Factors influencing the phytoplankton steady state assemblages in a drinking-water reservoir (Ömerli reservoir, Istanbul)

In situ growth of heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) in Lake Donghu, a eutrophic shallow lake in mainland China, was studied from January 1999 to March 2000 using a modified Weisse protocol. The study results indicated that the growth rates of HNF showed pronounced seasonal variation (–0.37–1.25 d^–1), reaching the maximum during spring to early summer. When the water temperature was higher than 25.5°C, HNF growth was inversely proportional to water temperature. There was an effect by bacterial abundance and autotrophic picoplankton on HNF growth that depended on location. HNF biomass was the highest in late spring, and the HNF production ranged from –2.25 to 35.45 mg l^–1 d^–1 with mean of 3.17 mg l^–1d^–1. When considered in the context of biomass and production data for zooplankton in Lake Donghu, it was evident that HNF contributed significantly to the total zooplankton production in Lake Donghu. These in situ studies indicate that temperature and food supply are the major determinants of HNF abundance and productivity.     

Dynamics of bacterioplankton in a mesotrophic French reservoir (Pareloup)

Bacterioplankton abundance, biomass and production were studied at a central station (35 m depth) from April 1987 to September 1988 in a mesotrophic reservoir. Bacterial production was calculated by the (³H) thymidine method.For the water column, integrated estimates of bacterioplankton abundance ranged from 2.3 10⁹ to 4.6 10⁹ cells l^–1, and carbon biomass from 0.037 to 0.068 mg C l^–1; the thymidine incorporation rates ranged from 0.8 to 17.2 picomoles l^–1 h^–1, leading to net bacterial production estimates of less than 0.7 µg C l^–1 d^–1 in winter to 18 µg C l^–1 d^–1 in summer. About 55% of the production occurred in the euphotic layers.Over the year, the bacterial carbon requirement represented 90% of the autotrophic production for the whole lake. It was five times lower than autotrophic production in spring, but twice as high in summer. This important temporal lack of balance suggests that not all the spring primary production products are consumed immediately and/or that other carbon sources probably support bacterial growth in summer.     

Heterotrophic bacterial production in Lake Xolotlán (Managua) during 1988–1989

The biomass and production (thymidine incorporation) of heterotrophic bacterioplankton has been assessed from July, 1988, to October, 1989. in Lake Xolotlán, Nicaraqua. Bacterial abundance was high, 2–3.10¹⁰ cells.l^–1, and bacterial biomass averaged ca. 0.75 mg C.l^–1, or roughly 20% of the partivculate organic carbon. Bactrial production averaged between 3.5–5 g C.l^–1.h^–1 and on a areal basis was 650–959 mg C.m^–2.d^–1 or 13–20% ofthe primary production. Although bacterial production (volumetric basis) was typical for eutrophic lakeks, the bacterial specific growth rate was low, the bacteial population doubling time was ca. 1 week, perhaps indicating that there was a low grazing pressure on the bacteria.     

Examining the relationship between bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates in Funka Bay (Japan) using the size-fractionation method

The chemical and biological conditions, and the bacteria-heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) relationship were investigated in the vicinity of Funka Bay, southwest of Hokkaido, Japan during early spring 1999. At the time of sampling, chlorophyll a concentration, bacteria, phycoerythrin rich-cyanobacteria, and HNF abundance were in the following ranges: 0.3–3.6 g l^–1, 2.5–5.6 × 10⁵ cells ml^–1, 0.6–1.2 × 10³ cells ml^–1, and 2.2–4.2 × 10³ cells ml^–1, respectively. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen, phosphate and silicate concentrations were in the ranges: 8.7–12.2 M, 0.9–2.0 M, and 21.6–25.5 M, respectively. Primary production ranged from 6.4 to 76.3 mg C m^–3 d^–1. Using water samples from regions of different productivity levels (in and outside bay), the bacteria - HNF relationship was uncoupled experimentally by the size-fractionation technique. Higher primary production (19.9 mg C m^–3 d^–1) in the bay supported higher bacterial growth rate (0.029 h^–1). However, outside the bay both primary production (6.4 mg C m^–3 d^–1) and bacterial growth rate (0.007 h^–1) were lower. The HNF growth rates and grazing rates were similar for both but by comparing both HNF grazing capacity and bacterial production, there was net decrease in bacterial abundance outside the bay and net increase inside the bay. The microbial parameters (rates and abundance) and the amount of carbon flow estimated through the phytoplankton – dissolved organic matter (DOM) – bacteria loop were different between the coastal station and the open ocean station. However HNF grazing and growth rates was similar for both stations.     

Seasonal change in the proportion of bacterial and phytoplankton production along a salinity gradient in a shallow estuary

We intended to evaluate the relative contribution of primary production versus allochthonous carbon in the production of bacterial biomass in a mesotrophic estuary. Different spatial and temporal ranges were observed in the values of bacterioplankton biomass (31–273 g C l^–1) and production (0.1–16.0 g C l^–1 h^–1, 1.5–36.8 mg C m^–2 h^–1) as well as in phytoplankton abundance (50–1700 g C l^–1) and primary production (0.1–512.9 g C l^–1 h^–1, 1.5–512.9 mg C m^–2 h^–1). Bacterial specific growth rate (0.10–1.68 d^–1) during the year did not fluctuate as much as phytoplankton specific growth rate (0.02–0.74 d^–1). Along the salinity gradient and towards the inner estuary, bacterio- and phytoplankton biomass and production increased steadily both in the warm and cold seasons. The maximum geographical increase observed in these variables was 12 times more for the bacterial community and 8 times more for the phytoplankton community. The warm to cold season ratios of the biological variables varied geographically and according to these variables. The increase at the warm season achieved its maximum in the biomass production, particularly in the marine zone and at high tide (20 and 112 times higher in bacterial and phytoplankton production, respectively). The seasonal variation in specific growth rate was most noticeable in phytoplankton, with seasonal ratios of 3–26. The bacterial community of the marine zone responded positively – generating seasonal ratios of 1–13 in bacterial specific growth rate – to the strong warm season increment in phytoplankton growth rate in this zone. In the brackish water zone where even during the warm season allochthonous carbon accounted for 41% (on average) of the bacterial carbon demand, the seasonal ratio of bacterial specific growth rate varied from about 1 to 2. During the warm season, an average of 21% of the primary production was potentially sufficient to support the whole bacterial production. During the cold months, however, the total primary production would be either required or even insufficient to support bacterial production. The estuary turned then into a mostly heterotrophic system. However, the calculated annual production of biomass by bacterio- and phytoplankton in the whole ecosystem showed that auto- and heterotrophic production was balanced in this estuary.     

Role of plankton in the turnover of organic matter on the Great Barrier Reef,Australia

Number, biomass and production of phytoplankton, bacteria, micro- and mesozooplankton and turnover of labile and stable organic matter were measured in waters over some Capricornia round reefs, and over the reefs of Lizard Island. Primary production was 10 to 40 mg C m^–3 d^–1 but was lower over the living reefs. Microbial wet biomass in reef waters varied from 100 to 500 mg m^–3, and production from 4 to 68 mg C m^–3 d^–1, which was commensurable with primary production. The biomass of microzooplankton (ciliates, zooflagellates and larvae) in waters of Lizard Island reefs reached 100–300 mg m^–3. Mesozooplankton biomass at night in reef waters of Heron Island varied from 200 to 800 mg m^–3. Its composition depended upon the tide phase. PB coefficients in bacterioplankton were 0.3 to 1.2 per day. The food demand of bacterioplankton in waters over the reefs was 5 to 20 times higher than the primary phytoplankton production. Labile organic matter (LOM) doubled in waters after it stayed over living reef for several hours. The turnover time of LOM in reef waters was as short as 1–2 weeks.     

Seasonal coupling between phyto- and bacterioplankton in a sand pit lake (Créteil lake,France)

Phyto- and bacterioplankton biomass and activity were simultaneously measured during the course of one year in the shallow Créteil Lake (France).Phytoplankton was dominated, during the whole year, by small-sized organisms (10 to 25 µm). Bacteria were in a majority small coccoids (<0.3 µm). Phyto -and bacterioplankton abundances averaged respectively 3.3 × 10⁶ cells l^–1 and 6 × 10⁹ cells l^–1.The phasing of the activity and biomass periods suggest a close coupling between phyto- and bacterioplankton. There were two distinct periods of high activity and biomass. Maximal values were observed in summer but an early increase occurred also in winter. Low or undetectable phytoplankton excretion rates, when heterotrophic activity was maximum, indicated a bacterial uptake of up to 100% of the released algal products during the incubation period. Heterotrophic uptake measurements with both glucose and amino acids revealed a seasonal change of the substrates in the lake, glucose uptake being associated more with the maximum activity of the algae, while the amino acids uptake was relatively higher during their decline.The maximal photosynthetic rate averaged 21.5 mgC m^–3 h^–1 and mean Vmax values were 0.056 and 0.050 mgC m^–3 h^–1 respectively for glucose and amino acids uptake.     

Seasonal cycle of the microbial plankton in Crooked Lake,Antarctica

Summary Changes in the abundance of the components of the microbial plankton between July 1990 and March 1991 in Crooked Lake, one of the largest and deepest freshwater lakes in Antarctica, are described. Chlorophyll a concentration is low (0.2–0.4g·1^–1) and there is no discernable spring increase. The phytoplankton is largely dominated by flagellates. Bacterioplankton exhibits a seasonal pattern of abundance ranging from 1.0 × 10⁸·1^–1 in July to 3.25 × 10⁸·1^–1 in September. Changes in bacterial abundance probably relate to temperature and grazing by heterotrophic and mixotrophic flagellates. Total flagellated protozoan concentrations ranged between 25–136 × 10²·l^–1. Autotrophic and heterotrophic flagellate abundances were coupled and peaks in their abundance oscillated with peaks in bacterioplankton concentration. Four species of ciliated protozoa, dominated by oligotrichs, particularly the plastidic Strombidium, inhabit the lake. The plankton is characterised by the presence of floes which act as loci for bacteria, flagellates and amoebae and feeding sites for the ciliates and the two sparce metazoan components of the plankton. Crooked Lake is extremely oligotrophic but nonetheless supports a plankton community with a low species diversity and simple trophodynamics.     

Benthic Bacterial Production and Protozoan Predation in a Silty Freshwater Environment

The interrelation of heterotrophic bacteria with bacterivorous protists has been widely studied in pelagic environments, but data on benthic habitats, especially in freshwater systems, are still scarce. We present a seasonal study focusing on bacterivory by heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) and ciliates in the silty sediment of a temperate macrophyte-dominated oxbow lake. From January 2001 to February 2002 we monitored the standing stock of bacteria and protozoa, bacterial secondary production (BSP, ³H-thymidine, and ¹⁴C-leucine incorporation), and grazing rates of HNF and ciliates on bacteria (FLB uptake) in the oxic sediment of the investigated system. BSP ranged from 470 to 4050 µg C L^–1 wet sediment h^–1. The bacterial compartment turned out to be highly dynamic, indicated by population doubling times (0.6–10.0 d), which were comparable to those in the water column of the investigated system. Yet, the control mechanisms acting upon the bacterial population led to a relative constancy of bacterial standing stock during a year. Ingestion rates of protozoan grazers were 0–20.0 bacteria HNF^–1 h^–1 and 0–97.6 bacteria ciliate^–1 h^–1. HNF and ciliates together cropped 0–14 (mean 4)% of BSP, indicating that they did not significantly contribute to benthic bacterial mortality during any period of the year. The low impact of protozoan grazing was due to the low numbers of HNF and ciliates in relation to bacteria (1.8–3.5 × 10⁴ bacteria HNF^–1, 0.9–3.1 × 10⁶ bacteria ciliate^–1). Thus, grazing by HNF and ciliates could be ruled out as a parameter regulating bacterial standing stock or production in the sediment of the investigated system, but the factors responsible for the limitation of benthic protistan densities and the fate of benthic BSP remained unclear.     

Ciliates are the Dominant Grazers on Pico- and Nanoplankton in a Shallow,Naturally Highly Eutrophic Lake

Abundance and biomass of the microbial loop members [bacteria, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), and ciliates] were seasonally measured in the naturally eutrophic and shallow (2.8 mean depth) Lake Võrtsjärv, which has a large open surface area (average 270 km²) and highly turbid water (Secchi depth <1 m). Grazing rates (filter feeding rates) on 0.5-, 3-, and 6-μm-diameter particles were measured to estimate pico- and nanoplankton grazing (filter feeding) by micro- and metazooplankton. Among grazers, HNF had a low abundance (<50 cells mL^?1) and, due to their low specific filtering rates, they only grazed a minor fraction of the bacterioplankton (≤4.2% of total grazing). Ciliates were relatively abundant (≤158 cells mL^?1) and, considering their high specific feeding rates, were able to graze more than 100% of the bacterial biomass production in the open part of the lake, whereas the average daily grazing accounted for 9.3% of the bacterial standing stock. Ciliates were potentially important grazers of nanoplanktonic organisms (on average, approximately 20% of the standing stock of 3-μm-size particles was grazed daily). Metazooplankton grazed a minor part of the bacterioplankton, accounting for only 0.1% of standing stock of bacteria. Grazing on nanoplankton (3–6 μm) by metazooplankton was higher (0.4% of standing stock). The hypothesis is proposed that ciliates dominate due to a lack of top–down regulation by predators, and HNF have a low abundance due to strong grazing pressure by ciliates.