10)°,洞口总数=3.02个常用洞数+0.80个不常用洞数+0.56个废弃洞数。相对于对照样方而言,藏獾洞穴更偏爱选择位于郁闭度和植被盖度小,灌木密度大、距离近,乔木距离远,距水源和农田近、人为干扰距离远,坡度较缓的向阳中坡位的生境。资源选择函数模型为:logit(p)=246.980-1.059×植被盖度-0.703×距水源距离-1.403×坡度-45.005×坡向,模型的正确预测率为93.9%。     

贺兰山同域分布岩羊和马鹿发情季节的生境选择差异

2007年和2008年9—12月,在宁夏贺兰山国家级自然保护区和内蒙古贺兰山国家级自然保护区利用痕迹检验法和直接观察法对同域分布的岩羊和马鹿发情季节生境选择进行研究。通过在选定的15条沟段里进行调查,分别测定了岩羊和马鹿的177个和154个样方的18种生态因子。结果表明,发情季节岩羊和马鹿在植被类型、地形特征、优势乔木、坡向、坡位、灌木密度、灌木高度、植被盖度、坡度、海拔高度、距水源距离、人为干扰距离、距裸岩距离和隐蔽级等生态因子选择上存在极显著差异(P0.01),乔木高度存在显著差异(P0.05),而其余生态因子无显著差异(P0.05),相对于马鹿选择的生境而言,岩羊发情季节更偏爱选择地势陡峭的山地疏林草原带,优势乔木以较高的灰榆为主,灌木密度低但高度较高,植被盖度较低,坡度较大的阳坡中上部,海拔较低,接近水源和裸岩,隐蔽程度低的生境。典则系数显示发情季节岩羊和马鹿的生境选择几乎完全分离,Wilk’sλ值也显示发情季节岩羊和马鹿的生境选择具有很高的差异性(Wilk’sλ=0.123,χ2=679.172,df=10,P0.001)。发情季节岩羊和马鹿的Fisher线性判别函数分别为:F岩羊=3.638×乔木高度+0.242×乔木距离+7.766×灌木高度+0.663×灌木距离+0.232×植被盖度+0.191×坡度+0.001×距水源距离+0.008×距裸岩距离+0.307×隐蔽级-31.078;F马鹿=4.850×乔木高度+0.321×乔木距离+12.024×灌木高度+0.929×灌木距离+0.192×植被盖度+0.482×坡度+0.002×距水源距离-0.001×人为干扰距离-0.003×距裸岩距离+0.511×隐蔽级-50.787。逐步判别分析表明在区分发情季节岩羊和马鹿生境方面有一系列生态因子发挥作用,依照贡献值的大小依次为坡度、人为干扰距离、隐蔽级、距裸岩距离、乔木高度、乔木距离、距水源距离、灌木高度、灌木距离和植被盖度,由这10个变量构成的方程对发情季节岩羊和马鹿生境的正确区分率达到99.7%。     

丹顶鹤春迁期觅食栖息地多尺度选择——以双台河口保护区为例

双台河口保护区是世界濒危鸟类丹顶鹤大陆种群西线群体不同生活史阶段的重要栖息地。2008-2010年3-4月,采用定点观察法、二维坐标法、方差分析、因子分析等方法对保护区内春迁期丹顶鹤觅食栖息地的多尺度选择进行了监测分析。研究结果表明：(1)春迁期,该保护区丹顶鹤觅食栖息地选择包括2个尺度3个选择,即大生境尺度内觅食生境类型选择和小生境尺度内觅食区选择、觅食微生境选择;(2)觅食生境类型偏好选择芦苇沼泽(90.00%),也偶选玉米地、泥滩、草甸等生境;(3)觅食区选择通过宏生境因子和干扰因子来判定,宏生境因子包括明水面、堤坝和火烧地,距离均在30m以内;干扰因子包括居民区和油田等强干扰因子和道路等弱干扰因子,均采取远离的方式进行回避,居民区保持在1km以上,油田保持在2km以上,道路保持在300-500m;(4)觅食微生境选择通过微生境因子来判定,包括植被高度、植被密度、植被直径等,选择盖度小(<5%)且植被高度小于喙长的区域觅食。     

贺兰山马鹿冬季取食和卧息生境选择

2007年12月至2008年1月,在贺兰山地区,利用痕迹检验法和直接观察法对马鹿阿拉善亚种的冬季取食和卧息生境选择进行研究.通过在选定的15条沟段里进行调查,共测定了72个取食利用样方,59个卧息利用样方和131个对照样方的18种生态因子.结果表明,马鹿在冬季偏好的取食地为平滑起伏坡,以酸枣、柳为优势乔木、混合型树林或空地,乔木高大稀疏、间距较远,灌木密度大,草本盖度较高,位于<15°的半阴半阳坡的下坡位,距裸岩远,隐蔽度高;偏好的卧息地在山地疏林草原带的平滑起伏坡上,以酸枣、柳为优势乔木、混合型树林或空地,乔木高大稀疏,灌木矮小、稀疏且距离较远,草本盖度较高,位于<15°阳坡的下坡位,远离裸岩,隐蔽程度高.马鹿冬季的取食和卧息生境在草本盖度和隐蔽度上差异极显著.相对于卧息生境, 马鹿冬季的取食生境对草本盖度和隐蔽度要求更低一些.马鹿冬季取食地的资源选择函数为1.155-0.149×乔木高度-0.066×草本盖度+0.190×坡度,模型的正确判别率为86.8%;马鹿冬季卧息地的资源选择函数为 -30.936+0.494×乔木高度+0.257×坡度-0.002×海拔高度+0.387×隐蔽度,模型的正确判别率为95.8%.食物、隐蔽条件以及贺兰山的独特地形特征是影响马鹿冬季取食和卧息生境选择的主要因素.     

Seasonal habitat selection by adult female polar bears in western Hudson Bay

Individual variation in habitat selection has emerged as an important component necessary for understanding population ecology. For threatened species, where habitat loss and alteration affect population trends, understanding habitat use provides insight into mechanisms of population change. Polar bears, Ursus maritimus, in the Western Hudson Bay subpopulation have experienced declines in body condition, survival, and abundance associated with delayed freeze-up and earlier break-up of sea ice due to climate change. Although this subpopulation has been intensively studied, sea ice habitat selection remains poorly understood. We developed a habitat selection model using a mixed conditional logistic regression to determine habitat selection across seasons (freeze-up, early winter, late winter, break-up) and assess individual variation in habitat selection. We used 8487 locations collected between 2004 and 2010 from 64 GPS satellite linked radio-collars on adult females to compare habitat selected to habitat available. Selection changed across seasons and varied the most among individuals during the freeze-up and break-up seasons. During later winter, there was less variation in habitat selection among individuals and bears showed the least amount of selection in habitat use. Distance to the denning area, a core terrestrial refuge habitat, was the top-ranked covariate in all seasons suggesting site fidelity plays a role in habitat selection. Some individual variation may have been due to reproductive status, though we could not account for this directly. Recognizing individual differences, especially in a rapidly changing environment, allows managers to identify critical habitats instead of simply average resources, and may lead to more successful efforts to protect habitats.     

Relationship between resource selection, distribution, and abundance: a test with implications to theory and conservation

Much of applied and theoretical ecology is concerned with the interactions of habitat quality, animal distribution, and population abundance. We tested a technique that uses resource selection functions (RSF) to scale animal density to the relative probability of selecting a patch of habitat. Following an accurate survey of a reference block, the habitat-based density estimator can be used to predict population abundance for other areas with no or unreliable survey data. We parameterized and tested the technique using multiple years of radiotelemetry locations and survey data collected for woodland caribou across four landscape-level survey blocks. The habitat-based density estimator performed poorly. Predictions were no better than those of a simple area estimator and in some cases deviated from the observed by a factor of 10. We developed a simulation model to investigate factors that might influence prediction success. We experimentally manipulated population density, caribou distribution, ability of animals to track carrying capacity, and precision of the estimation equation. Our simulations suggested that interactions between population density, the size of the reference block, and the pattern of distribution can lead to large discrepancies between observed and predicted population numbers. Over- or undermatching patch carrying capacity and precision of the estimator can influence predictions, but the effect is much less extreme. Although there is some empirical and theoretical evidence to support a relationship between animal abundance and resource selection, our study suggests that a number of factors can seriously confound these relationships. Habitat-based density estimators might be effective where a stable, isolated population at equilibrium is used to generate predictions for areas with similar population parameters and ecological conditions.     

Distinct seasonal habitat selection by annually sedentary mountain hares (Lepus timidus) in the boreal forest of Sweden

Mountain hares (Lepus timidus) show high site fidelity even though they are non-territorial and sometimes make long excursions to new areas outside their home range. This study investigates how far apart consecutive annual and seasonal home ranges of the same individual are situated, how much they overlap and if habitat preference can explain the observed high site fidelity. The results show that hares usually overlap their previous home range, both between seasons and years, although the seasonal overlap is smaller, indicating that hares show a more pronounced change of areas between seasons than between years. The seasonal habitat selection was very distinct, tracking changing resource availability between seasons, while the annual selection was difficult to interpret as it mixed the seasonal patterns. Consequently, the annual selection seems to be merely an artefact from the more important seasonal selection. I therefore caution that results from habitat selection studies based on annual home ranges that are estimated from animals in seasonally differing environments should be treated with care. It appears that while seasonal home ranges are selected on the basis of resource availability, there is sufficient variation in the strength of this response to suggest that a mountain hares local knowledge of an area could also explain fidelity to their annual home ranges.     

Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress

Mate choice for good-genes remains one of the most controversial evolutionary processes ever proposed. This is partly because strong directional choice should theoretically deplete the genetic variation that explains the evolution of this type of female mating preference (the so-called lek paradox). Moreover, good-genes benefits are generally assumed to be too small to outweigh opposing direct selection on females. Here, we review recent progress in the study of mate choice for genetic quality, focussing particularly on the potential for genotype by environment interactions (GEIs) to rescue additive genetic variation for quality, and thereby resolve the lek paradox. We raise five questions that we think will stimulate empirical progress in this field, and suggest directions for research in each area: (1) How is condition-dependence affected by environmental variation? (2) How important are GEIs for maintaining additive genetic variance in condition? (3) How much do GEIs reduce the signalling value of male condition? (4) How does GEI affect the multivariate version of the lek paradox? (5) Have mating biases for high-condition males evolved because of indirect benefits?     

Horn growth patterns in Alpine chamois

The analysis of horn growth may provide important information about the allocation of metabolic resources to secondary sexual traits. Depending on the selective advantages offered by horn size during intra- and inter-specific interactions, ungulates may show different investment in horn development, and growth variations within species may be influenced by several parameters, such as sex, age, or resource availability. We investigated the horn growth patterns in two hunted populations of Alpine chamois (Rupicapra r. rupicapra) in the Central Italian Alps. We tested the role of individual heterogeneity on the growth pattern and explored the variation in annulus length as a function of different factors (sex, age, hunting location, cohort). We then investigated the mechanisms underlying horn growth trajectories to test for the occurrence of compensatory or recovery growth and their potential differences between sexes and populations. Annulus length varied as a function of sex, age of individuals and, marginally, hunting location; no effect of cohort or individual heterogeneity was detected. Male and female chamois showed compensatory horn growth within the first 5½ years of life, though the partial convergence of horn trajectories in chamois suggests that this mechanisms would best be described as ‘recovery growth’. Compensation rates were greater in males than in females, while only compensatory growth rates up to 2½ years of age were different in the two populations. Besides confirming the sex- and age-dependent pattern of horn development, our study suggests that the mechanism of recovery growth supports the hypothesis of horn size as a weakly selected sexual trait in male and female chamois. Furthermore, the greater compensation rates in horn growth shown by male chamois possibly suggest selective effects of hunting on age at first reproduction, while different compensation rates between populations may suggest the occurrence of some plasticity in resource allocation to sexual traits in relation to different environments.     

马可波罗盘羊夏季采食地选择

2016和2017年每年的6至8月,采用样方法调查位于新疆帕米尔高原东部塔古克自治县境内塔什库尔干野生动物自然保护区马可波罗盘羊（Ovis ammon polii）的采食地,共测量了46个采食地样方和相同数量的对照样方。分析了坡向、坡位、坡度、海拔、植被盖度、灌木、禾草类以及非禾草类草本物种数量、植株密度、地上生物量、距水源距离以及距人为干扰距离等12个生态因子对马可波罗盘羊采食地选择的影响。结果表明,马可波罗盘羊夏季采食地样方与对照样方间仅坡度、海拔和距水源距离等3个因子无显著差异。Vanderploeg和Scavia选择指数分析表明,马可波罗盘羊夏季采食地对各生态因子均具有明显的选择性。Y(X) = e (26.145﹣0.008A + 15.102V + 0.653F + 0.001D)是马可波罗盘羊的资源选择函数,即植被盖度（V）、非禾草类草本植物种数（F）、海拔（A）和人为干扰距离（D）是影响马可波罗盘羊生境选择的4个关键生态因子。ROC曲线分析表明,该函数的预测精度为94.38%,能够很好地反映马可波罗盘羊夏季采食地选择的基本情况。     

Effects of spatial pattern and relatedness in an experimental plant community

Many plant species show limited dispersal resulting in spatial and genetic substructures within populations. Consequently, neighbours are often related between each other, resulting in sibling competition. Using seed families of the annuals Capsella bursa-pastoris and Stachys annua we investigated effects of spatial pattern (i.e. random versus aggregated) on total and individual performance at the level of species and seed families under field conditions. At the level of species, we expected that inferior competitors increase, while superior competitors decrease their performance within neighbourhoods of conspecifics. Thus, we expected a species by spatial pattern interaction. Sibling competition, however, might reduce the performance of competitors, when genetically related, rather than non-related individuals are competing. Therefore, aggregations at the level of seed families could decrease the performance of competitors. Alternatively, if the opposite outcome would be observed, kin selection might be hypothesized to have occurred in the past. Because heavy seeds are expected to disperse less than light seeds, we further hypothesized that kin selection might be more likely to occur in superior competitors with heavy, locally dispersed seeds (e.g. Stachys) compared to inferior competitors with light, more distantly dispersed seeds (e.g. Capsella). We found a significant species by spatial pattern interaction. Indeed, the inferior competitor, Capsella, showed increased reproductive biomass production in aggregated compared to random patterns. Whereas, the performance of the superior competitor, Stachys, was to some extent decreased by intraspecific aggregation. Although statistically not significant, effects of intrafamily aggregations tended to be rather negative in Capsella but positive in Stachys. Our results confirmed that spatial patterns affect growth and reproduction of plant species promoting coexistence in plant communities. Although, we could not provide strong evidence for sibling competition or kin selection, our results suggested that competition among relatives was more severe for Capsella (lighter seeds) compared to Stachys (heavier seeds).     

Habitat and home range fidelity in a trophically dimorphic pumpkinseed sunfish (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Lepomis gibbosus</Emphasis>) population

We investigated habitat selection in a trophically dimorphic population of pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus) to determine whether littoral and limnetic ecotypes exhibit habitat or site fidelity. A transplant experiment was conducted, in which 998 pumpkinseeds captured from littoral and limnetic sites were marked and released in either the site of capture, the nearest site of the same habitat type, or the nearest site of the opposite habitat type. Daily recapture attempts over the course of the reproductive and growing season provided a 25% recapture rate, 40% of which were recaptured on multiple occasions at the same site. Site fidelity was very high in both ecotypes. Results estimated with a multi-state transition model indicated that the probability of a transplanted pumpkinseed returning to its site of origin ranged from 74% for limnetic pumpkinseeds released into a different limnetic or littoral site, to 93% for littoral pumpkinseeds released into a limnetic site. Furthermore, the probability of a pumpkinseed being recaptured at its site of origin if not transplanted was estimated at 97 and 98% for limnetic individuals and littoral individuals, respectively. Discriminant Function Analysis of helminth parasite loads sampled from littoral and limnetic individuals could classify site of origin with 96–100% accuracy, suggesting that the habitat and site fidelity patterns observed with mark–recapture are indicative of long-term habitat segregation of the two forms. The results of our experiment provide compelling evidence of correlated habitat selection as a function of home range fidelity within both ecotypes of a subtly dimorphic species. Such behaviour could have a significant effect on present or future gene flow.