Transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor: analysis of the process when receptor is bound to progesterone and RU38486

Effects of different transforming agents were examined on the sedimentation characteristics of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) bound to the synthetic progestin [3H]R5020 or the known progesterone antagonist [3H]RU38486 (RU486). [3H]R5020-receptor complexes [progesterone-receptor complexes (PRc)] sedimented as fast migrating 8S moieties in 8-30% linear glycerol gradients containing 0.15 M KCl and 20 mM Na2MoO4. Incubation of cytosol containing [3H]PRc at 23 degrees C for 10-60 min, or at 0 degrees C with 0.15-0.3 M KCl or 1-10 mM ATP, caused a gradual transformation of PRc to a slow sedimenting 4S form. This 8S to 4S transformation was molybdate sensitive. In contrast, the [3H]RU486-receptor complex exhibited only the 8S form. Treatment with all three activation agents caused a decrease in the 8S form but no concomitant transformation of the [3H]RU486-receptor complex into the 4S form. PR in the calf uterine cytosol incubated at 23 or at 0 degrees C with 0.3 M KCl or 10 mM ATP could be subsequently complexed with [3H]R5020 to yield the 4S form of PR. However, the cytosol PR transformed in the absence of any added ligand failed to bind [3H]RU486. Heat treatment of both [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes caused an increase in DNA-cellulose binding, although the extent of this binding was lower when RU486 was bound to receptors. An aqueous two-phase partitioning analysis revealed a significant change in the surface properties of PR following both binding to ligand and subsequent transformation. The partition coefficient (Kobsd) of the heat-transformed [3H]R5020-receptor complex increased about 5-fold over that observed with PR at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antiprogestin-receptor complexes: differences in the interaction of the antiprogestin RU38,486 and the progestin R5020 with the progesterone receptor of human breast cancer cells

In order to understand the molecular basis for antiprogestin action, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin [3H]RU38, 486 (RU486) and the progestin [3H]R5020 with the progesterone receptor (PR). In both MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells, we have observed marked differences in the sedimentation properties of the PR on high salt sucrose gradients: while the R5020-receptor complexes sediment at approximately 4 S (4.4 +/- 0.1 S), the RU486-receptor sediments as a prominent 6 S species as well as a 4 S species. This binding is abolished by excess unlabelled R5020, RU486 or progesterone, but is unaffected by excess unlabelled hydrocortisone or dexamethasone, indicating that both the 4 S and 6 S species represent the PR and not glucocorticoid receptor. Although the relative distribution of 4 S and 6 S forms is not altered by treatment with DNAse or RNAse, exposure to 10 mM thioglycerol or to 3 M urea results in conversion of the 6 S to the 4 S form, suggesting that disulfide bonds and hydrophobic interactions are important in maintaining the integrity of the 6 S form. These findings suggest that the 6 S antiprogestin complex is formed as a result of the interaction of PR units with each other or with a different protein. This change in receptor association state may be an important aspect of the antiprogestin activity of RU486.     

The antiprogesterone RU486 stabilizes the heterooligomeric, non-DNA-binding, 8S-form of the rabbit uterus cytosol progesterone receptor

The salt-induced (0.3 M KCl) transformation of the non-transformed, heterooligomeric 8S-form of the rabbit uterus cytosol progesterone receptor (PR) was analyzed by density gradient ultracentrifugation (8S----4S conversion) and DNA-cellulose chromatography (non-binding----binding forms). After 1 h treatment at 2 C, greater than 90% of agonist (R5020 or Org2058)-PR complexes were transformed, contrary to antagonist (RU486)-PR complexes, which did not undergo any transformation. Thus, there is stabilization of the non-transformed receptor form by RU486 as compared to the effect of agonist binding. The hydrodynamic parameters of both agonist- and antagonist-bound non-transformed receptors were similar and the calculated Mr were approximately 283,000 and approximately 293,000, respectively. In both cases, purification indicated the presence of a 90-kD non-hormone-binding protein associated with the hormone binding unit(s). Transformation of RU486-PR complexes occurred after exposure to high salt at increased temperature and was correlated to the dissociation of the 90-kD protein from the receptor. Both agonist- and antagonist-bound transformed forms of PR had apparent similar affinities for DNA-cellulose. Molybdate-stabilized and KCl-treated RU486-PR complexes were more stable, as assessed by steroid binding, than the corresponding R5020-PR complexes, arguing in favor of a stabilizing effect of both the 90-kD protein and RU486 against inactivation. These cell-free experiments support the concept that RU486 in the rabbit uterus system stabilizes the 8S non-DNA binding, non-transformed form of the receptor at low temperature. The possibility that impaired dissociation of the heterooligomeric receptor form is involved in the antiprogesterone activity of RU486 is discussed.     

Effects of the steroid antagonist RU486 on dimerization of the human progesterone receptor.

We previously reported, using a coimmunoprecipitation assay, that the B form (PR-B) of the human progesterone receptor from T47D human breast cancer cells dimerizes in solution with the A receptor (PR-A) and that the extent of dimerization correlates with receptor binding activity for specific DNA sequences [DeMarzo, A.M., Beck, C.A., O?ate, S.A., & Edwards, D.P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 72-76]. This suggested that solution dimerization is an intermediate step in the receptor activation process. The present study has tested the effects of the progesterone antagonist RU486 on solution dimerization of progesterone receptors (PR). As determined by the coimmunoprecipitation assay, RU486 binding did not impair dimerization of receptors; rather, the antagonist promoted more efficient solution dimerization than the progestin agonist R5020. This enhanced receptor dimerization correlated with a higher DNA binding activity for transformed receptors bound with RU486. RU486 has been shown previously to produce two other alterations in the human PR when compared with R5020. PR-RU486 complexes in solution exhibit a faster sedimentation rate (6 S) on salt-containing sucrose density gradients than PR-R5020 complexes (4 S), and PR-DNA complexes have a faster electrophoretic mobility on gel-shift assays in the presence of RU486. We presently show that the 6 S PR-RU486 complex is a receptor monomer, not a dimer. The increased sedimentation rate and increased mobility on gel-shift assays promoted by RU486 were also observed with recombinant PR-A and PR-B separately expressed in insect cells from baculovirus vectors. These results suggest that RU486 induces a distinct conformational change both in PR monomers in solution and in dimers bound to DNA. We also examined whether conformational changes in PR induced by RU486 would prevent a PR polypeptide bound to RU486 from heterodimerization with another PR polypeptide bound to R5020. To evaluate this, PR-A and PR-B that were separately bound to R5020 or RU486 in whole cells were mixed in vitro. PR-A-RU486 was capable of dimerization with PR-B-R5020, and this was demonstrated for heterodimers both formed in solution and bound to specific DNA. The capability to form heterodimers in vitro raises the possibility that the antagonist action of RU486 in vivo could in part be imposed in a dominant negative fashion through heterodimerization between one receptor subunit bound to an agonist and another bound to RU486.     

RU486, a progestin antagonist, binds to progesterone receptors in a human endometrial cancer cell line and reverses the growth inhibition by progestins

The human endometrial cancer cell line, IK-90 cells, contains estrogen-independent progesterone receptors (PR) and is progestin sensitive. Accumulation of glycogen in the cytoplasm of IK-90 cells as well as growth inhibition of the cells in response to progestins are observed. In the present study, the effects of RU486, a progestin antagonist, on IK-90 cells were investigated in a serum-supplemented medium. Scatchard plot analysis of cytoplasmic binding data in the cells revealed a high affinity binding site for RU486 (Kd, 2.6 nM) with maximum binding sites of 169 fmol/mg protein. However, the binding ability to DNA-cellulose of heat activated [3H]RU486-PR complexes was lower when compared with that of the progestin agonist [3H]R5020-PR complexes, suggesting a decrease in progestin activity of RU486 in IK-90 cells. The addition of 1 microM RU486 to culture medium produced periodic acid-Schiff-positive granules in the cytoplasm of the cells. On the other hand, RU486 (1 nM-1 microM) did not significantly inhibit the growth of cells. However, RU486 (0.1-1 microM) totally prevented the growth-inhibitory effect of R5020 (0.1-1 microM) on IK-90 cells. In conclusion, RU486, an antiprogestin, had a dual activity both a progestin antagonist and weak agonist in human endometrial cancer cells, which was not mediated through the estrogen receptor system.     

Mammalian progesterone receptor shows differential sensitivity to sulfhydryl group modifying agents when bound to agonist and antagonist ligands

Modulation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR), in relation to its binding to synthetic steroids with known agonist (R5020) and antagonist (RU486) properties, was studied in the presence of iodoacetamide (IA), N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), beta-mercaptoethanol (MER), and dithiothreitol (DTT). Pretreatment of uterine cytosol at 4 degrees C with NEM (4-10 mM) reduced the binding of [3H]RU486 to PR by 40%, but [3H] R5020 binding was completely abolished. Whereas IA (2-10 mM) treatment did not affect [3H]RU486 binding, [3H]R5020 binding was totally eliminated. DTT or MER increased the binding of both steroids slightly (15%). [3H]R5020- or [3H]RU486-receptor complexes (Rc) migrated in the 8 S region and were eliminated upon pretreatment with NEM. At 23 degrees C, DTT increased the amount of 4 S [3H]R5020-Rc, but had no effect on the [3H]RU486-Rc. In the control, [3H]RU486 binding to the 8 S PR could be competed with radioinert R5020 or RU486, but R5020 failed to compete in the presence of IA. The heat-treated [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-Rc showed reduced binding to DNA-cellulose in the presence of NEM and IA. The results of our study suggest that SH group modifications differentially influence the properties of mammalian PR complexed with either R5020 or RU486. In the presence of IA, the [3H]RU486-Rc remained in the 8 S form when incubated at 23 degrees C, indicating that RU486 binding causes conformational changes in PR which are distinct from those that result upon R5020 binding.     

The nonactivated progesterone receptor is a nuclear heterooligomer

The discovery of the nuclear localization of estradiol and progesterone receptors in the absence of the steroid hormone has led to reconsideration of the model of cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of these receptors upon exposure to hormone. Unoccupied nonactivated receptors are thought to be weakly bound to nuclei of target cells from which they are leaking during tissue fractionation and thus found in the cytosol fraction of homogenates in a nontransformed heterooligomeric "8-9 S" form, which includes hsp90. However, no direct biochemical evidence has yet been obtained for the presence of such heterooligomers in the target cell nucleus, possibly because it dissociates in high ionic strength medium used for extraction of the nuclear receptor. We took advantage of the combined stabilizing effects of tungstate ions and antiprogestin RU486 to extract a nuclear non-DNA binding nontransformed 8.5 S-RU486-progesterone receptor complex from estradiol-treated immature rabbit uterine explants incubated with the antagonist. As demonstrated by immunological criteria and by irreversible cross-linking with dimethylpimelimidate, the complex contained, in addition to the hormone binding unit, hsp90, and p59, another nonhormone binding protein. Control experiments carried out with the progestin R5020 yielded the expected nuclear transformed DNA binding 4.5 S-R5020-progesterone receptor complex. These results offer evidence for two distinct forms of steroid receptor in target cell nuclei. Besides the classical "4 S" agonist-receptor complex, tightly bound to the DNA-chromatin structure and in all probability able to trigger the hormonal response, we have observed in the RU486-bound state a non-DNA binding nontransformed 8.5 S form, presumably already present in the nucleus in the absence of hormone and representing the native nonactive form of the receptor.     

Characterization of R5020 and RU486 binding to progesterone receptor from calf uterus

We have examined and compared the binding characteristics of the progesterone agonist R5020 [promegestone, 17,21-dimethylpregna-4,9(10)-diene-3,20-dione] and the progesterone antagonist RU486 [mifepristone, 17 beta-hydroxy-11 beta-[4-(dimethylamino) phenyl]-17 alpha-(prop-1-ynyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one] in calf uterine cytosol. Both steroids bound cytosol macromolecule(s) with high affinity, exhibiting Kd values of 5.6 and 3.6 nM for R5020 and RU486 binding, respectively. The binding of the steroids to the macromolecule(s) was rapid at 4 degrees C, showing saturation of binding sites at 1-2 h for [3H]progesterone and 2-4 h for both [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486. Addition of molybdate and glycerol to cytosol increased the extent of [3H]R5020 binding. The extent of [3H]RU486 binding remained unchanged in the presence of molybdate, whereas glycerol had an inhibitory effect. Molybdate alone or in combination with glycerol stabilized the [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes at 37 degrees C. Although the rate of association of [3H]RU486 with the cytosolic macromolecule was slower than that of [3H]R5020, its dissociation from the ligand-macromolecule complex was significantly slower than [3H]R5020. Competitive steroid binding analysis revealed that [3H]progesterone, [3H]R5020, and [3H]RU486 compete for the same site(s) in the uterine cytosol, suggesting that all three bind to the progesterone receptor (PR). Sedimentation rate analysis showed that both steroids were bound to a molecule that sediments in the 8S region. The 8S [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486 peaks were abolished by excess radioinert progesterone, RU486, or R5020.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Novel antiprogestins Org 31806 and 31710: interaction with mammalian progesterone receptor and DNA binding of antisteroid receptor complexes.

We have examined steroid binding parameters and transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) liganded with progestins (progesterone and R5020) and the newly synthesized antiprogestins (Org 31806 and 31710). Species specificity analysis indicated that [3H]R5020 binding in the chicken oviduct cytosol could be eliminated in the presence of 100-fold excess radioinert progesterone and R5020 but not Org 31806 and 31710. In the calf uterine cytosol, the progestins and the antiprogestins appeared to interact with the same PR as revealed by the displacement of [3H]R5020 by all of the above steroids. When the extent of [3H]R5020 binding was examined in the presence of different concentrations of radioinert steroids, the relative affinity with which these compounds interacted with the uterine PR was found to be comparable. A 23 degrees C incubation of cytosol transformed the progestin-bound PR complexes increasing their binding to DNA-cellulose from 5 (0 degrees C, nontransformed) to 35%. Under these conditions, 20% Org 31710- and RU486-occupied PR complexes bound to DNA-cellulose whereas only 10% Org 31806-receptor complexes were retained by the resin. Transformation (23 degrees C) of cytosol receptor caused a loss of the larger 8 S form and an increase in the smaller 4 S form. In its unliganded state or when it was complexed with R5020 or the antiprogestins, incubation of PR at 23 degrees C led to dissociation of the receptor-associated 90 kDa heat-shock protein (hsp90). The PR-hsp90 association was stabilized in the presence of 10 mM iodoacetamide when the ligand binding site was occupied by Org 31806 and 31710. The R5020-receptor complexes, however, allowed release of hsp90 under the above transforming conditions. Our results indicate that although Org 31806 and 31710 show no affinity for the avian PR, these steroids interact with the mammalian PR. We propose that the reported antiprogestational effects of Org 31806 and 31710 are mediated via their interaction with PR which appears similar to one that exists between PR and RU486.     

Characterization of ligand binding,DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor by two novel progesterone receptor antagonist ligands

In order to gain a better understanding of the distinctive mechanisms of the various types of antiprogestins, we have characterized in vitro ligand binding, specific DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor (PR) from T47D cells after treatment of cells with progestins (progesterone, R5020) and antiprogestins (RU486, ZK98299, Org 31806 and Org 31710). Treatment of the cells with R5020 or PR antagonists, with the exception of ZK98299, resulted in a quantitative upshift of PR-A and PR-B indicative of ligand/DNA-induced phosphorylation of PR. Treatment of cells with RU486, Org 31710 or Org 31806, but not R5020 or ZK98299 resulted in detectable PR-progesterone response element complexes (PR-PREc) as assessed by gel mobility shift assay. Although treatment of cells with ZK98299, a type I PR antagonist, did not induce phosphorylation, the antiprogestins, Org 31806 and Org 31710, in a manner identical to RU486, did. Our data suggest that Org 31806 and Org 31710 affect propertie s of PR from T47D cells that are similar to RU486. (Mol Cell Biochem 175: 205–212, 1997)     

Ligand-specific dynamics of the progesterone receptor in living cells and during chromatin remodeling in vitro

Progesterone receptor (PR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, is a key regulator of several processes in reproductive function. We have studied the dynamics of the interaction of PR with a natural target promoter in living cells through the use of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis and also have characterized the dynamics of the interaction of PR with the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter reconstituted into chromatin in vitro. In photobleaching experiments, PR in the presence of the agonist R5020 exhibits rapid exchange with the MMTV promoter in living cells. Two PR antagonists, RU486 and ZK98299, have opposite effects on receptor dynamics in vivo. In the presence of RU486, PR binds to the promoter and is exchanged more slowly than the agonist-activated receptor. In contrast, PR bound to ZK98299 is not localized to the promoter and exhibits higher mobility in the nucleoplasm than the agonist-bound receptor. Significantly, PR bound to R5020 or RU486 can recruit the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex to the promoter, but PR activated with ZK98299 cannot. Furthermore, we found ligand-specific active displacement of PR from the MMTV promoter during chromatin remodeling in vitro and conclude that the interaction of PR with chromatin is highly dynamic both in vivo and in vitro. We propose that factor displacement during chromatin remodeling is an important component of receptor mobility and that ligand-specific interactions with remodeling complexes can strongly influence receptor nuclear dynamics and rates of exchange with chromatin in living cells.     

Agonist and antagonist-induced qualitative and quantitative alterations of progesterone receptor from breast cancer cells

T47D cells, cultured in medium containing serum stripped of endogenous steroids, proliferate in response to treatment with the progesterone receptor (PR) agonist, R5020 or the PR agonist/antagonist, RU486, whereas the full PR antagonist, ZK98299 has no proliferative effects. Under estrogenized conditions, all of the PR ligands tested inhibit cell growth [23]. In order to determine whether the levels or phosphorylation state of PR are reflected in the growth patterns of T47D cells, we monitored the effects of these PR ligands on the immunoblotted PR band intensities, the relative intensities, of PR-A and PR-B, and their phosphorylation states that are reflected in their altered mobility during SDS-PAGE. Under conditions where the PR ligands inhibit cell proliferation, each ligand had distinctively different qualitative and quantitative effects on PR. Short term treatment of the cells with R5020 or RU486 induced a characteristic phosphorylation-dependent upshift of both PR-A and PR-B. The phosphorylated PR was stable for up to 4 days after treatment of the cells with RU486, but was down regulated between 6-24 h after treatment with R5020. No replenishment of PR in cells treated with R5020 was detected. ZK98299, at concentrations tested, had no qualitative or quantitative effects on PR. Culturing cells for 8 days in medium containing steroid-depleted serum caused a significant reduction in the PR band intensity without causing a change in the ratio of PR-A and PR-B or their phosphorylation states. This decrease in the PR band intensity was reversed by maintaining the cells in 1 nM estrogen, but was potentiated by RU486 or ZK98299. These observations support the view that decreased PR levels may play a role in the stimulatory effects of R5020 and RU486 when cells are cultured under non-estrogenized conditions.     

Progestin and antiprogestin effects on progesterone receptor transformation

Transformation of the rabbit uterine progesterone receptor following binding to several synthetic steroids was studied. Cytosolic receptors were prepared with and without 10 mM sodium molybdate. Following incubation with the 3H-ligands the cytosols were chromatographed on phosphocellulose minicolumns. The rank order of the compounds to promote transformation in the absence of molybdate was: medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) greater than 17 alpha, 21-dimethyl-19-nor-4,9-pregnadiene-3,20-dione (R5020) greater than progesterone much greater than deoxycorticosterone (DOC) much greater than 20 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (20 alpha OH-P). The rank order was the same in the presence of molybdate, but the amount of transformation was reduced by 35-90%. Molybdate inhibited transformation to a greater extent when the receptor was bound to progesterone, DOC and 20 alpha OH-P than when bound to MPA or R5020. The antiprogestin, 11 beta-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl]-17 beta-hydroxy-17-(1-propynyl)-4,9-estradiene-3-one (RU38486, synthesized by The Upjohn Company and designated U-66990), promoted approximately twice as much receptor transformation as did progesterone. MPA, R5020 and U-66990 all dissociated from the progesterone receptor much more slowly than did progesterone. In all cases dissociation was faster in the presence of molybdate than in its absence. These data demonstrate that potent progestins (MPA and R5020) promote a greater amount of receptor transformation than does progesterone, and that steroids with little progestin bioactivity (DOC and 20 alpha OH-P) promote very little transformation. In addition, the antiprogestin activity of U-66990 cannot be attributed to a lack of progesterone receptor transformation nor to a rapid rate of dissociation from the receptor.     

Estrogen-inducible progesterone receptor in primary cultures of rat glial cells

The presence of an estrogen-inducible progesterone receptor was demonstrated in primary cultures of newborn rat glial cells by biochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. The progesterone receptor (PR) was measured 3-4 weeks after primary culture in estradiol-containing or control medium. Cells were labeled with the synthetic progestin [3H]R5020 followed by ultracentrifugation analysis of the cellular extracts. A "9 S" PR was observed in the cytosol and a "4-5 S" PR was found in the nuclear high salt, tungstate ions containing extract of estradiol-treated cells. When the antiprogestin [3H]RU486 was used instead of [3H]R5020 as a ligand, a 9 S PR was also found in the cytosol, but a nonactivated "8.5 S" receptor complex was identified in the high salt nuclear fraction in presence of tungstate ions. The levels of PR, as measured by whole cell assay, were significantly increased when glial cells were cultured in the presence of 50 nM estradiol, as compared to nonestradiol-treated controls. The estrogen induction of PR was suppressed by the antiestrogen tamoxifen, but tamoxifen by itself had no effect on PR concentration. When the glucocorticosteroid receptor and PR were measured in parallel after estradiol treatment of the same primary culture, only the levels of PR were increased. The PR was visualized inside glial cells by immunohistochemical studies with a monoclonal antibody specific for the B-form of PR (KC 146), which was recognized by fluorescein-linked or biotinylated secondary antibodies. Strong staining was observed in estradiol-treated cultures, when compared to a weaker staining in control cultures. This is the first demonstration of PR in rat glial cells, and we present evidence of its induction by estradiol in primary cultures.     

Interaction of the antiestrogen [3H]H1285 with the two forms of the molybdate-stabilized calf uterine estrogen receptor

The high affinity antiestrogen [3H]H1285 bound to the cytosol calf uterine estrogen receptor dissociated very slowly (t 1/2 approx 30 h at 20 degrees C) and did not demonstrate a change in dissociation rate in the presence of molybdate, which is characteristic of [3H]estradiol-receptor complexes. [3H]H1285-Receptor complexes sediment at approx 6S on 5-20% sucrose density gradients containing 0.3M KCl with or without 10 mM molybdate. This is in contrast to [3H]estradiol-receptor complexes which sedimented at approx 4.5S without molybdate and at approx 6S with molybdate. These results suggest a physicochemical difference in the estrogen receptor when occupied by antiestrogens versus estrogens. We recently reported that the cytoplasmic uterine estrogen receptor, when bound by estradiol and prepared in 10 mM molybdate, eluted from DEAE-Sephadex columns as Peak I (0.21 M KCl) & Peak II (0.25 M KCl). However, [3H]H1285 bound to the estrogen receptor eluted only as one peak at 0.21 M KCl, also suggesting that the initial interaction of antiestrogens with the estrogen receptor is different. We have extended these studies and report that H1285 can compete with [3H]estradiol for binding to both forms of the estrogen receptor and [3H]H1285 can bind to both forms if the unoccupied receptor is first separated by DEAE-Sephadex chromatography. However, if the receptor is first bound by unlabeled H1285, eluted from the column and post-labeled by exchange with [3H]estradiol, only one peak is measured. Thus, it appears that H1285 binding alters the properties of the receptor such that all receptor components seem to elute as one form. These partially purified [3H]H1285-receptor complexes obtained from DEAE-Sephadex columns sedimented as 5.5S in sucrose density gradients in contrast to the sedimentation values for the [3H]estradiol-receptor components eluting as Peak I (4.5S) and Peak II (6.3S). These differences in the physicochemical characteristics of the estrogen receptor when bound by estrogen versus antiestrogens may be related to some of the biological response differences induced by these ligands.     

Steroid hormone-dependent interaction of human progesterone receptor with its target enhancer element

We investigated the requirement of steroid hormone for the specific binding of progesterone receptor to its cognate progesterone responsive element (PRE) in cell-free experiments. We prepared unfractionated nuclear extracts from human breast cancer (T47D) cells which are rich in progesterone receptors and used a gel retardation assay to monitor receptor-DNA complex formation. Exposure of receptor to either progesterone, R5020, or the antiprogestin RU38 486 in vivo or in vitro led to the formation of two protein-DNA complexes (1 and 2) which were not detected in nuclear extracts unexposed to hormone. Similar treatment with cortisol or estradiol failed to induce the formation of these complexes. The complexes were specific for PRE, since they could be competed efficiently in binding competition experiments by oligonucleotides containing PRE. A monoclonal antibody which recognizes both A and B forms of human progesterone receptor, interacted with both complexes 1 and 2 and shifted them to slower migrating forms. Another antibody which only recognizes the B form interacted with only complex 1 but not with complex 2, establishing that the complexes 1 and 2 were indeed formed by progesterone receptor forms B and A, respectively. We conclude from the above studies that in vivo or in vitro treatment of nuclear progesterone receptor with either progesterone or R5020 or RU38 486 alone can lead to detection of high affinity complexes formed between the PRE and the receptor present in unpurified nuclear extracts.     

Aldosterone nuclear receptors in kidneys of chick embryo

We have studied the properties of the nuclear receptors for aldosterone in kidneys of chick embryo. Aliquots of 0.4 M KCl nuclear extracts were incubated with [3H]aldosterone with or without 1 microM RU28362, a potent glucocorticoid analog. Scatchard analyses of binding data revealed two classes of binding sites with Ka of 0.26 and 0.03 X 10(9) M-1 and Nmax of 330 fmol and 620 fmol/mg DNA respectively. In presence of RU28362, however, we observed only a single class of binding sites with a Ka of 1.02 X 10(8) M-1 and a Nmax of 90 fmol/mg DNA. Competition studies performed in presence of RU28362 showed that aldosterone was the more effective competitor followed by corticosterone, progesterone, deoxycorticosterone, dexamethasone, cortisol, triamcinolone acetonide and cortisone. The nuclear complexes had a sedimentation coefficient in the area of 8 S which changed to 4-5 S in the presence of 0.4 M KCl. This effect of KCl was prevented by the addition of 10 mM sodium molybdate. Always in the presence of the glucocorticoid analog, by DEAE-c chromatography we observed a major specific aldosterone-binding fraction which was eluted with 0.2 M KCl. This fraction sedimented at 8.4 S in the absence of sodium molybdate and KCl. In the absence of RU28362, DNA-c columns retained only a small portion of the nuclear complexes which were eluted with KCl. These complexes sedimented, on sucrose gradient, at 4.6 and 3.1 S, whereas those which did not bind to DNA-c had a sedimentation coefficient of 8 S. In the presence of RU28362, the majority of bound [3H]aldosterone remained in the column flow-through fraction; when this fraction was further analyzed on DEAE-c, complexes were eluted with 0.2 and 0.3 M KCl. These data indicate that nuclear receptors for aldosterone are present in small number in kidneys of chick embryo and that they are mostly in the 8 S form.