Immunochemical characterization of human lung epoxide hydrolases

Immunochemical techniques were used to investigate the biochemical properties of human lung epoxide hydrolases. Two epoxide hydrolases with different immunoreactive properties were identified. These two epoxide hydrolases were found in both cytosolic and microsomal cell fractions. Immunotitration of enzyme activity showed that enzymes that catalyze the hydration of benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide react with antiserum to rat microsomal epoxide hydrolase; those that hydrate trans-stilbene oxide do not. Immunotitration and Western blot experiments showed that microsomal and cytosolic benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide hydrolases have significant structural homology. Immunohistochemical staining of human lung benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide hydrolase showed that the enzyme is localized primarily in the bronchial epithelium. No cell type-specific localization was observed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed which allows direct quantitation of benzo(a)pyrene 4,5-oxide hydrolase protein. Levels of enzyme protein detected by this assay correlated well with enzyme levels determined by substrate conversion assays.     

Differential response of human and rat epoxide hydrolase to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure: studies using precision-cut tissue slices

The potential of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to modulate microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity, determined using benzo[a]pyrene 5-oxide as substrate, in human liver, was evaluated and compared to rat liver. Precision-cut liver slices prepared from fresh human liver were incubated with six structurally diverse PAHs, at a range of concentrations, for 24 h. Of the six PAHs studied, benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene and fluoranthene gave rise to a statistically significant increase in epoxide hydrolase activity, which was accompanied by a concomitant increase in epoxide hydrolase protein levels determined by immunoblotting. The other PAHs studied, namely dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene and 1-methylphenanthrene, influenced neither activity nor enzyme protein levels. When rat slices were incubated under identical conditions, only benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene elevated epoxide hydrolase activity, which was, once again accompanied by a rise in protein levels. At the mRNA level, however, all six PAHs caused an increase, albeit to different extent. In rat, epoxide hydroxylase activity in lung slices was much lower than in liver slices. In lung slices, epoxide hydrolase activity was elevated following exposure to benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,l]pyrene and, to a lesser extent, 1-methylphenanthrene; similar observations were made at the protein level. At both activity and protein levels extent of induction was far more pronounced in the lung compared with the liver. It is concluded that epoxide hydrolase activity is an inducible enzyme by PAHs, in both human and rat liver, but induction potential by individual PAHs varies enormously, depending on the nature of the compound involved. Marked tissue differences in the nature of PAHs stimulating activity in rat lung and liver were noted. Although in the rat basal lung epoxide hydrolase activity is much lower than liver, it is more markedly inducible by PAHs.     

Differential control of rat microsomal "aryl hydrocarbon" monooxygenase and epoxide hydratase.

A growing body of evidence implicates epoxide metabolites of mutagenic and carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons as either the only species, or one of the contributing species responsible for these adverse effects. Selective induction of epoxide hydratase(s) catalyzing the transformation of epoxides to electrophilically unreactive dihydrodiols, under conditions not leading to increases in monooxygenase(s) responsible for epoxide formation would, therefore, be of interest. All inducers of rat hepatic epoxide hydratase (determined with [7-3H]styrene oxide as substrate) which have been discovered also induced monooxygenase (determined with benzo(a)pyrene as substrate) suggesting a possible common biosynthetic control of these enzymes. The enzyme levels observed in different sexes and at different stages of the ontogenetic development, possibly dependent on endogenous inducers, strengthened this view. No sex difference is epoxide hydratase activity was observed in young rats (1 to 5 days old) while epoxide hydratase levels were about 3-fold higher in adult males than in females, which was remarkably similar to the behavior of monooxygenase. Moreover, the prenatal development of epoxide hydratase and monooxygenase appeared to be similar--although the low enzyme levels precluded accurate determinations of the latter. Although different types of known monooxygenase inducers all led to epoxide hydratase induction in adult rat liver, their effect of epoxide hydratase and monooxygenase could be dissociated by transplacental treatment. Dissociation was clearest with inducers of the polycyclic hydrocarbon type which led to great induction of monooxygenase while epoxide hydratase remained unchanged. The increases in monooxygenase activity were very different when determined by two methods based on different principles, demonstrating that at least two monooxygenases are involved in oxidative metabolism of benzo(a)pyrene, and that the control of epoxide hydratase is not under common control with either of them.     

The effects of metyrapone, chalcone epoxide, benzil, clotrimazole and related compounds on the activity of microsomal epoxide hydrolase in situ, in purified form and in reconstituted systems towards different substrates

The influence of metyrapone, chalcone epoxide, benzil and clotrimazole on the activity of microsomal epoxide hydrolase towards styrene oxide, benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, estroxide and androstene oxide was investigated. The studies were performed using liver microsomes from rats, rabbits, mice and humans; epoxide hydrolase purified from rat liver microsomes to apparent homogeneity; and the purified enzyme incorporated into liposomes composed of egg-yolk phosphatidylcholine or total rat liver microsomal lipids. All four effectors were found to activate the hydrolysis of styrene oxide by epoxide hydrolase in situ in rat liver microsomal membranes, in agreement with earlier findings. Epoxide hydrolase activity towards styrene oxide in liver microsomes from mouse, rabbit and man was also increased by all four effectors. The most striking effect was a 680% activation by clotrimazole in rat liver microsomes. However, none of the effectors activated microsomal epoxide hydrolase more than 50% when benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, estroxide or androstene oxide was used as substrate. Indeed, clotrimazole was found to inhibit microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity towards estroxide 30-50% and towards androstene oxide 60-90%. The effects of these four compounds were found to be virtually identical in the preparations from rats, rabbits, mice and humans. The effects of metyrapone, chalcone epoxide, benzil and clotrimazole on purified epoxide hydrolase were qualitatively the same as those on epoxide hydrolase in intact microsomes, but much smaller in magnitude. These effects were increased in magnitude only slightly by incorporation of the purified enzyme into liposomes made from egg-yolk phosphatidylcholine. However, when incorporation into liposomes composed of total microsomal lipids was performed, the effects seen were essentially of the same magnitude as with intact microsomes. When the extent of activation was plotted against effector concentration, three different patterns were found with different effectors. Activation of epoxide hydrolase activity towards styrene oxide by clotrimazole was found to be uncompetitive with the substrate and highly structure specific. On the other hand, inhibition of epoxide hydrolase activity towards androstene oxide by clotrimazole was found to be competitive in microsomes. It is concluded that the marked effects of these four modulators on microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity are due to an interaction with the enzyme protein itself, but that the presence of total microsomal phospholipids allows the maximal expression leading to similar degrees of modulation as those observed in intact microsomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolases are immunologically distinguishable from each other in the rat and mouse

Antibodies raised to homogeneous rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase were used to distinguish microsomal epoxide hydrolase from epoxide hydrolase of cytosolic origin in mice and rats. Using double diffusion analysis in agarose gels, we show that anti-rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase forms a single precipitin line with solubilized microsomes from rat and mouse liver, but no reaction is seen with the corresponding cytosolic fractions. Rat or mouse microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity (using benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide as substrate) can be completely precipitated out of solubilized preparations by the antibody, which is equipotent against rat and mouse microsomal epoxide hydrolase. No precipitation of cytosolic hydrolase activity (using trans-beta-ethyl styrene oxide as substrate) is seen with any concentration of the antibody tested. Thus, in the case of microsomal epoxide hydrolase, extensive immunological cross-reactivity exists between the two species, rat and mouse. In contrast, no cross-reactivity is detectable between cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolase, even when enzymes from the same species are compared. We conclude that microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activities represent distinct and immunologically non-cross-reactive protein species.     

Comparison of crude and affinity purified cytosolic epoxide hydrolases from hepatic tissue of control and clofibrate-fed mice

An affinity purification procedure was developed for the cytosolic epoxide hydrolase based upon the selective binding of the enzyme to immobilized methoxycitronellyl thiol. Several elution systems were examined, but the most successful system employed selective elution with a chalcone oxide. This affinity system allowed the purification of the cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activity from livers of both control and clofibrate-fed mice. A variety of biochemical techniques including pH dependence, substrate preference, kinetics, inhibition, amino acid analysis, peptide mapping, Western blotting, analytical isoelectric focusing, and gel permeation chromatography failed to distinguish between the enzymes purified from control and clofibrate-fed animals. The quantitative removal of the cytosolic epoxide hydrolase acting on trans-stilbene oxide from 100,000g supernatants, allowed analysis of remaining activities acting differentially on cis-stilbene oxide and benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide. Such analysis indicated the existence of a novel epoxide hydrolase activity in the cytosol of mouse liver preparations.     

Purification of microsomal epoxide hydrolase from liver of rhesus monkey: partial separation of cis- and trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase

Solubilized rhesus monkey liver microsomes were used as the starting material for the purification of epoxide (cis-stilbene oxide) hydrolase. Successive chromatography over DEAE-Sephacel followed by CM-cellulose resulted in two peaks of activity, CM A and CM B. Passage of these two eluates over separate hydroxyapatite columns resulted in two peaks of activity from CM A, HA A1, and HA A2, and one peak from CM B and HA B, with respective recoveries of 1, 7, and 0.2% of cis-stilbene oxide hydrolase activities. A similar recovery was found for benzo[a]pyrene-4,5-oxide hydrolase, while trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase activity coeluted only in HA A2. Fraction HA A1 was homogeneous as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Immunoblots of the three eluates and solubilized microsomes incubated with anti-HA A1 demonstrated a single band at 49 kDa in each fraction. The three eluates were differentially affected by the inhibitors of epoxide hydrolase, trichloropropene oxide and 4-phenylchalcone oxide, and addition of Lubrol PX and phospholipid. Immunoprecipitation of HA A2 resulted in coprecipitation of cis- and trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase activity. Upon immunoprecipitation of solubilized microsomes, all the cis-stilbene oxide and benzo[a]pyrene-4,5-oxide, but only 50-60% of trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase activity was precipitated. These studies support findings with other species that (i) an immunochemically distinct cytosolic-like epoxide hydrolase exists in microsomes, and (ii) microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity can be separated during ion-exchange chromatography giving proteins with similar molecular weights and immunochemical cross-reactivity. The precipitation of cis- and trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase activity in eluate HA A2 provides convincing evidence that these isozymes are not structurally identical.     

Selective inhibition of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activity in vitro by compounds that inhibit catalase

The ability of a number of known inhibitors of catalase activity to affect cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolase activities in vitro, measured as enzymatic trans-stilbene oxide hydrolysis and styrene oxide hydrolysis, respectively, was investigated. Catalase and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activities are inhibited by hydroxylated metabolites of 2-amino-4,5-diphenylthiazole (DPT). The metabolite hydroxylated on the 4-phenyl ring (4OH-DPT) and the metabolite hydroxylated on both phenyl rings (4,5-DIOH-DPT) are potent inhibitors of both enzymes; the metabolite hydroxylated on the 5-phenyl ring (5OH-DPT) is less potent. Unmetabolized DPT has no effect on either enzyme. 4OH-DPT inhibits, but 5OH-DPT enhances, microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity. 4,5-DIOH-DPT and DPT have no effect on this enzyme. Other compounds that inhibit both catalase and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activities, but do not inhibit microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity, are nordihydroguaiaretic acid and 2-aminothiazole. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity is enhanced by 2-aminothiazole and levamisole in vitro. Thus these inhibitors of catalase are selective epoxide hydrolase inhibitors in that they inhibit cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activity in vitro, but have either no effect on, or increase the activity of, microsomal epoxide hydrolase in vitro. Conversely, the selective cytosolic epoxide hydrolase inhibitors 4-phenylchalcone oxide and 4'-phenylchalcone oxide do not inhibit catalase activity, nor does trichloropropene oxide, a selective microsomal epoxide hydrolase inhibitor.     

Senescent changes in rodent hepatic epoxide metabolism

Age-related alterations in epoxide metabolism were examined in subcellular fractions of liver from 3-, 12- and over 24-month-old male rats and mice. Using styrene oxide as the substrate, glutathione-S-transferase activity remained unchanged while the activity of epoxide hydrase increased with age in both species. The microsomally-mediated binding of benzo[a]pyrene to DNA was also increased in the old animals. Thus, senescent rodents retain or increase their ability to metabolize epoxides. The effect on epoxide metabolism of pretreatment of the senescent rodents with polychlorinated biphenyls was also examined. Glutathione-S-transferase activity was induced only in old animals. However, epoxide hydrase activity, while inducible in all age groups of rats, increased only in young mice. Therefore, there is an age-related difference in response of epoxide metabolizing enzymes to polychlorinated biphenyl treatments between rats and mice.     

Purification of human liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and comparison to the microsomal enzyme

Epoxide hydrolase (EC 3.3.2.3) was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity from human liver cytosol by using hydrolytic activity toward trans-8-ethylstyrene 7,8-oxide (TESO) as an assay. The overall purification was 400-fold. The purified enzyme has an apparent monomeric molecular weight of 58 000, significantly greater than the 50 000 found for human (or rat) liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase or for another TESO-hydrolyzing enzyme also isolated from human liver cytosol. Purified cytosolic TESO hydrolase catalyzes the hydrolysis of cis-8-ethylstyrene 7,8-oxide 10 times more rapidly than does the microsomal enzyme, catalyzes the hydrolysis of TESO and trans-stilbene oxide as rapidly as the microsomal enzyme, but catalyzes the hydrolysis of styrene 7,8-oxide, p-nitrostyrene 7,8-oxide, and naphthalene 1,2-oxide much less effectively than does the microsomal enzyme. Purified cytosolic TESO hydrolase does not hydrolyze benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, a substrate for the microsomal enzyme. The activities of the purified enzymes can explain the specific activities observed with subcellular fractions. Anti-human liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase did not recognize cytosolic TESO hydrolase in purified form or in cytosol, as judged by double-diffusion immunoprecipitin analysis, precipitation of enzymatic activity, and immunoelectrophoretic techniques. Cytosolic TESO hydrolase and microsomal epoxide hydrolase were also distinguished by peptide mapping. The results provide evidence that physically different forms of epoxide hydrolase exist in different subcellular fractions and can have markedly different substrate specificities.     

Human liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolases

Human liver epoxide hydrolases were characterized by several criteria and a cytosolic cis-stilbene oxide hydrolase (cEHCSO) was purified to apparent homogeneity. Styrene oxide and five phenylmethyloxiranes were tested as substrates for human liver epoxide hydrolases. With microsomes activity was highest with trans-2-methylstyrene oxide, followed by styrene 7,8-oxide, cis-2-methylstyrene oxide, cis-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide, trans-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide and 2,2-dimethylstyrene oxide. With cytosol the same order was obtained for the first three substrates, whereas activity with 2,2-dimethylstyrene oxide was higher than with cis-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide and no hydrolysis occurred with trans-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide. Generally, activities were lower with cytosol than with microsomes. The isoelectric point for both microsomal styrene 7,8-oxide and cis-stilbene oxide hydrolyzing activity was 7.0, whereas cEHCSO had an isoelectric point of 9.2 and cytosolic trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase (cEHTSO) of 5.7. The cytosolic epoxide hydrolases could be separated by anion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration. The latter technique revealed a higher molecular mass for cEHCSO than for cEHTSO. Both cytosolic epoxide hydrolases showed higher activities at pH 7.4 than at pH 9.0, whereas the opposite was true for microsomal epoxide hydrolase. The effects of ethanol, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, acetone and dimethylsulfoxide on microsomal epoxide hydrolase depended on the substrate tested, whereas both cytosolic enzymes were not at all, or only slightly, affected by these solvents. Effects of different enzyme modulators on microsomal epoxide hydrolase also depended on the substrates used. Trichloropropene oxide and styrene 7,8-oxide strongly inhibited cEHCSO whereas cEHTSO was moderately affected by these compounds. Immunochemical investigations revealed a close relationship between cEHCSO and rat liver microsomal, but not cytosolic, epoxide hydrolase. Interestingly, cEHTSO has no immunological relationship to rat microsomal, nor to rat cytosolic epoxide hydrolase. cEHTSO from human liver differed also from its counterpart in the rat in that it was only moderately affected by tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile and trichloropropene oxide. Five steps were necessary to purify cEHCSO. The enzyme has a molecular mass (49 kDa) identical to that of rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase.     

Antimutagenesis by shift in monooxygenase isoenzymes and induction of epoxide hydrolase

The widely occurring aromatic and olefinic structural elements can be transformed into epoxides by microsomal monooxygenases. These epoxides may react with nucleophilic centers in the cell and thereby covalently bind to DNA, RNA and protein. Such a reaction may lead to cytotoxicity, allergy, mutagenicity and/or carcinogenicity, depending on the properties of the epoxide in question. An important contributing factor is the presence and relative activity of enzymes controlling the concentration of such epoxides. There are several microsomal monooxygenases which differ in activity and substrate specificity. On individual substrates individual cytochromes P-450 often preferentially attack at one specific site different from that attacked by others. Some of these pathways lead to reactive products, others are detoxification pathways. Also important are the enzymes which metabolize epoxides, such as epoxide hydrolases and glutathione transferases. Such enzymes can act as inactivating and in some specific cases also as co-activating enzymes. Moreover, precursor-sequestering enzymes such as dihydrodiol dehydrogenase, glucuronosyl transferases and sulfotransferases are important for the control of reactive epoxides. These enzymes themselves are subject to control by many endogenous and exogenous factors. By virtue of their contribution to the control of mutagenic metabolites such modulators can exert antimutagenic activity. An especially interesting antimutagen, whose mechanism of antimutagenic action is modulation of mutagen-metabolizing enzymes, is trans-stilbene oxide. This agent selectively induces the synthesis of some specific cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes at the expense of others, so that the metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene is shifted from the route leading to the highly mutagenic 7,8-dihydrodiol 9,10-epoxides to the route leading to the much less mutagenic 4,5-epoxide. Moreover, the same agent potently induces microsomal epoxide hydrolase which inactivates the latter epoxide. The combined effects lead to a drastic antimutagenic effect, the molecular mechanism of which is given by these changes in mutagen-metabolizing enzymes.     

Cytosolic epoxide hydrolase

Epoxide hydrolase activity is recovered in the high-speed supernatant fraction from the liver of all mammals so far examined, including man. For some as yet unexplained reason, the rat has a very low level of this activity, so that cytosolic epoxide hydrolase is generally studied in mice. This enzyme selectively hydrolyzes trans epoxides, thereby complementing the activity of microsomal epoxide hydrolase, for which cis epoxides are better substrates. Cytosolic epoxide hydrolase has been purified to homogeneity from the livers of mice, rabbits and humans. Certain of the physicochemical and enzymatic properties of the mouse enzyme have been thoroughly characterized. Neither the primary amino acid, cDNA nor gene sequences for this protein are yet known, but such characterization is presently in progress. Unlike microsomal epoxide hydrolase and most other enzymes involved in xenobiotic metabolism, cytosolic epoxide hydrolase is not induced by treatment of rodents with substances such as phenobarbital, 2-acetylaminofluorene, trans-stilbene oxide, or butylated hydroxyanisole. The only xenobiotics presently known to induce cytosolic epoxide hydrolase are substances which also cause peroxisome proliferation, e.g., clofibrate, nafenopin and phthalate esters. These and other observations indicate that this enzyme may actually be localized in peroxisomes in vivo and is recovered in the high-speed supernatant because of fragmentation of these fragile organelles during homogenization, i.e., recovery of this enzyme in the cytosolic fraction is an artefact. The functional significance of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase is still largely unknown. In addition to deactivating xenobiotic epoxides to which the organism is exposed directly or which are produced during xenobiotic metabolism, primarily by the cytochrome P-450 system, this enzyme may be involved in cellular defenses against oxidative stress.     

Effect of purified epoxide hydrolase on metabolic activa-tion and binding of benzo(a)pyrene to exogenous DNA. Shift of the activation pathway

The effect of purified epoxide hydrolase (E.C. 3.3.2.3) on the binding of benzo(a)pyrene metabolites 9-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene and 7,8-dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene to DNA catalyzed by cytochrome P 448 from liver microsomes of methylcholanthrene pretreated rats has been investigated. The total binding and the major binding species derived from 9-hydroxybenzo(a)pyrene were strongly inhibited by the presence of purified epoxide hydrolase and the species derived from 7,8-dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene was slightly increased. By modifying the balance between cytochrome P 448 and epoxide hydrolase it is possible to shift quantitatively the binding of these two main reactive intermediates to DNA.     

Properties of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase purified from the liver of untreated and clofibrate-treated mice. Characterization of optimal assay conditions, substrate specificity and effects of modulators on the catalytic activity

We have characterized certain catalytic properties of cytosolic epoxide hydrolases purified from untreated and clofibrate-treated mouse liver. The enzyme activity was found to be sensitive to oxygen, but nitrogen-saturated buffers containing dithiothreitol maintained high activity for at least 12 h at 0 degrees C. Linearity of the hydration of trans-stilbene oxide with time and protein was established, the pH optimum was broad (6.5 to 7.4) and the temperature optimum was close to 50 degrees C for both forms. The activity was independent of ionic strength, with the exception of the control form in the absence of dithiothreitol, where a lower activity was observed at low ionic strength. The activity decreased when ethanol was replaced by acetone or acetonitrile as solvent for the substrate. Tetrahydrofuran was found to be highly inhibitory, while dimethylsulfoxide had less pronounced effects. The apparent Km values were 4.9 microM, 73 microM and 1980 microM for the control form with trans-stilbene oxide, cis-stilbene oxide and styrene oxide as substrates, respectively. The Km values for the enzyme from clofibrate-treated mice were in the same range, although the V values were higher for all three substrates with this form. The highest turnover was found for trans-beta-propylstyrene oxide as substrate, followed by trans-beta-ethylstyrene oxide. Little or no activity was observed with benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide or cholesterol 5,6 alpha-oxide. The enzymes were found to be sensitive to 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) and a phenylmercuric salt. alpha-Naphthoflavone, beta-naphthoflavone and chalcone derivatives also inhibited the activity, while none of the compounds known to activate microsomal epoxide hydrolase activated the cytosolic forms.     

Covalent attachment of epoxide hydrolase to dextran

Epoxide hydrolase (EC 3.3.2.3) purified from rat liver microsomes has been immobilized by covalent linking to dextran activated by imidazolyl carbamate groups, under mild conditions. K^app_m values of free and dextran bound epoxide hydrolase toward benzo(a)pyrene-4,5-oxide were 0.5 and 0.35 μM respectively, while V^app_max was lowered from 300 to 120 nmol min^?1mg^?1protein. The activity lost upon coupling could not be restored by digestion of the support by dextranase (1,6-α-d-glucan 6-glucanohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.11) treatment. This fact, along with the similarity of the activation energy values for both native and bound epoxide hydrolase, indicated that steric hindrance effects due to the polymer support played only a minor role in this loss of activity. Evidences of changes in the conformation of epoxide hydrolase were obtained by a comparative study of u.v. circular dichroism and tryptophan fluorescence emission spectra of the native and dextran bound enzymes. On the other hand, the enzyme conjugate showed greater resistance than the free enzyme to thermal inactivation.     

Microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases, the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation system and catalase. Activities, distribution and induction in rat liver parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells

A number of structurally unrelated hypolipidaemic agents and certain phthalate-ester plasticizers induce hepatomegaly and proliferation of peroxisomes in rodent liver, but there is relatively limited data regarding the specific effects of these drugs on liver non-parenchymal cells. In the present study, liver parenchymal, Kupffer and endothelial cells from untreated and fenofibrate-fed rats were isolated and the activities of two enzymes associated with peroxisomes (catalase and the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation system) as well as cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolase were measured. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase, cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and catalase activities were 7-12-fold higher in parenchymal cells than in Kupffer or endothelial cells from untreated rats; the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation activity was only detected in parenchymal cells. Fenofibrate increased catalase, cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation activities in parenchymal cells by about 1.5-, 3.5- and 20-fold, respectively. The induction of catalase (2-3-fold) and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase (3-5-fold) was also observed in Kupffer and endothelial cells; furthermore, a low peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation activity was detected in endothelial cells. Morphological examination by electron microscopy showed that peroxisomes were confined to liver parenchymal cells in untreated animals, but could also be observed in endothelial cells after administration of fenofibrate.     

Expression of microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in cultured rat hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines

Microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity, determined using benzpyrene 4,5-oxide and styrene 7,8-oxide, increased in cultured hepatocytes compared to freshly isolated cells. In contrast, cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activity, assayed using trans-stilbene oxide, had decreased 80% by 24 hr and was barely detectable after 96 hr in culture. There was no difference in enzyme activity between freshly isolated hepatocytes and the two rat hepatoma cell lines McA-RH 7777 and H4-II-E, when styrene 7,8-oxide was used as substrate. However, benzpyrene 4,5-oxide hydrolase activity of the McA-RH 7777 and H4-II-E cell lines were 55 and 10%, respectively, of freshly isolated hepatocytes. These results show that hepatoma cell lines provide a suitable system for studying the regulation of both the microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase enzymes.     

Metabolic activation of benzo(a)pyrene by human amniotic fluid

The in vitro activation of benzo(a)pyrene was studied in amniotic fluid from ten 4-month pregnant women. Benzo(a)pyrene monooxygenase and epoxide hydrolase activities were in the same range in amniotic fluid as in human liver. Glutathione epoxide transferase activity was markedly lower than in hepatocytes. Human amniotic fluid also catalyzed the formation of hydrocarbon metabolites mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium TA98 (Ames system). Profiles of amniotic fluid aromatic hydrocarbons from non smokers exhibited low benzo(a)pyrene concentration (less than 0.1 ng/ml).