Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA

SurA is thought to be the most important periplasmic chaperone for outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis. Its structure is composed of a core region and two peptidylprolyl isomerase domains, termed P1 and P2, connected by flexible linkers. As such these three independent folding units are able to adopt a number of distinct spatial positions with respect to each other. The conformational dynamics of these domains are thought to be functionally important yet are largely unresolved. Here we address this question of the conformational ensemble using sedimentation equilibrium, small‐angle neutron scattering, and folding titrations. This combination of orthogonal methods converges on a SurA population that is monomeric at physiological concentrations. The conformation that dominates this population has the P1 and core domains docked to one another, for example, “P1‐closed” and the P2 domain extended in solution. We discovered that the distribution of domain orientations is defined by modest and favorable interactions between the core domain and either the P1 or the P2 domains. These two peptidylprolyl domains compete with each other for core‐binding but are thermodynamically uncoupled. This arrangement implies two novel insights. Firstly, an open conformation must exist to facilitate P1 and P2 exchange on the core, indicating that the open client‐binding conformation is populated at low levels even in the absence of client unfolded OMPs. Secondly, competition between P1 and P2 binding paradoxically occludes the client binding site on the core, which may serve to preserve the reservoir of binding‐competent apo‐SurA in the periplasm.     

Plasticity and transient binding are key ingredients of the periplasmic chaperone network

SurA, Skp, FkpA, and DegP constitute a chaperone network that ensures biogenesis of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in Gram‐negative bacteria. Both Skp and FkpA are holdases that prevent the self‐aggregation of unfolded OMPs, whereas SurA accelerates folding and DegP is a protease. None of these chaperones is essential, and we address here how functional plasticity is manifested in nine known null strains. Using a comprehensive computational model of this network termed OMPBioM, our results suggest that a threshold level of steady state holdase occupancy by chaperones is required, but the cell is agnostic to the specific holdase molecule fulfilling this function. In addition to its foldase activity, SurA moonlights as a holdase when there is no expression of Skp and FkpA. We further interrogate the importance of chaperone–client complex lifetime by conducting simulations using lifetime values for Skp complexes that range in length by six orders of magnitude. This analysis suggests that transient occupancy of durations much shorter than the Escherichia coli doubling time is required. We suggest that fleeting chaperone occupancy facilitates rapid sampling of the periplasmic conditions, which ensures that the cell can be adept at responding to environmental changes. Finally, we calculated the network effects of adding multivalency by computing populations that include two Skp trimers per unfolded OMP. We observe only modest perturbations to the system. Overall, this quantitative framework of chaperone–protein interactions in the periplasm demonstrates robust plasticity due to its dynamic binding and unbinding behavior.     

The periplasmic molecular chaperone protein SurA binds a peptide motif that is characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins

The Escherichia coli SurA protein is a periplasmic molecular chaperone that facilitates correct folding of outer membrane porins. The peptide binding specificity of SurA has been characterized using phage display of heptameric peptides of random sequence. The consensus binding pattern of aromatic-polar-aromatic-nonpolar-proline amino acids emerges for both SurA and a SurA "core domain," which remains after deletion of a peripheral peptidyl-proline isomerase domain. Isothermal titration calorimetry with a high affinity heptameric peptide of sequence WEYIPNV yields peptide affinities in the range of 1-14 microm for both SurA and its core domain. Although the peptide consensus aromatic-polar-aromatic-nonpolar-proline occurs infrequently in E. coli proteins, the less restrictive tripeptide motif aromatic-random-aromatic appears with greater-than-random frequency in outer membrane proteins and is prevalent in the "aromatic bands" of the porin beta barrel structures. Thus, SurA recognizes a peptide motif that is characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins.     

The periplasmic chaperone SurA exploits two features characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins for selective substrate recognition

The Escherichia coli periplasmic chaperone and peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) SurA facilitates the maturation of outer membrane porins. Although the PPIase activity exhibited by one of its two parvulin-like domains is dispensable for this function, the chaperone activity residing in the non-PPIase regions of SurA, a sizable N-terminal domain and a short C-terminal tail, is essential. Unlike most cytoplasmic chaperones SurA is selective for particular substrates and recognizes outer membrane porins synthesized in vitro much more efficiently than other proteins. Thus, SurA may be specialized for the maturation of outer membrane proteins. We have characterized the substrate specificity of SurA based on its natural, biologically relevant substrates by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries representing outer membrane proteins. We show that two features are critical for peptide binding by SurA: specific patterns of aromatic residues and the orientation of their side chains, which are found more frequently in integral outer membrane proteins than in other proteins. For the first time this sufficiently explains the capability of SurA to discriminate between outer membrane protein and non-outer membrane protein folding intermediates. Furthermore, peptide binding by SurA requires neither an active PPIase domain nor the presence of proline, indicating that the observed substrate specificity relates to the chaperone function of SurA. Finally, we show that SurA is capable of associating with the outer membrane. Together, our data support a model in which SurA is specialized to interact with non-native periplasmic outer membrane protein folding intermediates and to assist in their maturation from early to late outer membrane-associated steps.     

Dissecting the Escherichia coli periplasmic chaperone network using differential proteomics

β-Barrel proteins, or outer membrane proteins (OMPs), perform many essential functions in Gram-negative bacteria, but questions remain about the mechanism by which they are assembled into the outer membrane (OM). In Escherichia coli, β-barrels are escorted across the periplasm by chaperones, most notably SurA and Skp. However, the contributions of these two chaperones to the assembly of the OM proteome remained unclear. We used differential proteomics to determine how the elimination of Skp and SurA affects the assembly of many OMPs. We have shown that removal of Skp has no impact on the levels of the 63 identified OM proteins. However, depletion of SurA in the skp strain has a marked impact on the OM proteome, diminishing the levels of almost all β-barrel proteins. Our results are consistent with a model in which SurA plays a primary chaperone role in E. coli. Furthermore, they suggest that while no OMPs prefer the Skp chaperone pathway in wild-type cells, most can use Skp efficiently when SurA is absent. Our data, which provide a unique glimpse into the protein content of the nonviable surA skp mutant, clarify the roles of the periplasmic chaperones in E. coli.     

Insights into the Function and Structural Flexibility of the Periplasmic Molecular Chaperone SurA

SurA is the primary periplasmic molecular chaperone that facilitates the folding and assembling of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in Gram-negative bacteria. Deletion of the surA gene in Escherichia coli leads to a decrease in outer membrane density and an increase in bacterial drug susceptibility. Here, we conducted mutational studies on SurA to identify residues that are critical for function. One mutant, SurA_V37G, significantly reduced the activity of SurA. Further characterization indicated that SurA_V37G was structurally similar to, but less stable than, the wild-type protein. The loss of activity in SurA_V37G could be restored through the introduction of a pair of Cys residues and the subsequent formation of a disulfide bond. Inspired by this success, we created three additional SurA constructs, each containing a disulfide bond at different regions of the protein between two rigid secondary structural elements. The formation of disulfide bond in these mutants has no observable detrimental effect on protein activity, indicating that SurA does not undergo large-scale conformational change while performing its function.     

The Role of SurA PPIase Domains in Preventing Aggregation of the Outer-Membrane Proteins tOmpA and OmpT

SurA is a conserved ATP-independent periplasmic chaperone involved in the biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins (OMPs). Escherichia coli SurA has a core domain and two peptidylprolyl isomerase (PPIase) domains, the role(s) of which remain unresolved. Here we show that while SurA homologues in early proteobacteria typically contain one or no PPIase domains, the presence of two PPIase domains is common in SurA in later proteobacteria, implying an evolutionary advantage for this domain architecture. Bioinformatics analysis of > 350,000 OMP sequences showed that their length, hydrophobicity and aggregation propensity are similar across the proteobacterial classes, ruling out a simple correlation between SurA domain architecture and these properties of OMP sequences. To investigate the role of the PPIase domains in SurA activity, we deleted one or both PPIase domains from E. coli SurA and investigated the ability of the resulting proteins to bind and prevent the aggregation of tOmpA (19 kDa) and OmpT (33 kDa). The results show that wild-type SurA inhibits the aggregation of both OMPs, as do the cytoplasmic OMP chaperones trigger factor and SecB. However, while the ability of SurA to bind and prevent tOmpA aggregation does not depend on its PPIase domains, deletion of even a single PPIase domain ablates the ability of SurA to prevent OmpT aggregation. The results demonstrate that the core domain of SurA endows its generic chaperone ability, while the presence of PPIase domains enhances its chaperone activity for specific OMPs, suggesting one reason for the conservation of multiple PPIase domains in SurA in proteobacteria.     

The crystal structure of the leptospiral hypothetical protein LIC12922 reveals homology with the periplasmic chaperone SurA

Leptospirosis is a world spread zoonosis caused by members of the genus Leptospira. Although leptospires were identified as the causal agent of leptospirosis almost 100 years ago, little is known about their biology, which hinders the development of new treatment and prevention strategies. One of the several aspects of the leptospiral biology not yet elucidated is the process by which outer membrane proteins (OMPs) traverse the periplasm and are inserted into the outer membrane. The crystal structure determination of the conserved hypothetical protein LIC12922 from Leptospira interrogans revealed a two domain protein homologous to the Escherichia coli periplasmic chaperone SurA. The LIC12922 NC-domain is structurally related to the chaperone modules of E. coli SurA and trigger factor, whereas the parvulin domain is devoid of peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity. Phylogenetic analyses suggest a relationship between LIC12922 and the chaperones PrsA, PpiD and SurA. Based on our structural and evolutionary analyses, we postulate that LIC12922 is a periplasmic chaperone involved in OMPs biogenesis in Leptospira spp. Since LIC12922 homologs were identified in all spirochetal genomes sequenced to date, this assumption may have implications for the OMPs biogenesis studies not only in leptospires but in the entire Phylum Spirochaetes.     

The fimbrial usher FimD follows the SurA-BamB pathway for its assembly in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli

Fimbrial ushers are the largest β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) known to date, which function in the polymerization of fimbriae and their translocation to the bacterial surface. Folding and assembly of these complex OMPs are not characterized. Here, we investigate the role of periplasmic chaperones (SurA, Skp, DegP, and FkpA) and individual components of the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex (BamA, BamB, BamC, and BamE) in the folding of the Escherichia coli FimD usher. The FimD level is dramatically reduced (～30-fold) in a surA null mutant, but a strong cell envelope stress is constitutively activated with upregulation of DegP (～10-fold). To demonstrate a direct role of SurA, FimD folding was analyzed in a conditional surA mutant in which SurA expression was controlled. In this strain, FimD is depleted from bacteria in parallel to SurA without significant upregulation of DegP. Interestingly, the dependency on SurA is higher for FimD than for other OMPs. We also demonstrate that a functional BAM complex is needed for folding of FimD. In addition, FimD levels were strongly reduced (～5-fold) in a mutant lacking the accessory lipoprotein BamB. The critical role of BamB for FimD folding was confirmed by complementation and BamB depletion experiments. Similar to SurA dependency, FimD showed a stronger dependency on BamB than OMPs. On the other hand, folding of FimD was only marginally affected in bamC and bamE mutants. Collectively, our results indicate that FimD usher follows the SurA-BamB pathway for its assembly. The preferential use of this pathway for the folding of OMPs with large β-barrels is discussed.     

The periplasmic bacterial molecular chaperone SurA adapts its structure to bind peptides in different conformations to assert a sequence preference for aromatic residues

The periplasmic molecular chaperone protein SurA facilitates correct folding and maturation of outer membrane proteins in Gram-negative bacteria. It preferentially binds peptides that have a high fraction of aromatic amino acids. Phage display selections, isothermal titration calorimetry and crystallographic structure determination have been used to elucidate the basis of the binding specificity. The peptide recognition is imparted by the first peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) domain of SurA. Crystal structures of complexes between peptides of sequence WEYIPNV and NFTLKFWDIFRK with the first PPIase domain of the Escherichia coli SurA protein at 1.3 A resolution, and of a complex between the dodecapeptide and a SurA fragment lacking the second PPIase domain at 3.4 A resolution, have been solved. SurA binds as a monomer to the heptapeptide in an extended conformation. It binds as a dimer to the dodecapeptide in an alpha-helical conformation, predicated on a substantial structural rearrangement of the SurA protein. In both cases, side-chains of aromatic residues of the peptides contribute a large fraction of the binding interactions. SurA therefore asserts a recognition preference for aromatic amino acids in a variety of sequence configurations by adopting alternative tertiary and quaternary structures to bind peptides in different conformations.     

Crystallographic structure of SurA, a molecular chaperone that facilitates folding of outer membrane porins

The SurA protein facilitates correct folding of outer membrane proteins in gram-negative bacteria. The sequence of Escherichia coli SurA presents four segments, two of which are peptidyl-prolyl isomerases (PPIases); the crystal structure reveals an asymmetric dumbbell, in which the amino-terminal, carboxy-terminal, and first PPIase segments of the sequence form a core structural module, and the second PPIase segment is a satellite domain tethered approximately 30 A from this module. The core module, which is implicated in membrane protein folding, has a novel fold that includes an extended crevice. Crystal contacts show that peptides bind within the crevice, suggesting a model for chaperone activity whereby segments of polypeptide may be repetitively sequestered and released during the membrane protein-folding process.     

Dissection of β‐barrel outer membrane protein assembly pathways through characterizing BamA POTRA 1 mutants of Escherichia coli

BamA of Escherichia coli is an essential component of the hetero‐oligomeric machinery that mediates β‐barrel outer membrane protein (OMP) assembly. The C‐ and N‐termini of BamA fold into trans‐membrane β‐barrel and five soluble POTRA domains respectively. Detailed characterization of BamA POTRA 1 missense and deletion mutants revealed two competing OMP assembly pathways, one of which is followed by the archetypal trimeric β‐barrel OMPs, OmpF and LamB, and is dependent on POTRA 1. Interestingly, our data suggest that BamA also requires its POTRA 1 domain for proper assembly. The second pathway is independent of POTRA 1 and is exemplified by TolC. Site‐specific cross‐linking analysis revealed that the POTRA 1 domain of BamA interacts with SurA, a periplasmic chaperone required for the assembly of OmpF and LamB, but not that of TolC and BamA. The data suggest that SurA and BamA POTRA 1 domain function in concert to assist folding and assembly of most β‐barrel OMPs except for TolC, which folds into a unique soluble α‐helical barrel and an OM‐anchored β‐barrel. The two assembly pathways finally merge at some step beyond POTRA 1 but presumably before membrane insertion, which is thought to be catalysed by the trans‐membrane β‐barrel domain of BamA.     

Interaction between bacterial outer membrane proteins and periplasmic quality control factors: a kinetic partitioning mechanism

The OMPs (outer membrane proteins) of Gram-negative bacteria have to be translocated through the periplasmic space before reaching their final destination. The aqueous environment of the periplasmic space and high permeability of the outer membrane engender such a translocation process inevitably challenging. In Escherichia coli, although SurA, Skp and DegP have been identified to function in translocating OMPs across the periplasm, their precise roles and their relationship remain to be elucidated. In the present paper, by using fluorescence resonance energy transfer and single-molecule detection, we have studied the interaction between the OMP OmpC and these periplasmic quality control factors. The results of the present study reveal that the binding rate of OmpC to SurA or Skp is much faster than that to DegP, which may lead to sequential interaction between OMPs and different quality control factors. Such a kinetic partitioning mechanism for the chaperone-substrate interaction may be essential for the quality control of the biogenesis of OMPs.     

Conserved substrate binding by chaperones in the bacterial periplasm and the mitochondrial intermembrane space

Mitochondria were derived from intracellular bacteria and the mitochondrial intermembrane space is topologically equivalent to the bacterial periplasm. Both compartments contain ATP-independent chaperones involved in the transport of hydrophobic membrane proteins. The mitochondrial TIM (translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane) 10 complex and the periplasmic chaperone SurA were examined in terms of evolutionary relation, structural similarity, substrate binding specificity and their function in transporting polypeptides for insertion into membranes. The two chaperones are evolutionarily unrelated; structurally, they are also distinct both in their characteristics, as determined by SAXS (small-angle X-ray scattering), and in pairwise structural comparison using the distance matrix alignment (DALILite server). Despite their structural differences, SurA and the TIM10 complex share a common binding specificity in Pepscan assays of substrate proteins. Comprehensive analysis of the binding on a total of 1407 immobilized 13-mer peptides revealed that the TIM10 complex, like SurA, does not bind hydrophobic peptides generally, but that both chaperones display selectivity for peptides rich in aromatic residues and with net positive charge. This common binding specificity was not sufficient for SurA to completely replace TIM10 in yeast cells in vivo. In yeast cells lacking TIM10, when SurA is targeted to the intermembrane space of mitochondria, it binds translocating substrate proteins, but fails to completely transfer the substrate to the translocase in the mitochondrial inner membrane. We suggest that SurA was incapable of presenting substrates effectively to the primitive TOM (translocase of the mitochondrial outer membrane) and TIM complexes in early mitochondria, and was replaced by the more effective small Tim chaperone.     

Interplay of protein primary sequence,lipid membrane,and chaperone in β‐barrel assembly

The outer membrane of a Gram‐negative bacterium is a crucial barrier between the external environment and its internal physiology. This barrier is bridged selectively by β‐barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs). The in vivo folding and biogenesis of OMPs necessitates the assistance of the outer membrane chaperone BamA. Nevertheless, OMPs retain the ability of independent self‐assembly in vitro. Hence, it is unclear whether substrate–chaperone dynamics is influenced by the intrinsic ability of OMPs to fold, the magnitude of BamA–OMP interdependence, and the contribution of BamA to the kinetics of OMP assembly. We addressed this by monitoring the assembly kinetics of multiple 8‐stranded β‐barrel OMP substrates with(out) BamA. We also examined whether BamA is species‐specific, or nonspecifically accelerates folding kinetics of substrates from independent species. Our findings reveal BamA as a substrate‐independent promiscuous molecular chaperone, which assists the unfolded OMP to overcome the kinetic barrier imposed by the bilayer membrane. We additionally show that while BamA kinetically accelerates OMP folding, the OMP primary sequence remains a vital deciding element in its assembly rate. Our study provides unexpected insights on OMP assembly and the functional relevance of BamA in vivo.     

Identification of FkpA as a Key Quality Control Factor for the Biogenesis of Outer Membrane Proteins under Heat Shock Conditions

The outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Gram-negative bacterial cells, as well as the mitochondrion and chloroplast organelles, possess unique and highly stable β-barrel structures. Biogenesis of OMPs in Escherichia coli involves such periplasmic chaperones as SurA and Skp. In this study, we found that the ΔsurA Δskp double-deletion strain of E. coli, although lethal and defective in the biogenesis of OMPs at the normal growth temperature, is viable and effective at the heat shock temperature. We identified FkpA as the multicopy suppressor for the lethal phenotype of the ΔsurA Δskp strain. We also demonstrated that the deletion of fkpA from the ΔsurA cells resulted in only a mild decrease in the levels of folded OMPs at the normal temperature but a severe decrease as well as lethality at the heat shock temperature, whereas the deletion of fkpA from the Δskp cells had no detectable effect on OMP biogenesis at either temperature. These results strongly suggest a functional redundancy between FkpA and SurA for OMP biogenesis under heat shock stress conditions. Mechanistically, we found that FkpA becomes a more efficient chaperone for OMPs under the heat shock condition, with increases in both binding rate and affinity. In light of these observations and earlier reports, we propose a temperature-responsive OMP biogenesis mechanism in which the degrees of functional importance of the three chaperones are such that SurA > Skp > FkpA at the normal temperature but FkpA ≥ SurA > Skp at the heat shock temperature.     

Role for Skp in LptD Assembly in Escherichia coli

The periplasmic chaperone Skp has long been implicated in the assembly of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in Escherichia coli. It has been shown to interact with unfolded OMPs, and the simultaneous loss of Skp and the main periplasmic chaperone in E. coli, SurA, results in synthetic lethality. However, a Δskp mutant displays only minor OMP assembly defects, and no OMPs have been shown to require Skp for their assembly. Here, we report a role for Skp in the assembly of the essential OMP LptD. This role may be compensated for by other OMP assembly proteins; in the absence of both Skp and FkpA or Skp and BamB, LptD assembly is impaired. Overexpression of SurA does not restore LptD levels in a Δskp ΔfkpA double mutant, nor does the overexpression of Skp or FkpA restore LptD levels in the ΔsurA mutant, suggesting that Skp acts in concert with SurA to efficiently assemble LptD in E. coli. Other OMPs, including LamB, are less affected in the Δskp ΔfkpA and Δskp bamB::kan double mutants, suggesting that Skp is specifically necessary for the assembly of certain OMPs. Analysis of an OMP with a domain structure similar to that of LptD, FhuA, suggests that common structural features may determine which OMPs require Skp for their assembly.     

Characterization of the first planctomycetal outer membrane protein identifies a channel in the outer membrane of the anammox bacterium Kuenenia stuttgartiensis

Planctomycetes are a bacterial phylum known for their complex intracellular compartmentalization. While most Planctomycetes have two compartments, the anaerobic ammonium oxidizing (anammox) bacteria contain three membrane-enclosed compartments. In contrast to a long-standing consensus, recent insights suggested the outermost Planctomycete membrane to be similar to a Gram-negative outer membrane (OM). One characteristic component that differentiates OMs from cytoplasmic membranes (CMs) is the presence of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) featuring a β-barrel structure that facilitates passage of molecules through the OM. Although proteomic and genomic evidence suggested the presence of OMPs in several Planctomycetes, no experimental verification existed of the pore-forming function and localization of these proteins in the outermost membrane of these exceptional microorganisms. Here, we show via lipid bilayer assays that at least two typical OMP-like channel-forming proteins are present in membrane preparations of the anammox bacterium Kuenenia stuttgartiensis. One of these channel-forming proteins, the highly abundant putative OMP Kustd1878, was purified to homogeneity. Analysis of the channel characteristics via lipid bilayer assays showed that Kustd1878 forms a moderately cation-selective channel with a high current noise and an average single-channel conductance of about 170–190 pS in 1 M KCl. Antibodies were raised against the purified protein and immunogold localization indicated Kustd1878 to be present in the outermost membrane. Therefore, this work clearly demonstrates the presence of OMPs in anammox Planctomycetes and thus firmly adds to the emerging view that Planctomycetes have a Gram-negative cell envelope.     

PpiD is a player in the network of periplasmic chaperones in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>

Background  

The inner membrane-anchored periplasmic folding factor PpiD is described as a parvulin-like peptidyl prolyl isomerase (PPIase) that assists in the maturation of the major beta-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of Escherichia coli. More recent work however, calls these findings into question. Here, we re-examined the role of PpiD in the E. coli periplasm by analyzing its functional interplay with other folding factors that influence OMP maturation as well as general protein folding in the periplasmic compartment of the cell, such as SurA, Skp, and DegP.     

Substitutions in the BamA β-barrel domain overcome the conditional lethal phenotype of a ΔbamB ΔbamE strain of Escherichia coli

BamA interacts with the BamBCDE lipoproteins, and together they constitute the essential β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) of Escherichia coli. The simultaneous absence of BamB and BamE confers a conditional lethal phenotype and a severe β-barrel outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis defect. Without BamB and BamE, wild-type BamA levels are significantly reduced, and the folding of the BamA β-barrel, as assessed by the heat-modifiability assay, is drastically compromised. Single-amino-acid substitutions in the β-barrel domain of BamA improve both bacterial growth and OMP biogenesis in a bamB bamE mutant and restore BamA levels close to the BamB(+) BamE(+) level. The substitutions alter BamA β-barrel folding, and folding in the mutants becomes independent of BamB and BamE. Remarkably, BamA β-barrel alterations also improve OMP biogenesis in cells lacking the major periplasmic chaperone, SurA, which, together with BamB, is thought to facilitate the transfer of partially folded OMPs to the soluble POTRA (polypeptide-transport-associated) domain of BamA. Unlike the bamB bamE mutant background, the absence of BamB or SurA does not affect BamA β-barrel folding. Thus, substitutions in the outer membrane-embedded BamA β-barrel domain overcome OMP biogenesis defects that occur at the POTRA domain of BamA in the periplasm. Based on the structure of FhaC, the altered BamA residues are predicted to lie on a highly conserved loop that folds inside the β-barrel and in regions pointing outside the β-barrel, suggesting that they influence BamA function by both direct and indirect mechanisms.