Sorting of H,K-ATPase beta-subunit in MDCK and LLC-PK cells is independent of mu 1B adaptin expression

The cytoplasmic tail of the H,K-ATPase beta-subunit contains a putative tyrosine-based motif that directs the beta-subunit's basolateral sorting when it is expressed in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells. When expressed in LLC-PK(1) cells, however, the beta-subunit is localized to the apical membrane. Several proteins that contain tyrosine-based motifs, including the low-density lipoprotein and transferrin receptors, show a similar sorting 'defect' when expressed in LLC-PK(1) cells. For low-density lipoprotein and transferrin receptors, this behavior is due to the differential expression of the mu 1B subunit of the AP-1B clathrin adaptor complex. mu 1B is expressed by MDCK cells, but not LLC-PK(1) cells, and transfection of mu 1B into LLC-PK(1) cells restores basolateral localization of low-density lipoprotein and transferrin receptors. For the beta-subunit, however, mu B expression in LLC-PK(1) cells does not induce its basolateral expression. We found that the beta-subunit interacts with both mu 1B and mu 1A in vitro and in vivo. The capacity to participate in a mu 1B interaction therefore is not sufficient to program the beta-subunit's basolateral localization in MDCK cells. Our data suggest that the H,K-ATPase beta-subunit's basolateral sorting signal is either masked in certain epithelial cells, or requires an interaction with sorting machinery other than AP-1B for delivery to the basolateral plasma membrane.     

Basolateral sorting of human poliovirus receptor alpha involves an interaction with the mu1B subunit of the clathrin adaptor complex in polarized epithelial cells

Poliovirus receptor (hPVR/CD155) is a cell surface glycoprotein that belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily but its natural function remains unknown. Two membrane-bound isoforms, hPVRalpha and hPVRdelta, are known to date, and they differ only in the amino acid sequence of their cytoplasmic domains. To gain an insight into the possible function of the cytoplasmic domains, we examined the localization of introduced hPVRalpha and hPVRdelta in polarized epithelial cells deficient of native hPVRs. Basolateral sorting of hPVRalpha was observed in Madine-Darby canine kidney cells expressing mu1B, but not in LLC-PK1 porcine kidney cells deficient in mu1B. Distribution of hPVRdelta, however, occurred both on the apical and basolateral plasma membranes of these two cell lines. Basolateral sorting of hPVRalpha was also seen in LLC-PK1 cells that expressed an intact exogenous mu1B, but not in the cells that expressed a mutant mu1B lacking binding ability to tyrosine-containing signals. These results indicate that mu1B is involved in the distribution of hPVRalpha to the basolateral membrane. Comparative distribution analysis of hPVRalpha using a series of mutants with truncations and substitutions in the cytoplasmic tail demonstrated that determinant for the basolateral sorting resided in the tyrosine-containing motif of the cytoplasmic tail. Furthermore, yeast two hybrid analysis strongly suggested that the tyrosine motif directly interacted with mu1B protein. Thus, basolateral sorting of hPVRalpha appears to involve the interaction with mu1B through a tyrosine motif existing in the cytoplasmic domain.     

The basolateral targeting signal of CD147 (EMMPRIN) consists of a single leucine and is not recognized by retinal pigment epithelium

CD147, a type I integral membrane protein of the immunoglobulin superfamily, exhibits reversed polarity in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). CD147 is apical in RPE in contrast to its basolateral localization in extraocular epithelia. This elicited our interest in understanding the basolateral sorting signals of CD147 in prototypic Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. The cytoplasmic domain of CD147 has basolateral sorting information but is devoid of well-characterized basolateral signals, such as tyrosine and di-leucine motifs. Hence, we carried out systematic site-directed mutagenesis to delineate basolateral targeting information in CD147. Our detailed analysis identified a single leucine (252) as the basolateral targeting motif in the cytoplasmic tail of CD147. Four amino acids (243-246) N-terminal to leucine 252 are also critical basolateral determinants of CD147, because deletion of these amino acids leads to mistargeting of CD147 to the apical membranes. We ruled out the involvement of adaptor complex 1B (AP1B) in the basolateral trafficking of CD147, because LLC-PK1 cells lacking AP1B, target CD147 basolaterally. At variance with MDCK cells, the human RPE cell line ARPE-19 does not distinguish between CD147 (WT) and CD147 with leucine 252 mutated to alanine and targets both proteins apically. Thus, our study identifies an atypical basolateral motif of CD147, which comprises a single leucine and is not recognized by RPE cells. This unusual basolateral sorting signal will be useful in unraveling the specialized sorting machinery of RPE cells.     

Differential recognition of tyrosine-based basolateral signals by AP-1B subunit mu1B in polarized epithelial cells

To investigate the importance of tyrosine recognition by the AP-1B clathrin adaptor subunit mu1B for basolateral sorting of integral membrane proteins in polarized epithelial cells, we have produced and characterized a mutant form of mu1B. The mutant (M-mu1B) contains alanine substitutions of each of the four conserved residues, which in the AP-2 adaptor subunit micro2 are critical for interacting with tyrosine-based endocytosis signals. We show M-mu1B is defective for tyrosine binding in vitro, but is nevertheless incorporated into AP-1 complexes in transfected cells. Using LLC-PK1 cells expressing either wild type or M-mu1B, we find that there is inefficient basolateral expression of membrane proteins whose basolateral targeting signals share critical tyrosines with signals for endocytosis. In contrast, membrane proteins whose basolateral targeting signals are distinct from their endocytosis signals (transferrin and low-density lipoprotein receptors) accumulate at the basolateral domain normally, although in a manner that is strictly dependent on mu1B or M-mu1B expression. Our results suggest that mu1B interacts with different classes of basolateral targeting signals in distinct ways.     

Basolateral targeting of ERBB2 is dependent on a novel bipartite juxtamembrane sorting signal but independent of the C-terminal ERBIN-binding domain

ERBB2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase present on the basolateral membrane of polarized epithelia and has important functions in organ development and tumorigenesis. Using mutagenic analyses and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, we have investigated the signals that regulate basolateral targeting of ERBB2. We show that basolateral delivery of ERBB2 is dependent on a novel bipartite juxtamembrane sorting signal residing between Gln-692 and Thr-701. The signal shows only limited sequence homology to known basolateral targeting signals and is both necessary and sufficient for correct sorting of ERBB2. In addition we demonstrate that this motif can function as a dominant basolateral targeting signal by its ability to redirect the apically localized P75 neurotrophin receptor to the basolateral membrane domain of polarized epithelial cells. Interestingly, LLC-PK1 cells, which are deficient for the micro 1B subunit of the AP1B adaptor complex, missort a large proportion of ERBB2 to the apical membrane domain. This missorting can be partially corrected by the introduction of micro 1B, suggesting a possible role for AP1B in ERBB2 endosomal trafficking. Furthermore, we find that the C-terminal ERBIN binding domain of ERBB2 is not necessary for its basolateral targeting in MDCK cells.     

Myosin VI is required for sorting of AP-1B-dependent cargo to the basolateral domain in polarized MDCK cells

In polarized epithelial cells, newly synthesized membrane proteins are delivered on specific pathways to either the apical or basolateral domains, depending on the sorting motifs present in these proteins. Because myosin VI has been shown to facilitate secretory traffic in nonpolarized cells, we investigated its role in biosynthetic trafficking pathways in polarized MDCK cells. We observed that a specific splice isoform of myosin VI with no insert in the tail domain is required for the polarized transport of tyrosine motif containing basolateral membrane proteins. Sorting of other basolateral or apical cargo, however, does not involve myosin VI. Site-directed mutagenesis indicates that a functional complex consisting of myosin VI, optineurin, and probably the GTPase Rab8 plays a role in the basolateral delivery of membrane proteins, whose sorting is mediated by the clathrin adaptor protein complex (AP) AP-1B. Our results suggest that myosin VI is a crucial component in the AP-1B-dependent biosynthetic sorting pathway to the basolateral surface in polarized epithelial cells.     

Polarized Traffic of LRP1 Involves AP1B and SNX17 Operating on Y-dependent Sorting Motifs in Different Pathways

Low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1) is an endocytic recycling receptor with two cytoplasmic tyrosine-based basolateral sorting signals. Here we show that during biosynthetic trafficking LRP1 uses AP1B adaptor complex to move from a post-TGN recycling endosome (RE) to the basolateral membrane. Then it recycles basolaterally from the basolateral sorting endosome (BSE) involving recognition by sorting nexin 17 (SNX17). In the biosynthetic pathway, Y₂₉ but not N₂₆ from a proximal NPXY directs LRP1 basolateral sorting from the TGN. A N₂₆A mutant revealed that this NPXY motif recognized by SNX17 is required for the receptor's exit from BSE. An endocytic Y₆₃ATL₆₆ motif also functions in basolateral recycling, in concert with an additional endocytic motif (LL_86,87), by preventing LRP1 entry into the transcytotic apical pathway. All this sorting information operates similarly in hippocampal neurons to mediate LRP1 somatodendritic distribution regardless of the absence of AP1B in neurons. LRP1 basolateral distribution results then from spatially and temporally segregation steps mediated by recognition of distinct tyrosine-based motifs. We also demonstrate a novel function of SNX17 in basolateral/somatodendritic recycling from a different compartment than AP1B endosomes.     

Antibody to AP1B adaptor blocks biosynthetic and recycling routes of basolateral proteins at recycling endosomes

The epithelial-specific adaptor AP1B sorts basolateral plasma membrane (PM) proteins in both biosynthetic and recycling routes, but the site where it carries out this function remains incompletely defined. Here, we have investigated this topic in Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) epithelial cells using an antibody against the medium subunit micro1B. This antibody was suitable for immunofluorescence and blocked the function of AP1B in these cells. The antibody blocked the basolateral recycling of two basolateral PM markers, Transferrin receptor (TfR) and LDL receptor (LDLR), in a perinuclear compartment with marker and functional characteristics of recycling endosomes (RE). Live imaging experiments demonstrated that in the presence of the antibody two newly synthesized GFP-tagged basolateral proteins (vesicular stomatitis virus G [VSVG] protein and TfR) exited the trans-Golgi network (TGN) normally but became blocked at the RE within 3-5 min. By contrast, the antibody did not block trafficking of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-LDLR from the TGN to the PM but stopped its recycling after internalization into RE in approximately 45 min. Our experiments conclusively demonstrate that 1) AP1B functions exclusively at RE; 2) TGN-to-RE transport is very fast and selective and is mediated by adaptors different from AP1B; and 3) the TGN and AP1B-containing RE cooperate in biosynthetic basolateral sorting.     

Identification of a novel mono-leucine basolateral sorting motif within the cytoplasmic domain of amphiregulin

Epithelial cells establish apical and basolateral (BL) membranes with distinct protein and lipid compositions. To achieve this spatial asymmetry, the cell utilizes a variety of mechanisms for differential sorting, delivery and retention of cell surface proteins. The EGF receptor (EGFR) and its ligand, amphiregulin (AREG), are transmembrane proteins delivered to the BL membrane in polarized epithelial cells. Herein, we show that the cytoplasmic domain of AREG (ACD) contains dominant BL sorting information; replacement of the cytoplasmic domain of apically targeted nerve growth factor receptor with the ACD redirects the chimera to the BL surface. Using sequential truncations and site-directed mutagenesis of the ACD, we identify a novel BL sorting motif consisting of a single leucine C-terminal to an acidic cluster (EEXXXL). In adaptor protein (AP)-1B-deficient cells, newly synthesized AREG is initially delivered to the BL surface as in AP-1B-expressing cells. However, in these AP-1B-deficient cells, recycling of AREG back to the BL surface is compromised, leading to its appearance at the apical surface. These results show that recycling, but not delivery, of AREG to the BL surface is AP-1B dependent.     

Distribution and function of AP-1 clathrin adaptor complexes in polarized epithelial cells

Expression of the epithelial cell-specific heterotetrameric adaptor complex AP-1B is required for the polarized distribution of many membrane proteins to the basolateral surface of LLC-PK1 kidney cells. AP-1B is distinguished from the ubiquitously expressed AP-1A by exchange of its single 50-kD mu subunit, mu1A, being replaced by the closely related mu1B. Here we show that this substitution is sufficient to couple basolateral plasma membrane proteins, such as a low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), to the AP-1B complex and to clathrin. The interaction between LDLR and AP-1B is likely to occur in the trans-Golgi network (TGN), as was suggested by the localization of functional, epitope-tagged mu1 by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. Tagged AP-1A and AP-1B complexes were found in the perinuclear region close to the Golgi complex and recycling endosomes, often in clathrin-coated buds and vesicles. Yet, AP-1A and AP-1B localized to different subdomains of the TGN, with only AP-1A colocalizing with furin, a membrane protein that uses AP-1 to recycle between the TGN and endosomes. We conclude that AP-1B functions by interacting with its cargo molecules and clathrin in the TGN, where it acts to sort basolateral proteins from proteins destined for the apical surface and from those selected by AP-1A for transport to endosomes and lysosomes.     

Basolateral sorting signals differ in their ability to redirect apical proteins to the basolateral cell surface

Polarized sorting of membrane proteins in epithelial cells is mediated by cytoplasmic basolateral signals or by apical signals in the transmembrane or exoplasmic domains. Basolateral signals were generally found to be dominant over apical determinants. We have generated chimeric proteins with the cytoplasmic domain of either the asialoglycoprotein receptor H1 or the transferrin receptor, two basolateral proteins, fused to the transmembrane and exoplasmic segments of aminopeptidase N, an apical protein, and analyzed them in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Whereas both cytoplasmic sequences induced endocytosis of the chimeras, only that of the transferrin receptor mediated basolateral expression in steady state. The H1 fusion protein, although still largely sorted to the basolateral side in biosynthetic surface transport, was subsequently resorted to the apical cell surface. We tested whether the difference in sorting between trimeric wild-type H1 and the dimeric aminopeptidase chimera was caused by the number of sorting signals presented in the oligomers. Consistent with this hypothesis, the H1 signal was fully functional in a tetrameric fusion protein with the transmembrane and exoplasmic domains of influenza neuraminidase. The results suggest that basolateral signals per se need not be dominant over apical determinants for steady-state polarity and emphasize an important contribution of the valence of signals in polarized sorting.     

The basolateral sorting signals of the thyrotropin and luteinizing hormone receptors: an unusual family of signals sharing an unusual distal intracellular localization, but unrelated in their structures

The mechanisms of the basolateral targeting of G protein-coupled receptors remain largely unknown. Mutagenesis experiments have allowed us to identify the basolateral sorting signals of the TSH and LH receptors expressed in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells and thyroid follicular FRT cells. Unexpectedly these signals (amino acids 731-746 and 672-689, respectively) share an unusual localization in the distal part of the intracellular domain of the receptors at a marked distance from the membrane. When grafted onto the p75-neurotropin receptor, these signals redirect this normally apically expressed protein to the basolateral cell surface. They are independent of the endocytosis signal. The basolateral sorting signals of TSH, LH, and FSH receptors do not exhibit primary sequence homology with each other or with any other known signal. Furthermore, circular dichroism studies show that the three signals exhibit distinct secondary structures. The TSH receptor has a stable helical structure, the LH receptor has both helix and beta-sheet structures, and the FSH receptor sorting signal has a main random coil structure. This means that even in closely-related receptors different secondary structures can be found for basolateral signals unrelated to internalization signals. This observation contrasts with what is known about basolateral signals related to internalization signals for which a common beta-turn structure has been described. Deletion of the basolateral sorting signals results in apical targeting of the receptors, suggesting the existence of apical sorting information. However, a soluble form of the TSH receptor, which harbors all N- and putative O-linked oligosaccharides, is secreted in a nonpolarized fashion. This implies that apical sorting information must be located elsewhere, either in the transmembrane or in the intracellular domains of the receptor.     

Regulation of protein traffic in polarized epithelial cells

The plasma membrane of polarized epithelial cells is divided into apical and basolateral surfaces, with different compositions. Proteins can be sent directly from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) to either surface, or can be sent first to one surface and then transcytosed to the other. The glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor is a signal for apical targeting. Signals in the cytoplasmic domain containing a β-turn determine basolateral targeting and retrieval, and are related to other sorting signals. Transcytosed proteins, such as the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (plgR), are endocytosed from the basolateral surface and then accumulate in a tubular compartment concentrated underneath the apical surface. This compartment, tentatively termed the apical recycling compartment, may be a central sorting station, as it apparently receives material from both surfaces and sorts them for delivery to the correct surface. Delivery to the apical surface from both the TGN and the apical recycling compartment appears to be regulated by protein kinases A and C, and endocytosis from the apical surface is also regulated by kinases. Transcytosis of the plgR is additionally regulated by phosphorylation of the plgR and by ligand binding to the plgR. Regulation of traffic in polarized epithelial cells plays a central role in cellular homeostasis, response to external signals and differentiation.     

Targeting of transmembrane protein shrew-1 to adherens junctions is controlled by cytoplasmic sorting motifs

We recently identified transmembrane protein shrew-1 and showed that it is able to target to adherens junctions in polarized epithelial cells. This suggested shrew-1 possesses specific basolateral sorting motifs, which we analyzed by mutational analysis. Systematic mutation of amino acids in putative sorting signals in the cytoplasmic domain of shrew-1 revealed three tyrosines and a dileucine motif necessary for basolateral sorting. Substitution of these amino acids leads to apical localization of shrew-1. By applying tannic acid to either the apical or basolateral part of polarized epithelial cells, thereby blocking vesicle fusion with the plasma membrane, we obtained evidence that the apically localized mutants were primarily targeted to the basolateral membrane and were then redistributed to the apical domain. Further support for a postendocytic sorting mechanism of shrew-1 was obtained by demonstrating that mu1B, a subunit of the epithelial cell-specific adaptor complex AP-1B, interacts with shrew-1. In conclusion, our data provide evidence for a scenario where shrew-1 is primarily delivered to the basolateral membrane by a so far unknown mechanism. Once there, adaptor protein complex AP-1B is involved in retaining shrew-1 at the basolateral membrane by postendocytic sorting mechanisms.     

Hierarchy of sorting signals in chimeras of intestinal lactase-phlorizin hydrolase and the influenza virus hemagglutinin

Lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) is an apical protein in intestinal cells. The location of sorting signals in LPH was investigated by preparing a series of mutants that lacked the LPH cytoplasmic domain or had the cytoplasmic domain of LPH replaced by sequences that comprised basolateral targeting signals and overlapping internalization signals of various potency. These signals are mutants of the cytoplasmic domain of the influenza hemagglutinin (HA), which have been shown to be dominant in targeting HA to the basolateral membrane. The LPH-HA chimeras were expressed in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) and colon carcinoma (Caco-2) cells, and their transport to the cell surface was analyzed. All of the LPH mutants were targeted correctly to the apical membrane. Furthermore, the LPH-HA chimeras were internalized, indicating that the HA tails were available to interact with the cytoplasmic components of clathrin-coated pits. The introduction of a strong basolateral sorting signal into LPH was not sufficient to override the strong apical signals of the LPH external domain or transmembrane domains. These results show that basolateral sorting signals are not always dominant over apical sorting signals in proteins that contain each and suggest that sorting of basolateral from apical proteins occurs within a common compartment where competition for sorting signals can occur.     

Apical and basolateral coated pits of MDCK cells differ in their rates of maturation into coated vesicles, but not in the ability to distinguish between mutant hemagglutinin proteins with different internalization signals

In polarized epithelial MDCK cells, all known endogenous endocytic receptors are found on the basolateral domain. The influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) which is normally sorted to the apical plasma membrane, can be converted to a basolateral protein by specific mutations in its short cytoplasmic domain that also create internalization signals. For some of these mutations, sorting to the basolateral surface is incomplete, allowing internalization of two proteins that differ by a single amino acid of the internalization signal to be compared at both the apical and basolateral surfaces of MDCK cells. The rates of internalization of HA-Y543 and HA-Y543,R546 from the basolateral surface of polarized MDCK cells resembled those in nonpolarized cells, whereas their rates of internalization from the apical cell surface were fivefold slower. However, HA-Y543,R546 was internalized approximately threefold faster than HA-Y543 at both membrane domains, indicating that apical endocytic pits in polarized MDCK cells retained the ability to discriminate between different internalization signals. Slower internalization from the apical surface could not be explained by a limiting number of coated pits: apical membrane contained 0.7 as many coated pits per cell cross-section as did basolateral membranes. 10-14% of HA-Y543 at the apical surface of polarized MDCK cells was found in coated pits, a percentage not significantly different from that observed in apical coated pits of nonpolarized MDCK cells, where internalization was fivefold faster. Thus, there was no lack of binding sites for HA-Y543 in apical coated pits of polarized cells. However, at the apical surface many more shallow pits, and fewer deep, mature pits, were observed than were seen at the basolateral. These results suggest that the slower internalization at the apical surface is due to slower maturation of coated pits, and not to a difference in recognition of internalization signals.     

Functional role of the NPxxY motif in internalization of the type 2 vasopressin receptor in LLC-PK1 cells

Interaction of the type 2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) with hormone causes desensitization and internalization. To study the role of the V2R NPxxY motif (which is involved in the clathrin-mediated endocytosis of several other receptors) in this process, we expressed FLAG-tagged wild-type V2R and a Y325F mutant V2R in LLC-PK1a epithelial cells that have low levels of endogenous V2R. Both proteins had a similar apical (35%) and basolateral (65%) membrane distribution. Substitution of Tyr³²⁵ with Phe³²⁵ prevented ligand-induced internalization of V2R determined by [³H]AVP binding and immunofluorescence but did not prevent ligand binding or signal transduction via adenylyl cyclase. Desensitization and resensitization of the V2R-Y325F mutation occurred independently of internalization. The involvement of clathrin in V2R downregulation was also shown by immunogold electron microscopy. We conclude that the NPxxY motif of the V2R is critically involved in receptor downregulation via clathrin-mediated internalization. However, this motif is not essential for the apical/basolateral sorting and polarized distribution of the V2R in LLC-PK1a cells or for adenylyl cyclase-mediated signal transduction. polarized cell culture; tyrosine motif; µ1b adaptor motif; protein traffic     

Importance of the carboxyl-terminal FTSL motif of membrane cofactor protein for basolateral sorting and endocytosis. Positive and negative modulation by signals inside and outside the cytoplasmic tail.

Membrane cofactor protein (MCP), a widely distributed complement regulatory protein, is expressed on the basolateral surface of polarized epithelial cells, and it is not endocytosed. The carboxyl-terminal tetrapeptide (FTSL) is required for polarized surface expression. The ability of this tetrapeptide to serve as an autonomous sorting signal has been analyzed by adding this sequence motif to the C terminus of an apical membrane protein, the influenza A virus hemagglutinin (HA). The recombinant protein HA-FTSL retained the apical localization of the parental HA protein. Substitution of the complete cytoplasmic tail of MCP for the cytoplasmic tail of HA resulted in the targeting of the chimeric protein (HA/MCP) to the basolateral surface suggesting that the carboxyl-terminal FTSL motif is a weak sorting signal that requires additional targeting information from the membrane-proximal part of the cytoplasmic tail of MCP for redirecting an apical protein to the basolateral membrane domain. In contrast to the native HA, the HA-FTSL protein was subject to endocytosis. The basolateral HA/MCP was also found to be internalized and thus differed from the basolateral MCP. This result suggests that the carboxyl-terminal FTSL motif serves as an internalization signal and that in native MCP sorting information outside the cytoplasmic tail counteracts this endocytosis signal. Substitution of a tyrosine for the phenylalanine dramatically increased the internalization with most of the HA-YTSL protein being present intracellularly. Our results are consistent with the view that the interplay of multiple sorting signals and the modification of a well known targeting signal (YTSL) by amino acid exchange (FTSL) determine the constitutive expression of MCP on the basolateral surface of polarized epithelial cells.     

The clathrin adaptor AP-1A mediates basolateral polarity

Clathrin and the epithelial-specific clathrin adaptor AP-1B mediate basolateral trafficking in epithelia. However, several epithelia lack AP-1B, and mice knocked out for AP-1B are viable, suggesting the existence of additional mechanisms that control basolateral polarity. Here, we demonstrate a distinct role of the ubiquitous clathrin adaptor AP-1A in basolateral protein sorting. Knockdown of AP-1A causes missorting of basolateral proteins in MDCK cells, but only after knockdown of AP-1B, suggesting that AP-1B can compensate for lack of AP-1A. AP-1A localizes predominantly to the TGN, and its knockdown promotes spillover of basolateral proteins into common recycling endosomes, the site of function of AP-1B, suggesting complementary roles of both adaptors in basolateral sorting. Yeast two-hybrid assays detect interactions between the basolateral signal of transferrin receptor and the medium subunits of both AP-1A and AP-1B. The basolateral sorting function of AP-1A reported here establishes AP-1 as a major regulator of epithelial polarity.     

Polarized transport of Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein is mediated by adaptor protein complex AP1-1B

Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein (APP) is the precursor for the Abeta peptide involved in pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. The soluble ectodomain fragment of APP (sAPP) functions as a growth factor for epithelial cells, suggesting an important function for APP outside neuronal tissue. Previous studies have shown that in polarized epithelial cells, APP is targeted to the basolateral domain. Tyr653 within the cytoplasmic tail of APP mediates the basolateral targeting of APP, but the sorting machinery that binds to this residue has largely remained unknown. In this study, we analyzed the role of adaptor complexes in the polarized sorting of APP. We show that the medium subunit mu1B of the epithelia-specific adaptor protein (AP)-1B binds onto the cytoplasmic tail of APP in a Tyr653-dependent way. Moreover, ectopic expression of mu1B in cells lacking AP-1B resulted in correction of apical missorting of wild-type but not Tyr653Ala APP. Basolateral secretion of sAPP was found to be independent of Tyr653. We propose a model for polarized targeting of APP according to which sorting of APP to basolateral domain is dependent on binding of AP-1B on Tyr653 in basolateral endosomes. This model is in accordance with the current understanding of sorting mechanisms mediating polarized targeting of membrane proteins.