Requirement of protein synthesis for the coupling of histone mRNA levels and DNA replication

H1 and core histone mRNA levels have been examined in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors with different mechanisms of action. Total HeLa cell RNAs were analyzed by Northern Blot hybridization using cloned human histone genes as probes. Inhibition of DNA replication resulted in a rapid decline in histone mRNA levels. However, in the presence of cycloheximide or puromycin, H1 and core mRNAs did not decrease in parallel with DNA synthesis, but were stabilized and accumulated. Inhibition of DNA synthesis with hydroxyurea after the inhibition of protein synthesis did not lead to a decline in histone mRNA levels. These results suggest that synthesis of a protein(s)--perhaps a histone protein(s)--is required for the coordination of DNA synthesis and histone mRNA levels.     

Differential stimulation of histone and high mobility group chromatin protein synthesis in the rat uterus by estrogen

Uterine tissue isolated from immature rats at different times after estradiol injection was incubated with medium containing [3H]lysine. The acid-extractable protein from the uterine tissue was subjected to electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulfate and acid-urea-Triton X-100 polyacrylamide gels, and the rate of chromatin protein synthesis determined by densitometric analysis of the fluorographs of the gels. Synthesis of chromatin proteins (histones and high mobility group chromatin proteins) was stimulated by 3 h after estrogen treatment and reached a peak at 9 h, several hours before DNA synthesis was stimulated. Synthesis of chromatin proteins occurred at the same time as total cellular protein synthesis. Estrogen stimulated the synthesis of histone variants at different rates, but the accumulation of histone proteins remained coordinated such that equivalent amounts of histone proteins were being produced at any one time.     

Stability of histone mRNAs is related to their location in polysomes

Synthesis of histone mRNAs is closely coupled to DNA synthesis. Following inhibition of DNA synthesis in L6 myoblasts with cytosine arabinoside, a coordinate and exaggerated rate of degradation of histone mRNAs occurs while other mRNAs, encoding ribosomal protein L32 and actin, are unaffected. Inhibition of protein synthesis by puromycin, emetine, or cycloheximide stabilizes histone mRNAs and results in their accumulation. When inhibition of DNA synthesis was followed immediately by inhibition of protein synthesis, the exaggerated rate of decay of the existing subspecies of histone H4 mRNAs was prevented and histone mRNA accumulated. If inhibition of protein synthesis was delayed longer than 3 minutes following inhibition of DNA synthesis, the ability to accumulate H4 mRNAs was lost. Furthermore, new protein synthesis was required to activate the mechanism which specifically destabilized histone mRNA. Puromycin was able to prevent the exaggerated rate of degradation of the various subspecies of H4 mRNA when added up to 15 min after inhibition of DNA synthesis, whereas emetine was effective only when added up to 5 min following inhibition of DNA synthesis. These data suggest that histone H4 mRNAs in polysomes are better targets than those released from polysomes for the specific mechanism which destabilizes histone mRNAs upon inhibition of DNA synthesis.     

Kinetics of accumulation and depletion of soluble newly synthesized histone in the reciprocal regulation of histone and DNA synthesis

Procedures are presented which permit the identification and analysis of cellular histone that is not bound to chromatin. This histone, called soluble histone, could be distinguished from that bound to chromatin by the state of H4 modification and the lack of H2A ubiquitination. Changes in the levels of newly synthesized soluble histone were analyzed with respect to the balance between histone and DNA synthesis in hamster ovary cells. Pulse-chase protocols suggested that the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction into chromatin may have two kinetic components with half-depletion times of about 1 and 40 min. When protein synthesis was inhibited, the pulse-chase kinetics of newly synthesized histone from the solubl fraction into chromatin were not significantly altered from those of the control. However, in contrast to the control, when protein synthesis was inhibited, DNA synthesis was also inhibited with kinetics similar to those of the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction. There was a rapid decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis with a half-deceleration time of 1 min down to about 30% of the control rate, followed by a slower decrease with an approximate half-deceleration time of 40 min. When DNA synthesis was inhibited, newly synthesized histone accumulated in the soluble fraction, but H2A and H2B continued to complex with chromatin at a significant rate. Soluble histone in G1 cells showed the same differential partitioning of H4/H3 and H2A/H2B between the soluble and chromatin-bound fractions as was found in cycling cells with inhibited DNA synthesis. These results support a unified model of reciprocal regulatory mechanisms between histone and DNA synthesis in the assembly of chromatin.     

H1 variant synthesis in proliferating and quiescent human cells

The synthesis of histone H1 isoprotein species in human cells of several different types and in several different physiological states was studied. Up to five H1 and two H1 degrees isoprotein species could be resolved by two-dimensional electrophoresis. All five H1 isoprotein species were synthesized in exponentially growing cultures of IMR-90 human fibroblasts; in quiescent IMR-90 cells the synthesis of three H1 isoprotein species was greatly decreased while the synthesis of two others was much less affected. When DNA synthesis in exponentially growing cultures of IMR-90 was inhibited, the pattern of H1 isoprotein synthesis became similar to that found in quiescent cultures. Other human cells, isolated from blood, yielded similar results. These results suggest that the pattern of H1 synthesis is the same for cells in non-S phases of the cell cycle and in quiescent cells. Thus for histone H1 in human cells the relationship of the variant synthesis pattern to the growth state and DNA replication is similar to that of the core histone H3 but not that of H2A.     

Uncoordinate synthesis of histone H1 in cells arrested in the G1 phase

It has been known for several years that DNA replication and histone synthesis occur concomitantly in cultured mammalian cells. Normally all five classes of histones are synthesized coordinately. However, mouse myeloma cells, synchronized by starvation for isoleucine, synthesize increased amounts of histone H1 relative to the four nucleosomal core histones. This unscheduled synthesis of histone H1 is reduced within 1 h after refeeding isoleucine, and is not a normal component of G1. The synthesis of H1 increases coordinately again with other histones during the S phase. The DNA synthesis inhibitors, cytosine arabinoside and hydroxyurea, block all histone synthesis in S-phase cells. The levels of histone H1 mRNA, relative to the other histone mRNAs, is increased in isoeleucine-starved cells and decreases rapidly after refeeding isoleucine. The increased incorporation of histone H1 is at least partially due to the low isoleucine content of histone H1. Starvation of cells for lysine resulted in a decrease in H1 synthesis relative to core histones. Again the ratio was altered on refeeding the amino acid. 3T3 cells starved for serum also incorporated only H1 histones into chromatin. The ratio of different H1 proteins also changed. The synthesis of the H1⁰ protein was predominant in G₀ cells, and reduced in S-phase cells. These data indicate the metabolism of H1 is independent of the other histones when cell growth is arrested.