正常与异常核型人类胚胎干细胞体外分化不同时期基因表达的异同

目的:研究正常核型和异常核型人胚胎干细胞(hESC)基因的表达异同.方法:实时荧光相对定量PCR检测两株正常核型(46,XX)及一株平衡易位13三体核型和一株三倍体核型hESC在体外自体分化不同时期X连锁基因PGK1、抑癌基因RBBP7及癌症基因GPC4的表达情况,并比较分化后不同时期、不同核型对父系印迹基因H19、IGF2R,母系印迹基因SNRPN及多能性调控基因OCT4、NANOG的影响.结果:随着分化时间的增加:①正常和异常核型hESC的PGK1均上调表达;②异常核型hESC抑癌基因RBBP7及癌症基因GPC4相对正常核型hESC呈现明显上调表达;③正常和异常核型hESC中印迹基因表达基本一致:H19、IGF2R上调而SNRPN表达变化不明显或下调;④多能性调控基因OCT4、NANOG在正常核型hESC中较在异常核型hESC中表达明显下降.结论:X连锁基因PGK1、印迹基因在hESC的发育过程中能维持正常调节而不受核型的影响.异常核型hESC抑癌基因、癌症基因在发育过程中的表达上调表明此种细胞具有更危险的发育前景,同时多能性基因在分化后仍能检出表明此种细胞分化能力较正常细胞弱.     

Zfx基因与干细胞自我更新

干细胞具有自我更新保持不分化状态的特性,不同的干细胞具有不同的自我更新机制. Zfx基因(zinc fin ger-X gene)在部分胚胎干细胞和造血干细胞中高表达,该基因高表达有利于胚胎干细胞和造血干细胞自我更新; Zfx基因表达不足或缺乏的胚胎干细胞和造血干细胞自我更新的能力下降,细胞凋亡明显增加.在胚胎干细胞和造血干细胞中发现一些Zfx基因直接调控的靶基因,Zfx 基因可能是控制各种干细胞自我更新的共同的分子机制. Zfx基因表达不足不影响胚胎干细胞和造血干细胞的分化,缺乏 Zfx基因的胚胎干细胞和造血干细胞能够正常分化为各自的功能细胞.     

Activin A和Lefty A对人胚胎干细胞生长的影响

目的探讨TGF-β/Activin/Nodal信号通路的相关因子Activin A和Lefty A在一定浓度范围内,对人胚胎干细胞(hESC)自我更新的影响。方法在hES3细胞株的无滋养层无血清培养体系中加入1-100ng/ml的Activin A和Lefty A。7天后,通过碱性磷酸酶染色法对hES3细胞的自我更新状态进行评估。结果 Activin A在浓度为1,3,10,30和100ng/ml时,与阴性对照(SR培养基)组相比,未分化克隆的比率从7.7%分别提高到了18.5%,46.8%,61.4%,64.4%和79.1%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。Lefty A组在浓度为1,3,10,30和100ng/ml时,与阴性对照(MCM培养基)组相比,未分化克隆的比率从80.5%分别降低到了72.4%,74.6%,72.2%,69.5%和65.3%,在浓度为100ng/ml时,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论较低浓度的Activin A即能有效维持hESC的自我更新,而较高浓度的Lefty A能诱导hESC分化。该结果进一步揭示了TGF-β/Activin/Nodal信号通路及其相关因子对hESC自我更新和分化的作用特点,有待对其机制进行深入研究。     

水稻胚胎发育过程相关基因的鉴定(简报)

为了研究水稻胚胎发育的分子机制,我们运用抑制差减杂交(SSH)技术鉴定了胚胎发育早期(授粉后5-7天)和晚期(授粉后15-17天)优势表达的基因.结果发现在胚胎发育早期和晚期优势表达的表达序列标签(EST)分别为47个和15个,这些EST可分为新陈代谢、蛋白合成、蛋白修饰、细胞防御或胁迫、转运运输、转译、DNA或RNA结合等多种类别.其中有32%的EST在GenBank的生物信息数据库中没有同源序列.从两个SSH文库中随机抽取11个EST分别在5DAP和15DAP水稻分化的胚胎中进行RT-PCR验证.结果显示SSH文库所获得的EST符合建库要求.对这些EST所代表的基因作进一步研究将有助于了解其在水稻胚胎发育中的生物学功能.     

维持胚胎干细胞不分化状态的分子机制

胚胎干细胞（embryonic stem cell,ESC）是指从早期胚胎的囊胚内细胞团（inner cell mass,ICM）分离出来的具有自我更新和多向分化潜能的细胞,目前被广泛地应用于基础研究和临床应用研究等生命科学领域。ESC在体外培养过程中维持不分化状态是其应用的前提与基础,阐明这个分子机制非常必要。文章总结了维持hESC未分化状态机制的最新进展,主要介绍在维持ESC不分化过程中,分化抑制因子LIF、Oct-3/4及Nanog等的重要作用。     

孤雌胚胎干细胞基因印迹及X染色体失活状态初步研究

目的:研究孤雌胚胎干细胞(phESC)与受精卵来源胚胎干细胞(hESC)在印迹基因表达、X染色体失活等方面的异同。方法:运用实时荧光相对定量PCR、甲基化特异性PCR和免疫荧光染色等方法检测phESC与hESC在父系印迹基因IGF2R,母系印迹基因SNRPN,IGF2相对表达量及X染色体失活状态。结果:①母系印迹基因SNRPN,IGF2在phESC细胞中不表达,而父系印迹基因IGF2R表达量则相对于hESC有近2倍的上调;②XIST基因在第35代phESC细胞中没有表达,意味着早期的phESC没有进行X染色体失活,而到了第55代,XIST基因开始表达并随着分化时间的延长表达量逐渐上调;③XIST启动子甲基化状态及组蛋白H3赖氨酸27三甲基化免疫荧光染色阳性证实phESC在长期培养后启动了X染色体失活。结论:phESC的X染色体失活状态在培养过程中存在不稳定的情况,建议对phESC进行更深入的表观遗传稳定性研究,以确保这种细胞未来安全、高效的应用。     

抑制消减杂交结合cDNA微阵列技术鉴定人肾癌组织高表达基因谱

为克隆肾癌组织高表达基因, 探讨肾癌发生、发展的分子基础, 以人肾癌组织mRNA为试验方, 正常肾组织mRNA为对照构建抑制消减杂交文库. 用文库379个克隆制作基因芯片, 以同位素标记探针对文库进行高通量筛选, 对肾癌组织中表达增高6倍以上的67个克隆进行测序, 结果在GenBank中进行比对分析, 其中4个克隆为新EST片段, 2个为KIAA类基因, 其余克隆为已知基因. 其中已有文献报道的肾癌相关基因, 如VEGF, 波形蛋白, 组织因子等, 大部分为新发现的肾癌相关基因, 包括锌带蛋白、垂体瘤转化基因1等. 3个EST及一些在肾癌组织中高表达的已知基因以Northern杂交、RT-PCR作了验证. 免疫组化与Western blot进一步证实锌带蛋白与垂体瘤转化基因1在肾癌组织中表达显著增强. 这些高表达的基因可能成为肾癌诊断、治疗的潜在靶点, 有助于从基因谱的角度进一步认识肾癌发生、发展的分子机制.     

4龄中华鲟垂体的EST分析

表达序列标签 (Expressed sequence tag, EST) 是鉴定基因表达规律和发现新基因的一种有效的分子生物学手段。为了能在中华鲟(Acipenser sinensis Gray) 中发现与生长和生殖内分泌调控相关的基因,我们构建了中华鲟垂体的SMART cDNA质粒文库。垂体是调节生长和生殖内分泌的重要器官。在本研究中,通过测序筛选得到了944个EST克隆,将所得EST 与 GenBank 数据库中的序列进行比对, 结果表明,802 (84.96%) 个克隆可以找到同源序列,共代表461个基因, 其中含132个已知功能基因;而 142 (15.04%) 个克隆不能找到同源序列。研究发现,在所有基因中,阿黑皮素原基因 (Proopiomelanocortin, POMC) 是出现次数最高的基因,占总EST数的10.17%, 显示出其在垂体中的重要地位。我们还发现了7个未知功能的基因并重点研究了其在心脏、肝脏、脾脏、肾脏、肌肉、精巢、卵巢和垂体等组织中的表达特异性。结果发现,4个基因：EG009334、EG009337、EG009338 和 EG009340为垂体特异性表达或垂体和卵巢特异性表达。对这些基因进一步的功能研究将有利于我们更好地了解中华鲟生长和生殖内分泌调控的分子机制。     

过表达微小RNA miR-125b对人胚胎干细胞增殖的影响

目的:通过在人胚胎干细胞(hESC)中有效转染微小RNA miR-125b的真核表达载体,研究过表达miR-125b对hESC增殖的影响。方法:将在无饲养层上培养至第3 d,克隆融合达70%的hESC用Accutase酶消化为单细胞,然后用LipofectAMINE2000对hESC单细胞转染pHRS-1cla-miR125b-CMV-EGFP载体及其对照pHRS-1cla-CMV-EGFP载体,通过实时定量PCR对转染后细胞中成熟miR-125b的表达进行检测;进一步进行细胞计数和克隆计数,对miR-125b表达上调的hESC的增殖情况进行分析。结果:实时定量PCR检测结果表明,细胞转染后72 h,miR-125b的表达上调1.45倍,说明hESC转染成功;克隆计数及细胞计数结果显示过表达miR-125b的hESC增殖受到明显抑制(P<001)。结论:转染miR-125b真核表达载体的hESC能够上调成熟miR-125b的表达,hESC中miR-125b的表达上调能明显抑制hESC的增殖。     

小鼠胚胎干细胞定向分化为神经干细胞过程中microRNA的变化

目的用生物芯片技术分析胚胎干细胞定向分化为神经干细胞过程中microRNA(miRNA)的表达变化,筛选调控的分化的miRNA,研究分化调控机制。方法胚胎干细胞在含LIF培养基中培养3d后,采用经典5步培养方法定向诱导向神经干细胞分化,采用nestin作为神经干细胞标记进行鉴定,送检胚胎干细胞及神经干细胞,提取总RNA以及小分子RNA,经荧光标记后与miRNA基因芯片杂交,获得胚胎干细胞诱导前后miRNA表达谱。结果1)胚胎干细胞在含LIF培养过程中保持未分化状态,Oct-4、碱性磷酸酶表达阳性;2)经典五步法诱导胚胎干细胞定向分化为神经干细胞,nestin阳性细胞为85%;3)通过基因微阵列分析,有90个miRNA的改变显著,其中68个表达上调,22个表达下调。结论miRNA可能对胚胎干细胞定向分化为神经干细胞过程起到关键作用。     

颌下腺导管细胞与胶原海绵细胞相容性的实验研究

为探讨胶原海绵对颌下腺 (submandibulargland ,SMG)导管细胞的细胞相容性 ,采用HE染色光镜观察及免疫组化观察SMG导管细胞接种于胶原海绵后 ,细胞的生长情况。光镜下可见接种后第 1d细胞数量较少 ,分散于胶原海绵支架中间 ,第 7d细胞数量明显增加 ,免疫组织化学染色抗IV型胶原抗体染色呈阳性 ,说明细胞与支架材料之间已经有细胞外基质产生。胶原海绵具有良好的细胞相容性 ,是一种理想的支架材料。与胶原海绵复合培养 ,颌下腺导管细胞仍可保持良好的增殖能力。     

Determining Cell Number During Cell Culture using the Scepter Cell Counter

Counting cells is often a necessary but tedious step for in vitro cell culture. Consistent cell concentrations ensure experimental reproducibility and accuracy. Cell counts are important for monitoring cell health and proliferation rate, assessing immortalization or transformation, seeding cells for subsequent experiments, transfection or infection, and preparing for cell-based assays. It is important that cell counts be accurate, consistent, and fast, particularly for quantitative measurements of cellular responses.Despite this need for speed and accuracy in cell counting, 71% of 400 researchers surveyed¹ who count cells using a hemocytometer. While hemocytometry is inexpensive, it is laborious and subject to user bias and misuse, which results in inaccurate counts. Hemocytometers are made of special optical glass on which cell suspensions are loaded in specified volumes and counted under a microscope. Sources of errors in hemocytometry include: uneven cell distribution in the sample, too many or too few cells in the sample, subjective decisions as to whether a given cell falls within the defined counting area, contamination of the hemocytometer, user-to-user variation, and variation of hemocytometer filling rate².To alleviate the tedium associated with manual counting, 29% of researchers count cells using automated cell counting devices; these include vision-based counters, systems that detect cells using the Coulter principle, or flow cytometry¹. For most researchers, the main barrier to using an automated system is the price associated with these large benchtop instruments¹.The Scepter cell counter is an automated handheld device that offers the automation and accuracy of Coulter counting at a relatively low cost. The system employs the Coulter principle of impedance-based particle detection³ in a miniaturized format using a combination of analog and digital hardware for sensing, signal processing, data storage, and graphical display. The disposable tip is engineered with a microfabricated, cell- sensing zone that enables discrimination by cell size and cell volume at sub-micron and sub-picoliter resolution. Enhanced with precision liquid-handling channels and electronics, the Scepter cell counter reports cell population statistics graphically displayed as a histogram.     

细胞提取物重编程研究进展

体细胞重编程是在特定的条件下使已分化的细胞转变成为另一种细胞.体细胞重编程的方式主要有体细胞核移植技术、细胞融合技术、细胞提取物处理技术及特定转录因子转染技术.现有研究表明,细胞提取物重编程技术在体细胞重编程中发挥着一定的作用,为此,就该技术的最新研究进展和可能机制作一综述.     

Cell Physician: Reading Cell Motion

Cell motility is an essential phenomenon in almost all living organisms. It is natural to think that behavioral or shape changes of a cell bear information about the underlying mechanisms that generate these changes. Reading cell motion, namely, understanding the underlying biophysical and mechanochemical processes, is of paramount importance. The mathematical model developed in this paper determines some physical features and material properties of the cells locally through analysis of live cell image sequences and uses this information to make further inferences about the molecular structures, dynamics, and processes within the cells, such as the actin network, microdomains, chemotaxis, adhesion, and retrograde flow. The generality of the principals used in formation of the model ensures its wide applicability to different phenomena at various levels. Based on the model outcomes, we hypothesize a novel biological model for collective biomechanical and molecular mechanism of cell motion.     

Tuning Cell Motility via Cell Tension with a Mechanochemical Cell Migration Model

Cell migration is orchestrated by a complicated mechanochemical system. However, few cell migration models take into account the coupling between the biochemical network and mechanical factors. Here, we construct a mechanochemical cell migration model to study the cell tension effect on cell migration. Our model incorporates the interactions between Rac-GTP, Rac-GDP, F-actin, myosin, and cell tension, and it is very convenient in capturing the change of cell shape by taking the phase field approach. This model captures the characteristic features of cell polarization, cell shape change, and cell migration modes. It shows that cell tension inhibits migration ability monotonically when cells are applied with persistent external stimuli. On the other hand, if random internal noise is significant, the regulation of cell tension exerts a nonmonotonic effect on cell migration. Because the increase of cell tension hinders the formation of multiple protrusions, migration ability could be maximized at intermediate cell tension under random internal noise. These model predictions are consistent with our single-cell experiments and other experimental results.     

Cell Cycle Markers for Live Cell Analyses

Many cellular processes are regulated by cell cycle dependent changes in protein dynamics and localization. Studying these changes in vivo requires methods to distinguish the different cell cycle stages. Here we demonstrate the use of DNA Ligase I fused to DsRed1 as an in situ marker to identify S phase and the subsequent transition to G2 in live cells. Using this marker, we observed changes in the nuclear distribution of Dnmt1 during cell cycle progression. Based on the different nuclear distribution of DNA Ligase I and Dnmt1 in G2 and G1, we demonstrate that the combination of both proteins allows the direct discrimination of all cell cycle phases using either immunostainings or fusions with fluorescent proteins. These markers are new tools to directly study cell cycle dependent processes in both, fixed and living cells.