Cloning and functional characterization of a formin-like protein (AtFH8) from Arabidopsis

The actin cytoskeleton is required for many cellular processes in plant cells. The nucleation process is the rate-limiting step for actin assembly. Formins belong to a new class of conserved actin nucleator, which includes at least 2 formin homology domains, FH1 and FH2, which direct the assembly of unbranched actin filaments. The function of plant formins is quite poorly understood. Here, we provide the first biochemical study of the function of conserved domains of a formin-like protein (AtFH8) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The purified recombinant AtFH8(FH1FH2) domain has the ability to nucleate actin filaments in vitro at the barbed end and caps the barbed end of actin filaments, decreasing the rate of subunit addition and dissociation. In addition, purified AtFH8(FH1FH2) binds actin filaments and severs them into short fragments. The proline-rich domain (FH1) of the AtFH8 binds directly to profilin and is necessary for nucleation when actin monomers are profilin bound. However, profilin inhibits the nucleation mediated by AtFH8(FH1FH2) to some extent, but increases the rate of actin filament elongation in the presence of AtFH8(FH1FH2). Moreover, overexpression of the full-length AtFH8 in Arabidopsis causes a prominent change in root hair cell development and its actin organization, indicating the involvement of AtFH8 in polarized cell growth through the actin cytoskeleton.     

Arabidopsis formin AtFH6 is a plasma membrane-associated protein upregulated in giant cells induced by parasitic nematodes

Plant-parasitic nematodes Meloidogyne spp induce an elaborate permanent feeding site characterized by the redifferentiation of root cells into multinucleate and hypertrophied giant cells. We have isolated by a promoter trap strategy an Arabidopsis thaliana formin gene, AtFH6, which is upregulated during giant cell formation. Formins are actin-nucleating proteins that stimulate de novo polymerization of actin filaments. We show here that three type-I formins were upregulated in giant cells and that the AtFH6 protein was anchored to the plasma membrane and uniformly distributed. Suppression of the budding defect of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae bni1Delta bnr1Delta mutant showed that AtFH6 regulates polarized growth by controlling the assembly of actin cables. Our results suggest that AtFH6 might be involved in the isotropic growth of hypertrophied feeding cells via the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. The actin cables would serve as tracks for vesicle trafficking needed for extensive plasma membrane and cell wall biogenesis. Therefore, determining how plant parasitic nematodes modify root cells into giant cells represents an attractive system to identify genes that regulate cell growth and morphogenesis.     

An Arabidopsis Class II Formin,AtFH19, Nucleates Actin Assembly,Binds to the Barbed End of Actin Filaments and Antagonizes the Effect of AtFH1 on Actin Dynamics

Formin is a major protein responsible for regulating the nucleation of actin filaments, and as such, it permits the cell to control where and when to assemble actin arrays. It is encoded by a multigene family comprising 21 members in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Arabidopsis formins can be separated into two phylogenetically-distinct classes: there are 11 class I formins and 10 class II formins. Significant questions remain unanswered regarding the molecular mechanism of actin nucleation and elongation stimulated by each formin isovariant, and how the different isovariants coordinate to regulate actin dynamics in cells. Here, we characterize a class II formin, AtFH19, biochemically. We found that AtFH19 retains all general properties of the formin family, including nucleation and barbed end capping activity. It can also generate actin filaments from a pool of actin monomers bound to profilin. However, both the nucleation and barbed end capping activities of AtFH19 are less efficient compared to those of another well-characterized formin, AtFH1. Interestingly, AtFH19 FH1FH2 competes with AtFH1 FH1FH2 in binding actin filament barbed ends, and inhibits the effect of AtFH1 FH1FH2 on actin. We thus propose a mechanism in which two quantitatively different formins coordinate to regulate actin dynamics by competing for actin filament barbed ends.     

Plant formins: diverse isoforms and unique molecular mechanism

The completed genome from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana reveals the presence of a diverse multigene family of formin-like sequences, comprising more than 20 isoforms. This review highlights recent findings from biochemical, cell biological and reverse-genetic analyses of this family of actin nucleation factors. Important advances in understanding cellular function suggest major roles for plant formins during cytokinesis and cell expansion. Biochemical studies on a subset of plant formins emphasize the need to examine molecular mechanisms outside of mammalian and yeast systems. Notably, a combination of solution-based assays for actin dynamics and timelapse, single-filament imaging with TIRFM provide evidence for the first non-processive formin (AtFH1) in eukaryotes. Despite these advances it remains difficult to generate a consensus view of plant formin activities and cellular functions. One limitation to summarizing formin properties relates to the enormous variability in domain organization among the plant formins. Generating homology-based predictions that depend on conserved domains outside of the FH1 and FH2 will be virtually impossible for plant formins. A second major drawback is the lack of facile techniques for examining dynamics of individual actin filaments within live plant cells. This constraint makes it extremely difficult to bridge the gap between biochemical characterization of particular formin and its specific cellular function. There is promise, however, that recent technical advances in engineering appropriate fluorescent markers and new fluoresence imaging techniques will soon allow the direct visualization of cortical actin filament dynamics. The emergence of other model systems for studying actin cytoskeleton in vivo, such as the moss Physcomitrella patens, may also enhance our knowledge of plant formins.     

Expression of multiple formins in adult tissues and during developmental stages of mouse brain

Formins are highly conserved heterogeneous family of proteins with several isoforms having significant contribution in multiple cellular functions. Formins play crucial role in remodelling of actin cytoskeleton and thus play important role in cell motility. Formins are also involved in many cellular activities like determining cell polarity, cytokinesis and morphogenesis. Formins are multi domain protein with characteristic homodimeric formin homology 2 (FH2) domain. It nucleates the actin filaments and its activity is regulated by the presence of characteristic formin homology 1 (FH1) domain. In higher mammals like human and mouse fifteen different formin isoforms are present. However the function and expression pattern of each and every formin in different adult tissues are not well characterized. Here we have found that multiple formins are expressing in each adult tissue of mouse, irrespective of their origin from the germ layer. Formins are also expressing from early stage of development to the adulthood in brain. The expression of many formins in a single tissue of adult mouse indicates that regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics by formins may be crucial for physiological processes like wound healing, tissue repairing, exocytosis, endocytosis, synapse formation and maintenance. Expression of FMNL2 and Fhdc1 are high in adult mouse brain as compare to embryonic stages. Higher expression of FMNL2 and Fhdc1 indicates that FMNL2 and Fhdc1 might be very important for the adult brain functions.     

Expression of GFP-mTalin reveals an actin-related role for the Arabidopsis Class II formin AtFH12

Formins (FH2 proteins) are implicated in F-actin nucleation and other aspects of cytoskeletal organization. Plants possess two formin clades, relatively well-described Class I formins and so far poorly characterized Class II formins. Comparison of Class II formin genes of two Arabidopsis species, A. thaliana and A. lyrata, indicates dynamic evolution within the Class II formin clade. Disruption of an outlier A. thaliana Class II formin gene, AtFH12 (At1g42980), whose expression is induced by NaCl, produced only negligible phenotypic effects under a variety of conditions, including salt stress, suggesting functional redundancy among Class II formins. However, the same mutation massively aggravated toxic effects of the expression of a fluorescent actin marker, GFP-tagged mouse talin (GFP-mTalin), known to interfere with normal actin dynamics. Abnormal actin structures were observed in atfh12 mutants expressing GFP-mTalin as compared to wild type. This not only demonstrates an actin-associated function for AtFH12, but also documents the feasibility of using the heterologous actin marker to “stress-test” the actin cytoskeleton in phenotyping “weak“ actin related mutant alleles.     

Arabidopsis group Ie formins localize to specific cell membrane domains, interact with actin-binding proteins and cause defects in cell expansion upon aberrant expression

The closely related proteins AtFH4 and AtFH8 represent the group Ie clade of Arabidopsis formin homologues. The subcellular localization of these proteins and their ability to affect the actin cytoskeleton were examined. AtFH4 protein activity was identified using fluorimetric techniques. Interactions between Arabidopsis profilin isoforms and AtFH4 were assayed in vitro and in vivo using pull-down assays and yeast-2-hybrid. The subcellular localization of group Ie formins was observed with indirect immunofluorescence (AtFH4) and an ethanol-inducible green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion construct (AtFH8). AtFH4 protein affected actin dynamics in vitro, and yeast-2-hybrid assays suggested isoform-specific interactions with the actin-binding protein profilin in vivo. Indirect immunofluorescence showed that AtFH4 localized specifically to the cell membrane at borders between adjoining cells. Expression of an AtFH8 fusion protein resulted in GFP localization to cell membrane zones, similar to AtFH4. Furthermore, aberrant expression of AtFH8 resulted in the inhibition of root hair elongation. Taken together, these data suggest that the group Ie formins act with profilin to regulate actin polymerization at specific sites associated with the cell membrane.     

RHO1 and RHO2 share partially overlapping functions in the regulation of cell wall integrity and hyphal polarity in Neurospora crassa

Rho proteins are key regulators of cellular morphogenesis, but their function in filamentous fungi is poorly understood. By generating conditional rho‐1 mutants, we dissected the function of the essential GTPase RHO1 in cell polarization and maintenance of cell wall integrity in Neurospora crassa. We identified NCU00668/RGF1 as RHO1‐specific exchange factor, which controls actin organization and the cell wall integrity MAK1 MAP kinase pathway through the direct interaction of active RHO1 with the formin BNI1 and PKC1 respectively. The activity of RGF1 is controlled by an intramolecular interaction of its DEP and GEF domains that blocks the activation of the GTPase. Moreover, the N‐terminal region including the DEP domain of RGF1 interacts with the plasma membrane sensor NCU06910/WSC1, potentially to activate the cell wall integrity pathway. RHO1 also functions as regulatory subunit of the glucan synthase. N. crassa possesses a second GTPase, RHO2, that is highly homologous to RHO1. RHO2 is of minor importance for growth and does not interact with BNI1. Conditional rho‐1;rho‐2 double mutants display strong synthetic growth and cell polarity defects. We show that RHO2 does not regulate glucan synthase activity and the actin cytoskeleton, but physically interacts with PKC1 to regulate the cell wall integrity pathway.     

Conformational changes in actin filaments induced by formin binding to the barbed end

Formins bind actin filaments and play an essential role in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. In this work we describe details of the formin-induced conformational changes in actin filaments by fluorescence-lifetime and anisotropy-decay experiments. The results show that the binding of the formin homology 2 domain of a mammalian formin (mouse mDia1) to actin filaments resulted in a less rigid protein structure in the microenvironment of the Cys374 of actin, weakening of the interactions between neighboring actin protomers, and greater overall flexibility of the actin filaments. The formin effect is smaller at greater ionic strength. The results show that formin binding to the barbed end of actin filaments is responsible for the increase of flexibility of actin filaments. One formin dimer can affect the dynamic properties of an entire filament. Analyses of the results obtained at various formin/actin concentration ratios indicate that at least 160 actin protomers are affected by the binding of a single formin dimer to the barbed end of a filament.     

The F-BAR protein Hof1 tunes formin activity to sculpt actin cables during polarized growth

Asymmetric cell growth and division rely on polarized actin cytoskeleton remodeling events, the regulation of which is poorly understood. In budding yeast, formins stimulate the assembly of an organized network of actin cables that direct polarized secretion. Here we show that the Fer/Cip4 homology–Bin amphiphysin Rvs protein Hof1, which has known roles in cytokinesis, also functions during polarized growth by directly controlling the activities of the formin Bnr1. A mutant lacking the C-terminal half of Hof1 displays misoriented and architecturally altered cables, along with impaired secretory vesicle traffic. In vitro, Hof1 inhibits the actin nucleation and elongation activities of Bnr1 without displacing the formin from filament ends. These effects depend on the Src homology 3 domain of Hof1, the formin homology 1 (FH1) domain of Bnr1, and Hof1 dimerization, suggesting a mechanism by which Hof1 “restrains” the otherwise flexible FH1-FH2 apparatus. In vivo, loss of inhibition does not alter actin levels in cables but, instead, cable shape and functionality. Thus Hof1 tunes formins to sculpt the actin cable network.     

PTRN‐1/CAMSAP promotes CYK‐1/formin‐dependent actin polymerization during endocytic recycling

Cargo sorting and membrane carrier initiation in recycling endosomes require appropriately coordinated actin dynamics. However, the mechanism underlying the regulation of actin organization during recycling transport remains elusive. Here we report that the loss of PTRN‐1/CAMSAP stalled actin exchange and diminished the cytosolic actin structures. Furthermore, we found that PTRN‐1 is required for the recycling of clathrin‐independent cargo hTAC‐GFP. The N‐terminal calponin homology (CH) domain and central coiled‐coils (CC) region of PTRN‐1 can synergistically sustain the flow of hTAC‐GFP. We identified CYK‐1/formin as a binding partner of PTRN‐1. The N‐terminal GTPase‐binding domain (GBD) of CYK‐1 serves as the binding interface for the PTRN‐1 CH domain. The presence of the PTRN‐1 CH domain promoted CYK‐1‐mediated actin polymerization, which suggests that the PTRN‐1‐CH:CYK‐1‐GBD interaction efficiently relieves autoinhibitory interactions within CYK‐1. As expected, the overexpression of the CYK‐1 formin homology domain 2 (FH2) substantially restored actin structures and partially suppressed the hTAC‐GFP overaccumulation phenotype in ptrn‐1 mutants. We conclude that the PTRN‐1 CH domain is required to stimulate CYK‐1 to facilitate actin dynamics during endocytic recycling.     

The dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during sporogenesis in Psilotum nudum L.

The actin cytoskeleton (microfilaments, MFs) accompanies the tubulin cytoskeleton (microtubules) during the meiotic division of the cell, but knowledge about the scope of their physiological competence and cooperation is insufficient. To cast more light on this issue, we analysed the F-actin distribution during the meiotic division of the Psilotum nudum sporocytes. Unfixed sporangia of P. nudum were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride, and we monitored the changes in the actin cytoskeleton and nuclear chromatin throughout sporogenesis. We observed that the actin cytoskeleton in meiotically dividing cells is not only part of the kariokinetic spindle and phragmoplast but it also forms a well-developed network in the cytoplasm present in all phases of meiosis. Moreover, in telophase I F-actin filaments formed short-lived phragmoplast, which was adjacent to the plasma membrane, exactly at the site of future cell wall formation. Additionally, the meiocytes were pre-treated with cytochalasin-B at a concentration that causes damage to the MFs. This facilitated observation of the effect of selective MFs damage on the course of meiosis and sporogenesis of P. nudum. Changes were observed that occurred in the cytochalasin-treated cells: the daughter nuclei were located abnormally close to each other, there was no formation of the equatorial plate of organelles and, consequently, meiosis did not occur normally. It seems possible that, if the actin cytoskeleton only is damaged, regular cytokinesis will not occur and, hence, no viable spores will be produced.     

The Role of Formin Tails in Actin Nucleation,Processive Elongation,and Filament Bundling

Formins are multidomain proteins that assemble actin in a wide variety of biological processes. They both nucleate and remain processively associated with growing filaments, in some cases accelerating filament growth. The well conserved formin homology 1 and 2 domains were originally thought to be solely responsible for these activities. Recently a role in nucleation was identified for the Diaphanous autoinhibitory domain (DAD), which is C-terminal to the formin homology 2 domain. The C-terminal tail of the Drosophila formin Cappuccino (Capu) is conserved among FMN formins but distinct from other formins. It does not have a DAD domain. Nevertheless, we find that Capu-tail plays a role in filament nucleation similar to that described for mDia1 and other formins. Building on this, replacement of Capu-tail with DADs from other formins tunes nucleation activity. Capu-tail has low-affinity interactions with both actin monomers and filaments. Removal of the tail reduces actin filament binding and bundling. Furthermore, when the tail is removed, we find that processivity is compromised. Despite decreased processivity, the elongation rate of filaments is unchanged. Again, replacement of Capu-tail with DADs from other formins tunes the processive association with the barbed end, indicating that this is a general role for formin tails. Our data show a role for the Capu-tail domain in assembling the actin cytoskeleton, largely mediated by electrostatic interactions. Because of its multifunctionality, the formin tail is a candidate for regulation by other proteins during cytoskeletal rearrangements.     

Analysis of formin functions during cytokinesis using specific inhibitor SMIFH2

The phragmoplast separates daughter cells during cytokinesis by constructing the cell plate, which depends on interaction between cytoskeleton and membrane compartments. Proteins responsible for these interactions remain unknown, but formins can link cytoskeleton with membranes and several members of formin protein family localize to the cell plate. Progress in functional characterization of formins in cytokinesis is hindered by functional redundancies within the large formin gene family. We addressed this limitation by employing Small Molecular Inhibitor of Formin Homology 2 (SMIFH2), a small-molecule inhibitor of formins. Treatment of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) tissue culture cells with SMIFH2 perturbed localization of actin at the cell plate; slowed down both microtubule polymerization and phragmoplast expansion; diminished association of dynamin-related proteins with the cell plate independently of actin and microtubules; and caused cell plate swelling. Another impact of SMIFH2 was shortening of the END BINDING1b (EB1b) and EB1c comets on the growing microtubule plus ends in N. tabacum tissue culture cells and Arabidopsis thaliana cotyledon epidermis cells. The shape of the EB1 comets in the SMIFH2-treated cells resembled that of the knockdown mutant of plant Xenopus Microtubule-Associated protein of 215 kDa (XMAP215) homolog MICROTUBULE ORGANIZATION 1/GEMINI 1 (MOR1/GEM1). This outcome suggests that formins promote elongation of tubulin flares on the growing plus ends. Formins AtFH1 (A. thaliana Formin Homology 1) and AtFH8 can also interact with EB1. Besides cytokinesis, formins function in the mitotic spindle assembly and metaphase to anaphase transition. Our data suggest that during cytokinesis formins function in: (1) promoting microtubule polymerization; (2) nucleating F-actin at the cell plate; (3) retaining dynamin-related proteins at the cell plate; and (4) remodeling of the cell plate membrane.

Formins regulate phragmoplast expansion, microtubule turnover rate, actin nucleation, and cell plate membrane remodeling during cytokinesis.     

Origins and evolution of the formin multigene family that is involved in the formation of actin filaments

In eukaryotes, the assembly and elongation of unbranched actin filaments is controlled by formins, which are long, multidomain proteins. These proteins are important for dynamic cellular processes such as determination of cell shape, cell division, and cellular interaction. Yet, no comprehensive study has been done about the origins and evolution of this gene family. We therefore performed extensive phylogenetic and motif analyses of the formin genes by examining 597 prokaryotic and 53 eukaryotic genomes. Additionally, we used three-dimensional protein structure data in an effort to uncover distantly related sequences. Our results suggest that the formin homology 2 (FH2) domain, which promotes the formation of actin filaments, is a eukaryotic innovation and apparently originated only once in eukaryotic evolution. Despite the high degree of FH2 domain sequence divergence, the FH2 domains of most eukaryotic formins are predicted to assume the same fold and thus have similar functions. The formin genes have experienced multiple taxon-specific duplications and followed the birth-and-death model of evolution. Additionally, the formin genes experienced taxon-specific genomic rearrangements that led to the acquisition of unrelated protein domains. The evolutionary diversification of formin genes apparently increased the number of formin's interacting molecules and consequently contributed to the development of a complex and precise actin assembly mechanism. The diversity of formin types is probably related to the range of actin-based cellular processes that different cells or organisms require. Our results indicate the importance of gene duplication and domain acquisition in the evolution of the eukaryotic cell and offer insights into how a complex system, such as the cytoskeleton, evolved.     

Yeast formin Bni1p has multiple localization regions that function in polarized growth and spindle orientation

Formins are conserved proteins that assemble unbranched actin filaments in a regulated, localized manner. Budding yeast's two formins, Bni1p and Bnr1p, assemble actin cables necessary for polarized cell growth and organelle segregation. Here we define four regions in Bni1p that contribute to its localization to the bud and at the bud neck. The first (residues 1-333) requires dimerization for its localization and encompasses the Rho-binding domain. The second (residues 334-821) covers the Diaphanous inhibitory-dimerization-coiled coil domains, and the third is the Spa2p-binding domain. The fourth region encompasses the formin homology 1-formin homology 2-COOH region of the protein. These four regions can each localize to the bud cortex and bud neck at the right stage of the cell cycle independent of both F-actin and endogenous Bni1p. The first three regions contribute cumulatively to the proper localization of Bni1p, as revealed by the effects of progressive loss of these regions on the actin cytoskeleton and fidelity of spindle orientation. The fourth region contributes to the localization of Bni1p in tiny budded cells. Expression of mislocalized Bni1p constructs has a dominant-negative effect on both growth and nuclear segregation due to mislocalized actin assembly. These results define an unexpected complexity in the mechanism of formin localization and function.     

Molecular characterization of Toxoplasma gondii formin 3, an actin nucleator dispensable for tachyzoite growth and motility

Toxoplasma gondii belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa, a group of obligate intracellular parasites that rely on gliding motility to enter host cells. Drugs interfering with the actin cytoskeleton block parasite motility, host cell invasion, and egress from infected cells. Myosin A, profilin, formin 1, formin 2, and actin-depolymerizing factor have all been implicated in parasite motility, yet little is known regarding the importance of actin polymerization and other myosins for the remaining steps of the parasite lytic cycle. Here we establish that T. gondii formin 3 (TgFRM3), a newly described formin homology 2 domain (FH2)-containing protein, binds to Toxoplasma actin and nucleates rabbit actin assembly in vitro. TgFRM3 expressed as a transgene exhibits a patchy localization at several distinct structures within the parasite. Disruption of the TgFRM3 gene by double homologous recombination in a ku80-ko strain reveals no vital function for tachyzoite propagation in vitro, which is consistent with its weak level of expression in this life stage. Conditional stabilization of truncated forms of TgFRM3 suggests that different regions of the molecule contribute to distinct localizations. Moreover, expression of TgFRM3 lacking the C-terminal domain severely affects parasite growth and replication. This work provides a first insight into how this specialized formin, restricted to the group of coccidia, completes its actin-nucleating activity.     

Interaction of formin FH2 with skeletal muscle actin. EPR and DSC studies

Formins are highly conserved proteins that are essential in the formation and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. The formin homology 2 (FH2) domain is responsible for actin binding and acts as an important nucleating factor in eukaryotic cells. In this work EPR and DSC were used to investigate the properties of the mDia1-FH2 formin fragment and its interaction with actin. MDia1-FH2 was labeled with a maleimide spin probe (MSL). EPR results suggested that the MSL was attached to a single SH group in the FH2. In DSC and temperature-dependent EPR experiments we observed that mDia1-FH2 has a flexible structure and observed a major temperature-induced conformational change at 41 °C. The results also confirmed the previous observation obtained by fluorescence methods that formin binding can destabilize the structure of actin filaments. In the EPR experiments the intermolecular connection between the monomers of formin dimers proved to be flexible. Considering the complex molecular mechanisms underlying the cellular roles of formins this internal flexibility of the dimers is probably important for manifestation of their biological functions.